Slashdot Mirror


What Happens To a Football Player's Neurons?

An anonymous reader writes "It seems like every week there's a new story about the consequences of all those concussions experienced by football players and other athletes — just a few days ago, the NY Times reported that some athletes diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's Disease may actually have a neural disease brought on by head trauma. But missing in these stories is an explanation of what head trauma actually does to the brain cells. Now Carl Zimmer has filled in the gap with a column that takes a look at how neurons respond to stress, and explains how stretching a neuron's axon turns its internal structure into 'mush.'"

176 comments

  1. So now instead of calling jocks meat-heads, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call the mush-heads.

  2. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    .........I didn't know athletes/footballers had neurons.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, isn't it? To a footballer, they are sort of like the appendix. Even though you don't really have any use for it, it is still there anyways. And like the appendix, a footballer's head tends to be full of shit.

    2. Re:Interesting... by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      The only thing we really know is that the big dumb jocks you meet in high school only get bigger and dumber.

    3. Re:Interesting... by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      when they lose their last neurons, they become politicians

  3. I did not know that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News flash: that big chunk of grey matter inside of our head is *fragile*. ORLY?

  4. True geniuses? by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yet there are people who argue that football is a game based on sophisticated strategies, that anyone able to play it proficiently must have an intelligence on the higher outliers of genius.

    Now it seems that "mushy" neurons are good enough...

    1. Re:True geniuses? by uniquename72 · · Score: 0

      Which people say that again? Fact is, nearly every decision is made by people who aren't even on the field. The players might as well be robots.

    2. Re:True geniuses? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      THAT would be cool! And if the robot players could have saws and hammers on their arms all the better!

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:True geniuses? by _merlin · · Score: 1

      The players don't have to be smart - they just have to memorise set plays. That doesn't require a great deal of intelligence.

    4. Re:True geniuses? by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Playbooks aren't designed during the game, and the execution plan is decided by the offensive co-ordinator on the sidelines.

      Arguably the players who suffer the most amount of concussions are the linemen, and I hate to generalize, but there is a reason these guys don't pick the plays.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    5. Re:True geniuses? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I completely disagree. No offensive scheme or technique on it's own is a match for a good linebacker or DB who can read offenses. And no defensive scheme or technique on it's own is a match for a good quarterback and skilled players who can read defenses and adjust on the fly. Linemen need to be able to make split second decisions and reads and adjust accordingly. I cannot reconcile your statement with reality at all.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    6. Re:True geniuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Which people say that again?

      It was a common thing back in the day to claim that black players were only suited to be linebackers, because the other positions in football required "too much intelligence." Now that black players have entered and excelled in those positions, sports people don't talk about that anymore.

      It's funny, back in the nineteen thirties, Jewish players dominated basketball, and sports commentators made up all kinds of racial Just-So stories to explain that, too. (Because just saying "they live in the ghetto, and there's not much to do but play basketball" wasn't interesting enough.) Like how the game required a great deal of cunning and misdirection, and that Jews were very sneaky and agile, so that's why they were the best at basketball.

        Uh...

        Yeah, I know. The intersection of race and sports is a curious place.

    7. Re:True geniuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing happens to a football players neurons He just isn't required to develop them.
      In the USA, He can get bogus High school and Colleges diploma as a gift,
      While having a true verbal and reading comprehension level of grade 5 or 6

      He doesn't need to learn like others ..all he needs is game!
      Anyone who thinks this isn't the case,Meet them and ask them basic things, but be ready to run,These peoples brains can run high on the reactive/reptilian side.

    8. Re:True geniuses? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The game could require strategy, but the strategist could be out of the field. In fact, the smart ones there and others that have that kind of risk (i.e. boxing) probably play in a way or another from ouside (managers, coachers, trainers, lawyers, etc).

    9. Re:True geniuses? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Have you seen a printout of a modern football playbook? It's usually a binder that looks big under an offensive lineman's arm.

    10. Re:True geniuses? by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      The playbook only tells you the general plan. In reality, players have to react to hundreds or thousands of variables. Dumb people don't make it in real football... which is not to say that real football players don't do some really dumb stuff, but then you should see what goes on after hours at Strings.

    11. Re:True geniuses? by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 1

      Most athletes need to make split second decisions, but as an athlete I can tell you that mostly comes from talent + practice. Do the smarter athletes excel when compared to equal talent? In my experience yes. But would I compare Peyton Manning with Albert Einstein? Would you?

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    12. Re:True geniuses? by jdoverholt · · Score: 1

      But would I compare Peyton Manning with Albert Einstein? Would you?

      Yes, yes I would. It's easy, looks like this:

      (with regards to intelligence) : Peyton Manning < Albert Einstein

      It's not an insult either, it's just the way it is.

    13. Re:True geniuses? by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Define "smart", experience has shown us that measuring intelligence as a single vector is folly. It does take a certain kind of intelligence to be able to quickly read and react to the changing conditions on the field. However that same intelligence may not necessarily be very applicable to designing a particle collider and vice-versa. To put it another way, you really cannot say that "Einstein was smarter than Mozart" because that statement really depends on how you define "smart". I'm sure if Einstein decided to become a composer he probably could have wrote something passable since he was quite intelligent, but I doubt it would have reached the level of Mozart. And I'm sure if Mozart was a scientist in the early 20th century he probably could have made a living at it but I doubt he would have excelled to the level of Einstein.

    14. Re:True geniuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing middle linebacker, I needed to reconcile the offense's set, their personnel, hours of studied game film, my coach's desires, our playbook, the down and distance, and my personnel on the field. Once those were reconciled, I had to call any changes necessary to the defense and prepare myself for the play. I had seconds to do this, and I did this dozens of times a game, often while under extreme physical duress, sometimes with thousands of people screaming for blood from the stands.

      Comparatively, my CS classes were a breeze.

    15. Re:True geniuses? by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Led Gardner places intelligence into eight groups. Logical, linguistic, spatial, musical, kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist. They're all lateral to each other. To this day, his idea on the subject is controversial.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re:True geniuses? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say what you said, but you said it better.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    17. Re:True geniuses? by xSander · · Score: 1

      The players might as well be robots.

      Wrong. The players on the field are the biggest variables.

    18. Re:True geniuses? by elmodog · · Score: 1

      I've heard that Einstein was pretty good at recognizing zone blitzes.

  5. Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    footballers have neurons???

  6. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They still have more sex than all slashdotters combined.

  7. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

    This thread is worthless without pics!

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  8. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Athletes who use steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs often have horribly shrunken and deformed testes and scrotums.

    So, you have to be really dumb to use steroids. The prosecution rests.

  9. feh by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is all just a conspiracy by the liberal media to destroy an American pasttime. There's still no REAL proof that football causes any blane dibblage.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:feh by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      What about Lou Gehrig? How many times could he have gotten hit in the head playing baseball? I would be not that many...

      --
        Windows Media Codec Pack

  10. Wa...? by oldhack · · Score: 1

    What they need neurons for?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Wa...? by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much everything, but to be able to rub the lotion on Giselle's back on the beach in Ipanema might be the simplest way to express it.

    2. Re:Wa...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... it rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again?

  11. So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Megahard · · Score: 0

    That Lou Gehrig died from Lou Gehrig's disease.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Maarx · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Darn right. What with all the repeat concussions from full-contact baseball injuries, it's a wonder he even made it as far as he did. I can't believe that barbaric sports like baseball are still practiced in modern society. They're just a step above the bloodletting of the Coliseum, if you ask me, what with all of the violence, injury, and frothing at the mouths that they encourage. If only there was a sport that used weapons, such as bats, for something other than hitting others. Or didn't involve ramming into others as you progressed from a start point, a first base, if you will, to an end point, such as a home. What I would give for a sport that didn't necessitate armoring its players as they headed into combat.

      Oh, wait...

    3. Re:So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your golf.

    4. Re:So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Entropy98 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:So maybe it wasn't just a coincidence by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Um, read the link just above yours. Gehrig went through college at Columbia on a Football scholarship. He played football before graduating, not baseball.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  12. Just football? by guppysap13 · · Score: 1

    Certainly there also has to be some damage done by banging heads on keyboards for years...

  13. American Football is not Football by hernol · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

    --
    http://twitter.com/bash_history
    1. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Thanks for clearing that up. We're talking about real football.

    2. Re:American Football is not Football by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, football (soccer here in the US) has risk factors of its own including heading the ball causes neuronal damage.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:American Football is not Football by BitterOak · · Score: 0

      Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

      American Football is real football, just as is Canadian Football. The rules are slightly different, but there's no reason to claim one is any more real than the other.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:American Football is not Football by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

      True. A medical story regarding non-American Football would likely cover one of these topics instead:

      1. How a nudge to the shoulder can translate into a compound leg fracture.
      2. How grabbing your shin while writhing on the ground can partially alleviate the pain of a compound leg fracture.
      3. Whatever is in those magical spray cans the trainers carry around, and how they can instantly heal a compound leg fracture immediately after a penalty has been awarded.

    5. Re:American Football is not Football by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

      I think you mean to say that we are talking about American Football and not Association Football, known to some by its abbreviated name soccer and to others simply as football. American Football is a ball game played on foot, and thus is very much a type of football. In fact Rugby is also football - hence the Rugby Football Union.

      See wikipedia's article on the word Football

    6. Re:American Football is not Football by ooshna · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah and injuries pulling a muscle pretending your hurt and in agony every time you fall.

    7. Re:American Football is not Football by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That's why that version of Football, as in where you kick around a white spherical ball with black pentagons, should only ever be referred to by its proper name: Soccer.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:American Football is not Football by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      Have you ever headed a soccer ball? They're extremely light. And while there's contact all the time, soccer players are too fast/agile to do much damage.

      I'm not so familiar with american football (looks like they wear a lot of padding), but there's no comparing soccer injuries to what see regularly in australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFy_kBEn5UY (fast forward to 50 seconds in).

    9. Re:American Football is not Football by labnet · · Score: 1

      Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

      You mean that sport where there wear so much padding, you could drop them off a 10 storey building with no ill effect.
      The rest of the world plays rugby!

      --
      46137
    10. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, football (soccer here in the US) has risk factors of its own including heading the ball causes neuronal damage.

      As others have pointed out, the ball is extremely light, and momentum is what counts. Not velocity. Your own link suggests that other encounters might explain the data.
      Also, while one data point doesn't prove anything, Frank Lampard is a famous footballer who has a very high IQ score (http://www.mensa.org.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=988&d=23&h=5&f=3). Please show me one American football player who has anything even close?

    11. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's why that version of Football, as in where you kick around a white spherical ball with black pentagons, should only ever be referred to by its proper name: Soccer.

      I agree. The rightful title of 'Football' should go to the sport where you carry an elliptical object with your hand and .. umm...

      Nevermind.

    12. Re:American Football is not Football by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      I think this hypothesis of yours should be tested, over and over again till high schools are once again safe for geeks.

    13. Re:American Football is not Football by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever headed a soccer ball?"

      Yes.

      "They're extremely light."

      So is a baseball. But I don't think you would want to take one to the head. And soccer balls can reach a significant fraction of the speed of a pitch. Head them wrong and they can cause real damage and broken bones (been there, done that). Done right they still cause damage.

      "And while there's contact all the time, soccer players are too fast/agile to do much damage."

      Then why is one of my friends suffering permanent brain damage from a concussion suffered in recreational soccer? One player's shoulder contacted my friend's head while attempting a fairly routine header. So much for his career as a medical doctor. Concussions are not unusual in soccer. I've had minor ones myself. Considering the collisions I've had as a keeper, it's amazing I haven't had more. It's the primary reason I no longer play. Soccer is a contact sport.

    14. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean handegg.

    15. Re:American Football is not Football by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, footballers almost die from a slight tap on the side of their foot. Surely a concussion would kill them outright.

      That is why in the USA it is a womans game. They have a higher pain threshold (sp?)

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    16. Re:American Football is not Football by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 0

      So... really we're talking about Handegg, not Football.

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
    17. Re:American Football is not Football by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I used to play and yes we do wear padding, but it's a pretty significant hit. First off the helmets we wear are hard, meaning they don't do a particularly good job of absorbing the impact. Secondly, football players are typically large and travelling quite fast. It's a significant hit that results in 2 180+ lbs., players each running in excess of 16 mph each. That's a pretty significant hit. And that's actually achievable even in high school, the pros can weigh more and run even a bit faster.

      A hit like that is a bit like hitting a brick wall going at arterial speeds. Unfortunately, the helmets are fairly thin and hard so it's really easy to get a concussion like that. I seem to recall seeing speculation a while back that the helmets might do more harm than good for that very reason. They don't absorb very much energy and whereas a motorcycle helmet would be thrown out and replaced after just one impact like that, football helmets get reused.

    18. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about Myron Rolle, who finished his undergraduate degree in pre-med in 2½ years and then studied at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar, and was drafted by the Titans last spring?

    19. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in my day, we used to use "miraculous" water, and it worked miracles. But now that we put it in spray cans... it's like 10 times better!!!!

      Now seriously, it's just an anti-inflammatory in spray.

    20. Re:American Football is not Football by xSander · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are head injuries in soccer as well, not because of heading the ball (though accidentally being in the way of a shot can cause concussions) but because of clashing heads.

    21. Re:American Football is not Football by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And while there's contact all the time, soccer players are too fast/agile to do much damage.

      Not really, it's just that football players are miraculous creatures, their bodies heal amazingly fast. Have you seen the number of times Ronaldo has had a fracture and been rolling around the ground in pain, and been up and running a minute later? Amazing.

    22. Re:American Football is not Football by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      American Football is a ball game played on foot, and thus is very much a type of football.

      So any game that involves one or more balls and allows its players to touch the ground with their feet qualifies as football? ;-)

      Roland Garros is gonna be so much more fun next year...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    23. Re:American Football is not Football by trialcode · · Score: 1

      Sorry, can't do that.
      In Sweden we mainly play what you refer to as 'Soccer', but we call it 'Fotboll'.
      I guess we could start calling the other kind 'Soccer' to add some spice to future international communications...

    24. Re:American Football is not Football by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      American football players are brutes who inflict violence on each other. Football players are thespians who treat us to fine displays of acting each week. I'd say that I'll stick with the fine arts but I don't give a crap about football either.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    25. Re:American Football is not Football by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      soccer is definitely a full contact sport. With the only protection gear used on your shins! This is why fouls are much more important in the game. In American football it hurts just as much. Even though there is heavy padding you still are hitting and getting hit by beasts of men. Also the better the protection technology gets the harder these players seem to hit each other. Similar effect in car airbags. Having the protection makes you care less about consequences so you go all out. This also hurts

      --
      Balderdash!
    26. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Men play American football. And they get paid enough money that I don't feel sorry for them.

    27. Re:American Football is not Football by elmodog · · Score: 1

      Yeah and injuries pulling a muscle pretending your hurt and in agony every time you fall.

      That is hilarious. I wish I had mod points.

    28. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its proper name has always been FOOTBALL. It was the original.

      All other codes of football came from it. Soccer was a derisive name conjured up by Rugby players who wanted to pretend that their code was 'football', when in actual fact their game was born out of a proper football (or soccer as they call it) match. American football followed that when two US Universities wanted to try out Rugby but had only heard a description of the game, and so had to make up some of their own rules to compensate not knowing the actual Rugby rules.

      As all other codes of football are derivative of the original 'Football' (aka soccer), they should be preceded with the name of their code to stop the confusion.
      Such as, 'American Football', 'Australian Rules Football', 'Gaelic Football', 'Canadian Football', 'Rugby League Football' and 'Rugby Union Football'. [Not sure of there are any other forms of football, but I've played American, Aussie Rules, Rugby Union, Rugby League and PROPER football]. They're all great sports and a lot of fun.

      But please, don't show your ignorance by thinking that SOCCER was ever the proper name for football.

    29. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Italians will disagree. They are constantly falling down from mysterious injuries and calling out for their mama. :-P

      On a serious note, bullshit you can't get injured in football. I saw a girl completely shatter another girls leg while trying to swipe the ball. It seriously looked like something out of a horror movie, there was so exposed bone and blood squirting everywhere. To this day it's still the most disturbing thing I've ever seen.

    30. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world plays real football ... the one with the round ball.

      Only a few nations play Rugby at any high level (and I am assuming you mean UNION, as opposed to League).

      If you're going to include all the nations that play Rugby, even the crap nations, then you'll find that there are almost as many that play American football. They even have a 'World Cup' of sorts for American Football. [I had a possible chance to play for Australia back in about 1995 when they held it in Spain, but I didn't go. I think over 50 nations competed in the competition that year ... not sure how many do now].

      As for the padding, it doesn't stop you getting hurt, it only stops you getting killed. (and even that sometimes doesn't work).
      I broke my ribs one year and they were going to amputate my foot (same year ... injuries at opposite ends of the season).

      Too many hits to the knees too with metal helmets. The helmets stop your head from cracking open. I used to often get caught on the line between two offensive linemen and I'd hear my helmet making cracking sounds.
      One of the guys on my team was the first to break a kraylite helmet (a plastic five times stronger than steal). Riddel offered him money for the helmet because it had never happened before. (We used to call the guy 'Steamtrain' because he used to hit so hard).

      Yes, Union is a tough game. I've played that too and having your eyes gouged and head stomped on (without a helmet) takes tough players.

      League is not as tough as either American football or Union (yes, I've played that too), they don't hit anywhere near as hard as American football players.
      Aussie rules players don't tackle as hard as American football players either. And football (soccer) can be bad if the tackles are bad. I've seen players get two broken legs from a bad tackle.

      So claiming, 'no ill effect', just shows you have never played American football and don't realise how hard they REALLY hit.

    31. Re:American Football is not Football by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps along with the AC, American Football is named after what happens to the ball at the beginning of each half, after each 4 downs or after a touchdown? When the ball is launched through the air off the implement at the end of a person's leg commonly called a foot?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    32. Re:American Football is not Football by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    33. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to point out, in the US, only girls play soccer.

    34. Re:American Football is not Football by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. To add on to GP, possible hand muscle locks from excessive finger pointing.

    35. Re:American Football is not Football by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Ah, the infamous handegg comment. Analogous to Godwin for football topics.

    36. Re:American Football is not Football by ooshna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think I got -1 Troll from a pissy European.

    37. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they do not play on horseback so it would qualify as Football.

    38. Re:American Football is not Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to point, we are talking about American Football, not Football. It's not the same.

      You mean that sport where there wear so much padding, you could drop them off a 10 storey building with no ill effect.
      The rest of the world plays rugby!

      FIFA has more entries to the World Cup than there are countries in the United Nations. Rugby Union is played by more countries than Rugby League despite League giving us Elle Macpherson.

    39. Re:American Football is not Football by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Similar situation in Bulgaria, though we usually call american football what it is - rugby.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    40. Re:American Football is not Football by labnet · · Score: 1

      Wish you hadn't posted AC, because it was a great post!

      --
      46137
  14. The amount of replies to this story by Anarki2004 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The number of replies to this story seems to indicate that perhaps a vast majority of slashdotters don't particularly like football players. I was actually hoping for some technical insight and whatnot, but it would seem everybody is still maintaining the same attitude they had in high school.

    --
    The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    1. Re:The amount of replies to this story by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
      I had a chemistry teacher as an undergrad who played football (American kind) in college. He said his adviser gave him a hard time because "chemistry majors shouldn't play football".

      My orthodontist played football in HS and college. He always advised kids not to play it: knee damage, concussions, damage to teeth and jaw - mouth guards only give you so much protection.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    2. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny thing is, at least in places (not Texas) that don't take high school football too seriously, football is an excellent opportunity for a nerd to get into the "in" crowd.

      In fact, it's how I became "cool." It didn't matter how well you played or how annoying or ugly you were, as long as you survived hell week and stuck with the team, you were in with the cool people(and, by extension, the juniors and seniors and the parties that they threw and all the pussy surrounding that whole scene). You were allowed to scream, cuss, punch lockers, high-five, whatever you had to do to shrug off the pain...as long as you took your hits and didn't cry like a bitch on the field.

      Plus, a working knowledge of sports makes it much easier to bond with others and make new friends. And, of course, the health benefits. Now if only those damn San Diego Chargers would quit taking bribes and fucking up in the playoffs so I can see them win at least one super bowl before I die.

    3. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technical insight? You're looking for 2001-Slashdot. I'd give you directions, but you can't get there from here.

    4. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everybody knows that the only healthy thing you can do is to sit at a desk with a computer for 50 years!!

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    5. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIt's not that Slashdotter don't like Football players , Slashdotter are realists.
      Few of us would survive as media or lawmakers . We're not full of crap or ourselves
        Maybe they just make us realize that it takes very little brains to be a football player .A fan wont like those facts
       

    6. Re:The amount of replies to this story by dawgs72 · · Score: 1

      I'm also a former football player. I enjoyed all the perks you mentioned as well.

      One thing I didn't enjoy were multiple concussions while playing. I believe in 3 years of starting games I had 5 concussions. That's not even counting the 2 in middle school/youth league. After one particularly bad concussion I forgot what had happened the previous week. If that can happen in the short term to someone who just played 12 years, I can only imagine what happens in the long term to professional athletes.

    7. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technical insight...

      slamming your body forcefully into other large objects on a daily basis is not healthy.

      There... theres your insight.

      What... not insightful? Pff... the football players havent figured it out yet...

    8. Re:The amount of replies to this story by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      I have 6 concussions to my name. The only bone I have ever broken is my head. I now have brain cancer... perhaps there is a connection. ???

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    9. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...but it would seem everybody is still maintaining the same attitude they had in high school.

      If anything, my experiences have taught me that it was then - and still is - a perfectly valid attitude, thank you very much. :P

    10. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      I have at least four concussions (one of them quite severe) to my name but no brain cancer - perhaps there is a connection? I'm just joshing, but that does make me wonder if there is a correlation (and causation) between head injuries and brain cancer...

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    11. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      Oh crap...it would appear that my statement is losing validity. Stop replying people! I shouldn't even be posting this message...

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    12. Re:The amount of replies to this story by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I think it is not that slashdotters dislike football players, otherwise they would be all here ranting, it is just that they probably do not find it all that interesting. It is all just a matter of taste and personal interests which can even change over time. My father is an academic dude, who topped his state in highschool, has two four year degrees, a research masters and is currently working on his PhD. When he was younger he could never stand watching any sport, however when he was forty or so, he realised that professional sport was the only thing he could watch who's ending was not made up by script writers and now it is all he watches.

      I have never played American or Canadian football, but rugby is very fun to play apart from the concussions. Last time I played it I was out for a few second, lost 5 minutes of memory and realised I couldn't do it anymore since I was risking far too much compared to what playing the game is worth to me. If you've been taken down by a rough tackle before, I think the risks should be pretty obvious to you, your brain does give some pretty heavy feedback to let you know it's sustained a blow. You just have to make a decision about what you value in your life, some will chose football, some won't. That said, plenty of Rhodes Scholarships have been given to amateur rugby players, so it isn't universally crippling.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    13. Re:The amount of replies to this story by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You might want to check my other post out. A relatively typical open field tackle involves 2 180+ players each travelling at 16+ mph. And is a really nasty hit, the protective gear doesn't really do a whole lot to elleviate that kind of energy. Which by the way is typical for high school ball, college and pro ball are probably both worse as the players are both bigger and faster.

      I played a bit of DB and tight end and there's a lot more thought to it than the /. nerds really want to acknowledge. DBs in particular have to be really good in watching subtle body language and keeping up with the receivers. Probably 90% of football is cerebral in some fashion. I was both the smallest and the slowest player on my team, but I got the physics and was able to hit harder than guys bigger than me because I wasn't particularly afraid of getting hit. I was also able to get under the bigger guys and consequently able to hold back guys weighing nearly a hundred pounds more than myself.

      It really depends upon the school, but the guys I played with were good guys. I don't recall a single bully amongst them.

    14. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A very good portion of us, who have dedicated our lives to actually accomplishing things that advance human society, prefer not to worship idiots who run around on a field and consume resources.

      It should also be noted that many of us have not, nor will we ever, forget who the enemy is. There is nothing wrong with maintaining the "same attitude [we] had in high school." A recent study noted that personalities are mostly fixed from age 6-7 onward. You were the enemy then, you are still the enemy now.

      And in case my point is not clear: If you are or ever were a jock, go fuck yourself.

    15. Re:The amount of replies to this story by fermion · · Score: 1
      High school football has some redeeming qualities, and it is only in the backwater rural and suburban parts of Texas where they actively weed out players.

      It is exposing younger players to the injuries of this and other sports that is going to be a problem for an already strained healthcare system and limit the opportunities for gainful employment due to physical and mental disabilities. I have seen parents as young as 10 in situations where they can be injured. Though young children are plastic, injuries do occur. It is reported that ACL injuries, for example, cannot effectively be treated in adolescents. Brain injuries, of course, are not treatable at any age. Concussions,the subject of the present report, simply have more time to accumulate.

      The sad thing is that many skills that some say can only be achieved through hgih impact sports can often be achieved with superior results in other ways. Fine motor control, of course, is legos. Hand eye coordination can be achieved by disassembly and things such as soldering. I can assemble mechanical system without even looking at them, just by touch. Lower impact sports, like running, casual futbol, and tennis or even simple hoops provides superior fitness without as much risk to injury. And of course, increasingly school are only giving partial scholarships for sports while full scholarships are still available to students with useful skills.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:The amount of replies to this story by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Ah a Chargers fan. Being a 49ers fan myself, I always like to meet Chargers fans. And watch them squirm in pain and agony as they remember the excitement of the final score: 49-26. When the 49ers were so far ahead the put defensive players on the offense just for fun. Oh, you do remember that don't you?

      Actually that's not true, I don't like football at all, except when I meet people from San Diego. Then somehow it becomes fun.

      --
      Qxe4
    17. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Yep, I enjoyed living in L.A. when the Lakers had Kobe, Shaq, Gary, and Karl. I'm such a filthy whore.

      But then I went back to my nerd roots and stuck up for the underdog. And where are the 69'ers and the Oakland AIDS'ers now?

    18. Re:The amount of replies to this story by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny thing is, at least in places (not Texas) that don't take high school football too seriously, football is an excellent opportunity for a nerd to get into the "in" crowd.

      In fact, it's how I became "cool." It didn't matter how well you played or how annoying or ugly you were, as long as you survived hell week and stuck with the team, you were in with the cool people(and, by extension, the juniors and seniors and the parties that they threw and all the pussy surrounding that whole scene).

      No, actually, the funny thing is how in the USA (maybe also Canada?) you so ridiculously obsess about being popular, being with the "in" people. Is being yourself so scary, over there?

      While I believe that there is some peer pressure to conform, everywhere, in the USA it seems it has become grotesque.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    19. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Not really. The misfit point of view is often refreshing to the proles. They often embrace the misfits, living vicariously through the misfits, while being too afraid themselves to express dissent with the pack. It works out wonderfully for the misfit. It's a symbiotic relationship which ensures maximum fun all around.

      When most high-school freshmen are so preoccupied with losing their virginity with only the hottest cheerleader stereotype, but never get there, it's often refreshing for them to hear from the few who've already been there...even if it was with fat chicks.

    20. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "in" crowd was exactly why I quit football after my first year of it. I loved playing the game, and the exercise, but I couldn't stand those assholes. I went to a great college with an infamously bad football team, and thought about trying out for it, but I met some of the football players while hanging out and they were only slightly less awful than the high school players I knew (mostly in that they lost the racist aspect).

    21. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because the social system is based on importance in america (this is from an aussie's perspective), you can be ignored or rendered invalid/uncool if you're not important enough in society, thus being 'in' the right crowd is, well, important. You won't even be heard if you're not important enough and you're expected to listen to some random fucker waffle on about his own life and listen to his poor jokes, because he is more important than you. And I think listening to other people talk all the time really wears you down, people need to be heard and noticed, even if it's a little bit. So americans become very driven to be important, because hey otherwise you're almost literally nobody.

      In aus we treat everybody equally, even ferociously so, cutting down people who approach the group with the belief they are better than the group but everybody gets equal airtime.

      I found it really quite humorous talking to some american ex-pats (20-25yr olds) in chinese restaurant, there was a clear hierarchy of who listened to who and the most important guy could get away with some outrageously stupid and/or rude replies because he was more important (and louder!?) than the others. But what was most humorous was that people fell in love with me just because I listened to them and actually tried to remember what they said, apparently this was a big deal and my american friend that was showing me around china said I'd do very well in america, because I listened... which is second nature to me, having grown up the son of english parents in aus.

      I really think there's an absolutely massive amount of stupidity seeping out of america on a daily basis because everybody loves to have their opinion heard, no matter the accuracy, it makes them feel important. So they take any opportunity to bellow it from the rooftops, whereas people in other cultures would not like to be seen as stupid, more than they would like people to hear their half-brained idea.

      But yeah this makes it seem like I hate america, on the contrary, I'd like to see america grow and there is plenty of positives to the importance based society, but yeah some negatives too.

    22. Re:The amount of replies to this story by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't mind football players. It's the actual game that I have no interest in whatsoever.

      The players themselves can be quite hot, actually :-)

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    23. Re:The amount of replies to this story by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      No, actually, the funny thing is how in the USA (maybe also Canada?) you so ridiculously obsess about being popular, being with the "in" people. Is being yourself so scary, over there?

      When you're 13? Well, yes.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    24. Re:The amount of replies to this story by elmodog · · Score: 1

      My orthodontist played football in HS and college. He always advised kids not to play it: knee damage, concussions, damage to teeth and jaw - mouth guards only give you so much protection

      You would think an orthodontist would encourage kids to play football. ;)

    25. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts, exactly, as an European.

      That, and the fact that they call football to "American national football" when all around the world football is another thing too.

    26. Re:The amount of replies to this story by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The number of replies to this story seems to indicate that perhaps a vast majority of slashdotters don't particularly like football players. I was actually hoping for some technical insight and whatnot, but it would seem everybody is still maintaining the same attitude they had in high school.

      I don't see any reason to believe that the football players have changed substantially since school, when they thought they were better than everyone else because they were athletes. Indeed, when a strategy works for someone, they generally continue to employ it. If the vast majority of football players (with some notable exceptions like Flutie... but he had personal tragedy to deal with) aren't assholes I am very, very surprised. Having had to deal with the jock mentality much more than I would ever have liked, I find it totally unsurprising that people don't like footballers. Me neither. It's a stupid sport in a whole variety of ways, not least that you take a perfectly good wargame and then restrict it with all kinds of lame rules. The concussions are just gravy. Arrogant and stupid FTW!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:The amount of replies to this story by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While I believe that there is some peer pressure to conform, everywhere, in the USA it seems it has become grotesque.

      I don't disagree that it is harmful, but to point out the USA as grotesque is a pathetic joke given other nations in the world. In some you will be punished if you do not wear the "correct" clothing. In some you will be killed if you have sex with the wrong people.

      The USA might encourage sameness, but we still permit an unparalleled degree of personal freedom. Can't say how long that will last, of course.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 of mine was severe.

      There is research along that front though.

    29. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Aussie who has played 'Rugby Union', 'Rugby League', 'American Football', Aussie Rules' and real football (Soccer) I will concur with your story that American Footballers hit the hard (in fact, I'd say they hit the hardest). Union is a lot tougher game (due to the lack of padding and the stomping on heads and biting and eye gouging etc), but American footballers hit harder in tackles.

      I've had concussions, broken ribs and they wanted to amputate my foot at one stage. (Not to mention my knees have problems).

      This doesn't mean the other football codes don't get injuries, but the general perception from people who haven't played American Football who think the padding stops people getting hurt is just altogether wrong. It really stops people getting killed from head clashes, chest hits (that'd break your ribs and probably push them into your lungs/heart) and other things.

      The best thing about American football is the tactics/mentality etc. It isn't just physical, it is also intellectual. Like you said, there is the reading of body language (which is why one year the coaches who were mainly over 40 beat the under 21 side, in spite of the under 21s being faster, fitter and stronger etc. When one of the under 21s asked how the old guys seemed to be able to cover them, one of the coaches replied, 'Because we knew where you were going to be before you got there.')

      Watching and playing American football actually made watching and understanding football (soccer) easier for me. This is because on an American football field all 22 players have a job to do. (A player to cover, a place to get to, a person to hit ... etc). Football (soccer) doesn't always involve everyone. (Some games a goalie may never even see the ball).

    30. Re:The amount of replies to this story by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      were... Sorry for the spelling error... It was the tumor typing ;)

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    31. Re:The amount of replies to this story by tim_darklighter · · Score: 1
      Shamelessly taken from Penn and Teller's Bullshit video-game violence episode:

      Penn: Next time you feel like worrying about fake violent video games, try a little Gedanken experiment: imagine that video games were invented 100 years before football. Picture school video game teams and uniforms and hot-ass cheerleaders with big, bouncing pom-poms. Now imagine after 100 years of extracurricular video game fun, football is invented and introduced to schools. Thousands of kids get real, no kidding, no fantasy, no make-believe broken knees, legs, ankles, cervical trauma, heatstroke, and concussions! [Throughout Penn's injury list, the crowd quiets, eventually becoming totally silent.] ...What would parents do? From 1931 to 2007, 665 kids died... from injuries they suffered playing football. This is not video game violence - this is real violence done to real children by other real children, all encouraged by schools and society. Every parent worries about his or her kids; every adult worries about all children, but you need to pick what you think is worth worrying about.

      I'm not necessarily picking on high-school football, but to do this for 20-some odd years seems like purposely shortening your life. To para-phrase Penn, decide on your priorities. I'll stick to running, cycling, and weightlifting for my health benefits.

    32. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, someone got made fun of in school and is still bitter about it...

    33. Re:The amount of replies to this story by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about being popular, it's about being completely ousted.

      Once you are blackballed in elementary school it can take more than a decade to undo the damage.

      Or you can be like many nerds (myself included) who after years of inflicted upon social isolation you just don't give a damn anymore and fit in just about anywhere.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    34. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dad has one, too. He seems to be doing fairly well right now. Best of luck to you.

    35. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football players are knuckle draggers. If they find a college that will lower the bar low enough to take them, they go into marketing/sales. If not, they become car salesmen. Sometimes the military can rehabilitate them into something useful. The rest of their lives are spent as arm chair quarterbacks recalling high school glory days. There are a few exceptions to every generalization of course.

    36. Re:The amount of replies to this story by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about being popular, it's about being completely ousted.

      Once you are blackballed in elementary school it can take more than a decade to undo the damage.

      Or you can be like many nerds (myself included) who after years of inflicted upon social isolation you just don't give a damn anymore and fit in just about anywhere.

      Pretty bleak. I am happy my son won't grow up in such an environment.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    37. Re:The amount of replies to this story by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Or you can be like many nerds (myself included) who after years of inflicted upon social isolation you just don't give a damn anymore and fit in just about anywhere."

      Good point, which I note other replies failed to understand: It only hurts to be uncool if you care about being cool. As soon as you stop caring about being cool, you're cool anywhere, with anyone, in any situation, because it's no longer about how OTHERS see you.

      "He was a leader because he did not look back to see who was following him."
          -- from Mr.Roberts

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. Handegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    An effeminate version of rugby.

  16. Read about it in GQ by djlemma · · Score: 2, Informative

    The October 2009 issue of GQ had a major article about this. Click to read it here.

    I found the article actually pretty fascinating, but it is a bit of a narrative about this particular doctor's quest to bring his research into the public eye.

    Also, who knew GQ had such a fantastic catalog of their back-issues? I think I might have to read their stuff more often. I know it's very un-slashdot of me, but whatever.

  17. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I take it that you have inspected the reproductive organs on many professional athletes using steroids and found them somewhat deficient?

  18. Who cares? by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    After all, they don't worry about what happens to geeks' muscles.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ' ... they don't worry about what happens to geeks' muscles.'

      Unless they accidentally glue their hand to it ... as in American Pie 2. Then everyone gets a laugh.

  19. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember seeing an article very recently (on Slashdot maybe) that pointed out that boxing got more dangerous when they started using padded gloves, because that let the boxers hit with all their strength. Take away the football helmets and pads and you might get more contusions and cuts, but less brain damage; it would be more like rugby with the players hitting each other much more softly.

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that's an accurate assessment about football vs. rugby that's brought up occasionally. Rugby players would kill themselves (literally) if they hit with equal force. But football players would be on the ground exhausted if they ran just half as much as their counterparts.

      Professional boxers greatly outmatch even most football players when it comes to sustaining insane amounts of head trauma. But somehow that discussion is culturally taboo or something.

    2. Re:hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's an accurate assessment about football vs. rugby that's brought up occasionally. Rugby players would kill themselves (literally) if they hit with equal force. But football players would be on the ground exhausted if they ran just half as much as their counterparts.

      True on both accounts.

      Professional boxers greatly outmatch even most football players when it comes to sustaining insane amounts of head trauma. But somehow that discussion is culturally taboo or something.

      I think it's pretty well-accepted that boxers are inevitably going to suffer long-term brain trauma from boxing, despite the ridiculously ineffective safeguards they use (referee stopping the fight if one fighter is dazed too long, months between matches, etc.)

    3. Re:hmm by Espressor · · Score: 1
      I read an article in a boxing magazine years ago that claimed that padded leather helmets are bad too: they somehow transform the shock wave from a hit in such a way that it actually damages the brain even more that with no helmet.

      The disturbing TFA makes me think I am rather happy not to kickbox anymore.

    4. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing an article very recently (on Slashdot maybe) that pointed out that boxing got more dangerous when they started using padded gloves, because that let the boxers hit with all their strength. Take away the football helmets and pads and you might get more contusions and cuts, but less brain damage; it would be more like rugby with the players hitting each other much more softly.

      That's a nice theory.

      It's also wrong.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15335432
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15335433

      Rates of skull and head injury have dropped with each succeeding generation of football helmet. Neck injuries briefly increased after the advent of the plastic helmet, but rule changes took care of most of that.

    5. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those two articles observe that increased regulation and improved helmet safety resulted in less injuries. You allude to players tackling more strongly when better equipment safely allowed them to. The OP posited that players without padding and helmets would consciously elect to tackle with less impact, reducing injuries of their own volition. None of these three observations conflict.

    6. Re:hmm by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative
      Take away the football helmets and pads and you might get more contusions and cuts, but less brain damage; it would be more like rugby with the players hitting each other much more softly

      College football had become so lethal around 1900 that the game came within an inch of being abandoned.

      The 1905 season...brought its rash of casualties. There were twenty-three football deaths. Only a handful took place in intercollegiate play, but one in particular set in motion the movement to reform the game. In a match between Union College and New York University, Harold Moore of Union died after being kicked in the head. Chancellor Henry M. MacCracken of NYU seized the opportunity to summon a reform conference.

      In the 1906 season and for two years following, the verdict on the "new football" was generally favorable. In spite of fluctuations in the injury count, the number of deaths dropped to fourteen, fifteen, and ten.

      Then, in the fall of 1909, the trend toward a safer game abruptly reversed itself. In a match between Harvard and West Point, the Army captain, Eugene Byrne, exhausted by continual plays to his side of the line, was fatally injured. Earl Wilson of the Naval Academy was paralyzed and later died as a result of a flying tackle. And the University of Virginia's halfback Archer Christian died after a game against Georgetown, probably from a cerebral hemorrhage suffered in a plunge through the line. . "Does the public need any more proof," wrote the Washington Post, "that football is a brutal, savage, murderous sport? Is it necessary to kill many more promising young men before the game is revised or stopped altogether?" President David Starr Jordan of Stanford referred to football as "Rugby's American pervert..."

      Early headgear, seldom worn consistently, shielded the ears and surface of the head but gave inadequate protection to the skull and brain. After World War I a sponge-rubber lining was added to the crown of the helmet, and by the late 1930s a sturdy leather helmet with an inner felt lining was being used. But it was not until 1943 that all players were required to wear headgear. The plastic helmet, which distributes shock more evenly, was introduced in the 1940s amid objections reminiscent of those that accompanied the original solely leather helmets. Some critics argued--and still do--that the hard plastic helmet, used as an offensive weapon, has as much potential for causing as for preventing serious injuries. Inventing Modern Football

    7. Re:hmm by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You've got a point, football helmets do a terrible job of protecting the brain. I'm not sure what the numbers are, but there hard and I doubt that they absorb much of the impact. There meant to go helmet to shoulder pads or really helmet to anything other than helmet, as otherwise there isn't enough cushion to absorb the energy involved. Which to be honest is considerable during special teams.

    8. Re:hmm by bazorg · · Score: 1

      I heard something similar on QI (http://www.qi.com/tv/). They said that before gloves were introduced, most punches were to the body, not to the head. As soon as people started punching heads, fatalities increased.

    9. Re:hmm by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      This is the same rebuttal MMA advocates use when people comment on the brutality of their sport, and its very valid. Blackouts aren't caused by the force of the punch, but the force applied per second. Boxing gloves spread this force out (like the crumple zone in a car), making them more damaging in the long-term than single-punch knockouts that you see in MMA.

  20. What happens to a football watcher's neurons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, between the blatant flamboyant homosexuality, the 6 seconds of running with 10 minutes of talking, the constant stopping and commercials, what happens to my neurons when watching this boring, hoakey pseudo-sport?

    1. Re:What happens to a football watcher's neurons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, at least it isn't Nascar.

  21. The real damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [troll]
    The vast majority of the damage caused by sports is actually found in the brains of those who mindlessly consume Natty Light (etc.) while sitting around the 80" television they bought at the local Rent N Pay.
    [/troll]

    1. Re:The real damage by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Natty light? It that the UK equivalent of the US Milwaukee's best or Keystone who advertised no bitter beer = no hops = no taste?
      All I need is a gristle, oat and fat banger and a pint of fizzy piss colored alcohol water, that and a 60" tube,
      and I'm ready to sleep all Sat afternoon..
      Could this cause brain damage?

    2. Re:The real damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natty light? It that the UK equivalent of the US Milwaukee's best or Keystone who advertised no bitter beer = no hops = no taste?

      Given that I live in the UK and have never heard of "Natty Light", and given that WP claims that it's America's fifth-largest selling beer, I'd say it's pretty obviously a Yank thing.

  22. whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't rtfa or even tfs, but I've got your answer right here: Whatever.

  23. Deception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was expecting a study along these lines "Violent sports make you dumber."
    I was not very disappointed.

    1. Re:Deception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how much dumber? It's undeniable that football largely does inflict significant head injury. But I'd say that NBA players are overwhelmingly more dumb than most NFL players, and basketball isn't violent. I think the stupidity we often see in professional sports isn't caused foremost by brain damage, but by a lack of education. At the other end of the scale, heavyweight boxing (as mentioned above) actually can turn a reasonably smart man into a drooling mess.

  24. So.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    So, this explains the US Cxx class and all their wonderful and logical decisions.

  25. What happens to a football player's neurons??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this assume that they had neurons to begin with?

  26. Coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What were the odds that a guy called Lou Gehrig would contract Lou Gehrig's Disease? The irony!

  27. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by telchine · · Score: 1

    You refer to "athletes". I suspect you made the same mistake as me. This "news" story does not refer to footballers, it actually refers to those that partake in "American Football", please do not confuse them with athletes that play real football!

    David Beckham never had any significant amount of neurons to damage in the first place!

  28. It makes the fans uncomfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The New Yorker had an excellent article about this recently: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/19/091019fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all

    Don't be so quick to credit the lack of comments to American Football's popularity on slashdot - though the topic of professional sports is not usually the most popular topic amongst a group of self described "nerds".

    I credit the lack of comments to the fact that the horrible permanent injuries, physical and mental, accrued by the people playing the game (aka the "heroes" or the "stars", as they are usually referred to in popular American culture) makes them, in fact, victims. Admittedly it is hard to call a person who has earned millions of dollars a "victim", but they are - just as much as someone who receives millions of dollars as the result of a crippling car accident. And many (read: most) of them don't earn nearly that much money, but still accumulate lifetime injuries over a relatively short career.

    These players almost never understand the long term repercussions of the sport. Of course even if they did, many would play in spite of the dangers, just as people smoke cigarettes despite decades of evidence indicating the damage caused to the body...but the dangers should at least be publicly acknowledged.

  29. Boxing is not a real sport by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The objective in boxing is to cause sufficient brain trauma to your opponent that he loses consciousness or can no longer stand up. That's not a sport, that's barbarism, and has no business in a civilized society. the short term, it's highly dangerous, and in the long term it can turn you into what's left of Muhammad Ali.

    By contrast, wrestling is a real sport, in spite of the fact that professional boxing is for real and professional wrestling is as much fake showmanship as sport. (And yes, just because it's fake doesn't mean than any of those guys can't throw my ass out of the ring, and look good doing it.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Meh, Sumo is more entertaining. Now there's a sport. It's all about balance and technique.
      You don't need to be extremely heavy either just look at some of the lighter ones like Kotooshu

    2. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And fat guys in diapers.

    3. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Watching reruns of Ali doing the 'rope-a-dope' against George Foreman is watching irreversible horrible trauma as it was inflicted.

      Saying boxing is not a sport just because you think it is barbaric is ridiculous, though. It is attractive to people because it is a blood sport. You're just misusing language in an attempt to make your point. I happen to agree that boxing has no place in a civilized society, but I'd rather see straightforward and honest arguments used to facilitate its demise.

    4. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      In America, at least, boxing has almost fallen off the cultural radar (I blame the rise of pay-per-view) and been replaced by mixed martial arts. The question is, is that any better?

    5. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      That's not a sport, that's barbarism, and has no business in a civilized society.

      Nonsense. We're talking 2 consenting adults here. Noone's holding a gun to their heads forcing them to box.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    6. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Would you maybe entertain the thought that because we are in a civilized society we have regulated blood sports like boxing or MMA? In an uncivilized society we got our base desires for violence off by going around killing other peoples/villages/etc and going on wars and crusades? Wouldn't you say that millions of people sitting around watching 2 guys duke it out so you don't have to civilized in some sense? By civilizing fighting.

      --
      Balderdash!
    7. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      +1, consenting adults can go fight each other with sledgehammers for all I care. I think society would be less "civilized" if an(other) activity that only poses a threat to willing participants wasn't allowed.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I find Sumo interesting to watch for the same reason -- it's a subtle contest rather akin to baseball, that "game of inches". A quarter of a degree shift of balance translates into an advantage, and so on. I gather that just bulldozing your opponent out of the ring is considered poor technique.

      Mind you I also love American Football, but for itself. Every sport doesn't need to have the same virtues!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Boxing is not a real sport by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'd say that's a good point -- civilization starts to FAIL, and to become totalitarianism, at the point where it says "You can't DO that to each other" when whatever activity involves only mutually-consenting adults, with no DIRECT harm to others. (If you start calculating *indirect* harm, it never ends until everyone is locked in a safety-box.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  30. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by DWMorse · · Score: 1

    Say what you like about the intelligence of (or money made by) American Football players, nobody makes videos like THIS about our guys =P

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
  31. second concussion by sjames · · Score: 1

    The description of axons returning to normal appearance but being in a fragile state internally could explain second concussion syndrome.

    I know in baseball there is generally a growing recognition that a concussion calls for mandatory rest afterward. Research to determine how much rest is needed would be very useful, right now they have to guess and hope it's enough. A good diagnostic tool might be even better.

  32. No we're talking about Football... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The term football for hundreds of years has been used to refer to many games that were "played on foot" as opposed to on horseback or some other means. "American Football" definitely gets a claim on that. Every bit as much as soccer (properly known as "Association Football").

    Read, learn... (if you can)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football

  33. For reference... by toadlife · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  34. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a GIS for "steroids shrunken deformed testes scrotums" and found nothing.
    Can we assume this is first hand knowledge? First or second person?

  35. that explains a lot by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    It's no wonder Brett Favre can't decide whether he wants to retire or not!

    1. Re:that explains a lot by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      No, he just can'd publicly admit that he actually wants to die on the field.

      --
      Balderdash!
  36. Do they have any? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    Neurons, I mean?

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  37. , It's handegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  38. We love football, but don't get American football by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Oh lots of us love football, it's just we don't get American Football. We prefer the version where players use their feet to kick the ball.

    Many of us think American Football might be rugby but with more padding because Americans are scared of getting hurt. Or perhaps they are more sensible and like their teeth and unbroken bones or other such faint excuses.

  39. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Official_portrait_of_Barack_Obama.jpg

    I can't say for sure, but I think this is a picture of Barry Bonds' nut sack.

  40. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he also had to compare with at least a sample of 100 non-athletes

  41. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    Well this being an American site, it makes sense to call it just football since that's what it's called here.

  42. I am former football player w/motor neuron disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am a former lineman/college football player with a motor neuron disease, and long time nerd and slashdot reader. (That is surely a rare and perhaps unique combination one would think).

    I find this study and the response quite interesting as you can imagine.

    The phenotype of my disease tracks Calpain deficient limb girdle muscular dystrophy and to a lesser extent polymyositis. Yet doctors (including several at NIH) have never been able to make a definitive diagnosis. For example, repeated biopsies did not show dystrophic changes in the muscle and new genetic tests for Calpain deficiency were negative. This does not rule out that I have either or both diseases but the new study is very interesting given my football history.

    I have been trying to figure out from the article and a Real Sports story whether all of the known players had a phenotype consistent with ALS (eg death in 2-4 years). I don't really track with ALS, not the least of which because I have had serious disease for more than a decade and I should live a good while longer at the current pace -- hopefully decades. One wonders if everyone they found has ALS like symptoms if that points to my motor neuron disease being coincidental with football or whether the study focussed too narrowly on only one type of motor neuron disease.

    Another interesting aspect is that there are hints on Real Sports and the articles I've seen that some friends and teammates might have had the newly described disorder. For example, two close-friend boxers were discussed on Real Sports.

    Given that the newly described disorder is still incredibly rare (only 16 times or so more prevalent than ALS), having friends or teammates get the disease seems highly unusual -- perhaps indicative or some viral or other modality coupled with the head trauma -- though of course you can always have two lottery winners living next door.

    In this regard, one of my football coaches with whom I spent four years working died in his 40s of "ALS" and his symptoms began about 3 years after mine.

    Cheers.

  43. Zimmer didn't do his homework by DentateGyrus · · Score: 1

    Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) isn't as mysterious as Zimmer implies. It's actually kind of cool from a physics standpoint. The shearing occurs at the interfaces between different types of brain tissues due to the different densities of the tissues. Also, the theory of long term neurotrauma presenting as ALS is pretty thin.
    -TBI researcher

  44. Re:Don't forget about their scrotums. by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1