Slashdot Mirror


India's $35 Tablet Computer

NotBornYesterday was one of many readers sending in news that the Indian government has announced it is helping to develop a $35 tablet computer running Linux. "India has unveiled the prototype of a $35 basic touchscreen tablet aimed at students, which it hopes to bring into production by 2011. The government plans to subsidize the tablets so the cost to students could be $20; and eventually, they hope the cost will fall to $10 per unit. India's human resource development minister, Kapil Sibal, says, 'The motherboard, its chip, the processing, connectivity, all of them cumulatively cost around $35, including memory, display, everything.' Using a memory card instead of a hard drive, and running a Linux OS, the designers have managed to keep the price low, and are now looking for manufacturing partners. The tablet can be used for functions like word processing, Web browsing, and video conferencing. It has a solar power option too, which is important in India's less developed areas, though that add-on costs extra."

294 comments

  1. At that price.. by Walterk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sign me up for one. Maybe 5.

    1. Re:At that price.. by Krneki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sign me up for one. Maybe 5.

      Just don't be surprised then the electricity bill will be much higher then using some modern hardware.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    2. Re:At that price.. by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why? Plentiful electricity is a much bigger issue in India. It's bound to be frugal with energy, most likely having some ARM, etc.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:At that price.. by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will likely use a fraction of electricity that a modern laptop uses. If for no other reason than at that price point you can't get batteries with big capacities plus all the other components.

      So the bill won't be higher, even with 5. Now, if you did a beowulf cluster with 1000s, yeah, some pricier components probably will give better performance per electrical unit.

    4. Re:At that price.. by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why am I picturing something that resembles an Etch-a-Sketch?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely.

      Give me two, put a hinge between them (and a usb cable). Put leather around it (or maybe faux leather, because, you know...)

      Hell, make it the "signature edition" and I'll gladly buy a 3rd unit for an Indian student. Everyone wins.

    6. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just don't be surprised then [sic] the electricity bill will be [sic] much higher then [sic] using some modern hardware.

      What information do you have that would remotely support this conclusion?

      To make a $35 laptop, they don't have a huge R&D effort making their own parts to compete with Intel and Corsair. They're going to use commodity (read: cheap, reliable, off-the-shelf) components (motherboard, cpu, ram, etc.) that are Linux-supported -- or close enough to be able to add support without too much effort.

      Considering that they're going to have a solar-powered option -- with solar power generating about 10-watts per sq ft -- how big exactly did you imagine this laptop?

      The basic formula for posting on a forum is:

      1) Think.
      2) Type.

      You missed a step.

    7. Re:At that price.. by kanto · · Score: 1

      Just don't be surprised then the electricity bill will be much higher then using some modern hardware.

      It's postmodern hardware so it'll come with a handcrank.

    8. Re:At that price.. by anirudh+vij · · Score: 5, Informative

      And here's the official website http://www.sakshat.ac.in/

    9. Re:At that price.. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Have you seen modern hardware? Below a thershold, the lower the cost, the less power it uses. Sure, a cheap laptop using a desktop Intel processor will use more power than a cheap laptop using the latest Laptop Enhanced (tm) processor. But I assure you, a nice little dirt cheap C3 Erza will hardly be noticed by anything.

    10. Re:At that price.. by anirudh+vij · · Score: 2, Informative

      And here's a better video (with the browser and the official website open). The touchscreen appears pretty fast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGEDizaWX0k&feature=player_embedded

    11. Re:At that price.. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny
      The basic formula for posting on a forum is:

      1) Think. 2) Type.

      Whoa there, buddy. This isn't any old forum.

      This community is comprised of people who have already done all the thinking they need to do; furthermore, both the *amount* and the *comparative intelligence* of the thinking of a single slashdotter surpasses the collective mental output of a medium-sized nation of Joe Sixpack, Suzie Handbag, and the other normals. We are each already are experts on any topic that could come up in an article discussion.

      Your formula is one step too long for those that inhabit the nerve centers of the beast we call Slashdot.

      It seems you put a lot of thought into your post -- which is wrong, for Slashdot. You should already know what to type without thinking. You, sir, are a poseur.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:At that price.. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Funny

      A hackable linux-based Etch-a-Sketch® would still be a good deal at $35.00US...

    13. Re:At that price.. by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      This Etch-a-Sketch here? Yes, I can confirm that it has dual "arm" sub-units controlled by a powerful neural net CPU (a learning computer)!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:At that price.. by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Why am I picturing something that resembles an Etch-a-Sketch?

      The resemblance ends when you try to plug an Etch-a-Sketch into the wall. Apparently running a current through one is not a good idea...

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    15. Re:At that price.. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Why, are you imagining a beowulf cluster of them?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    16. Re:At that price.. by awrowe · · Score: 2, Informative

      This community is comprised of people who have already done all the thinking they need to do;

      You know, I was just about to post a reply to this, then a committed a cardinal sin and thought about it.

      In an effort to drag a shred of on-topicness to this though, has anyone seen any proper specs on this device?

      The best I've found so far is

      According to the details,the tablet will come in three versions of 5, 7, and 9 inches display. It will be packed with 2 GB RAM memory, wi-fi connectivity, USB port and powered by a 2-watt system to suit poor power supply areas.

      but I'm sure there is more out there. That info was found at http://androidos.in/2010/07/35-android-tablet-is-here-in-india-price-can-go-down-to-10/, for the sake of interest.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    17. Re:At that price.. by awrowe · · Score: 1

      Bangra Steam Punk?

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    18. Re:At that price.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'd be pretty shocked at "much" higher. You aren't going to get your pick of first-run 22nm silicon in a $35 device; but you aren't going to get screaming clock speeds, either. I'd assume that you are looking at a more or less standard ARM SoC, probably one of the slightly older ones, manufactured on a slightly older process; but a small die running pretty slowly.

      If you wanted the same performance; but were willing to pay $100, you could almost certainly get better efficiency; but this isn't one of those "using your old full-tower ATX Pentium as a router" 'older=inefficient' stories...

    19. Re:At that price.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I've got a flat screen monitor, 40 inches wide, I believe that yours says 'etch-a-sketch' on the side..."

    20. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      SOMEbody's gonna get hurt...real bad...

    21. Re:At that price.. by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      It certainly would be, even with the obligatory $34.99 s&h fees when you find them on ebay.

    22. Re:At that price.. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      If you already have a smart phone, this will not impress you at all.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    23. Re:At that price.. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Of course you won't be allowed to import them into the US because they won't have paid the Etch-A-Sketch patent licensing fees!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:At that price.. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Your theory only holds true insofar as the slashdotter has not accidentally RTFA'd. If TFA is read, all bets are off.

    25. Re:At that price.. by blue_teeth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indian here. Ditto. Sign me up for equal number.

      I've heard similar noise on Simputer years before. While I wish the project my best, I fail to see how it can be delivered.
      Again, check on Simputer story.

      --./me goes back puttering on his Thinkpad

    26. Re:At that price.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I saw the picture. It looks more like a touchscreen pin-pad for a POS terminal.

      Those things are ubiquitous, and probably cost about $35 already. Making one into a Linux box doesn't seem to have been much trouble.

    27. Re:At that price.. by misxn · · Score: 2

      Which is why there will be a solar option.

    28. Re:At that price.. by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      Sak (of) Shat? Seriously?

    29. Re:At that price.. by anirudh+vij · · Score: 1

      In hindi and sanskrit it means "literate".

    30. Re:At that price.. by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      I'm obviously Sanskrit illiterate.

    31. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is Indian, so understand that. Try to write something about Indians and Chinese in /. that resembles to a critic and you will get those kind of replies.
      They get afraid that their bosses read that and realize they are useless code monkeys and decide to ship them back to the 3rd World slum where they came from.
      Just notice that since Indians became top executives of Big Corporations we are drowning in this endless worldwide economic depression. Is their fault with their 7-11 kind of education. They are just not prepared.
      Tired of H1Bers and their "1/3rd of an American salary" way to steal our jobs. I am moving to Arizona.

    32. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, like the http://myboogieboard.com/ ?

    33. Re:At that price.. by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      I think around here it works like:

      1) Hype
      2) Type

    34. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did my mental voice automatically shift to sound like Cliff Clavin while I was reading this?

    35. Re:At that price.. by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      If you already have a smart phone, this will not impress you at all.

      And if you can afford a smart phone, why would you be buying a government subsidised tablet for school kids?

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    36. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! How can you be so lame? Don't make all we non-Indians look like idiots.

      Steal our jobs? We charge more, they charge less. It is competition. Simple competition. We are losing and cribbing about it. Grow up kid.

    37. Re:At that price.. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You and 1 in 3 Indians, which this device hopes to help with.

    38. Re:At that price.. by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Lol either that was a great twist on a line from Snatch or I'm laughing for no reason.

    39. Re:At that price.. by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Up.
      It's a quote from "Weird Al" Yankovic - It's All About The Pentiums.
      Weird Al lyrics and Monty Pythong quotes must always be modded up.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    40. Re:At that price.. by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      The OS looks like Android to me ...

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    41. Re:At that price.. by kuthkameen · · Score: 1

      You and 1 in 3 Indians, which this device hopes to help with.

      I don't think this device can help people become literate. In fact it can be targeted at India's large middle class base.

      --
      "Do not confuse the unusual with the impossible" - Psmith
    42. Re:At that price.. by Chih · · Score: 1

      You sir are not only a gentleman and a scholar, but an entertainer as well. You win the internets

      --
      For best results, avoid doing stupid things.
    43. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad, when are you finally going to let that incident go?

    44. Re:At that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch your ass you white supremacist bum. Redneck bums like you aren't welcome in Arizona - you aren't going to get a job there either. You'll be forced to live in a slum amidst druggies. You'll soon be shot dead by a Mexican drug lord. In your dying moments, you will wish you were in an Indian slum instead, where you'd have to contend with only poverty, and no violence.

    45. Re:At that price.. by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      perhaps because /. + IT + India = wharrgarbl? =)

      Here's what a cursory click-through on tfa showed - article with pic.

      In essence, the creators appear to have thoroughly understood this. It doesn't have to do everything, just enough of the most relevant things for most people. Now, if only it were exported here, I'd love to get one.

    46. Re:At that price.. by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Displays PDFs?
      Less than $50?
      Buy.

  2. Nice Job by klingens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now the only question left is: when does it come to a shop near me?

    1. Re:Nice Job by aicrules · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Much like the super cheap car, once it comes to 1st world countries like the U.S. all of the pesky requirements like product safety will add a 300%+ premium to it. You may appreciate not absorbing your daily dose of lead or radiation, or having the possibility of the whole thing exploding, but if those things don't bother you, probably worth importing them yourself!

    2. Re:Nice Job by fredjh · · Score: 1

      Yeah... they want to subsidize it? Sell them in the U.S. for $70... then for every one sold here, they can give one to someone who needs it there.

      --
      Stupid, sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Nice Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How close do you live to New Delhi?

    4. Re:Nice Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Now the only question left is: when does it come to a shop near me?

      it won't.

      Making the best product for the least amount of money is not the main driver when designing hi-tech gadgets anymore.
      Keeping control and profit maximizing market segmentation are.

      So this thing will either suck, or it will be artificially made useless for us rich westerners somehow.

    5. Re:Nice Job by bazorg · · Score: 1

      my FUDometer just exploded. thanks a lot.

  3. Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but what kind? TFA didn't make any mention of it (or any specs, for that matter). Anyone have any additional info on this thing?

    1. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1, Funny

      At a $35 price point, I would posit that any touchscreen could be categorized as 'shitty' although there is a chance that it will be 'sucktastic'.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by sznupi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess it could have just as well an UI like ATMs or, basically, many "feature phones" - buttons around the screen (is it even color? Or maybe just CSTN, etc.?) corresponding to functionality. That would complicate some stuff of course - but it could even have a full mini keyboard? (mobile phone style? Kindle has it) Throw in USB for some external one, they're inexpensive.

      Or perhaps touchscreens have become in reality cheap enough, we just aren't allowed to experience it... (certainly it seems they can potentially become cheaper? - massively easier mechanical design, not much addition of electroncic stuff)

      I'm really glad from this announcement (and XO-3) - they show what the price really can be. Now, hopefully this category of devices won't be derailed a bit, like what basically happened to netbooks so far...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by anirudh+vij · · Score: 2, Informative

      No specs released yet. All thats certain is that it has a touchscreen,internet access (wifi), usb ports, and a form factor thats something like a smallish rectangular ipad

    4. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by anirudh+vij · · Score: 5, Informative

      ok sorry. Posted too early. 2GB solid state disk with 32 GB addon. 2 watts power consumption. Solar panel addon (price not included in base cost). & inch touch screen. Got this from http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2010/07/23/23-tablet-pc-unveiled-in-india/

    5. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      If it can do word processing, browse the internet and maybe spreadsheets... and its $35, I'll buy one.

    6. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'd buy one just to take notes in meetings at work. I can hardly read my own handwriting, lol

    7. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by anirudh+vij · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quoting from http://news.softpedia.com/news/Indian-Government-Unveils-Quite-Powerful-10-Tablet-148828.shtml """ At the heart of the 10.5-inch tablet lies an ARM chip. The exact chip set to be used has not been disclosed, but it is known that 2GB of memory will be present to back it up. The display is a color touchscrenn with multi-touch support. Furthermore, the configuration includes cloud storage, 10/100 Ethernet, WiFi b/g , a so-called highly-customized operating system and even support for Adobe Flash. Thus, there will be no issues regarding online videos and interactive educational content. Finally, the device comes with a digital camera and compatibility with OpenOffice.org documents, Adobe PDF and various multimedia formats. """

    8. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by billyswong · · Score: 1

      If it can do word processing, browse the internet and maybe spreadsheets... and its $35, I'll buy one.

      But it can't run flash games!

    9. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm really glad from this announcement (and XO-3) - they show what the price really can be.

      Well, for some definition of "really can be". This seems to be very simil to the same thing that India first announced as a $10 laptop, then revealed not to be a laptop but to be some kind of device with storage and an LCD screen but no keyboard and actually be likely to cost $30. Now its a tablet with a hoped-for initial $35 price -- without any manufacturer lined up, and with nothing cited supporting the $35 price (and, since no manufacturer is lined up, it almost certainly based on any manufacturer's estimate of what they can actually produce the device for.)

      Its (comparatively) easy to put together a prototype and state a hoped-for mass production price and release date. Its often much harder to get a manufacturer that can mass produce the product at the price and meet the hoped-for release date.

    10. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Schadrach · · Score: 1

      Why does this sound more and more like something to buy and experiment with Chromium OS on?

    11. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I'll buy three just to mess around with! I'm sure I'll find plenty of uses for a handheld PC with a tiny power draw and solar power option.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    12. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by anirudh+vij · · Score: 1

      I believe the videos show android, but I'm not very sure of it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGEDizaWX0k&feature=player_embedded Android is the more obvious choice, since it was targeted at smartphones. Anyway,was'nt Chromium OS intended for netbooks? Does it have support for a multitouch display?

    13. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by jmerlin · · Score: 1

      Google's reaction: And I would've gotten away with it too if it weren't for those meddling slashdotters!

    14. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny

      It can do porn. What else matters?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    15. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by naz404 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they say it's going to run Adobe Flash: Indian Government Unveils Quite Powerful $10 Tablet

    16. Re:Tablet implies a touchable screen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can do porn. What else matters?
      --
      A million lemmings can't be wrong.

      I call rule 34 on your sig.

  4. Cheap stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if Europeans could get one.

  5. AP link by jav1231 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do go to the AP link if you want to "see" it. Funny that they start their story, "It looks like an iPad." The next line should have been, "But I guess you'll never know."

    Pics are on the second link here: http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/07/23/india.thirty.five.dollar.laptop/

    1. Re:AP link by jav1231 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do=Do not...I for suck.

    2. Re:AP link by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pics are still less than satisfactory. What goes into this design, and what are the catches ? Slow as hell ? No touchscreen ?

      Incidentially the second part of the article is (potentially) revealing :

      "The aim is to reach such devices to the students of colleges and universities, and to provide these institutions a host of choices of low-cost access devices around Rs 1,500 ($35) or less in near future," the human resources ministry said at the launch of the computer.

      Meaning it's not this tablet that's $35, it's just that they're working on devices like that. Could this mean that they don't actually have device schematics for this device at $35 ?

    3. Re:AP link by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:AP link by Reginald2 · · Score: 1

      Why does it look like the case is alligator skin? I'm not sure, but don't they give a shit about things like that? Aside from that little oversight, this could be the last nail in the American-technology coffin.

    5. Re:AP link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How exactly would a tablet without a touchscreen work? I think they call that a picture.

    6. Re:AP link by dpolak · · Score: 1

      Damn it's running Android. Sign me up for 4 of them. This would be a great tool to use.

      It would be nice to see the specs on it, as well as what it would take to get them shipped here with the solar kit.

    7. Re:AP link by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2, Informative
      Thanks for that link, with not only pictures, but some useful specs:
      "According to the details,the tablet will come in three versions of 5, 7, and 9 inches display. It will be packed with 2 GB RAM memory, wi-fi connectivity, USB port and powered by a 2-watt system to suit poor power supply areas. It will laso have apps like internet browser, PDF reader, video conferencing facilities, open office, sci-lab, media player, remote device management capability, multimedia input-output interface option, and multiple content viewer."

      2-watt, wifi, 2GB RAM? 5-9 inch screens? For US$35? SOLD. I'll take two. Even if the processor turns out to be the equivalent of a Pentium Classic (but I'd guess a-few-hundred-Mhz ARM or equivalent i.e. at least as fast as the overpriced and still-out-of-date Motorola® CLIQ with MOTOBLUR (as they insist on calling it in print). Definitely a bargain if one will be able to actually get them outside of India)...

    8. Re:AP link by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Why does it look like the case is alligator skin? I'm not sure, but don't they give a shit about things like that? Aside from that little oversight, this could be the last nail in the American-technology coffin.

      Oh yeah? Well, if it IS alligator, then US is the only supplier! Take that, China.

      Then again, China does have its own alligators, but those are endangered. Certainly no enough for more than a few thousand tablets, max.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    9. Re:AP link by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I was actually hoping it would be running a more open OS, but I'm still interested.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:AP link by spazdor · · Score: 1

      a stylus pda.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    11. Re:AP link by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      2-watt, wifi, 2GB RAM? 5-9 inch screens? For US$35? SOLD. I'll take two.

      Yeah, I can't imagine any device hitting this price point with those features. Even getting the cost down that low would probably be a 2-3 year timeframe.

      For example, about the best price on 2GB of any kind of RAM is US$30 at retail. Even assuming that 2GB RAM soldered onto a specially designed board with a large quantity order would be only $15, that's still too much, as obviously the touchscreen would be at least the same price.

      Then, there's the case (custom, almost certainly) and the actual assembly. Even at US$3.50/hour, somebody building 10 of these an hour would add $0.35 to the cost. That's nothing on a $400 device, but it's 1% of the target cost here.

    12. Re:AP link by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      even at US$3.50/month,

      Thats fixed it for you.

      Hint: India

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:AP link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is 100% open source. How, exactly, can you get more open than Android?

    14. Re:AP link by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I'd run a modified version of Android with the remote app install/kill capabilities removed, for starters.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:AP link by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      even at US$3.50/month,

      Thats fixed it for you.

      Hint: India

      Wikipedia says I'm far closer than you are.

      With an average income of $550/month for members of the workforce, and 52% of that workforce in agriculture (which drags the average down), my $600/month estimate (which is what $3.50/hour works out to be) is probably low, which was what I was going for.

  6. Bad FA by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No specs at all. How fast is its processor? How much memory? Is it touch enabled? TFA doesn't say.

    1. Re:Bad FA by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      For that price I'd get one anyway!

    2. Re:Bad FA by rotide · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm going to have to agree. For $35 I'd pick one up just to see what it does. Even if I had to get a wireless kb/mouse to use it, it would still be an interesting toy. The funny part is, the wireless kb/mouse combo might cost more than the tablet!

    3. Re:Bad FA by tophermeyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could not agree more. $35 for this would be incredible, at this price point it is even more attractive than simple e-readers. Like any other tablet this is perfect for portable internet browsing. But at this cheap price I would be more comfortable taking it into the kitchen to read recipes or out to the garage to review car repair walkthroughs, those are things I would not do with a $600 iPad.

      Though one point I wasn't exactly clear on in the article was the subsidy that India would provide to students purchasing this. I wonder if their claimed $35 cost already includes a hypothetical subsidy.

    4. Re:Bad FA by rotide · · Score: 1

      "India has unveiled the prototype of a $35 basic touchscreen tablet aimed at students, which it hopes to bring into production by 2011. The government plans to subsidize the tablets so the cost to students could be $20; and eventually, they hope the cost will fall to $10 per unit."

      Sounds like the unit actually costs $35 to make in India.
      With initial subsidy: $20
      Cost drop with sustained subsidy: $10 hopefully (cheaper parts, etc)

      You know it won't be a great PC for $35, but if it has WiFi, does basic web browsing (non-flash, etc, just JavaScript) and can display PDF's/eBooks.. WIN!. A take anywhere and not worry about it PC.

    5. Re:Bad FA by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I would too, but I'm still curious as to what the specs are.

    6. Re:Bad FA by sznupi · · Score: 1

      As long as it can its job, the specs don't matter much; other than "we must use something good enough."

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Bad FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No specs at all. How fast is its processor? How much memory? Is it touch enabled? TFA doesn't say.

      2GB is the RAM . Lets assume that the processor is a low priced one . But I am guessing should be an average one . I am also excited about the wireless and USB port . Which means I can plugin my 3G USB card and I can get wireless all over for 35 $ :D

    8. Re:Bad FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it 35 for the BOM? i.e for the parts. Having worked for a device manufacturer you can multiply that by 5 straight off for the initial pre-tax retail price. Unless they plan to bypass all that pay the employees and make a profit for the shareholders thing.

  7. This is for us? by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean just doing a quick scan of the article it makes it sound like it's more for Indians (dot, not feather) and other 3rd worlders. You know, people that can't blow a thousand bucks on a computer. If it helps improve their standard of living more power to them. (Hopefully it gets further than that One Laptop thing.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:This is for us? by jc42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I mean just doing a quick scan of the article it makes it sound like it's more for Indians ... and other 3rd worlders. ... If it helps improve their standard of living more power to them. (Hopefully it gets further than that One Laptop thing.)

      It's weird that this got a "troll" mod, when it's directly to the point. It's especially appropriate in comparison with all the posts saying in essence that it'll be a crappy machine for 1st-world countries. People have missed the point that wealthy populations aren't the intended customers. Don't expect to order one of these from Dell or Amazon. The customers are people whose annual income is less than most /. readers make in a day.

      The OLPC comparison is also relevant. One thing this price point should help with is that we might not see a repeat of Microsoft sending in reps to "talk to" the managers looking to order these machines. That was partially effective at limiting the OLPC, but it's clear that this machine is aimed at a market in areas where Windows is available, but people can't afford it even if they can get it free.

      This thing's main competitors are cheap phones, for which it is an upgrade. Comparing it with first-world laptops and desktops merely shows cluelessness.

      (Actually, comparing it with the iPhone/iPad pair might be relevant. But there's no real competition there, because they're aiming at a market in which an iPhone or iPad costs more than the mean annual income. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:This is for us? by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm half feather half dot, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:This is for us? by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      I think there's a potential market in the west for this thing. At the very least, its a PDF reader with a 7" screen for $35. At that price I don't really care how well it can compute, I would just use it to display my PDFs.

    4. Re:This is for us? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      An obvious parallel is the way that bottom-quality 4-function calculators are now given out as trinkets. You could make a similar criticism that they're not usable as powerful scientific calculators. But that's equally beside the point. Dumb little 4-function calculators have a lot of uses, and making them for a total cost of a few pennies is a socially useful thing to do. At least it is until everyone has one of these $35 computers, for which free calculator apps will be available that are much better than a 4-function calculator.

      A similar phenomenon has happened with watches. I stopped wearing one 10 years ago, when I realized that it had become nearly impossible to get out of sight of a working clock, at least in urban areas. Sales of watches generally have plummeted - except that sales of high-end watches are hardly affected. The lower end of the market has been replaced by the cheap digital clocks that we see everywhere. And the switch to cell phones means that nearly everyone has a clock display in their pocket or purse now.

      A couple of decades back, someone predicted that eventually a "computer" would be just a bump on a wire, and the only bulk would be in the user-interface hardware, due to the limitations of our physical bodies. We're well on the way to that state, and any companies whose sales depend on computing hardware are facing an end to their business. In another decade or so, what we now call "super-computers" will be given out like 4-function calculators are now. This new $35 computer will be too bulky and expensive to manufacture.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:This is for us? by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      The customers are people whose annual income is less than most /. readers make in a day.

      Random data point: I had a protracted conversation with a car load (five or six, jammed into a Toyota Corolla or thereabouts) of Indian students the other day. I asked them if they knew of anyone hiring C++ developers, and they all broke out into hearty peals of laughter.

      Apparently they're all over here in the US getting electrical engineering degrees so they can go home and earn $10,000 USD a year and live like kings. I make twice that at a crappy subsistence job I took because it paid more than unemployment. It's pretty sobering.

    6. Re:This is for us? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      People have missed the point that wealthy populations aren't the intended customers. Don't expect to order one of these from Dell or Amazon.

      and just why exactly should a student in the UK "have to" pay £300 for a laptop PC if the guys in India can build a useful linux tablet for a small fraction of that price?

    7. Re:This is for us? by LihTox · · Score: 1

      I'm actually reminded of the PADDs used in Star Trek: we often see characters with several PADDs piled on their desk, each containing a different document. Make them cheap enough and they could become the new portable media, like a DVD with a built-in screen.

    8. Re:This is for us? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      and just why exactly should a student in the UK "have to" pay £300 for a laptop PC if the guys in India can build a useful linux tablet for a small fraction of that price?

      Well the obvious reason is that your economic and social "betters" have decided that you don't need that cheap tablet, and you'd be better off paying for their laptop PC. So they've arranged for it to be sufficiently difficult to import the cheap linux tablet that the manufacturer won't try to leap through all the bureaucratic hoops to sell it to you.

      There's precedent for this. There have been a number of reports that several cheap tablet/laptop machines introduced into the US with only MS Windows were sold first in Asia with linux. But the US importers "knew" that nobody here would want that weird linux OS, so they sold it with the OS that all Americans know and love. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  8. It's going to suck. by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have tried at LEAST 15 different Android tablets and all of them are garbage hardware that is too slow to run even Android 1.5... how are they going to make an even cheaper tablet that will actually have battery life and run a GUI?

    $35.00 = 200mhz processor and almost no ram and storage plus B&W screen.

    If the biggest electronics makers cant make a $199.00 tablet with a free GUI/OS called android work well, how the hell do they think they can do it in less than 25%?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It's going to suck. by SLot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may suck compared to what you and I are used to, but it's better than nothing at all.

      I imagine those that will be using them will sing a slightly different tune than you do.

    2. Re:It's going to suck. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Do any of them show any promise at all?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:It's going to suck. by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Looking at the articles and pics of it, it does indeed have a colour screen.
      And your statement brings out my real question:
      If india can make a working tablet for $35 that, while probably underpowered, can do web, email, and wordprocessing,
      Why are the big companies cheapest products $200 or more?
      Hopefully, after (if) these get rolled out in India, the other manufacturers will start competing a little harder.
      Also, if this Indian tablet supports flash, I'll have a nice little chuckle.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    4. Re:It's going to suck. by SchizoDuckie · · Score: 1

      You have tried 15 *android* tablets? I've actually seen *ONE* in real life, 230 on the 'We are creating an android tablet!' bandwagon, and maybe 4 that are for sale on chinavasion.com with 5-7" screens Which have you tested then ? (and you know the ones you printed yourself on cardboard don't count!')

      --
      Quack damn you!
    5. Re:It's going to suck. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Back in the day we used to get a lot done on 8mhz and half a meg of RAM with a B&W screen.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:It's going to suck. by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pandigital Novel - Best of them all as it runs Android 2.0

      Archos 7 -- utter and COMPLETE garbage... Hardware was designed by a insane idiot that was being hit in the head with a hammer while being designed.

      Archos 5 -- Better than the 7 but still complete crap.

      Matricom tablet - Can we put a slower processor in there as well as not let it sleep?

      Camangi Webstation -- Just plain old junk.

      E-Lectio M5 This one crashed on a regular basis. it also would turn its self on for no reason at random times.

      Several of the china UMPC tablets ranging from $99.00 to $199.00 many are copies of each other.

      I suggest you actually look to see what is out there.. Most of them are complete junk because of really low grade hardware, bad design or simply idiots at the wheel during design phase.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:It's going to suck. by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Engadget, it has 2 GB of RAM (see http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/23/35-tablet-from-india-looks-to-be-worth-every-paisa-video/ )

      But I think a lot of price considerations have to do with the fact that most westerners aren't going to buy something with a price point that is "too" cheap. People are used to paying $200 for even the cheapest notebooks/netbooks/tablets, if people see a $35 one, they are probably just going to buy the more expensive one to save on "quality" even if they are the same device.

      Of course, this was the same India that created the $10 non-laptop-component-printer that cost $30... So take any reports from cheap electronics in India with a grain of salt...

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    8. Re:It's going to suck. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      $35 is the parts cost, not the cost for the consumer. You need to compare like to like, and we don't have a consumer cost for this, and we don't have parts cost for the others.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    9. Re:It's going to suck. by anirudh+vij · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does support flash http://www.sakshat.ac.in/

    10. Re:It's going to suck. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I would take gladly B&W screen in the least expensive versions; why do we need color for most of the stuff we do on PCs/etc. anyway? (accidentally, the /. page on which I'm writing this reply is completelly greyscale except for yellow "DON'T FEAR THE PUNGUINS"...that's why we need color?)

      Cheaper, saving battery, can be made very good even without backlight (saving the costs and even more the battery) - what's not to like?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:It's going to suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 32-bit CPU running at 8 MHz and 512 KiB of RAM running a GUI? I used to get a lot done on an 8-bit CPU running at 1.79 MHz and only 64 KiB of RAM running a Basic interpreter.

    12. Re:It's going to suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well, the prototype parts are $35, they say. To get this thing up and saleable in Western markets, you're going to have to jump through all manner of hoops for CE certification, physical testing, durability, servicing, legal fees, distribution channels, advertising, yada yada - it'll hit $100 before it gets anywhere near you.
      With the Indian government sponsoring it, they can "eliminate" a lot of our standard consumer regulations and testing and standards compliance for their local population. They don't need to advertise it either, or wrap it up, or provide manuals in 10 languages - it'll be handed out in volume at universities and schools, and there's plenty of brains and energy there to cover the shortfall of not having a "commercial" product. Just reading slashdot histories about the XO shows that getting such beasties to market is a hard task indeed. Not to mention the FUD that will fly once the incumbents get wind of being undercut like that.

    13. Re:It's going to suck. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      how the hell do they think they can do it in less than 25%?

      It's being overseen, designed, and manufactured in India. All of the benefits of outsourcing with none of the overhead.

      Joking aside, a $35 tablet would probably hit $100 on a real market, after company and retailer profit. Further, being a government with educational institute ties the development cost is entirely eaten, and not reflected in the price. Add in real packaging and materials and a marketing campaign, and you might actually be pretty close to a $150 retail mark.

      If you look at the photos, it's a color screen. 2 GB of memory isn't going to blow anyone away, but that's comparable to the OLPC I have sitting here. The processor probably won't either, but this is Linux we're talking about. If you can't scale a Linux install to run well on slow hardware, you don't deserve to be manufacturing millions of units that everybody's going to surf on.

      As a side note, the biggest electronics makers can't throw together a desktop computer that's better than one we assemble ourselves off the shelf. They're notoriously bad at making alterations to operating systems. And their goal is not to drive prices down, but to find reasons to keep prices high. Why would they even attempt to release a $35 tablet?

    14. Re:It's going to suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you'd have to fab a B&W screen. Ironically, it might make the cost higher since no one makes those these days.

      As quantity goes up, price goes down.

    15. Re:It's going to suck. by trickyD1ck · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, after (if) these get rolled out in India, the other manufacturers will start competing a little harder.

      Manufacturers are competing already. It is just that obviously there is more consumer demand for $500-1000 iPhones and Androids. Most people wouldn't by this Indian gadget even for $10, because it is of no use to them. An iPhone, on the contrary, is.

    16. Re:It's going to suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      according to the article the indian government plans to subsidise it so the cost for students would be $20

      The main reason we don't get things that cheap over here is:

      We can afford to pay more.

      It is entierly possible that India can get the components a bit cheaper than we would,
      alot of computer components have a fairly high profit margin and the big costs are up front (building the factories and equipment needed to produce them) , if a manufacturer has spare capacity they might benefit by selling the excess cheaper to the Indian government rather than trying to raise demand by lowering prices overall.

    17. Re:It's going to suck. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Wimp!
      Real men don't need more than 3.25 MHz, 2K of RAM, and an old TV.
      http://oldcomputers.net/ts1000.html

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    18. Re:It's going to suck. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      If india can make a working tablet for $35 that, while probably underpowered, can do web, email, and wordprocessing,
      Why are the big companies cheapest products $200 or more?

      When you don't actually have anyone committed to manufacture any of the devices at any price, its easy to say the price will be $35.

      Its a little bit harder to deliver.

    19. Re:It's going to suck. by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      For the people who use desktops as their main computer(s) but would like something to read books/idly browse the web from the couch, etc, $500-$1000 is ridiculous. And I think there's a large enough market of these sort of people.
      Then again, I'm in development, not sales, so I'm probably wrong.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    20. Re:It's going to suck. by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      True, but I was speculating on the assumption that it was, which is why I stated "If India can..."
      Time will tell. I hope they succeed.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    21. Re:It's going to suck. by MrMacman2u · · Score: 1

      Reporters wouldn't know the difference between RAM and permanent storage if it raped their mother.

      I'll bet anything that it mean the machine has 2GB of FLASH and the initial article writer/translator got confused by the concept of more than one kind of memory.

      --
      This signature is lame.
    22. Re:It's going to suck. by kegon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why are the big companies cheapest products $200 or more?

      1. Because they are trying to make a profit for their shareholders, their company and most importantly so they can continue having jobs.
      2. Because they have to recoup research and development costs. The commercial market demands products that are progressive. Not many people would buy a tablet running Android 0.9, certainly not enough to be viable. For schools though, functional is all that matters. So what if the kids have to wait a few seconds longer for their browser to load up a page ?

      Remember the MacBook Air teardown where they showed it could be made cheaper ? Of course it can be done if you cut all the corners and you're not interested in profit.

      Hopefully, after (if) these get rolled out in India, the other manufacturers will start competing a little harder.

      As an engineer I just love how people anticipate that gadgets will continually fall in price and "hopefully" get even cheaper. While I'm working my ass off to get something competitive out the door that might make me enough profit to pay for food, electricity and internet.

      I hope someone undercuts your job!

      Also, if this Indian tablet supports flash, I'll have a nice little chuckle.

      Supporting Flash is a political decision not a technical decision. What makes you think a bottom rung ARM will run Flash anyway ?

    23. Re:It's going to suck. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      It's called marketing and advertising, and it's got one of the biggest budgets you're likely to find.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  9. They may be cheap and junky, by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    but at least my dream of having a stack of "PADDs" piled up on my desk (Star Trek TNG style) may finally come true!

    I have the communicator, now for a working tricorder.....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:They may be cheap and junky, by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Forget PADDs, I want a matter replicator!

    2. Re:They may be cheap and junky, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me also loves the tricorder .. tablets like this brings them closer as people keep on hacking the h/w or s/w will be creating amazing stuff out of it . Wait till all engg students get hold of it :D

  10. Re:Here we go again. by S.O.B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Again India, they try to produce super cheap stuff nobody real wants. Why would I buy their junk, when 2nd hand stuff in my country cost the same and is much better? I can already get a 2nd hand PC for almost nothing, but since I earn enough, I want to spoil myself.

    India isn't trying to sell you anything. From the article:

    The project is part of an ambitious education technology initiative, which also aims to bring broadband connectivity to India's 25,000 colleges and 504 universities and make study materials available online.

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  11. Re:Later that day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The car does exist you pretentious moron!!! it's called the TATA Nano and it's running on the roads!! do a friggin' google search! and there was never a sub-$100 shuttle!! atleast much better than the stupid NASA running losses!!!

  12. Re:Later that day by toppavak · · Score: 5, Informative

    You mean the Tata Nano?

  13. Innovation! by artgeeq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is a big deal. Who really believes that outsourcing technology operations to India and China does not have a long-term consequence? With time, India and China will become innovators -- if they have not already. Reportedly, China has already built the world's second-fastest supercomputer, and is fabricating its own chips (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/science/01compute.html).

    Imagine, now, young people thoughout the world writing software. What platform would they choose? If I was growing up in India and had an accessible computer for $35, I probably would not want to pay a whole lot more for a Windows computer.

    Maybe this tablet does not quite have it right, technologically. But it is a step forward and an indication of intention on the part of the Indian government.

    1. Re:Innovation! by pankajmay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rightly said!
      This is simply an example of countries trying to develop themselves and their resources. It may be shitty compared to what is available in the developed world, but its a start -- we have all paid through our noses for costly micro-processing power that sometimes are pathetically underutilized doing tasks such as browsing and occasional document composition.

      Though I am aware that the original article is sorely lacking details, and it seems more a marketing hype, but even if they manage to do take off with this, it will be marvelous and a little help to millions who at this point cannot even hope to achieve a life with basic necessities, leave alone sitting comfortably ordering a powerful computer.

      This is not for Americans, nor should it be expected that the hardware would be any comparable to what is considered minimal in America, but its a start; an attempt to introduce a bit of technology so people who would otherwise have no chance to even aim for a middle-class life are empowered.

    2. Re:Innovation! by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who was working on dynamically changing advertising screens, but the costs were prohibitive. Assuming a retail markup, a 70 dollar screen-with-wifi jammed under a big block of plexiglass might enable them to do a lot.

      Similarly, museums and tours could hand people tablets as they came in, and collect them on the other side. One broke? Whatever, just grab another one off a rack.

      A touchscreen computer this small would be great for Point Of Sale in Mexico, as people who normally conduct all transactions in cash from their pocket struggle to deal with new digital reporting regulations.

      Easy menu updating at small restaurants, interactive mall layout maps... at that price, it's cheap enough to really spark another evolution in the integration of computers to everybody's lives.

    3. Re:Innovation! by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I think this is a big deal.

      Did you think it was a "big deal" and "innovation" last year when India announced they would make a $10 tablet?

      Do you remember how that turned out?

    4. Re:Innovation! by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is not for Americans, nor should it be expected that the hardware would be any comparable to what is considered minimal in America, but its a start; an attempt to introduce a bit of technology so people who would otherwise have no chance to even aim for a middle-class life are empowered.

      It should be. I have customers running my software at their office for whom this would be an ideal system for their employees to use in the field. It doesn't have to be a high-powered computer. It just has to be powerful enough to run a field version of my software, and have functioning wireless or an Ethernet port (either will work).

      If the unsubsidized price is low enough, this would have great small business marketability in the U.S.

    5. Re:Innovation! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is not for Americans

      Well, it will be. once someone's gathered the venture capital finance to acquire a company set up specifically to purchase, import, sell for $200, and (most important) squirrel the profits away in a tax-efficient, highly-leveraged off-shore subsidiary.

      Isn't that the American Way?

    6. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it cost $100 in the end with ALL overheads added - so? That's still excellent, no?

    7. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy and cheap to be innovative when you can throw hundreds of monkeys with typewriters at the problem (please, no racial bias here, just using a common metaphor), which is what many of these "computer science" and "electrical engineers" coming en masse out of universities in India and China are akin to. Most of them barely can get jobs selling computers, much less doing interesting (and quality) software and hardware creation.

      It's also easy to be cheap and innovative when you have no regard for safe or humane manufacturing processes. In China, they have these towns where people strip copper off old motherboards for cents to reuse and recycle, and the chemicals they use to reclaim most useable materials are toxic and harmful to the people constantly exposed to them. But it's okay right? All for the sake of progress for the People's Republic, no?

      And the Windows hate is so 1999.

      We proved already in the OLPC and netbooks (you don't think they cost Dell $200 to make, do you?) that we can make a decent computer for about $120. $30 is definitely possible (manufacturing cost), but, given the notable lack of specs or example videos, I believe it's so underpowered as to be difficult to use, as was the OLPC. But for people who have never used a computer before, it's better than nothing.

      What I do appreciate is that the government of India recognizes the value of such an effort, in terms of investing in the future through their children, which is something the United States, for a variety of reasons, seems unable to understand. Considering that India has over 200 different languages and dialects and we only have one or two, this is just a sobering example of what we can't accomplish because we're so tied up in our own magnificence.

    8. Re:Innovation! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I realize the hardware is extremely low end, but I'm still having trouble swallowing the $35 price tag. $150 I might believe, but $35 is just ridiculous. You can't get a 5" LCD from China for $35, let alone the rest of the components + assembly.

      Also, did anyone else notice that the Indian human resources development minister bears an uncanny resemblance to Pope Benedict?

    9. Re:Innovation! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      This is simply an example of countries trying to develop themselves and their resources.

      Well, no. They're developing resources that were handed to them by us. Not actually by all of us, but by those of us who had nominal control of those resources, whose job was to preserve their value, who instead realized they could be tossed over the wall to someone else who would make them more money. Not us. We lost money, jobs, and competitive advantage.

      It's as though India and China won a war, and took a couple of $trillion out of us in the process. But it wasn't a war. It was more like treason, since our CEOs gave us up rather than fighting for us.

    10. Re:Innovation! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "This is not for Americans,"

      We shouldn't forget what "Americans" accomplished with much slower hardware. Our basic machines are much faster than what we had in say, 1999, but many of the most vital _communication_ and _information access_ tasks haven't changed much since then. PCs that old are still in common use in poor areas of the US.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Innovation! by mrawhimskell · · Score: 1

      Yes, every world power gets its time. Egypt, Greece, Assyria,Rome,Babylon, etc. If Jesus Christ tarries, i'd love to see how the next 50 years plays out. interesting times we live in.

    12. Re:Innovation! by pankajmay · · Score: 1

      Well, no. They're developing resources that were handed to them by us.

      Oh please! Enough with the melodrama. Technological exchange is something that benefits all human kind. The number system (from Arabs, and hey the concept of Zero is from India) you are using, to your expressways (modeled after Germany's Autobahns), to relaxation activities like yoga (from India again!) and to most other things were developed by people around the world.

      . Not us. We lost money, jobs, and competitive advantage.

      America is currently just passing through an economic downturn; which will be followed by an upturn -- this is not something that happened due to your "technological give-away". Oh by the way, the reason for your down turn is your own housing market.
      Let me reiterate though - America has NOT lost any competitive advantage. I see it every day in universities here in America -- innovative research being done, technological breakthroughs accomplished. You are simply moving on, developing new things for your own benefit, for Americans benefit and ultimately for humankind's benefit. Look into any research publication to see what I mean.

      The times are simply changing, the paradigms of work that YOU are familiar with are shifting and morphing into something different. You just seem to be another person who isn't comfortable with change; but change happens.

      It's as though India and China won a war, and took a couple of $trillion out of us in the process. But it wasn't a war. It was more like treason, since our CEOs gave us up rather than fighting for us.

      To show you the fallacy in your logic - Let us assume that India and China didn't do this development and are frozen in time. Here is what will happen:

      • While your world and the rest of world goes ahead, these people would be stuck without modern amenities -- disparities will increase. And do you know what happens when this disparity reaches a tipping point? People revolt and become extremists.
      • In your la..la world of developed US and Europe, your companies producing products will reach a saturation point. I mean, that everyone in developed world will have all they need and they all can buy just so many quantities of consumables. Companies will see their profits reach a flat line, especially if their products are non-perishable. The result, you will have spectacular market crash which will never recover, since the number of consumers does not changes significantly!

      Now here is what developing India and China do for you:

      • With development comes enlightenment -- they know that if they work hard there is a WAY OUT of their pathetic life situation.
      • American companies get a HUGE customer base where they can almost indefinitely expand as the population develops. This is currently going on. These people become American goods consumers. The profit comes to American companies.

      So you are looking at a partial picture -- You see the jobs going out, but you don't see the money that comes back by these people, the money generated by American companies.

      So stop crying and may be look to reinvent yourself. Because I know for a fact, that this country - USA - still rewards people for their hard work and skill. The system may be a bit unfair, but it still works. Anyone willing to put in the work and sweat still succeeds here. And just for this reason alone, this country will always come out on top.

    13. Re:Innovation! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The Arabs didn't spend a trillion dollars developing numbers and algebra.

      We did spend a trillion dollars developing the Internet. And it produced a boom economy.

      So American shipped the jobs related to it overseas for, in some cases, our enemies to earn even more of our trade deficit.

      Your melodrama about people in other countries becoming revolting extremists is silly. We've been centuries ahead of them for, well, centuries. Someone found a way to fill their own pockets with that, while raping our domestic economy in the process. Destroy a trillion dollars in value to make a billion dollars. That's the plutocratic way.

      "You see the jobs going out, but you don't see the money that comes back by these people, the money generated by American companies."

      The money comes back to a few people who control the cashflow in the multinationals that sold the jobs overseas, not to the millions of people who lost their jobs here. Your ability to get a high-paying job was cut in half, and you're saying it's a great thing.

      "I know for a fact, that this country - USA - still rewards people for their hard work and skill."

      You've been watching too much sports. This country still lays off people who work their asses off and have PhD's, and then cuts off their unemployment benefits unless the right people's backs get scratched in Congress.

      You're either a treason-monkey just like Carly Fiorina is, or you've drunk the Laissez-Faire kool-aid and ignored the hundred times it's caused nothing but Jonestown.

    14. Re:Innovation! by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Neither of these things mentioned are innovations. In both cases they're just innovating innovative technology from the west cheaper (the tablet) and on a larger scale (the super computer)

  14. Re:Here we go again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't buy it if you don't want to, motherfucker. They're not holding a gun to your ass and forcing you to buy it.

  15. Indian government develops computers? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The only reason for a government to be involved in financing development of computers is where it is not profitable for private businesses to do so, i.e it's just another subsidy and probably another national pride project. They might get a better bang for the rupee by spending the same money on subsidizing purchases of existing cheap netbooks and such which are much more powerful than this device could possibly be at that price.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industry companies were invited at the beginning to participate in the project and they declined, presumably because they do not believe an acceptable profit margin can be made at such prices. Developing the project from ground up, design, manufacturing, deployment, application development, etc can be a huge factor in providing jobs, increasing the share of the population with a basic understanding of computing, and facilitating broad education pursuits. All this could contribute to an Indian population whose talents and abilities would be more compelling for foreign investors, creating more investments, and more jobs and more tax revenue.

    2. Re:Indian government develops computers? by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, sometimes government gets involved because the private business are too busy running around each other to show any kind of creativity and explore a new market. That is not aways, mind you; not even most of the time. It is just that some times that happens.

    3. Re:Indian government develops computers? by pankajmay · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know that is a topic that is currently being fiercely debated in the civil society of India.

      Just like here in America, you have people who do not want government to be involved at all and then there are those who support government takeover.

      However, since the Indian economy has largely been a pseudo-capitalist economy and largely socialist until the early 1990s, the government gets away by doing this without any rigorous study of whether it should be doing it or handing it to private enterprise..

      I suppose as capitalism strengthens over time, and people realize that entrepreneurship is in their best interest, you will find this debate getting intense. Especially since the country is already a democracy, and as people become assured of their basic necessities, they start questioning the opportunities afforded to them.

    4. Re:Indian government develops computers? by DemApples · · Score: 1

      Um, more people rising up from gutter rat to middle class, especially in the computer market, which is absolutely KILLER for bringing in foreign coin instead of just cycling rupees internally - how do you not see this as a HUGE win for India? They are big enough to execute and they remove some of the price because of reduced profit motive - just charge enough to cover costs, and wait for the inevitable benefits.

    5. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anytime that the government gets involved, it leads to unsustainable projects with no real market, no real innovation, and poor implementation to get a government contract and free money.

      Look at Ethanol, sounds great, gas from plants, renewable and good for the environment... Except for the fact it takes more energy to make it than the ethanol contains. But of course the government subsidizes it which leads people to grow corn for ethanol rather than for feed and so taxpayers not only have to pay higher food costs but also have to pay for the subsidizes for a project that makes no sense.

      Rather than looking towards good ways to tap a market, government involvement leads to lower quality and total disregard for the target market.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    6. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like ARPANET?

      Yes, current ethanol (especially corn ethanol) is a subsidy laden boondoggle. But it's worth trying if nothing else for the science.

      If they would now instead allow for other organics, like sugar cane (like Brazil does, and, I might add, are pretty successful at) or those algae farms, we might be on to something.

      It's simply a matter of finding the right materials.

    7. Re:Indian government develops computers? by dooode · · Score: 1

      Well you would be surprised how much does research depend on Government involvement. A little more than two-third of the funds at MIT and CMU come from federal sources. Had US military not been funding research and development, there was a good chance we might still be using Abacus for counting (pun intended) :)

    8. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Informative

      An ARPANET would have been born and morphed internet with or without government support, its just in the late 60s early 1970s few people owned computers really powerful enough to go online and do anything meaningful. ARPANET was formed not because of some great government insight that private enterprise doesn't have, it was simply because no one else owned enough computers to make it be meaningful.

      And how is it worth it for the science? You burn more fossil fuels trying to make the ethanol than you can create in the ethanol! You can't just add more energy to the ethanol, its like in the 1990s when dot-com businesses would sell things at a loss and make up for it in "volume", only rather than a dot-com you have no money invested in it is instead the government stealing money out of your paycheck.

      Sugar Cane is another thing totally fucked up by governments in allowing massive tariffs to be placed on it whenever you import it, whenever the government messes with private enterprise, the consumers lose. By placing barriers to free trade in place, it pretty much means that corn syrup is cheaper than sugar cane because the US simply doesn't have enough places to grow sugar cane and because of artificial barriers its nearly impossible to import it.

      As for algae, it is in its early stages, it is certainly something to watch.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:Indian government develops computers? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Great! They should be buying up those $35 netbooks floating around India. You know, from all of those companies chomping at the bit to meet the technological educational needs of India's broke youth. As opposed to trying to make as big a profit as possible.

      It's a very different perspective when you're someone that is fundamentally ignored by a capitalist market.

    10. Re:Indian government develops computers? by awrowe · · Score: 1

      I can see your point there about government interference leading to useless products, but keep in mind, you are talking about governments like the US, Great Britain and Australian governments. Western governments. Unfortunately, governments like these see projects like this one as being yet another trough to dip their snouts in, rather than being the enlightened attempts at self improvement they could be.

      Personally, I think this is an awesome idea and if I'm given the chance, I'll jump on it. Lightly, so my oversized western arse doesn't break it.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    11. Re:Indian government develops computers? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Anytime that the government gets involved, it leads to unsustainable projects with no real market, no real innovation, and poor implementation to get a government contract and free money.

      So I guess the Hoover Dam should fit neatly in that little anti-government and anti-government projects rant. Why doesn't it fit then?

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    12. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      The hoover dam has lead to a lack of sustainability. Look at Lake Mead, the lake is in danger of going nearly completely dry because people foolishly thought that the dam could provide complete power and infinite water in the desert. However, it can't. But thanks to the Hoover Dam people started growing things that could not normally be grown in areas with little rainfall such as cotton, this lead to the rise of large cities like Las Vegas which has 90% of their drinking water coming out of Lake Mead a lake which is nearly depleted.

      All the Hoover Dam has created is a "water bubble" which is unsustainable and already in danger of collapsing, so much so that they had to put in an additional intake pipe to provide water when the other pipelines fail because the lake has gone down so much.

      Had people really looked at this before they built the dam, large cities wouldn't be living beyond their means in terms of water, but of course no one really looked at it because FDR's wealth redistribution program was "needed" to get the economy moving.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    13. Re:Indian government develops computers? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the government does do research, but it would be more efficiently spent in the private sector on R&D to go into new products to increase the nation's wealth. Almost all the research that the government does (with the exception of all the research on how to efficiently kill other people...) would be done to some extent privately. When a private company requires research, profit is the bottom line, meaning that they aren't going to spend millions on a dead end product, on the other hand, the government routinely does it. Look at NASA for an example, think of all of the things that have been canceled (or extended) to no benefit of the taxpayer. Look at Constellation, lots of money spent on what could very well turn out to be a dead end. Look at the Space Shuttle project, a technological dead-end, unsafe and more expensive than capsule-based systems like Russia's Soyuz.

      The cost is lower and the benefit is almost always higher with private enterprise, with the government there is waste everywhere, waste that spreads to paranoia (hey, you aren't going to get any more research dollars if you say Swine Flu will be just like an extended flu season...) and misinformation. Not to mention that with corporate R&D you don't have to pay for it if it turns out to be a dead end, but with government research you do.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    14. Re:Indian government develops computers? by dooode · · Score: 1

      Well in general I believe your point of view. But not 100%.

      Capitalism is good, but it does require a catalyst in form of benevolent funding for a head-start (from a Government agency). Indian IT companies are (almost) 100% privately owned, but almost all of them started with Govt support in the form of free land and tax breaks. Ditto with IT industry in Texas.

      It is not the Government's job to run companies. But Government's help in setting up agencies like NSF, DARPA etc and funding such projects goes a long way in helping research that no other company would ever invest on.

      Btw, you talk about NASA constellation project and others. The very reason US can bomb a terrorist hiding along Pakistan and Afghan border without significantly exposing human lives is because it has technologies, many of which originated from federal projects. This culture of innovation in US is what keeps it as the only super power, even when it almost produces Zilch, but still manages to control the top end of the innovation pyramid. If you want an example of capitalism gone wrong, just have a look at US health care. 3.8 trillion dollar of spending on health-care spending in 2008 alone, but its still the shabbiest thing I have even seen ever.

  16. web browsing in less developed areas by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

    It has a solar power option too, which is important in India's less developed areas,

    I predict that the added cost of the satellite phone link up will be a show stopper.

    1. Re:web browsing in less developed areas by BangaIorean · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, this might sound paradoxical, but actually, even 'less developed areas' in India have cellphone connectivity. Those backward areas have patchy electricity supply - the power goes off for almost 10-15 hours per day, on average, in some backward areas. But there is hardly any part of the country that is not covered by GSM cellphones. Sounds paradoxical, but that's how it is - almost everyone carries a phone. Given that, I guess they'll browse through the GSM signal...

  17. Part Cost != Sale Cost by nweaver · · Score: 1

    I can easily believe that they could get the bill of materials cost down to $35, but...

    That doesn't mean it costs $35: manufacturing adds a lot. The cheapest mobile phone (which has roughly the same part cost except the screen is VASTLY cheaper) is still $50 unsubsidized.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Uhm... Maybe in the States with a very messed up mobile phone market...

      I know you can get Nokias for under 30 bucks...

      http://direct.tesco.com/q/R.209-1392.aspx - alcatel do one for 15 bucks. Bluetooth, Colour screen... This is with the manufacturer and the store making a profit.

      Don't think profit is the driver on this project though.

    2. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No the cheapest mobile phone here in india is Rs 900 ~ 18$

    3. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      They'll be making a loss at that price, though. They'll make their profit from the cost of the calls. You can't do that trick with a computer.

    4. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by sznupi · · Score: 1

      $17, with not only the screen VASTLY cheaper...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can easily believe that they could get the bill of materials cost down to $35, but...

      That doesn't mean it costs $35: manufacturing adds a lot.

      Manufacturing is really cheap if they outsource it to India. Oh, wait...

    6. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      You can easily find basic prepaid phones in the US for $20 or less. That said, I too am skeptical about this.

    7. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      Don't think profit is the driver on this project though.

      Excellent point kind of like the purpose of nuclear power plants produce weapons grade fuel... or excuse me produce clean power or corn subsidies was to win the cold war... err... I mean help farm families, damn the consequences. etc. If this government program is designed to uplift a certain segment of their population in order to fight foreign threats perceived or real they will make it work. To all those in other countries who say they want one they are probably not to interested in bringing it to other markets. Plus if this product is their baseline that everyone can afford then the competition starts with whatever is "better than" this baseline.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    8. Re:Part Cost != Sale Cost by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Uhm... The phone isn't locked. You can use it with ANY sim card... I bought a slightly more expensive one on the same kind of deal (nice little touchscreen samsumg) when I lost a phone travelling and still had my SIM.

  18. Hey, guess what...? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    I bet a lot of Indian kids would be ecstatically happy with Best Buy home theater, as would YOU if you had nothing else.

    --
    No sig today...
  19. Inevitable by symes · · Score: 1

    The way things are going it is only a matter of time before we start to see interactive packaging - and therefore greater penetration by advertisers...

    1. Re:Inevitable by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Funny

      I already feel quite penetrated by advertisers. I don't think I can handle "greater penetration"

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  20. India Tablets: One Man's Story by Robotron23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I found myself having fainted for dehydration outside a small village in Uttar Pradesh. I came to but was apparantly delirious, blathering wildly about my deadlines - but it was my gestures which were to change my life from there on. My hands, so used to typing out at the desk, had begun to reanact keystrokes in the same manner as the fellow who plays Mozart's hands dash across the pianoforte keys in Amadeus.

    A peasent stumbled across my slumped corpse; he last asked me what I was doing in a business suit in the glaring heat of the northern hemisphere in late June (this was about a month ago) . Fortunately he had water, and was able to drag me in to a nearby village. I apparantly spoke about all sorts of computing stuff. I even confessed I dreamt I left comments on tech sites but woke up of course to find none - sombrely the young man, a mere kid in his 20s, got up and left without even a word.

    The man knew what was up; after my delirium had passed and I was coherant - a small, $35 Indian Tablet Computer lay infront of me. 'It is the best thing we can do instead of a keyboard' - said Ranvir, who had taken the exact funds from my wallet in exchange for it in the local tech market close to the Ganges. It was then my capitalist attitude morphed into a centre-left smorgasbord from a simple act of kindness. Of course it didn't make economic sense to rescue my incapicitated husk...it did not square with the Rand stuff I'd worshipped so libertarianistically.

    Upon squaring together an Internet connection with mere gaffer tape and a mini-co axial carefully hammered into the 3.5mm audio jack...I was on. The world opened up, and as I sat in that little squalid shack which was my temporary home...blogging became something completely new. The egoistic, day-to-day mundane became the selfless and vivid recollection of events in the village who had granted me honorary citizen status. I got to know what broadband would feel like at 56k speed, but not due to poor latency...but instead economy components. Upon blogging my experience with the good samaritan and the villagers, a commenter posted:

    "Hey man you should be like the chieftain or leader or some crap? Lead these folks into a revolutionary tech thing! -- Lance"

    It was that night that I near-emptied my bank account buying 200 Tablets at $35 - that's $7000 bucks. I gave a tablet to every villager bar a few spares. It was then I set about making speeches about online rights. Having educated the villagers to open source rights, technology issues, we set about changing the world. Our first stop was a pilgrimage to the Nepalese steppes to sabotage a Dalai Lama press conference for publicity, but as about fifty of us packed up to go I received a call from David in editorial back home - my HTC Android! It was still on!

    "Pete? Pete. Hi we need you back here in England as soon as possible there's a few urgents things to cover. Can you fly back tomorrow afternoon?"

    A tear had already dropped from my face to the Tablet on the nearby bed. Two villagers had entered and were looking at me intently as I had my conversation in English: "Yeah, yeah I can make it...can you wire some cash over; I had some unexpected expenses and..."

    Dave was in a hurry and brusque: "Okay, money will be in your account within a few hours. Be back here Tuesday morning - deadlines to fill and all that. Your computer has been pining for you I swear....later man."

    Tablet PCs in India changed my life, and though my plans to become the head of a village failed and the depression built upon leaving...the experience shall never leave me.

    1. Re:India Tablets: One Man's Story by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      You are a satirical bastard with too much talent.

      Thanks for the enjoyable read.

      -FL

    2. Re:India Tablets: One Man's Story by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been to rural Indian villages. If you give these guys computers, most of them will sell them to buy new axles for their ox carts or whatever. Most of these people can't read, so what could they do with a computer?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:India Tablets: One Man's Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their kids will probably figure it out and teach one another.

    4. Re:India Tablets: One Man's Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does this mean J. Peterman will be carrying these

    5. Re:India Tablets: One Man's Story by tiks · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting that there is a big portion of population in India that lives in rural/small town . The penetration of education till high school even tho weak (in villages) & not well managed but DOES exists. I can see tonnes of uses for something like this in such areas. These people are too poor to get full blown computers but they are not so stupid to not realize the value of education. This one device can potentially replace a plethora of textbooks a poor kid has to carry (or does not has access to) to get to school in a nearby village. This has a potential of turning into a mass scale e-book distribution mechanism. My only concern is about the chances of actually hitting that price target (or ballpark). It seems too low for a device like that. In any case if they do I'll personally buy a bunch to donate.

      --
      We are always correct.. even when we realize we were wrong.
  21. All these tablet stories... by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whether they're Android, Meego, Win7, whatever.

    I can't be the only one that's tired of hearing about them. And I'm willing to bet that the majority of them will never be in production.

    Then again, I'm firmly in the netbook camp, so a tablet wouldn't appeal to me.

    1. Re:All these tablet stories... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I'm firmly in the "if it can fit in a backpack, it's not a computer" camp, and now you know what it was like for us to deal with all the stories about retarded netbooks for years on end.

    2. Re:All these tablet stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? I fit my laptop with its 17.3” 1600x900 display into a backpack and took it on an airplane, and it’s no retarded netbook...

    3. Re:All these tablet stories... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      A tablet computer is just a smartphone with a bigger screen.

      The majority of them are already in production.

    4. Re:All these tablet stories... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      This isn't a tablet story, it's a OLPC story. And with the Indian government's backing, it'll probably really be put into production.

      A $35 tablet would be nice... Just needs a $5 keyboard.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:All these tablet stories... by selven · · Score: 1

      $35 tablet + $15 USB keyboard = $50 netbook-like thing.

  22. Re:Here we go again. by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can get a second-hand tablet for how much?

    I scored an X41 Tablet for about $150 total, with two worn batteries and a busted up stylus. Not a touch screen, but a tablet. Works fine, but that's not $35. I spend more than that for the recovery disk set. Yes, I am that obsessed.

    For even $100, this gives Negroponte's dream a run for the money.

    India strives for self-sufficiency. It;s not cheap to them, it's affordable and sustainable.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  23. Why computers? by actionbastard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When the average annual salary in India is approximately $500US? They would do far better applying their talents to eliminating hunger and poverty amongst their people than applying them to cheap computers.

    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:Why computers? by pankajmay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      True. But how do you eliminate hunger and poverty?

      The middle-class in India thinks it is by education. Which happens to be largely correct. Poverty and hunger are not isolated problems individually, they are usually the result of:
      • Extreme crunch on resources and intense competition. (Remember this is the second most populous nation on this earth and smaller in size than USA)
      • Social factors (Yes, untouchability; caste system, which are still a big problem in rural India)

      How would you then eliminate those? By providing opportunities; by opening up avenues; by making people aware that the world has a lot of other things which they can explore to realize, recognize their own talents, and empower themselves. So these kind of computer/technology distribution helps. Maybe not directly, but surely in a forceful way.

      Hey, I would say that if India does manage to get it out of the marketing hype, this should be mass-produced, (maybe talents from here in USA can make it even more better by applying current advances) and sold universally to every country where people struggle.

    2. Re:Why computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Indeed, why? Use your brains motherfucker.

      1) Do not measure everything in Daaaaalarrrrrs. Get out of your American Pond. 500 Daaaalarrrs is equal to around 23000 rupees, which is enough to keep one decently clothed and fed, in INDIA, with INDIA's costs of living.

      2) Developing technology and putting money in technology is the greatest way of creating jobs and reducing poverty. Are you one of those douchebags that wave placards against NASA?

    3. Re:Why computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the average annual salary in India is approximately $500US? They would do far better applying their talents to eliminating hunger and poverty amongst their people than applying them to cheap computers.

      Yes, let us stop all other forms of progress till poverty and hunger is eradicated completely. Hey, why fund NASA? There are still poor people in the US. There is still hunger.

      Also, the whole world doesn't revolve around the dollar. Its a meaningless measure until you tell us what $1 can buy in India (here is a hint: more than you can buy in the US).

    4. Re:Why computers? by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      I don't know... indians who work on computers don't seem to starve. So this might be a good move.

    5. Re:Why computers? by kgskgs · · Score: 1

      I was searching for the whole thread for a comment talking about how India should focus on hunger and poverty. While I almost could not find one and about to believe that the attitudes of US/Europe towards India (and developing world in general )are changing, I came across this one.

      No one disagrees that hunger and poverty should be eliminated. The question is how. And Indian and other governments are doing this because they believe that this is the best way to eliminate poverty for long term.

      Let me give you an example what tremendous revolution Internet and IT can bring to the life of the poor. In India there is an act called REGA. Rural Employment Guarantee Act. According to this act, if a rural person shows up at the doorsteps of REGA office and asks for job, he or she must be given a job for at least 15 days of the month. These jobs are usually day labor jobs on government construction projects, but still provide people some means to survive.

      Unfortunately this law has become hotbed of corruption. Officers take your application, give you job for 15 days then tell you not to come on job. While you don't show up, the records still you are coming on job and are being paid cash. The money goes into officer's pocket.

      With a recent initiative, Indian government streamlined this process. They made all these details computerized, identified by a persistent job card number, and made the data available online. Anyone, just by typing their jobcard number can see how much money was paid on their jobcard record. I know of an NGO that made arrangements with a cyber cafe in a adjacent town and arranged one printout of jobcard per person every month.

      Previously people just knew that there is come corruption, but no one did anything about it. But now when you see your jobcard is been misused, and you see the money that should be paid to you is gone in someone else's pocket, suddenly it is personal. This resulted in people marching on local office with sticks and stones and literally beating up the corrupt officer.

      Contrary to the popular belief, lack of money or lack of food or lack of water is not the issue. Management of these resources is the major issue. And Internet/ IT/Technology has huge role to play here.

    6. Re:Why computers? by BangaIorean · · Score: 1

      The annual salary in India per capita, on a PPP basis is close to $3000 per annum in PPP terms. In nominal terms too, it's around $1050. Check : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India

      Which is still pretty bad, but not as bad as generally perceived :-)

  24. Re:Here we go again. by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you need to keep yourself better informed.

    Firstly, the salary for an IT job in India is somewhere around 15-20% what it is here in the UK - even so, someone on that salary in India is earning a good wage. It therefore makes sense that electronics goods would also be proportionately priced.

    Secondly, there is a stronger cultural link between wealth and status in India - a man on a high salary will have have no shortage of potential wives knocking at his door - but they are also less materialistic than us. Therefore, the importance you and I might place on the functionality of a device is perhaps less important to an Indian. So please don't judge everyone else by our standards.

    Thirdly, India is not known for exporting high-tech goods to the West, it is a country aimed at providing a cheaper-to-hire English-speaking service industry workforce to the West. And because I detect some sour grapes over outsourcing in the tone of your message, please target your wrath at the rich Western CEOs pocketing the cost differential between hiring staff in the USA or Europe than in India - after all, if somebody offered you a higher paid job than what you're in at the moment, you'd at least consider it even if you didn't take it. So why should anyone in India be any different?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  25. If outsourcing to India has taught me anything... by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Funny

    If outsourcing has taught me anything, this is going to BSOD unless you follow the step-by-step script that comes with the tablet.

  26. Controversial by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    That's a highly novel approach to economics. I wonder if they're even breaking even cost of production. Regardless, someone (the workers) is getting paid well below the minimum wage (if at all :). The provision of subsidies and this particular approach to education by the government is debatable at best in a country where would be much better suited for fixing railways and eliminating poverty.

  27. Re:Here we go again. by BangaIorean · · Score: 1

    Someone mod parent up!

  28. Probably garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably underpowered and mostly useless. Kind of like the piece of shit Cisco 851 we sent back last week.

  29. At $35 a piece... by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Compare to this which is at $85 in volume without shipping, I'm not sure how it can get the cost down to $10. Some very cheap ARM with integrated flash/ram still cost $10.

    1. Re:At $35 a piece... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how it can get the cost down to $10.

      They outsource manufacturing to China.

    2. Re:At $35 a piece... by mrawhimskell · · Score: 1

      The government will subsidize the cost. I don't expect it to cost $35 overseas. The aim is to get it into the colleges and villages.

  30. Competition by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    Is that some sort of competition with China on who can pay their workers the lowest salary?

  31. $100 floor by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    This is wonderful. Talk about crashing through the $100 floor. Was nice when desktops smashed through the $1000 floor.

    And there's still much waste in PC design. Look at the size of an average notebook versus a typical desktop, There's huge overprovisioning everywhere in the desktop. Computers have been in our faces for so long that we're not only accustomed to them taking substantial space, we practically demand it. Admit it, contemptuous thoughts about slowness, limitations, and compromises flit through our minds whenever we contemplate a PC that doesn't occupy a sizable tower. Someday towers will look as clunky as those 1970s Heathkit calculators that were almost the size of a shoe box and for input had basically the numeric keypad used on keyboards for desktop computers.

    Even the typical netbook could be smaller. For instance, if the power consumption could be lowered even further, perhaps by running recent CPUs under 1GHz, then the power supply could be smaller, and maybe cooling fans could be omitted, saving even more space and power, and eliminating the biggest source of noise, and an expensive component. There is still much PC functionality split among many separate chips. I'm guessing these are some of what they're doing to ultimately get down to $10.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:$100 floor by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And there's still much waste in PC design. Look at the size of an average notebook versus a typical desktop, There's huge overprovisioning everywhere in the desktop. Computers have been in our faces for so long that we're not only accustomed to them taking substantial space, we practically demand it.

      That space directly translates into sturdiness. Laptops overheat and die sooner than desktops, unless the desktops are packed tight like laptops (iMacs) then the desktops die sooner.

    2. Re:$100 floor by rotide · · Score: 1

      PC's are built using standard form factors. This allows PC's to have parts easily changed out and/or replaced. Crunching it down as tight as possible would eliminate a lot of choices for upgrades and probably just make it a proprietary device with proprietary components. If that's what you're after, there are many proprietary choices on the market today.

    3. Re:$100 floor by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      There are at least 2 ways to deal with heat problems: more space for fans and heatsinks and such like active methods, and slower operation. It's a tradeoff, and we've always been high on the performance side, feeling that the performance boost was worth the space, expenses and noise of active air cooling. In effect, we've demanded that manufacturers routinely overclock, and add active air cooling to handle the additional heat. I suppose water cooling hasn't caught on more because it's much more expensive for the slight performance boost it makes possible over active air, and what if the system springs a leak? Then there's the mineral oil bath. Beyond that is liquid nitrogen and even overclockers stop short of that.

      Laptops wouldn't come near to burning laps and dying early if they weren't built to push their performance limits.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  32. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not OK to talk about prototypes without providing pictures. Not OK.

  33. Waste of money. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1, Troll

    If this thing truly costs $35 it's likely not much better than a calculator. Anything more than that and it didn't actually cost $35. Either someone's eating the cost or the government is subsidizing it.

    And for this sort of thing it's always smarter and cheaper to go with something off the shelf. The money wasted on the OLPC project would have been better finding an existing cheap computer. Better yet, that money should have been used improving the quality of schools and education. Computers aren't some kind of panacea. Internet access isn't some kind of magical wonder that will provide instant education. It's not going to help at all if you don't know what you're looking for. From my experience the first thing everyone goes for is social networking. You could drop a dead computer in front of a kid and they'll start playing with it instead of paying attention.

    India would be better served buying $50-$100 desktops and keeping them locked away in labs at school and used only for computer-specific classes. Computers are awesome tools with a ton of potential when applied correctly. Otherwise they're nothing but a massive and expensive distraction which I'm convinced which I'm far more likely to be a distraction in the classroom.

    1. Re:Waste of money. by rotide · · Score: 1

      Exactly, why innovate or come up with new ideas when there are old things that could potentially do the same thing! You're seriously arguing that they should be purchasing $50-100 desktops and locking them up instead of spreading around $35 ultra portable tablets?

    2. Re:Waste of money. by dooode · · Score: 1

      I both agree and disagree.

      If I get something like this for $35 (~ cost of 3 or 4 books in India) I won't mind buying one and storing PDF files on them.

      In worst case, efforts like these push prices down and forces manufacturers to be creative and innovative. For instance, after Tata Nano's success Indians have had many more options, as almost everyone is competing for a small car. Even though Nano's prices have moved up a bit, others have come down "drastically". And that's kind of cool...

      Last but not the least, instead of just providing cheap services or manufacturing cheap stuff for their American counterparts, efforts like these help countries like India and China move up the innovation pyramid.

    3. Re:Waste of money. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If this thing truly costs $35 it's likely not much better than a calculator. Anything more than that and it didn't actually cost $35. Either someone's eating the cost or the government is subsidizing it.

      In the early nineties I had a Sun 4/260 (I upgraded from 3/260) for the nerd cachet of it, and just to learn SunOS. It had 24MB of RAM and the CPU ran at 16.67 MHz. It had an 8 bit dumb framebuffer, and ran SunOS 4.1.3u1 IIRC. On my 512MB SCSI disk I managed to get the full OS, GNU userland and toolchain, xv image viewer, Netscape, and so on. Probable specs for this hardware involve a 300MHz ARM, probably also with a dumb frame buffer, with 64MB RAM and at least 512MB of flash storage. Further, it will probably have 802.11b or possibly even G (but why?) WiFi and USB 2 OTG, and a flash memory slot of some kind, I would guess MicroSD push-pull (no spring clip mechanism.) And you have the gall to suggest that this is too little machine to do actual work? All it really has to do is stream low-quality video and audio, and do email and IM. Well, and websurf, but if the education sites are designed to be lightweight then this device will be able to fulfill its design function.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Waste of money. by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. To go along with this, India needs to make sure the target applications will work (eg. video playback, ebook or whatever reading) and probably will need to make special portals on the internet to get special content for it in ways that are sympathetic to the device and to the network. Maybe even deploy more powerful servers to schools to cache content at the edge. The device is hardly useless just because it can't run the latest microsoft bloatware. And if we want to raise hackers, I don't see why the hardware limitations of the machine should seriously impede the programming learning experience. Look at what Turing had to work with, I can't see his Mom bitching that young Alan never got to learn excel like "proper" computer users.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  34. creepy by Nadaka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it just me or does that guy look really, really creepy?

    http://androidos.in/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/android-tablet-india-1.jpg

    1. Re:creepy by naz404 · · Score: 1

      No, you're just racist.

    2. Re:creepy by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to agree with naz404; the guy in the picture looks normal, you're probably just creeped out easily by brown folk.

    3. Re:creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he drives a beige Toyota very slowly and hits a lot of other cars in parking lots, stinks of curry, can't think outside the box to save his life, and has never bathed or brushed his teeth ever: aka like every other indian on the planet.

  35. resistive touch by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    at that price it's resistive touch. if you wanted a palm pilot you can pick one up on ebay for about $20.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:resistive touch by dooode · · Score: 1

      Yes you are right, but that's at ebay. I gave away my Palm for free to a friend...

      The average price of Palm is still around $150+
      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Palm&x=0&y=0

    2. Re:resistive touch by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Informative

      When we talk about a $35 tablet computer, "average price" is not even remotely in the picture. It makes no sense for you to compare averages when we're talking about something extreme.

      Don't like ebay? Palm IIIx runs for about $25 at Goodwill. $20 on Craigslist. And $15 at Weirdstuff(and places like it). But I don't know why you don't like ebay, there are a couple IIIx in good shape for $7 on there right now.

      Here's a $75 Palm m500 on the same site you linked. Prefer color and WinCE? Dell Axim x51 runs for about $60 these days, which is coincidentally roughly what it would cost wholesale to produce with the same specs.

      I have some idea what this stuff costs from working on the Kindle and other products, especially given that I actively tried to put together a minimalist low-cost tablet/ereader project. It is quite possible to get to a $35 BOM on a tablet computer, but I it won't be a very modern style tablet. sub-500MHz ARM9, no 3D acceleration, 128MB or less RAM, slow flash interface, poor battery life, not multi-touch, and the list goes on. I think with the right software it could be a practical gadget for the right purposes. But most people scoffed at me when I have proposed these kinds of minimalist devices at the places I've worked.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:resistive touch by dooode · · Score: 1

      Well you are right. It's not magic after all :)

      I am assuming assembling cost in India would be extremely low owing to the difference in labor cost. If Government is involved, the project can get breaks from import/export duties for parts. And since Indian Govt is involved, suppliers would also give deep discounts sniffing large orders.

      I would be actually happy if these are not high ends. Their goal is not to replace Ipads but to be present as a cheap alternative for Montessori kids who would like to know more about computers and basically learn from it.

      There was a similar drive in around 2000, when IISC (a university in India) produced "Simputer" a very early stage handheld device. It was supposed to be a cheap Linux-based device, and at that time it was way better than most palms. Unfortunately, Simputers shifted its focus to more and more advanced features. They are still way better than many Palms I have used. But they are almost dead.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simputer

    4. Re:resistive touch by brasselv · · Score: 1

      but I it won't be a very modern style tablet. [...] most people scoffed at me when I have proposed these kinds of minimalist devices at the places I've worked.

      People scoffed at netbooks too, circa 2007 ("Who wants a toy with 1Gb RAM, even if cheap?")

      Problem is, scoffers / decision makers often have the latest-gadget-bias, i.e. the majority of them has the iPhone (n) when others are still quite happy with iPhone (n-2). Can I do my email? Can I surf the Web? Well, that's what me-average-joe is happy with.

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    5. Re:resistive touch by bazorg · · Score: 1
      All those nice products from the 90's are probably correctly priced but still lack the 5" (or 7 "or 9") screen, a valid web browser and wi-fi. Last time I looked, reading PDFs on a Palm machine was not that practical. Even if there was a 7" screen Palm Tungsten it would be a bit on the primitive side when compared to a Linux tablet, especially if the operating system is loaded from a SD card.

      I enjoyed using the Palm machines back in the day, but this is a different story and certainly better value for money than buying obsolete PDAs in used condition.

      I'm calling some Indian friends so they can bring some next time they drop by :)

    6. Re:resistive touch by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      The Kindle is a Linux tablet. And it is also a bit primitive, and quite expensive.

      There is WikiReader (about $100). It is quite basic and serves a very specific purpose. I doubt it will every catch on as a product, but I agree with the spirit of the thing.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  36. Hmm by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Build a prototype mock-up.
    2. Hold press conference about a $35 tablet running Linux.
    3. Wait for Microsoft to offer $$$ to switch to Windows.
    4. Profit
    ??

    1. Re:Hmm by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Foreign Corrupt Practices Act friendly wintel tablet for $34.50 in 3,2,1 ...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Hmm by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Not funny, Insightful.

      Look at what happened to OLPC. It was gonna be a cheap, linux-only, open platform to enable learning in disadvantaged locations. Suddenly MS got scared, and decided to <i>magnanimously</i> offer free Windows licences, and even hacked a version that would run on the low-end hardware.

      How long will it be until they make India an offer they can't refuse, based on <i>charitably</i> offfering free licences for a suitable Windows version; and, you know, we should really stick a date on that price renegotiation meeting for all your gubment servers.

      Had I gods, I'd pray for them to give the Indian government the balls they're gonna need in the near future.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  37. Re:Later that day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard the Chevy Nova sold poorly in English-speaking countries because nobody wanted a car named after an exploding star.

  38. Best Computer Ever by ctchristmas · · Score: 1

    Somehow I feel like the computer will be similar to the computer in the south park episode The Day the Internet Stood Still. For those of you who haven't seen it, the men get their porn fix by taking turns looking at a computer that is actually a cardboard box with a guy inside drawing pictures on a piece of paper and holding them up to a cutout in the box.

    1. Re:Best Computer Ever by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Many a true word spoken in jest... I don't suppose you've ever seen NPRQuake have you?

      Jeez, I cannot believe it's not been updated in 8 years!!!

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  39. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the Crysis benchmark?

  40. I can bet you can run Flash on it by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is, it will likely have "gnash" installed/enabled as you can really do some education software easily with Flash. Lots of "kids games" too.
    As there is no "h264" etc. involved, I am sure gnash will have no problem.
    Of course, if dinosaur Adobe wakes up and codes the actual Flash platform for it, it would be better. Now that would be some real thing to do against Apple, rather than blog-trolling :)

  41. Fool me once... by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is wonderful. Talk about crashing through the $100 floor.

    Or not. Last year, Indian officials announced a $10 laptop for the masses, which turned out to be much more than $10, and nowhere close to a laptop.

    I wouldn't expect much from their "$35 tablet" announced when the OLPC XO-3 tablet is getting some attention.

  42. Nano explodes driven off dealers lot by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Who could forget quality control gem?

    1. Re:Nano explodes driven off dealers lot by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The second-worst quality-control aspect in that story is the headline. "Tata Nano Goes Up in Flames With Passenger and Driver Inside" very strongly implies they were immolated along with the vehicle. You'd have to somehow show me that "goes up in flames" has been used as a synonym for "catches fire" rather than "is consumed by fire", which is the only sense I've ever seen, to rationalize that sensationalistic usage. Article goes up in flames with author inside.

    2. Re:Nano explodes driven off dealers lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot statistics: 1 data point

  43. Keyboard by metrometro · · Score: 1

    USB port = keyboard?

    If so, I'm buying one.

  44. Same hardware cost as iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people see $35 and think it will be crap?

    Because you automatically compare it to the iPad without thinking?

    The iPad "hardware" probably costs around $35 too. Just because Apple "charges" over $400, that doesn't actually have any correlation with hardware costs.

    1. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      You couldn't even buy half a iPad display for $35. A quick google search reveals the price to manufacture an iPod around $260.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Oops, last "iPod" should also read "iPad".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Well, when flash drives alone can cost more than $35...

    4. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      That's because of the typical NIH syndrome. Anything NOT made in America by americans is immediately bad, however good it is. Remember the old jokes about Soviet union: "The soviets can never pack a nuke into a suitcase, because they haven't perfected the suitcase yet." It ended when Soviet Union sent up Sputnik,

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    5. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by oztiks · · Score: 1

      *Bullshit* *Cough* *Cough*

      If you buy 1 it might cost you $260, you by 500,000 units it costs to $10 maybe even $5 or $2 a screen.

      A $35 laptop is VERY possible and can hold the same quality as a shiny Apple iPad when you break it down into units. India is a great place for this to begin simply from the fact their manufacturing costs will be low but _they_ still walk away with a sizable profit.

      Apple is just like every other "Reseller" not vendor RESELLER. They take bits from everywhere else at a massive unit rate, assemble it in sweatshops like Foxconn for nothing, ship and sell it a with a massive markup with govt taxes and all. How do you think Apple made it successful? it certainly wasn't by offering their technology at a fair prices

      The only successful vendor to do this (i can only thing of one) is Microsoft and they got away with selling their components at stupid prices. Windows could of been sold at $20 a pop and Microsoft would of been the size of every other vendor out there, nope sell it for the maximum and become a giant.

      Apple's done that on the manufacturing and reseller front. Take the Dell approach of sales and milk it 2x 3x what they did, splash a bit of marketing into the mix and *BOOM* a winning formula for an IT giant.

      The problem is its like the same problem the American Military has, show these 3rd world countries how to do war then they start taking shots at the people who taught them in the 1st place. Developing nations are now doing the same with IT and they'll undercut the crap out of their American mentors.

    6. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, remind us how that whole Cold War turned out for Russia again, I can't recall...

      The great "Space Race" is what ended the Soviet Union. They tried to match spending with the US and could only sustain that for so long before collapsing under it's own inefficiency.

    7. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will India's cost to manufacture be any lower than China's where there are already manufactured? You can only pay the workers so little and I think China may have India beat already in that regard.

      And Dell doesn't make that much on their hardware systems. One of my good friends is an executive at Dell and the only reason they make a profit at all is because of the shear volume the sell to businesses. The markups on their machines is very small.

    8. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because unsustainable spending has worked out so well for the US...

    9. Re:Same hardware cost as iPad by oztiks · · Score: 1

      Dell is a different story, Dell buys complete components from vendors. I.E a whole monitor, then takes the label off and puts the Dell logo in its place.

      Dell elcheapo printers are just Lexmark printers with a different banner.

      With Apple nobody can really speculate on the costs, even industry pros have no clue as to the agreements Apple has with its suppliers but I can guarantee a couple of chip-sets and un-powered LCD screens will cost significantly less, especially if they are un-fitted components in a large shipping container vs a QC product with packaging, user manuals and warranties enclosed.

      Knowing the exact price of an iDevice is next to impossible. It would be strictly eyes only information done at the highest levels of Apple, as it should be, it would be massive trade secret.

  45. And the final cost is... by no1home · · Score: 1

    350USD in any fully capitalistic society- lots of middlemen to pay for shipping, receiving, smog tests, etc.

    (Before you complain, yes, I love capitalism. But I am also aware of its limitations.)

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
  46. How it works by Subm · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTA: Mamta Varma, a ministry spokeswoman, said falling hardware costs and intelligent design make the price tag plausible.

    Through divine providence, I sadly predict this product will sell well in the United States, especially among the non-technical.

  47. Where by $35 they mean $135 by melted · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I'll believe it when I see it selling for this much and when Engadget publishes a review. Until then it's a figment of their imagination.

  48. Re:Here we go again. by blueZ3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It;s not cheap to them, it's affordable and sustainable.

    I think you mean imaginary and not-probable.

    Nothing against this specific device, but this is another one of those tired stories (much like the XO... and how did that pan out?) about how <entity name> is going to produce this amazing new gadget with <specs> for only <price>. Usually, when the pipe dream hoopla is over and the actual product ships, it turns out that the specs given are wildly overstated and/or the price originally "guestimated" is about 20% of what the device actually winds up costing.

    Anyone can build a prototype gadget and pull some production cost numbers out of their hindquarters. What really matters is if those numbers are at all realistic. In this case (again, much like the XO) the numbers (2 GB RAM, 9" display, $35 price) don't seem to add up.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  49. Sure, wake me up when it's real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because the Indian government says they can make it for $35 doesn't make it possible. Note that they have not yet built one in volume and are looking for turn-key mfgrs in Taiwan. The ministry of education may have political reasons for making the announcement.

  50. Batteries not included? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Maybe it will just run on regular (user-supplied) AA cells, whether rechargeable or not. And while we're speculating wildly, the expected running time on regular cells may not be very good...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  51. "An earlier cheap laptop ... came to nothing." by gaiageek · · Score: 1

    From the BBC News article on the topic: "An earlier cheap laptop plan by the same ministry came to nothing."

    From my limited experience traveling in India, trying to get a new power adapter for my laptop and being told "Yes, no problem, we'll have it on Tuesday!" only to call on Wenesday and be told "Yes, it's on the way, we'll have it on Monday!" and then never getting said power adapter (this same experience happening more than once), all I can say is I'll believe it when I see it - and I'm not expecting to see it.

  52. Re:Here we go again. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "Again India, they try to produce super cheap stuff nobody real wants."

    Never mind their rapidly expanding auto parts industry (for example). :)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  53. Re:Here we go again. by spazdor · · Score: 1

    It sucks that this comment is only allowed to go to +5. I think it should be a "sticky" post at the top of basically every Slashdot story that mentions India.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  54. wait, whose grapes are sour? by beanluc · · Score: 1

    because I detect some sour grapes over outsourcing in the tone of your message, please target your wrath at the rich Western CEOs [pocket] the cost differential

    First of all, how is THAT *not* sour grapes over outsourcing?

    Second of all, you're imagining quite a laughable scenario.

    You're assuming that if the differential didn't exist, all other things would nevertheless remain equal.

    That the CEOs would otherwise spend the money on the high priced laborers anyway.
    That the CEOs would charge the same price for the goods and services their companies produce anyway, though their labor costs are much higher.
    That the companies would actually have the money to pay the CEOs an amount that is equal to what the "cost differential" would have been if it had existed.
    That the customers would have the money to pay for this company's goods and services at the same volume which would have been possible, had this pricing efficiency in labor existed for all participants in the Western or global economy.

    Inefficiency affects everybody. Outsourcing makes the whole pie bigger, not just the CEO's slice.

    --
    Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
    1. Re:wait, whose grapes are sour? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      My own personal experience of it is that it hasn't worked.

      The Indian staff that have been added to my team as consultants are hard working, interested & well educated - but in my particular technical consultancy role, previous experience is very important but they lack that experience.

      They were also put into the team without any consultation with me, yet for any interviewees in the UK, I or another of the senior consultants are asked to technically vet them in a separate short interview.

      Furthermore, my role is specifically based around security on application servers built on Linux and Solaris - yet it took my having to speak to their manager to get the Indian guys put on their *FIRST* Linux course after they had been put into their roles.

      The whole purpose of them being there is for me to handover some work to them and for me to be their technical lead. However, I do not have the bandwidth to mentor them because I am too busy on some major projects for large clients. Yet whoever put these guys in the roles did not think about their current technical skills or allocate any additional resource to get them trained so that they can assist me effectively.

      Again, I don't blame them one bit but would dearly like to find out the name of the senior person who organised this - it was badly thought out and done purely as a cost-saving exercise without thinking about the additional time and training expense these guys need to effectively speak to my clients.

      So please don't give me the "outsourcing corporate speak" - the same people who use that speak are the people who make the decisions about it in the first place and leave the front-line people like me having to try to sort their crap out.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  55. Ugh, netbooks... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Tablets are less useful than netbooks, but netbooks are all the disadvantages a laptop and a PDA have between each other, wrapped into one device:

    From the PDA:

    - Small keyboard
    - Small screen
    - Little processing power / memory
    - Limited to non-existent ports/external media options

    From the laptop:

    - Can't make cellular calls, headset required for VoIP
    - Can't fit in your pocket
    - Requires lap/desk space for comfortable use
    - No touchscreen
    - Only a shitty front-facing webcam

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  56. At that price, it don't run Windows... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Another UI "revolution" that is happening without Microsoft because, while the shareholders won't stand for it, Microsoft's own accountants are legally obligated to NOT approve the expenditures for it. Talk about getting squeezed between Scylla and Charibdes.

    As a technology user, (I'm now out of development or even management,) I'm a bit of an Apple Fanboy, but I also like Linux and would definitely want one.

    I wish them all the success in overcoming the scaling obstacles they're going to encounter.

    Hooray!

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:At that price, it don't run Windows... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Um, there have been Windows tablets for a very long time. I had a couple that had 486 chips in them running windows 3.1, so don't act like a good little Apple fanboy and think Apple came up with it. There have been many that were far more useful for approximately 20 years now. The problem is, no one wanted a fully functional tablet computer until Apple made a limited functionality tablet computer and made it look pretty.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  57. Incredibles by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    Simply not feasible, even at fully-marginal cost and with developing-world resource costs. Wake me when they've found a manufacturer who can actually deliver at these unit-prices, then does so in volume without other sweeteners.

  58. OH NOES RESISTIVE TOUCH! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with resistive touch?

    It's more accurate than capacitive touch and has none of the drawbacks. Multi-touch silliness might not be possible, but is that important?

    I chose my latest PDA in part because it had resistive rather than capacitive touch.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  59. Link to buy now? by rhinokitty · · Score: 1

    Karma to the first person to submit a link to where you can actually order one. When do they go on sale?

  60. Re:Here we go again. by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    I didn't say I liked outsourcing & I've lost some good work colleagues as a result of it - but I'm not going to blame it on Indian people who ultimately just want to earn a decent livelihood like the rest of us.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  61. Wrong episode name by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    That episode was called Over Logging:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over_Logging

    Fun fact: In the episode "You have 0 friends" you can spot Kenny using what is clearly an OLPC in the background (in the very first scene IIRC). I lol'd when I saw that XD

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  62. What you don't realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) this is government propaganda - it'll never come to fruition but it gives a worm feeling to it's citizens

    2) $35 is cost of major parts - manufacturing, case/packaging, software, batteries are *extra*

    3) $35 is based on assumptions on parts cost a year from now

  63. Carts and Horses by motorhead · · Score: 0

    They don't have power (solar option) but they have Internet for web surfing and video conferencing?

    --
    Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
  64. Demonstration of the prototype by dooode · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to one of its demonstration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGYHH16XTks

    It appears reasonable at a level of a prototype. This dude says that it's available for $30 with $5 overheads. I kind of tend to believe him. It's way far from something like I-Pad. But at this price, if it works, I would call it cute.

    1. Re:Demonstration of the prototype by dooode · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am not sure if this the same. Sorry, if it is not.

      The news reports mentions about it being produced by academic institutions. It is common for them to have a partner company. But I am not 100% sure.

  65. $100 linux touch screen PC by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Mini2440 is $100 in quantity 50+, comes with Linux / Qtopia, 405 MHz ARM9 with a 3.5" LCD 240x320, 128MB NAND FLASH, Ethernet, USB (could put a thumb drive on here for more space), serial, microphone, headphone out audio, $15 webcam (quantity 50+).

  66. Re:Here we go again. by soppsa · · Score: 1

    but they are also less materialistic than us

    You clearly don't know enough Indians. They are about as materialistic as it gets.

  67. What is a Tablet Computer ? by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    Its basically a Netbook without a keyboard and track-pad attached. And unless there are optimizations to the OS (reduced complexity) then when in tablet mode you're going to be all over that screen - pointing - clicking - dragging - etc.

    I'm just saying that tossing a standard desktop OS on a tablets been done many times in the recent past (last decade) and they went nowhere. Cheap HW is great but you've got to have touch optimized OS and apps at a minimum or just go home. A recent lesson is HP dumping Win 7 for their Tablet PC in favor of Web OS by Palm.

    Our school is demo'ing some iPads this Summer and I've had one for a few weeks. I have to say that iOS 4.0 is very easy to use and the device makes a helluva reader. Along with my other eval work I'm reading my second 300 page sci-fi novel via iTunes iBook app --- very easy and natural to read and use. Now for sure there are some huge issues with how Apple has handled DRM on the iPad (via the iTunes control / tether) - and totally hiding any trace of the file system - folders - etc. But Apple got a lot right in a fully touch driven device.

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  68. Re:Here we go again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do YOU know about Indians, you wife beating child molesting Pakistani arsewipe! By the way, it was pretty ticklish to see you guys masquerade as Indians after the failed Times Square attack: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64655Y20100507

    Funny how you piglets turn up everywhere either to blow things up or troll web forums.

  69. Hope its a laptop by fly1ngtux · · Score: 1

    Being an Indian, I will be really proud of myself -- if this really happens. However, last time when they did some stunt like this, it turned out to be a USB stick or something similar.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Rs_500-laptop_display_on_Feb_3/articleshow/4049914.cms
    http://www.merinews.com/article/rs-500-laptop-is-not-a-laptop/15709651.shtml

    I sincerely hope that this time they won't repeat the same story.

  70. Simputer redux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that one?

  71. I'll believe it when I see it on store shelves by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I will believe it when I can actually buy one. Sorry, but I have seen sooo many article about the $100 dollar android tablet tablet from China, I just have to roll my eyes when I see this. These things seem to either not come out, or when they come out they are poor quality and/or cost way more than the $100-or-less, that was promised.

    BTW: India announced a $10 laptop in 2009, amazingly that never materialized.

    Despite the introduction of the latest tablet with much fanfare, India doesn't have a history of delivering on its much-hyped promises about electronic devices. For instance, Indian startup Notion Ink has been promising a tablet for months called Adam that is yet to hit the market. In February 2009, Indian government officials announced a $10 laptop that ultimately proved to be vaporware.

    http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/07/india-35-tablet/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+(Wired%3A+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))#ixzz0ubp1sW7f

  72. more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a part of a mission to share videos and lectures from best engineering schools in India(IIT's and IISc) to all other engineering schools in India

    see the link below to see the content being shared
    http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/
    this is the best of engineering education available online

    The same is available on youtube in the /iit channel

  73. Re:Here we go again. by kikito · · Score: 1

    "India is not known for exporting high-tech goods to the West"

    It is known however to announce great breakthrough technologies at very affordable cost ... that turn out being just vaporware.