Slashdot Mirror


Google Introduces New Android Features

adeelarshad82 writes "Google introduced the next generation of interaction with its Android operating system by introducing a set of new features. The most prominent one is the voice-driven actions. Google executives outlined 12 new 'Voice Actions for Android,' including phone calls, reminder e-mails, direction search, and music search. The app is called 'Voice Search,' requires Android 2.2, and is available in the Android Market now. Voice actions can be triggered by clicking the 'microphone' icon on the screen. Saying 'call John Smith at home' will trigger the contacts list and voice dialer, 'find art museums in Amsterdam' would launch a Google Maps application, and 'listen to Ace of Base' will search for music from the artist on Pandora, Last.fm, or another music application. Another improvement worth a mention is 'Chrome to Phone,' allows users to click on a new 'mobile phone' icon to send links, YouTube videos, even directions, to the phone. So far, the features are exclusive to Android phones and US English, although the capabilities will be moved to other languages and other operating systems (including the iPhone) in the future." Add reader CWmike: "JR Raphael takes a first look at Voice Actions for Android, and tells you how to get voice control even if you are not on Froyo."

37 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Please don'd die by pirot · · Score: 5, Funny

    My most common command to my Google Nexus phone is: "Please (beeeeep) battery, do not die. It's been just 3 hours since I fully charged you." I hope that the next generation of Android will teach the phone to obey.

    1. Re:Please don'd die by Jesterboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      My most common command to my Google Nexus phone is: "Please (beeeeep) battery, do not die. It's been just 3 hours since I fully charged you." I hope that the next generation of Android will teach the phone to obey.

      You're exaggerating by quite a bit or you have a broken phone. I got ~30 hours on a single charge running stock Nexus One ROM. I am currently running Cyanogenmod 6.0-RC2, and after 8.5 hours of a few calls, a few Youtube/Flash videos and a whole lot of internet browsing I still have 71% charge left.

      Maybe you have the brightness cranked to the highest setting? Enabling Automatic Brightness (Settings->Display->Brightness in Cyanogen; probably the same in stock) will make the biggest difference in battery life. Although, even running it at the highest brightness setting, I've managed somewhere over 12 hours of time after a full charge.

    2. Re:Please don'd die by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use my droid all damn day, it gets charged over night. If I watched flash videos for maybe 3 hours that might do it. The GPS is a real killer though, I just plug it in when its in the car dock.

    3. Re:Please don'd die by Thinboy00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, that person should turn in their geek card; who hasn't used a smartphone continuously for an extended period of time?

      --
      $ make available
    4. Re:Please don'd die by victorhooi · · Score: 3, Informative

      heya,

      Actually, I don't think he's necessarily lying, he just didn't give enough details on what exactly he's doing with it. No need for the Android fanboys to go lynch him because he insulted your dear Android...haha...

      I have a new Google Nexus One, and the battery life is appalling - I get maybe what, around eight hours, before it's down to the 15% warning? This is on automatic brightness, the occasional web surfing, some SMS-ing and light calls, and no wifi. Also, this is in the city, with nearly full reception (in low reception areas, I assume it boosts transmit power). I'm essentially permanently tethered to either the dock on my desk, or a handy power point *sigh*.

      My best friend also has one (we bought it together), and her battery life is similarly appalling, although slightly better since she turns the brightness down to minimum, and doesn't really make any calls.

      I love the phone, I just wish the battery life wasn't so abysmal.

      Cheers,
      Victor

  2. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if this will work as good as my Google Voice recognition... recent message: "Not long way because I thought they were. What slobs. I know that there is You know one before the other but sorry about the got a computer Yeah, and Over. For for."

    Can't wait to see these voice actions in action!

    1. Re:Yay by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have not been doing that recently, all the android phones have google navigation instead of the verizon thing.

  3. Part of the bluetooth voice dialing by stevew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This feature is really part of the upgrade to the bluetooth stack me thinks. Up until now, there was no way to do voice dialing with Android phones. There was a problem in the bluetooth stack (as explained by a little birdie who lives at google to me some months ago.) Android 2.2 can now perform this action even though my old Samsung phone has had the feature for 2 years Plus..

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
    1. Re:Part of the bluetooth voice dialing by sharkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Motorola Droid does "Voice Dialing", in that you select the voice dial app by hand, speak a command, then acknowledge any prompts by hand. It does not do hands free voice dialing (wired or bluetooth) in the manner that many phones have been doing for 5 years and more: Touch button on hands-free kit and interact totally by voice.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Part of the bluetooth voice dialing by CNeb96 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This feature is really part of the upgrade to the bluetooth stack me thinks. Up until now, there was no way to do voice dialing with Android phones.

      No this feature always came with android 2.2 but most reviews didn't cover it for some reason.

      http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.2-highlights.html

  4. Just need to shrink it down a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    *tap*

    Picard to Enterprise.

    1. Re:Just need to shrink it down a little by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Always wondered. Why do they have to give origination data. One would think that the communicator already knows it is one Picard.

      It should just be *tap*

      Enterprise.

      Yes captain?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:Just need to shrink it down a little by RedK · · Score: 2, Funny

      *TAP*

      "Enterprise, beam me up"

      "Uh who's this ?"

      "Picard, don't you have call display ?"

      "I don't stare down at the monitor sir, everything is voice activated around here, I'm not even near the console".

      "Ugh, Beam me up".

      "Right after my coffee break, Union rules. Enterprise out".

      "Wait, who are you ?"

      *TAP*

      "Hello ? Enterprise ?"

      Yeah, origin doesn't matter.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  5. Executives by adewolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do these companies insist on having executives being their spokespersons. No one trusts them or believes a word out their mouths.

    --
    "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
  6. Be sure to uninstall Chrome to Phone beta first by deep9x · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you had it previously installed, it'll silently just error out when you try to install the Marketplace version. Hopefully this comment will save 10 minutes of going "WTF?"

  7. Improving battery life would be a better strategy by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I congratulate Google on this achievement, I think Google and Android would be better served if there were better results when it comes to today's Android phones and battery life.

    Just imagine what the the headline "Android phones can now maintain battery capacity at greater than 80% after an average day of use" would create.

    The buzz and positive publicity with this kind of information would be priceless.

  8. The next Android ad by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny
    User: "Tea. Earl Grey. Black"

    Android Phone: "Here I am, brain the size of a planet..." *Sigh*

    Hold on, maybe that's the new iPhone ad...

  9. 'listen to Ace of Base' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will trigger a pop-up on you calendar that says - in effect - "It is no longer 1996."

    1. Re: 'listen to Ace of Base' by straponego · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it'll play Motörhead, which is what you should have said anyway, you big girl's blouse.

  10. Can it answer questions? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actions are nice, but so is the ability to ask questions.

    On my iPhone, if I'm listening to my music, I can ask "What song is this?" and the phone will tell me the name of the song and the band playing it.

    1. Re:Can it answer questions? by thewils · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, if you are like most of the people I've seen with an iphone you could ask any of the twenty people sat near you. They'll probably tell you who it is too.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  11. Re:Voice control by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative
    How much voice control? "Find nearest gas station" sounds like a handy thing to do, without trying to peck away at a (virtual) keyboard while driving. (We'll assume the driver is using a dash mount). Does the iPhone do this? Maybe it does, I wouldn't know.

    Of course, it all hinges on how well it actually works. My Garmin 60 CS has the ability to search for "points of interest" (including gas stations). But searching is so clunky and inaccurate - especially compared to what we're now used to with google maps - you only use it when you really must.

  12. Ahh, nothing beats the voice activation by m2shariy · · Score: 2, Funny
  13. Now, on to fixes by Anomalyx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While Google tends to be better than others at prioritizing fixes vs enhancements, they seem to not be doing as well here.
    This achievement is certainly commendable, and congrats to Google on making an advanced voice command platform. But come on, I still can't set SMS or email reminders on my Google Calendar in the Calendar app! Or on the Google Calendar mobile site, for that matter!
    Sorry for picking on Calendar, but that's one thing that bugs me, because I use it all the time and have to either get on a computer or fumble around on the desktop site on my phone if I want to set my reminders.
    Oh yeah, battery life would be nice, too.

    --
    No, there is no "-1 I'LL NEVER ADMIT BEING WRONG!!!" mod.
    1. Re:Now, on to fixes by rotide · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, for all the good Google has done on Android, one of my biggest pet peeves is something so simple, yet they haven't fixed it yet.

      Being able to move emails into folders through the mail app while using an exchange email server. This simple function basically neuters any real work email functionality. In their online tracker it is listed as a feature request and not a bug. Go figure.

  14. Re:apple by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's much, much more powerful than what you see in the /. summary, and more powerful than what iPhone has. Yes, part of the update is overdue, but they went above and beyond.

  15. This isn't a new feature to Droid, it's an upgrade by funkylovemonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    The droid operating system has had voice commands for a long time now, my Droid 1 came with them back in December when I bought it. It's even been featured in commercials before. What this is isn't so much as a new program as it is a polished expansion of what was already there. They added more commands and those voice commands can now interact with other apps more easily. The voice recognition also seems improved, but I could be wrong since it was never a feature I used very much. The widget was also updated slightly. Really this is just one of many updates that have come with the release of 2.2 and the Droid 2.

  16. My Samsung Moment with Android 2.1 does this... by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 2, Informative

    With the search widget, which I assumed was built into Android itself, you can already do a myriad of similar tasks. I can call, pull up a contact, search, get directions, and more. I am *not* talking about Nuance, which Sprint also provides as their own app - I'm just talking about the generic search widget which takes either text or voice input. Is this new 'feature' just an improvement upon that, or is there some other nuance about the new service which I am missing?

    --
    William George
  17. Does this run locally or on Google's servers? by joh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Googles just trying to gather more data on their servers by beaming your voice to their servers which send commands back then? Or is this really running on your phone's hardware?

    1. Re:Does this run locally or on Google's servers? by joh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It needs the 3g, turns the voice into some hash then does a lookup.

      So Google sees what you're saying and stores it on their servers hanging off your Google account? The same with every page or map you send from Chrome to your phone? Yeah, this is the same then as with everything Google does here.

      1) Throw people a nice sweet bait
      2) Get their personal data
      3) Profit!

      I will start to consider Android as soon as Google starts to transfer and store all personal data encrypted, with no way to read it or to link it up with other personal data of mine, except those data points I want to have linked up. Right, and give me a way to browse ALL data that gets stored off my phone at Google and a way to delete it if I want to. This would be the very least that should be required from them.

    2. Re:Does this run locally or on Google's servers? by joh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people have incredibly, pathetically mundane lives and an over-inflated sense of how important they are - myself included. Seriously, we're not that interesting. As a data point, in an overall trend, we're probably useful to companies.

      But as some anonymous person over the internet. Get real.

      Yeah, there's very little to fear actually for the random individual, yet. It's the same as with some natives selling their lands to some foreign visitor for a handful of glass beads. What will he do, they think, take the land and carry it away? Want to have a few stones to go with it? lol, ha ha. Nice, shiny glassbeads! Give!

      So, if you're using Android with all the Google apps there's some place deep in a server farm where more and better data about your digital life is laying nicely prepared for analyzing it than you've got yourself, probably. It also shows to whom you connect, what you're searching for and about two thirds of all websites you visit. And all you've got from Google is "We're not evil!".

      With Google gathering more and more data from you they're also preparing a really nice monopoly. You can switch to any OS and device you like, as long as it has software supported by Google for their services. And of course right now they want to redefine net neutrality to keep the "Internet" neutral, except "additional services" (== Google apps) and the wireless net of course. -- "All these worlds, including your own, are ours, except these dusty moons of Mars, you can have those"

      And then: This is incredibly useful data also for governments. Knowledge is power and what Google piles up here is lots and lots of knowledge. I mean, your voice profile is *valuable* personal digital property. Your personal data is your land you live on in the dimension of intellectual property. Don't give it away for glass beads.

      Whatever. There can't be any harm in requiring Google to adhere to some clear rules (like letting you browse all the data they have from you, giving you full control over deletions, offer complete export options with common data formats and so on). Is this unreasonable?

      Mind you, I'm not saying what Google does should not be done. It's just progress, it's fascinating and it has as great a potential to change the world as the wheel or written language did. I just want to keep control over my part in it. It's mine after all.

    3. Re:Does this run locally or on Google's servers? by SnowZero · · Score: 3, Informative

      There can't be any harm in requiring Google to adhere to some clear rules (like letting you browse all the data they have from you, giving you full control over deletions, offer complete export options with common data formats and so on).

      Most of the data Google has on you that is indexed by your account is already available on the Google dashboard:
          https://www.google.com/dashboard/
      Some products are not yet supported (listed at the bottom). The Google Data Liberation Front is working toward making it complete:
          http://www.dataliberation.org/
      They are also working on safe methods of deletion (note that making this too easy allows account hijackers to hold data for ransom).

      Note that there are also google ad preferences which allow you to see and edit what the Google ad system thinks about you:
          http://www.google.com/ads/preferences/

  18. Re:Already here for awhile by sponga · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGbYVvU0Z5s
    I see they did at it for texting, I wish the summary would just have a link to the Youtube video as they describe everything in there. This is awesome because it truly means hands free, now I almost want to replace the camera button as a shortcut button for search as it would be convenient to get to everything. Some of the newer phones have a 'voice' button already built into the hardware interface.

    But this is brilliant "Send text to bill burgs lets meet outside the....", I wonder how this will hold up in court as 'hands free' while texting. But officer I wasn't texting I was voice texting. I wonder how bluetooth handsets will integrate with these features.

  19. Re:apple by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's very long overdue considering that voice commands have been in the most basic, cheap ass nokia feature phones for years, not to even mention smartphone line.

    I'm quite surprised no one complained about lack of those before. I can't even imagine not being able to tell my phone to call someone on my contact list when it's in my pocket and bluetooth earpiece is in its place. It just seems so... last millenium.

  20. Re:apple by pookemon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me know when the iPhone gets reception.

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
  21. Re:Would be interesting if Android was actually op by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The OS is open source, that is it. The market is not core functionality of the OS, you can make your own damn market. You have to get a license from redhat to use their repositories. Same fucking thing.

    Heck you can even get the apk and install it on your device that lacks the market.

  22. Settings / About phone / Battery use by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go to Settings / About phone / Battery use, and it'll show you exactly what's chewing up all your battery life.

    One of Android's best features.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?