Slashdot Mirror


Germany To Roll Out ID Cards With Embedded RFID

An anonymous reader writes "The production of RFID chips, an integral element of the new generation of German identity cards, has started after the government gave a 10-year contract to the chipmaker NXP in the Netherlands. Citizens will receive the mandatory new ID cards starting from the first of November. The new card allows German authorities to identify people with speed and accuracy, the government said. These authorities include the police, customs and tax authorities and of course the local registration and passport granting authorities. There are some concerns that the use of RFID chips will pose a security or privacy risk, however. Early versions of the electronic passports, using RFID chips with a protocol called 'basic access control' (BAC), were successfully hacked by university researchers and security experts."

62 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. EU passports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    New EU passports have RFID already. This is just a replacement for the barcode, right? The ID shouldn't have any information on it. If the implementers were smart ...

    1. Re:EU passports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the contrary. Since the new EU passports contain fingerprint data and a digital version of the picture, much of the contention about the new passports revolved around the creation of a central database of biometric information. If the passports were just an index into the database, then that database would be inevitable.

      It is important that technology-minded users learn not to apply the usual centralist approach to everything. We are not cattle.

    2. Re:EU passports by udippel · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first three posts in this discussion are - as of now - ACs. Though different from the normal 'First Piss Post'-category. They are spot on the topic. Still ACs. Why?
      Already fearful of being tracked? Yes, you are. Through your IP-addresses.
      Next year you can be tracked by having your Personalausweis in your pocket. Or in your bag. You need it, because you want to enter an official building; the Rathaus.
      Or doing banking business:
      "Guten Morgen, Frau Müller."
      "Uh, Sie kennen mich?"
      "Nein, aber Sie haben Ihren Ausweis dabei! Ich denke Sie wollen Ihren Urlaub bezahlen!?"
      "Woher wissen Sie das?"
      "Nun, als Sie hier hereinkamen, hat unsere Sicherheitssoftware gemeldet, dass Sie gerade auch im Reisebüro waren."

      Oh, what a brave new world we weave ... .

  2. identity cards, not passports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The passports already have RFID. This is about the identity cards. (which is only a card, compared to the passports that are too big to carry them around with you all the time).

    1. Re:identity cards, not passports by Khyber · · Score: 2, Informative

      The full-sized US passport fits in my back pocket without any problem, my wallet sits comfortably in front of it.

      Too big, what? It's just over 3"x5" in size.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:identity cards, not passports by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but you have to remember that Americans have a lot fatter asses than they have in Europe.

      I wouldn't be so quick to jump on that bandwagon. Although this is an older site, I can't imagine things have changed drastically in 5 years. The page was also updated in Dec of 2009:

      http://www.malehealth.co.uk/weight/18962-now-were-fatter-americans

      Two out of three US men — 67% - are overweight or obese. Finland, Germany, Greece, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Malta have now all exceeded this figure. England and Wales are not far behind.

      The EU is so worried about it that it has launched its own campaign against obesity. 'The time when obesity was thought to be a problem on the other side of the Atlantic has gone by,' said Mars Di Bartolomeo, Luxembourg's Minister of Health.

      The tubby top ten:

      Greece (78.6% of blokes are overweight or obese)
      Germany (75.4%)
      Czech Republic (73.2%)
      Cyprus (72.6%)
      Slovakia (69%)
      Malta (68%)
      Finland (67.8%)
      Slovenia (66.5%)
      Ireland (66.4%)
      England and Wales (65.4%).

      Frankly, I don't think urban sprawl has anything to do with obesity in a significant way. I think it has to do with fat/calorie content of restaurant food (especially so in the US), and the fact that 'eating out', which used to be the odd occurrence here, has become more the norm for a high percentage of homes. Way too much fast food, or even regular restaurants that don't have healthy menu's. We also spend far more time isolated in our homes, on the internet, and watching TV.

      On a side note, I eat out a couple of times a week but I adapt my intake to compensate for shitty food that I might eat on occasion. I also spend 6-10 hours a week in the gym doing heavy lifting and I bicycle for 8-16 miles on the weekends. I live in the the deep south where obesity is even higher than the 'norm' for the U.S.

      I sometimes feel like a stranger in my own land given the looks I get in public at times.

    3. Re:identity cards, not passports by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2, Funny

      But what kind of idiot keeps his wallet in back pocket?

      George Costanza

  3. perfect bomb triggers by vinsci · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The new card allows German authorities to identify people with speed and accuracy, the government said.

    Unfortunately, they will also make perfect bomb triggers, when the target walks by.

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    1. Re:perfect bomb triggers by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Informative

      That said, if you use public transport, there is basically no way around taking it along with you.

      Really? I've never been asked to show my identity card. What you may required to show in certain situations (as in, when caught using the transport without a valid ticket, or in case of using a price-reduced personalized ticked), is an official paper with image ("amtlicher Lichtbildausweis"), but that doesn't have to be your identity card, your driving license should work anyway (I don't have experience with this, though, because I've never been asked to show it in public transport anyway, not even with personalized train tickets).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:perfect bomb triggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Won't happen.

      The chip is based on the ISO14443-A standard and you can only communicate with it over at most 15 cm distance (about 6 inch). Under normal conditions the range goes down to roughly one inch. You have to walk very close to the bomb to set it off.

      A bomb will also have a hard time to identify you. The chip has an ID that is public readable, but for privacy reasons this ID is a random number that is only valid for a single transaction session.

      Also the article is wrong. The pass will not use the BAC protocol but the much improved PACE protocol. That's state of the art crypto. It's still broken by design because you can do a simple man in the middle attack over the air, but it is a lot better..

    3. Re:perfect bomb triggers by ewanm89 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is 96ft (~29m) far enough away, that's the Defcon record. Blackhat USA 2010 has beat it don't know the practical distance achieved but the paper gives a theoretical maximum of 565ft (~172m). Want to change some of those assumptions? It's a radio, distance is based on three things transmitter power, receiver sensitivity and atmospheric conditions the first 2 can be controlled very easily.

    4. Re:perfect bomb triggers by vlm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a near field communication chip, which isn't easily readable from more than a few centimeters away.

      Maybe you were trying to be reassuring, but what that actually means is the device absolutely won't trigger until the victim sits at the bus stop, or restaurant seat or whatever. If the IED goes off 500 feet down the road, no problemo unless its a suitcase nuke, but if it doesn't go off until you sit on the park bench, then you're pretty much screwed.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:perfect bomb triggers by vlm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A bomb will also have a hard time to identify you.

      Disagree. No response means no one is there and/or they're not German. Any response means there is a German, now do something (probably bad). You're arguing you don't know the state of Schrodingers cat. I'm arguing that knowing Schrodingers cat is present, is in itself a valuable datapoint.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:perfect bomb triggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They just spoofed, they haven't talked to the TAG at all!

      ISO14443-A and other NFC tags simply don't work like this:

      You need a two way communication. From the reader to the tag, and from the tag to the reader. The ISO14443-A tag is not capable to actively send out answers. Instead it loads down the magnetic field that powers it. This load is measured on the side of the reader and interpreted as answers from the tag.

      If I remember right the tag must be able to pull about 10% of energy out of the magnetic field to transmit data.

      And this puts a simply physical constraint on the range:

      You can't simply make the reader put out a stronger magnetic field. This would increase the range from the reader to the tag, but it would also make it almost impossible for the tag to answer because it can't remove that much energy anymore. If you lower the energy of the field the tag doesn't has enough power to operate.

      The 15 cm

      In the lab you can get a longer distance than 15 cm... Maybe up to half a meter or so. To do so you have to calibrate the resonant frequency of the tag and the reader so that they are almost perfectly coupled. And you have to do this in an RF shielded room because every disturbance in the RF field would interfere the transfer.

      What the Defcon guys did was to listen to a running communication between a reader and a tag from afar. That is indeed possible up to such a range.. That will not tell you anything interesting except the fact that a tag was read because the first thing the pass does is to do a Diffie-Hellmann key exchange (part of the PACE protocol). Oh - you get the ID from the tag, but as I wrote earlier the ID is random ...

      Not much gained..

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman_key_exchange

    7. Re:perfect bomb triggers by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Unfortunately, they will also make perfect bomb triggers, when the target walks by."

      Plinking Alfred Herrhausen (to use a German example) was quite the coup. RFID-triggered ordnance could be smaller and even more precise.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. time to buy by zerothink · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's time to buy RFID-blocking cover/wallet/bag/whatever. Or feel free to have some fun with aluminum foil - http://www.rpi-polymath.com/ducttape/RFIDWallet.php

    1. Re:time to buy by MikeyVB · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the curious, it takes approximately 4 layers of aluminum foil to block a scanner from activating the RFID signal when your Al lined wallet is point blank from a standard scanner.

      (After receiving an RFID enabled ID card here in the Netherlands last year, I tested it on our office copy/scanner RFID reader, and then simply lined my wallet with double the number of layers it took to block the signal. Works like a charm!)

    2. Re:time to buy by drewhk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All of my IDs and cards fit nicely in a metallic business card case. It's cheap, small, looks nice and blocks radio.

    3. Re:time to buy by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I'd just microwave mine till it stopped working. Make the bastards have to type it in every time someone asked to see it and claim I had no idea why their shitty card never worked,

  5. The ID cards are technically not mandatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Germans must be able to identify themselves with either a passport or an ID card. There is no obligation to have either of those with you at any time.

    The new cards do not use classic RFID chips but near field communication, which is much harder to attack from a distance (if at all).

    Anyone who wants to sit this out can get a new ID card before November. The old ID cards cost 8 EUR and are valid for 10 years.

    1. Re:The ID cards are technically not mandatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Ausweispflicht" means you have to have a passport or an ID card (You can have both, but you don't have to). You do not have to have either of them on you. Pissed off authorities are a fact of life, but they're not the law (yet). Public transport often requires a picture ID to be presented with a month pass. That is a contract thing and not related to the "Ausweispflicht".

    2. Re:The ID cards are technically not mandatory by think_nix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah I guess you are right:

      http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausweispflicht

      Only if they ask for it , interesting , but still..

    3. Re:The ID cards are technically not mandatory by think_nix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah I guess you are right:

      http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausweispflicht

      Only if they ask for it , interesting , but still..

      Shit I meant this one (damn copy buffer) : http://bundesrecht.juris.de/persauswg/__1.html

    4. Re:The ID cards are technically not mandatory by mwissel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The authorities do not take it lightly if you "forgot" your ID either, depending on the situation.

      Wrong, there is no actual problem with forgetting your ID, as there is no obligation to carry one with you - exception is the driving license when operating a vehicle. Actually the police may demand you to fetch your ID at home or whereever it may be, and they might demand to bring you there themselves when they think you might flee. But I think that only happens when you're in suspicion for something.

  6. Targetted advertising is more likely by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Walk past an e-paper advert board. It scans your ID, looks up your preferences and buying history and throws up a 20 foot high shot of a naked guy and directions to the local rubber fetish store.
     

    --
    Deleted
  7. Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've always wanted to be a german.

    And now i can be a bunch of them!

    1. Re:Awesome... by think_nix · · Score: 4, Informative

      True to that check this out:

      http://www.personalausweisportal.de/cln_164/DE/Neue-Moeglichkeiten/Online-Ausweisfunktion/online-ausweisfunktion_node.html

      The new online functions! If you dont understand german try google translate, here a quick translation

      Identification on the Internet and on machines can in the future be done with the new identity card. This is simple and safe as the presentation of your previous card today.
      Even without being personally present you can use the online identity function (also: eID function) authenticate everywhere (where personalized services - are consequently offered and directly tailored to the individual user). With your new personal ID and your 6-digit PIN you can prove your identity in the electronic world simple, safe and reliable.

      That is just the first paragraph , better than the Sunday comics !

    2. Re:Awesome... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what's the big deal? The Netherlands has had a digital ID card for doing business with the government for years already. Now perhaps you enjoy standing in a line somewhere, but I prefer handling my business from the comfort of my chair, at any time of the day that is convenient for me and at a total lower cost to the taxpayer.

      Now I don't quite see the point of RFID either, but being able to handle one's affairs over a distance sounds...convenient.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  8. Ihre RFID Bitte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Danke !!

    Ihre R F I D Bitte

    D anke !!

    Aolso, Ihre RFID Bitte

    Dank e !!

    Ihre RFID Bitte

    Danke !!

    Ihre RFID Bitte

    Danke !!

    Ihre RFID Bitte

    HALT !!

  9. Barcodes don't radiate information by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just a replacement for the barcode, right?

    Even if it were, it would be dangerous. Giving someone remote access to your passport/ID card number is a security risk by itself.

    They already have your face, anyone can take a picture of your face without you knowing it. If they can create a fake document matching that face to the right document number that's a big step towards stealing your identity.

    1. Re:Barcodes don't radiate information by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. You could have a card with RFID which embeds a key that unlocks data in the database. Since governments have control over the database one wouldn't have to worry much their data being looked at by unauthorised staff and if the database was ever stolen only your physical card could unlock it.

      Also there are benefits to having an ID card rather then a passport. One being you never run out of space for stamps and then have to spend lots of money on extending the pages or a new passport.

      ID theft is probably the biggest issue but that could be overcome by a combination of embedded key, thumb print and personal password; or in other words, something you have, something you are and something you know.

    2. Re:Barcodes don't radiate information by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could have a card with RFID which embeds a key that unlocks data in the database. Since governments have control over the database one wouldn't have to worry much their data being looked at by unauthorised staff and if the database was ever stolen only your physical card could unlock it.

      You obviously have a very different government to mine. If it's in a government database in the UK, the odds are that copies of it will be posted to the wrong address on unencrypted DVD-Rs, left on hard drives on trains or in taxies, leaked to the press, or used by council employees for private purposes.

      A better solution is not to store the information in either place. Store it on the passport in encrypted form and store the encryption key in the central database (or vice versa). You then need to both do a database query and scan the passport to have access to the data. If someone gets a copy of the database, it's no use to them without the passports. If someone steals a passport, they can't access the information on it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. Re:Proprietary Protocol by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have that right. Letting people know how to use the chip would compromise security, you see. Don't believe the people who say the chip has already been broken. These weren't officially tasked to do so by the government, so their results don't count. Also, why are you asking questions about this in the first place? Do you want the boogeymen to win? This is for your own safety, man! How could you be against that?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  11. The US started it by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Informative

    After 9/11, the US mandated biometric passports for all (if you wanted to enter the US).

    Under legislation introduced after the September 11th attacks, the United States has tightened security measures for foreign tourists entering its country. The latest measure requires that by 2012, every traveler entering the United States who is part of the visa-waiver program must have a biometric passport or be forced to apply for a visa. ... ...
    Initially, Washington gave a 2006 deadline for the 27 countries in the EU and other visa-waiver countries such as Norway, Iceland and Switzerland, but then pushed the date back to June of this year to give these countries more time to prepare the technology needed to issue the biometric passports. The US State Department started introducing e-passports in 2006 and every passport holder in the US is projected to have one by 2017.

    1. Re:The US started it by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:The US started it by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but the law also states that a passport's RFID malfunctions, the passport is still legal. 10 seconds in the microwave is just about right.

  12. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you'd think history would have taught them to maximize personal liberties, not to diminish them in any way? Oh well, there is still zeit fur packen zee bagen.

    No, they look to the government for guidance still. It's in the character. They still don't have real freedom of speech there.

    OTOH, if you look at what set of circumstances us Americans revolted against the King Of England for and how it is today, all you see is more government and taxes than they ever accepted in every aspect of our lives. And people constantly clamoring for more as a solution to their problems.

  13. On the BAC thing... by Wdi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the standard required by US immigration for foreign biometric passports.

    And only with these you can take advantage of visa-waiver (minus ESTA, minus new tourism support fee) entry into the US.

    So either your passport supports this, or you can make an appointment weeks in advance at a select US consulate in a city only a few hundred kilometers away if you want to travel.

  14. A little bit of perspective... by k.a.f. · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The federal ID card is not "mandatory" in any sense except that you may have to show it for certain very fundamental occasions, notably voting. (May have to show, I should add - the last two federal elections I wasn't even asked for the ID card, just for my voter's notification.) You have to actively go out, apply for an ID card and pay the fee to get one. You can live a long and productive live and never use your ID at all, unless you're a lawyer by profession or get arrested a lot... Also, the new chip ID will be issued starting in September - it will be a long time until even a majority has one. I got an old-style ID in July, so I'm good until 2020, and even then I won't give my fingerprint for it, that's an optional feature (it's only required for international passports).

    So, overall - yeah, this is a deal, but it's a lot less big a deal than the summary makes it sound like.

    1. Re:A little bit of perspective... by agw · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to actively go out, apply for an ID card and pay the fee to get one. You can live a long and productive live and never use your ID at all, unless you're a lawyer by profession or get arrested a lot...

      Not quite. You will have to use it if you want to get a bank account (and I assuem you want one). If you're younger, you will have to use it to get a driver's license, probably to sign contracts, to get into music clubs late night, to get alcohol, even to play the lottery and of course everytime you fly within the EU.

      So I say you can live a long and productive live alone in the mountains and never use your ID at all.

  15. Re:Who woulda thunk it by Urkki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, and the government is out on tracking everybody! Really if they want to track you they will no matter what. If I have to choose between a RFID chip in my ID card or a tinfoil hat and wallet. I'll take the RFID chip cause the chance of it being useful exceeds the chance of the government bothering to track everything I do.

    No, the thing is, without this kind of technology, they can choose a number of individuals they have resources to track at the same time. With this type of technology, they can track everybody at the same time. With modern storage capacities, a future government can retroactively check what you have been doing through your life.

    And it becomes a slippery slope. It starts with tracking terrorist suspects, proceeds to solving other crimes, and ends with tracking people who disagree with the current party in power and threaten their next election win, and after that all bets are off. Just hope you never visited a house where some opposition activist lived back then...

  16. Outsourced to the Netherlands by shikaisi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I find the most intriguing part of this whole thing is the decision to outsource the chips to a Dutch company. I wonder how long it will be before all the RFIDs fail and send only a message saying "Give us our bikes back".

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  17. Re:Who woulda thunk it by agw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like we didn't have ID cards in Germany before. Everyone already has an ID card and a number.

  18. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, they look to the government for guidance still. It's in the character. They still don't have real freedom of speech there.

    So it is only "freedom" if it is identical to your version of freedom ?

    Please, cut down the arrogance a few notches, you'll notice the rest of the world likes you a lot better if you don't go around all the time assuming that your way is the one and only true path to whatever.

    Our freedom of speech (I'm german) is as real as yours. We just have some priorities differently. For example, we don't allow people to threaten abortion doctors with murder under the cover of "free speech". Our version of your "free speech" is called "freie Meinungsäußerung". That has three parts: Free, speech and opinion. What it means is you can freely express your opinion. If you leave the area of expressing your opinion - and "we'll kill you" isn't an opinion anymore - you may run into trouble.

    And no, we don't look for the government for guidance. In fact, our current government is such a joke, anyone who does look to them for anything except satire is retarded. However, what we do is not share the ridiculous paranoia about the government that is visible in the US. We don't think anything done by the government is automatically evil and to be mistrusted. We view the government as an entity much like many others - capable of both good and evil.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  19. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you'd think history would have taught them to maximize personal liberties, not to diminish them in any way?

    Second World War was generations ago. The lessons have been forgotten, so authoritarianism and militarism are once again on the rise in Europe, and will once again lead to the world burning. That will be followed by the survivors being horrified of what they have seen and done, and swearing "never again", but a few generations later things will deteriorate again. That is the cycle of human history, and it cannot be broken, since no matter what lessons you might learn, your children won't, and their children certainly won't care.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  20. Mythbusters - RFID by object404 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Adam Savage's talk on the 2008 Hackers on Planet Earth (HOPE) conference on why Mythbusters was forced to not do the "how easy it is to hack RFID tags" episode is very, very interesting.

  21. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are mistaken as to what is freedom of speech in USA, nobody is allowed to make direct threats of murder for example, but one can have an opinion that abortion doctors must be killed, it's an opinion.

    Of-course one person's opinion may lead to another person's action, but the correct thing to do is to hold the one who takes action as the responsible party, not the one who says he has an opinion.

    I am not American, in fact at this very moment I am in Germany, though I am Canadian, born in the former USSR.

    I hold every single thing that government says or does as suspicious, I don't trust government at all, in any single one thing ever, and I am not an American.

  22. Fry it by mwissel · · Score: 5, Informative

    What TFA forgets to mention is, that the ID card remains valid when you kill the RFID chip, as it still allows a person to be identified. Also, the fingerprint is a voluntary information to be stored. Most people won't know or bother and just let them store it anyway, though. For my fellow citizens: get yourself a new ID card w/o RFID just now (it is only a few Euros more expensive when you "loose" your current ID). If you have to get, for some reasons, an ID card with RFID on it, just put it in the microwave oven for a minute or so. Chaos Computer Club has proven this to kill the chip reliably.

  23. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by cpghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    However, the fundamental liberties encoded in the German Basic Law (it's not a Constitution in the US sense) have eroded substantially in the last decades, because, unlike the U.S. with is very reluctant to amend its Constitution, Germans love to modify their Grundgesetz regularly... mostly to make it worse, i.e. take one more liberty away.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  24. Re:Who woulda thunk it by no-body · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, mandatory chip implant...
    If you are without: Please come to the side and put your arms on the back. Click (handcuffs)- pfft, there you go, now you have one.

  25. Re:Who woulda thunk it by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    However, no ideologue, from the Left or Right, can reasonably claim we can house and feed the rest of the world as it decides to show up on our doorstep.

    Sure they can, perhaps not showing up on our doorstep, I mean a single nation can only hold so many people, but with universally available contraception so only people who want children have them, curbing population growth, and sustainable farming and forestry, there is enough arable land on the planet to feed and house 6 billion people.

    The problem is the insularity of nations, we want to make our own citizens happy but we don't give a shit about the rest of the world. I realise I am being absurdly idealistic but you claim it is not possible. It may never heppen, but it is quite possible for all nations to band together and guarantee welfare for all human beings

  26. Re:Who woulda thunk it (Idiocracy) by Skylinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    IPPA Computer: Welcome to the Identity Processsing Program of Uhmerica! Please insert your forearm into the forearm receptacle!
    IPPA Computer: Thank you! Please speak your name as it appears on your current federal identity card, document G24L8!
    Pvt. Joe Bowers: I'm not sure if...
    IPPA Computer: You have entered the name "Not Sure." Is this correct, Not Sure?
    Pvt. Joe Bowers: No, it's not correct...
    IPPA Computer: Thank you! "Not" is correct. Is "Sure" correct?
    Pvt. Joe Bowers: No, it's not, my name is Joe...
    IPPA Computer: You have already confirmed your first name is "Not." Please confirm your last name, "Sure."
    Pvt. Joe Bowers: My last name is not "Sure!"
    IPPA Computer: Thank you, Not Sure!
    Pvt. Joe Bowers: No, what I mean is my name is Joe...
    IPPA Computer: Confirmation is complete. Please wait while I tattoo your new identity on your arm!

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
  27. Re:Who woulda thunk it by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It may never heppen, but it is quite possible for all nations to band together and guarantee welfare for all human beings"

    That's utter babble, not insight. It is theoretically possible for winged monkeys to fly out my arse, but it isn't likely.

    What you are proposing is Communism, which has the minor drawback of containing the seeds of its own destruction in the power structures it must have to be made government.

    It makes no sense for everyone that has anything to sacrifice themselves for their less-accomplished, less-competent, culturally-self-destructive fellow humans who will just drink the well dry. Why should I want to live in a mud hut so everyone else can live in mud hut?

    Do-gooder humans have an interesting tendency to ignore likely outcomes of implementing their ideas.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. COUGH!! I just inhaled my morning coffee. by crovira · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just hope you're proud of yourself...

    Actually its "Minority Report" all over again...

    Imagine NEVER AGAIN being able to do anything you're ashamed of.

    Be PROUD of being kinky, 'cause EVERYBODY's gonna know.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  29. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by yyxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The lessons have been forgotten, so authoritarianism and militarism are once again on the rise in Europe, and will once again lead to the world burning.

    Having lived in Europe on and off, sadly, I can confirm this. Part of the problem is European arrogance: for more than two centuries, Americans have had to listen to Europeans about how superior their culture and political systems are, only to watch them self-destruct like clockwork. Europeans simply can't imagine that their supposedly superior culture leads to mass destruction and mass murder, again and again.

    That is the cycle of human history, and it cannot be broken, since no matter what lessons you might learn, your children won't, and their children certainly won't care.

    Other continents haven't been following this cycle. The US has had centuries of continuity and progress. South America and Africa don't have stability at all, but they don't have European delusions of grandeur either.

    There is something uniquely wrong with European politics and European culture.

  30. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know, we live in a vastly different world than the ones before us. We are continuously confronted with what war achieves. Together with that, the introduction of the Euro means that we Europeans are very much in trouble together when we start a war with our neighbor. The history of the world is changing very rapidly, if there was any cycle it might well and truly be broken by now.

    The most aggressive country by far is the US. It makes war with countries that never even threatened the US. It takes the drug war outside it's borders and destabilizes large parts of the world because of it (instead of ending their own problems with poverty). That the US does not have any wars inside of its borders (and outside of prisons) does not mean that there is no war there. So let the first country without sin cast the first stone.

    The most troubling thing for me is the economic stability. If masses of people get out of work and there is mass poverty, then political correctness is the first to suffer (like in pre-Nazi Germany, were the nation went bankrupt after the first world war).

  31. Re:right, before Zee Germans get there by rcamans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is illegal to threaten anyone in America with murder or any other form of harm. You have been reading and believing too many anti-American rags. (all rags published in Europe, for example).
    Cut down your own arrogance a few notches.

    Your government (Germany) has been maximum evil overlords more than once. Why do you have the idea that they have changed? Maybe they have learned to be less obvious about it, and not get caught?

    The American gov sucks big time, and will abuse any power that they can get their hands on, legally or illegally.
    Your gov is the same.

    The only difference is the morals and ethics of the people currently in the gov with access to these powers.
    American gov employees are low on the morals scale.
    I am sure Germans are similar. I think there is something about working for the gov, and military, that reduces morals, and attracts people with low morals, like our Bill Clinton, and a recent top gov official in Germany?

    Comparing bad to bad just wastes time and energy. They are all bad. Get over it. Stop crowing that your bad gov is not as bad as ours.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  32. Re:God bless America! by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Americans are NOT required to carry ID at all times.

    Neither are us Germans (yet), we only have to own one. Most people do carry it, though.

    --
    (+1, Disagree)
  33. Look, an astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does this even get modded up? Are slashdotters that uninformed?

    The standard requires the chip interaction to work at least up to 20cm distance. That doesn't mean it stops working at 21cm. In the same way the car whisperer guys talked to bluetooth carkits kilometres away that was only supposed to work up to ten metres, you can stretch RFID to at least 20 metres. In fact, that demonstration was why USA RFID passports come with tin foil embedded. And you only need a metre or two for a detonator to go off.

    Before you think that's alright then: Other governments don't provide that tin foil at all, still denying the problem.

    The chip is still uniquely addressable every time. You don't need to get the mark's name from his ID card (you've done your homework), and you can figure out what RFID tags he's carrying even on a busy street by following him long enough, like how cars find their own RFIDed tyre pressure meters.

    As to BAC vs PACE, I don't really care. Broken by design is BAD, and I don't want RFID in my ID cards at all. No, fixing it up with spit and baling wire, excuse me, tin foil, is not good enough. For my privacy and security both, ID needs to not be readable without me even noticing. Same goes for RFID payments and a whole raft of other things. I want proper design, not this new technology vendor solution looking for a problem pushing jerkfest. It's sticky man. Get me a clean card already.

  34. Re:Who woulda thunk it by bart416 · · Score: 2

    I somehow feel like I'm repeating myself, governments have better things to do than track everybody and everything. If they want to track somebody or a certain group of people they'll do it no matter what, tracking 100 people or tracking 1000 won't raise the costs of their operation that much. If they're so poised on tracking you, they can already track your mobile phone everywhere you go anyway actually; yet I'm sure you're constantly using it. You probably have a digital tv that could keep track of everything you watch and they could have filled your computer's HD with trojans through a backdoor the manufacturer was forced to install and the microwave oven could keep track of how much times you eat per day and kill you if it deems you're not an economical asset by using the RFID tag in your identity card to target you and boil you from the inside out. Really, where does the paranoia stop, but yes the government is out to get all of us! Not to mention the technical challenge of reading a near field RFID tag from a distance of over 1m. You might think it's easy but guess what, it isn't. Near field is generally anything under 20cm. And while that might seem pointless to you, anybody who ever bothered to study electronics will note there are a few problems with the tracking theory at this point. The coil and electronics in the RFID tag were designed with this distance in mind and as such are limited in power. You might be familiar with the law of Biot-Savart. Next combine it with the definition of magnetic flux and you might want to slap the result inside the electromagnetic induction formula and you'll see how unrealistic this task really is. Additionally why is it people automatically make the assumption the government only has evil intentions?

  35. Re:God bless America! by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although you may not be a troll, your information comes from bad movies, or old ones maybe.. Don't know.. If you could get past a little paranoia, and sense of superiority, and actually travel to Europe.. I think you would be shocked at how wrong your view of the world is.

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  36. Re:God bless America! by metalligoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to a Supreme Court decision, in every state you are required to show your drivers license or state ID if requested by a peace officer. (Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 2004)