Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Pirate Party Launches ISP

WillDraven writes "Torrentfreak is reporting that the Swedish Pirate Party has launched an ISP. Starting with 100 residents in a housing organization in the city of Lund, Pirate ISP hopes to gain 5% of the market in Lund before spreading to other markets. Headed by longtime Pirate Party member Gustav Nipe (video interview in English), the company aims to provide Internet service with the sort of guarantees one would expect from the Pirate Party. Most notable are the promises to keep no logs of subscriber activity and thus to provide no data to law enforcement or private corporations."

74 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Please spread to other countries... by Shikaku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Please spread to other countries...

    1. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 2, Informative

      it really doesn't matter that a retail ISP doesn't keep logs... their upstream providers already have all their traffic mirrored and monitored by the NSA.

    2. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well it depends on you for a big part : http://www.pp-international.net/
      Sweden has exceptional political conditions. Germany is coming up to speed. But tentative national pirate parties exist in many countries.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Spectre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "for the purpose of illegal activities"

      Why would you assume this?

      Believe it or not, there are people in this world who are just as law-abiding as you may be, but who don't want our every action cataloged by those in government.

      There is no reason that anybody needs to know where I am, when I'm asleep, or when I poop, despite what the people pushing for National Healthcare might think (when you poop could be important, if you're constipated it'll cost us all more money to pay for your healthcare).

      "for the purpose of privacy"

      IS NOT

      "for the purpose of illegal activity"

      No matter what those in power would rather you believe.

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    4. Re:Please spread to other countries... by sconeu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that with no logs, it's impossible to match an IP to a MAC
      (and yes, I know MACs can be spoofed)

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Please spread to other countries... by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt they care about the small chance that someone who's not the subscriber may have performed the crime. But yeah, maybe.

      The logs they are speaking of is rather who customer got which IP lease for which date and time.

      Without those it's just an IP with no-one to charge. With them they got a real person.

    6. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The logs they are speaking of is rather who customer got which IP lease for which date and time. Without those it's just an IP with no-one to charge. With them they got a real person.

      until that IP address is witnessed logging in to a facebook account or checking an email address or the 1000s of other ways traffic can be analyzed to pair requests up with real people.

    7. Re:Please spread to other countries... by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, because content providers will start asking Facebook who have used Facebook from this and that IP around this and that time?

      Or they will sniff the traffic of all networks within Sweden?

      We already have laws protecting personal data, how you can use and even store it. Forcing ISPs to provide the data is an exception, not the other way around.

      http://www.datainspektionen.se/
      http://www.datainspektionen.se/in-english/

      The Data Inspection Board is a public authority. Our task is to protect the individual's privacy in the information society without unnecessarily preventing or complicating the use of new technology.

      What on earth does the Data Inspection board does? (PDF):
      http://www.datainspektionen.se/Documents/datainspektionen-presentation-eng.pdf

      http://www.datainspektionen.se/lagar-och-regler/personuppgiftslagen/
      http://www.datainspektionen.se/in-english/legislation/the-personal-data-act/

      On the 24th of October 1998 the Personal Data Act (1998:204) came into force and replaced the out-dated Swedish Data Act from 1973. The Personal Data Act is based on Directive 95/46/EC which aims to prevent the violation of personal integrity in the processing of personal data.

    8. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 2, Informative
      i was never worried about either... so... there.

      i am, however, worried about people that tell other people to be worried.

      the simple truth: no transaction over the internet is not vulnerable to inspection by government agencies.

    9. Re:Please spread to other countries... by bjourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God damn. Get off your chair, get the thumb out of your ass and start your own party you lazy fatso. The revolution won't happen all by itself you know.

    10. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Recovery1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, I would buy a used car from one of them before I bought one from a politician. Well, maybe a used boat. Seeing that they're pirates and all.

    11. Re:Please spread to other countries... by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Defending the legalization of private sharing is legitimate (as any other speech, as in Free Speech), and it's their main platform. They don't need to "cover it" using other stuff - they call themselves the "Pirate Party", for crying out loud, do you really think they're trying to hide their motives?

      Privacy is just another of their position, it's not a cover up for anything, because they obviously aren't trying to cover up their main motive.

    12. Re:Please spread to other countries... by sh3p · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Pirate Party of Canada is eligible for Official status (they've filled out all the paperwork and have been approved by Elections Canada). They just internally elected their first candidates last night, in fact. http://www.pirateparty.ca/

    13. Re:Please spread to other countries... by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, someone that pushed for legalization of alcohol during Prohibition was illegitimate in their goals and reasons because alcohol use was against the law and anyone wanting to change that has to be evil?

    14. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      THERE IS NO BIG BROTHER. THERE IS NO LITTLE BROTHER. there is government. there is government that respects privacy and there is government that does not respect privacy. discuss facts. discuss the truth. don't anthropomorphize fascism and invasion of privacy by the government as inevitable as the invasion of privacy i would expect to grant to a member of my family.

    15. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt the FRA will answer any requests....

      the issue isn't "will they?", it's "can they?" and "should they?". if the answers are respectively YES, NO, then why aren't they NO, NO.

    16. Re:Please spread to other countries... by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to forgive the GP. He/she is a product of the Western school systems and media which are more interested in producing obedient consumers than citizens.

      Obedience to the authorities and blind belief in the law are all hammered into people from the tenderest of ages and constantly reinforced by the media (consider how many TV series are about the "hero-like-cops enforcing the law" vs "hero-like-rebels challenging the law").

      Some of us, when we get to adulthood become aware of how dirty and corrupt the process of making laws is and how many laws out there serve purposes which are in fact "prop-up the business model of my buddies" and against the best interests of society.

      Some of the great heroes of our times (like Ghandi) actually broke the law again and again and in fact, in his time, grand figures of the US history like Washington and his co-revolutionaries where busy breaking the laws of the crown.

      Blindly following unfair laws is the way of the Sheep, not of Man.

    17. Re:Please spread to other countries... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what if one thinks (as I do) that noncommercial copying and distribution of data should be legal? I should just STFU? Sorry, but I won't. I won't STFU about wanting drugs, prostitution, and gambling legalized, either. Noncommercial copying and distribution doesn't harm anyone, and study after study has show this.

      As to drugs, prostitution, and gambling, how I piss my money away is none of anybody's business but my own.

  2. I predict... by f3rret · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That The **AA's are just going to love this idea.

    I suspect that they'll just set up bulk mailers to send DMCA notices to this ISP's abuse@ address, every time a new movie, album or anything is released a mail gets sent to abuse@pirateisp.com because no doubt a copy of said work is bound to exist somewhere on their network.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    1. Re:I predict... by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      and I bet the Pirate Party and the network engineers and system administrators that they hire will be at least smart enough to straight filter, either at the packet level at the border, or application level on the mail servers, any traffic coming from IP ranges known to belong to the RIAA, MPAA, or constituent organizations. That's what I'd do. Or segment abuse@ off on its own area, let it take the hammering, and spit all the addresses back via feedback loops and get their email black listed. Or... run the mail server on OpenBSD, where spamd is linked to pf, and accept the incoming connections from their mass-mailer at 1bps, thus backlogging the sender and screwing them over (disk i/o issues, etc). Fun stuff like that.

    2. Re:I predict... by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as a system administrator at a web hosting company who had to monitor abuse@ and all the crap that was associated with that... yes. yes i have.

    3. Re:I predict... by Zedrick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then this ISP can set up an autoreply that gets triggered by "DMCA" in the body, informing the sender that the DMCA is an american law and totally irrelevant in most other countries. (though writing such replies manually can be a lot of fun, I did plenty of that when I worked as abuse-handler at a large webhost in Denmark. A lot of American lawyer-types really can't get it into their thick skulls that american laws are not universal, and if they have a valid complaint they need to say so (and be specific!) instead of just waving around a wand, trying to invoke the magical DMCA.)

    4. Re:I predict... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, because the ** Association of America will send DMCA (an American law) notices to a Swedish ISP. You know what the Pirate Bay does with those letters now? They post them up on a page and laugh at them.

    5. Re:I predict... by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      any traffic coming from IP ranges known to belong to the RIAA, MPAA, or constituent organizations.

      IMHO, that would be doing exactly what their enemies are doing. Their purpose is to let users access the internet without restrictions. Not to wall-off those things they find evil.

    6. Re:I predict... by f3rret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but that does not really stop the **AA's does it?

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    7. Re:I predict... by Andorin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You left out the "on the mail servers" part of his post. Meaning that the filtering is done for incoming email to the ISP itself, not traffic in general.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    8. Re:I predict... by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative
    9. Re:I predict... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Informative
  3. Which is awesome until... by easterberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... people start using it for child pornography transfer and other things that SHOULD be illegal.

    1. Re:Which is awesome until... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But isn't it better to trust people with freedom than to treat everyone like criminals?

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Which is awesome until... by stagg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And? People use highways for illegal things. They use their homes for illegal things. Hell, they probably use government buildings for illegal things. Cracking down on freedoms in the name of a minority of miscreants is never a good thing.

    3. Re:Which is awesome until... by endymion.nz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno.. they might do something I have a moral objection too, not necessarily a criminal act. :(

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    4. Re:Which is awesome until... by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... people start using it for child pornography transfer and other things that SHOULD be illegal.

      This is precisely why these things shouldn't be illegal. At least, possession and transfer of information (including child pornography) shouldn't be illegal. (Of course, abusing children to make child pornography should be illegal, and child pornography itself could very well be evidence of a crime.) The problem is, as soon as you make certain kinds of information illegal, then it would be impossible for ISPs to provide the kind of anonymity many of us would desire. Child pornography makes a wonderful excuse to impose strict data retention laws that affect a wide variety of users.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    5. Re:Which is awesome until... by easterberry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure the cops patrol and watch the highways and, with a warrant, can go into your home if there are reports of crimes there.

      Are you implying it would be better if they couldn't/didn't?

    6. Re:Which is awesome until... by Andorin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      um... no. Not in cases of major crimes it isn't.

      Downloading child pornography is a major crime?

      Innocent people need to be watched by the police so that guilty people can't go free.

      It's better to let a guilty man go free than convict an innocent.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    7. Re:Which is awesome until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be funny but that's just fucking scary.

    8. Re:Which is awesome until... by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a false dichotomy. You can be allowed freedom to speak while still being able to be found when you use that freedom to engage in criminal activities or to organize acts of terrorist destruction.

    9. Re:Which is awesome until... by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you can be found and punished for that then you can be found and punished when you want to speak out against your government, when you want to say unpopular things, support unpopular positions or organize acts of civil protest.

    10. Re:Which is awesome until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to make analogies, do it right. There is no "just in case" recording of everything I do in my home so that cops can get a warrant and watch what I did. Even for "live" investigations, there's a high legal barrier before a cop can enter my home. If someone just accuses me of stealing something, it is not sufficient for a warrant. On the internet, with most ISPs, not only is there a record which ties my online activities to my identity, there's also almost no barrier if someone wants to access that information.

    11. Re:Which is awesome until... by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      logging every site that every user visits through an ISP just in case law enforcement want to check up on it later to see if they're viewing illegal material is like putting a camera in every bedroom just in case law enforcement want to check up on it later to see if you've been raping victims in the room.

      an equivalent to a warrant to search your house would be a warrant to search your computer not having your ISP recording everything you view for future inspection.

    12. Re:Which is awesome until... by easterberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be fine. But the article seems to suggest they won't and if they try they'll sue.

    13. Re:Which is awesome until... by Target+Drone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Downloading child pornography is a major crime?

      I think that'll be small potatoes compared to the fact that every black hat, spammer, script kiddie, phisherman, fraudster, terrorist, and mobster can safely do whatevery they want and not have to worry about it. If this ISP manages to grow to any decent size I'd expect it would turn into the pariah of the Internet with admins everywhere blocking the IPs becuase they don't want to put up with all the crap that hit's their servers.

    14. Re:Which is awesome until... by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, piracy should be illegal too. Do you think you shouldn't have to pay content creators? How does that work logically? Are you just entitled to their stuff for free or something?

    15. Re:Which is awesome until... by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in that situation I'd agree with you and I'd have a hard time seeing how they'd be able to refuse to keep records in the case of an official warrant asking them to keep logs on one of their customers.

      What I oppose is the kind of general fishing expeditions that law enforcement seem to love- log every users actions then hand over anything and everything after a polite email from the police(without a warrent) so the police can snoop through the private lives of innocent people in the hope of finding a crime.

    16. Re:Which is awesome until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Child pornography is a red herring, a talking point cynically trotted out by politicians and duly repeated ad nauseam by the unthinking masses. I've seen nothing to suggest that its prevalence is any more than anecdotal, yet it is repeatedly used as an excuse to promulgate laws that shape the future of our society. It's our time's Emmanuel Goldstein and The Brotherhood.

    17. Re:Which is awesome until... by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not going to make assumptions about how long you've been on the internet and what not, but in case you weren't here in the early days, an open and free network is what it was. The sad fact is is that there are enough people who abused the system such that what you have today is the end result.

    18. Re:Which is awesome until... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you think you shouldn't have to pay content creators?

      When you get right down to it, yes. I think that. It should be optional at most; works of art that exist as purely commercial exercises will disappear. I'm ok with that. As for other types of imaginary property that don't fall under the term "art" (like patents for physical devices and computer programs) there are better ways to deal with the regulation of who gets to sell them than making ideas (information) illegal - something that should be avoided at all costs, regardless of consequences. Programmers can sell their labor instead of the finished product, and a reasonable and short (10-15 years) government granted monopoly can protect a person or company's investment into developing some product. Software patents however, should not in any form be allowed.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    19. Re:Which is awesome until... by Totenglocke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that'll be small potatoes compared to the fact that every black hat, spammer, script kiddie, phisherman, fraudster, terrorist, and mobster can safely do whatevery they want and not have to worry about it.

      You know what? I say good. Just like how the government needs a warrant to tap your phone, it's absurd to think it's ok for them to monitor everything everyone does on the internet. The government has no authority to stop people from having private conversations in person or on the phone, the internet shouldn't be any different.

      This is just like how each time a new form of media comes out, the MPAA / RIAA try to sue for using it for "piracy" - just because the internet is a "new" form of communication, they want to ignore laws against spying on people.

      Freedom doesn't just apply when you want it to apply.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:Which is awesome until... by Revotron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Threaten to kill the president

      ECHELON is now on your tail. Good luck! :)

    21. Re:Which is awesome until... by bill_kress · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem that you seem to be missing is that morals are subjective. Your morals may not apply to me. For instance, if I feel it is morally wrong for you to discuss football because I feel that football and it's "Us vs them" mentality has destroyed American politics, do I have the right to find you and stop you (or punish you) for violating my morals?

      The fact that everyone doesn't automatically recognize this fact instantly is what scares the GP (and me).

      In fact, I'm reluctant to hit submit because it's hard to believe it's not a troll, but it was written with a sincere sounding naivety so I'll give it a go :)

    22. Re:Which is awesome until... by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now imagine there is a security vulnerability allowing the interception of such a communication. Accordingly, those responsible might patch that vulnerability, but you, as the user, are negligent and fail to install that patch. If that intercepted communication is subsequently used to prosecute you, it is partly your fault.

      p.No, it's not. It's called "inadmissible evidence". Just like how the police can't use a phone call against you in court without a legal warrant to listen to your calls, they should be required under the same anti-wiretapping laws to have a warrant to monitor your internet activity. The only reason that this isn't the norm (applying wiretapping laws to the internet) is because corrupt government officials realize that it's their chance to get away from the restrictions of wiretapping laws.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    23. Re:Which is awesome until... by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about when someone posts online that they plan to go shoot up their school the next day?

      The person who first uttered the threat is committing a crime, just as is the person who created the child pornography, if real children are abused. Are you suggesting it should be illegal to possess a copy of a threat that someone else made?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    24. Re:Which is awesome until... by Andorin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, yes. All the problems of the Internet were brought upon us because people misbehaved, and had nothing to do with corporate lockdown, monopolization and commercialization.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    25. Re:Which is awesome until... by VanessaE · · Score: 2, Informative
      If it's been long enough since the content in question was first made, abso-fucking-lutely we're entitled to it.

      After 10 or 15 years, all copyrighted material, whatever its origin, should be free to copy, download, etc. Keep and protect your oh-so-precious trademarks if you want, and let the credit remain with the creators of the content, but let the content itself fall into the public domain like it is supposed to.

      Surely you remember the concept of copyrights that eventually expire? Oh the horror - the sheer nerve of people to demand that which is rightfully theirs!

    26. Re:Which is awesome until... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A better analogy -- some people object to alcohol, while beer is one of my favorite pleasures. I say if you don't like alcohol, don't drink it. But that didn't stop people from getting a Constitutional amendment making it illegal (and turning my grandfather into an underground criminal, since he had a beer making kit in his barn).

      But I think you misunderstood the GP. He asked "what is wrong with having morals?" and the answer is nothing, until you try to make others follow YOUR morals. And he's right that there is no correlation betweeen moral and legal; there's nothing immoral about smoking pot, but most people would consider adultery to be immoral, even though it's perfectly legal in Illinois and most other places.

  4. Kind of Sad... by ceraphis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that a special ISP has to be launched to get the type of protections every ISP should have.

    1. Re:Kind of Sad... by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole argument that "only criminals require privacy" is really getting tired.

      They offer privacy and anonymity (as the latter can't exist without the former), and there's nothing wrong with aspiring for the two.

      People breaking the law, while unfortunate and wrong, is a lesser evil - a necessary sacrifice for a greater good.

  5. Re:IBTL by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how would you feel if i was able to call up and get your IP from this post - then call your ISP and get your address, along with usage logs so i can approximate when you will be home.

    then i'll just go sit on your door step and say hi and talk to your neighbors that i'm just watching you for suspicious activity because you where online talking about keywords "child pornography & terrorism"

    now - does it make a difference if i'm wearing a uniform or not?

    what if i was a politician and you happened to say something negative about my campaign?

    the point is - that we need an avenue for free speech - we need an avenue to be able to anonymous. do people abuse that? yes they do - should we penalize all of society to a nanny/police state for the few? NO..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  6. Limits? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2

    How much will it be per month? How much can I transfer per month? Is there a time when downloading is unlimited (such as weekends or between 10pm and 8am). Will they throttle the line during peak hours? What speed can I expect?

    Logging my BT transfers is the least of my concerns when choosing an ISP.

    1. Re:Limits? by Zironic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Swedish ISP's as a rule don't have limits and tend to cost something along the line of $10 to $40 depending on bandwidth and extra services.

    2. Re:Limits? by smallfries · · Score: 2, Informative

      We currently pay about 300kr a month for a 30Mb connection. I think that's about 30euro / 25pounds / $40. We don't get throttled and there are no limits as far as I know. BT tends to max out at 3MB/s on popular torrents, lower than that if the swarm isn't big enough to saturate the line.

      There are cheaper packages available, and our ISP goes up to 100Mb/s symmetric.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  7. Re:IBTL by Spectre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "... this age of terrorism and child pornography ..."

    What the hell? You think this age is "different" some how?

    Terrorism is certainly not rampant. Look back a few decades, to say, the fifties or the sixties when there were riots all over the USA.

    Child Pornography, hell. Look back a century, "children" were getting married to middle-aged men and having their babies. The only difference is, back then nobody arrested you for it, or even thought twice about it.

    "This age" is noted only for everybody being declared a criminal and living in fear that their government is going to lock them up if they happen to say something ... like, say, this post on SlashDot RIGHT HERE.

    --
    "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
  8. how do I get there from here? by slick7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would that be Pirate_Party.arg?

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  9. Reason for server logs by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's going to be fun for the admins when the server falls over and they need to figure out why. /var/log is there for a reason.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:Reason for server logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It shouldn't be hard to figure out why your server fell over.
      I mean with the shuriken on the side and the "YAKUZA WUZ HERE" spray painted on it should be a trivial matter to locate and keelhaul those responsible.

  10. Re:IBTL by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the health and physical well-being of my family and neighborhood

    Let me put you and your family in a prison I design and I'd be almost certain that your health and physical well-being will be ensured. I'm not sure you'd enjoy it much, though.

    --
    That is all.
  11. Re:IBTL by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would assume via normal police investigation. You know the kind of stuff you would not need a warrant for.

    You can wiretap other wire than just the phone lines, dummy. With a warrent, no need to be logging everything before.

    I guess we should come to expect this level of cowardice from english folks.

  12. Re:IBTL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in this age of terrorism and child pornography

    You say that as though terrorism was something even slightly new (it isn't, and has been going on for centuries, if not millennia), and as though child pornography is anything more than child abuse (which isn't even limited to our species it goes so far back) with a camera.

    Should we go after Kodak for making child porn possible, or after Polaroid for making it easy to anonymise?

  13. Illegal activities need not stay illegal forever by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure nothing bad could ever happen from a group calling itself the "Pirate Party" taking money to provide internet services for the purpose of illegal activities.

    Look past the "Pirate" and see the "Party". Should the Pirate Party get elected to a national legislature within the next decade or so, watch illegal activities become legal.

  14. Idiots! by zmollusc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The stupid pirate party and the stupid Swedish government have just handed a huge propaganda victory to the RIAA. Within a week the entire swedish economy will have ground to a halt and terrorists will be overrunning sweden and building WMDs! Then the RIAA will say "We told you so! Look what happens when ordinary people are allowed freedom!"

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  15. Re:IBTL by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Child Pornography, hell. Look back a century, "children" were getting married to middle-aged men and having their babies. The only difference is, back then nobody arrested you for it, or even thought twice about it.

    I know, that always kills me. People try to say that they're "kids", yet not that long ago they would be married at that age. Hell, people try to talk down on teenagers and say that they're stupid and such, but it's only because society changed to make them less responsible. 100 years ago many of those high schoolers would have had a job and a family already. That's how things were for thousands of years, then all of the sudden society goes batshit crazy and decides that anyone under 30 is incompetent and needs the government to tell them what they can and cannot do.

    I'm all for punishing people who intentionally harm others. However, I'm not for having blanket rules because a few old people who had crappy lives decide that they know better than everyone else.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  16. Re:IBTL by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that much, actually. The apprentice system tended to keep teens under their master's thumbs.

  17. Re:Illegal activities need not stay illegal foreve by icebraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They don't need to get elected, they just need to get sufficient recognition. In a truly diverse parliament (read: not the US), a party with 10% has enough influence to make other parties take them seriously.

    In fact, it has already happened in Finland: remember that story on how the government asked the PP's opinion on the change on the wifi law?

  18. Re:IBTL by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And really, in this age of terrorism and child pornography is it even a good idea to have an anonymous isp?

    Yes, in this age of very real abuse of our rights in freedoms for the sake of fighting largely imaginary and/or irrelevant threats such as terrrorism and child pornography, it is an extremely good idea to have an anonymous ISP.

    Oh yes, the promise to pay for a one-way ticket to North Korea applies to you as well, and I'm dead serious here: you get your Big Brother wet dream come true (with minor inconveniences such as a mostly-grass diet, but it's a small price for safety, isn't it?), and we get one less person who is eager to vote away his and others' freedoms that make up the cornerstone of the modern Western society.