Slashdot Mirror


iPhone 4 Reception Recall Ruckus Roundup

Readers today have been sending tons of stories about the iPhone 4, so here are a few of the highlights: Following the Consumers Reports announcement that the iPhone has antenna problems, Andy Patrizio asks if Apple can withstand the pressure to recall, while CNet estimates that a recall would cost them $1.5B. But that's just the latest on the iPhone 4 — the long running carrier exclusivity lawsuit rumors have been upgraded to Class Action status.

52 of 479 comments (clear)

  1. Stock price is falling too by SquarePixel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CNet estimates that a A recall would cost them $1.5B

    It's not only that cost. In 3 days Apple's stock has gone down a huge 5%, costing Apple and their shareholders millions of dollars and creating huge image problems.

    It also look like Apple's PR team completely messed up, from the "learn a new way to hold a phone" to removing of any critical comments from their support forums. Considering PR and marketing is one of Apple's strongest areas and which pushes everything they do forward, they did some incredibly stupid decisions.

    Now that they are basically ignoring the problem, any more time they take doing nothing will cost them even more.

    1. Re:Stock price is falling too by dintech · · Score: 5, Funny

      iPhone 4 Reception Recall Ruckus Roundup

      I'm more interested in why CmdrTaco sounds like the narrator from Wacky Races.

    2. Re:Stock price is falling too by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      "learn a new way to hold a phone" means don't hold the phone how we hold it in every commercial/ad for the iPhone 4, where they touch the bottom left. - Steve

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Stock price is falling too by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not only that cost. In 3 days Apple's stock has gone down a huge 5% ...

      We must have a different definition of huge when applying that adjective to percentages. Let's see it's 10:15 EST on Wednesday morning. Stock is currently at 252.11. Three stock market days ago would have been Friday morning at 10:15 EST and the price was 257.04. Okay so that comes out to be 4.93/257.04 = 1.9%. If you meant to say it's down a "huge five dollars" then maybe. Yes, they opened and plummeted down to $247 on Tuesday so if you compare that to their seven day high of $261 you get five percent. I don't think that's anything to be concerned over. A five percent fluctuation really isn't that big of a deal. If you look at Microsoft from Friday morning at 10 AM to now they've jumped five percent ... it's just the stock market game. I can find arbitrary percentage numbers bigger than this in many technology stocks all day long.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:Stock price is falling too by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does the share price going down cost Apple anything?

      Sure it costs the shareholders something, but why Apple itself?

      Are they borrowing so much money that a 5% drop in their share price has upped the interest rate they pay? Are they doing a share issue to generate cash?

      Wouldn't it reduce the cost of any stock/stock option components of remuneration packages, and hence save Apple money?

    5. Re:Stock price is falling too by Haffner · · Score: 4, Informative

      In 3 days Apple's stock has gone down a huge 5%

      Citation needed. Average price end of last week: 257. Average price today/yesterday: 251. 5% of 250 = 12.5. The local max (Thursday, 262) and the local min (Tuesday, 247) come out to 6%. And the max to the min means nothing, especially when they are as brief as they have been with AAPL.

      Not to say Apple's stock has not dropped, but it has not gone down a huge 5%. Source: google.com/finance

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    6. Re:Stock price is falling too by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Previously I made this remark on the subject:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1716900&cid=32881054

      It would seem my guesses, assumptions and observations are bearing out. Apple has extended itself too far beyond its fan base and has gone into the jungle of varied user types with varied expectations, varied tolerances, varied temperments and varied mentalities.

      Apple once worked within its cult. Growing outside of that is proving difficult. Trying to push that cult into the hearts and minds of new users is also proving difficult.

    7. Re:Stock price is falling too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steve Jobs' Neck: I know there are lot of complaints about the iPhone, but my head doesn't seem to get them.
      Tech Support: You're holding it wrong.
      Steve Jobs' Neck: What?
      Tech Support: You need to take it out of the sand.

  2. One Point Five Billion Dollars by DWMorse · · Score: 4, Informative

    How you like them Apples?

    I already returned my iPhone 4, barely got it out of the box before return shipping. Droid X looks like it'll be replacing my half-functional iPhone 3G tomorrow.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
  3. Recall? No way! by vvaduva · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jobs is too arrogant to allow a recall...they'll find a way to blame customers for this eventually, or weasel out of doing a full recall.

    1. Re:Recall? No way! by butterflysrage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By the time they class action is done, all the customer is likely to see will be a $50 credit on their next iPhone.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    2. Re:Recall? No way! by east+coast · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking more along the lines of a free iPhone app.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Recall? No way! by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Funny

      An iPhone app depicting the correct way to hold the iPhone, followed by another class action lawsuit started by people who couldn't download the "You're Doing It Wrong!" app because, well, they were doing it wrong.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  4. Signals by Wowsers · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what we're saying is that the new iPhone is getting a bad reception??? :)

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  5. Who cares? by w00tsauce · · Score: 4, Informative

    With all the Apple publicity they probably made an extra $1.5 billion. It's not like the iphone is gods gift, anyone ever been to europe/asia? They had phones like this five years ago.

    1. Re:Who cares? by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, there's nothing new for Asia.

      Oh, wait. Whoops!
      And that was for the previous version of the iPhone.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Who cares? by progr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I live in Europe and 5 years ago I didn't see a phone nearly comparable to an iPhone 4.

  6. Stock is not a big problem. by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they dont release a patch, their stock will be useful only as wallpaper by the weekend.

    Except, that is what many savvy investors are counting on, because the fall in their stock price is really a reaction of fear.

    Savvy investors never trade on emotion, and they bank on the emotion of others by reading the emotions that drive the market. This still works because the majority of those who trade stocks are still very emotional.

    Apple basically shot themselves in the foot, and their wounds are bound to heal. That is far better than if someone else (like MS) shot them and they got hurt, as that would be a sign of vulnurability to competition.

    1. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by nicke999 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "the majority of those who trade stocks are still very emotional"

      Not true. The major owners in Apple, as any major company on the stock market, are mutual funds and institutional holders with 72% of the stocks. Maybe the majority of the small time investors are emotional, I don't know, but that is a completely different thing since they can only affect the stock price so much.

      --
      Thanks for browsing at -1
      Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
    2. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given that stock pricing has a lot to do with how many buy/sell orders get placed and not quite as much with how many shares get bought/sold, churn in that little 28% can have a huge effect on price considering they are probably 99% of the shareholders by headcount.

    3. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's been in the forecast for a long time. C64Love is not the right person to answer economics questions... some googling should help you.

      The gist of it is that the US enjoys a very stable dollar because it is the world's reserve currency, and because oil is purchased in dollars globally. The speculation has been that the USD would be dropped as a reserve currency because it is no longer as stable as some of the alternative currencies (in particular, the EUR). C64Love is a little behind the current thought among most economists, however -- as we've seen this year, the Euro is not a valid alternative to the USD as a reserve currency -- the problems with the economies of Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Greece mean that the EUR has a lot of question marks.

      Since China's currency is still pegged to a basket of currencies (though less so than it was), their currency is not a valid reserve either -- no one knows if China would one day decide to screw everyone over by revaluing the currency.

      In short, the USD is a lot less stable, especially forecasting 10-20 years from now, as it has been in the past. Fortunately for Americans, there are no currencies out there that look better.

      Interestingly, currency issues have been mentioned as a big reason why the US went into Iraq in the early 90s... Iraq was beating some drums about selling oil in Euros. That would have been *disastrous* for the US economy...

      But I'm assuming you're aware of most of this, and just questioning C64's claim since he talks out of his ass...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Currency issues aren't why the US invaded Iraq. Nor was it for oil, though that helped to motivate people for the invasion. The real reason is the most banal imaginable and it is the reason that most wars are started: they thought it would be easy. This is why they didn't think or plan the invasion. They knew Iraq had no friends, and they thought they could easily place a major American presence in the area that would stabilize the Middle East. And they thought that Iraq and al Qaeda were linked (yes, I know it is stupid, but they couldn't grasp the concept that al Qaeda has more in common with the Mob than a country). That's it. There were no master plans. There were just yes-men, knee-jerk reactions, and an unwillingness to question bad decisions (or even acknowledge them).

      Think of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc., as a corporate board and it will be easier to grasp.

    5. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps not ("I'm a doctor damnit, not a number cruncher!"), but I still am better informed than you are.

      No, you're not better informed. The SDR, even if the UN starts using it, will be phased in over a long period to maintain stability. In addition, it WOULD include a USD component, just as it does now (currently, the SDR uses USD, EUR, GBP, and CNY -- 44%, 34%, 11%, 11% respectively).

      The question is how the basket for the SDR will be changed to include more less developed nations.

      At any rate, the USD will continue to be a major component of the world's reserve currency (which, even in the worst-case scenario for Americans, would still have the USD as the largest component, since it will be based on GDP [specifically, adjustments to the value based on inflation vs. change in GDP]. So the only thing that would collapse the value of the dollar is a collapse of the US economy... which, in your logic, is predicated on a collapse of the currency. That's circular logic.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Stock is not a big problem. by bsane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well technically the _invasion_ was easy... its the follow up that turned out to be really hard ;-)

  7. ZOMG a "huge" -5%?! by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That puts the share price at a mere 177% of its value 1 year ago. Their investors must be pissed!

    1. Re:ZOMG a "huge" -5%?! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You realize that's 5% JUST from the buzz around Apple, and doesn't even include the cost and repercussions after they preform a recall?

      Yes, their stock price is still healthy.

      Yes, after it's all said and done, they'll probably still be above what they were a year ago.

      But these sort of things have far reaching consequences. Do you realize how many people buy Apple products because they "simply work"? This one unreliable product has planted the seed of doubt.

    2. Re:ZOMG a "huge" -5%?! by masmullin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't true. Many of us are Unix users (fans?) waiting for a nicely polished Linux/BSD. OSX is polished.

    3. Re:ZOMG a "huge" -5%?! by CompMD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They haven't had *one* unreliable product, Apple has had plenty. Look at the last decade of laptops they've made, they have been plagued with problems. The most notable is the dual USB iBook video chip flaw. This was a design and engineering flaw that Apple at least dealt with (by extending warranties and replacing logic boards) but they NEVER did ANYTHING to actually FIX the problem. There was no recall. They replaced defective boards with new defective boards that had yet to demonstrate the defect, fully knowing that it was only a matter of time before that board also failed, conveniently after the extended warranty period ended. How they got away with a stunt like that is beyond comprehension.

      On the record, I own one of the afflicted laptops, and fixing the problem correctly is a non trivial task, since not many people have access to or knowledge of how to use SMT rework equipment.

  8. $1.5B is a BOGUS number... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem is the antennas being shorted by a slightly conductive (sweaty) finger bridging one or more of the three breaks.

    Apple doesn't need a recall to fix the problem: future phones can have a coating, and a free bumper ($10 cost to Apple) to existing customers solves all the problems.

    At 2M iPhones, the "recall fix" would be a whopping $20M.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:$1.5B is a BOGUS number... by ftobin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a bumper would be a wart. Apple clearly has style in the forefront of their minds when they design a mobile device; it is part of their brand image. Anything interrupting the sleekness of the product would tarnish perception of the company. It would be a constant physical reminder of a flaw.

      I think it is most likely in Apple's best interest to get new phones out to people with a redesigned antenna solution.

  9. Apple: Send a free case, it will cost you less by StuartHankins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, I love Apple products. I own / have owned a MacBook Pro, 2 iMacs, an iPod 2G, an iPhone 3GS, an iPad, an Airport Express, and an iPod shuffle. I get it.

    But, seriously Apple, you did a recall with the MacBook battery issue. You replaced batteries and even though it cost you some money your karma was helped by it. Do the same with the iPhone 4... offer owners a case which you test to make sure fixes the problem. It will probably cost you $20 per for these including shipping and processing assuming you can get the cases for $4 or so. But you will instantly shut up the majority of people who are complaining VERY loudly about the problem AND you will have "done the right thing".

    NO company is capable of 100% preventing mistakes, but it's how you act as a company that determines how you're perceived. You can be cool and hip all you want but if customers are afraid to purchase your products because you've stuck to your guns and forced lawsuits to happen you lose in the long run.

    1. Re:Apple: Send a free case, it will cost you less by pauljlucas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But, seriously Apple, you did a recall with the MacBook battery issue. You replaced batteries and even though it cost you some money your karma was helped by it.

      Bad batteries are completely different from bad cellphone reception. The former can cause a fire, damage to the laptop, damage to the home if the fire spreads, and possibly death. Not doing a recall on batteries would probably land them in serious trouble with the government, especially if there were fatalities. The same can't be said for mere bad cellphone reception.

      Additionally, at the time the MacBook batteries were recalled, there were plenty of other batteries from other vendors having problems, hence Apple didn't stand out. In contrast, the iPhone 4 problems are obviously Apple's alone.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:Apple: Send a free case, it will cost you less by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Bad batteries are completely different from bad cellphone reception. The former can cause a fire, damage to the laptop, damage to the home if the fire spreads, and possibly death.

      I'd say the bigger difference is that the battery vendor paid for most of the recall. I'm sure that's in the contract. This design issue with the antenna is all Apple's fault and would involve admitting a mistake on their part, not an outside vendor, and they would have to absorb 100% of the cost.

  10. They've really shot themselves in the foot by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm very disappointed in the way they've handled this. The least they could do is issue certificates for free bumpers IMMEDIATELY for any iPhone 4 owners who want one, in addition to waiving the restocking fee (which they already did). That would have done a lot to shore up customer loyalty and keep their image good.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  11. smart move by p51d007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reason I have passed on ALL of the iPhones so far is I don't buy into the hype, not to mention a LOCKED OS. Hey, if you just pick up a phone to use it, then perhaps the iPhone is for you, but, if you are a "tinker" type, I don't see how the iPhone would be good. Even given all of the faults with WinMobile, at least you can hack it til the cows come home. The way I look at it is it is MY phone, and I'll screw around with it how I want to. I don't like "locked" phones. My current phone, HTC Rhodium (Tilt2) never even had the stock OS fired up. I told the guy at the at&t store that I would set it up later (since I already had a Touch Pro). Took it home, unlocked it, wiped out the stock OS and put one from XDA-Developers on it and tweaked it exactly how I wanted. Job's & Company have a MAJOR public relations nightmare on their hands, and a golden opportunity for some of their competitors to run ads that exploit this problem.

  12. The thing is... by sjonke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... that my iPhone 4 is outperforming my 3GS, in terms of 3G connection quality and reliability, sometimes to pretty miraculous degree, such as at the train station I wait at every work day, where my 3GS's signal would jump up and down and go away and come back and even when it was showing 5 bars the performance was horrendous. With the iPhone 4 I can in fact reproduce the signal drop when held in my left hand, going pretty dramatically from 4 bars to only 1, but even at 1 bar the performance is outstanding and for the first time ever I've got a 100% reliable and fast connection here. I can stream audio and browse the web and it's fast, even at 1 bar. At 4 bars if not left handed.

    So I'm not downplaying the drop in signal strength issue, as that is there when you hold it left handed (and I do usually), but that in practice it performs better, even a lot better, then my iPhone 3GS. So is the antenna flawed or not? I would say that it is flawed, but only from a PR standpoint. It's a public relations disaster, brought only by people who don't have an iPhone 4 and who seem to have a vendetta against Apple for not making a phone that they want, and due to magazines like Consumers Reports, who aren't seeing the forest for the trees. They are focusing solely on that there is a drop, and ignoring how it performs in practice. You need to just use the phone and see how it works for you, and most, I suspect, once they stop staring at the signal strength gauge, are going to find that it does better then their previous phone, even by a wide margin. The iPhone 4 is a great phone. Yes, you should put a case on it, as that will reduce the signal drop issue, but that issue is not nearly as big of an issue as it is being made out to be. It's not a non-issue, it just not the main thing you should be concerned about. You should be concerned about how it performs in practice, and the iPhone 4 excels there.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:The thing is... by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anandtech's review (which I believe is far more in-depth than the CR?) claims that the iPhone4 holds onto a call at -113dbm. There is no doubt there is a antenna gap bridging problem and that this DOES cause the signal to drop, but at the same time the overall antenna performance seems better versus ie the 3gs. Weird.

      From my day of testing, I've determined that the iPhone 4 performs much better than the 3GS in situations where signal is very low, at -113 dBm (1 bar). Previously, dropping this low all but guaranteed that calls would drop, fail to be placed, and data would no longer be transacted at all. I can honestly say that I've never held onto so many calls and data simultaneously on 1 bar at -113 dBm as I have with the iPhone 4, so it's readily apparent that the new baseband hardware is much more sensitive compared to what was in the 3GS. The difference is that reception is massively better on the iPhone 4 in actual use.

    2. Re:The thing is... by nwoolls · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is what almost every in-depth article on the situation is finding. Yes there is a "design flaw", but given the overall improvements in the iPhone 4, it is still performing (for most people) better than the 3G or 3GS. Think of it as two steps forward and one step back. To people upgrading from the 3G and 3GS, they still get a great phone with improvements across the board. This only really matters to those who want to demonstrate an issue.

      Basically, haters gotta be hatin.

  13. Three reasons why they have kept silent by BodeNGE · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Design: Only an ignorant fool would put an external, metal antenna on a phone. Not only does nobody do this, nobody has ever done this in the history of mobile phones. Even the whip antennas of the 80's were coated in plastic for the very reason that a direct connection changes the electrical length of the antenna (and hence the frequencies that it can transmit and receive. When you are part of the antenna you radiate too.
    Cannot admit: iPhone4 irradiates you when you hold it wrong. It may appear that the iPhone4 gives you cancer.

    Manufacturing: There may be a manufacturing component to it as well. We know they were rushed out the door without even time for the touchscreen bonding glue to dry. Clearly the Foxconn QA was not followed. If an engineer leaves a thumbprint on an internal antenna it detunes it. Imagine what a rushed assembly with leaky glue would do to the tuning characteristics.
    Cannot admit: Apply don't pay their manufacturers enough and circumvent their own QA guidelines to rush product to market. They may appear like greedy bastards.

    AT&T: The drop problem is also in a small, small part down to AT&T's 3G network topology. Nowhere near as bad as the old iPhone problem of congesting the signalling channels, this is simply due to the fact that 3G signals are way more sensitive to received signal strength. When you hold it the wrong way not only does the handset not heat the base station well (showing fewer bars on the phone) but it is the network that cannot hear the iPhone that causes the call drops as your entire hand and arm are radiating instead of the antenna. When you broadly detune the antenna with your hand the lower powered 3G signal is simply too feint and distorted to be heard by the base station. It does explain why the locations where the issues appear are random and seemingly not related in all cases to the downlink signal strength shown on the handset. RF signals are like that.
    Cannot admit: The issue clearly isn't all to do with AT&T and they blamed them the last time with the 3GS.

  14. CNet estimates that a A recall would cost them by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    CNet estimates that a A recall would cost them $1.5B

    It would cost them a LOT more than that. If the letter A were recalled, they'd be Pple Corportion.

    And they'd sell iPds instead of iPads. Their stock symbol would have to change from AAPL to PL - but that's taken, and so is PPL. PPLE is available, but pple.com is owned by a squatter.

    And it's not just Apple. If the letter A were recalled:

    1. Canada becomes Cnd.
    2. The planet Mrs? I though women were from Venus!
    3. Caucasian sounds kind of dirty when you're a kid - but nowhere near as bad as Cucsin.
    4. Barack Obama becoms Brck Obm
    5. Barbara becomes Brbr (sounds more like an abbreviation for bathroom break).
    6. The United States of America becomes United Sttes of Meric.
    7. email becoms emil - sounds french
    8. spam is no longer spam
    9. who wants to ride in an uto, a trin, or a plne - but a bot sounds fun
    10. when you die, you're ded, and they hold a wke to celebrte.
    11. neither utumn nor fll sound like a season
    12. Does Pril sound like a month? How about My? Ugust sounds windy instead of hot.

    About the only good thing about recalling the letter a is that vaginas stay vgins - no matter how many times they're poked! Hmmm, on second thought, maybe it's worth 1.5 billion.

  15. Technical details from AnandTech by InvisiBill · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2

    Anand found that gripping the iPhone 4 a certain way could indeed cause up to 24dB of signal drop. This was worst-case, with a sweaty deathgrip. Touching more lightly or with less moisture had less of an effect. Gripping other smartphones near their antennas also caused a drop in signal.

    The non-linear signal representation of the "bars" can also lead to some confusion related to this. The valid range is between -113dB (no signal) and -51dB (full signal). However, 5 bars represents the range of -51 to -91. 4 bars is -91 to -101. 3 bars is -101 to -103. 2 bars is -103 to -107. 1 bar is -107 to -113. If you have a full strength 5 bar connection, that 24dB drop won't even move you out of the 5th bar. If you've just barely got 5 bars, the same 24dB drop can put you down to 1 or 0 bars.

    Anand's testing also confirmed what sjonke said in the comment above. Even when it was showing the same signal strength, the iPhone 4 was better at not dropping calls compared to the 3GS. The page shows a screenshot of a 625/31 run on Speedtest.net during a call with only -113dB.

  16. Re:Two words for you... by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom isn't free, and by buying and jailbreaking an iPhone you financially support Apple's douchebaggery and encourage the development of more crippled, locked down systems, perhaps with more effective jails.

    Why do that when you can have an Android phone which you're encouraged to hack on, with real multi-tasking and an open source OS?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  17. That would be an interesting argument in court. by fredmosby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Defense Lawyer: "Can it be used to make phone calls?"
    Expert Witness: "Well...yeah, but it's reception isn't as good as it could be."
    Defense Lawyer: "Is the reception worse than most other phones on the market?"
    Expert Witness: "Well no, but..."
    Judge: "Next case please."

    I'm not surprised that that the iPhone 4 isn't absolutely perfect in every way. No product is. This is a pretty minor issue that has been blown out of proportion. If I were in charge of Apple I would just give out those 'bumpers' for free and hope this all blows over.

  18. Apple joins Sony in the do-not-buy list by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have to support hundreds of iMacs and MacBooks at work, and I've had to call in tons of warranty repairs the last couple years (easily 10x than from our pool of HP and Dell machines). I thought maybe apple was ditching quality on the macs in favor of the iPhone, iPod, because of iTunes $$$, but it seems they're just neglecting quality across the board. It doesn't "just work" anymore; it just looks pretty (until the style looks outdated).

  19. Re:Two words for you... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jail. Break. The iPhone is just as hackable as other systems out there.

    That's like telling people to adopt Christianity, because it doesn't actually stop you from committing the sins you like.

  20. Wifes not getting one cause of this by splatter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a 3gs from beginning of this year so I'm not eligible, but my wife is and has been waiting for a few months for the 4g to come out.

    It now looks like she is going to either wait for apple to issue a fix or go with an android phone. If anything I know she is not alone and I'd guess she probably represents 2 or 3% of potential customers that are now not going to buy this device.

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  21. Re:It does "simply work" by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seconded. I've yet to get an iPhone, but I've got a friend who picked up a couple 4s right when they came out. He couldn't be happier. Even though they do lose some signal with the right grip, in daily use they drop fewer calls and have better sound quality than Blackberries/Palms/other phones he's used. So it's hard for him to get too worked up about this issue.

    And American phone subsidies notwithstanding, it's a $600 device. If you care about your phone, buy a freaking case or bumper already! And/or a bluetooth headset. You don't have to be that kid sitting in Starbucks showing off just how spendy a phone your parents bought you.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  22. Proof for you by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Link or lies! A 4bar drop to 0 has never happened to any of my phones no matter how I hold them.

    Let me google that for you (Nexus One)

    There were videos around for other phone if you simply do a search.

    If you can't replicate the problem, then you are simply in the same boat as iPhone 4 owners who can't replicate the problem it's supposed to have either (I know a few iPhone 4 users that cannot get the signal to drop, and athough I've been able to reproduce it I can't get it to happen all the time).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. What nobody seems to understand by roachdabug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an engineering background and while I have by no means conducted a scientific study, I can tell you with utmost certainty that the iPhone4 does hardly has a signal reception problem.

    It has a signal TRANSMISSION problem.

    I've done quite a lot of mucking around with speed test apps on the device and I have observed that while touching the left gap between antennas does cause a marginal decrease in download speed, the signal is by no means blocked. To me, it appears the device can still hear the signal from the tower pretty well even with a human hand to detune the antenna.

    Upload speeds, on the other hand, are severely crippled or blocked altogether. It appears that touching the gap has an extremely negative impact on the device's ability to emit a signal strong enough for the tower to hear. This theory is supported by call tests I conducted in which the other party was unable to hear me whenever the gap was touched, even though I could hear their voice just fine.

    Quite by accident, I also happened to set my phone down next to a set of computer speakers which were very sensitive to cell phone radio interference, resulting in the typical "GSM Buzz" which most of you of you have surely experienced. What I discovered was that a single fingertip over the gap would almost completely eliminate the speaker buzz due to the interference. Touching anywhere else on the device had no discernible effect. Once again, it would appear that touching the gap severely hinders outgoing transmissions from the device, even over extremely short distances.

    As I said, these observations are about as un-scientific as it gets, so feel free to draw your own conclusions. But as far as I can tell, touching the gap is enough to stop your phone's outgoing signal from ever reaching the tower, and a tower which thinks your phone is no longer there isn't going to maintain your call for very long.

  24. Re:Wrong by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen videos from Wired and Engadget of picking up the phone and letting it rest comfortable in your hand where the signal goes from 4 bars to No Signal.

    Even the most ardent Pro-Apple sites have confirmed in their testing that this is a serious problem.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  25. Re:It does "simply work" by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was about to wonder about your problems till I saw that last part...you're running iTunes on Windows?

    I've run all of this on a mac (older one granted, a G5 Tower I got cheap)...and no problems at all. I'd dare say if you run Apple stuff on Apple products...9 times out of 10, it does just work. Mixing MS windows in the equation is likely asking for trouble.

    Oh, so it only crashes, erases songs, etc for 90% of their customers. THAT'S PRETTY GOOD!!! [/sarcasm, if you couldn't tell]

    The shitty quality of iTunes and Quicktime on Windows is simply inexcusable. *Especially* since they have other applications, like Safari, that run quite well on Windows. Hell, even is Windows was the one with the 5% marketshare, it would *still* be inexcusable.

    iTunes, by virtue of its scummy buggy-ass drivers and services, is the *only* application I've seen on Windows 7 that can still lock-up completely unrelated applications. (In my case, World of Warcraft locked-up for a solid 4 minutes while iTunes was updating my phone's firmware. Figure THAT one out!)

  26. Not as bad as it sounds, not as good as it looks.. by Panaflex · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had an iPhone 4 for a few weeks now, and largely it works 99% as promised. IMHO there are bigger bugs than the "don't touch here" antenna problem!

    1. Overheating shutdown... (I think). If the phone is in my pocket, sometimes I take it out and it's off... I'm guessing it is overheating (hot down here in Texas...)
    2. GSM unit crashes... I sometimes venture out into the boonies and sometimes the gsm system just stops working with spotty coverage in hilly areas. When I return to a city with a strong signal, the unit never comes back up and signal strength stays at 0-1 bars.
    3. Occasional app crashes... sometimes an app just crashes, usually one of the older apps like facebook, rope n'fly and a couple of other games. It's actually really rare, and I don't seem to loose anything, so it's minor at this point. These apps were rock solid on my 3gs phone, so that's why I mention it.

    Overall I'm pretty happy the experience though... it's a lot faster. The voice quality is much better. The screen is fantastic. If #1 and #2 can be fixed then it would be fantastic, otherwise I'll return it and wait for iPhone 4.1...

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.