Slashdot Mirror


Deported Russian (Spy?) Worked At Microsoft

subtropolis writes "KOMO News in Seattle is reporting that a recently-deported 23-yr-old Russian man 'appears to have ties to the recently-exposed Russian counterintelligence' (according to unnamed Feds). The article states that he admitted to unspecified immigration violations and was promptly shown the door on Tuesday. It also says that 'Microsoft confirms Karetnikov worked as an entry-level software tester for less than a year.' So, I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good at their logs for that time. He may have got in at 'entry-level' but his abilities may have been a fair bit beyond that. ... Interestingly, his admission to mere 'violations' and swift departure would be right in line with how this swap has gone down. The four Russians who were flown to Britain and the US had to first sign a confession before President Medvedev granted them pardons." The same news is at CBS News, too.

162 comments

  1. Oblig Yakov Smirnoff by PlasmaEye · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Microsoft spies on you!

    1. Re:Oblig Yakov Smirnoff by somaTh · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no, no. In Soviet Russia, you enforce DRM on Microsoft.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    2. Re:Oblig Yakov Smirnoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a first post get modded redundant??? Weird and me with no mod points today...

  2. The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    appears to have ties to the recently-exposed Russian counterintelligence

    ...And Iraq appeared to have WMDS...

    1. Re:The same government that... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      At one point in time, Iraq DID have WMDs. We know this for a fact, because they were bought from the US. They were used against Iran, and this is well documented. Saddam also had a vested interest in projecting the illusion he had WMDs currently, to ensure his status as a regional player. Iran may very well have decided to seek some revenge, if they knew Iraq was basically defenseless. That explains his brazen attitude and actions leading up to the invasion (Saddam's, not Bush's... I'm still trying to figure that one out). It's really not quite as clear-cut as either side of the domestic political debate would like us to believe.

    2. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      post anon as I moderated. Iraq used chemical weapons while US was looking for nuclear weapons. So your argument, is misleading and annoying for those seeking intelligent discussion. The rest of them are not much better either.

    3. Re:The same government that... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      It's really not quite as clear-cut as either side of the domestic political debate would like us to believe.

      When two separate UN WMD teams went in and found nothing, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When we gave these UN teams specific locations to search, because we "knew" Saddam had those weapons, and found nothing, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When the documents from Niger were shown to be an out-and-out fabrication which came from a known purveyor of such documents, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When a CIA NOC agent was outed because her husband happened to be the one who discovered the Niger documents were forgeries, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When the aluminum tubes, which were supposedly for uranium processing, were found to be for the creation of short range rockets, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When those mobile weapons labs were identified by British sources as being used to create hydrogen for mobile weather stations, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When the only evidence we had for Saddam possibly having the ability to make weapons came from a known drunk and liar, who we were never allowed to interview but had to have his confession transcribed, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:The same government that... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Nuclear weapons "evidence" was clearly B.S., however he is known to have chemical and biological weapons. He stated not to have nuclear weapons, but beat around the bush on the chem and bio weapons, and played a pseudo-shell game with inspectors, largely to keep up appearances with his neighbors. I am by no means a supporter of the Iraq war. I've lost enough friends to it not to have any romantic notions that we went in for the "right reasons" when the war was sold to us. However, it's not as if Saddam was a nice guy who was open about his intentions and gave full, un-fettered access to inspectors and/or journalists to prove he didn't have any weapons or weapons programs.

    5. Re:The same government that... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      post anon as I moderated

      Not anymore you didn't, unless you moved to a new IP.

      Slashdot just doesn't tell you that you're undoing your mods when you check the anonymous coward box.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    6. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Slashdot just uses a cookie for moderation, and only does cookie+IP for multi-posting. If you use Chrome, moving to Incognito mode should effectively work around it.

    7. Re:The same government that... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Nobody is arguing that Saddam was a decent guy, just that going in was a really bad mistake.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:The same government that... by vt0asta · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, it was quite obvious.

      When Saddam decided he was going to publicly sympathize with the Taliban post-9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Saddam decided to up the payout to suicide bomber's families that attacked Israel post 9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Saddam decided to play shell games with the UNSC resolutions, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When European and Russian contractors were found selling dual use and prohibited items, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Europe decided to the throw a colossal hissy fit over the end of food for oil, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Europe was no longer calling for action of the humanitarian crisis being caused by food for oil, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Europe then wanted to claim that the dual use items were broken, defective, etc., that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When American liberals seized on the opportunity to finally be mad at Bush again for losing what they felt was a stolen election, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When everyone in the world and especially at the UN who previously didn't trust Saddam, started to say he's not so bad, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When Osama Bin Laden was ranting a raving about American air bases in holy land (Saudi Arabia), the same bases being used to police no fly zones in Iraq, and people were trying to downplay the Ba'athist's intelligence agency's comfort with consorting with the pre-cursor to Al Qaeda - Egyptian Islamic Jihad, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      When a post-war inspection team took 18 months to scour a defeated Iraq, which I like to call "Iraq and Saddam at their most cooperative", only then were they able to confirm that their were no weapons and that Saddam only had breakout capacity for bio/chemical weapons, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      ---

      Seriously. Responsible adults had to take the information they had at the time, and make a decision. I continue to agree that keeping the Ba'athist around, trusting bitter partisan enemies of the US administration, trusting UNSC nations that were financially hurt by the end of the food for oil program, and keeping a tentative situation of sanctions and containment, we're exactly top priority.

      It may be true that the second war fomented terrorism. However, it is absolutely true that the Ba'athist containment/sanction process as agreed upon by the UN fomented terrorism at the expense of US security.

      --
      No.
    9. Re:The same government that... by ooshna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nuclear weapons "evidence" was clearly B.S., however he is known to have chemical and biological weapons. He stated not to have nuclear weapons, but beat around the bush on the chem and bio weapons, and played a pseudo-shell game with inspectors, largely to keep up appearances with his neighbors. I am by no means a supporter of the Iraq war. I've lost enough friends to it not to have any romantic notions that we went in for the "right reasons" when the war was sold to us. However, it's not as if Saddam was a nice guy who was open about his intentions and gave full, un-fettered access to inspectors and/or journalists to prove he didn't have any weapons or weapons programs.

      Yep and you'd give some crazy redneck that lives in another state the permission to search your house and land for illegal automatic weapons if he accused you of having them wouldn't you

    10. Re:The same government that... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      However, it is absolutely true that the Ba'athist containment/sanction process as agreed upon by the UN fomented terrorism at the expense of US security.

      Nobody's arguing that. We are, however arguing that a) that didn't amount to a hill of beans, and b) boy, was that ever the mother of overreactions.

      There's also the corollary argument that if the US (and other western countries) weren't so enamored with fucking around with these dipshit little countries in the first place, many of these problems simply wouldn't exist in the first place.

      Congrats on being technically correct and absolutely useless.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    11. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Saddam decided he was going to publicly sympathize with the Taliban post-9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right. When Saddam decided to up the payout to suicide bomber's families that attacked Israel post 9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      These two points are inconclusive. You are a dictator who lost a war to a foreign country. That same country is actively pursuing its interests in your area. People from your area attack that country. You do not sympathize with them? You HAVE TO, in front of the domestic audience, while being careful not to appear officially responsible in front of the rest of the world.

    12. Re:The same government that... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Only it turned out that Saddam, against all expectations, actually did fear repercussions and had all his WMD destroyed. Who'd have thought it! Certain no-one who wanted to trouble themselves with proof, when they *knew* the answer they wanted already.

    13. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time I have mod points, I'll blow one to check, but I'm fairly certain I've tried switching browsers.

    14. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you mean that UNSCOM really didn't destroy Iraq's calutrons. The question was how much was hidden? Looks like Sadam was stupid enough to not let the UNSCOM inspectors see that he complied, and was evasive enough that he ended up getting hung. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/unscom/photos/9.html

    15. Re:The same government that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would go to the root. Giving him those WMD in the first place was criminal. Whoever gave him WMD are accomplices, why were these criminals "let go"? Because it was us.

    16. Re:The same government that... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Of course it's fucking clear-cut. The US *lied* about the WMDs they claimed Saddam had. They straight-up lied. They knew the chemical weapons the US had sold Saddam were well past their shelf-life, and were useless. They then made up all that "they can attack us in 45-minutes" bullshit in order to go in. Saddam's "brazen" attitude? Care to tell us what that was? He was no different to many leaders around the world, and yet got singled out. And lo-and-behold, no WMDs. None. Just lots of intelligence that the WMD program ceased after the US withdrew its support (something that wasn't exactly a secret). The US made Saddam, then proceeded to make him what he was, then ultimately had him killed. Lovely.

    17. Re:The same government that... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Don't bother bringing logic to a stupidity fight. People who still think Saddam had it coming are assholes. Nothing he did couldn't have been worked out diplomatically. Nothing. But then where's the sport in that, when it's much easier to press a button and unleash hell upon a former ally.

    18. Re:The same government that... by vt0asta · · Score: 1

      Nobody's arguing that. We are, however arguing that a) that didn't amount to a hill of beans, and b) boy, was that ever the mother of overreactions.

      So you are arguing it...

      a) Embassies, WTC, Cole, WTC again, Pentagon b) I guess relying on smart weapons was the proper continued reaction in your mind. You're of course welcome to your opinion...however, conversely, I wouldn't trust you to walk my dog down the street.

      There's also the corollary argument that if the US (and other western countries) weren't so enamored with fucking around with these dipshit little countries in the first place, many of these problems simply wouldn't exist in the first place.

      Perhaps.

      Congrats on being technically correct and absolutely useless.

      If I knew what this meant, I would respond.

      --
      No.
    19. Re:The same government that... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      a) Embassies, WTC, Cole, WTC again, Pentagon

      Silly me, I thought we were talking about Iraq!

      I know, I know, don't feed the trolls...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    20. Re:The same government that... by vt0asta · · Score: 1

      When Saddam decided he was going to publicly sympathize with the Taliban post-9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right. When Saddam decided to up the payout to suicide bomber's families that attacked Israel post 9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.

      These two points are inconclusive. You are a dictator who lost a war to a foreign country. That same country is actively pursuing its interests in your area. People from your area attack that country. You do not sympathize with them? You HAVE TO, in front of the domestic audience, while being careful not to appear officially responsible in front of the rest of the world.

      Well, I guess by that logic, if you are in the business of sending messages to a domestic audience YOU HAVE to do what YOU HAVE to do.

      I'll await your implication that we should be smarter than that...

      --
      No.
  3. Not much there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article does not directly say that this guy was involved in the recent spy trade. This article goes into a little more depth on that particular aspect of the fun and games. Now, can we have more pictured of the red-head? That seems to be the part that the press cares most about.

  4. I'd worry a lot more about employees in China by winkydink · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Aurora, anyone?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:I'd worry a lot more about employees in China by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How does a 1-word post get modded "insightful?" I guess someone thinks that's a good replacement for, "contentless?"

    2. Re:I'd worry a lot more about employees in China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Your post, too many words. (Mine too.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:I'd worry a lot more about employees in China by unitron · · Score: 1

      How does a 1-word post get modded "insightful?" I guess someone thinks that's a good replacement for, "contentless?"

      Most of the content was in the title. The title is part of the post, and can legitimately be considered when moderating.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  5. why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    microsoft has freely given its source code to the kgb (rolls eyes):

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah... now here's someone who has been paying attention

      Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. Microsoft does a lot more than Windows; maybe this had to do with Office, Microsoft's online service offerings, Exchange Server, SQL Server etc. You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code (bear in mind that Windows 7 is a client OS)

    2. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be a nice way to make sure that the source given to them by MS is consistent with what MS actually ships. I would imagine that the Russian intelligence folks are not in the habit of trusting others.

    3. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's pretty easy to look at the public details of these ops from today's vantage point and go "that's stupid," but remember when these ops were first started the world was different. Dramatically different in the case of the spies which had been here 10 or 20 years, although not so much in this case. It's only been a year. But a year ago, the FSB didn't have a contract with Microsoft for the source code, and so access to that was worth a little more.

      When some of the 10 spies that were deported recently were originally placed here, we didn't live with the constant flood of information that we do today. It wasn't as easy as going to washingtonpost.com or reading someone's blog to find out what was going on in the debate on certain issues. You had to wait, for news broadcasts or to get hold of a copy of a paper. Having someone get to know an individual who was an insider and to innocently ask some questions every now and then could actually pay dividends. And once an agency has already invested time and money training operatives, creating their legends and getting them into place, they're not going to just pull them out. They might be useful for something else later. This is type of work is like a marathon, not a sprint.

    4. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bear in mind that Windows 7 is a client OS

      With the same kernel as 2008 Server R2.

    5. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the same kernel as 2008 Server R2.

      Absolutely. But SQL Server, Exchange Server, ConnectPoint, IIS, etc., would all be considered not part of the Windows 7 source code, yes?

    6. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by hodet · · Score: 1

      From the way they operated he may have taken pictures of the secret source code with a Walmart disposable film camera and handed the film off to another operative in a lunch bag at the train station.

    7. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      They wanted the secret of Ballmer's monkey dance!

    8. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Locutus · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't, but he must have figured out that if he was working for a counter intelligence ring then working at Microsoft where everything runs counter to intelligence is the perfect hiding place.

      Remember, the ads for BING are all about there being too many links. You know, links, the things offered to you based on the search criteria you entered. Somehow, fewer links are better. And let's not forget the pretty background which makes you feel happy to see so few responses to your query.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    9. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by motorhead · · Score: 0

      Or the secret to 'Tiny Footprint Mode'

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    10. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking of paying attention, has he actually been formally accused of anything beyond immigration violations?

      The story seems awfully speculative. Good on the feds for doing their diligence, but as far as I can tell, there's no hard evidence linking him to anything.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Speaking of paying attention, has he actually been formally accused of anything beyond immigration violations?

      The article says no. And I'm not surprised that there's no hard evidence linking him to anything. Wouldn't you expect that a Russian counterintelligence agent would necessarily be rather good at hiding his tracks?

    12. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they do not trust Microsoft and suspect them on holding things back.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not all spy work is intelligence gathering. Sometimes it is guidance, carefully maneuvering targets to do things. Who did he go drinking with after work from MS? Who could he have influenced? Sometimes spy work is assassination. Did anyone go missing?

    14. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      And I'm not surprised that there's no hard evidence linking him to anything. Wouldn't you expect that a Russian counterintelligence agent would necessarily be rather good at hiding his tracks?

      Well, that's some terrifying logic right there. He turned me into a newt!

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    15. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Clippy?
      You appear to be running a spy ring. Do you want help with that?

    16. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, those are applications.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of paying attention, has he actually been formally accused of anything beyond immigration violations?

      The story seems awfully speculative. Good on the feds for doing their diligence, but as far as I can tell, there's no hard evidence linking him to anything.

      Why not deport the other law-breaking immigrants...since they're in the mood.

    18. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. ... You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code

      You mean the secret NSA backdoor keys! of course, because they're not in the Windows 7 source code, ok. right. *wink* :)

    19. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Ah, Monty Python and the Holy Grail. I see you what you did there... ;)

    20. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes fewer links are better. Most search results are junk that you aren't looking for. Good search engines reduce the excess and show you just what you want.

    21. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      IIS is a part of Windows 7 (Pro and higher, IIRC).

      The rest of your list aren't part of Windows Server, either.

    22. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that it couldn't be shipped on it's own, but IIS is part of Windows. Like ADDS, ADFS, DNS server, Hyper-V, WSUS... http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/r2-compare-roles.aspx

      Of course server products like Exchange, SQL, SharePoint... are not part of Windows.

    23. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      I think the Russians may be interested on how much Microsoft is vulnerable to USA spies. Having access to the source code doesn't guarantee that the final builds are not modified with NSA rootkits.

    24. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I've been thinking. Considering they have to sign confessions in order to be "pardoned" by Russia even. . . why would Russia require them to sign confessions of being Russian spies before being "pardoned". Pardoned by Russia for being spies of Russia? THat doesn't make any logical sense. Why would Russia be requiring their own spies to sign a confession of being spies for Russia? *scratching my head*

      Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

      Methinks just a "test ballon" to see if they can kick off a new cold war, since public dissent and anger at government is at an unprecedented high. The USSR and the USA both benefitted from the Cold War. Behind the scenes, it was all handshakes and smiles. Warfare the oldschool way (two friends agree to wage war against each other to keep their respective populations under control, while pretending publically WWF style to be bitter enemies).

    25. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS didn't just give them the source code to Windows 7. Reread the other article and you'll see that they already gave them the source for Windows 7, MS Office, Server 2008 and SQL Server.

    26. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, amazing to see the cold war sentimentality is not dead and buried. You've gotta have enemies to pep the population and stir up some good ol' patriotism.

      I propose an old fashioned communist hunt, crack down on all russian immigrants. Accuse them of being spies and send them of to labor camps without any legal representation and extort russia to free detained US spies...

    27. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But.. but... he's a Russian! He's obviously a secret KGB agent and a commie who's hell-bent on destroying our way of life because he hates America!

    28. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sometimes spy work is assassination. Did anyone go missing?

      I don't think anyone at Microsoft has seen Bill Gates for a while now...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      fewer links are better only if you are 100% sure both you and the search engine know exactly what you are looking for and every web page on the subject matches how you and the search engine see the world.

      so most search results are junk, don't go looking at page 40 for things you are searching for.

      FYI, the web is a very large place and there's lots of information out there. So, a good search engine will give you lists of possible results to your query and show you them in order of relevance.

      Showing only the top 3 or 4 relevant links and claiming all other links are terrible and you'll loose your girl because of it is dumb. But maybe BING is for the dumb and dumber types who see lists as confusing. That sounds about right for Microsoft. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    30. Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they do not trust Microsoft and suspect them on holding things back.

      Then I guess that makes all of us honorary Russians.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. Worked for M$? by koan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't that be something if you could rootkit a master ISO for M$'s Windows retail disk.

    It would explain so much...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Worked for M$? by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Testers don't write product code.

    2. Re:Worked for M$? by koan · · Score: 1

      Russian spy with access to M$'s internal network and security policies, if he knew how to hack how further could he have gotten?

      The ultimate (well to me) put a kit on a master iso that gets released in the 10's of thousands if not more.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    3. Re:Worked for M$? by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bug #12512523512
      Issue: Windows does not have Russian rootkit installed
      Status: Critical

      Steps to Reproduce:
      1) Install Windows
      2) KGB unable to access Windows remotely with secret password
      3)
      ---
      Reply: Thank you for your feedback, we believe the latest build fixes your problem!

      Status: FIXED

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Worked for M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testers don't have source code access. Almost no one has access (not even most product coders) to the building where master ISO's are created.

    5. Re:Worked for M$? by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      Counterespionage. Maybe not from her position... but she may have detected CIA spies within Microsoft that are in that position. After all, Russians also use Windows.

  7. What we all suspected is true! by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess it's official -- Microsoft IS spyware!

    1. Re:What we all suspected is true! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Odd, I found this in my task manager...

      Image Name | Username | CPU | Memory | Description
      rpt2kgb.exe| System . . .| 3 . . . | 13,900k | For the Motherland

      I guess I just never noticed it before now.

    2. Re:What we all suspected is true! by rphy · · Score: 1

      lol! u made my day.. thank you.

    3. Re:What we all suspected is true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you had the Red Screen Of Death, yet?

  8. The reason this is an issue by volkerdi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is because Microsoft's source is closed, and a spy might have a chance to find a hole in the source code that's not obvious without the source code, or possibly would have a chance to plant something in the code. On the other hand, spies are welcome to contribute to open source. They won't be able to slip much past the massive peer review.

    1. Re:The reason this is an issue by SquarePixel · · Score: 1

      Is because Microsoft's source is closed, and a spy might have a chance to find a hole in the source code that's not obvious without the source code

      Why go thru that amount of work when they already have the source code.

    2. Re:The reason this is an issue by AmaranthineNight · · Score: 1

      Except for the little detail here:

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency

      Not really that necessary to have a spy poking around in source code that was handed to you on a silver platter, huh?

    3. Re:The reason this is an issue by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      It might be nice to verify that you were given the same code as the actual... of course with all the hotfixes and SP releases, who can tell?

    4. Re:The reason this is an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They won't be able to slip much past the massive peer review.

      You mean the same "massive peer review" that stopped the OpenSSL bug that was committed by a Debian developer or the same review process that spotted the trojan in UnrealIRCD? Oh wait, it missed both of those things.

    5. Re:The reason this is an issue by KillShill · · Score: 1

      You have the same issues in the open source world. Granted, it's slightly better in that anyone can look at the code but how many people can trust trust? Or how many can decode "Obfuscated C"?

      Obfuscation takes care of the software side.... CPU microcode deals with the hardware end and then there are the actual circuits of the processors... remember how they etched "bill sucks" on an Intel (ironic name eh?) CPU? What other goodies are on the chips that go into the worlds systems? Undocumented features? http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=undocumented+x86

      The only computer/compiler/software you can trust is one you build yourself from scratch. Anything else has varying degrees of mistrust.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    6. Re:The reason this is an issue by hedwards · · Score: 1

      If it's written in obfuscated C, then it needs to be rewritten anyways. If you can't read it, then you can't maintain or add on to it properly. Poorly formatted code is buggy code, or at least it damn well better not be as you're not going to find the bug hiding in that crap without a lot of effort.

    7. Re:The reason this is an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the same "massive peer review" that stopped the OpenSSL bug that was committed by a Debian developer or the same review process that spotted the trojan in UnrealIRCD? Oh wait, it missed both of those things.

      If they were never found and fixed during peer review, how the hell would you even KNOW about them to make that statement?!

      You only proved that flaws in open source DO get discovered and fixed, proving the GP right, yourself wrong, and being an asshole in the process.

    8. Re:The reason this is an issue by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      They got discovered and fixed, which is good.

      They got into production releases, which is not. They shouldn't have been in the stable release, only nightlies.

    9. Re:The reason this is an issue by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "The reason this is an issue Is because Microsoft's source is closed"

      Or not.

      One of the biggest "spy issues" post Perestroika was about bussiness negotiations for airliners (Boeing vs Airbus). Being Microsoft the big company it is you can bet foreing countries intelligences want to know what's happening inside and that has nothing to do with source code.

    10. Re:The reason this is an issue by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      LOLWAT?

  9. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this spy stuff is nothing but national PR. Any real spies...would be quietly dealt with, instead of publicly. The only reason that Spyring was busted was so that they'd have a reason to swap them for some other guys who got busted.

    It's nothing more than a little quid pro quo. The Russians get to look good for busting some spies. The US gets to look good for busting some spies. They both get to look good to their spies for exchanging them.

    Everybody goes home happy, it's a fun game, next time there will be pie and fruit punch.

    Or something.

    But I guarantee the real spy stuff? Never mentioned. Might as well be watching Chuck or Covert Affairs.

  10. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft works for you

  11. Oh no, it's starting! by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Funny

    "So, I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good at their logs for that time."

    He stole that word (I assume it was "look") from right under your nose! We are in some serious trouble!

    1. Re:Oh no, it's starting! by louic · · Score: 1

      Log files? Are they running Linux at MS?

  12. My boyfriend is Russian of Nigerian origin by bigfootchick · · Score: 1

    Dang my boyfriend is Rissian-Nigerian and I need to do a background check on him. I gave him a lot of my money and bought computers for him. Anyone knows a PI?

    1. Re:My boyfriend is Russian of Nigerian origin by middlemen · · Score: 1

      Well you seem to have a big foot (as per your slashdot id), so maybe you can kick him with it and find out.

    2. Re:My boyfriend is Russian of Nigerian origin by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am. Go ahead and send some money to my account in Nigeria and I will look into him for you.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:My boyfriend is Russian of Nigerian origin by RRRussian · · Score: 1

      Sorry baby, the money's all spent and the computers are going to good use. Enjoy the T-shirt!

  13. Where else... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    I think the brown zune was clear proof that counter-intelligence is often found in Microsoft.

  14. Reminds me of Civ4 by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    You've stumbled across a Russian Spy near Redmond!

  15. Modern Spying by painandgreed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Welcome to the new world of modern espionage. In a world where countries are less worried about invading each other than preserving and succeeding in a stable international economic market, your spies are going to be mostly industrial in nature. Who doesn't think that the CIA is out there trying to figure out what other countries are stealing from our corporations or what we can steal from somebody else's? My real wonder is how we would introduce that knowledge into our side if we got it as it would be a large potential PR blow up. Countries spying on each others military secrets is almost expected, but countries spying on other countries corporate interests so they can turn such knowledge over to their own corporate interests might actually mean war.

    1. Re:Modern Spying by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Protecting corporate IP interests suddenly became state's job as well: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/1659255/US-Pirate-Movie-Site-DNS-Seizure-Fail

    2. Re:Modern Spying by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "CIA ... trying to figure out what other countries are stealing from our corporations or what we can steal from somebody else's"? That's quite a lot of assumptions about the process already... (and actually it seems like it was, also & in singular case, sort of the other way around)

      Anyway, why it would be such a big practical problem? Think insider trading type of stuff; and leverage in international treaties.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Modern Spying by alen · · Score: 1

      i've seen news specials about this 20 years ago after the wall first fell. as soon as the warsaw pact fell apart the french and some of our allies started spying on us

    4. Re:Modern Spying by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i've seen news specials about this 20 years ago after the wall first fell. as soon as the warsaw pact fell apart the french and some of our allies started spying on us

      Did they ever stop?

      I've always assumed that every country spies on every other country, at least to some minimal extent.

      Obviously, if you're the US, you don't commit a *lot* of resources to spying on, say, Canada. But there'd be at least a small team responsible. And in that Canadian Bacon movie, all the dirt they dug up on Canada came in handy.

    5. Re:Modern Spying by PagosaSam · · Score: 1
      CIA official: Senator, our network just picked up something that might be useful for your re-election campaign efforts. Just remember who's your friend when our re-appropriation comes up... wink, wink.

      Senator: Thanks! (to aide)Get me the lobbyist for XYZ corp!
      Lobbyist: Thanks Senator, here's a check for your re-election campaign.
      Senator: Thanks a million! (giggle) Oh by the way here's a little something you boys might find interesting. (hands over folder...)

      See that wasn't so hard, now was it?

      --
      :q! Oh crap, not again...
    6. Re:Modern Spying by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      French intelligence, DGSE, is the only one that I know to admit that about 25% of their budget is for corporate espionage.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  16. Worked as an Entry Level Tester at Microsoft...? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    OMG AM I A SPY?

  17. Useless Speculation by Nailer235 · · Score: 1

    Really, absent evidence that he stole something, is this news in any way? He was on American soil for ten years, maybe he hacked into America's weapons arsenals too?

  18. Privacy by immakiku · · Score: 1

    You know people stopped caring about privacy when even spies put their details on Facebook.

  19. Re:Worked as an Entry Level Tester at Microsoft... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Depends, are you good at taking out heavies and sapping turrets?

  20. for great justice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all your BSOD are belong to us!

  21. He's not alone by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    The MS spy has a counterpart at Apple too. He's doing the same kind of spying, only he's more smug and pretentious about it.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:He's not alone by bwintx · · Score: 2, Funny

      The MS spy has a counterpart at Apple too. He's doing the same kind of spying, only he's more smug and pretentious about it.

      Fortunately, the Apple spy doesn't hold his phone correctly, so he can't tell Moscow what he's learned. Whew.

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    2. Re:He's not alone by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 1

      So THAT's what happened to the antenna!

      --
      Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    3. Re:He's not alone by Odetta2012 · · Score: 1

      He's doing the same kind of spying at Apple, but he drives a Prius, and hates South Park, and loves to talk about how he hates hateful comments.

    4. Re:He's not alone by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      T h a n k s

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  22. Proof positive by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0, Troll

    I always suspected that Windows amounted to sabotage!

  23. This could have been a disaster ... for Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out he was trying to steal the source code for Clippy.

  24. Derp by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    The four Russians who were flown to Britain and the US had to first sign a confession before President Medvedev granted them pardons.

    It's hard to pardon somebody when they've admitted no wrongdoing.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Derp by RML · · Score: 1

      That didn't stop Gerald Ford.

      --
      Human/Ranger/Zangband
    2. Re:Derp by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Ford's reasoning was that accepting the pardon was the same as admitting guilt.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  25. Now that they have it by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1

    Just what will they do with the source for Bob?

    1. Re:Now that they have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Activate the module that asks you "It looks like you're trying to cause a world-wide nuclear war, can I help you with that?"

  26. College faculty and students have access too by perpenso · · Score: 2, Informative

    microsoft has freely given its source code to the kgb (rolls eyes):

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency

    It's not just governments. Microsoft gives some college faculty and students complete access to Windows source code. They have to be part of a research team doing something Microsoft finds interesting, sign NDAs, etc. Microsoft gets access to their work but there are no restrictions on publishing their research. A friend was on such a team when he was a grad student.

  27. Facebook by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    He should have been more careful with putting "Spying @ Microsoft" as his occupation on Facebook

  28. That explains Vista... by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    ...it was a Russian plot.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  29. he worked for MS? Is this now in the code... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has encountered an error, what would you like to do?

    - Send information to Microsoft to help us troubleshoot this problem

    - Send information home to mother russia to help your spy agency take down those capitalist dogs

    - Do nothing

  30. He was also deported quite quickly by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The man in the story was deported quickly, too quickly for intelligence services to wring him dry. When spies like him get caught, you need to do a thorough damage assessment, to find out exactly what they knew and how they got the information in the first place. If he penetrated Microsoft, we needed to know everything about it, what he got, how he got it, and who gave it to him. Why so fast? "the prospect of a public trial revealing embarrassing facts about Russian influence operations, like the targeting of a key Democratic Party financier close to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton." The [FBI's] criminal complaint stated that in February 2009 a New Jersey-based Russian, who posed as Cynthia Murphy and was later identified as SVR officer Lydia Guryev, met several times with a "prominent New York-based financier" who was active in politics and a "active fundraiser" for a "major political party, name omitted." He also was described as a "personal friend of [a current Cabinet official, name omitted]." Source. You can fill in the [name omitted] yourself - go ahead and guess.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  31. Yeah, He quit by Duane13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After 6 months of examining the source code, he determined that there are so many security holes that he was wasting his time there and moved on to software that would be a challenge to crack.

  32. What a deep thought... by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 1

    Because we should always trust the observations of people who say "He may have got in". There's a better way, my friend.

  33. If he was there to change code, he probably did it by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Maybe Microsoft has tightened security in the last few years, but I doubt it. The network is pretty wide open and it isn't run like some sort of movie company with real security. A smart enough guy would be able to get in and do what ever they wanted. People routinely work at all hours and leave their computers running in offices with open doors. Screen savers aren't always password protected.

    So, if he was trying to put something into windows, then it s probably there

  34. What more do they want ? by cheap.computer · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/government/microsoft-turns-over-all-win7-and-server-source-code-to-russias-new-kgb/9191 So they already have the source code for W7, they probably need someone inside of msft so that bugs they find in the code will get fixed...

  35. I am not worried by microbee · · Score: 1

    It should only affect the Russian version of Windows.

  36. shows who the global elite are, who rule the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nations, patriotism, economics, terrorism, internet safety, DRM, all part of a bunch of tools used by the rich across the world to keep the rest of the population under control. The world is still ruled by monarchs and dynasties, HNIs and MNCs they support / invest in. All parties of all countries have to interface with the global elite organization every now and then. It's not an out-and-out conspiracy like the tinfoilers of HAARP, Bilderberg, aliens, UFOs, etc would have you believe, but it surely is a nice hierarchy with a proper chain of command even though individual levels might not know the entire structure fully.
    Of course, there are shifting alliances, betrayals, compromise pacts, agreements, settlements and so on.
    But the aim of most of them at the top is to keep the rest of us busy fighting to survive or busy getting seduced by a variety of pleasures, while they retain control over world or national politics, depending on where they are in the structure.

    The key thing is that amongst themselves, they are symbiotic, while with the rest of us, they are parasitic, but we cant see through a layer of obfuscation and deliberate misguidance using tools like legal systems, constitutions, coups, insurgencies, strip mining for resources, and so on,

    Heavy Ferengi interference in governance at all levels, in most geographies.
    Money, greed and temptation are indeed a very powerful tools to make masses of humans play to your tunes.

    Indeed the elite are global. It would be interesting if supercomputer simulations of such dynamics can be created and studied. Will give great insight into how to form and break these groups, and what holds them together so well, that everyone who does not look hard, gets fooled.

  37. No Secret Smirnoff by sgt_doom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Exactly! Evidently everyone has forgotten that no too long ago Micro$oft opened up their Windows source code to the Peoples Republic of China, a k a the Totalitarian Fascist State, etc.

    The only secret this tovarisch picked up was free yogurt, softdrinks and coffee at MS....

  38. Re:Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can take a /. troll out of his mother's basement... Oh wait, you can't.

  39. Uncle Bob...or was it Uncle Ralph? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    Dood! Morgan greywolf! You are on to something, big buy!

    They evidently heard of the infamous "Uncle Bob" interface written by Mrs. Microsoft (Melissa French Gates), and had to have it......

  40. Re:Worked as an Entry Level Tester at Microsoft... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    No, you're a sleeper. Get back to work.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  41. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone checked Steve B. lately?

  42. Double Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CIA PLANT.
    It's clear he's a double agent. Give them MS stuff and they'll be crashing for years, BSOD missile systems etc etc. Brilliant.

  43. If Microsoft Has Given Source Code To Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then, surely, they have volunteereed the source code to the U.S.A..

    I'll let you speculate about what Google has given Team U.S.A.

    Yours In Novosibirsk,
    K. Trout

  44. Bill gates... traitor? by xmorg · · Score: 1

    This just goes to show you that bill gates is a traitor and he needs to immediately resign from m$, discontinue the Xbox360, and put balmer is a padded cell.

    Charges:
    Consorting with Russian spies
    General espionage and cyber terror of PC's around the world.

    Evidence
    This article
    the "RED" ring on death on the xbox 360... did i mention that it was RED!!!!! For those of you who dont know, red is the color for commies long before it was "Assigned" to US republicans.

  45. It's a cover by f3rret · · Score: 1

    Now assuming this dude really was a spy as opposed to someone who was just hanging out with spies then why are you assuming his job at MS was anything but a cover?

    It does not make sense to have your deep cover operative do his deep cover work at a place where he is known (well as known as an office drone can be).

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  46. Thinking by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    [...] worked as an entry-level software tester [...] I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good [look] at their logs for that time.

    Wow, thinking is hard, huh.

    1. Re:Thinking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Microsoft, testers aren't the guys who click buttons with a mouse. They write code - a lot of it - for automated tests and their infrastructure. It is reflected in position names, too - devs are "Software Design Engineers", testers are "Software Design Engineers in Test". Compensations between the two are on par, as well.

      (Indeed, it's often possible to find a SDET who is more technically apt than many SDEs on the same team.)

      Naturally, a "tester" like that would have access to more internal resources than you'd think. Not that it changes much, though, since there's hardly anything of interest to Russian (or, indeed, any) special services in there. They can get the source code to most interesting bits just by asking, anyway, and FSB in particular already did that for XP in the past, and more recently, for Win7.

  47. he was really a counter-spy for USA by peter303 · · Score: 1

    He convinced Russia to use insecure version of MSFT-OS all over Russia so the NSA could easily crack their computers, not to mention 8-year old computer geeks.

  48. Code is cheap by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

    Ah... now here's someone who has been paying attention

    Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. Microsoft does a lot more than Windows; maybe this had to do with Office, Microsoft's online service offerings, Exchange Server, SQL Server etc. You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code (bear in mind that Windows 7 is a client OS)

    Or more likely, business strategy, research & development direction, or contract bid pricing. Only a geek would assume he was in it for teh codez.

    1. Re:Code is cheap by gbjbaanb · · Score: 0

      Or more likely, business strategy, research & development direction, or contract bid pricing

      Microsoft has any of those things?

  49. Re:shows who the global elite are, who rule the wo by PagosaSam · · Score: 1
    "Heavy Ferengi interference in governance at all levels..."
    .

    Your ideas intrigue me, how do I subscribe to your news letter?

    --
    :q! Oh crap, not again...
  50. It'd only be a matter of time anyhow though... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "microsoft has freely given its source code to the kgb (rolls eyes):" - by circletimessquare (444983) > on Wednesday July 14, @02:51PM (#32904620) Homepage

    Per my subject-line above: IF the Russians wanted to know the "ins-N-outs" of Windows code, in ANY version, they would do the same as guys like Dr. Mark Russinovich did prior to his actually working for Microsoft (while he was the co-coder for SysInternals/Winternals, alongside Bryce Cogswell) - they'd disassemble/debug it, & have their answers. From what I understand, Mark Russinovich did all he did figuring out the "Native Mode NT code" via this method and using what's provided in the Microsoft DDK (Device Driver Kit).

    Sure, this'd take more time than having actual sourcecode in the language it's written in (for kernel level stuff, that'd be C &/or Assembly language (which is what the debug trace dumps would yield in the latter anyhow), & the rest of the OS in usermode would most likely be a lot of C++)), but the results would be the same anyhow...

    Guys - it's NOT like the russians don't have the kind of coding talent necessary (far from it) for that to happen... & again, it'd only be a matter of time is all.

    APK

    P.S.=> I used to try to "obfuscate" code I wrote, & also use executable compressors too, to make this harder on others attempting to do this, but I soon found out "what's the point"? See, those same "reverse engineers" developed unpackers to stop that method of trying to "slow down" those trying to get at what your code's doing (e.g.-> Shrinker is now broken & can be "unshrunk", as a single example thereof, & it only took about 1.5 yrs. for such a tool like UnShrink to appear publicly online) too!

    PLUS, you can always peer into that app's memory space via it's hWnd address in RAM, & see what's going on as well rather than toying with the .exe file on disk to get your answers also (Dr. Mark Russinovich's "Process Explorer" will do this very thing for you in fact as one of its options, for example)... apk

  51. I will believe they are serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they start deporting Chinese spies that work at Microsoft. And Google. And...

  52. Vlads OK by decula03 · · Score: 1

    Did anybody think to open the control panel and search the Espionage Viewer? Oh Damn! Somebody rebooted!

    1. Re:Vlads OK by silveride · · Score: 1

      No. But I found automatic updates. Is it sending something to mother russia ?

    2. Re:Vlads OK by decula03 · · Score: 1

      Not until Windows 13, or whatever it was that he was working on.

  53. Our Friend by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    A Russian spy getting access to Microsoft's secrets might be a real boon to America. Perhaps we will learn what goes on there as well as if our government plays games with the OSs offered for sale. What better tool to spy upon people than their own operating system?

  54. Re:If he was there to change code, he probably did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What parent says is still 100% true.

  55. Product Manager for the Kin Phone?? by rlp · · Score: 1

    So THAT explains it!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  56. Moreover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFS: "So, I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good at their logs for that time. He may have got in at 'entry-level' but his abilities may have been a fair bit beyond that ..."

    No, dear subtropolis, this isn't your private conspiracy theory weblog, this is Slashdot. Just the summary, please.

  57. I don't by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Who doesn't think that the CIA is out there trying to figure out what other countries are stealing from our corporations or what we can steal from somebody else's?

    Perhaps they are doing the first thing. But the second?

    Who would the CIA tell? Would they just go to some random company and say "have some cool tech we just discovered"?

    Government spying agencies being more along the lines of industrial espionage make more sense when you have industries that are more governmental entities than private companies.

    Although we do have GM now... hmm.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. Re:shows who the global elite are, who rule the wo by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    It's not an out-and-out conspiracy like the tinfoilers of HAARP, Bilderberg, aliens, UFOs, etc would have you believe

    Everything else you said is more or less correct, except that mind control and "aliens" are indeed also part of the mix. Anybody who bothers to research the issue will figure that one out quickly enough -if their minds are strong enough to conduct that much current without their breaker circuits popping.

    Crop Circles made with planks and ropes wouldn't display any of the true oddities observed in the fields. You know; things like like magnetic seeds. It's astonishing that when such evidence is dumped right in front of the world, most people are capable of tuning it out.

    The population isn't mind controlled? Oh, really?

    -FL

  59. Re:If he was there to change code, he probably did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was more fun when you could send mail from someone's workstation to iisisuck.

  60. so what you are saying is by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    bing is a case of kgb industrial sabotage?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  61. Confused by Lando · · Score: 1

    What does it matter if he was or wasn't a spy and was working at Microsoft? Do people actually believe that Microsoft software is in any way secure? It's rather easy to install a key logger remotely on a Windows machine, so easy in fact there is no reason to actually consider Microsoft is in any way secure.

    Am I wrong or does the EULA basically say that nothing that Microsoft holds no responsibility for any actions that the operating system does. Furthermore, don't they basically advertise the fact that the system isn't secure in the first place and "suggest" you install third party software in order to try to prevent common worms and viruses?

    So why in the world would someone more or less, no matter what their nationality, make me any more or less comfortable about the basic operating system in the first place?

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  62. going home by Max_W · · Score: 1

    These stories are going to influence many Russians working abroad and who has nothing to do with an espionage.

    Reputation of being from Eastern Europe is not a joke in itself. It is no surprise and in a way deserved since indeed there are a lot of criminals and vagabonds, who moved to the West and are noticeable. By the way, we also do not like the same criminals at the East ourselves.

    But now after these spy stories people are just scared and confused when they hear a Russian name in a business context. Seeing and feeling it many Russians are going probably to decide to return back to Russia. Why not, if a "glass ceiling" moves lower and there is no future at the West for them?

    In a rich and developed country the departure of several thousand Russian specialists probably will not be even noticeable for the economy, but for Russian economy the arrival of these thousands of specialists with real experience of Western companies would be a major event.

    It is not "secrets" what are important, sometimes it is just setting a company website, e-mail system. They will bring with them understanding, habits and know-hows and will influence their new companies.

  63. You read the WashTimes? by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Please note that they seem to have gotten that news 2 weeks after the Washington Post reported it:

    One of these friends may have been Alan Patricof, a Democratic fundraiser and friend of the Clintons.

  64. Re:This is bullshit. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Weird. Modded down to -1? Wow. What did I say to inspire that kind of response? Curious. Usually I can predict when people are going to get upset by the things I write, so I have to say, this kind of surprises me. Are people truly THAT offended by the idea of somebody laughing at a poorly executed bit of made-up spy drama? I don't get it.

    Ah well. Here's a repost...

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

    This is a circus event.

    You can tell because the idea of the "Russian Spy" and the "Cold War 2.0" has been seeded into our population for the last year through film and television. It's a total con job.

    And anyway, reporting spy craft with such bells and whistles is idiotic. It's only done to sculpt public awareness. And if you look at these so-called, "Spies", (the list of their crimes is idiotic at best), you'll note that, actually, the only spy craft going on is that of American COINTELPRO style bullshit misdirection aimed squarely at the public.

    I mean, these "spies" were not actually charged with espionage but rather with, "failing to register as agents of a foreign government." That is, they were accused of "trying to seek out and develop ties and friendships in policy circles of the United States and send back reports." (Um, you mean, like what diplomats and businessmen do every day in capital cities all over the world?)

    One set of charges was brought against Vicky Pelaez, an American columnist for the Spanish-language El Diario newspaper for more than 20 years. Was she even aware that her husband of 30 years was a Russian spy? It's interesting that her 'political' activities mark her out as an 'enemy of the state' in the US these days:

    In her column, Vicky Pelaez discusses social issues and has taken a stand as a supporter of socialist governments in Latin America, including Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia, and against the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Her articles also advocate for the rights of Indigenous peoples and undocumented immigrants in the U.S. while criticizing the foreign policies of the U.S. in Latin America.

    Because of her political ideas and activism, most of Pelaez friends and supporters believe that she is the subject of political persecution, that she is completely innocent.

    Another one of the arrested individuals, Anna Chapman, was said to have "met with an individual purporting to be a Russian Government official in Manhattan, New York, at which she received a fraudulent passport," according to the official criminal report.

    Chapman, however, immediately went to the local police and gave them the passport.

    CNN reported that Chapman never "fulfilled the mission" of delivering the fraudulent passport that the undercover FBI agent gave to her.

    Set 'em up and knock 'em down. And passports and microfilm? This was designed for public consumption, and not just any public, but a really dumbed down public only capable of understanding spy dramas as per the Disney version.

    So the question is this. . .

    What is REALLY going on? What is this supposed to achieve? How would increased tensions between the old cold war super-powers benefit the elite?

    I guess we'll just have to wait and see, (because people are obviously too far gone as a society to not fall for this kind of silly tactic.)

    -FL

  65. Busted! by triso · · Score: 1

    Hmm! Microsoft has nothing worth stealing unless they wanted the QuickBasic source to Bob.