Slashdot Mirror


The Hell Known As Internet Screening Services

circletimessquare writes "Do you think your job is bad? Some websites outsource their moderation to firms where every work day, all work day, workers do nothing but sift through depravity after depravity. '"You have 20-year-old kids who get hired to do content review, and who get excited because they think they are going to see adult porn," said Hemanshu Nigam, the former chief security officer at MySpace. "They have no idea that some of the despicable and illegal images they will see can haunt them for the rest of their lives."' Some places only do year-long contracts, and have counseling services and staff psychologists, because of the psychological issues caused by this kind of work. One psychologist 'reached some unsettling conclusions in her interviews with content moderators. She said they were likely to become depressed or angry, have trouble forming relationships and suffer from decreased sexual appetites. Small percentages said they had reacted to unpleasant images by vomiting or crying. "The images interfere with their thinking processes. It messes up the way you react to your partner," Ms. Laperal said. "If you work with garbage, you will get dirty."'"

42 of 557 comments (clear)

  1. solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    hire via 4chan?

    1. Re:solution: by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's no good, they won't filter anything.

    2. Re:solution: by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The grain of truth is that there are plenty of people who can watch anything and laugh about it, while functioning just fine and having no emotional problems from doing so.

      Overly sensitive people shouldn't mess with shit that will damage them.

      Not everyone is sensitive, and not everyone has to "suppress" themselves to cope with seeing Bad Things.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:solution: by robnsara · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, they'll filter alright. Just the other way around.

      Actually, a better solution: Just upload EVERYTHING to /b/. If it gets reposted by anonymous, automatically add it to a filter list. That way you don't have to pay people to do the work. This reverse-filter idea is a good one!

    4. Re:solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The grain of truth is that there are plenty of people who can watch anything and laugh about it, while functioning just fine and having no emotional problems from doing so.

      Yes, they are called sociopaths, but they already have far deeper issues to deal with.

    5. Re:solution: by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is that most 20 year old kids don't really know how sensitive they are to things like this until they're repeatedly exposed to them, by which point much of the damage has already been done. Luckily for me, I was exposed to the Internet and all of the nastiness on it when I was only 13, and I've managed to get by with no ill effects at all except for the occasional extended blackout followed by a dead hooker in my bed. Some more sensitive people might really lose their minds, though.

    6. Re:solution: by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Yes, they are called sociopaths, but they already have far deeper issues to deal with."

      Being able to cope comfortably is only a pathology to those who fetishize sweet, delectable sensitivity. One can understand and see things which are unusual and outside social taboos without giving a shit. It's called perspective, as opposed to morbid emotional wallowing.

      In most cases, IMO, the term "sociopath" is used in society the way "troll" moderations are commonly used in Slashdot, which is to express Bitchy Disagreement.

      "I disagree with you, you a sociopathic troll!" brings to mind the Soviet practice of sending those who didn't agree with commie politics to asylums, because such wrong thought MUST be pathological.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:solution: by bit9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to think I was one of those people, until I saw a full length, uncut video of some terrorists beheading a captured American.

      I would advise anybody who thinks they're not one of those "overly sensitive" people to give it some serious thought before they decide to watch something like that, much less get a job doing it all day long. Some things you just cannot un-see - although you'll certainly wish you could.

    8. Re:solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think he was talking about Daniel Pearl, a journalist kidnapped and killed in Pakistan in 2002.

      And sorry, but the "real world" does not involve frequent beheadings. Being unable to see another human being brutally murdered without being disturbed isn't a result of living "sheltered".

      That's the vast majority of the world. Going by the numbers, lack of brutal decapitations is the norm. You talk down to people who can't stand such a sight, and think you somehow value life more?

      Yours was the most bizzare high-horse post I've ever read.

    9. Re:solution: by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean the Daniel Pearl video? That's why I have chosen to never watch it along with the fact that the people who created it want me to, and I do so love to disappoint them in any small way I can.

    10. Re:solution: by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking as a sociopath (which I am - I can cut off anything even vaguely resembling emotion at will)...I am capable of love, dedication, grief..., happiness, anger, the full spectrum of human emotion.

      I don't think "sociopath" means what you think it means.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    11. Re:solution: by severoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sociopaths lack the empathic response. People that respond negatively to disturbing videos are responding emotionally, though not necessarily empathically.

      There is obviously overlap, but that overlap can be trained away in many people. It is quite common, for instance, for surgeons to initially respond to use of a cautery gun by getting ill or faint (mostly because of the normally out-of-context smell of cooked meat that one knows is produced from a live human...the association is unsettling). But talk to any surgeon that's been doing the job for a long time, and that smell simply makes them hungry.

      Why shouldn't it make them hungry? Cooked meat, human or otherwise, is supposed to trigger that response. The hunger response is the mechanical reaction of a working human brain. Feelings of guilt at being hungry are, in the operating room, entirely misplaced; why should a surgeon feel guilty because of an automatic response when, in the offing, they are helping the patient? Much in the same way, these workers are ostensibly helping customers by protecting them from content they presumably don't want to see (though that is debatable).

      I know a doctor that once told me she gets great satisfaction from draining cysts. Despite the absolutely foul smell and gross result, she said it is absolutely one of the most satisfying activities she does as a doctor because it is a nearly risk-free procedure to a patient and the payoff is profound in that the patient immediately feels better. In that scenario, where you might think she's sick because she enjoys dealing with gross stuff, she sees herself as someone willing to endure something gross in particular because it does have such a great and positive effect; emotionally speaking, when viewed in the proper context (and it is the indisputably correct view), it is perhaps one of the most emotionally satisfying demonstrations of empathy I can think of.

      So it's mediation and mitigation of the guilt response that allows people like her to continue helping people, and if anything it makes them the opposite of a sociopath...likewise with any gruesome job—if one works in a slaughterhouse, a mortuary or morgue, crime scene cleanup, etc. So I tend to think that only people that are internally emotionally secure could do such a job. If your response is that it would take a sociopath, that is probably based primarily on fear about what you might discover about your own emotional stability in the same situation.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    12. Re:solution: by openfrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being able to cope comfortably is only a pathology to those who fetishize sweet, delectable sensitivity. One can understand and see things which are unusual and outside social taboos without giving a shit. It's called perspective, as opposed to morbid emotional wallowing.

      You yourself assume a superior, balanced attitude, while in fact you don't use argument but personal attack to defeat the opposite perspective. You come out as pretty aggressive in fact. And your 'big guy' pretension that you would not be affected by this shit is not backed by any actual knowledge or argument: you are just making it up... "all sissies..." I see you thinking and boasting.

      Do a bit of anthropology. We have evolved into a highly cooperative species through a very, very long process and our emotions, feelings of compassion, sense of ethics, etc. do define our individual characters and our common human culture. The grandparent does have a valid point when he suggest that someone unaffected could qualify as a sociopath. Your rationalizations don't even begin to convince me to the contrary.

    13. Re:solution: by bit9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think I saw the video you are talking about, the video of the Russian Neo Nazi's who beheaded those two jewish guys.

      No, that definitely wasn't it. I think it may have been Daniel Pearl, but the video I'm thinking of wasn't the highly-edited version with all the Arabic subtitles and what not. The one I saw was a full length unedited version with full audio, that started with the victim on his knees pleading for his life, and ended with his head being cut completely off and held in front of the camera. The camera never panned away, and there were no edits. It showed every scream, every tear, every cut and slice, etc. They guy was in complete and utter terror from the time they made the first cut, and the only thing that made the poor guy stop screaming was when they sliced through his trachea and he started making these horrific gurgling sounds. And quite unlike the guillotine executions you might have seen in old black & white movies, this was no quick and clean beheading - it took several minutes before he was finally dead.

      If you can watch that and be completely unaffected, well then congratulations - you're an asshole!

      I thought the video was brutal, cruel, but it has no serious affect because I knew people were brutal and cruel before I saw the video.

      People who are so sensitive that they cannot watch a person get beheaded, have psychological issues of their own to deal with because they have been sheltered from the real world.

      This moronic drivel doesn't deserve a response.

    14. Re:solution: by bit9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice double-standard you've got there. You label me as sheltered and overly sensitive because I didn't respond the way you did, and then you turn around and cry foul when I give you a label in return.

  2. 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So it's like getting paid to browse /b/?

  3. /.ers by TheMeuge · · Score: 4, Funny

    workers do nothing but sift through depravity after depravity

    I thought that was the definition of "browsing the Internet".

  4. yup. by ak_hepcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've done this as an Information Security person. Get a report, validate, pass it on to the cops and FBI.

    Not fun at all.

    Glad it's 10 years behind me.

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  5. Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is other people.

  6. Words of Wisdom: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    As the great Jello Biafra once said: "Want to see child porn? Join the vice squad."

  7. Re:Here's the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, come on. Rotten isn't actually bad.

    Rotten displays very candid pictures that you won't see in the mainstream media; things like terrible gunshot wounds, accidents, strange medical cases and so on. They're candid, and they're shocking, but they're not disturbing, at least once you've seen a couple and have gotten used to seeing things you don't usually see in our society.

    Disturbing is something else. Have you ever seen a video of a puppy getting tortured and killed slowly, for instance? Even if you can't actually see much, it's horrifying. In fact, it's horrifying precisely WHEN you can't see anything, because between the frenzied howls of pain and anguish, your mind fills in the blanks of what must be happening, and you're powerless - absolutely powerless! - to stop the whole thing. You don't know who's doing it, you don't know where they are, you don't know anything. The only thing you know is that the moment you're watching it, the puppy already HAS died a horrible, painful, slow death, and even if they catch the guy who did it, the events in the video can't be undone or prevented anymore.

    THAT is disturbing.

    It's something that happens for police officers, too, BTW; those who're working on serial killer/rape/... cases will often need psychologica help after reviewing photographs and videos and so on.

    And these are trained professionals who're only doing it *sometimes*, as part of their job, and they're officers who've already seen a lot, who're older and have already got more life experience and so on.

    Can you imagine being a 20-year old who's doing NOTHING ELSE but review things like that, eight hours a day, five days a week, for an entire year or more?

    It's gonna mess you up something bad. And rotten? Rotten doesn't even begin to compare to it. Rotten is harmless.

  8. I notice with interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I notice with interest the posters of "can it really be that bad?" type of comments.

    It can.

    I spent some years handling abuse@ for a national-sized ISP that allowed "homepages" via dialin. Let's just say that I had severe temper-issues for a long while after that.

    1. Re:I notice with interest by wurp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because he didn't know the depths of depravity he would see before taking it, and after he had it he felt pressured by "macho" assholes not to "whuss out" by proving he's a human with human reactions?

  9. Re:Goatse Posters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without reading your comment, I got the impression from your subject that you were selling something. Now that, I thought, is truly depraved.

  10. Dirty Jobs episode? by BigDXLT · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see Mike spend a day cleaning up the interwebs!

  11. Re:Goatse Posters by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hope all you bastards are happy. First time I saw that image, I had nightmares for a month.

    And how frequently do you click on random URLs from people you don't know now that you've had that experience?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  12. Plenty of evil out there... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being forced to look at kiddie porn as part of your job could really mess you up. Looking at pictures of gory violence, torture, and abuse of all kinds, all day, day after day... I'd say that would mess somebody up far more than occasional crap coming up during web browsing.

  13. Re:Here's the thing by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Say what you will about rotten.com needing to go away, I think it needs to stick around, I think depicting the finality of death and how grotesque it really is may cause some children to make better choices, "maybe playing with dad's gun is a bad idea", "maybe jumping onto moving trains is a bad idea". Everyone in the world dies, Americans just seem to be the only country that likes to shelter their kids from death.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  14. Cause and effect? by MSBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if we turn this around and consider that maybe those who apply for jobs to screen the internet already have an unhealthy fascination with weird and/or illegal content? Maybe the post-contract counseling only reveals all the issues they harbored prior to starting the work?

    I'm not saying this is the case, but it's a possibility...

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  15. Incongruity by macemoneta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem for many people is the incongruity between how they were raised and reality. People are generally raised to believe that people are good, that there are norms of behavior, there is justice in the world, authority figures can be trusted, things happen for reason and are overseen by an omnipotent deity. As we grow up, we learn that these are simply convenient lies that define our society.

    When presented with conflicting visual evidence, we can be shocked and damaged - our world view is broken. Some go into denial (classifying the content as depravity), and some go into depression (recognizing that society is simply a veneer). Education and experience over time tends to break these falsehoods more gently, incrementally. The Internet is not so gentle.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    1. Re:Incongruity by c0d3g33k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem for many people is the incongruity between how they were raised and reality.

      People are generally raised to believe that people are good, that there are norms of behavior

      Most people are good, most of the time. I wasn't raised that way, I've observed this to be the case.

      there is justice in the world

      There is, most of the time. The existence of exceptions doesn't negate the rule, and certainly doesn't justify giving up.

      authority figures can be trusted

      This is a tough one. Many authority figures can be trusted, but not unconditionally. Any authority figure should be open to question and monitored closely. The problem isn't that someone with authority can't be trusted most of the time, it's what happens when they stray and the trust is misplaced. Even if rare, the ramifications are great.

      things happen for reason

      Generally true. You may not like the reason, but cause and effect seems to affect most things that happen, in my experience.

      [Things] are overseen by an omnipotent deity

      Nope. I have no evidence of that. I'll grant you this point.

      As we grow up, we learn that these are simply convenient lies that define our society.

      They aren't convenient lies. Believing in good, justice, trust and reason are things to be aspired to, because if you don't, you have given in to evil, injustice, distrust and unreason. The existence of the latter does not necessarily make the former "lies".

  16. Dumbasses by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These are probably the same guys who, in high school, thought it would kick ass to be a Gynecologist. It never seemed to enter their heads that if a woman is paying them to check out her vagina, chances are... it's because of something a typical man would never want to see...

  17. Re:Pussies by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, i've seen my share of ugly shit in the net. I do think that i've seen most of the worse it has to offer. I mean REALLY? Are there people out there that will get all fucked up because of goatse?

    I think it's safe to say that if you think Goatse is even close to the bad things on the internet*, or that you think that the worst stuff you've seen wouldn't mess someone up, than you have not at all seen the worst the internet has to offer.

    The world is MUCH uglier than what any publication shows. ANY.

    *On a scale of -10 to 10 (0 being neutral, 10 being awesome and -10 being disturbing) Goatse Ranks a -2. You don't even breach -5 until you see the involuntary stuff. Where people are tied up and forced into terrible acts of sexual abuse and mutilation. Then you see the same thing happen to children. A man's anus pales in comparison.

  18. Hmmm..... by NetNed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "She said they were likely to become depressed or angry, have trouble forming relationships and suffer from decreased sexual appetites."

    So it has similar effects as playing world of warcraft?

  19. Re:Here's the thing by butterflysrage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there needs to be a +5 horrifying

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  20. Re:Here's the thing by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was about to post how I can't imaging anything so gross or horrible I haven't already seen on the Internet and how it wouldn't bother me.
    Thanks for fixing that.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  21. Police photograph archives by kriston · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of my colleagues' former jobs was to index the photograph archives of an international police organization. He spoke about some unspeakable crime scene photos that he took years to get over. The mere descriptions of the photos also took *us* years to get over.

    This kind of thing is not good for anyone.

    --

    Kriston

  22. Re:Pussies by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Often times you can just tell. Once you see enough BSDM, you can tell when people are role playing. Especially when its in some room painted all black, and the people come out unmasked, and all those little nuances. When its comes from some tripod across the room in some empty warehouse, the guys wear ski masks to protect their identity and are viciously brutal beyond the point of "just enough to hurt but not leave marks". No one in role playing ever wants a real black eye.

    Either way - faked or not - it doesn't really matter. If its convincing enough to seem like real abuse, it's disturbing.

    You'll notice more and more BSDM sites are putting the disclaimer at the beginning or end of their videos with both parties saying on camera they consent to the activities.

    I mean, not that I would know anything about that.

  23. Meh by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pics or it didn't happe — OH JESUS MY EYES!

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  24. Re:Goatse Posters by Zerth · · Score: 5, Funny

    3 guys 1 hammer.
    1 girl 1 kitten.

    Links?

    You're hired

  25. Re:Here's the thing by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd disagree. Violence is much more acceptable in the US than nudity and there is something wrong with a child that needs to see a head being sawed off to realise people die and violence is bad.

  26. Re:Pussies by Manfre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes. Soldiers return home suffering from many psychological disorders, including PTSD, due to the horrible things they see and experience while deployed.