Slashdot Mirror


Ikaros Spacecraft Successfully Propelled In Space

An anonymous reader writes "Japan's IKAROS spacecraft has already successfully deployed the first solar sail in space, but today it made the only first that really matters: it successfully captured the sun's rays with its 3,000-square-foot sail and used the energy to speed its way through space. Each photon of light exerts 0.0002 pounds of pressure on the 3,000-square-foot sail, and the steady stream of solar exposure has succeeded in propelling the nearly 700-pound drone."

54 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Sad writing (and summary) by waives · · Score: 5, Insightful

    stupid writers reported the total force on the sail (1.12mN) = 0.0002 lbf as the per-photon pressure.

    1. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by RichMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone should ask the writers why they can stand outside on a summer's day and no be pounded into the pavement.

    2. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did some math and came up with something like 2.1E20 pounds of thrust. It would either far away or (more likely) shattered to pieces with that much thrust. Doing some other math, I come up with about 1.9E-28 pounds of thrust per photon. That seems more realistic to me.

      Based on total force of 1.12mN and assuming a static photon count, that looks like an acceleration of 4E-6 m/s^2, so each day it will pick up a velocity of about 0.3 m/s.

      Am I getting this correct?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2010/07/20100709_ikaros_e.html

      the actual press release from the people that *made* the thing. It has better math, as well as a couple fancy graphs. Perhaps this is what should have been posted to /. instead of a 3rd party report?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    4. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2

      Holy crap!! Thank you SO MUCH!!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Based on total force of 1.12mN and assuming a static photon count, that looks like an acceleration of 4E-6 m/s^2, so each day it will pick up a velocity of about 0.3 m/s.

      Yep. ( ((1.12 millinewton) / (700 pounds)) * (1 day) = 0.304767031 m / s )

    6. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

      No...thank the Holy Google. I am merely an Earthly conduit.

    7. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by neo8750 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps this is what should have been posted to /. instead of a 3rd party report?

      You must be new here...

    8. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This means they have a most precise frequency standard behind their doppler measurements.

    9. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by boxo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone should ask the writers why they can stand outside on a summer's day and no be pounded into the pavement.

      They are not pounded into the ground because reflected light from the pavement pounds back with an upward force.

    10. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by Zelaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The basic human need to be watched was once satisfied by God. Now, the same functionality can be replicated with data-mining algorithms.

    11. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by marqs · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would ask them, but I'm currently being pounded into the pavement. I have to wait until the sun sets...

    12. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by mbone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't that a very very small force though?

      This is a solar sail. They produce a very small thrust, and will never be used to get into orbit, but they require no fuel. If you want more thrust, build a bigger sail (i.e., raise the area to mass ratio). With a big enough sail (and some time) you could go anywhere in the inner solar system.

    13. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

      how is this thing going to slow down once it gets to where it wants to go?

      The same way sailboats go against the wind.

      Set the sail at an angle different from 90 degrees towards the sun. The resulting force can be divided in two components, one pointing outwards to the sun, which is cancelled by the sun's gravitation, and another component perpendicular to the first, which will increase or decrease the spacecraft's orbital velocity.
       

    14. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My point was that any deep-space explorers are going to need some patience...

      Remember that, unlike a rocket, this is a constant acceleration. They've got about 1E-4 N of force converting from the value in TFS (note to Americans: please use metric for anything involving science. Stuff goes badly wrong if you need to stuff your equations full of fudge factors). The press release appears to claim 1-1.2mN, which would be 1E-3 N, so someone possibly made a conversion error somewhere. The craft masses around 300Kg. f=ma, so a = f/m. At 1E-3N / 300Kg = 3.3E-6ms^-2. After a week, they're going at 2m/s. After two weeks, they're going at 4m/s, and so on.

      These numbers seem pretty low, considering that they're aiming to get to Jupiter in two years, but possibly they get a gravity boost of some kind.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by identity0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go ahead and joke all you want, I'm not coming out of the basement until it's proven that sunlight won't pound you into the pavement.

    16. Re:Sad writing (and summary) by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (note to Americans: please use metric for anything involving science. Stuff goes badly wrong if you need to stuff your equations full of fudge factors)

      It's worse than that. If you don't know what's the difference between a slug and a poundal, use metric. If you do, you already realize why you should use metric.

  2. Top Speed ? by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great, now they can see if it's acceleration is anywhere near what proponents and sci-fi writers have been saying for decades.
    Also, maneuverability, as I just don't see most of those sailing techniques working in a vacuum.
    Can't wait for final results :)

    1. Re:Top Speed ? by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, not really. Photons carry several orders of magnitude more momentum than solar wind. The only "practical" way to capture momentum from solar wind is with a magnetic sail, since the surface area required (hundreds of square km) would be unfeasible with any physical material.

    2. Re:Top Speed ? by DesertNomad · · Score: 5, Informative

      Barely distinguishable? Jupiter is only 5 times Earth's distance from the Sun. Outside Earth's atmosphere, solar insolation averages around 1370 watts per square meter. At Jupiter's orbital distance, it's about 50 watts per sq meter. That's a huge amount of power. At Jupiter's distance, the Sun is well over a million times brighter than Sirius, the brightest star in the Terran sky. Barely distinguishable? Bah.

    3. Re:Top Speed ? by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It appears to be operating well within expectations, looking at the linked website from the Japanese space administration, it's looking to be well within expectations.

      But even so, we're talking about a very, very small acceleration effect - if you were on board, you basically wouldn't notice it at all. It's what, 2/10,000 of a pound of thrust, with a 700 pound payload? Since it takes 1 pound of thrust acting on 1 pound of material to equal 1 G, the amount of accelleration on this is something like 2/(10,000 * 700) or 1/3,500,000 of 1 G.

      Unless I missed something basic, this satellite is going to be accelerating for a *long* time...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Top Speed ? by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just don't see most of those sailing techniques working in a vacuum.

      Nope, tried and true sailing techniques won't work in a vacuum. Neither do solar sails either, so thats not really relevant.

      Space is not a vacuum, its just not very dense.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Top Speed ? by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, maneuverability, as I just don't see most of those sailing techniques working in a vacuum.

      Solar sails don't, and have never been intended to, use "sailing techniques". In that sense "solar sail" is an unfortunate misnomer. Solar sail maneuvers typically take advantage of the fact that changing the sail orientation enable you to direct the resultant force from the solar radiation pressure either along or counter to the orbital velocity vector. Depending on which way you point the sail you either increase or decrease your orbit energy. Increases in orbit energy correspond to increases in orbit radius (or semi-major axis if in a non-circular orbit), while decreases in energy decrease the radius of the orbit. There's no "tacking" in the sense of ocean sailing.

    6. Re:Top Speed ? by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't adjust gravity vector.

      You cannot adjust the keel vector in a sailboat either, the force is always perpendicular to the direction you are moving. But that's not important, you only need to adjust one of the two vectors to get a resultant vector in any direction you need.

      The main difference between ocean sailing and solar sailing is the rudder. Considering it's used for small corrections to compensate for waves and currents, which do not exist in space, solar sailing can be done without it.

  3. Photon pressure wildly, ludicrously off by jonabbey · · Score: 4, Informative

    The figure of 0.0002 pounds of pressure per photon is off by a vast degree. The Wikipedia article on Solar Sails cites a figure of 4.57x106 N/m2, or .00000457 Newtons of force ( 0.000001027 pound-feet) against a square meter of sail material given the full flux of the Sun at Earth's orbit. A single photon would provide less than a trillionth of that amount.

    1. Re:Photon pressure wildly, ludicrously off by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 2, Informative

      They reported the total pressure on the sail as the pressure of one photon.

  4. Re:I wouldn't call it IKAROS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, it's going the wrong direction.

  5. Also. by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aside from the article being wrong about the forces exerted, I hate that last sentence.

    "...the steady stream of solar exposure has succeeded in propelling the nearly 700-pound drone."

    Well... how fast has it gotten to so far? That's what it sounds like the sentence is going to say, and then it just ends. It bothers me.
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:Also. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just the fact that it has been propelled, at all, is the achievement. It doesn't matter how fast or how far. Kinda like the satellite... didn't really matter that it just beeped. The achievement was that it was up there.

  6. Use scientific units... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Use SI-units for crying out loud. This is a scientific context. Not a grocery list. Also so the rest of the 90% of the world population can understand it.

    1. Re: Use scientific units... by MollyB · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Japan's IKAROS spacecraft has already successfully deployed the first solar sail in space, but today it made the only first that really matters: it successfully captured the sun's rays with its 278.709 square meter-sail and used the energy to speed its way through space. Each photon of light exerts 0.090718474 grams of pressure on the 278.709 square meter-sail, and the steady stream of solar exposure has succeeded in propelling the nearly 317.514659 kilogram-drone."

      Better?

    2. Re: Use scientific units... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or you can get the more precise values from the original at http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/ikaros/index_e.html
      JAXA uses metric units. The conversion to American units in the article is rounded.

      Another fun fact about imperial units that you are probably not aware of, almost all contries have them, just that they differ. The rest of the world changed to metric units partly to get rid of the problem that the length of an inch were different depending on what country you were in.

    3. Re: Use scientific units... by JoeRobe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most people don't know what a N/m^2 is, sure, but a N/m^2 also has the name Pascal (Pa), which a lot of people do know. Even U.S. high schools are pushing students to use Pa for pressure units instead of atmospheres or Torr or the dreaded inches of Hg. In any case, grams times the standard "g" constant still isn't pressure, it's force, and gram is never an SI unit of pressure or force, nor is gram times g.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    4. Re: Use scientific units... by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, no. Pressure isn't measured in gram

      [...]

      Pressure is measured in Newton per square meter.
       

      This is almost tragic. So much discussion of the correct unit for pressure, yet nobody seems to realize that the "pressure" described in the article is not a pressure. It is the total force acting on the sail.

      So the correct unit is neither pounds, gram nor N/m. It is N.

  7. Use scientific units... by Co0Ps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Use SI-units for crying out loud. This is a scientific context. Not a grocery list. Also so the rest of the 90% of the world population can understand it..

  8. Epic unit fail by johndoe42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Each photon of light exerts 0.0002 pounds of pressure on the 3,000-square-foot sail

    C'mon people, can't you even check if what you're saying makes the slightest sense before posting it? There are two impressive errors in that sentence. First, each photon [1] applies some impulse to the sail. Impulse is what you feel pushing you back when someone punches you. It's a one-time effect and is neither a force (impulse per unit time) nor a pressure. Second, a pound might be a unit of force or of mass, depending who you ask, what you're talking about, and how pedantic you are, but it is never a unit of pressure. (If it were, you might say that the Earth's atmosphere weights 14 pounds, a statement that makes no sense at all.)

    [1] For the physically inclined, there's a more subtle error, too. The impulse supplied by a photon is related to its momentum, which is a function of wavelength. So, unless something weird's happening in the sail, blue photons supply a larger impulse than red photons.

  9. Re:I wouldn't call it IKAROS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not necessarily:

    "The craft will spend six months traveling to Venus, and then it will begin a three-year journey to the far side of the Sun." from wikipedia

    and

    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Solar_sail#H-reversal_sun_flyby_trajectory

  10. Wow! by Zevensoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Each photon of light exerts 0.0002 pounds of pressure" I was knocked over when I read that!

  11. Sigh. by robbak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all part of the 'Knots per hour' and 'Watts per day' malaise that all journalists are infected with.

    None of them* can use units correctly, leaving us to try to interpret what the scientist, who wrote the notes that were mismassaged into a press release which was misinterpreted by the journalist, was trying to say.

    *unjustified absolute. YHBT

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:Sigh. by Timmmm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're not a journalist are you?

      For *your* benefit, Watts per hour is NOT a unit of power or energy. Let me illustrate by analogy with speeds:

      Watt: power
      Watt-hour: energy (I.e. energy transfered in one our at one Watt)

      Knot: speed
      Knot-hour: distance (I.e. distance travelled in one our at one knot)

      Watts per hour is as nonsensical as knots per hour or MPH per hour....

      Don't worry, hardly anyone gets this right.

  12. Further idiotic errors by jonabbey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Point the first: 1^1020 = 1.

    Point the second: 1/1 = 1, which is greater than a trillionth.

    Point the third: The cited article calculates 2.55453 X 10^20, and a trillion is 10^12, so the trillionth guess was only off by 8 orders of magnitude, not 1,020 orders, as I thought when I wrote that.

    Point the main: I should not try to show off my math on the Internet.

  13. Pound of pressure? by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I checked a pound was not a unit of pressure. On that note, I wish pounds weren't used to measure anything.

    1. Re:Pound of pressure? by NEDHead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Euros are soooooo much more useful

  14. Its a good start by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A 3000 square foot sail is about 16 metres across. Imagine what you could do with a sail one kilometre across. To get to Titan: kill your orbit around the sun with your sail. Gravitational slingshot off the sun with a single burn, possibly combining the sail with a solar thermal rocket, then aero-brake in the atmosphere of Saturn, then repeat at Titan. How's that for a fast trip?

    1. Re:Its a good start by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is that bleeding off energy with a solar sail isn't like just jumping onto a sunward elliptical orbit. You're likely to spiral in towards the sun, rather than zip around it. More importantly, a "slingshot" takes advantage of planetary motion relative to the sun to achieve a large trajectory change: a "slingshot" around the sun won't do anything except get you onto the outbound leg of the trajectory you're already on (i.e. it won't help you get further out from the sun than you were already going anyway). You'd probably be better off conserving the energy you already have, and using the sail to spiral out into a higher orbit.

  15. Troglodyte? Who? Me? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Each photon of light exerts 0.0002 pounds of pressure

    That's why I stay indoors.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  16. Re:Google thinks it can hit light speed in 7 years by grantek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's an interesting example of relativity though, because you're using the speed of light to try to accelerate you to the speed of light - once you understand that the speed of light is always constant, you arrive at the fact that the faster you're going, the less energy the light has. The light "shifts" to the red side of the spectrum.

  17. Re:Google thinks it can hit light speed in 7 years by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, TFS said [...]

    We've begun implementing Microsoft's latest "developer stack" at work. Now every time someone refers to "TFS", I think "what, Slashdot is on Team Foundation Server too?" Great. Thanks Microsoft.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  18. Sunjammer by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once upon a time (about 1962) Arthur C. Clarke wrote a story called Sunjammer. I was fortunate enough to read it in its original publication. I hunted for it for years afterwards to read again, but he had changed the name because it duplicated the name of another unrelated SF story that year. Imaginary points to anyone who can name:

    1: The original magazine of publication.
    2: The new story name.

    I've been in love with the idea of solar sailing, and in fear of the sun's stormy season, ever since.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Sunjammer by calidoscope · · Score: 2, Informative
      1. Boy's Life.

      2. Wind from the Sun.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  19. Ok, we get it by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok folks, we get it -- almost every single comment so far has been about the unit error in the article. You noticed how silly it is, and are therefore smart. Can we get past that now and talk about how ridiculously awesome it is that the first-ever solar sail has been successful, and is propelling through the inner solar system by riding photons from the Sun?

    1. Re:Ok, we get it by Cesa · · Score: 4, Funny

      We'll just save that for the dupe.

  20. Re:Venus is closer to the Sun then Earth by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It might not be able to tack, but it can do something like reaching. It's been a decade since I played with the maths for this, so I'm going to be handwaving and relying on my memory for most of this post - someone doing some actual calculation, please feel free to correct me...

    There are two forces acting on the craft. One is the force from the sail, the other is from the Sun's gravity. Actually, this is a massive oversimplification, it's really an n-body problem, and at the moment the Earth and Moon's gravity will also be significant factors.

    The important thing to remember, however, is that it already has a considerable orbital velocity. It is not going to fall into the Sun, it is going to continue in the Earth's orbit unless some extra force acts on it. By angling the sail away from the Sun, it can make its orbit more eccentric, meaning that perihelion will be closer. As it falls into this eccentric orbit, it will gain velocity. It can then swing around Venus and head out, at which point it will be running (solar wind directly behind it).

    Sailing metaphors are actually not very helpful, because inertia doesn't matter much when sailing (except when you come about), but it is incredibly important in orbital mechanics.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News