Slashdot Mirror


Spinal-Fluid Test Confirmed To Predict Alzheimer's

omnibit writes "The New York Times reports that researchers have found a spinal-fluid test can be 100 percent accurate in identifying patients with significant memory loss who are on their way to developing Alzheimer's disease. The new study included more than 300 patients in their seventies, 114 with normal memories, 200 with memory problems, and 102 with Alzheimer's disease. Their spinal fluid was analyzed for amyloid beta, which forms plaques in the brain, and for tau, another protein that accumulates in dead and dying nerve cells in the brain. Nearly every person with Alzheimer's had the characteristic spinal fluid protein levels."

31 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Thank goodness: by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah... too bad it's a spinal fluid test. Those are nasty. My spouse had one and the hole in the dura refused to close, which is apparently a fairly common side effect. Net result: unbearable, nonstop, over-10-on-a-1-to-10-scale headaches that can't be controlled with headache medicine. Caffeine on an IV drip works, but only temporarily. The headaches lasted for weeks until the doctors finally managed to close the hole with a blood clot. The clot doesn't actually fix the problem, but the dura managed to repair itself while the clot held. I've heard of people, however, who *never* healed from it. What a miserable experience.

    --
    "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Gandhi
  2. 100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! by Alphanos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, just to clarify, this test "can be 100% accurate", while at the same time "Nearly every person with Alzheimer's had the characteristic spinal fluid protein levels."

    That's a pretty neat trick.

    --
    Alphanos
    1. Re:100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, not only that, but also it says that many people without Alzheimer's turned out positive too ... so they assumed those are going to develop Alzheimer's.

      It produces false negatives, and it might be producing false-positives, but we won't know until 10 or 20 years later. But it still is 100% accurate. Nice math there. This trend of early publishing non peer reviewed material while making extraordinary claims, only to never hear from it again is starting to get really old.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      299/300 = .9966 = 99.66%
      you want 3 sigfigs

      99.7%

    3. Re:100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Read it again, because there is nothing in the article that contradicts the claim that "researchers have found a spinal-fluid test can be 100 percent accurate in identifying patients with significant memory loss who are on their way to developing Alzheimer's disease.":

      "Nearly every person with Alzheimer's had the characteristic spinal fluid protein levels. Nearly three quarters of people with mild cognitive impairment, a memory impediment that can precede Alzheimer's, had Alzheimer's-like spinal fluid proteins. And every one of those patients with the proteins developed Alzheimer's within five years. And about a third of people with normal memories had spinal fluid indicating Alzheimer's. Researchers suspect that those people will develop memory problems. "

      However, the test can only be 100% accurate if the spinal fluid proteins that presage Alzheimer's decrease after full onset.

      The fact that not everybody who tested positive developed Alzheimer's during the study is no counter-indicator at all, especially if they kept testing new subjects throughout the trial (i.e. some were only tested recently).

      Of course, the usual caveats apply - you can't predict with 100% accuracy who will develop Alzheimer's years from now because some will die first of other causes. And in biology (and medicine), even if your test is correct on the first 10 patients, and the first 100, and 1000, you just know some smart-alec is going to buck the trend eventually :) Biology is just too messy to follow any simple rules all the time. But that doesn't necessarily have a whole lot of relevance to clinical applications.

  3. BAPtists and Tauists? by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd heard years ago that there was dispute between researchers who thought the disease was caused by "beta amyloid plaques" versus by this "tau" protein. Does the test for both show that there's still no consensus on the cause, or has one been established as the cause and the other an effect?

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
    1. Re:BAPtists and Tauists? by Mishotaki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tau? i'd bet it's the Orks, not the Tau that's the problem!

    2. Re:BAPtists and Tauists? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does the test for both show that there's still no consensus on the cause, or has one been established as the cause and the other an effect?

      I think the fact that both are used merely shows that there's consensus that both are strong markers of the disease. Actually proving cause and effect is going to require better animal models, better culture systems to replicate the disease in a dish, or people willing to sacrifice themselves. I heard a seminar about 3 years ago by a "tauist," who was arguing that if you artificially expressed tau in mouse brains, their neurons started acting like early stages of alzheimers, but the mice never developed plaques. He suggested plaques might be a symptom that only comes up in human brains, or after several years longer than mice live, or some more complicated reasons, but he really didn't know. I haven't heard any research from a BAPtist, so I don't know the other side of the story. I'm guessing there haven't been any definitive answers since then.

      The answer could be entirely academic anyway, this one causes that other one but both are necessary for the actual disease, so a treatment for the dependent step might be all you need, or the answer could be that both are required together, or that either one is sufficient to cause the other one.

  4. Re:Thank goodness: by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    That happens, but it is rare. But because of the potential numbers of people who would want the test, the difficulty of doing a lumbar puncture (spinal tap) on persons who have arthritis in the back (very common among us ancient folk), are of the supersized persuasion, or have other reasons to dissuade themselves, I don't think this is going to be the ultimate test.

    Instead it will serve as a proxy to allow simpler tests to be developed. TFA also notes that PET scans are fairly accurate. These are available at many larger medical centers but are also pretty pricey and technically complex.

    This is also not the first time that lumbar punctures for beta amyloid have been used to diagnose Alzheimer's. And finally, the abstract of the original article for your viewing pleasure.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Not just a test benefit by Eccles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only does this give an actual test for Alzheimers, it also means that there's a definitive symptom for it. Wipe out the cause of that symptom and maybe you can stop or reverse the progression of this horrible affliction.

    My father is already at the moderate dementia stage of this illness, and it's devastating. Not so much for him as it is for my mother.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  6. no kidding by RelliK · · Score: 2, Funny

    The spinal needle goes up to 11 (inches).

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  7. Does knowing early help? by RabbitWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no treatment for it and nothing they can do. I'd rather not know for as long as possible, you start going crazy as you watch yourself deteriorating every day. If I forget and put door keys in the microwave I think "oh I'm such an idiot." and laugh. I don't feel the terror that someone with Alzheimers feels, thinking every mistake is a sign.

    1. Re:Does knowing early help? by olsmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I tend to agree with your position, there are many who would want to know, particularly if there is a family history of this disease. It might affect your planning for the future, and even the way you live your life today.

    2. Re:Does knowing early help? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Watching my grandpa suffer through Alzheimer's, this is a real issue. At first he took it with a sense of humor, when I called he'd say, "hey, I almost forgot about you! Call more often!" But soon I could see it was really getting to him, and he was starting to withdraw into that stupor that people get into at convalescent homes.

      So I forced him to be active; when he tries to tell me something, and can't think of the word, I just wait for him to spit it out, or tell him to explain it a different way. Get him active, help him see that life can be good even though he doesn't remember quite as well. I treat him like a human and make him connect to me like a human. No withdrawing into that shell just because you can't remember well. I took him to see giant trees and waves and stuff. Giant trees and waves always make you feel alive.

      So now he is happier, got over his anger streak, and he doesn't worry if he can't remember everything (it doesn't matter if you can find a way to work around it).

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Does knowing early help? by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no treatment for it and nothing they can do. I'd rather not know for as long as possible, you start going crazy as you watch yourself deteriorating every day.

      And to think we used to cluck our tongues at the people who ate badly, smoked, drank, etc who died of a coronary at 60-70. Now you can live to 90 and be a vegetable. Hooray.

      Until the mind can be prolonged the same way medicine has prolonged the body, it's all for nothing.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Does knowing early help? by Ironhandx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shit, all my grandfathers children are treating him like a borderline invalid now, and he's still in good shape. I took him out cutting wood for a few weeks winter before last. Sure he can't do as much as he used to, but not being treated like an invalid and doing something useful for a few weeks... the poor guy looked better for months afterwards than he had for years previously.

      Seriously though, a man that can still safely swing a chain saw plus haul the logs he cut(all but the biggest, some of which I couldn't even move without further segmenting) is far from an invalid. I personally think this is a very widespread flaw in the current 30-60 generation in regards to their parents. I guess a lot of the 40-60 crowd led cushier lives and already can't do a lot of what their parents still can at 60-80+. I know thats a lot of the reason my grandfathers children treat him like an invalid. They basically look at it and go "Shit, I can't even begin to do that, theres no way its even safe for him to try!" Meanwhile he'd run circles around them.

      I'm currently looking for a good part time job for him(something suitable, similar to what he did all his life, but of course without too much back breaking labour, he is in his 70's) just to get his spirits up. People don't understand it, my own generation included, but sometimes people are happier when they're WORKING. Not everyone digs the "Get as much money saved as I can so I can be as lazy as possible for as long as possible" lifestyle. My grandfather retired at 65 because the family basically forced him to. He wouldn't have if it was his choice.

      Obviously his situation isn't going to be the situation of every other older person out there. If you've got one of those age related bone diseases or develop heart problems... things like that, then obviously for your own health you can't do what you've always done. Otherwise... people should just be more supportive and let folks do whatever the hell they want to do.

      One other pet peeve of mine is that people complain that "Oh but that 65 year old man/woman doesn't need to work, they're taking a job away from a young person just starting out!". Well let me be the first one to say, if you're 15-25 and you can't out work a 65 year old its time to put down the god damn cheetos and get off the couch.

      Sorry for going a bit far off topic, but back on topic: My grandfather is in a high risk group for developing a particularly nasty brand of alzheimers, and one of the most effective methods of keeping it at bay is exercise, so it really hits home for me when people mention this sort of thing, and pisses me off to no extent at the rest of my family.

    5. Re:Does knowing early help? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, let's leave you not knowing and continuing to drive, or forget what checks you've signed, or whether your spouse is allergic to peanuts when you make her a sandwich, and leave you without a chance organize your finances, any insurance, and a living will for a years long debilitating illness.

      Then you can get promoted to middle management, where you can cut costs by discarding that "unnecessary testing".

    6. Re:Does knowing early help? by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Currently the correct treatment is suicide. Early knowledge is very important, because later when the suffering really begins for you and your family, you will be helpless. You might argue that one could exit too soon, but a good death can't really be too early.

    7. Re:Does knowing early help? by RabbitWho · · Score: 2, Informative

      Suicide is more painful for the family, believe me.

    8. Re:Does knowing early help? by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they really would enjoy smothering you with a pillow, I suppose you could give them that as a parting gift.

  8. Re:Thank goodness: by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yup my Dad had that done and he said it was the most painful thing he'd ever had happen... and this was a guy who grew up on a farm (a great source of pain), served years in combat during WWII and so on and so, on without ever raising a complaint.

    The next time he had to go in was because of a disc problem and they essentially injected his spine with meat tenderizer to dissolve the ruptured disk away. He said compared to the spinal tap that didn't hurt at all (except for the nurse yanking his boxers off without first checking for protrusions - yikes!).

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  9. Re:Sex Panther by mtinsley · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm gonna be honest with you, that smells like pure gasoline

  10. Re:Potentially huge problem with the test by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amyloid beta was there and it was targetable by the methodology available to drugs companies. Now, they've discovered it doesn't work, and there's a few years of lag time between findings synchronising. I don't think there are any more gamma-sec or beta-sec programs in drug discovery. Let's just hope there's another target around.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  11. Re:Thank goodness: by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only 100% accurate? Given the necessity for a spinal tap it should go to 110%.

  12. Re:Thank goodness: by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In her early onset of Alzheimer's, I used to say shocking things about my life to my Grandmother. She'd be surprised, righteously indignant, and secretly curious. She'd ask all sorts of questions. Fifteen minutes later, we'd do it all again.

    When I left from these visits, she'd be absolutely glowing. She'd be awake, excited, and extremely happy. And she had no idea what happened. Next time in, I could make the shocking revelations again with the same effect.

  13. Re:Thank goodness: by hey · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I had points I'd bump you to 6.

  14. Re:Thank goodness: by electrostatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man visits his doctor.

    Man: "What's the news, Doc."

    Doc: "Not so good. Test results show cancer, and ... spinal fluid indicates ... Alzheimers."

    Man: "... Well, at least I don't have cancer."

  15. From someone that lost his mother to Alzheimer's by pgmrdlm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't know if this is good or not. Please let me explain.

    If you have ever had the misfortune of having a relative with Alzheimer disease, you know they are nothing like the person you loved and cherished. Everything from forgetfulness, to wanderings where you search the streets for them, to the extreme mood swings where they get violent. Its a terrible experience for both you and the people that have this disease.

    If you are diagnosed with this disease in advance, and there are no cures? How do you tell your family and friends? What are you going to think about the pain you know that you may be putting them in?

    Knowing how my mother became with this disease, if I find out that I have it and there are no cures. I don't want to put my friends and family through the same experience. I would rather drive my car into a wall at 120 miles an hour.

    Just my perception, sorry.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  16. Re:Thank goodness: by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    The debilitating headache is not rare; it occurs in a third of all cases and normally lasts 24-48 hours. What's rare is when it lasts a year or more. Somewhere in-between is my spouse's case, which lasted a couple weeks and took medical remediation.

    --
    "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Gandhi
  17. Re:Thank goodness: by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never had meat tenderiser shot up my back, but I've had two lumbar punctures. The first one wasn't too bad, the second one was almighty awful.

    The only thing I underwent that hurt more was after a fight (I was doing street photography and was attacked by a bunch of youth), I had a corneal abrasion on my left eye. My understanding of it is that there was a small hole, gap, or something, on the outer layer of my eye, against which my eyelid rests. I had this small gap dead centre in front of my iris (or whatever you look through is called).

    You may not be aware of this, but your eyes move constantly, and having a little gap in what used to be the smooth surface of your eye means that with every tiny movement of your eye, there's friction. I didn't notice anything after the fight, however, the next morning, I woke up around 5AM and was effectively blind (I couldn't open the other eye, as that would cause my other eye to try and open too). For the next two days, I was blind, not because my eyes were unable to see, but because the pain was unbearable. At the hospital, I was given a topical anaesthetic, which removed any trace of pain. That nurse became my new best friend. Though, what it didn't remove was the massive photophobia I was suffering from.

    Photophobia is a very disturbing phenomenon. We aren't used to having our eyes not adapt to the available light. No matter where I went, everything was overexposed. I couldn't read anything written on white paper (too bright), they had to switch off all the lights in the exam room for me to get the eyesight test done.

    Luckily, just over a week after the incident any discomfort was gone, I still had problems focusing (which lasted for about a month), and dry eyes (fake eyedrops are a godsend), and photophobia remained for about 3 months, in a lesser extent than previously. And using sunglasses when reading your email doesn't make you look cool, it just makes you look stupid.

    Being an avid photographer, I was shell-shocked that my eyesight was so fragile, and that even though the pain withdrew relatively quickly, being blind for a couple of days really made me very, very humble towards people who have live with that handicap on a daily basis.

    Makes you think, of all the senses we have (hearing, vision, smell, touch, and some might even argue that memory is a sense as well), which one would you choose to lose if you had to? We take a lot of things for granted, our body, and our most basic senses that make up the experience of self. If you couldn't remember the experiences that made you 'you', would you still be 'you'? Would you still be yourself if you couldn't see, or hear?

  18. "100 percent accurate" vs "Nearly every person" by RichiH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How I love Slashdot summaries.