Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Develop Brain-Microchip Bridge

dreampod writes "Canadian scientists have developed a microchip capable of monitoring the electrical and chemical communication channels between individual neurons. This is the first time scientists have been able to monitor the interaction between brain cells on such a precise and subtle level. In addition to providing the ability to see more easily the impact of drugs on various mental disorders during testing, this provides one of the first fundamental steps towards real mind-machine interface."

118 comments

  1. singularity by laktech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll be looking forward to discuss these developments at the Singularity Conference this weekend!

    1. Re:singularity by icebike · · Score: 1

      Resistance is Futile.

      Prepare to be assimilated.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:singularity by trum4n · · Score: 4, Funny

      UPGRADE MY DAMN MEMORY. i can NEVER remember my passwords....

    3. Re:singularity by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You already had an appointment.

      Yesterday.

    4. Re:singularity by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
      Resistance is Futile.
      Prepare to be assimilated.

      Ohm mani padme hum?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:singularity by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Too late. I already use Windows.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    6. Re:singularity by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Too late. I already use Windows.

      That gives the Blue Screen of Death a whole new meaning.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. But not in a real brain? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    TFA is vague but it looks like the cells in question are being kept alive outside the organism. I suppose this could be adapted into an implantable device, but cochlear implants almost do that anyway.

    1. Re:But not in a real brain? by catbutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cochlear implants go the opposite direction. Cochlear implants are like speakers, this is like a microphone.

    2. Re:But not in a real brain? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cochlear implants go the opposite direction. Cochlear implants are like speakers, this is like a microphone.

      Thats true but the important thing here is the interface, which works both ways. This device may have more resolution though, and it seems precise enough to talk to individual neurons, rather than nerve cells.

    3. Re:But not in a real brain? by catbutt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well I'm not sure what you mean by nerve cells vs. neurons (they are the same thing, by my understanding), but for every neuron there might be 1000 synapses, so that might be what you mean. I couldn't tell from the story, though.

    4. Re:But not in a real brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up. A neuron is a nerve cell.

    5. Re:But not in a real brain? by icebike · · Score: 1

      But I'm not all that sure a single neuron is a reasonable long term target for such a device. After all that neuron could die just when you need it most, (or after a few stiff drinks).

      Also, I'm not sure a human can fire a single given neuron in the brain with any precision when (and only when) desired.

      I would expect that further research could allow clusters of these sensors to monitor small regions of the brain and detect when that region was fired in a specific way, (as opposed to some random triggering while dreaming or having sex or some other horribly inappropriate time).

      Then you could have the QWERTY keyboard in your head (or the flaps, ailerons, engines, and missiles).

      I'm sure the keyboard and mouse have a few years left before people start drilling holes in their head for sensors.

      However there are a lot of people, blind, spinal damaged, who would be pushing to be first in line for trials.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:But not in a real brain? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not sure what you mean by nerve cells vs. neurons (they are the same thing, by my understanding), but for every neuron there might be 1000 synapses, so that might be what you mean. I couldn't tell from the story, though.

      The difference, I think, is that nerve cells are more isolated than neurons in the brain. So for a nerve you can use a large detector to isolate a signal but to get meaningful data from nerve cells (neurons) in a mass of neurons you need high resolution.

    7. Re:But not in a real brain? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 3, Funny

      (or the flaps, ailerons, engines, and missiles)

      Yes, but you have to think in Russian

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    8. Re:But not in a real brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, they're the same thing. Neuron == nerve == nerve cell. A neuron consists of a cell body (the prokaryon), one axon (outgoing signal), and one or more dendrites (incoming). They connect to each other from axon to dendrite, at links called synapses. The signal is propagated by very high-resolution, high-frequency balancing and shifting ion gradients.

    9. Re:But not in a real brain? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      So, you hook them together and you can hear your own thoughts!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:But not in a real brain? by catbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, but the idea is to monitor thousands or even millions of them....at least if you are planning on doing the kinds of sci-fi-ish things we'd like to do. The issue here is what resolution are we working at. Current technology is several orders of magnitude less than neuron level. Neuron level (or even higher, synapes level) would be good, even if each individual neuron may not be giving a lot of info. (just as every pixel in an image doesn't have a lot of info)

      Whether we can ever do it, and whether we'll be able to process all the data meaningfully, no one knows. But the future is long.

    11. Re:But not in a real brain? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm sure the keyboard and mouse have a few years left before people start drilling holes in their head for sensors.

      Sigh.

      You should have told me that 10 minutes ago...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:But not in a real brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or the flaps, ailerons, engines, and missiles)

      Yes, but you have to think in Russian

      http://tinyurl.com/247mdwa

    13. Re:But not in a real brain? by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, a nerve is not the same thing as a neuron (or "nerve cell" if you like). Nerves are bundles of axons extending from the neurons that travel to and from the sensory/muscle systems to the nervous system. For example, we have 12 cranial nerves and about 30 spinal nerves.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    14. Re:But not in a real brain? by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but you have to think in Russian

      Only if you're using Firefox. As AC hinted, Chrome can do this translation for you.

    15. Re:But not in a real brain? by mrbobjoe · · Score: 1

      Heh, is this is alternate form of "That would have worked if you hadn't stopped me"?

    16. Re:But not in a real brain? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      You had no trepidation regarding trepanation?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  3. Read the small print by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before jumping on this, read the small print.
    They take out a piece of brain tissue, and implant it into the machinery, not the other way around. I'm not sure about you guys, but that kind of interface doesn't seem too useful to me, although it could be useful for diagnosis.

    1. Re:Read the small print by catbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's what is known as "an important first step". That is, having communication between neurons and electronics. Once you've done that, it is another (admittedly large)step to make it practical.

      Obviously, it's harder to do in a living organism, so you work out certain details in a test tube, so to speak.

    2. Re:Read the small print by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I think there is a gap in medicine. You have scientists, technicians (doctors) but few engineers. If there were medical engineers they could take a device like this and package it for implantation. One obvious application would be an electronic bridge between two bunches of nerve cells.

    3. Re:Read the small print by master5o1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If there were medical engineers they could take a device like this and package it for implantation.

      There is such a field as Biomedical Engineering.

      --
      signature is pants
    4. Re:Read the small print by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Yep, those guys turn $5 pulse meter into $5k FDA-approved pulse measurement stall.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    5. Re:Read the small print by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Before jumping on this, read the small print.
      They take out a piece of brain tissue, and implant it into the machinery, not the other way around. I'm not sure about you guys, but that kind of interface doesn't seem too useful to me, although it could be useful for diagnosis.

      I rather suspect if it were the other way around, (implants for arbitrary interfaces) there would be a bit of a hue and cry. Especially when human subjects are discussed.

      Its the safe way to do the research without attracting the attention of political or religious groups.

      Its pretty patently clear that implantation is the ultimate goal, and this opens a whole can of worms best left unopened while the research is young.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Read the small print by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I think it's what is known as "an important first step".

      This was done with snails. Not exactly a first step.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Read the small print by Falconhell · · Score: 2, Funny

      Benji mouse :"It has to be prepared"

      Mouse 2: "Diced, We will replace it with an artificial brain, no-one will notice.

      Arthur Dent :"I will"

      Benji mouse: No you wont you will be programmed not to!"

    8. Re:Read the small print by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its pretty patently clear that implantation is the ultimate goal, and this opens a whole can of worms best left unopened while the research is young.

      Yeah, we'll keep it under the radar and let it gather lots of momentum, entrench itself in terms of research thus far invested, and then we'll spring open that can of worms. Surely that will avert the controversy concerning brain implants!

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    9. Re:Read the small print by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's call it "an important first slimy forward drag".

    10. Re:Read the small print by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      One small splort for a snail, one giant splertch for snailkind!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    11. Re:Read the small print by Barny · · Score: 1

      Ever read Anne McCaffrey brain/brawn books?

      Being able to remove a full brain, keep it on life support (the next step) and interface it to a computer would be rather useful I would have thought :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    12. Re:Read the small print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would have made password extraction from Terry Childs much simpler...

    13. Re:Read the small print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but maybe they can stimulate it to learn, say, kung fu, then fuse it to my right frontal lobe.
      Whoa.

    14. Re:Read the small print by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      yes, a can of worms would be open if you went against god! If god intended you to have chips in your brain, you would be born with them! just like speaking and writing!

      mbrlkjhjakd!

      --
      new sig
    15. Re:Read the small print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They clearly failed to follow through.

      I have yet to see even a snail-sized 'Mech.

      Unless ComSat is suppressing that info... Hm.

    16. Re:Read the small print by MacroMegaMan · · Score: 1

      You know, I've often wondered why we don't join some of our existing technologies together and get on with things. I know it may not be as simple as it sounds, but we have this tech already:

      http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/54170/title/Let_there_be_light
      (Allows for manipulation of neurons with light)

      http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl051811%2B
      http://nanotechweb.org/cws/article/tech/41146
      (Nanoscale OLED displays)

      http://www.egmrs.org/EJS/PDF/vo281/1.pdf
      http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=6802
      (Nanoscale light detectors)

      http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2108/zsj.22.535?journalCode=jzoo
      http://www.jove.com/index/details.stp?ID=2081
      (And we can stain cells with dyes that fluoresce when the cells experience activity now)

      We have peanut butter, jelly and bread. Why can't we get this all together to make a sandwich? Or is this currently in the works?
      Or am I missing something subtle, that someone who actually knows about this research can enlighten us about?

    17. Re:Read the small print by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I rather suspect if it were the other way around, (implants for arbitrary interfaces) there would be a bit of a hue and cry. Especially when human subjects are discussed.

      Besides, even if the technology cannot be made small enough for an inconspicuous implant, I reckon there's plenty of folks willing to wear a funky looking helmet/contraption on their heads if that means being able to send electrical impulses to their paralyzed lower body.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    18. Re:Read the small print by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      We have peanut butter, jelly and bread. Why can't we get this all together to make a sandwich?

      Becausw we're not American and it would make us sick?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Read the small print by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      I'ma take that with a grain of salt..

    20. Re:Read the small print by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      If the light could both be from the mechanical AND the biological side, you'd have quite a bit of confusion. You want different kinds of signals for input and output.

    21. Re:Read the small print by Syberz · · Score: 1

      They take out a piece of brain tissue, and implant it into the machinery

      Didn't they use semi-organic components in the computer (gelpacks I think) in Star Trek? I seem to recall an episode when the organic components of the computer caught a virus (real one, not computer) and that borked the systems of the ship.

      So yeah, my point is that using organic components in a computer seemed to achieve a rather important purpose in Star Trek so it stands to reason that what we are learning here could be useful.

      --
      ~Syberz
    22. Re:Read the small print by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      This is child's play, Jim.

    23. Re:Read the small print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would water-boarding, and its much cheaper.

  4. Vampire Plug by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What I really want is a vampire plug that sits on my optic nerve(s) and captures everything I see and records it to a hard drive. I would like it to automatically tag timestamps with my thoughts at the time, but that can wait for version 2.0.

    1. Re:Vampire Plug by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I really want is a vampire plug that sits on my optic nerve(s) and captures everything I see and records it to a hard drive.

      The Man would like you to have that too. I mean, if you have nothing to hide, why would you possibly be against it?

    2. Re:Vampire Plug by master5o1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only thing a Vampire plug would enable you to do is sparkle.

      --
      signature is pants
    3. Re:Vampire Plug by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      Moderated -1 Twilight Reference, 4 points left.

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
    4. Re:Vampire Plug by Starfleet+Command · · Score: 0

      YES!!! I have long had that wish.

    5. Re:Vampire Plug by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Side effects include: Abnormally high levels of chagrin, creepy girlfriend-stalking tendencies, halted semen production.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Vampire Plug by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      +1 Twilight Bashing more like it.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  5. Chemical dialogue by mevets · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought this sort of thing was quite difficult, without vapourizing the tissue and dropping it into a mass spectrometer. I know CSI can drop a grain of goop into a breadmaker and have it pinpoint every compound, dna profile and isotope distribution in a few seconds, but I kinda guessed that was a TV-ish thing.

    The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place. - GB Shaw

    1. Re:Chemical dialogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The device in question does not measure chemical signals directly. It measures the flow of ions "in" and "out" (through the membrane) of individual neurons. When one neuron communicates with a second neuron, typically the source neuron releases a chemical (neurotransmitter) onto the target neuron, where receptors sense the chemical and in response open ion channels (pores in the membrane). Ions (such as sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium) then pass through these channels, changing the potential difference across the target neuron's membrane. This fluctuation in membrane potential then propagates to other parts of the target neuron (passively, as well as actively with the help of other ion channels that sense the change in membrane potential).

      Many such fluctuations in membrane potential happen frequently in each neuron, and when they occur in the right combinations, they add up sufficiently to cross a threshold value (which varies from cell to cell) - once this threshold potential as been reached across the membrane in the main part of the neuron, a runaway cascade of further channel opening and closings is set in motion, resulting in a sudden, large spike in membrane potential. Such spikes are called "action potentials". They are essentially "digital" - they have a stereotypical time course, or shape, and are thought to encode information primarily by their existence (and not by their exact height or width). Like digital music (MP3), the advantage of such spikes is that no information is lost as they propagate to other parts of the cell, even though the spike is somewhat attenuated - as long as it is still recognized as a spike, it is still a "1", not a "0".

      When such a spike reaches the end of an axon (there is one axon, but it may have many branches), the arrival of this large and quick membrane potential fluctuation causes chemicals (neurotransmitters) to be released, which then may be sensed by receptors on a different neuron's membrane. And so we have reached the beginning (or end) of another cycle, and this is how the brain transmits and processes (most) information.

      The connection between two neurons is called a synapse, and is formed between the end of the axon from the source neuron and the (usually dendritic) membrane of the target neuron, which contains receptors. The source neuron is termed "pre-synaptic" and the target neuron "post-synaptic".

      Currently the most accurate way to measure the electrical state of a single brain cell is a technique called "whole-cell patch-clamp recording". This involves making contact between the tiny (about 2 micrometer diameter) tip of a glass pipette and the membrane of a neuron, forming a tight seal between these surfaces (usually with the help of suction, actually drawing part of the flexible membrane into the tip of the pipette), and finally rupturing the bit of the membrane within the tip. Now the inside of the pipette is contiguous with the inside of the neuron. Ionic solution in the pipette disperses into the neuron, and a fine wire extending from within the pipette out to an amplifier is used to measure the flow of ions between the solution inside the neuron+pipette and an electrode in the solution surrounding the brain cell (the "bath"). Achieving such a measurement configuration is delicate and difficult - just how difficult depends on the sample being studied: dissociated neurons (a soup), cultured neurons (a soup that then was allowed to regrow connections), neurons in thin slices of brain tissue, or intact brains of anesthetized or behaving animals.

      Various devices exist that can largely automate such "patch-clamp" measurements, but only for dissociated cells. This is mainly of use when, for example, testing the effect of drugs on neurons (or other types of electrically active cells). From what I can see of the chip mentioned here, it works for cultured neurons, which is an improvement. Perhaps something similar will, in the future, work for intact brain tissue - this is probably still years away. I find it more likely that such

  6. The soul by WarJolt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder if 100% of the brain is monitored and analyzed if somewhere in there we will finally find a soul.

    1. Re:The soul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure you do

    2. Re:The soul by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I wonder if 100% of the brain is monitored and analyzed if somewhere in there we will finally find a soul.

      I take the opposing view. Once we model all of a working mind I think we will be surprised to find out little is going on there in reality.

    3. Re:The soul by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      I take the view that the universe is 4-dimensional, but only on a microscopic (or smaller) scale; an atom or molecule or even something smaller (quantum sized) might have a depth or "space" attached to it (which can be altered by manipulations/chemistry), but unless you can combine and expand these spaces with extremely small, precise mechanisms (cells), there is no way to make it workably large. Once you have a large cellular network, though, it may be possible.

      So more or less, I theorize that we have no current way of detecting it, but it is there, and it can only exist because of biology. If I'm right, and we ever figure that fact out in any way that allows engineering, we will have learned something VERY interesting.

      I don't claim to know enough actual physics to be able to back that up, though.

    4. Re:The soul by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take the view that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively; life is just a dream and we are all imaginations of ourselves.

      Here's Tom with the weather.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    5. Re:The soul by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Seems more like a gaia dreaming of her father. How else do you explain the complete and utter superiority of women coupled with the ubiquitous nonsensical dominance of the tragic male figure?

      That being said, you sound like a kook, homeboy!!! Keep on. ;)

    6. Re:The soul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems more like a gaia dreaming of her father. How else do you explain the complete and utter superiority of women coupled with the ubiquitous nonsensical dominance of the tragic male figure?

      That being said, you sound like a kook, homeboy!!! Keep on. ;)

      The GP is a direct reference to Bill Hicks. And if you want to learn something about women and men and dominance, try reading Macbeth sometime. The superiority women have is that they are superior manipulators who don't like to do their own dirty work.

    7. Re:The soul by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      Moderated +1 Bill Hicks Reference, 3 points left.

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
    8. Re:The soul by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I wonder if 100% of the brain is monitored and analyzed if somewhere in there we will finally find a soul.

      No, and when we don't all the religionists will just say that it's not a physical object or process, so they never expected to find it anyway.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:The soul by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      We already learn that the day after each election.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    10. Re:The soul by dgower2 · · Score: 1

      We already believe that because the bible said it thousands of years ago. Please, continue to expose your complete lack of knowledge regarding Christianity (which in not "religion" to true Christians).

      It's not the brain that causes a husband to make sacrifices for his wife and children; when I wrap my arms around my beautiful wife and tell her that I missed her, it wasn't my brain that caused that; when someone finds a wallet full of cash and returns it to its owner with the same amount of cash in it, it's not because his synapses fired in a certain order/pattern.

      Who we are is not the handfull of elements that make up our physical bodies, or the chemical interactions that occur in the gray matter. We all have a soul, which was designed to live forever. Once the shell takes it's last breath, the soul will continue... Where it continues is a simple decision every one of us will make before we die.

      Of course, if you don't believe this "nonsense", please live your life to the fullest while you're here, because this is all you have.

      Psalm 19:1 1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.

      --

      Proverbs 21:19 It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman.

    11. Re:The soul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you define "soul?"

      It means different things to different people. And the differences are significant in determining whether or not you are likely to find it. For example:

      "The part that feels loving/compassionate emotions and a sense of the asthetic" will probably be easy to find, and mostly consist of the lymbic system.

      "A non-material ghost that lives on after the body dies" probably won't be found there.

  7. xkcd by Luke+Wilson · · Score: 1, Funny

    obligatory xkcd

  8. okaygoods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technology is progress too fast. Really incredible.dofus kamas

  9. Kiss my medulla oblongata. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The neurochip is able to monitor the electrical and chemical dialogue between brain cells, and to track subtle changes in brain activity.

    So, resistance is futile, conductance useful.

    I'm looking forward to version 2.0, otherwise know as Harvey (for all you Farscape fans).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Kiss my medulla oblongata. by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      So, resistance is futile, conductance useful.

      But with too much reluctance comes great impedance.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  10. The chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making a chip that measures chemical or electrical changes in the brain is easy. Anyone with a little knowledge about electronics and chemistry can build a large scale prototype, and with enough money you can make it small enough to be implantable. The trick is getting it to use very little power (less than 1uA average) and getting FDA approval.

    Electrical changes in the brain are typically 100nV-1mV and 10kHz (depending on what you're looking for). You can measure what's going on by hooking up a pair of wires to brain tissue, amplify the signal using an instrumentation amplifier with a high pass filter, and then sample the resulting voltage with an ADC.

    For chemical changes you usually apply a voltage waveform and measure the current (this depends on the chemical). The current response can indicate the presence of a certain chemical and changes to the current waveform can indicate concentration (this is called Voltammetry). This can be done with a few opamp's, a sense resistor and an ADC. The article doesn't mention a lot of specifics, so I guess they could also be referring to rheoencephalography (sweep the frequency of a sine/pulse waveform and measure phase shift and amplitude reduction as it's across brain tissue).

    1. Re:The chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha. A very insightful post, but you reveal yourself Mr. A.C., or should I say Doctor Evil?!

      Your attempt to stimulate thought in your peers tells all: your shallow moralistic scientific bent towards empowerment; your obvious belief that because a thing may be conceivable that it is safe to 'think' 'about!' Did you think you could hide that from us? That you think? It cannot be hidden!

      Where does this 'think' 'about' come from? Muslim extremists, of course. Those fuckers invented *zero*. Think we would be in all this scientific trouble with the tubez delivering WMDs to children if there was no zero? That's right brothers, imagine there's no zero, it is easy if you try.

      The fact is that children are being encouraged to do this goddamn Muslim 'think' 'about' stuff by posts like yours Dr. Evil, and we, the people of the United States of America plan to stop you.

      First Wikileaks, then the world, then our own country again cause we can't run it while doing the other two!!! But don't worry, we will be back!

  11. There is one in Orbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no need for implants, just use SLF/ELF waves

  12. sounds cool where are the Bionic arms and legs? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    sounds cool where are the Bionic arms and legs?

    1. Re:sounds cool where are the Bionic arms and legs? by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the trunk of the flying car. :P

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    2. Re:sounds cool where are the Bionic arms and legs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, kind of:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6R5bm6qx2E

      Targeted Muscle Reinnervation
      Targeted Sensory Reinnervation
      Todd Kuiken
      Jesse
      RIC

  13. Mind reading by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    With individual brain cells you won't get anything close to that. Even trying at will of doing something, probably won't be very useful, will be more like getting slow binary signals or morse code. And raising the number of cells should be not help, your concience just works at another level, would be like hiting with a building a touchscreen of the size of the iphone.

    1. Re:Mind reading by catbutt · · Score: 1

      True, but take a look at a relay or vacuum tube of 75 years ago, compared to a silicon transistor today. That's about where we are with this stuff.

      My guess is that a lot of information goes from one side of the brain to the other via the corpus callosum, and if you could monitor just that traffic (which is still massive), you could gather a lot. Making sense of it is a different matter. I don't think its unreasonable to think that they might be able to do it in 100 years though.

    2. Re:Mind reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monkeys are currently able to control some muscles in their arms and hands "telepathically", by means of brain implants that measure signals from (roughly 100) individual brain cells, decode the combinations of these signals and convert to electrical stimulation of the muscles. Like an expensive jumper cable, for patients where the original conducting pathway (the nerves) have been severed (spinal cord injury).

      This works. It is now a matter of supporting more fine-grained control over more muscles, over long periods of time without fatigue, and in ways that pose little danger to the patient.

      The point being - the research has found that using signals from 100's of individual brain cells is more reliable than aggregate signals from 1000's of brain cells combined (averaged).

  14. Not a Bridge by Derosian · · Score: 1

    A bridge allows passage both ways, this allows the machine to read the cells, the other problem seems to be it applies to cells outside the brain, although I suppose an implant is the next step.

  15. Sci Fi comes to life... by logistic · · Score: 1

    Ah we'll see something like Interface (ISBN: 0553372300) is just a few short year. Kinda like fusion as a practical source of electricity...

    1. Re:Sci Fi comes to life... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Or Terminal Man?

  16. Imortality by jbssm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe this will be an easier way to immortality than any genetic treatment.

    If you think about, from the moment on that you can store you memories and later thoughts in a chip, just like you do in your brain, how can you distinguish between what goes on in your biological brain and digital one? Where is the barrier?

    I know we are still far from that time. Perhaps decades at the best, but just think about the philosophic implications of that and how the concept of life, intelligent life and humanity will need to be re-defined.

    It's a "brave new world".

    1. Re:Imortality by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          A person is a sum of their memories from birth to present. Every moment is training us to be who we are, intentionally or otherwise. Through every seemingly unrelated event, we become the person who we are.

          If the memories and the relationships we form between those memories and the way things work, are recorded precisely and could be transferred to another body, we would achieve immortality. More precisely, each generation these memories are transferred to would be an extension of ourself. The previous self would die, but the subsequent self would retain all the training and be allowed to expand on it.

          The problem would then be, if we were transferred at death, to a new self who was yet to be born, would the time in the resulting self allow for us to maintain our sanity? A person can be driven insane pretty quickly through various brainwashing methods including torture. An isolation tank, where you feel like you're floating in body temperature fluid, free of visual and audio sensory input, can drive a person mad. 9 months in such a place (the womb), followed by a year or more in a form that is unable to communicate or control our physical form, could easily make you into a babbling idiot.

          Imagine being locked in a tank, where you are fed intravenously. You cannot see anything but blackness. You cannot hear anything except the steady rhythm of a machine. Your lungs are full of fluid, but your blood is oxygenated by an outside source. You cannot scream. Any attempts to escape are countered by the fact that the tank you are in is padded where you cannot breach it, and you can find no escape.

          We've all lived through it once, and we don't remember it. I'm not quite sure I'd want to go through it again, even if it only through the implantation of my lifetime of experiences. While it may be a great advance for the next generation of myself to already have these experiences, there have been a lot of things that I wish I'd never experienced, and wouldn't want to curse anyone else with. They are my demons that I have to live with. We all have them. Those who say they don't are lying to themselves. I'd rather let the next form of myself come into the world a blank slate, with no memories or experiences from the past.

       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Imortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it seems to me that the early-age brain plasticity is a very important step for adaptation into this ever-moving world. Just look at how children are able to learn new languages, or how they take some things for granted and are seem able to come up with new ideas we are just not hard wired to have. Skipping this step by forcing memories onto a fresh brain is not going to help with humanity improvement if you ask me.

      You're more than just the sum of your memories, you're also how your brain got wired throughout your life, how you emotionally react faced with situations, which is more about the subconsciousness. Just manipulating memories is not a step for immortality, simply another way of spreading knowledge at best. Which is cool already.

    3. Re:Imortality by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What you guys are missing is that everyone's synapses connect differently, and no two paople have the same number of neurons; even identical twins'. You would first have to have an exact duplicate of your brain, both structurally and chemically, before you could transfer your memories and have the new being be you.

    4. Re:Imortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you think about, from the moment on that you can store you memories and later thoughts in a chip, just like you do in your brain, how can you distinguish between what goes on in your biological brain and digital one? Where is the barrier?

      The flesh brain is still full of chemical soup influencing its operation, and is interacting with the rest of the body. You'd have to accurately simulate all of those inputs too, or it wouldn't "feel" right. (Imagine no hormones, no adrenaline.) I'm not sure how sleep would work out once a large enough percentage of your total brain was machine, either; as far as we know, a lot of the sleep process is biological, so it might not work right if, say, 10% of the brain is machine and not responding to the chemical signals and keeps insisting to the other 90% that it's awake. Yet that 90% still needs its sleep every night.

      Another rough spot is that the machine brain would, of course, have to be able to do all the same stuff the flesh brain does. Including being able to make new connections - otherwise it has no ability to absorb new information.

      In other words, the new experiment shows we can probably *interface* with the brain, and possibly someday *augment* the brain, but it says nothing at all about whether we can *replace* the brain.

  17. Obligatory by JoshDM · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our microchipped brainiac overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No obligatories are obligatory! Please, enough with the nonobligatory obligatories.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read all these posts just for this one....... Love it!

    3. Re:Obligatory by daveime · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, this one post reads you !

      Have a nice day.

  18. "socialized medicine" by FranTaylor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Opponents of "socialized medicine" argue that capitalism is necessary for cutting-edge medical research, here is an example of the opposite.

    1. Re:"socialized medicine" by dreampod · · Score: 1

      Though it may come as a surprise if you had listened to the republicans lately but Canada is actually a capitalist society and while we 'socialize' the cost of it, the fact of the matter is it is good solid capitalist sense to do so because we pay vastly less for better outcomes and manage to cover everyone simultaneously.

      However the research for this project is out of the University of Calgary and is not funded by our health care system but through the standard mix of research grants, university funds, and private partnerships that you would get out of any US post secondary institution.

  19. Everyone will be an Einstein/Shakespeare/Mozart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! But being of modest means, I'm afraid I'll have to settle for ad-supported circuitry.

  20. Skull Jack In The Future? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    I forget if it was a Shadowrun book, or a William Gibson novel, but one of the protagonists had been captured, and the bad guys had cheerfully plugged THEIR equipment into the hero's skull jack. Think "A Clockwork Orange", only without the need for eyedrops.

    You really don't want an implant that can allow someone to root your brain.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Skull Jack In The Future? by Caledfwlch · · Score: 1

      William Gibson's "Neuromancer"

      --
      These views express my own personal opinions, not those of the other voices in my head
  21. Implanted into a certain ex-governor from Alaska by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Funny

    Another Bridge to Nowhere...

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  22. Wonder if I could get a grant... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    ...to study these devices under varying physical conditions...say, a determinate study to isolate the fractional conductivity effects of Grey Goose vs. Jägermeister...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  23. Re:Implanted into a certain ex-governor from Alask by dreampod · · Score: 1

    *Golf clap*

    Bravo sir.

  24. We are the Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you will be assimilated, resistance is futile

  25. False alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, I almost read it as 'Scientists developed brains'. I could have presented some of those as birthday gifts to my boses!

  26. Oh Please, Please!... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Get 535 of these ready for implant and equipped with a basic math & econ101 enhancement module and send them on your fastest aircraft along with a team of implant technicians to Washington DC.

    Stat!!

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  27. I for one by speculatrix · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our new implanted-micro-chip-augmented human overlords.

  28. Star Trek or Star Wars? by tepples · · Score: 0

    Resistance is Futile. Prepare to be assimilated.

    Borg motto.

    padme

    Queen Amidala's civilian name.

    I got the "ohm" part (resistance), but is there a reason you mixed Star Trek and Star Wars allusions?

  29. Bodily-fluid-proofing by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yep, those guys turn $5 pulse meter into $5k FDA-approved pulse measurement stall.

    That's $5 for the meter and $4,995 for bodily-fluid-proofing and the sort of testing needed for a warranty. We went over this the last time someone recommended using mass-market consumer electronics as a medical device.

  30. Learning language and escaping from womb by tepples · · Score: 1

    Imagine being locked in a tank, where you are fed intravenously. You cannot see anything but blackness. You cannot hear anything except the steady rhythm of a machine.

    One plot point in Mr. Holland's Opus is that the human womb transmits sound. It's low-pass filtered, but it's enough to make human babies react differently to the rhythms and tone contours of the mother's language than to those of a foreign language.

    Any attempts to escape are countered by the fact that the tank you are in is padded where you cannot breach it

    This study claims that the child's lungs send the birth signal when the child is ready to escape.

  31. The MAFIAA by tepples · · Score: 1

    What I really want is a vampire plug that sits on my optic nerve(s) and captures everything I see and records it to a hard drive.

    Don't watch any vampire movies in this state, or one or more MPAA members will try to slay you.

  32. Do Beowulf Clusters of Humans make God plausible? by Vesuvias · · Score: 1

    I have always been most curious on what impact direct machine brain interfaces would have on Human communication. If we can communicate thought, feeling, and memory at the speed of light where is the barrier between you and I? Where do I stop and you begin? Would the direct connection of billions of humans to one another form a self aware super intelligence?

    There are times where I feel this may be our only chance at survival as a race. If we don't unify to the point where each one of us sees that harming another human is the same as harming ourselves then as technology advances a single misguided human may be able to do enough harm to destroy the entire species.

    This then seems to have weird parallels to religious teachings, the golden rule comes to mind. Selflessness versus Selfishness; a common theme across a lot of religions.

    But if we could form the equivalent of a God-like intelligence. Does that make the idea of God at least more plausible? If God is plausible and religions have been "training" us morally for a day when clustering was technologically possible, that would be rather... interesting.

    Admittedly this is a bit more optimistic and pro-religious than is customary for slashdot but these are MY random bits of waxing imaginative dammit....

  33. Time to Start the OS Interface Project? by AbominousSalad · · Score: 1

    I'm a tinfoil hat wearing freak on my worst days, but any fear of this project is trumped by my William Gibson fanboy-isms and my desire to keep my career moving long after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome cripples my hands. In all seriousness - does this announcement constitute a good reason to start working on the scaffolds for a new DNI-based X desktop?

    --
    Every trollism an AC posts is prefixed, in my mind, with "A. Coward whined, in a weak and cowardly voice:"
  34. I can't wait that long by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I sure wish that we could get more insight as to what it monitors and how we can use that to our advantage...brain chemistry being a big part in so many brain illnesses, i think sometimes it may well be the door to a healthier tomorrow...as well, making a chip interface to hook up to your computer is finally here...count me in...

  35. Re:Everyone will be an Einstein/Shakespeare/Mozart by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    "Hey there Dave, nice weather we're having. *twitch* WE SHOULD GO BUY SOME PEPSI! *twitch* Whoa, what just happened?"

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  36. Snow Crash by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

    This could eventually lead to direct neural interaction with the Internet (or its future outgrowth, the Metaverse)... Beware of the Snow Crash

  37. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I DID NOT MURDER HIM! *bangs fists on table*

    -Sonny (I Robot)