Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Says eFuse Doesn't Permanently Brick Phones

radicalpi writes "Motorola has responded to claims that eFuse is designed to brick your device if you attempt to mod it or install unauthorized bootloaders. Yes, the device will still not operate with unauthorized software, but it will only go into recovery mode until you reinstall the authorized software. According to Motorola: 'If a device attempts to boot with unapproved software, it will go into recovery mode, and can re-boot once approved software is re-installed.'"

294 comments

  1. Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead? by noidentity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Motorola Says eFuse Doesn't Brick Phones

    There, fixed that for you. Bricked is permanent. Non-permanent "bricking" isn't bricking at all. If you can revive it, it was never bricked in the first place.

  2. Memo to IT dept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QUICK push out a update to update the software that will do this. "If a device attempts to boot with unapproved software, it will go into recovery mode, and can re-boot once approved software is re-installed"

  3. Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but I will decide what software is "authorized" to run on my phone!

    No sale for you.

    1. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Couldn't this be some sort of unfair business practices? I mean, if Microsoft made it so that only Microsoft approved programs could run on windows, they would be sued in a heart beat, what makes this different?

    2. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet apple does it every day.

    3. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't this be some sort of unfair business practices? I mean, if Microsoft made it so that only Microsoft approved programs could run on windows, they would be sued in a heart beat, what makes this different?

      This is exactly what Apple is doing with the iPhone. Not approved by apple? Nope, can't install it.

    4. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Revotron · · Score: 1

      Unfair business practices != illegal. Frowned upon, yes. Illegal, not exactly.

      Additionally, Microsoft controls a significant portion of the desktop market. Anti-monopoly legislation comes into play there. Motorola (specifically the Droid X) is far, far, far from a monopoly.

    5. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      Yet Google is far from a monopoly yet they are being investigated in Europe for unfair business practices. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/opinion/15thu3.html?_r=3

    6. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Revotron · · Score: 1

      Google may not be a traditional monopoly, but you have to admit they are a *major* player in the industry.

      I can see where an investigation is justified. I have no doubt that Google has the power to shut someone out and royally screw up smaller operations.

    7. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They haven't succeeded in selling me a phone either, though I would welcome the change.

    8. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 0

      But Motorolla is a major player too, with 17% that is nothing to laugh at. http://www.answers.com/topic/motorola-inc

    9. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Revotron · · Score: 1

      This is true, but I still fail to see how it's unfair enough of an action on Motorola's part that it warrants government intervention and investigation.

      Nobody's forcing you to get or use a Droid X.

    10. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And nobody forces you to use Windows - you can use Linux or Apple with emulators for all PC software you need.
      And nobody forces you to use Google - yahoo, bing, askjeeves lol.
      The biggest reason I think that there is reason for investigation is that you become locked into a contract if you so choose to use a motorola phone.

    11. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Revotron · · Score: 1

      Locked into contract, yes. Locked into phone, no.

      You're free to change phones whenever you like - the only difference is you'll pay full, non-subsidized price for the new device. That's entirely a business decision.

      The reason Microsoft was targeted for monopolistic activity is because of their pervasiveness in everyday computing. When 90% of the computers out there run Windows (horrible exaggeration, I know) your business would be absolutely destroyed if Microsoft somehow stopped your application from running on Windows computers, *or* if they forced people to use their app over yours.

      Motorola's 17% of the market is measly compared to what Microsoft had. Additionally, that's *all* Motorola phones, not just the Droid X. The Droid X is a fraction of a fraction of a percent, therefore it's essentially a waste of the government's time to slap Motorola on the wrist for inconveniencing so few customers.

      As an aside, I find it hilarious that we complain about rampant government spending, but at the same time demand investigations into highly-specific, low-impact matters such as these.

    12. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something people seem to forget is that MS would have been fine as a monopoly if they just hadn't used their status to force vendors to do things they otherwise wouldn't have done (pay for licenses for systems sold without any MS software, actively prevent vendors from selling other software, etc). Being a monopoly isn't illegal. Using that status to accomplish other things (remaining a monopoly for example) is.

      When you get locked into a 2 year contract it isn't with a motorola phone, it is with a carrier, and all that I'm aware of carry phones by many other carriers. Many of them being android phones, even. I don't see how there is any case against motorola (yet). I think it would take an awful lot more, too.

    13. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by kainosnous · · Score: 1

      The problem is that too many people see suing as the only option. It is far more efficient to boycott or find other free market solutions to encourage them to be more user friendly. The fact that people look to the courts shows the sad state of things.

      Companies, particularly large ones, have more money than you do, and so they are likely to do better in court. Then, if you do manage a small victory, it will hurt future vendors, and therefore harm competition. We should use the market against them. Their power comes from your cash.

      I'm surprised that with so many potentially capable parties in the tech community and here on /. that we don't have any phones yet that are more functional. All that I can figure is that the majority of people really are happy with these contracts and defective by design phones.

      --
      There are 10 commandments: 01)Thou shalt love the Lord Thy God 10)Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.Matt22:34-40
    14. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      And nobody forces you to use Windows

      Actually, uhm.. yes they do. My employer does for one.

    15. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go even further and say that most of the marketplace does. If you don't run Windows and you are a technical worker of some kind, whether you work for a corporation or for yourself, then chances are you are going to starve to death.

    16. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by daveime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How naive can you be ?

      Suing IS the only option. Any individual consumer boycotting a product will do nothing, because they don't care about individual users ... this is why they're quite happy to deal with your "customer service" requests by letting you talk so someone in Mumbai reading from a checklist of approved questions but offering no real answers.

      Any percentage less than a certain amount are also "don't care" metrics, it simply won't make a dent on their overall sales, and is not cost effective enough to affect a recall or revision to the product.

      But a court case, together with it's bad publicity and public perception that the company isn't being totally honest, WILL have the CEOs taking notice, and might just change something to the benefit of all users.

      You are one of nearly seven billion people on the planet ... no one cares what you boycott or otherwise, no one will even know about it. Make a class action suit, and entire countries can hear about it on the six o'clock news.

    17. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      WTF? I don't know what world you live in, but many, many devices do not run software you want it to run. It doesn't make it illegal. Can you dictate what software comes with your microwave, car, etc? You can sometimes change the software but you, at the least, void any and all warranties. Sometimes you might even damage the device. If this is not your preference, I suggest you do not buy the device; however, I think you will find that many devices do not meet your criteria.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Will they be sued when Windows Phone 7 comes out? I don't think so, but predict their market share will fall to approximately zero and most of their remaining customers will jump ship to Android.

    19. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Depends under what law, in the US no, it's not illegal. Antitrust is the term used for it in the EU courts, Microsoft have been in such a case for years. And google is under investigation. Someone should go after apple too though.

    20. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw this I thought,

      Slash will decide? The guitarist? Half of Slashdot?

      Then I realized that I and / look an awful lot alike.

    21. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      yahoo, bing, ask... are all perfectly compatible alternatives. They all do pretty much the same thing and it's legal to choose between them. If I want to open this .wmv file, legally I can not on linux, god forbid if someone stuck M$ DRM on it too.

    22. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Technically, as your employer uses that computer, it's your employers choice what runs on it. But computers you own yourself are technically your choice.

    23. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by kainosnous · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that in your post, the actions which you say will make them take notice boil down to free market capitalism fueled by a court case. You mention "bad publicity" and the six o'clock news. I see your point that the courts are a great way to raise awareness. My point is that it is a sad thing that we can't find a better way to get people's attention.

      Obviously, they don't care about customer service because we don't care. Maybe I'm too skeptical, but I don't think that this court case will change anything. In the end, a few /. readers get upset enough while most of the world never hears of it. It's just my opinion, but time will tell.

      --
      There are 10 commandments: 01)Thou shalt love the Lord Thy God 10)Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.Matt22:34-40
    24. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by selven · · Score: 1

      Motorola doesn't have much of a monopoly to leverage.

    25. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by gilesjuk · · Score: 0

      Wrong. You can jailbreak an iPhone. If you did the same on the Droid X it would refuse to boot. That is the difference!

    26. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Antitrust is the term used for it in the EU courts

      Actually no, "antitrust" is from the US. The Sherman Act was called "The Anti-trust act", in 1890, way before the EU was even a thought.
      The original text is:

      "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal."

      Hence "anti-trust".

    27. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't consider a 2/3 world-wide share to be "far" from a monopoly. Aside from Microsoft, who else do you know that has such numbers? Maybe some LCD panel manufacturers or chip makers, but they aren't retailers and are much more niche.

    28. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the microwave is not designed to become unusable by installing alternate software onto it. The software you install might do so but the original software will let you.

    29. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      If you have two mini-marts across the street from each other, and they both meet to discuss how they are going to charge $4 for a gallon of milk, if you find out and report them to the DoJ, they will get in trouble, regardless of if they are a monopoly or even if their collusive act would have any effect on the market.

    30. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by daveime · · Score: 1

      My point is that it is a sad thing that we can't find a better way to get people's attention.

      Oh, I agree with you, but unfortunately there isn't.

      Consumer advocates and reviewers are most often biased and often financed to give positive / negative reviews and advice "sanctioned" by their controlling bodies. There's no-one I'd really say I could trust to give an honest opinion of some product.

      Personal boycotting of products has no impact whatsoever because of the sheer volume of sales, any more than protest voting for a minority political party has any impact on the outcome between the two major parties.

      A court case is the only way to get the medias' attention off Big Brother and Search for a Star long enough to actually raise public awareness over a large enough group to matter to the beancounters.

      Capitalism DOES work, unfortunately that's not the same as working "for the people".

    31. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A lot of (all?) newer iPhones can't be jailbroken.

    32. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by westlake · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      but I will decide what software is "authorized" to run on my phone!


      That would depend on what your software is intended to do. The cell phone service - the cell phone network - is not your private playground.

    33. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      What if Apple made it so that only Apple approved programs could run on iPhones. Should they be sued in a heart beat?

    34. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If you screw up the installation of any software, the device could become unusable. I once accidentally flashed the wrong BIOS update to my motherboard. Goodbye motherboard. Now I tried replacing the BIOS chip (they were removable back then) but it was dead. Again, if the conditions of the Motorola eFuse are not acceptable, buy another device. It is not illegal for them to install measures for prevent the installation of other firmware. Some people might consider this tamper protection. Some people might consider this inflexibility. It's a matter of perspective.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    35. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      What you are referring to is called "collusion". Monopoly means something specific and it has a specific legal test. The parent is right in saying stating Motorola does not have a monopoly as it does not control of the market.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    36. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of today (17 july 2010), iPhone 3GS models for people who didn't save their SHSH blobs to Cydia, and all iPhone 4 owners have no jailbreak.

      One guy (Geohot) quit the modding scene due to everyone begging for a JB.

      Oh, don't ask for an unlock. I checked eBay to see if anyone in the UK is selling them, and the iPhone 4 category is BRIMMING with scammers offering unlocked phones, then when you read the listing, the phone is from the US, or they say it is "unlock capable".

    37. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Debian+Cabbit · · Score: 1

      Microsoft DOES do it, just not with Windows, but with the Xbox 360. When a JTAG exploit was found by free60, Microsoft fixed it just before they released the exploit to run homebrew and unsigned code. The fix? Use a new bootloader and blow a fuse on the CPU dye that was part of the old bootloader, nullifying the exploit. Unfair and shady? Given the possibility of a real brick if the dashboard update failed, you betcha. Illegal? Not so far as I've seen.

    38. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that if you have a SMB, you have to run Microsoft Exchange in order for your salespeople to get the meetings, appointments, tasks, and other stuff that flies through secure connectors between corporate Exchange connectors.

      Yes, some places don't run Exchange, but they are usually either big companies (IBM, Google), or they are skirting on breaking the law by using "cloud" services that might have little to no guarantee of secure data retention.

      With Exchange comes Active Directory. And with AD comes everything else, because who in their right mind would want to have two places where users have to update passwords.

      Of course, what is shocking is that because there is no such thing as a UNIX workstation anymore, essentially you will use an x86 box or nothing.

      Want to get free of Microsoft? Find an honest to goodness Exchange replacement that can push mail to the PHB's iPhone, remotely wipe the ex-manager's WM device, set up secure connectors with the client's Exchange server for end to end encrypted communications, work with POP3/IMAP/MAPI/SMTP, and have a usable Web interface (stinking turds like Zimbra are great to have for home E-mail, but they are unusable for the enterprise). Oh, and Notes doesn't count, because nobody supports the platform.

    39. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few people can make a difference, especially when they are knowledgeable. If you know about technology, people come to you for your opinion. Intel, AMD, nVidia all try to cater to this market, not just to make money off of their purchases (which are many), but because this can be an influential segment. Not all companies care about this but the ones who don't are making a big mistake. Windows Vista was panned by the tech savvy so it flopped. The IPhone was popular not just because it appealed to the masses but because it appealed to this group as well.

      The problem isn't that individual users cannot make a difference, it is just that the people who know enough to care about this generally don't mind. I know many software engineers who have purchased the IPhone or would like too that don't care about how locked down it is. We just need this group to wake up, even though they are a small minority, that is all it would take.

    40. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like only Apple-approved programs can run on iPhone OS?

    41. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      I know its not a monopoly, and I know what collusion is if you read my post, I was merely pointing out that something can have no effect on the greater market and still be punishable.

    42. Re:Thanks for the clarification Motorola, by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for this news... Motorola congrats you just lost another sale. Who's to blame for this? It sounds like shit Verizon would pull but I wouldn't put it past Motorola to do this too. The same company that sold me a razor phone with mini USB port that only worked with their chargers.

      I'm So sick of being treated like a theif or criminal by my consumer electronics.

  4. Really now... by TheGreatHegemon · · Score: 1

    Does this make it any better? It's still taking a great deal of power away from the user.
    I wonder if this was brought on by the likes of Cyanogen bringing Froyo to the G1 (Hence extending it's life span greatly)?

  5. Huh? by Gazoogleheimer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and yet, nobody has ended up properly explaining what eFuse is. In fact, from reading this and other articles, some low-level fuse, like fuses in microcontrollers, doesn't seem to apply to the functionality they describe. This sounds much more complex and much higher-level...so what exactly is everyone going on about? Wikipedia says "In computing, eFUSE is a technology invented by IBM which allows for the dynamic real-time reprogramming of computer chips. Speaking abstractly, computer logic is generally 'etched' or 'hard-coded' onto a chip and cannot be changed after the chip has finished being manufactured. By utilizing an eFUSE (or more realistically, a number of individual eFUSEs), a chip manufacturer can allow for the circuits on a chip to change while it is in operation. The primary application of this technology is to provide in-chip performance tuning. If certain sub-systems fail, or are taking too long to respond, or are consuming too much power, the chip can instantly change its behavior by 'blowing' an eFUSE." What does that have to do with authorized software? Why would they use such a system rather than the other systems that have been used in the past? How is this different than some sort of half-FPGA ASIC? Anyways...

    1. Re:Huh? by assassinator42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it works like it does on the Xbox 360, signed system images will check how many eFuses have been blown and refuse to boot if it's more than what it's expecting. During an update, an eFuse will blown to prevent downgrading to a previous system image that may have some sort of vulnerability. "Vulnerability" in this case likely meaning something that lets you get root access.
      The eFuses are in the CPU so it's not like you can just bridge something with a wire.
      NOTE: I'm not entirely sure of the specifics with the 360, I think it may be more complicated than simply the number of eFused blown.

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The idea is that cryptographic signatures are stored inside the chip, namely CPU in all cases I know of, so that it only runs properly signed code. Blowing efuses will change the accepted signature to something new, thus setting back the goal of people who've just broken the system.

      Microsoft do it with the 360, which keeps unsigned code at bay with each update. It also causes issues with legitimate machines, seeing as one resistor that was faulty caused a huge swathe of console not booting after an update - they had the newly signed dashboard executables, but their efuses weren't blown accordingly.

      Expect mobiles to go the way of the 360, but future consoles to step up a few notches. The PS3 is surely the model to be built on - a piece of hardware, one of the Cell SPEs, that is executing completely isolated code that verifies system secrets like game and movie DRM keys. The cracking that made Sony remove OtherOS couldn't touch that SPE, but Sony didn't want to risk the integrity of their DRM - who knows what could have happened next (including Sony, I posit).

      IBM et al surely have some truly evil ideas they've thought up since these consoles were released, and there are still a few years to go for the next round... just watch as everybody laps it up, none the wiser, seeing as it's embedded in hardware they simply can't see and DRM simply isn't in the public consciousness.

    3. Re:Huh? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      This makes sense.

      Dedicate one chip to validating the boot code, if it detects monkey business blows the "eFUSE" that shuts off power to the other processors.

      I wonder if this can be bypassed with a simple short?

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:Huh? by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

      An efuse can sometimes be cleared by drilling a hole through the chip casing and exposing it to uv. Needless to say, this isn't something a home user can do. It takes a chip analysis lab.

      Any competent effuse based system blows the fuse inside a critical chip, rather than in a separate authentication chip, so no. You probably can't just short out a couple of pins.

    5. Re:Huh? by HonIsCool · · Score: 1

      An efuse is a physical alteration of the circuit. An FPGA uses SRAM or flashrom to hold the logic. Coming from PS3, I don't know anything about this Motorola phone, but I do know that people throw around the magical "efuse" whenever something happens that they don't understand. Example: "Sony prevented downgrades with firmware 2.10" -"OMG, they've blown an EFUSE!!" From reading the brief of the previous story, this seems very much like one of those instances...

      --
      "Give me six lines of C++ code written by the most competent programmer, and I will find enough in there to hang him."
    6. Re:Huh? by HonIsCool · · Score: 1

      eFuses are not affected by UV light; perhaps you're thinking of EPROM, a completely different technology?

      --
      "Give me six lines of C++ code written by the most competent programmer, and I will find enough in there to hang him."
    7. Re:Huh? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      eFuse : An electronic device used to screw the customer (public) and take away their rights. Also see Apple/consoles/HDMI etc.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    8. Re:Huh? by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 1

      not sure about "eFUSE" specifically, but the fuses on chips are used to write permanent data to a chip after manufacturing, typically during testing. If this is being done in the field and is un-doable, then it is most likely some non-volatile memory that they are calling "eFUSE". I'd bet that the firmware makes it look like a fuse except under certain circumstances.

      Actual fuses in chips are thin pieces of metal wire that connect to the power supply voltage. When you try to read the voltage, that connection gives you a logic "1". To blow the fuse, you use a higher power supply than you would normally use and run enough current through the thin wire so that it melts and breaks the connection. Then, when you try to read back that bit it will read a logic "0" for ever. This is very handy for encryption, calibration data, and manufacturing information such as lot# and chip location. Many years back, IIRC, Intel tried to put serial numbers on their CPUs that could be read back by the software. They backed off after some public outcry. This used the fuses described above.

  6. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Motorola Says eFuse Doesn't Brick Phones

    There, fixed that for you. Bricked is permanent. Non-permanent "bricking" isn't bricking at all. If you can revive it, it was never bricked in the first place.

    It all depends on how easy it is to reinstall the software. MOST "bricked" devices could be recovered at a service center with specialised equipment for a fee (that may not make it a cost effective proposition). If an end user can make the phone unusable but can't reverse the situation using the same equipment (or at least readily available affordable - as in a few bucks - equipment) I would still call it bricked even if it can be revived.

    I have no idea if in this safe mode it's easy to install the authorised software. If it is easy I wouldn't call that bricked either. I'd just call it nasty DRM that I'll steer well clear of.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  7. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bricking, just taking another step along the road to becoming an iPhone. Custom OS? We'll have none of that, thank you very much. Next up is stricter restrictions on what applications can run (enforced by your 'authorized-only' OS).

  8. Motorola really needs to by gcnaddict · · Score: 4, Insightful

    offer a free opt-out for those willing to take the risk. I'm not sure if the capability is even there, but if the owner is willing to sign a waiver releasing Motorola from any damages in the event that anything goes wrong (a la Malware), Motorola should do it.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Motorola really needs to by Timmmm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is basically what the nexus one does. You can unlock it, but it voids your warranty, and adds an unlocked padlock icon to the boot screen to show that you have unlocked it.

  9. Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I am waiting for hackers to identify the offending chip(s) then have them incapacitated. Afterwards, we can mod the beast.

    Or is it that I just do not understand the issues here? Does my suggestion even make sense?

    1. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The chips are identified, already.

      I've already been working on POC code to exploit that eFuse and make it so once activated you CAN'T possibly install anything on the phone any longer. Once it works, Motorola is going to suffer, hard.

      Ahh, the joys of exploiting semiconductors for various purposes. Some grow plants, others can be used to annoy someone, and even more can be used to force unfair business practices.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you make it play that stupid old hamster dance wav file at the same time? that'd be pretty nifty

    3. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Once POC works? No, because then the phone is truly bricked, nothing will work, at all, except the power button.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      Was just considering this. Have you open sourced what you have?

    5. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by westlake · · Score: 1

      I've already been working on POC code to exploit that eFuse and make it so once activated you CAN'T possibly install anything on the phone any longer. Once it works, Motorola is going to suffer, hard.

      But perhaps not as much as you:

      "I've cut my lighting power by 70%. I design energy-efficient hydroponics systems. I'm working on low-energy solutions that make it possible for man to live in space." Re:Among all the "skeptics*" out there

      Posts to a forum like Slashdot eventually expose more than enough of the truth about yourself to begin a serious inquiry.

      Nicknames can point the way. Language can point the way.

    6. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, that just gives Motorola a jump start to fixing the problem instead of giving us the advantage to force them to stop this bullshit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      Motorola can't touch me.

      I know a very dirty little secret, having once worked for them.

      I expose that and their entire business DES.

      It's *REALLY* nice being able to push almost any company around that I choose. Electronic Arts, Sony, Motorola. I own them. Blackmail is a wonderful thing.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, well, I can't say I agree with that- I've open sourced the work I've done on Apple's OSX updater, various crypto toolkits, etc, and have never seen anybody do anything about it until I've either contacted them directly or released it into the wild- but, it's your code so you're the boss.

      Anyways, if you'd like to collaborate drop me an email- my username@gmail.com.

    9. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chips are identified, already.

      I've already been working on POC code to exploit that eFuse and make it so once activated you CAN'T possibly install anything on the phone any longer. Once it works, Motorola is going to suffer, hard.

      Ahh, the joys of exploiting semiconductors for various purposes. Some grow plants, others can be used to annoy someone, and even more can be used to force unfair business practices.

      The mere fact that you refer to the _various_ secure boot mechanisms as "that eFuse" shows you have no idea what you are talking about. And you put it well, the operative phrase here is "once it works". Good luck with that.

    10. Re:Let hackers identify the offending chip(s)... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's also my stock options so Motorola can SMD either way. I'll initiate a shareholder's suit against them if they continue to piss me off. I may not hold a majority share but one of my good friend that originally got me a job at Motorola does!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  10. So... by alters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...it's about as locked as the iPhone then, and still requires jailbreaking?

    Go go open sou....waitaminnit...

    1. Re:So... by JuniorJack · · Score: 1

      Yep, Nokia runs on TrustZone few years already, but everyone screams - Nokia open, Apple bad. I guess for some people open means to be allowed running scripts, for others is be able to talk to the MMU in assembler. I think the whole Android open phone, was too good to be true

    2. Re:So... by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Much more locked than an iPhone in fact.

  11. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Inner_Child · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not bricking, just taking another step along the road to becoming an iPhone. Custom OS? We'll have none of that, thank you very much. Next up is stricter restrictions on what applications can run (enforced by your 'authorized-only' OS).

    Well on its way to becoming a reality with AT&T blocking side-loading apps. If it's not in the Market, too bad.

    --
    Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  12. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

    Thank you!

    --
    Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
  13. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

    This sounds exactly like it is on the CLIQ. In the past, if you were not careful with modding, you will end up with the phone bootlooping until you put the phone in USB recovery mode, and flash a signed SHX file. Now, you can most likely use nandroid and pull back to the last backup.

    This bit people big time when a new radio ROM was available for upgrading, and people upgraded to it with a rooted/custom ROM, one had to reflash (losing root). Of course new ROM fixed the RAMDLD exploit that was used to root the phone in the first place.

    Luckily, on the CLIQ, there was a ROM that had ro.secure set to 0 that was signed by a vendor. This allowed for a recovery image to be flashed, and new ROMS pushed to the phone. Had this not been the case, I'm sure it would have been an uphill battle to get the phone re-rooted, and likely people would have moved on to other platforms and not bothered.

    All and all, this isn't great news, but it is better than having devices be rendered unusable until sent to a Motorola repair depot.

  14. Motorola by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Haven't they... like sucked since 1999?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Motorola by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Original Droid is pretty nice. I love mine anyway. Of course part of that is the ease at hacking it to run custom ROMs, so I'll stay away from the Droid X until that flaw is solved.

  15. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by adolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. Bricked is forever, as defined by perception and ability -- both of which are subject to change.

    A few years ago, I really fucked up a WRT54G when playing with software. I was going to throw it away, when I stumbled across a process for programming it using its JTAG interface and a parallel port. (Which worked fine.)

    So was it a brick? The answer is simple, but flexible: It was a brick until I learned that it was possible for me to recover it, at which point it ceased to be a brick.

    And now that I know how to deal with these issues, I can't successfully brick a WRT54G in the same fashion.

    A dozen years ago, I fucked up a PC by flashing the wrong BIOS. Was it a brick? Again, it's a matter of perspective. In this particular case it was not a brick, though most folks would have reasonably considered it to be completely and totally bricked. Why was it not bricked for me? Because I already knew how to fix it: Enable shadow ROM on another computer, and plug the improperly-flashed BIOS into it hot. Then, just re-flash with the correct image, put the hardware back where it was, and move on with life.

  16. DDoS Possible? by psycho12345 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't this be asking for a DDoS? Couldn't one purposely put an app up that went about and blew every single one of these "eFuses", thus forcing a reset of the phone? Sounds like a easy path to take out phones and play some havoc. Not to mention if somehow an app accidentally tripped one too many of these. Hell I could see a scam going that nuked phones this way, then offered to "repair" them, for some extortionate fee.

  17. OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Nitewing98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this was the iPhone they were talking about, there would be front page stories in all the major newspapers and websites saying what a crappy company Apple is for locking down their device. Kind of funny when the shoe's on the other foot, isn't it? As Jobs pointed out today, the iPhone 4 has only been out 22 days and the news media was having a conniption making the antenna issue "major news." (hint: "Major news" is the war in Afghanistan and the Gulf of Mexico mess). In fact, since the whole point of Android was to be open-source (as opposed to Apple's "Death grip" on developers), it's kind of funny that Motorola feels also that there are limits to what you should be able to do with your phone.

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

    1. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is sad, that's for sure, but at the same time it's unfair to blame Android for this debacle. Android is the OS, and it's not Google's fault that Motorola is so blatantly circumventing the spirit of the OS. Apple, on the other hand, controls the entire system, hardware and software. Thus, anything you don't like about the iPhone can be squarely blamed on them.

      Personally, I just hope the rest of the industry doesn't think Motorola has had a bright idea here, and try to follow suit. I also can't see myself getting any of the Motorola phones in the future... I love my Droid, but damned if I'm going to support a company that's pulling stunts like this.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by robmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you get hours and hours, lot off news pages of free advertisement before lunch, and you as a company has a culture of overhyping and nurture others desire to hype your product, do not cry when the contrary happens: exaggerated or great emphasis on your mistakes or what you do not delivered

    3. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Spad · · Score: 1

      To be fair, if you want an Android phone you don't have to get on from Motorola, you've got a huge amount of choice, but if you want an iPhone, you've only got one choice; buy from Apple.

    4. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by randomsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right - the iPhone would get more press and more criticism for this.

      This is because Apple are so good at marketing and manipulating the press. Great when it helps the company sell products, but not so great when things are going wrong.

      There is plenty of "real news" going on when Apple launch their newest product line, but they still get an amount of press out of proportion to the importance of their products.

      RS

    5. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Droid X has only been out for 2 days, not 22. And they never touted their awesome sexy revolutionary fucking magical new technology that allows you to install a non-signed OS. They haven't been denying that it ever happens. No CEOs have sent smug emails telling all owners of the device in question they're just installing it the wrong way. The problem here isn't anything so egregious as a major antenna issue in a fucking cell phone. The only things in common between that and this are that they are both problems in cell phones.

      If you want to bitch about how oppressed poor little Apple is, you might want to do it someplace a bit more friendly to delusional fanboys.

    6. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the same token, every story about Apple gets dozens of complaints about media hype and free advertisement, so when the flip side of that causes disproportionate reporting of minor issues, you have to accept complaints about disproportionate media attention the other direction, too.

      You can't lament the free advertisement when it helps Apple and then encourage the over-scrutiny when it hurts.

      Either Apple should be held to the same standard as everyone else (in which case, undue attention is undue and worthy of complaint), or Apple's greater positive attention is earned by its greater negative attention.

    7. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to blame Verizon, Motorola or Google because iApple got 7 out of 8 stories on the front page of MSNBC's front page every time Jobs farts? Let's at least be semi-honest here; Apple, via their fantastic PR department, created their own cult of personality and now they have to live with it. Anytime you scream "what about me" at the top of your lungs don't be surprised when the public takes a peculiar interest in your faults.

      If you really want to downplay Apple's place in the world you have to do it for better or for worse. Apple creates the buzz, the media panders to it, vendors have to deal with it in turn. Vendors hold some of the power in how much buzz their products create. If nothing else Motorola admitted in advance the potential faults of their product, they didn't let it ship knowing damn well what was going on but still putting their product on a pedestal without acknowledging the potential for issues.

      Apple is not the victim here, they tried to reap the profits of the buzz and shun their shortcomings. And, yes, the term is Profit, with a capital P. As much as Jobs and company would like to make you think they're in it for the technology, they let a known faulty product out the door ala MicroSoft. If that fact burns your ass maybe it is time you find a new brand to be a fanboi of instead of a witless apologist.

      And on top of all of this? Don't act innocent like Apple doesn't brick their products under the same circumstances. They have since the iPhone was introduced to the public. It is a known fact and downplaying that fact either makes you ignorant or a liar. Which will it be?

    8. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Timmmm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it's not Google's fault that Motorola is so blatantly circumventing the spirit of the OS

      I disagree. Maybe at the beginning Google had to bow to phone manufacturer's wishes, but I think it is popular enough now that they can add a few more requirements in return for getting all the Google apps. For example:

      * You have to provide Android upgrades for a year after the EOL of the phone.
      * You can unlock the bootloader in the same way as the nexus one (but it can void the warranty).
      * You have to provide a non-skinned ROM option.
      * The phone has to pass some kind of conformance test. Maybe they already do this, but it's clearly not a great test if the they do; e.g. most phones don't support call recording, behave very differently when they are sleeping, and so on.

    9. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears Motorola is also offering the iPhone. At least, it is the same thing to me.

    10. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by mounthood · · Score: 1

      It is sad, that's for sure, but at the same time it's unfair to blame Android for this debacle. Android is the OS, and it's not Google's fault that Motorola is so blatantly circumventing the spirit of the OS..

      Google could use GPL3.

      To submit code you have to waive copyright/patent claims. http://source.android.com/source/cla-individual.html I can't see them switching the license. It would really be a dick move, but it would be just desserts for the telecoms.

      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
    11. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fault is Google's as well. They could demand that the OS remain open source, instead they went with profit. Google does own the rights to Android do they not? They can also set the terms for it's license.

      To claim that Google isn't at fault here is a bit disingenuous, when they are the ones who have the ability to enforce openness and failed to do so.

    12. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by webdog314 · · Score: 1

      And of course, AT&T has nothing to do with any of Apple's problems.

    13. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly all those things have been done (require upgrades, non-skinned, unlocked).
      It is called a "Google experience" device, and is sold exclusively by..... Google.

      The last one of this kind was the "Nexus One".

      Unfortunately, too few of the people whining on this thread here were willing to pony up the money and buy one online.
      Hence, Google concluded that the "unlocked phone" is not a good idea, and stopped the program.

      in other news.... people buying "locked" phones like hot-cakes, and the Droid 2 sold out the first day.

      Now, if YOU were to run a business, which one would YOU make more of???

    14. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by westlake · · Score: 1

      If this was the iPhone they were talking about, there would be front page stories in all the major newspapers and websites saying what a crappy company Apple is for locking down their device.

      No.

      The iPhone targets the buyer who wants a stylish up-marker smart phone with all the latest conveniences and none of the hassle. The buyer who will - never - willingly crack out open the case or stray from the vetted online store.

      That makes the lock-down a front page story only for the geek.

         

    15. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by fermion · · Score: 1
      Licensing agreements can say anything. Therefore either this is another case of Google having no experience in a market and making a huge mistake, or Google understanding the market and leaving the opportunity for closed devices to exist in an effort to grow market share.

      In any case it is Googles fault because they could have written the license to prevent this, and for some reason, either through ignorance or not caring, explicitly or implicitly chose to allow phone hardware to become closed.

      OTOH, it is not googles fault because until Apple opened up the App store and allowed a level of freedom, the American phone market has been closed, so Google is just following the status quo. It is true that several months later, Blackberry opened it App store, but it is essentially had the same limitations as the Apple App store, in that Apps had to be approved, be commercial, and not contain obscenity.

      The whole brouhaha over the Apple store was silly because the phone was much more open. The only reason to complain was by the carriers as it transfered power from them to the Apple and the user. Before this the carriers charged obscene fees to download content, such as ringtones(ringtones can be made free in garageband), in the same way they still charge obscene fees to text.

      The brouhaha over Android is also silly. The only thing Android promised was an opened app development process, which it has provided. Obviously, to anyone who is objective, Android returns the some power to the carrier in exchange to allowing the user to play games and watch porn. The carriers, not Google, designs the phone that will maximize profit to the carrier, not Google or Apple.

      I will say that if it requires a paid trip to the carrier to unbrick the phone this is a significant decline in phone quality. Most people I know who brick their iphones can unbrick it with going to Apple.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Google does own the rights to Android do they not? They can also set the terms for it's license."

      This is a common and unfortunate misconception shared by many people. Android is not owned by Google. It is Open Source and there are 71 companies involved in the Open Handset Alliance. Google is but one of those companies. What is confusing people it that they think Open Source always means GPL, when in fact the Apache2 license is what is used by the Android project. Unfortunately, due to abuse of the mod system combined with Slashdot's complete inability to folllow it's own policy against said abuse, I'm posting at -1 these days, so this post won't even be seen by most of the people who need to see it :-(

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re:OMG! Whatever shall we do? by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      GPL would have been preferable as it would have forced the telecom folks to give back to the community. You make it sound as if the Apache license is a good thing. It basically gives wireless providers free reign to add (or remove) any features they deem fit:

      According to the Android FAQ page, "The Apache license allows manufacturers and mobile operators to innovate using the platform without the requirement to contribute those innovations back to the open-source community." The page promises that "industry players can add proprietary functionality to their products based on Android without needing to contribute anything back to the platform," and, to be sure, "companies can remove functionality if they choose."

      GPL would have been much more preferable. Google was busy greasing the wallets of the wireless providers while promising the moon to the tech crowd. This is the result. Shocking but true. The wireless providers are more interested in keeping control of their hardware platform then they are catering to the open source community.

      Who'd have thought?

      As to licensing, Google defines the license that Android is sold under. It was acquired by Google, along with the rights to Android of course. The fact remains that the person making a work available under *ANY* type of copyright license has the right to revoke that license unless they specifically waived those rights. They couldn't effect any existing releases of Android as they have already licensed those and released them to the wild so to speak, but they can most certainly revoke or change licensing terms for future releases.

  18. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just because you have discovered an unbricking technique does NOT invalidate the fact that it WAS in fact bricked.

    Bricking is not defined as forever.

    Bricking means the device is hosed and cannot be recovered without breaking in and modifying the hardware.

    Breaking into the JTAG interface of a consumer device and reprogramming PROM are definitely hardware modification techniques that are non-trivial.

  19. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Smauler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is another term that has entered the popular lexicon and got warped. If a device is bricked, _no one_ can reactivate it - it is dead. If someone can revive the device for a fee, it's not bricked.... it's just something you probably should not have bought in the first place. Bricked means bricked - and I've had a few devices go that way on me because of mistakes.

  20. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by sortius_nod · · Score: 1, Informative

    Riddle me this:

    Why are PSPs considered "bricked" when you can get a pandora's battery and "unbrick" them. Perspective has nothing to do with it, if the system is shut down and a user cannot reset it to defaults without the aid of specialist "tools", it's bricked.

    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer. This concept is alien to most users.

    You talk about perception, get off the high horse and look at things from a user perspective. Bricked is bricked, and there's no interpretation to it.

  21. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bricked is permanent.

    Well then by your definition it's pretty much impossible to "brick" a device without otherwise destroying it, as it's always possible to "unbrick" it by replacing code (whether via JTAG, secret button presses or other means) or swapping components.

    Back in the real world, it's a relative term. If you can't unbrick your device then as far as you are concerned it's bricked, even if the manufacturer or someone with a bit more brains could actually fix it for you.

  22. Pay attention, Motorola. Masonry lesson. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No approved software -> one kind of brick.

    Approved software -> another kind of brick.

    Any questions?

  23. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by rdebath · · Score: 1

    No you're saying nothing is ever bricked because by improving your ability or paying someone else you can always get it fixed. This is wrong.

    In truth the 'normal' way of flashing your WRT54G can still brick the router because you can't fix the problem using the same technique that you got into trouble in the first place. OTOH JTAG flashing of the router does indeed seem to be unable to brick the device because you can always fix the problem.

    That just leaves where you draw the line. IMO the requirements for doing a WRT54G JTAG are too far, ie soldering the board and guessing (parts of) the protocol. But (for example) an edge connector with available documentation would be okay. So you see I put the line at about "Could a professional outsider reasonably fix it without being required to damage or permanently change anything?".

  24. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people have any idea what they are talking about ? eFuse is nothing more than electronic fuses, a code which is programmed into a chip electronically, call it blown into the device. This code is probably an encryption key. What Motorola has done is implementing secure boot on their devices. This means that the phone can only run firmware encrypted and signed code. Just like for example is done in gaming consoles. If they do it well, it's very hard to hack. Unless you know the keys.

  25. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by adolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Breaking in? It's not like it took prybars and hammers to open the thing. A WRT54G opens with a quick tug using no tools other than a pair of reasonably-strong hands.

    Modifying the hardware? A little. But the JTAG header was right there on the board, IIRC it was even labeled. All I had to do was solder some pins to it to be able to plug a cable into it. And I could have done it without even going that far: after all, I just needed electrical continuity, and nowhere is it written that this must involve physical modification. (Soldering is easier for one individual device, but if I had a lot of them to fix I'd have come up with something less invasive.)

    Breaking into the JTAG interface? To reprogram the PROM? You've gone off of the deep end. JTAG is a bog-standard and rather simple interface for dealing with flash at a low level. And PROMs aren't reprogrammable.

    Another reason why the device was not bricked was that it was not physically damaged: No eFuse was blown, no parts had turned to smoke, and never was it in any particular danger. It just had a bad firmware load. In other words, it was experiencing a software problem. So I loaded new software that worked, once I learned how.

    *shrug*

    In other news, some layfolk also think that a PC with a crapfested install of Windows is bricked beyond help. This opinion is, of course, wrong. But it is based on their perspective and ability.

    To use a car analogy: I have a dead GM 4L30E automatic transmission out back which died suddenly in my BMW. I fixed the car by replacing the transmission, which I knew how to do, so at no time was the whole car a brick. Now: Could the 4L30E be fixed? I guess so, but I don't know how to do that, so the tranny itself is still bricked. To someone else with different perspective and ability, it might be a quick fix, but that someone ain't me. If the day comes that I gain the ability to understand and fix automatic transmissions, or I give it to someone else who already understands these things, then it may cease being a brick.

  26. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by noidentity · · Score: 1
    Thank you for this injection of sanity. I was beginning to be swayed by this "it's all relative" of other posts, but yours is a clear line. A couple of days ago I hooked an old Linksys router that said 5V to a 12V (which measured more like 15V) transformer. Immediate burning smell. Now it hangs with the red light on, gets hot even at 5V. I'd call it very bricked. Yet, if someone desoldered the chips I fried, they could probably revive it. But your definition makes it clear: the case must be opened and parts desoldered to fix it.

    And now I'm regaining more sanity here (thanks again)... we already had a word for what I did: I broke the hell out of it. It needs to be repaired. Bricked is a term describing breakage done entirely by software, which requires special tools (hardware, or perhaps special signed binaries), or even hardware repair, to remedy. The point is that you screwed it up beyond something you as an average user can remedy, merely by doing things in software, or maybe hooking the wrong adaptor to it, without forcing anything. THAT is a useful concept, because usually such simple things don't render a device unusable to yourself. Ahhhh, now the word has regained a useful meaning for me again.

  27. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A "bricked" PSP that can be recovered using a Pandora battery is not bricked at all. It is far more useful than a brick. All it takes is a widget to tell the device to boot from whatever it is that is in the card slot instead of its internal flash. This widget happens to be known as a Pandora battery, and the only thing that is special about it is that its serial number consists of zeroes.

    Bricks don't do any of that stuff: I have a pile of them out back, and none of them possess these abilities. A genuinely bricked PSP would resemble a brick, not an electronic device that can easily be brought back to usefulness.

    Regarding "user perspective," I have bricked a lot of things (both electronic and mechanical) that I was simply unable to fix myself while being unwilling or unable to pay someone else to do it.

    Nonetheless, I am a PSP user. And I am a WRT54G user. And a Droid user. I use them all in ways other than what the instructions say that I should be able to, but that doesn't make me less of a user -- I'm just a user with a different perspective than most have.

  28. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by AftanGustur · · Score: 1

    There, fixed that for you. Bricked is permanent. Non-permanent "bricking" isn't bricking at all. If you can revive it, it was never bricked in the first place.

    They newer said that you can revive it.

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  29. No excuse by The+Hatchet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as a device or any part of a device is sold with a feature that says "you are prohibited from doing what you want with something you paid disgusting amounts of money for" Then something is wrong.

    When you buy something, it should be yours to do whatever the fuck you want with it. There is no reason that someone else has any right to tell you what you are allowed to do with your possessions. Hell, if someone came into my house and forced me to stop using super glue to attach everything to everything else, I would have him fucking arrested for trespassing. If they are going to tell you what to do with your devices, then they should replace the word 'buy' with the word 'use until we decide otherwise, within the bounds of what we think is ok' I bet people wouldn't pay such shit-tons of money for every little gizmo if it said that instead.

    --
    Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    1. Re:No excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... so why are feature/messaging phones so much like this?
      Same logic applies to video game console systems? HP laptops (whitelisted hardware)?
      How about AT&T "removing" the ability to install programs from non-market places?

    2. Re:No excuse by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      I don't think Motorola is going to come to your house and tell you what you can and can't do with your device. You can do whatever you want with it. That doesn't mean Motorola has to make it easy. It's like if I messed with the firmware in my car and then blamed the manufacturer when it no longer works.

    3. Re:No excuse by Nethead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you buy something, it should be yours to do whatever the fuck you want with it. There is no reason that someone else has any right to tell you what you are allowed to do with your possessions.

      So I guess that you also have issues with laws against use of fully automatic machine guns.

      It's also illegal to use a spark-gap transmitter these days. Hell, I have commercial Motorola radios that I hack but it's still illegal for me to use them on frequencies that I'm not licensed for. But hey, I bought it and should be able to use it as I want.

      Your comment is over generalized, immature and selfish.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:No excuse by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I don't think Motorola is going to come to your house and tell you what you can and can't do with your device.

      You've never read the software license for Motorola RSS.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:No excuse by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      If the phone is sitting on your kitchen table, and they disable it, they are practically in your home. And its not like if you messed with the firmware in your car and it stopped working. It's more like if you did some custom mods to your car, which then detected them, and with manufacturer programming waited until the car is going 60 mph and shuts down the brakes, power steering, on-star if you have it, and forces you to crash and die for messing with their products.

      There is a big difference between "whoops I broke it" and a self disabling device that prohibits certain behaviors with the device, and destroys the device if you do anything outside a set range of preset behaviors, on purpose.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    6. Re:No excuse by The+Hatchet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There is a very big difference between laws for general public safety, such as "don't go out and shoot a ton of people" and organization of public resources (rf bandwidth management, it would certainly suck if noone on your block could hear their favorite radio station because you had to make a phone call). Those are very different than a company deciding that they are going to have full control over your device and prevent you from using it at your leisure harmlessly. That would be like an anti-gay dildo company that made dildos, which upon vaginal use were fine, but if used in a but immediately exploded and killed the individual. You buy something, it should be all means be yours to use for anything you want within the law.

      Also, I might note you are kinda like this moron from xkcd: http://xkcd.com/169/
      My point was very clear, but you distract from it with criticisms which have no practical point and show a purposed misunderstanding of my post. And then trying to couple it with an insult? If you are going to act like a retarded 5 year old on crack, don't do it on slashdot.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    7. Re:No excuse by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      To be fair - a lot of android sites talk about rooting your phone like its installing some app - no caution or warning at all. These days I work at a community college and I end up fixing a lot of phones (they've asked us to help students/faculty with whatever the best we can) - you'd be surprised how many rooted phones I've come across that aren't behaving properly and how many people have rooted these without any real knowledge to what they did - these are more often users who aren't even remotely technical.

      Restoring a rooted phone can be kinda tricky sometimes as the modified bootloader often won't load the stock rom anymore (HTC Eris is a good example of this).

      The most likely reason why Motorola (and HTC more and more lately) did this is simply because they (and Verizon/Sprint/AT&T/T-Mobile) are sick to death of trying to support hacked phones - because people really truely do call in about issues with their phones after they have been rooted.

      Having done front line support (at one of these call center mills no less) I can sympathize - its often better to prevent users from screwing their phones up rather than tell people that they are unsupported because they screwed the phone up and to fix it they'll have to send it in and pay to have it restored.

      It may not be right, but I do understand why.

    8. Re:No excuse by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      Sure, that would make sense if people hadn't paid for warranties, or for support. And if it is such a terrible problem, perhaps they should work on increasing adaptability and security of the product they sell, instead of making in self-destruct for any variety of reasons. Also, if a person is paying a monthly bill to the company, they are paying more than enough for support, considering mobile plans cost more in the US than many other countries.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    9. Re:No excuse by The+Hatchet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You posted a comment that was clearly meant to cause flaming. Clearly misinterpreting an obvious statement is not amusing or interesting or insightful, it is trolling. You replied with a clear trollful statement intended to create flame, and I called it. Grow up.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    10. Re:No excuse by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Mr. AC.

      Under normal conditions I would agree with you. But do consider if you were a club for over a decade, and helped build that club (I hosted images.slashdot.com for free before it was a commercial site) and then some new hot-head potty mouth came in and started telling you how to behave in your club... I would think that a "get off my lawn" moment would be just the start of it.

      I never said I was smarter, but considering the tone of his original post I think he needs to cool down and think a bit before he posts.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    11. Re:No excuse by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be a surprise that support is like an insurance pool. The company your calling may lose the entire sale profit if you have to call for support. I know in software this is true.

      With the monthly fee you have a point though - so who knows. Support is a cost center - usually doesn't profit in any meaningful way so reducing that cost is always a big deal.

  30. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all depends on how easy it is to reinstall the software.

    No, it doesn't. Brick means it's gone. No fixy. Buy another, thanks for playing. If the software can be reinstalled, even with great difficulty, you don't say "bricked."

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My car is totalled because it needs a new air filter, which requires me to break into and modify the hardware by opening the hood and unscrewing a wingnut.

  33. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny... cause the USB cable is in the box the phone came with.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  34. Main problem would be EOL-ed devices by saikou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition to marketoids demanding that you use Blur, there's a bigger problem. Once the device is marked as End of Life (and original Droid already is, right? Been less than a year) I kinda doubt that Motorola will dedicate any resources to bolding Blur onto newer revisions of Android.
    Which means users will be stuck in a certain version. Even though new ones could theoretically be used, as hardware is powerful enough (or it could be stripped down by geniuses from XDA Dev :) )
    At least they need to disable eFuse on "no longer supported" devices. Otherwise, just another example of planned obsolescence (and even worse than iPhone).

    1. Re:Main problem would be EOL-ed devices by DramaGeek · · Score: 1

      That's the point. If you can't add the new features, they think you'll buy a new phone. Some people will, but rarely anybody who would have rooted their phone. Rooters will just get a different phone in the first place, like a Nexus 1 or something by HTC.

    2. Re:Main problem would be EOL-ed devices by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Rooters will just get a different phone in the first place, like a Nexus 1 or something by HTC.

      Actually, I'd argue the opposite is true. People who root and reflash tend to be fanatically loyal to their phone's maker compared to "normal" users. Why? Because people who root & reflash invested lots of time acquiring familiarity with their phone's architecture, to the point where Android phones by other makers seem to be ENORMOUSLY more different & alien than they do to "normal" users. Not to mention the fact that 95% of their casual daily online social lives probably revolve around others who are ALSO into rooting and customizing their phones. These aren't users who'll switch to Samsung or HTC because the bundled Twitter client has a pretty translucent blue background instead of a red one, and they prefer blue instead.

      The truth is, if Motorola hadn't fucked up their later phones, nearly every single owner of a rooted Droid would have eventually bought a Motorola phone to replace it. If you read around the various sites, the users who are the most upset and screaming the loudest about this are people who own a Verizon Droid *right now*, because up to this point the idea of replacing it someday with a non-Motorola phone was borderline-unthinkable. In a very real way, they feel like they've been kicked in the balls and shat upon by someone they admired.

  35. Fuck your software. by unity100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i am buying a DEVICE from you. that is a mobile phone. i am not buying a device AND a software. i dont care about your reasons, your justifications, your logic, this that and shit. if you force me to anything after BUYING a device, i will fuck it and do what i want. if there is no possibility of doing that, i wont buy your product, and you can gleefully shove it up your ass.

    how do you like this as the opinion of customers ? distasteful isnt it ? well, you asked for it.

    1. Re:Fuck your software. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even more broadly, the engineering time they waste maintaining an undesired feature is time not spent making the product line better. So far, the MOTO Droid line isn't pulling the company back to profitability last I checked.

      I thought GPL 3 forbade this kind of activity of preventing firmware changes, it undermines one major point of open source while still exploiting open source code. Maybe that language didn't make it into the final license.

    2. Re:Fuck your software. by jisatsusha · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought GPL 3 forbade this kind of activity of preventing firmware changes, it undermines one major point of open source while still exploiting open source code. Maybe that language didn't make it into the final license.

      It does. Android is GPLv2 and Apache 2.0 licensed, therefore that does not apply here.

    3. Re:Fuck your software. by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=164034

      Android has saved their bacon. And this new model is doing very well, and probably will continue to. The numbers of people who are into running custom ROM's is not enough to make a dent in the sales.. The custom ROM users will go elsewhere, and there will be awesome alternatives for them.. and they will turn their technical noses down on the people who purchase the phone, because they (those idiots) can't do something that most of them would not do anyway.. It's bad for Motorola, as it was these very type of people (the geeks into doing ROM installs) who where a large part of the successful launch of the Droid.. they are the type who brag with enthusiasm about their phone and what it can do to the people with glazed over eyes who don't know the best way to spend their money on a new phone.. but the Droid brand already has made it's dent, and the sales of the newer version show that the brand has worked.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    4. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, they don't want to deal with them in warranty. Even if people knowingly bricked their phone by attaching a car battery to it they will still hit up the warranty department with a cock and bull story about how it isn't their fault. Clogs up the warranty department and costs the company time and money.

      Second, they cannot allow hacking the device to become mainstream. We aren't talking about people loading Linux on their phone to get a shell, the primary reason people want to hack their phone is theft of software. Which harms the platform because the vibrancy of the android platform requires high-quality software. If it is known that your aren't going to make money selling software that will limit the kinds of software available on that platform and that will limit the popularity of Android phones.

      Third, hacking the phone can potentially open also sorts of attacks up on the cellular network. How long before people start listening to each others phone calls, hijacking calls, making calls on other peoples accounts, or just creating a DoS attack against the towers. How secure are those cell towers? I don't think we want to know.

      Fourth, you do buy hardware software from the company. That is non-negotiable. You are buying a complete product not components.

      Cryptographically signed software that starts from bootstrap is going to probably land on all devices eventually to help control costs, improve security, and maintain the revenue stream. They don't have to prevent you from cracking them forever, just until the next update.

    5. Re:Fuck your software. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      The key pieces that make the phone go are under the GPLv2.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    6. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      Linux is licensed under GPL v2.

    7. Re:Fuck your software. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Fifth, i dont buy it, and they shove it up their ass.

      i dont care about their problems. i am the customer, i make the decisions. i decide upon what i want. not what they want or they can give. if they cannot provide me what they want, what's left for them involves their product, and their ass.

    8. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the futility of not buying it based solely on the fact you don't like them coupling the the software and hardware. Every phone on the market running Android or iOS already implement some level of cryptographic lock out. This isn't going to diminish over time for the reasons I mentioned and a few I am sure I missed. I am going to guess 99+% of customers don't care to hack their phone and they aim to keep it that way.

      They will all sell millions of phones with or without your help and I doubt many of them will end up in someone's ass.

    9. Re:Fuck your software. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      let me talk from a non tech affluent customers' mouth : i dont know about these androids and ioses. give me a phone that wont go brick on me whatever i do.

      thats whats happening in the market i am at least.

    10. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what they are doing. For the non-tech affluent they are providing a phone that won't brick. It is guaranteed to work exactly the way it did the day you bought it.

      If you want a phone to hack maybe you should buy the Google Developer phone from HTC. There the only limitation is screwing with the bootloader and the fact that the current model only supports 1.6 of Android and that you are on the now ancient HTC Magic.

    11. Re:Fuck your software. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      non tech affluent people here, are having tech affluent people hack their phones.

    12. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.

    13. Re:Fuck your software. by /dev/trash · · Score: 0

      well you and the 0.00001% of the general public can stick to your principles.

    14. Re:Fuck your software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of Motorola: *YAWN*

    15. Re:Fuck your software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the Motorola device does not fit your needs and wants. Why be so emotional about it? Are you a 12 year old that believes thoriwng insults affects anyone? Just buy something else.

    16. Re:Fuck your software. by unity100 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why i am so emotional about it, and why i am throwing insults like a 12 year old.

      freedom, maybe ? that is what what they are doing makes me feel.

    17. Re:Fuck your software. by zaffir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We aren't talking about people loading Linux on their phone to get a shell, the primary reason people want to hack their phone is theft of software.

      [citation needed]

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    18. Re:Fuck your software. by Criton · · Score: 1

      Sorry I disagree with you I should not be forced to use the company's e-store for software and media files. If a company wants to be that way then it can go under for all I care.

    19. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      And yet that isn't a mainstream point of view. Not everyone wants to write software. If you want to write your own software there are some legitimate ways to do that and signing up with Apple will cost you $99/year and Android is going to cost you the price of a phone $399.

      While I completely understand your point of view it is generally believed the app store and music store are major drivers of the success of the smartphone.

      It strikes me as funny that just a couple of years ago this problem didn't even exist. Nobody bitched about not being able to install software on the phone because all phones sucked and there was no general market for software on phones. What little there was in the form of Symbian or J2ME apps wasn't even guaranteed to work on the same hardware with different carriers. iPhone changed that and now we can bitch about the openness of their app store or that Android phones are coming out that lock you out of modifying the OS.

    20. Re:Fuck your software. by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seem to remember there was much more public outcry when they tried to do similar things to lock down control of PCs and laptops to software authorized by one manufacturer. Everyone just sort of laughed it off saying "that'll never fly".

      But I guess mobile phones have always kinda locked down. Still, the difference a generation makes!

    21. Re:Fuck your software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just thought it might be worth pointing out -- the "vibrancy" of the Linux-PC platform also comes from the wide selection of high-quality software made for it. I've used nothing but opensource software for years on my home PC, and couldn't be more pleased with it.

      As for the cell network, it needs to be secure on its own. Anybody can buy the parts and build a board to talk to a cell tower...

    22. Re:Fuck your software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is installing linux stealing software are you an idiot?
      All it does is free the phone from the carrier's bullshit and nothing more.
      Customers have a right to avoid being nickel and dimed by their carrier.

    23. Re:Fuck your software. by the+entropy · · Score: 1

      How did that get to +4 interesting?

      First, you may have a point with the warranty issue, however they can simply take the route google does with the Nexus One => You can unlock the phone but it voids your warranty, I'm pretty sure official software that unlocks the phone along with saying that is easier and cheaper to accomplish than attempts to make the phone un-hackable.

      Second, how does hacking your phone give you the ability to "steal software" ? From where would you be stealing it? Software-wise you can pretty much install anything you want, rooting the phone is only useful to load custom firmware not software.

      Third, "I don't think we want to know". Security through obscurity? If there are are any security issues with the cell towers then yes we want to know and we want them to be fixed. Having your head in the sand doesn't make the problem go away. And the problem *will* be exploited by malicious users wanting to cause harm(say, terrorists wanting to take down the cell network).

      Fourth, that's debatable but I won't go into that particular one now as it's a whole other discussion and your point of view is a valid one even though I may not agree with it.

    24. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      Voiding the warranty isn't something that shoots off flares and calls home invalidating the warranty. They will still end up having to deal with claims that run through the warranty process, get mailed to some facility, get inspected, deemed void, and either returned or disposed of via recycling. None of which is free.

      If your phone is jailbroken you can use software illegally. I assume you can figure the rest out.

      Security through obscurity? No, security through active denial of access via handsets and commodity hardware. Obscurity is not a factor. Part of the security of the system is the handset side and not just for the network but for the user. Hacking your phone is disabling your own security.

    25. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say installing Linux is stealing. I said, "We aren't talking about people loading Linux on their phone to get a shell, the primary reason people want to hack their phone is theft of software." Which says, this isn't about people putting linux on their phone for fun or for the hell of it. This is specifically about circumventing the security mechanisms of a device for the sole purpose of dodging contractual obligations, and installation of illegally obtained software. I should have included theft of service in that statement.

      Customers have a right to avoid being nickel and dimed by their carrier.

      Customers have no such right. Read the contract you signed.

      If you are stating it shouldn't be legal, that is a different thing. In the US where customers have almost no protections, in part because we don't want legal protections from abusive contracts because to some it sounds like the loss of freedom, they write exactly this sort of crap into the contracts you are obligated to sign to obtain service.

    26. Re:Fuck your software. by nbahi15 · · Score: 0

      See bittorrent for examples.

      It is the unfortunate side of homebrew software on cellular phones. I am all for people writing software to put on their phone for free, but the way it is done is by stripping the protections of the operating system that serves several purposes. Enforcement of software downloaded only being run on authorized users handsets, circumvention of the OS protections against malicious code execution by virtue of only signed software being run on the device.

  36. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

    Funny... cause the USB cable is in the box the phone came with.

    I was just about to post this. For my LG phone the wall charger is just an adapter for the USB cable. Specialist tool indeed.

  37. Hi by staciarosa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks for the insight! There is a lot of helpful information within those links.Nice site! Very professional and full of information. http://www.baiyokefactory.com/

  38. Remember the A780? Mot sucked then, suck now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I learned my lesson about Motorola back when I bought a Motorola A780 (Linux smartphone). I was hoping that it would be a platform like what Android is now. Boy was I wrong. They handcuffed developers at every turn. The A780 had a built-in GPS, but the API was never released to the public. OS updates were few and far in between. It had an ABYSMAL user interface. I honestly don't know how they let this POS out the door.

    I use InDesign because I refuse to give Quark any money. I'll buy an HTC because I refuse to give Motorola any money.

  39. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly, I'd be interested in knowing how they rooted the phone and then changed the boot ROMs without using a USB cable...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  40. Fair enough - If it works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Will I be able to freeze Motorola's bank account (since my money is in it, after all) if they do something I don't agree with? Then restore it once they meet my criteria? Otherwise, no sale.

  41. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Bricked means bricked

    I hear you! There's a former Asus 500w Premium router I bricked once that I regret. But all in all it was worth it to me. The cost of doing business.

    I really like running DD-WRT on cheap routers, and over time, I've bricked one or two; and I accept I broke the manufacturer's warranty by attempting the 'upgrade' in the first place. Those things deliver international office VPN/VOIP functions that more than offset the cost & loss of a few bricked routers overall. I can accept a few bricks

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  42. Tivoization is a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You don't own the device you supposedly bought.

    Avoid such hardware like the plague.

    1. Re:Tivoization is a bitch by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      You do own the device. Being able to use it is another matter entirely.

  43. Proper hacking. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Why was it not bricked for me? Because I already knew how to fix it: Enable shadow ROM on another computer, and plug the improperly-flashed BIOS into it hot. Then, just re-flash with the correct image, put the hardware back where it was, and move on with life.

    You are a proper hacker. You're Doin' It Right.

    1. Re:Proper hacking. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Hotplugging is dangerous though, and any self-respecting hacker is going to have a ROM burner on his bench.

      That said, I've hot-plugged NVRAM modules in UltraSparc boxes to break past firmware passwords.

    2. Re:Proper hacking. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Aha, but will that let you flash the image off the disk onto the chip? You've still got to figure out what weirdass way the manufacturer has encoded it on the "easy" installation program.

  44. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bricking means the device is hosed and cannot be recovered without breaking in and modifying the hardware.

    No, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of the word "brick". As defined by Wiktionary:

    Noun
    brick (countable and uncountable; plural bricks)
    1. (countable) A hardened rectangular block of mud, clay etc., used for building.
    This wall is made of bricks .

    A brick is something you build houses with. A device that is in a state of non-function is called a "brick" because that's about all you could do with it. A device that I don't know how to return to a functioning state to me is a brick. If you know how to fix it, then to you it is not a brick, and if you offer to help me fix it then it is no longer a brick to me either. That's what adolf is saying, and I agree. Take a second to let that sink in and maybe you will understand.

  45. Fuck your money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are selling you a DEVICE that makes phone calls. a device AND software that makes the device work. and how the device and software work is OUR responsibility and right to keep 100% control of. forever. we invented the shit. its ours. we didnt have HAVE to let you play with our toys and technology at all. so long as it makes phone calls you can piss up a rope. i dont care about your reasons, your justifications, your logic. you have NO right to do ANYTHING with this device that we did not intend! If we don't like what you ARE doing with our device. We can turn your device 'off' for as long as we wish.

    if you dont like it and wont agree to that.. we wont sell you our fucking product!

    yep. they asked for it i guess. distasteful? meh... seems ok to me.

  46. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riddle me this:

    Why are PSPs considered "bricked" when you can get a pandora's battery and "unbrick" them.

    Because PSP owners are retards.

  47. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by noidentity · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a house built of bricked devices. Then you could definitively say that they were literally bricked.

  48. This is a logic bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and people go to jail for them, thats probably why we are seeing Motorola stammer and say its reversible
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_bomb

    "A logic bomb is a piece of code intentionally inserted into a software system that will set off a malicious function when specified conditions are met."

    now whos first to file charges ?

  49. Developer/tinkerer friendly Android device? by Graftweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just out of curiosity, does anyone know of any android device that's meant by the manufacturer to be tinkered with? No protected bootloaders, read only filesystems, or any other such shenanigans that are meant to make the task of installing custom ROMs as difficult as possible.

    I know the Nexus One is supposed to be very easy to root, and thus developer friendly, but unfortunately it's not available everywhere.

    1. Re:Developer/tinkerer friendly Android device? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      And equally unfortunately, it's only available to some carriers as it doesn't support all the right frequencies and is a GSM type phone.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Developer/tinkerer friendly Android device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HTC G1 is still easy to root. Not as easy as the Nexus, but easy nonetheless. I rooted my girlfriend's G1 a few weeks ago. Yes, it's old and slow, yes the battery life sucks, but it can run Android 2.2 (Froyo), the latest release (3.0, Gingerbread, is still several months away).

    3. Re:Developer/tinkerer friendly Android device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly the ODROID (ODROID-S, ODROID-T and ODROID) series from Hardkernel.

      Hell,they ship the schematics and the "boot rom" is a SDHC card.

    4. Re:Developer/tinkerer friendly Android device? by DramaGeek · · Score: 1

      It took about 20 min to root my Droid, and I haven't looked back since. If you're not in the USA, I don't believe that anybody's yet cracked the Milestone (overseas Droid), though.

  50. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bricked and dead are often two different things.

    No, they are not.

  51. Locked down things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many different reasons to lock things down. There is a reason for gaming consoles, is that the company wants to stop piracy of games. The reason to lock down audio players is again to stop piracy of music. Now the reason for locking down an android-based phone isn't piracy, it is pressure from the telecommunications companies. There may be other reasons (such as artificially shortening product life), but I think they are less important. I do think there should be a big yellow sticker on every locked down device telling you that this device is locked down.

    Anyway what i wish more is that there were GSM radio chips whose interface is so simple, that you couldn't do anything nasty with it. There could be a radio interface that has a one-to-one correspondence with the android API. This interface could be completely open, and documented, maybe even standardized. The radio chip firmware could be locked down, but nobody will care about it. Not most hackers anyway. The telecom companies wouldn't care for the standard software to be locked down, as it doesn't give any more power to the customers to do nasty things on their network. Then things like companies refusing to release all source code might be rare, and you wouldn't have to rely on binary compiled rild, or reverse engineering to release your own open rom. By the way, does the official G1 phone have an open source rild, can you have all code that runs on the software processor be open source? I always assumed no, but please correct me if i'm wrong.

    The reason presented by motorola, is just going the wrong way about it. Only running pre-approved roms might be a feature for something like a company who wants to buy phones for its employees.I can see nothing wrong about this company controlling something they own. It is so easy to add spy apps to unlocked android phones, that I see no reason to why industrial espionage whouldn't be common. But the entity that owns the phone should in my opinion be able to disable the locking. It is always a feature if you can prevent someone doing something to your phone, but it is a misfeature if you are prevented from doing something with your own phone.

  52. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by grumbel · · Score: 1

    If a device is bricked, _no one_ can reactivate it - it is dead

    If you throw enough money at a thing you can revive even a dead hunk of clay. By your definition nothing is ever bricked, since there is always some way to revive something. The only useful definition of "bricked" is the one where a bricked device needs special tools for recovery that weren't needed for installing the modification in the first place, aka your path of recovery is blocked. One can probably make a few exception if the special tools aren't so special, but common household items, but once it involved soldering or replacing chips on the board, thats a brick.

  53. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bricked is permanent.

    Well then by your definition it's pretty much impossible to "brick" a device without otherwise destroying it, as it's always possible to "unbrick" it by replacing code (whether via JTAG, secret button presses or other means) or swapping components.

    Back in the real world, it's a relative term. If you can't unbrick your device then as far as you are concerned it's bricked, even if the manufacturer or someone with a bit more brains could actually fix it for you.

    Devices based on the TMS320F28xx series processors can be bricked to the point that the CPU must be replaced.
    The security features of the chip is programmed wrong can lock the chip in a way that it can never be unlocked!
    This is not the only CPU that exhibits this feature. you can't even recover it with JTAG

  54. News at 11 - beige box = hard drive by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's slang that used to mean it's as useful as a house brick and there is no way back to making it useful. Others took it up to sound cool and started using it for random inconvenience. That has confused everyone which is why we get these silly aruments.
    I've used it today in the context of a device that HP techs could not get working again after return and that's the sort of thing a lot of readers expect here when they see "brick", good as a doorstop but not good for the original purpose.
    In my mind it's the same as calling the beige box on the floor a "hard drive" or those idiots that call a MAC address a hostid but if people understand what you mean it ultimately doesn't matter.
    There's no point about being a pedant about people misusing slang just to try to sound cool.

    1. Re:News at 11 - beige box = hard drive by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you are agreeing with me or arguing with me (or the parent)...

    2. Re:News at 11 - beige box = hard drive by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Brick" is relative. My mother's TV is "bricked" if someone clicks the TV/VCR button. A car at ground zero of a car-bomb can be unbricked for (a rough estimate) somewhere around 100 times the cost of the car. I can't conceive of anything that can't be unbricked, unless it's sent into the sun (and even that may change in the future). Maybe a cell phone sitting on top a nuclear bomb when it goes off...

      "Bricked" means that it's no more useful than a brick. If it's cheaper to replace than repair, I'd declare that bricked, even if the repair is trivial (see broken LCD screens on a laptop). Why waste money fixing something rather than replacing it for less cost and trouble? Thus, it's no more useful than a brick. And that level is different for different people.

    3. Re:News at 11 - beige box = hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brick" is relative. My mother's TV is "bricked" if someone clicks the TV/VCR button. A car at ground zero of a car-bomb can be unbricked for (a rough estimate) somewhere around 100 times the cost of the car. I can't conceive of anything that can't be unbricked, unless it's sent into the sun (and even that may change in the future). Maybe a cell phone sitting on top a nuclear bomb when it goes off...

      "This week, on a very special episode of Mythbusters, we do something that'll put those 'Will It Blend' folks to shame..."

    4. Re:News at 11 - beige box = hard drive by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm saying if people understand what you mean it doesn't matter, but if they don't it does matter.
      That's really why people feel annoyed and misled by when they think they are being told "completely useless" when the real answer is merely "can be fixed in ten minutes with google, a free download, and the USB cable you used to mess it up in the first place".
      Maybe we need uber way-gnarly hyper super doubleplusbad bricked or other nonsense to indicate completely useless now :)

  55. Honestly by VulpesFoxnik · · Score: 1

    I think needs to have a few of these bricks thrown through their window, then lets see how they treat their 3rd party developers and customers.

    --
    RES PUBLICA NON DOMINETUR
  56. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So.....from your perspective most of the world is bricked, because you can not fix it. Good god!

  57. Amen! by Weezul · · Score: 1

    I've no idea why people who might want fancy features like VoIP on the phone are still buying phones from these asshats. We all needed to hack our phones once upon a time, but now we've got the N900 that comes out of the box with terminal, sype & voip integration, etc.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Amen! by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I have one sitting in front of me, love it, unfortunately it never really took off for some reason. My speculation is simply that it doesn't do a lot of common things straight out of the box - MMS, in the past USSD, Video Calling - it can do this with Skype / Fring / etc, but not in the traditional way that other phones make video calls over 3G, and so on. Certainly there are solutions to all of these things. A couple of seconds in google or the software updater will have people up and running, but I think there is an expectation for spoon feeding and hand holding. People are even complaining that it doesn't support DRM at all - they want to be able to download music from traditional stores in the same way they can with other devices.

      You need to be a little technically minded to set one up and have it work as a fairly standard phone. It's marketed as a tablet computer with phone features, people mostly get this back to front.

    2. Re:Amen! by Weezul · · Score: 1

      I felt the N900 was rather ra before PR1.2, which fixed the lack video calling for skype and sip, and corrected the major stabilities issues. Yes, USSD was an issue, but the USSD widget is pretty cool.

      Afaik, MMS isn't a high priority feature for most smartphones, probably demographics. Yeah, normal video calling sounds like an issue, but not sure that ever caught one much either.

      Imho, the missing features are encrypted SIP calls via ZRTP/SRTP, encrypted email via gpg, full Ovi maps, and printing. Why? Well, these are features that appeal to business users.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  58. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    JTAG only recovery is considered bricked as it is technically one is hacking the hardware and pushing a new flash to the EEPROM straight down the chip pins. One can do this on all EEPROMS (how do you think they flash them in the factory?) however the exact interface is device dependent, there are even differences in JTAG pin arrangements even if the data format is standardized.

  59. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's easy. They had the brains to fuck it up, but didn't have the brains to put it back right.

  60. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You say the term 'bricked' got warped, which is true enough etymologically, but the reality is also that it got appropriated to fill a gap.

    There isn't a punchy little word that's quite as appealing and new and appropriate to technology (specifically) that describes a device getting temporarily but catastrophically ... um .... hosed/trashed/corrupted.

    People were wanting a word to fill that gap and they grabbed the handiest, sweetest-sounding one around. If there's a beter sounding (and definitionally more sound) word for catastrophically failed tech, we better start using it before it's too late!

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  61. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    You did break the seals on the screws and void the hardware warranty ;)

  62. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer. This concept is alien to most users.

    Huh... what?

    Every mobile phone with a camera comes with a USB cable nowadays. How would otherwise those pictures be transfered to a PC? Furthermore, most if not all phones are nowadays capable of playing MP3 files, which, again, need to be transfered from a PC to the phone. Finally, most (all?) smartphones have calendaring functions which allow/require syncing with a PC. For which they use a USB cable.

    A USB cable is absolutely not alien to current mobile phone users.It hasn't been for the last 5 years, in fact!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  63. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Technically they isn't many ways to be 100% dead, if we are allowing JTAG as not counting as dead, then I guess desoldering and replacing components means it not bricked either. I think most would now agree we have gone too far.

  64. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    so, swapping the CPU is a component that can't physically be swapped?

  65. install the authorised software by krischik · · Score: 1

    I have no idea if in this safe mode it's easy to install the authorized software.

    It's as easy as copying a file called update.zip onto the sd-card and then reboot. But you probably need a specialized equipment called an sd-card reader ;-) .

  66. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ignavus · · Score: 1

    If you mashed up your phone, mixed it with clay, shaped the mass into a rectangular prism, and left it in the sun to dry, then I'd call it bricked.

    To unbrick, just reverse the process.

    Definitions. Why can't people keep them simple, like me?

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  67. that is all well by unity100 · · Score: 1

    hmmmm. how about the below for an approach :

    shove your fucking product, up your ass. let me wake you up to a very important point of free market :

    CUSTOMER MAKES THE DECISIONS. NOT YOU. ITS THE RULE OF FREE MARKET.

    it is as fucking simple as that. we do not care about your woes, your problems, your issues, what you can give, what you cannot give, what rights you think that we deserve, what rights you think that you deserve, this or that.

    if you dont give us what WE want, we wont buy your product. you dont even need to 'not sell' your brick to us.

    say bye bye to your market share ...

    1. Re:that is all well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA!

      Don't even pretend you can resist the latest fad gadgets. You like and buy what you're told to like a good little consumer.

    2. Re:that is all well by unity100 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      enough trolling. youre not even succeeding at it. fuck off.

    3. Re:that is all well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whilst his attitude is troll-y (I'm a different AC), he does have a point.

      You, a representative of the people on the internet, were addressing Motorola. The AC played what the non-human entity Motorola would say back the random strangers that make up the people on the internet.

      And the glib remark about consumers taking what they are told is pretty true. People just accept wankily implemented features and anti-features as they don't know any better, or they believe the BS marketing info from corporations, just like the corps. have taught them to. People seem to accept that computers and gadgets will just crash sometimes, or need rebooting, as that is all they have known. This allows companies to cut down on testing or design that leads to stability, which feeds-back to customer expectations, and into software design and tools. And people don't seem to question things, or want to make themselves more informed about the products they use. This is very frustrating if you want genuinely open gadgets, especially when some people who do see the shortcomings, but get suckered in by the shiny-shiny, and/or fashionableness.

  68. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you know what'd be fun? Let's spends several hours debating the "actual" meaning of a slang term. Can we do hella next? Because my friend says it means "really really" but he's just a fucking retard because I'm positive it means "really really really".

  69. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think you actually even need JTAG. I've borked up many WRT54G's, I think I have pretty much every version kicking around in various places - Just hold a piece of wire on the antenna ground block, then run the other end of it across the flash chip - Some people preferred to short out a specific pin (I forget which one now) but I'd just run the wire over a few until the power light started blinking, TFTP mode, reflash. Never once has this method failed.

  70. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Bricked means the software in programmable ROM is no longer operational. The only way to recover is having access to factory hardware rigs or other special tools that are used to program the devices at the factory.

    If you can't plug in a standard USB cable and run the official upgrade process then the device is bricked.

  71. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by DarkFencer · · Score: 1

    Changing or attempting to change your phone's OS voids it anyway so its a moot point.

  72. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by icebraining · · Score: 1

    You could use bluetooth, at least Nokia phones can do all that. My E65 didn't came with an USB cable nor have I ever required one, usually I just use Wifi to transfer stuff.

  73. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know, I can play games with a brick - can the same be said for a PSP? I don't think so.

  74. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer. This concept is alien to most users.

    There are two problems with this. First of all, we're talking about Touchscreenphones, and I'd suggest to you that ca clear majority of users have, actually, connected their Touchscreenphone to their computer. The first generation iPhones actually needed to be hooked up to the computer to be "activated" because of the moronic non-standard SIM lock they were using, and most iPhone users use tools like iTunes to manage their MP3 libraries. Virtually all Touchscreenphones make a big deal about their ability to play music, something that requires copying the music to them. It's safe to say the vast majority of users aren't using Bluetooth for this.

    The second is we're talking about an instance in which a device will be rendered unusable if, and only if, it has undergone a procedure that involves plugging it into a computer using a USB cable.

    If a device can be rendered usable again using the exact same equipment that was used to render it unusable, and that actually came in the box with it, then I'd say those who are saying the popular definition of "Brick" doesn't apply here. This isn't a case where your Motorola RAZR is rendered unusable if you tap the "Star" button three times, it's a case where your Droid X is rendered unusable if you plug it into a computer, and attempt to load the "wrong" operating system. If this is bricking, then attempting to install Mac OS X onto a Dell by coping a partition over from a Mac is "bricking" a Dell.

    None of the above should be taken as justifying Motorola's decision to require signed operating systems. Just that I think the term "Bricking" doesn't apply here. I think Motorola's actions certainly go against the spirit of openness that Android is supposed to be about, and they certainly violate the "If you sell it to someone, it's their's" rule that we condemn Apple for, even if these moves aren't as extreme as Apple's.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  75. If the customer can't unbrick it, it's a brick. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Bricking is when I can't recover it using tools normally available to the public.

    Sometimes I test devices in the place where they make the firmware.
    I "brick" the product all the time.
    Depending on what type of product it is, I take it to the unbricking lady or to a guy named Jim.
    And they unbrick it.

    Ask any of the lab rats or developers--if you break it in such a manner that it's stupid until they fix it with developer/mfr tools, it's a brick.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  76. Welcome to trusted computing by karlandtanya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this works--which is to say that the phones still sell and Moto suffers only tolerable humiliation, expect to see more.
    And if it does fly, look for it be in your general-purpose computer, soon.

    Let's hope the popular blogs make a big stink about it.
    'Cause nobody is listening to the crackpots on /.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:Welcome to trusted computing by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      Not exactly sure what a 'general-purpose computer' is, but anyway, I think you're being a bit paranoid here. This sort of tech is certainly not going to be in my general-purpose computer any time soon, or ever, because I am simply never going to purchase a computer that doesn't allow me to customize it to my heart's content. And there will always be components available to build one that don't have this kind of bullshit built in. The day we can't get components like that is the day our problems are much bigger, and scarier.

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    2. Re:Welcome to trusted computing by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      If it does work, look for the carriers to demand the feature in their handsets from every manufacture so that the ball can be placed back in their courts, not Google's. Then we're back to "want, apps, you have to use the Vcast store. Oh and developers, we take a 60% cut if you want it approved for our customers".

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    3. Re:Welcome to trusted computing by karlandtanya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      google or wikipedia can help you with the concept of a general-purpose computer.

      With regard to your personal attack and argument from adverse consequences, resorting to this sort of thing shows you have no real basis for your position.

      My Dad can exercise his rights under copyright law with his VCR. Not with his comcast DVR (CGMS). Certainly not with his HD recorder (HDCP). If he wants to hack around these restrictions, he must develop everything himself. Nobody can sell him equipment to circumvent an access-control technology (DMCA)--even for the purpose of exercising his rights under the law.

      Will you have the right to connect your general-purpose computer to the internet next year? Almost certainly.
      Will your ISP permit only connection of "trusted" or locked-down "appliance" type devices in the near future? Why would they do such a thing? Bandwidth costs money. Defending lawsuits costs money. So the answer is maybe. Depends on what you do about it.
      Consumer rejection killed DivX. TCPA has so far been a flop due to both political and technical reasons. Lack of interest made V-Chip largely irrelevant. Sony got egg on its face for their rootkit. BUT...
      DMCA, CGMS, HDCP and any number of draconian to the point of bizarre restrictions on games are right here in front of you today.

      RMS may successfully appeal to the crackpot geeks (one of which I am proud to call myself) on /. with The Right to Read, but this is preaching to the choir.

      So, again--
      It is important that the general public be aware of these sorts of shenanigans.
      And that they make their outrage known by walking away from the culprit vendors and speaking simply, directly, and clearly to other potential customers.

      Saying:
      That "app" you just paid $9.99 for in your iPhone--do you know that in any other environment--including your own laptop computer, you can have this and an almost infinite number of others like it for free? ...
      This accomplishes a whole lot more than saying "Well, as long as I can build a computer from parts there is no problem!"

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    4. Re:Welcome to trusted computing by cpghost · · Score: 1

      This sort of tech is certainly not going to be in my general-purpose computer any time soon, or ever, because I am simply never going to purchase a computer that doesn't allow me to customize it to my heart's content.

      If you can't buy non-DRMed computers in the future, how long do you think you could still use our current breed of open computers before they become hopelessly outdated and obsolete? 10 years? 15 years at most? And then? What would you do if all the market has to offer is vendor-locked stuff?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    5. Re:Welcome to trusted computing by Criton · · Score: 1

      It'll kill high end smart phones as no one will want to pay $400 for a phone that will become a brick if they switch carriers. Bull shit like that is why I never would buy an iPad and would rather buy the Taiwanese knock off MID because in this case the knockoff is a better product. I expect if this gets too wide spread it'll be the end of US electronics companies like Motorola as they get buried by Taiwanese and Chinese manufactures that don't pull that stuff. They don't make the stuff in the US anymore so it would not be a big loss by any means.

  77. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by mounthood · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frankly, I'd be interested in knowing how they rooted the phone and then changed the boot ROMs without using a USB cable...

    up up down down left right left right B A

    --
    tomorrow who's gonna fuss
  78. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    It will still run with an old (or even no) air filter, but it will end up totalled eventually if you operate it like that...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  79. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    And indeed there are people who make a lot of money repairing "bricked" devices for people, or buying "bricked" devices from people, fixing them and reselling them.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  80. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by PNutts · · Score: 1

    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles...

    The Jitterbug isn't the only phone out there.

  81. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Your response to the transmission problem was the smart choice. Industry standard is to replace the part, since rebuilding requires special tools and often a supply of organ donor transmissions. You swapped the unit as it was designed to be swapped,

    (I'm a mechanic, but if I need a rebuilt trans I buy one from a volume rebuilder except in the case of simple, ancient automatics.)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  82. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :brick: n.

                    1. A piece of equipment that has been programmed or configured into
                    a {hung}, {wedged},unusable state. Especially used to describe what
                    happens to devices like routers or PDAs that run from firmware when
                    the firmware image is damaged or its settings are somehow patched to
                    impossible values. This term usually implies irreversibility, but
                    equipment can sometimes be unbricked by performing a hard reset or
                    some other drastic operation. Sometimes verbed: "Yeah, I bricked the
                    router because I forgot about adding in the new access-list.".

                    2. An outboard power transformer of the kind associated with
                    laptops, modems, routers and other small computing appliances,
                    especially one of the modern type with cords on both ends, as
                    opposed to the older and obnoxious type that plug directly into wall
                    or barrier strip.

  83. Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Too late. I don't know if I'll ever need to root my phone, but I want to know that I can. I was considering the Droid X and the HTC EVO 4G, and eFuse was the leading reason for selecting the HTC phone.

    It's my phone, if I didn't want control, I would get an iPhone.

    1. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by jittles · · Score: 1

      I have the HTC Evo, rooted w/ a custom ROM and I can tell you its the way to go. The custom ROM I use has better performance, better stability, and longer battery life than the stock ROM. It's Fresh 1.0.1 if you're interested in giving it a try.

    2. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      IMO, you shouldn't have to do this to get a usable device. I fought Windows Mobile for years, and was hoping Android would be different.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      and paid microsoft a royalty.

      http://technorati.com/technology/android/article/htc-to-pay-microsoft-royalties-on/

      i have a htc hero. nice phone. but i'm not going to buy a htc if they are paying ms. just rubs me up the wrong way. not buying a motorola because of the efuse nonsense. google aren't staying in the market selling nexus either. so that leaves much smaller selection.

    4. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Usable device is a subjective term.

      HTC's Sense UI is a product differentiator as is the hardware. Like Apple or RIM or any other company, they slather their UI onto the hardware knowing that that's sufficient for many/most users to get what they want.

      When it's time to use things outside their box, it's root time.

      Android isn't mature. It's just not. I agree with you, root access should be easy to come by - but just as easy to avoid, few people running as root in Linux all of the time should be doing that. Until there's a sudo equivalent for Android, we'll face this problem.

      There are only two reasons to lock users out of an Android phone - 1) to keep the unwashed from creating service nightmares by uninstalling things in /system that didn't meet their unwashed scruntiny, and 2) to protect the phony baloney interests of bloatware.

      I rooted my Evo just to get rid of Qik, Sprint apps (except TV) and that freaking Amazon MP3 Store app that started to decide it owned my phone.

      In summary I agree with you with the proviso that more than just stock/root options are needed, in my opinion.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    5. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by Criton · · Score: 1

      Einstein once said only two things are infinite the universe and human stupidity and I'm not 100% sure on the former.

    6. Re:Ordered Sprint HTC EVO 4G on Friday by jittles · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't with Android itself, it's with the custom code that Motorola, HTC, Samsung, etc put on top of the OS. Typically its for UI customization or to provide features and functionality that the network provider requests.

  84. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How so? Apple doesn't brick your phone if you jailbreak it, and as far as I know, they've never gone after an individual legally over jail breaking their personal phone. The ability to put the phone in recovery mode and restore it to factory is pretty easy as well. If anything, this is more extreme, as the phone is supposed to be an open platform.

  85. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

    So what you're saying is the term has a meaning relative to the technical adeptness of the device's owner.

    I know a heck of a lot of brick owners, in that case. But I wouldn't want to change that. Tards who leave a nice PC out on the curb for me to scoop up and salvage need their ignorance coddled and encouraged.

  86. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I have a bricked Silicon Graphics 02 workstation. It 'just quit working' one day when I powered it on. Those things are just exotic enough and the docs are just obscure enough that I wasn't able to get it working. The cats like to sit on it, it's the right height to raise them up off the floor to the height they prefer.

  87. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1
  88. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    If you throw enough money at a thing you can revive even a dead hunk of clay.

    To be technical, you actually use a kiln to brick a dead hunk of clay.

    I suppose you could 'unbrick' it by pulverizing it fine enough and turning the brick back into clay. Although thinking about it, probably not. The 'bricking' process does some dramatic things to the structure of the clay.

  89. No problem by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    I,ll just put an ePenny in the fuse box.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:No problem by Criton · · Score: 1

      I wish it was that simple the efuse is such a scumtastic invention and it needs to be outlawed.

    2. Re:No problem by Alsee · · Score: 1

      ePenny? LOLZ
      It's called a BitCoin.
      And yes, I'll get off your lawn now grampa.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  90. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by LocalH · · Score: 1

    It is DRM because it also does this if the OS you install is unsigned - even if it would otherwise be fully functional running the software. The only OS you're allowed to run is the factory default one, or any officially updated one.

    --
    FC Closer
  91. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repairability doesn't always negate brickness. Having the company replace parts would seem to be the very definition of bricked. OTOH, pull a jumper and reboot to reset the BIOS? I think most of slashdot wouldn't call something that minor bricked, since it's fairly easy for the owner to do, no special tools or soldering or software or replacement needed. Once it starts going into special tools (like needing its own handheld widget with proprietary connector and software to diagnose and fix things), we're on the far side of the grey area.

  92. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer. This concept is alien to most users.

    My daughter (12) does it all the time to upload Java games, mp3s and videos, and occasionally to download photos to the PC. This "specialist tool" was included with the purchase, also with the manual, that tells you how to update the firmware using this.

  93. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't even able to find a USB cable for my (employer-supplied) G502 to buy.
    They exist in theory and that's where they seem to be stuck.
    Bluetooth or swapping the SD cards works well enough and who cares about "modding" such an outdated thing anyway though so who cares in the end.

  94. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do me a favor and send me all your bricked phones. I sense profit. Make sure you opt for the insurance...I don't want you to screw with my chance on making a killing off of your "bricked" phone.

  95. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great that Motorola has authorized specific software for this device. I wonder who they'll authorize me to call and when? It's so nice to have your freedom taken away, because later you get the marvelous treat of being 'authorized'.

  96. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by mysidia · · Score: 1

    I assure you that a bricked device does NOT meet that dictionary definition of brick and never does. Any metaphor can be taken too far.

    bricked means made similar to a brick by a software change, not physically made to match the classical dictionary definition of the word brick.

    If you can fix it easily without opening the device up, then it's not a brick.

    If you have to crack it open (disassemble it), and manipulate electronics physically or modify them, then that is an unbricking technique, but the device was still a brick before the unbricking.

  97. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I'd be interested in knowing how they rooted the phone and then changed the boot ROMs without using a USB cable...

    up up down down left right left right B A

    this isn't a palm pre and it doesn't have preware amd developer mode

  98. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    I had a bricked Thinkpad T21. It stopped running Windows, and the reinstall failed. However, FreeBSD installed fine, and ran for about 3 years.

    Then an update failed - with a message saying the PCI bus was doomed, or something similar. It sat in my server closet for about 2 years, and then I found an Ubuntu install disk on my desk, which had some diagnostics on. I ran the diagnostics, and they said it was fine. Ubuntu installed and I am still using it as a dumb terminal for LOM on my Sun Servers.

    Recently, I tried reinstalling Windows on it. It wont go. I have not retried FreeBSD.

    Obviously Windows is bricked, but the T21 and Ubuntu are not.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  99. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by mysidia · · Score: 1

    When in doubt consult the dictionary

    bricked - to be ridiculously drunk man i got so bricked last nite

  100. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago, I really fucked up a WRT54G when playing with software. I was going to throw it away, when I stumbled across a process for programming it using its JTAG interface and a parallel port. (Which worked fine.)

    Bricked means you can't make it work again without messing with the hardware. Clearly everything is always fixable if you open the box up. Worse case scenario, you get new parts (like a ROM chip from another box) and you solder them in. However, if there's absolutely any way you can make it work again without having to open the box up and start messing with the hardware, it was never bricked.

  101. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Bad+Ad · · Score: 1

    Because people were bricking their PSP's long before the pandora battery method was found.

  102. I know who is behind this by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1
    Clearly this is the work of Apple. On the heals of their worst product and following press release. Steve Jobs used his mind control over Motorola. End. Of. Story. Don't believe me? Just ask yourself "why now?". Jobs shouldn't even work at Apple, he was born in Kenya.

    Wait, am I getting my stories mixed up?

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  103. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by yuna49 · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the situation is today, but in the past this functionality was definitely not available to Verizon Wireless users. VZ disabled direct connections to the USB port so the only way to transfer pictures to and from the phone was via a data connection over its network or via an SD card if the phone has that capability. In general you had to email or text the photos to yourself and pay any consequent data charges.

    I'd venture to guess that it's still the case that most cellphone users never use their USB cables to transfer anything. They take pictures on their phones and use them as local wallpapers or hold them up so their friends can see them on the screen. The market for ringtones and sales of music tracks for phones is estimated to exceed $10B in the next few years. I have a technologically sophisticated teen-aged daughter who could move stuff to any from her phone over USB the same way she does with her Sansa player. Most of her friends wouldn't have the slightest idea how to accomplish any of that.

    I only buy unlocked phones to avoid these problems.

  104. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately your definition of "bricked" would loosen the definition to anyone who incorrectly installs software and needs technical assistance in fixing the install would have bricked the device. That means I bricked my first Linux install because I didn't compile it with all the necessary libraries.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  105. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    That's suposed to make the firmware CRC check fail, so it enters a mode where you can upload new firmware. It's way safer to use JTAG (many people have fucked up their routers by shorting pins). Besides, you can backup the CFE (some important part of the flash-thingy) and be sure you'll be able to fix a brick.

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  106. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea if in this safe mode it's easy to install the authorised software. If it is easy I wouldn't call that bricked either. I'd just call it nasty DRM that I'll steer well clear of.

    My definition of "easy": the instructions to recover functionality is in the user manual or on the product's support page on the company's website.

    CAPSHA: paralyze

  107. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Of course, because Motorola has spurned a complete community/scene of developers, I'm sure there is a market who is not going to authorize any Motorola purchases anytime soon.

    Since Motorola has no recent keyboard slider phones, there is no real advantage of their devices over HTC anymore.

    I'm just hoping Google makes a Nexus 2 that is usable with an "OEM unlock" command.

  108. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word you are looking for is PEBKAC.

  109. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by adolf · · Score: 1

    Feh.

    There is a very good transmission shop not far from my house where they keep and understand such special tools. It could've been rebuilt, and the rebuild would have carried a long warranty. But it would have been expensive (labor, mostly). That would've caused it to cease being a brick. I also looked at possibly buying a rebuilt unit, I just couldn't find anyone selling such a thing that I felt I could trust.

    But the whole experience made me very jaded about automatic transmissions in general. Accordingly, the fix that I actually implemented involved replacing the 4L30E with a used 5-speed Getrag that had about 80,000 fewer miles on it. Works good, is simpler, more fun, and will probably outlive the rest of the car. It's an easy swap on an E36 BMW, since they fit together like legos.

    The used tranny came with a parts car, too, so I've also got another engine, a nearly-complete set of fidgety electronic bits, and various other componentry.

  110. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coaster?

  111. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by DarkVader · · Score: 1

    In the US, federal law says otherwise.

    AFAIK, no phone manufacturer has ever gotten a FTC exemption from Magnuson-Moss.

    15 USC 2302(c)

    (c) Prohibition on conditions for written or implied warranty;
                waiver by Commission
                No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or
            implied warranty of such product on the consumer's using, in
            connection with such product, any article or service (other than
            article or service provided without charge under the terms of the
            warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name;
            except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the
            Commission if -
                    (1) the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted
                product will function properly only if the article or service so
                identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and
                    (2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public
                interest.
            The Commission shall identify in the Federal Register, and permit
            public comment on, all applications for waiver of the prohibition
            of this subsection, and shall publish in the Federal Register its
            disposition of any such application, including the reasons
            therefor.

  112. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by klui · · Score: 1

    Maybe so but I would bet if you did something to a piece of hardware that rendered it inoperable, you would probably post some message asking "I've managed to brick my xyz, does anyone know how to unbrick it?"

    I would say brick is an inoperable device that could potentially be unbricked.

    And if you really think about it, most hardware could be made to work again if you have the right tools--from BIOS recovery mode for PCs, JTAG interfaces, unsolder flash chips.

  113. Come on, Motorola... by jon42689 · · Score: 1

    And I was really stoked about Moto coming back in and showing some new tech to market... this is exactly why I'm once again choosing someone else. I want to do whatever I want with hardware once I've paid for it. Now, if I could get the phone for free, I might not bitch, but really, people are paying for phones that cost what you can buy a netbook for these days... If I bought a netbook and was told "You can't install anything on here except what it comes with" do you really think I'd drop 300 dollars on it?? I guess most people don't care, but it will be interesting to see if this bites Moto in the ass.

    1. Re:Come on, Motorola... by Criton · · Score: 1

      HTC will probably bury Moto's dead carcass as they have an android phone without the bullshit.

  114. But but but its android... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    How can they do this to us. its just as bad as Apple!!

    And for those slow among us, that was sarcasm. Remember Its a phone, they aren't supposed to be user modifiable devices so why are we surprised when they are restricted?

    Don't like it, buy a real computer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:But but but its android... by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Remember Its a phone, they aren't supposed to be user modifiable devices...

      According to what rule?

      And who laid that down?

      So - the entire class of apps is just wrong according to your theory: ringtones, volume modifiers, brightness modifiers, radio on/off controls, anything that changes the stock performance of contacts, calendars and call lists, on screen clock and weather widgets that replace or repair included widgets, soft keypad and dialer replacements, news aggregators, email client replacements, text-to-voice replacements, navigation replacements...

      We're all supposed to pay out the nose and drink from the trough like pigs because there's some rule that phones aren't SUPPOSED to be user-modifiable?

      Seriously - here's your new phone:

      http://www.tias.com/10782/PictPage/1923012113.html

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    2. Re:But but but its android... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      According to what rule? And who laid that down?

      Um, the contract that you agreed to that allows access to the carriers private data/voice network. Laid down by the same carrier that you are contracted with.

      These are not standalone devices, and have different risks to whom you have a contract with, thus different rules. Pretty simple concept if you get past the 'me me me' angle.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:But but but its android... by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Um, the contract that you agreed to that allows access to the carriers private data/voice network. Laid down by the same carrier that you are contracted with.

      And, in the United States, if your carrier happens to be Verizon or AT&T, they're subject to the same consent decree that broke up AT&T's monopoly 25 years ago & forced them to allow consumers to own their own phones. At first, it didn't matter much, because all phones were... well... phones. But within a couple of years, phones started to pick up new features, some of which had absolutely nothing to do with being a "phone", and other devices that were never conceived as phones began to acquire the ability to act like phones.

      > These are not standalone devices, and have different risks to whom you have a contract with, thus different rules.

      Newsflash: a hacked DOCSIS3.0 cable modem can cause WAY more service disruption than the most hacked Android phone to have ever existed on planet earth. Yet, by law, you can walk into Best Buy (or some other store) and buy your own anyway, whether Comcast likes it or not. Cable modems are literally radio transmitters (and fairly powerful ones, at that), and their broadcasts share cable with customers over a shockingly large area that makes the area served by a single cell tower look small by comparison.

      If the carriers want that much control and are that concerned about protecting the integrity of their networks, let them get together and define the specs for a mobile network interface that's basically a "black box" wireless network card having the approximate form factor of a thick SD card whose external connectors consist of power, RF, I2C, and ethernet. Then I can buy whatever pocket computer I like, stick their network interface into it, and then users and carriers can peacefully coexist on opposite sides of a well-defined wall of separation.

    4. Re:But but but its android... by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's great. I believe the apps I pointed out do not affect the carriers' backbone in any way.

      They affect my data usage however, by installing things that give me the latest NASCAR and NFL stats - whether I want that bloat or not.

      Me me me - it's my money.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  115. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hella can mean "really" or "a lot of". Examples:

    "Dude has HELLA good weed." - Indicating that "dude" has really good marijuana.
    "Dude has HELLA weed." - Indicating that "dude" has a lot of marijuana.
    "Dude has HELLA, HELLA good weed." - Indicating that "dude' has a lot of really good marijuana.

    You people from outside of Northern California never seem to get the usage right. It's like you heard it from some pop song that bit it from us.

  116. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I'd say your employer didn't want you having it..
    I got my cable with my(now retired) G502.
    So they certainly aren't stuck in theory.

  117. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Criton · · Score: 1

    Politicians know jack shit as those laws have done nothing but harm innovation and thus the economy.

  118. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Motorola Says eFuse Doesn't Brick Phones

    There, fixed that for you. Bricked is permanent. Non-permanent "bricking" isn't bricking at all. If you can revive it, it was never bricked in the first place.

    Who cares. I don't want a device that is effectively capable of committing automatic suicide if I don't use it in some approved manner. Screw that. I bought a G1 early, rooted it two days later, and have been running various third-party ROMS ever since (Cyanogenmod is still my current favorite.) Yes, there's a risk of "bricking" the device (not flashing the correct radio and SPL in the proper order, etc.) but that's a matter of my screwing up and having to JTAG myself back. I have it on good authority that I'll be getting a Nexus One on my birthday, so Motorola can just go screw themselves. Seriously, these things are not cell phones anymore, they're bloody damn pocket- sized computers and I'll run the operating system of my choice, thank you very much.

    Cell phone providers want to lock out third-party operating systems simply because they feel it will eliminate any revenue stream they get from proprietary apps and sales of ringtones and other useless cruft. Or course, they spin that by saying the need to prevent alternate platforms is because they want to "maintain the user experience" (read: keep users locked into the preprogrammed lameness) or to "help manage our network effectively to maintain proper service levels" or some such. Large helpings of BS at pretty much every level. Frankly, offering a true general-purpose computing system is not what they really want to do (because then they won't be able to nickle-and-dime us to death at every turn), what's unfortunate for them is that more and more people are demanding more power and more freedom. I will give T-Mobile credit for even selling a rootable device like the G1, and then working out a deal with Google for the N1, which can be rooted and is supplied carrier-unlocked anyway.

    Sorry, Motorola, you were the big cheese in the cellular world once, but it appears that you still don't get it, and are a bit too friendly with the big boys like AT&T and Verizon.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  119. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Criton · · Score: 1

    Technically a lot of the stuff companies have been pulling lately is way illegal but the congress and senate are not doing their job and instead are accepting payouts. Sony should have been made to issue a refund for every PS3 sold and MS should have only been able to ban chipped Xboxe 360s from XBL but could not disable the HD or media functions. If this hurts their profit margins then so be it that's how society is supposed to work you do wrong and screw people over you pay. Moto should have to fix every e-fused phone for no charge and customers should be able to send the phone back for a full refund if they are not happy with Motorola's and the carrier's terms.

  120. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by djdbass · · Score: 1

    My friends use the Rn system, where n = number of "really"s.
    Ex: I got R7 drunk last night. = I got really really really really really really really drunk last night.

    So then hella = (R2 || R3). Personally I would put it at R4, but I think I just lost brain cells typing this.

  121. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    You probably burned the voltage regulator chip. Perhaps a few resistors. Nothing major...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  122. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    > A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer.

    Er, no. I'll grant that a JTAG is a specialist tool, even if plenty of Slashdot's users own one.

    I'll even partly concede you might have a point if the device can be resuscitated using a DB25f connector, some wires, and access to a PC with a real parallel port (or a 2x13 IDC header on the mobo with the same signals, still quite common even on PCs without an actual parallel port on the back), just because getting *anything* that bitbangs a raw parallel port to work reliably under Windows is *harder* than rooting and reflashing most Android phones (thanks, Bill!).

    But a USB cable? No. Every Android phone I know of includes one in the box, and anybody who's reflashed his phone to a custom ROM (or trying to do so) is going to be quite intimately familiar with its use by the time he gets to any point where bricking his phone is a real possibility.

  123. Oh dear by itsphilip · · Score: 1

    God bless my Nexus One. This is actually WORSE than the iPhone. Motorola, you've lost a customer for life.

  124. A heritical view by moldor · · Score: 1

    While I can see Motorola's reason for "protecting the user experience" by doing this, what really scares me is that Apple could just as easily do this to future iPhones and iPads, also in the guise of "protecting the user experience". And, to be honest, I could see their reason for wanting to do so. The argument against this, which I have put to Apple before, is "What would be the backlash if you did this to your laptop range - made it impossible to install non-Apple approved software" - of course, the backlash would be the death-knell of the company. No-one in their right mind would purchase a laptop with those restrictions (and let's face it - hardware-wise Apple is a closed platform). Why do it with the iPhone and iPad then ?

  125. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by EETech1 · · Score: 1

    But if the bricking was caused by blowing a fuse designed to prevent unauthorized firmware from being run on the device, I'd bet the user has whatever cables are required to load the factory firmware also:) so Id have to say it was not bricked, just Defective By Design with DRM restrictions.

  126. doublespeak by Vastad · · Score: 1

    re-boot once approved software is re-installed.

    I don't like the use of this word "approved" anymore.

  127. Motorola also ---- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Motorola are also arseholes who make chips for landmines...

  128. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by yargnad · · Score: 0

    If you're defining by perception then I have a different definition. Bricking can be perceived as simply rendering a device inoperable. If the mod itself didn't cause the bricking, as in the mod is compatible with said device and would operate minus such DRM schemes, a function that renders the phone useless is just as bad as actually "bricking" it. To most people bricking means to render inoperable which eFuse does. I can "brick" my Palm by dropping from my balcony, but Palm can refurbish said phone so I guess it wouldn't really be "bricked".

  129. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

    Under this definition my girlfriend is bricked.

  130. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another term that has entered the popular lexicon and got warped. If a device is bricked, _no one_ can reactivate it - it is dead. If someone can revive the device for a fee, it's not bricked.... it's just something you probably should not have bought in the first place. Bricked means bricked - and I've had a few devices go that way on me because of mistakes.

    By your definition nothing is ever bricked. It's always possible to fix something if you want to spend enough money. The definition I always used was about what a device was worth. A bricked device is no more useful than a brick if it costs more money to fix than what it's worth. Pretty much like the term "totaled" for a car.

  131. But does 911 work by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    Brick or no brick does it always allow calling 911 as required by regulation.

    And when calling 911 does the GPS operate fully. I can tell ya that the cell tower triangulation stuff does not work quickly. Good thing that the bicycle guy I found splatted on a street who's name I spaced is OK.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  132. It is called a compromise by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

    "Google was busy greasing the wallets of the wireless providers while promising the moon to the tech crowd. This is the result. Shocking but true. The wireless providers are more interested in keeping control of their hardware platform then they are catering to the open source community."

    It really blows my mind that anyone could be so absurd as to keep pushing the illusion that Google is in charge (again it is the OHA, NOT Google), and then complain that they open sourced the code when nobody else has, and you complain that companies can add innovations without giving them away while still allowing you to shun them in favour of a custom build.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  133. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Riddle me this:

    snip....

    A USB cable is a specialist tool when it comes to mobiles, most users have never, and probably will never, connected their phone to their computer. This concept is alien to most users.

    ...snip...>

    How right you are. I was recently helping a friend migrate from one smart phone to another and to do so required a USB connection, and software then the software wanted to update itself (It was a fresh download) then the updated software DEMANDED that I update the phone before I could move to a step that permits the exporting of contact list, photos etc...

    The number of EULA was four, perhaps more. Four ELUA steps to extract a contact list! OMG! I have no idea if I signed the life of my first or second born child away or just a list of patents associated with my DNA.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  134. Re:Permanently brick sort of like permanently dead by adolf · · Score: 1

    Technically, it's not the job of congress or the senate to enforce laws.

    I'm just sayin'...