Slashdot Mirror


X-Ray Burst Temporarily Blinds NASA Satellite

RedEaredSlider writes with news that a recently-detected gamma-ray burst, originating roughly five billion light-years away, was powerful enough to temporarily blind NASA's Swift satellite. Phil Plait has an interesting writeup on the event. Quoting: "Swift, normally easily able to handle the X-ray load from these explosions, was overwhelmed, and actually shut down temporarily when software detected that the cameras onboard might get damaged by the flood of light. That’s never happened before. The burst was so bright in X-rays it put other GRBs to shame: slamming Swift with 143,000 X-ray photons per second, it was 5 times brighter than the previous record holder, and nearly 200 times as bright as a typical GRB! Weirdly, it didn’t look out of the ordinary in visible light."

117 comments

  1. Superman Also Affected by Kepesk · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a tragedy reported today, Superman was looking at the sky during the GRB event and was blinded due to his X-ray vision. Reports say that he is now training with a seeing-eye falcon.

    1. Re:Superman Also Affected by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if any of the ISS crew are feeling stretchy or hot or strong or invisible...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Superman Also Affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or hard and stiff!

    3. Re:Superman Also Affected by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Posting to undo fat-fingered mod. Sorry.

    4. Re:Superman Also Affected by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>invisible.

      Aaaaah..... Jessica... Alba... without clothes..... gaaaah.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Superman Also Affected by jd · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. Nope, doesn't look like it, but one has either grown an extra arm and head or NASA is replaying HHGTTG again.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Superman Also Affected by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Okay so that describes Jessica Alba, but what about the other three of the fantastic four?

    7. Re:Superman Also Affected by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't Krypto act as an assistance dog?

    8. Re:Superman Also Affected by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with ya, babe.

      Aaaaah..... Jessica... Alba... as Sue Storm..... gaaaaaaaah.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Superman Also Affected by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      but then of course, one of the others sees Jessica Alba writhing there naked and alone... You have to admit it makes an inviting picture (-;

  2. Impressive... by sznupi · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for this LHC to achieve such respectable levels of efficiency.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:Impressive... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      The aliens have discovered us.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Impressive... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, the aliens were just in for their routine medical and the X-Ray scanner went wonky. Nothing to get alarmed about. They were well within the permitted dosage limits, according to medical experts on Omnichron 425.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect, good sir.

      It was simply one of the test full body scanners at the local space shuttle landing site that just went into use.

      The authorities lauded the trial as full success.

  3. RUN!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    I think there has been at least a dozen horror and apocalyptic films that have started with this exact event.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:RUN!! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Instant movie formula:

      The X-rays* are boiling the Earth's Core? That's Impossible!

      *Substitute X-rays for Neutrinos, Beta Waves, Gamma Radiation, C02 gasses, or whatever scares most people at the current time.

    2. Re:RUN!! by Jeng · · Score: 3, Funny

      or whatever scares most people at the current time.

      Dick Cheney?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:RUN!! by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I think there has been at least a dozen horror and apocalyptic films that have started with this exact event.

      Considering this event happened five billion years ago, there's a good possibility it's more than a dozen.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:RUN!! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      If disaster movies are at all accurate, your best chance of survival is to start predicting a global apocalypse.

      Guys should dress somewhat shabbily, women should dress as provocatively as possible, preferably in high heels so you can run effectively from any disaster.

      Be sure you have tons of impossible-to-verify-independently facts and observations, and report your findings to the most fossilized organization possible.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:RUN!! by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      I think there has been at least a dozen horror and apocalyptic films that have started with this exact event.

      Considering this event happened five billion years ago, there's a good possibility it's more than a dozen.

      I don't see how that has anything to do with anything.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    6. Re:RUN!! by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cheney is soooooo last presidency.

    7. Re:RUN!! by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'm good with Cheney hunting laywer under any administration.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:RUN!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

      It also helps if you are impossibly good-looking. Or a child. Or a pet. But is you are cruel to children or pets, you're toast.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    9. Re:RUN!! by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      or whatever scares most people at the current time.

      Dick Cheney?

      Seriously? The man's been out of office for a year and a half & has a heart attack every time there is a 5 degree temperature change. Unless you are going hunting with him, what's there to be afraid of?

    10. Re:RUN!! by NiceGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That is not dead which can eternal lie"

    11. Re:RUN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people spell "CO2" with a zero? The chemical symbol for Oxygen is not zero!

    12. Re:RUN!! by jd · · Score: 1

      In Los Angeles it is.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:RUN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Madame Curie has now been minimized to just another old hag with boob cancer?

    14. Re:RUN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? The man's been out of office for a year and a half & has a heart attack every time there is a 5 degree temperature change. Unless you are going hunting with him, what's there to be afraid of?

      According to recent news, he may soon be in need of a heart transplant. Ever see "Repo: the Genetic Opera"? Better lock your doors and windows... ;)

    15. Re:RUN!! by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Cheney is soooooo last presidency.

      Undead Cheney is sooooooooo last century.

  4. She Blinded Me With Science by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

    She Blinded Me With Science. Did you know Thomas Dolby is touring again, btw?

  5. At least they... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only fired off one Halo

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:At least they... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Nah, they all fired at the same time.

      We just haven't detected the others yet.

      This was just the "muzzle flash", wait till the full blast wave hits.

  6. To which the GRB source replied: by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Ha, ha, made you blink!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:To which the GRB source replied: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's two for flinching.

    2. Re:To which the GRB source replied: by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Considering it's five billion years down and takes another five billion years for the blink to get back, this must be a Guiness record for world's longest practical joke.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:To which the GRB source replied: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Christianity kicks it feet in the dirt for loosing the title.

    4. Re:To which the GRB source replied: by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Actually, Guiness is only for human-based titles. The book that holds universal records sadly has a name written with Unicode characters which Slashdot refuses to display.

  7. 3 times fast ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betelgeuse! Betelgeuse! Betelgeuse!

  8. Damn those by NEDHead · · Score: 0

    intergalactic spaceport screening systems

  9. Weirdly? by EkriirkE · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it is quite weird that X-Rays weren't visible in "visible light"... seeing how the visible light spectrum doesn't even remotely include x-ray...

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Weirdly? by kalirion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe the implication is that an event that could cause such a burst should show up as out of the ordinary across the spectrum?

    2. Re:Weirdly? by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it's odd that the x-ray burst wasn't accompanied by other frequencies. But not that odd.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Weirdly? by mrsquid0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not unusual for gamma-ray bursts to have X-ray afterglows, but no optical afterglows. About 95% of gamma-ray bursts have X-ray afterglows, but only about 60% have optical or infrared afterglows. The reason is that if there is a clump of dust between us and the gamma-ray burst the X-rays will go through, but the optical light will be scattered and never reach us.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  10. Typical alien cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    nm

  11. Some perspective by cosm · · Score: 1

    (143,000, photons /second) x (h, Planck's constant in j-s) x (c, speed of light (in m/s)) / (avg wavelength of x-ray) = (6.63E-32)(3E8)(143,000)/(5E-9) = ~5.68E-10 J/S

    Amirite?

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Some perspective by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How much is that in Libraries of Congress?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Some perspective by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You got your wavelength wrong. As nobody uses wavelength for x-rays anyway (well almost nobody...),the straightforward way would be:
      Number of photons * Energy of Photons.

      The detector of Swift is sensitive from 15-150keV, so lets say a median energy of 50keV.
      1eV=1.602*10^19J
      ->
      143E3*1.602E-19*50E3= 1.15 nW

      Now much, but consider: 1.15nW on each squre meter surface of a sphere with 5 billion lightyears radius...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Some perspective by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      (143,000, photons /second) x (h, Planck's constant in j-s) x (c, speed of light (in m/s)) / (avg wavelength of x-ray) = (6.63E-32)(3E8)(143,000)/(5E-9) = ~5.68E-10 J/S Amirite?

      Technically you may be right, but this is Slashdot, so we need a car analogy:

      5.68E-10 J/S = 5.68E-10 W. The Corvette ZR-1* puts out 476 kW = 476E3W (638 hp). 476E3/5.68E-10 = 8.38028169E14 ~= 838E12

      Moral of this is, one top-of-the-line, stock Corvette could "temporarily blind" over eight hundred trillion NASA satellites. I don't want to know how many sats a Romulan Bird-of-Prey could blind...

      *NASA's from the U.S.A., so we naturally need an car from the same country. An Enzo Ferrari puts out roughly the same power, if you favor a more European analogy.

    4. Re:Some perspective by IQgryn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1.15 nW/m^2 * 4 * pi * (5E9 ly * 9.46E15 m/ly)^2 = 3.22E43 W

      Do we know this wasn't somewhat directed?

    5. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some perspective:

      We're doing XRD (X-ray diffraction) in our lab with a small X-ray tube with a few kW power, but only a few percent of that are turned into X-Rays, only a few percent of that hit the sample, only a few percent of that are diffracted and only a few percent of that hit the detector. We regularly see a few *millions* counts/s.

      So really, 143,000 photons/second is not much X-ray radiation. Nevertheless it is of course impressive given that it comes from very far away!

    6. Re:Some perspective by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do we know this wasn't somewhat directed?

      We assume that they are very directed... rather than assuming that 3.6 e26 grams of matter/antimatter are being annihilated every second (from a quick application of E=mc^2).

      From Wikipedia's entry on Gamma Ray Bursts [emphasis added]:

      Most observed GRBs are believed to be a narrow beam of intense radiation released during a supernova event, as a rapidly rotating, high-mass star collapses to form a black hole.

      The other probable cause of GRB's, the merger or two neutron stars, would also rotate rapidly as the stars moved in more closely (conservation of angular momentum: think of a figure skater pulling in her arms). In both cases there exists a well-defined plane of rotation and emissions expelled along the axes.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    7. Re:Some perspective by eastlight_jim · · Score: 1

      Even if this event is spread over only 1/100 of the surface of a sphere, this energy output is equivalent to the entire output of the milky way, assuming high estimates for number of stars in this galaxy (400 billion or so).It's a truly staggering amount of energy that I don't think humans can appreciate. We all like to bandy about numbers like 10^{nn} without having a clue.

      Space is big.

    8. Re:Some perspective by jackchance · · Score: 1

      Space is big.

      One day i was walking along the street and i did a mental zoom out, looking down at myself like a spec of dust in new york city. Then zoomed out to see NYC as a spec of dust in the region, which was like a spec of dust on the planet which is like a spec of dust in the solar system which is like a spec of dust in the galaxy which is like a spec of dust in the universe.............

      and then i literally fell down. Like my brain blew a fuse.

      If humans had any conception of how small we are in the universe we might stop acting like toddlers fighting for toys. but what would be the fun in that.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
  12. Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some....where.....out there....at a glowing terminal in a galaxy far far away....

    Pinging eth0.sol.andromeda.alphaquadrant.gxy [10.197.19.1] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 10.197.19.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=127
    Request timed out
    Reply from 10.197.19.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=127
    Reply from 10.197.19.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=127

    Ping statistics for 10.197.19.1:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      You mean the whole universe is on a LAN?! Explains much.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    2. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Some observations about the Intergalatic NOC.

      First, they are probably tired of Intergalatic NOC NOC jokes.

      Second, they're probably being sued by Apple for running the iNOC.

      Third, it's nice to see that we're not the only in the Galaxy still stuck on IPV4.

      Fourth, the iNOC seems to have achieved a FTL network connection based on it's ping rate of 0 to a node several light _years_ away. Any idea on how that was done?

    3. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      http://10.197.19.1/ appears to have been slashdotted. All I get in firefox is:

      The connection has timed out

      The server at 10.197.19.1 is taking too long to respond.

      * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
      * If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
      * A Coronal Mass Ejection or other such solar disturbance may be disrupting networks.
      * The planet the host is on may have been demolished to make way for a hyperspace bypass
      * If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    4. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by 2names · · Score: 1

      "Any idea on how that was done?"

      Quantum Entanglement.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    5. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by jd · · Score: 1

      They're wormholing their network traffic.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Even they are having problems rolling out IPv6

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    7. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      The aliens are stuck on DOS too it would seem.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    8. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Palshife · · Score: 1

      I don't know what has me tickled more, the fact that the galaxy is on a private IP network, or that it's on IPv4!

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    9. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not in the Andromeda galaxy...

    10. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way!

      The universe doesn't run Windows.

    11. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Fourth, the iNOC seems to have achieved a FTL network connection based on it's ping rate of 0 to a node several light _years_ away. Any idea on how that was done?

      Magic, naturally.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    12. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    13. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't believe they are still on IPv4.

    14. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by marqs · · Score: 1

      As an former employee at iNOC i can assure you that 10.197.19.1 is up and responding.
      However I can see that there are some problems with the quantum entanglement connection to your solar system.

    15. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

      Wouldn't that be closer to 10^100ms? :P

    16. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying this is a (k)NOC(k) (k)NOC(k) joke?

  13. Aliens by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

    Why are aliens X-raying our satellites? I think Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones should be alerted.

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
  14. Okay, big X-Ray burst used to mask visitors from.. by Qubit · · Score: 1

    ..which planet?

    We can probably blame the MIB (or those they police) for this latest development...

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  15. Later at the press conference... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    ... Doctor Bruce Banner stubbed his toe on a table leg, then declared to the journalists "HULK SMASH!" before smashing his way out through the brick wall.

    1. Re:Later at the press conference... by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      arrrghhh, you beat me to it.

      Big green thumbs up. :)

      --
      WALSTIB!
  16. Reverse square law by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Now what would be interesting is that somebody plug those number into a calculator, and assuming a perfect spherical repartition of the X ray photon, calculate the energy / intensity of the total photon emitted at the moment of the event, in 1 AU radius...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Reverse square law by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Informative

      Last time I looked, "current" theory had GRBs coming from the poles, much like pulsars. This one just happened to be pointing (more or less) at us; we might not even be at the center of the beam.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  17. Now I know... by Neutral_Observer · · Score: 0

    why my big toe was hurting yesterday!

  18. Obsessed with launch costs by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    You try to make the bird so light, and this is the price you will pay down the road.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Obsessed with launch costs by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      What part of "5 times brighter than the previous record holder, and nearly 200 times as bright as a typical GRB" wasn't clear? Do you know of any bridges that are built to withstand 5 times the record max load, or 200 times their average peak load?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Obsessed with launch costs by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any bridges that are built to withstand 5 times the record max load, or 200 times their average peak load?

      Building a bridge that way would depend on how long you want the bridge to remain standing with little or no maintenance.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:Obsessed with launch costs by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      You're being specious again. Besides, Swift's design lifetime is a handful of years. Which, of course, has nothing to do with launch weight (shielding) or max expected input.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Obsessed with launch costs by mrsquid0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story is very sensationalist. All that happened is that the X-ray photons reached the detector faster than they could be recorded. Once the rate of photons slowed down the detector was fine again. This is a fairly normal occurrence for X-ray detectors. Roughly half of all of the gamma-ray bursts that Swift detects have X-ray emission higher than the XRT's coincidence limit.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  19. Blinded by the LIGHT !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    another runner in the night
    Madman drummers bummers
    Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat
    In the dumps with the mumps as the adolescent pumps his way into his hat
    With a boulder on my shoulder feelin kinda older
    I tripped the merry-go-round
    With this very unpleasin sneezin and wheezin
    the calliope crashed to the ground
    The calliope crashed to the ground
    But she was
    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    runner in the night

    Some silicone sister with a manager mister told me I go what it takes
    She said "Ill turn you on sonny to something strong
    play the song with the funky break"
    And go-cart Mozart was checkin out the weather chart to see if it was safe outside
    And little Early-Pearly came by in his curly-wurly and asked me if I needed a ride
    Asked me if I needed a ride
    But she was
    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    She got down but she never got tired
    Shes gonna make it through the night
    Shes gonna make it through the night
    But mama thats where the fun is
    But mama thats where the fun is
    Mama always told me not to look into the eyes of the sun
    But mama thats where the fun is
    Some brimstone baritone anticyclone rolling stone preacher from the east
    Says "Dethrone the dictaphone hit it in its funny bone
    thats where they expect it least"
    And some new-mown chaperone was standin in the corner
    watching the young girls dance
    And some fresh-sown moonstone was messin with his frozen zone reminding him of romance
    The calliope crashed to the ground
    But she was
    Blinded by the light
    revved up like a deuce
    another runner in the night

    Madman drummers bummers Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat
    In the dumps with the mumps as the adolescent pumps his way into his hat
    With a boulder on my shoulder feelin kinda older
    I tripped the merry-go-round
    With this very unpleasin sneezin and wheezin
    the calliope crashed to the ground
    Now Scott with a slingshot finially found a tender spot and throws his lover in the sand
    And some bloodshot forget-me-not said daddys within earshot save the buckshot turn up the band
    Some silicone sister with a manager mister told me I go what it takes
    She said "Ill turn you on sonny to something strong"

    1. Re:Blinded by the LIGHT !! by sabernet · · Score: 1

      Doc Bruce Banner,
      Belted by gamma rays,
      Turned into the Hulk.

      Ain’t he unglamo-rays!

      Wreckin’ the town
      With the power of a bull,

      Ain’t no monster clown
      Who is as lovable.

      As ever-lovin’ Hulk! HULK!! HULK!!"

  20. Visible light SETI by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Obviously, this was an attempt by the Chela at Optical SETI.

    It's not their fault we have a different definition of "optical"....

    1. Re:Visible light SETI by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      This may have been the flash from a starquake!! We need to mount a rescue mission at once!

  21. Holy photons, Batman! by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1

    If I'm doing my calculations correctly, I get a figure of ~1.436 x 10^57 photons per second coming from the source, assuming a fully spherical distribution...

    --
    GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    1. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I managed somehow to screw radius/diameter in my haste, the corrected figure would be ~1.449 x 10^58...

      --
      GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    2. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      The distribution is not spherical. Gamma-ray burst are thought to be beamed into jets with opening angles of about 1-10 degrees.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    3. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Current theories have GRB emissions coming from the stars poles instead of evenly around the whole star. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst_emission_mechanisms#Jet_effects)

      Either way, it's still a lot of photons!

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      So, to double check, count them!

    5. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "assuming a fully spherical distribution..."

      But of course its not emitted in all directions. Its a very narrow beam coming out of the pole of a black hole.

    6. Re:Holy photons, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an "of course". It's an assumption that we make because explaining GRBs if they're highly directed is a lot easier than explaining them if they're spherically distributed.

      But it's not a given that they are what we think they are.

  22. Outrageous Bureaucratic Sloth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This GRB was 5 billion light years away. That means they had 5 billion years to prepare for this and take evasive measures. Yet they did not.

    Gee, maybe if they had 10 billion years to prepare, they might have found time to do something about it!

  23. Wonder if we'll see other effects. by meerling · · Score: 1

    Since it was an extraordinary x-ray discharge from a great distance with no other apparent discharges (radio, infrared, visible, etc), I have to wonder if continued observation will eventually yield those at a later time. If so, how would that be interpreted? (Not only regarding the cause/aftermath of the event itself, but also interference by interstellar materials and possible changes to em propagation.)

    I don't know much science, but I know enough to make science teachers nervous ;)

    1. Re:Wonder if we'll see other effects. by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plenty of extraordinarily distant GRBs have been observed already and no evidence has been found yet of variation of EM propagation speed across the spectrum over long distances.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  24. Just up your TTL... by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 1

    ...to 10 billion years. Problem solved.

  25. Glad it is just gamma rays by owlstead · · Score: 1

    Glad it is just gamma rays, if it were in infrared or even visible light, somebody would probably blame the burst for the global temperature rise.

  26. chicago cubs Affected they are staring to play goo by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    they are staring to play good base ball now.

  27. Search "Wormhole Sun LASCO" on Youtube. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You get this video about actual observations of intercelestial bodies manipulating the sun with what are termed lasers, and then there are passes from what is deemed "wormhole" technology that arrives near the sun from a trailable distance that could be seen as perhaps millions of lightyears away because it can be visually traced.

    Then of'course there is the meteor over 4-times larger than Planet Jupiter, and NASA doesn't report any of this.

    Yay homebrew and independent astronomers!

  28. That's funny... by bynary · · Score: 1

    Weirdly, it didn’t look out of the ordinary in visible light.

    I don't see how this is weird. The room didn't get any brighter when they bombarded my knee with x-rays when they were looking at my torn meniscus.

    --
    http://www.bynarystudio.com
  29. Youtube "Nibiru" after "Wormhole Sun LASCO" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, other along the equator have perspective to see the 2nd "dead" sun light-up as it rises above the Horizon with the local Solar Sun in this constelation. Can be seen from Sri Lanka, for example. The video of that can be seen here. Many more on Nibiru as this is what will be the flyby known as Planet-X that is expected by US Navy to discharge gravity and slow Earth rotation to displace over 500 thousand cubic miles of sea water to cover all the planet except Tibet (aka "Roof of the Heavens") and Colorado around Aspen.

    I posted another response about Wormhole technology seen used around the Sun, in this video. Look at that Meteor 4x larger than Jupiter at frame 2:29 that NASA never told anyone about. Wormhole appears millions of lightyears away and can see it's entire waypoint trail off in the distance and then emerge right next to the Solar sun at 2:49. Nothing from NASA... What do they get money for again, ahh, their recent movie Red Planet was a blockbuster but I don't think it's going to be anywhere as real as the government movies from China and India that will appear soon.

    1. Re:Youtube "Nibiru" after "Wormhole Sun LASCO" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bahahaha what a loon

      You can go to the nasa website for .. ah who am i kidding, no you wont.

  30. My Optics! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    My Optics! The goggles to nothing!

  31. a quantum wormhole generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stargated you

  32. A Funny by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

    Turns out it was caused by the Death Star.

  33. Captain Sunshine strikes again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's a$$ feels a little...warm, and incontinent. :-(

  34. LIGO by planckscale · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the burst was close enough to LIGO for it to pick up a Gravity Wave? That's the theory anyway that gravity waves should be measurable in association with GRBs... But waves in the ocean travel much slower than the wind that creates them, so maybe there's a lag between the event and the actual measured wave.

    --
    Namaste
  35. Engineering by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    I am kind of impressed that the programmers anticipated excessive gamma rays and instituted measures to prevent damage. Your standard-issue security and digital cameras don't do that.

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  36. Did i get it right? by drolli · · Score: 1

    Did i get it right? if i take the difference in distance into account naively, then the radioation itensity at the source was 10^12 times higher than the brightest source we see normally?

    octave:13> 100*(5e9/50e3)^2
    ans = 1.0000e+12

    glad i am far away!

  37. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colonized the galaxy and STILL no IPv6?!

  38. Oh no, Mc Mkay is at it again by youn · · Score: 1

    trying to build DMZs by blowing up star systems

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    1. Re:Oh no, Mc Mkay is at it again by youn · · Score: 1

      replying to myself, I'm still asleep... embarassing, I meant to say

      oh no, he's trying to build ZPMs by blowing up star systems :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  39. RTFS by mangu · · Score: 1

    Superman was looking at the sky during the GRB event and was blinded due to his X-ray vision

    If you had read the last line of TFS you would know that "Weirdly, it didn't look out of the ordinary in visible light" (incidentally, why they think it's weird that something that emits X-rays looks ordinary in visible light?)

    It was only Superman's X-ray vision that was blinded, his ordinary vision is still super. Now MacGyver has agreed to help by improvising a pair of X-ray eyeglasses using a dentist's X-ray machine, two rubber bands, an Etch-a-Sketch, and a discarded box of Cheerios.

  40. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... somebody simply fired up the next-gen Windows system over there.

    Not to worry, the bugs are ironed out by now... ...or are they?

    Cue in the maniac laughter.

  41. Coded messages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in Astronomy news, scientists working on the Alien Lifeform Contact and Environmental Evaluation project based in the Smeilstrom Cluster announced today that despite repeated efforts to make contact with alien life, they have so far failed utterly. Today, the scientist sent the last coded message in the hopes that they might receive a last-minute reply from some distant alien civilization, and began preparations to decommission the facility.

    "It's maddening", said Professor Kjalksbon, as he prepared the send the final Gamma Burst Encoded message. "We know that according to probability, there should be intelligent life nearly everywhere. Yet after several billion years of transmission, we have still received no reply! We had a highly promising Galaxy some 5 billion light years away, right next to the Goorks Penal Colony, but even though conditions seem perfect for intelligent life we've received nothing more promising than some insignificant irregularities in the radio spectrum."
    Further investigation revealed the irregularity was most likely caused when an attempted escape ended in a stolen comet breaking up and crashing into a gas giant orbiting a nearby star, a barren system devoid of any possibility of life.

    Some critics have postulated that alien civilizations might not notice, or be able to understand the messages, or even worse, be physically vulnerable to the emissions. When asked for a response to such criticisms, the Professor replied "Utter nonsense. How could any intelligent life form fail to notice such an unusual event?" He went on to state that "we know very well that an intelligent civilization would certainly be able to observe such events and have no trouble responding in a timely manner, it's very simple technology that any primitive society could produce, which is why we stuck with such a rudimentary transmission medium".
    When pressed on the possibility that the signals might actually be harming, or possibly even destroying other forms of life, thus preventing a reply, he scoffed "Riiiight. Well, I suppose it might have an adverse effect if life were based on some form of Carbon, but that's an utterly ridiculous idea." Our interview was cut short as the professor was called away on a final systems decommission check, and could be heard chuckling to himself "Carbon based life, who comes up with these questions?"

    So ends the search for other intelligent life in this sector of the Universe. With this environmental impact study completed, it paves the way for development of a new Frueqsbald park, which promoters estimate could produce enough additional revenue to pull them out of their recent economic collapse. The parent company plans on moving forward with the demolition project next Quantar, which will require a staggering 67 singularities in order to rid the region of excess mass. The company already has the dumping permits lined up to dispose of the singularities in the Aaaljervont region, a move which has not been without its own controversy.

    Back to you in the studio, Carl.