Copyright Troll USCG Violates Copyright
omarlittle writes "The US Copyright Group — a company owned by intellectual property lawyers, which has been in the news for threatening downloaders of the movie Hurt Locker — has apparently stolen their site from a competitor. At one point, even the competitor's phone number and copyright statement were copied word for word on USCG's 'settlement' website. The competitor is reportedly going to send a Cease & Desist."
If only there was some group that they could hire to fight copyright violations...
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
The ultimate compliment is plagiarism. So what if it is the purpose of your company to fight against that very thing.
This is not the penguin you're looking for.
Pot, meet Kettle*
* copyright 2010 djdbass. Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to 5 years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.
*rips off rubber ghost mask*
*gasp* "It's old man copyright troll, the guy who runs the haunted bittorrent tracker site!"
"And I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't for you meddling kids!"
USCG stole something else as well then, their Acronym. USCG is the US COAST GUARD, not the US Copyright Group. These guys should get a clue.
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
It seems to me that the most appropriate solution to this would be to disbar the lawyers that run this firm. What they've done is clearly unethical, and it's also obvious that they were aware of (or should have been aware of) the infringement (they are intellectual property lawyers, right?).
This will discourage others from behaving this way, and will make it impossible for some obviously bad actors to earn a living by behaving badly. Perhaps they could consider a new career in fast food? In any case, I have no sympathy for these people.
Facts have a liberal bias.
copyright violation != theft
The image of the "woman paying a bill online in her kitchen" was not likely owned by the Copyright Enforcement Group either but was licensed stock photography from somewhere else. Not only did they rip off CEG but also the owner of the stock image...
Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
Kull: She told me she was 19!
This reminds me of Senator Hatch who used unlicensed copyrighted software on his official website but then attempted, believe it or not, to pass legislation that would allowed the recording industry to remotely automatically destroy computers when they discovered that their copyrighted music was being downloaded.
You couldn't invent this stuff...
http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2003/06/59305