Slashdot Mirror


Coronal Mass Ejection Hits Earth

astroengine writes "On Tuesday, the Earth was hit by a coronal mass ejection (CME), triggering a 'moderate' geomagnetic storm, igniting aurorae at high latitudes. The CME in question was launched from the sun early on Sunday and space weather scientists predicted its arrival on Aug. 3 — the vast magnetic bubble of solar plasma arrived on schedule."

154 comments

  1. Don't Give In! by VoxMagis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn it, we need to shoot back. Don't let the Sun see us flinch, make sure that we retaliate in kind!

    --
    -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
    1. Re:Don't Give In! by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read this article without my glasses on. I was a bit disturbed that a conjugal mass erection hit the earth.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Don't Give In! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not very Christianly of you. What ever happened to "turn the other hemisphere"?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Don't Give In! by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      George W Chimpface says:

      "Stars like Sol, Sirius, Canopus, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, glowing to threaten the dark of the world. The United States will lead a coalition of the willing to blacken it!"

    4. Re:Don't Give In! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only pay attention to civilian casualties, WikiLeaks is still there... Oh, wait... is it?

    5. Re:Don't Give In! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's not very Christianly of you. What ever happened to "turn the other hemisphere"?

      Good idea. Get back to me in 12 hours.

    6. Re:Don't Give In! by unity100 · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP. i posted in this discussion. not like there's much 'discussion' in this topic tho.

    7. Re:Don't Give In! by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Emily Litella, is that you?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:Don't Give In! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got hit by cosmic bukkake. Are you sure you want to escalate this war by firing back?

    9. Re:Don't Give In! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      thankfully not the erection, just the spooge hit us

    10. Re:Don't Give In! by g4b · · Score: 1

      i did wonder about who just put the MASSIVE canoe in my pocket.

    11. Re:Don't Give In! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i knew i felt funny yesterday...

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  2. Ahh, that explains it. by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    I was wondering why my RealDoll with the motorized enhancements seemed extra frisky this morning.

    .

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Ahh, that explains it. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why my RealDoll with the motorized enhancements seemed extra frisky this morning. .

      Can you please link that site for uh... research purposes?

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  3. Awesome. by DWMorse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Galactic porn. Very awesome. Earth was left glowing and satisfied.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO! Yours is the funniest comment... :D

    2. Re:Awesome. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      I would think been bukake'd by the sun was a humiliating experience.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    3. Re:Awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOAR!!

  4. Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    where Dr. Crusher was commanding the Enterprise. She used Dr. Raega's (Farengi scientist) metaphasic shield to enter a star's corona with the Borg in persuit, and then fired the phasers at the star just below the Borg ship.

    Moral of the story? Sucks get caught in a CME.

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    1. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      A CME happened in a Stargate Atlantis episode too.

      http://gateworld.net/atlantis/s3/312.shtml. Useful info links right above the episode banner.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Itninja · · Score: 5, Funny

      My nerd detector just exploded.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    3. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should have sprung for the extra money and gotten the model that's shielded against solar radiation.

    4. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope you were wearing a condom.

    5. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks get caught in a CME.

      That's what she said!

    6. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      I don't think condom comes in a size that would fit a sun.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    7. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by kv9 · · Score: 1

      where Dr. Crusher was commanding the Enterprise.

      she wasn't commanding the Enterprise in that episode, just the research team testing that shield thing. she commanded her own ship in the last episode (future) and the Enterprise when she was in another dimension with everyone else dissapearing around her. more adept TNG nerds feel free to correct me.

    8. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, maybe not where *you* shop.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    9. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      TNG nerd here. She was commanding the Enterprise at the time because the rest of the command crew were down on the planet working with the individualist Borgs.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    10. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      The episode I referred to is named Descent, Part II. BTW, memory-alpha.org is a sweet resource for nerds like us :)

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    11. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      My ridiculous recall for just about every episode of TNG is my resource ;) It's so bad that I can usually tell you what the episode's about just by the opening couple of shots and music. This really irritates my SO, who doesn't remember any of them and doesn't want the story related to her in the first 30 seconds.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    12. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I just figured some of us aren't as nerdy, or perhaps as privileged (I received the wonderful gift of the TNG complete box set for Christmas 4 years ago)!

      Memory Alpha details a lot of canon and non-canon information though, so I still recommend it :)

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    13. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Clazzy · · Score: 1

      Even better, it happened in SG1 here, with added time travel:
      http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s4/406.shtml

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    14. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by zubiaur · · Score: 1

      commenting to remove failed moderation, damn touchpad...

    15. Re:Reminds me of a Star Trek: TNG episode... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Thanks, dude. I hate when that happens.

  5. Induction Magnetometer by lazarus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Monitor the results.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  6. Everyone STOP MOVING! by Shanrak · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sun just lost a contact.

    --
    This post may or may not contain cancer causing materials.
    1. Re:Everyone STOP MOVING! by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

      +1 funny

    2. Re:Everyone STOP MOVING! by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      +1 funny

      Yeah I thought it was pretty funny too -- someone with mod points must hate Shanrak.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  7. Thank goodness there's no damage by krzysz00 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are three bits of good news in that article.
    1. 1. There was no damage to electronics or satellites, so all of the /. community's geeky shiny is safe
    2. 2. There will be really impressive light displays (which I hope someone will post on YouTube
    3. 3. We are developing the ability to forecast "space weather", thus leading to a new field, astrometeorology

    However, the bad news is that satellites might go if a bigger storm comes along.

    1. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      2. There will be really impressive light displays (which I hope someone will post on YouTube

      And what you will do tomorrow with all the blind people and those strange plants chasing them on the street?

    2. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by ElectroPrime · · Score: 0

      Umm, NASA didn't predict this - it was detected. How does that count as forecasting?

    3. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      So when will the Messiah drop by and explain to us what all this means?

    4. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Think I'll head to the coast - maybe I'll be safe at the top of a lighthouse...

    5. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steve Jobs is busy with other matters right now, so it could be a while. /s

    6. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by CyberGrandad · · Score: 2, Informative

      2. There will be really impressive light displays (which I hope someone will post on YouTube

      No video (so far) but there are photos at spaceweather.com.

    7. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      If NASA didn't then Slashdot did. Another clue might be that same link in the summary along with the word 'predicted' if you bothered to read that far. I know the summary was a whopping 2 sentences and all, but really =P

    8. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      When you start to hear the cheesy synth music, you know you are in trouble...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was some damage to satellites or the satellites malfunctioned somehow, what would stop the space lasers and missiles from hitting earth?

    10. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Combatso · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. 3. We are developing the ability to forecast "space weather", thus leading to a new field, astrometeorology

      just cuz im in my nitpick mood, the origin of the word meteorology is already astronomical. It was believed that meteors were part of earths weather system. So I think this new field should be called meteorology, and the old field should be called Geoweatherology... or Global Warming

      ... oh yeah http://www.bigsiteofamazingfacts.com/why-is-the-study-of-weather-called-meteorology-and-where-did-the-term-come-from

    11. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Combatso · · Score: 1

      because you detect something, and then predict its path/effect... the same way we forecast everything... unless you actually think the weather man just spins a wheel.

    12. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      3. We are developing the ability to forecast "space weather", thus leading to a new field, astrometeorology

      Aw, great, astrometeorologists, with bad hair pieces and stupid patter.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still waiting for my bumpers so leave him alone!

    14. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know nothing of this event do you.

      You could SEE the fricking sunspot on the sun. at sunrise you could see it with the naked eye. and if you know anything about sunspots you know that they WILL collapse and cause a CME.

      You know absolutely nothing about astronomy, stop talking. It's making you look like either Glenn Beck or a Retard...

    15. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      A friend of mine is a Mason and he said it's next wednesday at 4:35pm. Unfortunately the Holy Grail will not be available as it's currently in their vaults awaiting re-release after a hiatias to drum up more interest..

      I guess the Aliens from area 51 stole the thunder out of seeing the holy grail, and a dumbass in the dayton Ohio Temple drank from it when they last had it and his head melted.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by ElectroPrime · · Score: 1

      That I know - I'm talking about the CME itself.

    17. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      ...We are developing the ability to forecast "space weather", thus leading to a new field, astrometeorology...

      Does this mean we've finally given up on trying to forecast earth weather? Time to start up the The Old Atronaut's Almanac

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    18. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Sorry folks... I'm suffering Slashdot's Editor Syndrome..

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    19. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone is claiming to have predicted the CME... They detected it and then predicted that it would arrive at Earth at some time and cause a geomagnetic storm of some severity.

    20. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Drat, and here I was thinking that I could add this perfectly legitimate scenario to my BOFH excuse list.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    21. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'm hear, sorry I'm late.
      It means that everyone is to learn how to think rationally.

      Also, give me your broads.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aw, great, astrometeorologists, with bad hair pieces and stupid patter.

      He smiles at the camera, then tells a little joke
      He always says it's sunny if the telestrator's broke
      Thinks clouds are made of cotton and are blown up to the sky,
      But he's got a steady income as a TV weather guy

      "They say I'm not qualified to be on the TV
      Don't know Fahrenheit from Celsius so I just say 'degrees'
      I just read the temperature and make up a bunch of lies
      and end up being right more than the guy on channel 5."

      -- Arrogant Worms

    23. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, the ol' "trick the new guy into drinking from the Grail" bit. "It'll make you immortal! We've all done it! *snicker*"

      The Masons haven't been the same since they cracked down on Freshman hazing. :(

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by saider · · Score: 1

      It's making you look like either Glenn Beck or a Retard

      Rahm Emmanuel posts to slashdot!
      Sarah Palin will reply below.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    25. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      um, sort of. it's more accurate to say that "meteor" (in this sense meaning "bright streak in the sky") means "weather thing". so you've kind of got causality reversed there....

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    26. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      I hear it all the time, but I don't tell anyone.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    27. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by radtea · · Score: 1

      You know absolutely nothing about astronomy, stop talking. It's making you look like either Glenn Beck or a Retard...

      You repeated repeated yourself there. Either that, or you're being mean to retards.

      In any case, since sunspots are not mentioned anywhere in the Bible it is clear that this is just some secular humanist hoax. No one can actually predict astronomical events like the aurora, which are caused by God.

      How could an auroral display be caused by the sun, anyway? They happen at NIGHT! Duh.

      Either that, or this is just one more on the long, long list of "things Science can do that Faith can't," along with curing disease, reattaching limbs, generating clean, safe power, providing clean water and effective sewage treatment, increasing crop yeilds and preventing famine, and building depressingly deadly weapons.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    28. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by SEWilco · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sure they did. They predicted it in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Now that it happened they claim that they got it right.

    29. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Combatso · · Score: 1
      I dunno, my link sais

      The term meteor comes from the Latin meteorum, meaning “atmospheric phenomenon.” Aristotle liked the term so much, he used it to describe a number of weather occurrences.

      So I would think solar weather causing Auroras (an atmospheric phenomenon) would be a study of meteorology. In its original sense of the word.

    30. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by idontgno · · Score: 1

      3.3. We are developing the ability to forecast "space weather", thus leading to a new field, astrometeorology

      We've had space weather as a branch of operational meteorology for decades. I can testify to the fact that the US Air Force has performed operational space weather observation, warning, and forecasting missions since the early 1970s.

      It was never called "astrometeorology", though. Let's just say that the clever name you suggested will be your contribution to the field.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    31. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by krzysz00 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. So, do I get co-author credit on loads of papers in a field I never intend to study, just because I made up a clever name.

    32. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by brentrad · · Score: 1

      It's making you look like either Glenn Beck or a Retard...

      What's the difference?

    33. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      +5 to intelligence, retard's favor.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    34. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just cuz im in my nitpick mood, the origin of the word meteorology is already astronomical. It was believed that meteors were part of earths weather system. So I think this new field should be called meteorology, and the old field should be called Geoweatherology... or Global Warming

      ... oh yeah http://www.bigsiteofamazingfacts.com/why-is-the-study-of-weather-called-meteorology-and-where-did-the-term-come-from

      No offence intended, but there's very little on the page you cite that is at all accurate. Aristotle didn't invent the term, it doesn't come from Latin, and it's nothing to do with meteors. Greek meteoros means "in the sky", so "meteorology" simply means "the study of stuff in the sky". Aristotle's use of the word is just a fitting title for a work about weather, not a new coinage or anything like that.

      tl;dr: don't nitpick about ancient languages that you don't know.

    35. Re:Thank goodness there's no damage by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Messiah on Slashdot!

  8. And the point of this article is? by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

    Nothing but a follow up story about the relatively insignificant portion of a story that really should have been about the hardware recording it and not the event itself? http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/08/02/2028228

    --
    Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    1. Re:And the point of this article is? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd be more interested to know if anyone saw it in their area. I'm around London, Ont. I didn't see any this morning, but my buddy directly across the lake in Michigan did, and a bit further north his friends saw it as well. I'm sure one of these days, when it's not cloudy, humid, raining, snowing, or anything other than a semi-clear sky I'll see them around here. Because every time we have one, it's not really the best viewing weather.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  9. The last time there was a... by hbean · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...mass ejection of corona like this, it was spring break in Cancun.

    --
    "Give someone a program, frustrate them for a day... Teach someone to program, frustrate them for a lifetime."
  10. EMP? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Could something like this have the same effect on electronics as an EMP?

    Imagine the chaos if all the microprocessors on the planet burned out at once. Or just in one hemisphere.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:EMP? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could something like this have the same effect on electronics as an EMP?

      Imagine the chaos if all the microprocessors on the planet burned out at once. Or just in one hemisphere.

      On the surface, not so much - the magnetosphere funnels those charged particles to the magnetic poles, where they interact with the atmosphere and create the stunning light shows we call auroras. That said, they can induce currents to flow, especially in long lines (think power lines) which can cause circuit breakers to trip, cutting off the grid and causing power outages.

      In space, they cause lots of havoc with satellites - ranging from simple loss of communication (moving charged particles generate EM radiation, after all - same ones that cause power outages mentioned above), to complete destruction if it burns out some control circuits. So not only are the electronics rad-hard, but there are shut down protocols to temporarily turn satellites "off" to prevent damage. A dead satellite is a huge cloud of space junk waiting to happen, after all, especially if you can't deorbit it.

      Of course, the magnetosphere is supposed to be weakening in time for a supposed pole reversal, in which case life will get pretty interesting.

      This CME didn't result in any damage to satellites, though. Not sure if there weren't other effects (power outages, notable) caused, though.

  11. But there were neutrinos in it! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Didn't any of you watch 2012?! We're doomed! Neutrinos! Just wait. This is only the beginning.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:But there were neutrinos in it! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Just rotate the shields frequency.

      What do you mean, Earth has no shields? There's a planetary shields manufacturer in Alpha Centauri.

      What do you mean you’ve never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heavens sake mankind, it’s only four light years away, you know.

    2. Re:But there were neutrinos in it! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I don't think anybody watched 2012!

      (Bit I did enjoy the trailer).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:But there were neutrinos in it! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I did... On dvd, not in the theatre.
      It was completely in the face of logic and common sense and hurt to watch scientifically.
      It was a good special effects bang-boom movie, though.
      Scary thing is, some people watched it and thought it was a documentary...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    4. Re:But there were neutrinos in it! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I just couldn't go to see it after the spoof trailer that I linked to above. I saw the serious trailer afterwards in the cinema and it was just taking itself so seriously I could barely stop myself from laughing.

      How can anyone think that is a documentary? I don't know. Scary thing is, I'm not surprised by that. : (

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  12. Hey Oli, what's the weather outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    SPACE WEATHER!!!

  13. I think we can time travel off of this but have no by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I think we can time travel off of this but have no to little control of how far.

  14. Timings by Necroloth · · Score: 0

    the vast magnetic bubble of solar plasma arrived on schedule

    I wish my post did the same :*(

    1. Re:Timings by Necroloth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lol@overrated mod... it wasn't even rated in the first place.

    2. Re:Timings by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      lol@overrated mod... it wasn't even rated in the first place.

      Yes it was. It wasn't moderated yet, but it was rated (it had a score).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  15. We know it's started, but when will it finish? by davrob60 · · Score: 2

    In other word, does I have better chances to spot an northern light tonight? or tomorrow? or this weekend?

    1. Re:We know it's started, but when will it finish? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Only one way to find out.. Look up :)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:We know it's started, but when will it finish? by davrob60 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty cloudy right now and I'm wondering if it will be finished when the sky clear.

    3. Re:We know it's started, but when will it finish? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      In other word, does I have better chances to spot an northern light tonight?

      OK, who is letting the lolcat post on Slashdot again? :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  16. Take that, Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  17. How about the highlander II one? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    How about the highlander II one?

    1. Re:How about the highlander II one? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      How about the highlander II?

      Highlander 2? That can't exist as there can be only one

  18. Lame by Hatta · · Score: 1

    It was stormy here last night. The only lights in the sky were lightning.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Lame by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      No it wasn't, that was a couple days ago.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Lame by AhabTheArab · · Score: 1

      No, it was stormy last night. The thunder woke me up because it was loud. Then the lightning assisted in keeping me awake because it was bright. Though I suppose it was stormy two nights ago as well.

  19. The good and the bad by dtmos · · Score: 5, Informative

    The additional bit of good news (if you're a VHF amateur radio operator, or FM or TV broadcast DXer) is that there should be interesting propagation of VHF radio signals refracting off of the aurora, perhaps as far as 2000 km. The bad news is that the same ionization that refracts the VHF signals attenuates HF signals, so if you're an HF amateur radio operator or short-wave listener, the paths over the poles will be closed for a few days.

    I guess the additional bad news if you're a VHF broadcaster (FM or over-the-air TV) is that you can expect a lot of calls from the public complaining about poor reception, as signals from far away interfere with yours. :-/

    1. Re:The good and the bad by s122604 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks like 10 meters is actually doing well, maybe even better than before the event, but that might just be sporadic E, I dunno

      I've always loved the top end of the HF spectrum 10 meters, and the 11 meter "freeband", sometimes it acts like VHF, sometimes HF, sometimes both.

      On a side note, how ashamed should I be to say I have a "favorite" portion of the spectrum?

    2. Re:The good and the bad by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is related, just pointing it out in case. I listen to an AM radio station on the rare occasion that I drive to work...I drove today because it is outlandishly hot here today....that station was just crazy noises. This station is always the first one I lose when I drive out of town...guessing it is related.

    3. Re:The good and the bad by m.ducharme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you see the Star-Trek nerdery above? I don't think you have anything to be ashamed of compared to that (unless of course you were one of the participants...)

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    4. Re:The good and the bad by JargonScott · · Score: 1

      Good news though, we'll be able to contact our deceased dads in the past, and warn them to stop smoking.

      --
      Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
  20. I watched Flash Gordon last night by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I watched Flash Gordon last night and obviously missed all the excitement, thinking the BluRay had been redone REALLY well.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    1. Re:I watched Flash Gordon last night by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      He saved every one of us!

    2. Re:I watched Flash Gordon last night by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The unprecedented solar eclipse is no cause for alarm.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I watched Flash Gordon last night by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      HOT HAIL!

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  21. Re:I think we can time travel off of this but have by crakbone · · Score: 2

    We did travel but it was to the future at a rate of 1x normal

  22. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/209/

  23. There was some damage here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We lost a pair of SNE2000 SDSL ethernet extenders (bridges that use a plain dry copper twisted pair, in our case for several thousand feet between two buildings) when the geomagnetic storm first hit. The devices at both ends failed (DSP chip burnout) exactly simultaneously.

    1. Re:There was some damage here... by Kagura · · Score: 0, Troll

      We lost a pair of SNE2000 SDSL ethernet extenders (bridges that use a plain dry copper twisted pair, in our case for several thousand feet between two buildings) when the geomagnetic storm first hit. The devices at both ends failed (DSP chip burnout) exactly simultaneously.

      Doubt it! In whose relativistic frame of reference did they occur simultaneously? I hope you don't say "the middle of the cable" because that doesn't take into account the rotation of the earth...

  24. So... by Finerva · · Score: 1

    the sun farted...?

  25. Video of Yesterday's Northern Lights in Latvia by HollyMolly-1122 · · Score: 0
  26. Anyone know how low they got? by rift321 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know how low in latitude the Auroras reached - I'm around 44degrees north, and after seeing them once before, I'd travel quite a distance to view them, as long as I can make it to work tomorrow...

    Damned weather systems are making things difficult, though.

    Also, I'm interested in how high the Kp index needs to be for Auroras to be highly visible at my latitude. I went to school in Potsdam, NY, and was lucky enough to see a spectacular display right overhead one late fall night during finals week... spectacular enough for me to lose even more sleep while crunching for a final exam.

    1. Re:Anyone know how low they got? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try, find an answers in hidden comments. Seems ordinary people posts isn't visible by default. So, community shrinks to the scored ones in the past. For weather anomalies it's a wrong strategy. Let's say: weather anomalies video could be recorded by anobody. Not just ones who are better scored...

  27. Computer Crashes by SirBitBucket · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had 5 of 25 machines crash last night. Could this be related? (Yes, I am serious...)

    1. Re:Computer Crashes by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not.
      The next time there's a coronal mass ejection, power them all down and wait in the data center until the emergency radio says it's over.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Computer Crashes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. Sorry, but you can't blame you low grade administration skills on this, nice try~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Re:I think we can time travel off of this but have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pray for peace, prepare for war!

  29. A little late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish this would have been posted BEFORE the aurora. I guess it wasnt visible in north America but who knew?

    1. Re:A little late... by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Err, there was a post the day before yesterday, here on /. even, that reported the sunspot activity and subsequent prediction for aurorae last night. Guess you missed it.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  30. Last night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... your was hit by a "coronal" mass ejection (CME) from my wang. Resulting in temporary blindness and some stinging. Scientists predict I'll be back at full capacity by this evening.

  31. video of Yesterday's Northern Lights in Latvia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW9uEwtWUs0

      I've posted it under nickname, but seems to be no one can see it. As far as under nickname there is score 0.
    It's better to stay anonymous coward in order to get noticed, than log in into slasdot. Is it supposed to work this way ?

  32. Re:I think we can time travel off of this but have by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Which is great, the average English class travels at 0.2s/s

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  33. Re:I think we can time travel off of this but have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I like to pretend my chair is a time machine. I'll spin around and around and say, "I'm traveling to the future!" And you know what, it usually works!

  34. Yo by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    He who smelt it, dealt it.

    Signed,

    Sol

  35. Re:I think we can time travel off of this but have by snooo53 · · Score: 1

    From watching TV, you would think that time travel is almost always guaranteed take you to one of the iconic eras of the 20th century

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  36. This agression will not stand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will not be intimidated!

  37. Photo of Aurora consequent to CME by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Took this photo of the aurora last night in the short window of full darkness before the moon came up.

    There will be another shooting opportunity tonight, if the geomagnetic storm continues.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  38. Hubble *and* the ISS up there... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

    ...and we still missed the "money shot".

    1. Re:Hubble *and* the ISS up there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try, find an answers in hidden comments. Seems ordinary people posts isn't visible by default. So, community shrinks to the scored ones in the past. For weather anomalies it's a wrong strategy. Let's say: weather anomalies video could be recorded by anobody. Not just by ones who are better scored...

  39. Quick !!! Dont blink !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    i dont know how you can accomplish a quick 'not blinking', but, do it fast ! because, we should not blink.

  40. My Eyes!! My Eyes!! by motorhead · · Score: 0

    See what I did there?

    --
    Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
  41. No Ka-Boom? by jd2112 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Ka-Boom.
    -Marvin.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  42. Solar Storm of 1859 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The Solar Storm of 1859 was one of the largest known in history and just glanced the modern Electronic Age. The significant electronic device in use at the time was the 15-year old telegraph. Lesser storms since then have brought down power grids.

  43. sci-fi novel One Second After (spoiler) by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The novel One Second After is one of those post-apocalyptic stories of a severe EMP attack. The cause, whether military or cosmic, is not dwelled on. Its just that all electric power, computers, and memories halt in an instant. In real life something in basement might survive. But the author killed off almost all technology for dramatic purposes. This includes all vehicles built after 1980 which have computing inside them. It is set in a rural town several days walk from a major city. The first result is the utter silence - no way to send or receive news until some museum vacuum tube ham radios are revived. Then comes the expected mayhem - people whose lives depending on machinery or medicine all die. There are fierce fights for dwindling resources. Eventually life would return to early 1800s self-independent farming. But that could only support about a tenth of the current population.

    1. Re:sci-fi novel One Second After (spoiler) by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Sunstorm by Clarke / Baxter deals with the same issue, albeit in the scenario where they know a massive storm is coming 5 years ahead and take measures to prevent Earth from being turned into Mars.

      Not a bad read, can't say how accurate the science is.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  44. Not Fair by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

    I'm in Fairbanks
    We won't see night before the end of August
    Auroras just aren't the same in daylight

    Can we reschedule this to reoccur around the end of September?
    Then we get total darkness early enough to be of use and the temperatures aren't too cold to go outside

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    1. Re:Not Fair by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, I take 'em when I can get 'em. :)

      Here's another shot from last night, if it'll make you feel any better

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Not Fair by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That's pretty intense. How close is it to what you you'd see with unaided eyes?

    3. Re:Not Fair by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not close at all. At my latitude, this storm was a vague glow in the sky; I could see that it was there, and in this case, I could even see a little bit of the detail, but it's just at the edge of vision. The camera, however, can see far more than I can in terms of low light; I used a long exposure, and a wide, light-gathering aperture (like your eye's pupil open wide, only much wider), and turned up the sensitivity of the amplifier on camera's sensor to its maximum in order to capture what you see here.

      To perceive it like this with the naked eye, either it would have to be much more intense (which does happen), or you would need to be further north and, as the lament above indicates, be enjoying a season during which the sun isn't hanging above you all night.

      I've only seen auroral activity this intense with my naked eye twice in twenty years around here. But this solar cycle has been very active in terms of CMEs and general flashiness, and my hopes are high that it'll happen this time around. I wrote an application (PD, linux/OSX) that lets me see what the auroral and observing conditions are, and another one that texts me when conditions are right, so for the first time in my life, I'll not miss even one opportunity except by choice.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Not Fair by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. Where I'm at (near Boston) there's too many trees, hills, houses, and too much light pollution around for anything. I do envy your Big Sky view :)

    5. Re:Not Fair by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. WRT the view, yeah... but you have museums, fine dining, aquariums, water parks, theater, concerts, symphonies, conventions, a couple of centuries of fine architecture, the ocean, hills, caves, shopping, clubs and societies, modeling agencies, all manner of service industries and contractors, pizza delivery (and many different variations on pizza), grinder shops... I could go on for hours.

      So while there are definitely a few benefits to living here, I think the envy is mostly on the other foot, as it were.

      I drive to the coasts as often as I can so I may partake in all that goodness, but "often as I can" isn't really very often in the big picture... and I have business interests that both provide a reason to go, and usually manage to interfere with my fun once I get there. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  45. A serious question by ebuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, how much additional mass did the earth obtain? I'm guessing that most of it was hydrogen, but it would be cool to get even a ball park figure.

    A few liters (at STP), a few moles, a kilogram, immeasurably small, or much more? Somebody who is more familiar with the field has to have made an estimate. Was it all energy or was mass actually transferred?

    1. Re:A serious question by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, lets take a look.

      If we only count the high energy protons from the link, we get a counting rate of over 1/cm^2/sr/s over a day.

      If we take the sun as source, we have about 6e-5 sr as a solid angle. The earth has a crossection of about 128 million km^2, = 1.28e16 cm^2.

      so if we count the proton mass over 84000 seconds, it will be about 6e16 protons, so total mass is about 100 picogram.

      Its not my field, but my guess would be that its negligible compared to normal solar wind. The point that counts is the massive energy of the particles (those numbers where for E>10MeV)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  46. My HOA is fining me for excessive coronal mass by HermDog · · Score: 1

    And I just raked the lawn the day before.

    --
    JADBP
  47. It could be worse... by zkiwi34 · · Score: 1

    There could be proposed a theory of anthropogenic warming of space all caused by us that will arise and become "settled science" or not.

  48. Re:Seeing this headline in red... by supertrinko · · Score: 1

    I agree, we don't have atlantis to hide under.

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  49. Wow! Celestial Events Follow Expectations! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Holy Grid! After the magnetic storm everything went exactly as expected! I am awed! This must be news worthy of Slashdot!