Slashdot Mirror


China's Nine-Day Traffic Jam Tops 62 Miles

A traffic jam on the Beijing-Tibet expressway has now entered its ninth day and has grown to over 62 miles in length. This mother-of-all delays has even spawned its own micro-economy of local merchants selling water and food at inflated prices to stranded drivers. Can you imagine how infuriating it must be to see someone leave their blinker on for 9 days?

198 comments

  1. i thought they all rode bikes in China by alen · · Score: 1, Funny

    being how they are the first in the world in being green

    1. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      I could've sworn China was red.

    2. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're being sarcastic, but this used to be true. Rapid changes in China's internal economic policy have created a growing "middle class" whose buying habits are much like those of American consumers. That includes a new interest in automobiles, as status symbols and otherwise, resulting in China becoming the largest car market in the world. That's right: China now buys more cars than anybody, and that wasn't true just a few years ago. 33 years ago there were only about a million cars in all of China. There are now four million cars on the streets of Beijing alone, and the Chinese bought 13.6 million cars in 2009. Americans only bought 10.4 million.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are also places where once ubiquitous bicycles are banned because they "impede traffic flow". Too bad for the giant traffic jams created through stupid planning (ie. thinking bikes were causing congestion, idea of one car per person) and 1950s mentality (car is a status symbol). Now instead of China avoiding the shit that US and must of western has w.r.t. oil dependence, carbon footprint and overall sustainability of their economy, they are repeating it! But there will be nothing like subsidized gasoline - what could possibly go wrong??

      http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/27/gas-inflation-china-oped-cx_dhs_0528oilchina.html
            2008 - "Gasoline in the U.S. now sells for around $4 per gallon, but it sells for $2.49 per gallon in China."

      Now if India would only buy as many cars....

    4. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by curunir · · Score: 1

      That includes a new interest in automobiles, as status symbols and otherwise, resulting in China becoming the largest car market in the world.

      One of the ironies of this is that it's probably going to be what saves the American auto industry. The historic dislike of many of the neighboring Asian countries means that a number of the brands that are popular in America have very little of the Chinese market. And American cars are seen very popular and often seen as the luxury alternative to cheap Chinese cars. IIRC, Buicks are quite popular there since that's what the emperor drove back before even rich people could think of owning an automobile there.

      The American auto industry has lost the US market to the Japanese/Koreans at the low end and the Germans at the high end, but with the Chinese market expanding the way it is, that may not matter much.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    5. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The cheap Chinese goods that go to Africa are different cheap Chinese goods that the ones that go to the US and Europe...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we thought the Japanese can't drive!!

    7. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      being how they are the first in the world in being green
         

      but this used to be true

      When did it change, because I'm still hearing folks claim that 'the US is falling behind green China?' Are they talking about the same car buying, coal guzzling, smog breathing, reactor building, dustbowl China we are?

      Some half-smart knob is now going to chime in with per-capita this and per-capita that. If there was any doubt that China is climbing the same consuption curve then this nine-day traffic jam dominated by six-month old cars should dispell it. Your per-capita argument has a big fat expiration date.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    8. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by Vash21 · · Score: 1

      You're being sarcastic, but this used to be true. Rapid changes in China's internal economic policy have created a growing "middle class" whose buying habits are much like those of American consumers. That includes a new interest in automobiles, as status symbols and otherwise, resulting in China becoming the largest car market in the world. That's right: China now buys more cars than anybody, and that wasn't true just a few years ago. 33 years ago there were only about a million cars in all of China. There are now four million cars on the streets of Beijing alone, and the Chinese bought 13.6 million cars in 2009. Americans only bought 10.4 million.

      Would like to know where you got your numbers because if you had done a little more digging into U.S. sales you would have seen that most would conclude the current state of the U.S. economy is too blame. I did find the 10.4 million for 2009, but also found a 16.7 million for 2006, 3.1 million more than China in 2009. That info combined with the fact that the numbers for 2008 was 13.2 million and 2007 was 16.1 million you start see why I and many others might conclude that the Chinese economy is almost caught up to the where the U.S. economy was (and hopefully will be again..... hopefully)

      If I had a login to motorintelligence.com like the forbes article above me I could probably give you an even more comprehensive picture, but this is all google could dig up for me in a few mins

    9. Re:i thought they all rode bikes in China by DaCentaur · · Score: 1

      Yes, they were quite "green" and now, like the rest of the world, they are hooked on industry, technology, and consumption and are slowly becoming "black" (because of the carbon and NOT because of hip-hop).

  2. Holy crap! by Anarki2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nine days?? I think I would walk home. Even if its 50 miles, that could be covered in nine days.I mean holy shit, wtf is the problem over there?

    --
    The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    1. Re:Holy crap! by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Walk home and lose your car?

      Not in China.

    2. Re:Holy crap! by operagost · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not that every vehicle has been stuck in there for nine days: it's that the traffic has been crawling for nine days. Usually a traffic jam clears out at a later hour, but volume is too high even at night.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Holy crap! by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why the jam is lasting so long: people just abandoning their vehicles. (No, I haven't RTFA yet)

    4. Re:Holy crap! by BStroms · · Score: 1

      Nine days?? I think I would walk home. Even if its 50 miles, that could be covered in nine days.I mean holy shit, wtf is the problem over there?

      From the article it doesn't look as if traffic is blocked or anything. It's just continuously highly congested for nine days straight. So it's not like you're stuck their for nine days. It's more like you're stuck there for nine hours every time you need to make the trip. Some actual numbers for how long it does take to get from one end to the other would be nice though.

    5. Re:Holy crap! by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole journey is 3620km long, and takes about 3 days to drive in normal traffic. Traffic is getting through, it is just running slowly because of road works to widen the road. The delays have been going on for 9 days, but that doesn't mean it is the same cars as 9 days ago.

    6. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      BINGO!

      In my county, "rush hour" lasts 5 hours each direction, but few individual cars are in the mire for more than 90 minutes,

    7. Re:Holy crap! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I remember the evacuation traffic from Houston during hurricane Ike. Many people got stuck in traffic so bad that after traveling only 10-20 miles in 12 hours many people turned around and just rode the hurricane out.

    8. Re:Holy crap! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "The whole journey is 3620km long, and takes about 3 days to drive in normal traffic. Traffic is getting through, it is just running slowly because of road works to widen the road. The delays have been going on for 9 days, but that doesn't mean it is the same cars as 9 days ago."

      Huh? Article says: "Thousands of vehicles were bogged down Monday in a more than 100-kilometre (62-mile) traffic jam leading to Beijing that has lasted nine days"

      Now maybe my reading comprehension sucks, but it sounds to me like there's 60+ miles of traffic and that traffic has been there for 9 days. I understand that a few cars join and other's leave, but it does sound like it's taking days to get through it.

      I think it's a trap so we stop fearing them. "We are very simple people with very small (highway). We cannot achieve so much with such small (highway), but you American wow, (highway) so big, so big (highway)!"

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    9. Re:Holy crap! by macwhizkid · · Score: 1

      Nine days?? I think I would walk home.

      There's a difference between a standstill traffic jam and a "still moving, just really slowly" traffic jam. Even though the summary implies the first, it seems clear from the article and picture that cars are moving, just slowly. Otherwise, you'd see people out of their vehicles, rioting in the streets, etc. Still it calls into question at what point should the road just be closed (or more likely, heavily restricted) until the construction is done. At the very least, it's indicative of some poor urban planning on somebody's part.

      It's so interesting to watch China struggle with these issues. The whole country really just resembles, IMO, the annoying 13-year old kid at the family reunion who desperately wants to sit at the adult table instead of with the younger kids, yet really hasn't learned the proper manners or social skills to be able to succeed. So he tries to get what he wants by slapping, hitting, or kicking the other people at the table. And completely offends everyone else in the process.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying western culture is the epitome of goodness, but I can't remember the last time my government ignored a 100km traffic jam whilst busying itself issuing news blackouts to CNN.

    10. Re:Holy crap! by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      Huh? Article says: "Thousands of vehicles were bogged down Monday in a more than 100-kilometre (62-mile) traffic jam leading to Beijing that has lasted nine days" Now maybe my reading comprehension sucks, but it sounds to me like there's 60+ miles of traffic and that traffic has been there for 9 days. I understand that a few cars join and other's leave, but it does sound like it's taking days to get through it.

      Are you for real? You actually believe its the same cars stuck in there for 9 days and not just a traffic bottleneck being over reported? So later in the article when it says that "The congestion was expected to last into mid-September as the road project will not be finished until then" you actually think the same cars will be stuck in traffic until mid-september?

    11. Re:Holy crap! by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's the only time in my life that I have been embarassed by Texas (and particularly for some of my extended family who were part of the problem).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Holy crap! by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Funny

      So later in the article when it says that "The congestion was expected to last into mid-September as the road project will not be finished until then" you actually think the same cars will be stuck in traffic until mid-september?

      Those poor people...

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    13. Re:Holy crap! by stewbacca · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That's the only time in my life that I have been embarassed by Texas (and particularly for some of my extended family who were part of the problem).

      What about the time we provided a two-term President?

    14. Re:Holy crap! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you for real? You actually believe its the same cars stuck in there for 9 days and not just a traffic bottleneck being over reported?

      I doubt cars have been stuck in there for all 9 days, but keep in mind that there are food and water vendors, which implies that cars are in fact stationary in the same place for an extended period.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:Holy crap! by Again · · Score: 1

      So later in the article when it says that "The congestion was expected to last into mid-September as the road project will not be finished until then" you actually think the same cars will be stuck in traffic until mid-september?

      Those poor people...

      I see what you referenced there.

    16. Re:Holy crap! by cyfer2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The picture used in the AP news are traffic jam from an unrelated area. I call this good journalism. Following are some news from the real traffic jam, so you can get the real picture. A, B, C, D, E, F, G

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    17. Re:Holy crap! by ISoldat53 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of the party in Hitchhiker's Guide that lasted for generations.

    18. Re:Holy crap! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hey, I like that guy. Of course, I was only talking about what I was embarased by, but the "miss me yet" billboards are showing up in more places in Texas, so I doubt I'm the only one who's OK with him.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re:Holy crap! by sarysa · · Score: 1

      If you have a beater and you'd lose more money by not showing up at work, it'd be smarter to just abandon the car.

      What kind of penalties do you incur in China for abandoning a car?
      Not to mention, how many people in that nightmare pileup have run out of gas?

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    20. Re:Holy crap! by hldn · · Score: 1

      i'm hoping it's galaxy quest!

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    21. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just had to bring that one up. Thank God he didn't settle in Houston after the nightmare.

    22. Re:Holy crap! by daveime · · Score: 1

      Still it calls into question at what point should the road just be closed

      I'm pretty sure those people are there because they have to be, not because the actually *like* driving 3260km.

      So how would closing this mahor highway (thus diverting all that traffic through tiny villages and dirt tracks presumably) enable them to get home any faster ?

    23. Re:Holy crap! by ktappe · · Score: 1

      It's not that every vehicle has been stuck in there for nine days: it's that the traffic has been crawling for nine days. Usually a traffic jam clears out at a later hour, but volume is too high even at night.

      Sorry, that does not appear to be true.
      (Scroll down to the guys sitting in a circle in the middle of the road playing cards. That is not "crawling" that is "shut off your engine and sit for days".)

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    24. Re:Holy crap! by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      i'm hoping it's galaxy quest!

      It was Galaxy Quest. By Grabthar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan, I had to post that.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    25. Re:Holy crap! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      It can't be worse than driving from Anaheim to Pasadena, can it?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    26. Re:Holy crap! by masmullin · · Score: 1

      Why would he lose the car? Its not like its going anywhere? He can come back and get it next week.

    27. Re:Holy crap! by masmullin · · Score: 1

      Just come back next week (pay attention to the radio for when they report that the jam is easing), and pick up your car.

    28. Re:Holy crap! by masmullin · · Score: 1

      "miss me yet"

      No.

    29. Re:Holy crap! by joe_garage · · Score: 1

      this is a typical drive in toronto on the DVP or 401 -- it SEEMS like 9 days

    30. Re:Holy crap! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It worked out well for Michael Douglas didnt it?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    31. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The picture used in the AP news are traffic jam from an unrelated area. I call this good journalism. Following are some news from the real traffic jam, so you can get the real picture.
      A, B, C, D, E, F, G

      Blah, so it's mainly a truck jam?

      We have comparable truck jams which last for weeks here almost every year lately.

      Here being Finland, jams being trucks trying to get through Russian border.

    32. Re:Holy crap! by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Holy bad journalism. That really changes how I look at the problem. Cars just generally suck, but freight trucks are fairly necessary if we want to continue to live in cities.

    33. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you walk, then the traffic jam will last twice as long if you leave you car there

    34. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the only time in my life that I have been embarassed by Texas (and particularly for some of my extended family who were part of the problem).

      What about the time we provided a two-term President?

      Not a Texan, but if I was I would be more embarrassed that we ELECTED that two-term President

    35. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to let you in on two little secrets:

      1) As an artifact of reconstruction, Texas has a weak Governor - technically the vice governor has more authority. Someone with a lot of initiative can get stuff done as governor, but it is also a safe place to put idiots where they can't do much actual harm, but still feel important.

      2) George W. Bush was not born in Texas.

    36. Re:Holy crap! by fishbowl · · Score: 1
      Actually, it appears that individual vehicles *are* getting stuck *for days.*

      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129395326

      People are getting stuck for long enough to create cottage industries for villagers. I guess those drivers who are lucky enough to be stuck near a village are the ones getting food and water.

      Here is a quote that raised my eyebrows;

      Wang, driving from Hohhot to Tianjin in a coal truck, had been on the Huai'an section for three days and two nights. "We are advised to take detours, but I would rather stay here since I will travel more distance and increase my costs," Wang said. "The number of roads from northwest China to Beijing are limited," he complained, asking "Why should I pay the toll fee?"

      http://china.globaltimes.cn/society/2010-08/566070_2.html

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    37. Re:Holy crap! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      2) George W. Bush was not born in Texas.

      So not being born in a particular state prohibits you from being from that state?

      Bush went to school in Texas from Kindergarten to 9th grade. He finished high school (because he had to follow his political father around) not in Texas. He then went to a couple Ivy league colleges and then, wait for it...moved back to Texas in 1968, where he's lived ever since (minus 8 years as President). That makes at least 44 years of his life living in Texas (not sure when he moved back to Texas after being born in MA, but at a minimum he was there for Kindergarten at age 6). Had he not been President for 8 years, he most likely would be up to 52 years in Texas.

      He's Texan.

      Is this really that hard?

    38. Re:Holy crap! by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      Nine days?? I think I would walk home. Even if its 50 miles, that could be covered in nine days.I mean holy shit, wtf is the problem over there?

      Well for starters it's a nation full of asian drivers! Ba-dum-pa! Someone was going to say it.

  3. That gives me an idea by Cetme · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cue the Chinese remake of "Falling Down"...

    1. Re:That gives me an idea by Bardez · · Score: 1

      Thank you, sir. I lol'd

      --
      Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
    2. Re:That gives me an idea by operagost · · Score: 1

      With the epidemic of Chinese guys knifing students, that seems frighteningly possible. Hope there aren't any school buses caught in this jam.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:That gives me an idea by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

      So then the guy walking would be Chinese and the guy with the convenience store in the beginning would be American?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    4. Re:That gives me an idea by gandhi_2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You forgot your briefcase!!!!

    5. Re:That gives me an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I would of gone with the opening scene of "Office Space".

      It's hard to improve upon the original though. Only thing I can think of is to either make it an elderly couple or a grandmother carrying a baby on her back.

    6. Re:That gives me an idea by retchdog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, he could still be Korean and it'd work.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    7. Re:That gives me an idea by sharkey · · Score: 1

      This is a Chinese remake. I think you mean "ror'd".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:That gives me an idea by daveime · · Score: 1

      Flied lice ? It is fried rice, you plick !

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment ... yes, and it's also been about 10ms since my last neuron fired. Your point was ???

    9. Re:That gives me an idea by masmullin · · Score: 1

      You funny! I raf out roud!

  4. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no alternate routes in China? No cell phones? No GPS? No traffic reports on radio stations? No police coordination?

    1. Re:WTF by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the 3620km inter-province highway, probably not. Cell phones tend not to work outside cities, and Tibet is a very rural area.

    2. Re:WTF by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Cell phones tend not to work outside cities,

      Whilst that may be true for your country, and perhaps China, here in SE England I can get a signal almost anywhere, including rural areas. Unfortunately it's sometimes only Basic GSM and unfortunately not full 3G HSDPA (or sometimes not even GPRS!), but I've yet to find somewhere on a major motorway without a mobile signal.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    3. Re:WTF by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Please go to your world atlas and compare the land area of the SE England with that of the US or China. Think it might be just a tiny bit easier to cover all of SE England with cell towers than all of the US or China?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:WTF by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I live in South East England as well, and yes, I get a cellphone signal almost anywhere in this region. However, while there are lots of green places, it is the 2nd most densely populated part of England after the North West and England is near the top of the population density tables for Europe. If you exclude the city states and micronations, only Holland has a higher population density than England. If you bring in the rest of the UK, then it falls below Belgium in the table.

      If you go to for example the Scottish highlands, you don't get a phone signal outside the towns and larger villages, and I suspect if you go to rural Scandinavia especially in the North, you won't find many cell towers. For comparison with China, Tibet is like northern Scandinavia, Beijing is like the South East of England.

    5. Re:WTF by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      You missed my point - it's not just city\not city for mobile reception, but population density comes into it as well. I suspect that China has a high enough population density so that the drivers would get signal all the way.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    6. Re:WTF by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      That was kind of my point; I suspect that even rural China has a high population density along major routes, so phone signal shouldn't be a problem.

      Off topic, with the regular stories of "unprepared person rescued after texting friend\posting to facebook" and so on, I'm surprised that the Highlands have low signal coverage - it seems like everyone is sending messages from them; on an even more off-topic but related note, I once sent an email from a village halfway up the foothills of the Himalayas, admittedly from an internet cafe, but still, 'net connections are everywhere now (even if it was really slow).

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    7. Re:WTF by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The population density in the US and China is not evenly distributed. However, it is relatively easy to ensure cell reception along major highways, so I would expect both US and China to do that rather well.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Shut Down Access? by rotide · · Score: 0, Troll

    At what point do you declare the road closed and stop new traffic from adding to the problem? I have to imagine that gridlock starts forming at all the on-ramps as cars are simply unable to move once on the ramp causing people to do u-turns, etc, which causes its own hazards...

    There must be alternate routes, no matter how rural for those that _need_ to travel to do so. Letting people onto a highway that is backed up for 62+ miles is just irresponsible. Then again, this is China. Not that the government is entirely evil, but they don't have a track record of always looking out for their citizens best interests.

    1. Re:Shut Down Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letting people onto a highway that is backed up for 62+ miles is just irresponsible.

      Well, in their defense (not that I'm thrilled to defend the Chinese government), the first time a problem of this magnitude occurs is almost always a Chinese fire drill (heh) as politicians and bureaucrats try to solve the problem and cover their asses.

      It's the second (and later) time the problem occurs when they should have a policy in place that it becomes truly irresponsible.

    2. Re:Shut Down Access? by anagama · · Score: 1
      RTFA. This is the second time.

      Traffic slowed to a snail's pace in June and July for nearly a month, according to earlier press reports.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:Shut Down Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really expect government to have worked out a solution to a traffic problem in just 2 months?

    4. Re:Shut Down Access? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Letting people onto a highway that is backed up for 62+ miles is just irresponsible. Then again, this is China. Not that the government is entirely evil, but they don't have a track record of always looking out for their citizens best interests.''

      Maybe the government have decided to go libertarian and let people fend for themselves.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:Shut Down Access? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      There reason of these traffic jam is that the alternate route has been (half) closed for maintenance.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    6. Re:Shut Down Access? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sufficiently advanced libertarianism is indistinguishable from evil.

    7. Re:Shut Down Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cars are simply unable to move once on the ramp causing people to do u-turns, etc, which causes its own hazards...

      You've obviously never driven in China. Cars are unable to move, make illegal U-turns, and drive the wrong way on narrow one way streets every day in normal traffic. There is probably less of a hazard here, because the cars are at least moving slowly!

      There must be alternate routes, no matter how rural for those that _need_ to travel to do so.

      Try looking at a map. There are not that many options unless you want to go 9-10 hours out of the way. That's assuming you can get off the highway and turn around to get on in the other direction so that you can backtrack.

      China is growing too big for itself very quickly. There are so many people here. If you've never been outside the US, the largest and most crowded place you've ever been is probably smaller than an average day in downtown Beijing or Shanghai. The US is designed for people to drive, with only a few cities having decent public transportation options. China has not gotten there yet, and the roads cannot handle the traffic.

      Why do you think Beijing has laws that prevents 1/5 of the cars in the city from driving on any given weekday? If everyone had a car here, like in the US, the roads would be unusable.

    8. Re:Shut Down Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are not that many options unless you want to go 9-10 hours out of the way.

      Well, then that's actually a great option compared to the nine days this jam has been going, isn't it?

    9. Re:Shut Down Access? by Amlothi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this modded insightful? It isn't. You are thinking about this from the perspective of what would happen in the US, and China is not the same. Obviously the poster and the mods have never spent much time in China.

      There are more people here that you can imagine. The infrastructure cannot keep up with the population growth. In this particular area, the only alternate road is under construction. Look at a map. It would take an extra 9 hours at least if you take an alternate route, and that is provided you can get off the highway, turn around, and go back.

      The government does it's best to control the traffic, but the number of people with cars is growing faster than they can keep up. In Beijing, you can only drive your car in the city 4 days a week. (Everyone has 1 day they are not allowed to drive, and it rotates.) Traffic is still horrible, even with 1/5 of the cars parked at home every day.

      It is a major throughfare connecting to the capital city. You cannot just "close access" to the entire highway for a 60 mile stretch. You would essentially be cutting off all of those rural communities from the rest of the country for the entire summer until the construction projects are complete.

      It just isn't feasible.

      cars are simply unable to move once on the ramp causing people to do u-turns, etc, which causes its own hazards...

      This confirms my suspicion what you have no idea what traffic is like in China. This (cars unable to move, illegal u-turns causing hazards, etc) happens all the time on a normal day here. The drivers are used to it, and they drive under the assumption that most people don't follow the rules.

      I realize that someone who has never left the US might not understand, and the gut reaction might be "OMG, look how uncivilized China is!" but that is just your ignorance showing through. The American media doesn't help, because (on some level) the powers that be want us to think that about China, so that is the national image of the PRC that is repeated over and over in the West.

      BTW, I was in Vermont during the Phish concert mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phish_festivals#Coventry
      The US isn't any better at handling the traffic situation. I don't recall them closing the highway in Vermont when this happened.

      --
      ~A~
    10. Re:Shut Down Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think people expected the traffic jam to be 9 days long? Sure, if they knew it was going to last 9 days they could have taken the other route.

  6. Idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This must be the first time the Idle category is really apt.

    1. Re:Idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There must be a lot of Infinti G35's stuck in the ... oh wait its China not Chinatown.

  7. Call the Doctor! by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I saw this on an episode of Doctor Who.

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:Call the Doctor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I saw this on an episode of Doctor Who.

      Gridlock
      Beware the Bliss...

    2. Re:Call the Doctor! by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Gridlock

    3. Re:Call the Doctor! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Doctor Hu?

    4. Re:Call the Doctor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I saw this on an episode of Doctor Who.

      Ack! I just posted about this! yay!

  8. False precision by DudeTheMath · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why convert from km to miles? TFA says it's over 100km, decidedly imprecise (it's probably not over 110km, but could easily be 104km). The poster converts for us to English measurements with an increased precision, with the implication that, while it's over 62 miles, it's not over 63.

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    1. Re:False precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why convert from km to miles? TFA says it's over 100km, decidedly imprecise (it's probably not over 110km, but could easily be 104km). The poster converts for us to English measurements with an increased precision, with the implication that, while it's over 62 miles, it's not over 63.

      YES!!! Thank you. I know I learned the concept of "significant digits" in high school for a reason.

    2. Re:False precision by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Re your sig:

      Yes, I live in California. We spend 578 MILLION on high schools in districts with dropout rates approaching 50%, so we can drive fast. You do the math.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:False precision by atrain728 · · Score: 1

      Actually, TFA cites the 62 mile figure as well.

    4. Re:False precision by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Parent is serious.

      I'm so glad the LAUSD has solved all its financial woes, so that it can spend this kind of money on schools.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:False precision by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      I should have said "TFAH". You are correct. I should not have blamed the poster.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    6. Re:False precision by severoon · · Score: 1

      I object to your sig.

      Travelling at speed on the highway is not about getting to your destination marginally faster. It's about keeping the flow of traffic up to prevent marginally more deaths and injuries.

      I know it doesn't directly say it, but your sig implies that it's perfectly reasonable to merge onto the highway at 60 when everyone else is doing 80. No, that's not ok, it's not safe, people won't slow down, they'll go around you and it'll cause an avoidably dangerous situation. AND everyone gets to their destination 2 minutes faster.

      Slower != safer. Every country that's studied it has figured this out except the US. :-/

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    7. Re:False precision by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      And I must note that NPR's article has a more correct "60-mile stretch."

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    8. Re:False precision by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Every country that's studied it has figured this out except the US. :-/"

      Including the US, which raised speed limits from 55 to 75 MPH. 75 is pretty good, not just compared to 55.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    9. Re:False precision by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      No, I'm sorry, but you completely misread my sig. I explicitly ask whether it's necessary to pass someone (every maneuver has some level of risk), not whether you should keep up with prevailing traffic. In fact, it seems to me that I'm encouraging travel at the prevailing speed (at least that of the vehicle ahead of you). I never equate slower with safer; I exhort a simple risk vs. reward analysis. But there's only so much you can pack into 120 characters.

      As a recovering math instructor, I picked speeds so the answer comes out just under one minute (with the distance pulled out of some memory about the length of the median urban highway trip).

      The original problem comes out of a weekly trip I used to make on a rural two-lane highway (US-12 in southern Michigan) passing through some small town (where it widens to four lanes, but you can expect a strictly enforced speed limit) about every ten miles. I would not infrequently come up behind someone doing 50 in a 55, and start the "can I pass this guy" dance. It did wonders for my stress levels when I took a few seconds to say, okay, it's only three miles to Soycornhogton, I will lose about twenty-seven seconds if I just stay behind him. Again, the 120-character limit.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    10. Re:False precision by severoon · · Score: 1

      You're saying most roads in the US do not have average traffic speeds faster than the posted limits? Show me these roads, that I may drive on them.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    11. Re:False precision by severoon · · Score: 1

      The original problem comes out of a weekly trip I used to make on a rural two-lane highway (US-12 in southern Michigan) passing through some small town (where it widens to four lanes, but you can expect a strictly enforced speed limit) about every ten miles. I would not infrequently come up behind someone doing 50 in a 55, and start the "can I pass this guy" dance.

      When I drive from SF to LA on I-5, that's a two lane road as well. When slower traffic camps out in the left lane, it creates a dangerous situation. No offense to you personally—but when someone like you pulls up behind that person and slows down without encouraging them to get out of the way, the situation gets more dangerous, not less. Now that's two cars everyone else has to figure out how to get around.

      The solution is to raise speed limits to a reasonable level and have police ticket people that are not actively passing on the left, as they do in many European countries. (In other words, if you're driving the same speed as the cars on your right for any significant length of road, get over or get a ticket.) Of course, this presumes that our road laws exist to make our trips as convenient and safe as possible, not raise revenue.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    12. Re:False precision by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      When I drive from SF to LA on I-5, that's a two lane road as well.

      No it's not. "rural two-lane highway" means two lanes total -- one in each direction. The minimum design standard for Interstates are 4 lanes with a median.

      The O.P. talking about having to do a "'can I pass this guy' dance" when overtaking because he'd have to cross into oncoming traffic to do it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  9. Gridlock by Baseclass · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't there be cars running out of gas all over the place?
    Sounds like the makings for permanent gridlock.

    --
    ^^vv<><>BA
  10. Significant figures by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

    When the article headline says "over 100km", the conversion -- if one is really required -- should be "over 60 miles".

    "The congestion was expected to last into mid-September as the road project will not be finished until then, the newspaper said."

    Sounds like they need to build some more railway.

    1. Re:Significant figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading past the headline you will find the first sentence which says

      "Thousands of vehicles were bogged down Monday in a more than 100-kilometre (62-mile) traffic jam leading to Beijing that has lasted nine days and highlights China's growing road congestion woes."

    2. Re:Significant figures by retchdog · · Score: 1

      The point still applies to the article.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:Significant figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you convert time from until mid-September into Imperial units for me?

    4. Re:Significant figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they need to build some more railway.

      Ignorant comment that ignores how extensive China's railway system is and how it already plays a vital role in China's transportation infrastructure? Or a cute, if subtle, SimCity reference?

    5. Re:Significant figures by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they need to build some more railway.

      Ignorant comment that ignores how extensive China's railway system is and how it already plays a vital role in China's transportation infrastructure?

      Perhaps I should have said "yet more railway", I'm aware of how fast China is adding to their network.

      But, it's smaller than I thought it was. 3000 passenger trains and 33,300 freight trains sounds big, but Britain runs 20000 trains a day. 1.3 billion journeys in China, 1.23 billion in Great Britain. However, the average journey in China is 20 times the distance.

  11. some people stay there for a long time... by jarkus4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    from another article (http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/08/23/china-traffic-jam.html?ref=rss): "Another driver, Wang, told Xinhua he'd been stuck in the traffic jam for three days and two nights."

    1. Re:some people stay there for a long time... by thijsh · · Score: 1

      "The traffic is no excuse to be late on the job!"
      I wonder how many of these guys in the traffic jam lost their jobs this month... given the fact the Chinese have an even stricter work-culture and an abundance of other people willing to take the job.

    2. Re:some people stay there for a long time... by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      It seemed to be mostly commercial traffic on the road
      http://img1.gtimg.com/news/pics/hv1/157/23/606/39411172.jpg

    3. Re:some people stay there for a long time... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Though it's quite unlikely they're staying in a traffic jam of 62 miles...which is simply almost exactly 100 km; just a nice round number for news headlines, meaning "somewhere in the range of 100km" - and translated to miles with pointless precision.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  12. For length, not so special by Gramie2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you look at traffic jams in Japan at the beginning and end of major holidays (New Year's, Golden Week, O-bon), the expressways around Tokyo usually have jams this long or longer. In the August 5-18 O-Bon holiday, they reported jams of more than 10 km occurring 596 times.

    That's what you get when you give most of the people in the country holidays at the same time.

  13. I say nay nay! by RevWaldo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Great American Traffic Jam More to the point and much funnier, with a stellar b-list cast! The epitome of the 70s car comedies. (Not on DVD? WTF!)

    .

  14. Come to Sao Paulo Brazil!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the record is over 266km of congestion. Admittedly not for nine days though.:-)

  15. blinkers ... by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine how infuriating it must be to see someone leave their blinker on for 9 days?

    You've never driven I-95 the length from NYC to Miami, have you?

    1. Re:blinkers ... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      NYC to Miami is only 19-20 hours.. not that bad of a drive - moves quick really.. just sucks when you get to Florida .. feel like its over but you still have 6 hours to go.. i always had it alittle worse.. didn't stop at Miami but rather went to the Keys/..// damn its a long way down there...

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:blinkers ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well when you hit Florida it doesn't matter. They all magically stop working anyway.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  16. I haven't tried this myself... by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    ... but how many cars can even idle for 9 days straight? I would think most cars in the jam would have run out of gas before day 9 came and went.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

      maybe everyone turns off their engines until the next couple meters opens up. even if someone runs out of gas, it probably would't be hard to keep up by pushing it in neutral.

    2. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by Arlet · · Score: 1

      The traffic jam is 9 days old. That doesn't mean the cars are stuck in there for 9 days. It could be that each car travels through the entire traffic jam in a few hours, but as soon as it's through, another car gets in line at the end.

    3. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      If traffic was that slow I would turn of the engine, put her in neutral and push.

    4. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      They should have plenty of fuel for that, while idling in traffic does burn up more fuel than driving straight through, I doubt very much that it takes that much more fuel. I think in this day and age it's fairly typical for a vehicle to have enough fuel for several times that distance. Although, if you didn't start in on a full tank of gas, you might be in trouble.

    5. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyota Prius with a full tank. That's about it.

    6. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ... but how many cars can even idle for 9 days straight? I would think most cars in the jam would have run out of gas before day 9 came and went.

      Asian traffic jams, they'll typically turn off the engine once they've been there for a while. Trying to get through Bangkok at about 4 PM is a nightmare. It took 15 minutes to drive the 25 KM from the airport and 30 minutes to get the 5 KM from the toll-way to my hotel. Feck if I had of known I would have walked it from the off ramp.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:I haven't tried this myself... by DaCentaur · · Score: 1

      So this traffic jam is like a water dam. Individual cars come and go but the total mass appears constant.

  17. Not Doctor Who - Omni Magazine, 1979 by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really miss Omni Magazine from the late '70s and early '80s, with its bold predictions of the Brave New World coming in the then-distant New Millenium. One of my favorite stories was The Great Moveway Jam, a dystopian story of a traffic jam started by a little old lady who put on her left blinker, but turned right.

    The story was based in California, 1998-9 -- but China in 2010 makes a lot more sense. Especially since the solution to the jam, which extended "from San Diego to Santa Barbara, and... seventy-nine miles inland", involved building a wall to prevent "jamees" from abandoning their immobile vehicles, and a Final Solution that involved a lot of helicopters, a *whole* lot of cement, and airdropped suicide pills.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Not Doctor Who - Omni Magazine, 1979 by Nethead · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I was trying to remember the name of that story.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:Not Doctor Who - Omni Magazine, 1979 by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Scary thing is that most every traffic jam currently is caused by that kind of cluelessness. Some asshole cutting someone else off, or turning without adequate warning, and generally not giving two shits about everyone else on the road, and it starts magnifying it's way back until you're stopped: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071219103102.htm

  18. Doctor Who by Beardydog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't this an episode of Doctor Who a couple of years ago? It turned out some kind of monster had organized the whole thing so it could eat people in the underground tunnels, I think.China should check for monsters.

    1. Re:Doctor Who by online-shopper · · Score: 1

      The face of Bo(Captain Jack) organized it to save them from a plague that wiped out the rest of the planet.

    2. Re:Doctor Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the giant crabs actually had grown up from the toxic fumes accumulatng in the lowest levels of the tunnels. The BELIEF, until they ran into the Face of Bo, was that the entire jam had actually been planned as a way to provide an alien species of crab with food (that was only for like 15 minutes of the episode though if I remember correctly). It's also the episode where Bo dies, with the Doctor conventiently leaving that fact out to him when they meet him later (End of the Ep, or next episode, I can't remember which.)

    3. Re:Doctor Who by losfromla · · Score: 1

      uh, no. It was the face of Boe, who was doing it to keep the population from going above-ground where things had really gone bad. The monsters were there to catch speeders, sort of by coincidence or something, but they definitely did not lock in the traffic.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re:Doctor Who by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be nitpicky, but no, that's not what happened. An extremely deadly virus broke out and killed people very quickly. The city was shut down and only the people in their cars survived. The system was set up so they'd perpetually stay in their cars even though the danger had passed. The monsters were a separate element that thrived in the changing environment.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Doctor Who by MooPi · · Score: 1

      Yo they need good ole Jack Burton to come the rescue if thats the case. Maybe he can find Egg Shen as well to tag along.

  19. Translated to English by IceDogg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here in the United States, we call this phenomenon "Atlanta".

    1. Re:Translated to English by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Here in Los Angeles, we call it "The 405"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Translated to English by veeren76 · · Score: 1

      Dallas hsa its 635.... always has traffic... even at 2 am, daily has around 5-6 accidents which i hear on radio...

      --
      Common sense is not common
    3. Re:Translated to English by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I'll see your top-end perimeter and raise you a Schuylkill Expressway at US-1.

    4. Re:Translated to English by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Obligatory: "55: A Meditation on the Speed Limit" (filmed on the Perimeter around Atlanta).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Translated to English by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Dangit; Slashcode ate the link!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Translated to English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Austin, TX.

  20. Tibet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly question where's the "Tibet" in the "Beijing-Tibet expressway"?

    Isn't Tibet over 3000 miles from Beijing?

    1. Re:Tibet? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      where's the "Tibet" in the "Beijing-Tibet expressway"?
      Isn't Tibet over 3000 miles from Beijing?

      It's 1,565 mi (2520 km) from Beijing to Tibet.
      This road is 2,249 mi (3620 km) long.

  21. Precisely false precision by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    And anyway, they should have said "over 62.13712 miles (approximately)" for even more impressive false precision.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Precisely false precision by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      Or you know, they could have left it in KM and not be idiots. Oh wait, American site. I almost forgot.

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    2. Re:Precisely false precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer 62 miles, 241 yards, 11.872512 inches.

    3. Re:Precisely false precision by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I prefer 62 miles, 241 yards, 11.872512 inches.

      I think you meant 62 miles, 1 furlong, 3 rods, 4 yards, 2 feet, 5 inches, 2 barleycorns, 2 lines, 8 mickeys.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  22. Science Fiction Novel Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This jam sounds like something out of a William Gibson novel. Kwan Xiahacker is 19 years old, and makes a living providing computer security to the residents of the Beijing-Tibet expressway trafficjam, where he was born.

    1. Re:Science Fiction Novel Idea by mwbeatty · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it reminded me of a Jonathan Lethem story "Access Fantasy" wherein people live in their cars due to a city wide traffic jam. Link to book

    2. Re:Science Fiction Novel Idea by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      It kinda makes me think China should implement moving roadways like Heinlein (and others no doubt) predicted.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  23. The next super power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm yeah.
    China's list of problems is endless.
    The ones that will end the "miracle" are a hyper aging population and a NIGHTMARE Communist Dictatorship Gov.

  24. The Rolling Traffic Jam by quatin · · Score: 1

    The rolling traffic jam can be thought of as a queue. Cars are can enter the queue at any rate. However, cars can only leave the queue every 2 seconds. The reason is that if you were stopped behind another car, you wouldn't jam your gas pedal at the exact second the car in front of you does. You would wait until that car moves 20-30 feet before moving your own car. This delay adds up for every car in the queue (let's approximate 2 seconds). So if there were 100 cars in the queue you would need 200 seconds before the last car in the queue moves and essentially eliminating the traffic jam. However, if cars are entering the queue at a rate faster than every 2 seconds, then the queue is growing in size and the traffic jam will never end.

    Further details and illustrations:
    http://www.smartmotorist.com/traffic-and-safety-guideline/traffic-jams.html

    1. Re:The Rolling Traffic Jam by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      This delay is also why the talk of smart cars eliminating traffic jams are (technically) possible. If all the cars on the roads are forming an ad hoc network and talking to each other about traffic, they can "see" a traffic jam forming ahead. Then, they can slow down the incoming traffic so, though there would still be cars arriving at the same point faster than every 2 seconds, you can hopefully delay most of them by enough that they arrive after the jam has been cleared. This, of course, relies on either digital speed limit signs that can be updated on the fly (with the majority of motorists obeying speed limits), or, it requires the majority of motorists to listen to their car when it requests they go under the speed limit. Logically, they would be inclined to slow down, because going 10 slower for a while beats being in a traffic jam. However, it ends up being a prisoner's dilemma sort of thing. If everybody else slows down, they all arrive a bit slower. If nobody slows down they arrive a lot slower. If everybody but you slows down, 1 car won't make a difference, and everybody arrives a bit slower, but you arrive just as fast as if there was never a jam at all (assuming you were far enough away when it started forming). So, everybody will want to be "that guy" and it won't work ;)

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  25. Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Move the cargo traffic to rail!

    1. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Thank God for another logical soul. I've been lobbying to get commercial trucks off of I-35 for 10 years now. It doesn't even have to be rail..why not make a new highway system just for commercial cargo? It wouldn't even have to be that great, because truck drivers are already used to being stuck in traffic (since they are generally causing the jams). And, it frees up Interstate travel for smaller, more manageable vehicles. It would probably improve safety as well.

    2. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Well, your lobbying must be working, because they're currently loading the entire trailer up onto train cars for the long-haul. Trucks pick them back up at the railhead and take them the last mile.

    3. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you checked out the CargoRail system?

      http://www.megarail.com/CargoRail_Heavy_Cargo/

    4. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Austin. Texas put a very large and well engineered roadway system just for the NAFTA trucks so they can travel through central Texas without having to deal with city traffic on I-35.

      Guess what? The dopes driving the 18 wheelers don't want to pay the couple dollars so they can go full speed around one of the nastier bottlenecked cities on their route. No. They rather just sit and clog up the road for hours just to save the cost of 1-2 Bud Lights or Coronas.

      What is needed are laws to force the guys with the big rigs to use the roads, or else they just won't bother because it saves them a couple dollars on a haul.

    5. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I've been lobbying to get commercial trucks off of I-35 for 10 years now.

      The irony being that the interstate highway system was designed for commercial traffic and for civil defense (moving military supplies easier across the country in the event of an invasion).

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Not here. We have trucks from all over Europe on Slovenian highways.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    7. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are, China is expanding its rail system (both freight and passenger) at an unmatched rate, and they are expanding their road system similarly. It's just that the number of goods and people moving around is growing faster.

    8. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A big rig causes 9,600 times as much road wear as a car, but doesn't pay 9,600 times as much in taxes. So a simple solution is to make them pay the full cost, based on the weight of the vehicle and the number of axles.

      Faced with paying the full cost of transporting goods, the shipping companies will use rail more often, and that will reduce traffic congestion and save us money on repairing the roads.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    9. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FWIW, that's not completely accurate. There is more to what constitutes wear on a highway than the vehicles that drive on it. You've got wear-and-tear from use, but you've also got to factor in the natural deprecation caused by weather, plants, etc.

      So if you wanted to assign true cost, you'd have a fixed fee (for all vehicles) assigned to cover the fixed costs, and a proportional fee levied to cover the variable use-dependent costs.

      Aside from that, your point stands.

      And I'd like to add that if we subsidize rail like we subsidize highways, it's be MUCH cheaper than currently, with much higher usage rates, and so we'd likely be able to afford a much better rail system.

      But for some reason we expect rail systems to be self-sufficient, while we sink billions upon billions into roads, highways, and waterways.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      The irony being that the interstate highway system was designed for commercial traffic and for civil defense (moving military supplies easier across the country in the event of an invasion).

      I'm also not sure the "commerce clause" would apply to nationally funded highways that didn't allow commercial traffic. Not that anyone follows that silly little constitution any more.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    11. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>
      And I'd like to add that if we subsidize rail like we subsidize highways, it's be MUCH cheaper than currently, with much higher usage rates, and so we'd likely be able to afford a much better rail system.

      You do know that China has a very extensive rail system, and they still got this mess?

      At any one time, there's a million people in transit in Beijing train stations alone.

    12. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...truck drivers are already used to being stuck in traffic (since they are generally causing the jams).

      If that's true, then why does the worst traffic (i.e., "rush hour") coincide with the commuters?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Move the cargo traffic to rail! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You do know that China has a very extensive rail system, and they still got this mess?

      Yes. But this thread was discussing a single component of the traffic solution, which is long-haul trucking wear-and-tear on the roads. Reducing the wear-and-tear would decrease the amount of time spent repairing the road system (which is what is causing this jam). It wouldn't eliminate it, but it would help.

      At any one time, there's a million people in transit in Beijing train stations alone.

      Those million people in transit in Beijing are using local rail. That is a substitute for vehicular passenger traffic, not freight.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  26. How about over 100 miles? by Motard · · Score: 1

    The French have them beat...

    According to a number of sites, the longest traffic jame ever was from Lyon to Paris on February 16, 1980. The congestion was 176 kilometers long (109 miles). It was caused by many people return from the skiing holidays and bad weather.

  27. Just like a Phish festival. by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

    No big deal. Park. Walk. Return.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  28. double decker trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not load up cars onto trailers. have two trailers for the cars and a third one for passengers with snack service and TVs. It would be civilized like train travel, but using existing highways and reduce congestion.

  29. Just walk! by strayant · · Score: 1

    So this jam is about 100km (62 miles) long. At an average human walking pace of 80m/min, that's about 21 hours. I'd rather walk... even with a load on my back.

    1. Re:Just walk! by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Are you going to carry your car with you? OR are you going to be a jackhole and leave it there, making the jam last longer?

    2. Re:Just walk! by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      You could make some money along the way if you also took a load on your face

      drumroll please. Thank you, I'll be here all week.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    3. Re:Just walk! by daremonai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you, I'll be here all week.

      Well, yeah, considering you're stuck in that traffic jam.

    4. Re:Just walk! by strayant · · Score: 1

      How about just leave the car at home... pending some prior knowledge that you shouldn't be driving in this mess at this point. As in, watch the news and plan.

    5. Re:Just walk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could make some money along the way if you also took a load on your face

      That's Japan, not China.

  30. You did by idji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was the 2007 Doctor Who episode Grid Lock where in the year 5 billion and 53 the traffic in New New York was so bad it took 6 years to travel 10 miles in the high occupancy lane.

  31. in soviet china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    traffic drives Yu! :) sorry couldn't resist

    1. Re:in soviet china by scuzzlebutt · · Score: 0

      Just to be pedantic, "soviet" is a Russian word meaning "council", so it doesn't apply to China.

      --
      In C++, your friends can see your privates.
  32. Iam an Anonymos Coward :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell have you added the picture of New Delhi's traffic
    thats not china

  33. Naples, Italy by LordAzuzu · · Score: 1

    That's what usually happens in Naples 2-3 times a day :)
    Well, not really, only some kilometers long, but hey, WTF! 100km!!!

  34. It's a supply and demand problem by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    ...and so there's an easy solution. When wants exceed supply, this is a sign that the price is too low. The market solution is to raise the price until supply and demand equalize.

    Sadly, we haven't learned this in America. We prefer to maintain the illusion that freeways are free, even though the market solution would be cheaper in the end.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  35. Anything America can do, China can do bigger by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    That was it really.

     

    --
    Deleted
  36. Dont raf too rong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rife get ronery when friends go away.

    1. Re:Dont raf too rong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rife get ronery when fliends go array.

      FTFY

    2. Re:Dont raf too rong. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Array? Array?

      He's Chinese, not Elmer fucking Fudd!



      Ignolant plick!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  37. The Southern Thruway by Rotten · · Score: 1

    "The Southern Thruway" is a short story by "Julio Cortazar" that depicts the microeconomy and social interaction of a group of people struck in a days long traffic jam in Paris. He wrote it around 1960-1970.

    Sometimes reality turns fiction obsolete....

  38. rail only reduces road usage by a tiny percentage by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Something like 3%. it is horrendously expensive for that 3%.

    --
    Deleted
  39. How are people refilling their tanks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't people run out of gas?

  40. Re:rail only reduces road usage by a tiny percenta by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Something like 3%. it is horrendously expensive for that 3%.

    3% of what?

    The article says the problem is partly caused by freight being brought into Beijing, although the pictures show mostly cars.

    The cost depends what your priorities are, and what you can externalise (railways tend to have far fewer accidents, take up much less land, use much less fuel, create much less pollution etc -- suddenly roads don't seem so cheap).

    Anyway, China is building railways -- something like 50% of new railways in the next decade are going to be built in China.

  41. USian Cars Fail Chinese Fuel Efficiency Standards by meehawl · · Score: 1

    American cars are seen very popular and often seen as the luxury alternative to cheap Chinese cars.

    Unfortunately, most of the products of the US car industry are insufficiently fuel efficient to meet China's fuel economy standards. This means US cars have to be built as local Chinese/US ventures, which reduces the economic benefits. It's significant then, that the Chinese versions of US cars are able to economically meet and surpass China's fuel efficiency standards (5.7 L/100 Km)... unlike the domestic US versions when have relied on lax US governmental standards (8.7 L/100 Km) as an excuse to build cheaper, less technologically advanced machines. It's sad really - in a way the US's reliance on maintaining older tech standards through Government fiat (under the guise of the "free market") reminds me of how the British Empire stagnated from 1850 to 1914. Secure within the largest trading empire in history, it structured its trade to funnel through the island of Great Britain and protected its domestic firms against external competition and as a result they grew fat and weak and lazy. Outside the British Empire, the emerging powers of the United States and Germany were effectively locked out of this market. As a result, they had to compete by through lower prices and more advanced technology. By the time the UK realised what a situation it had got itself into, the UK balance of trade deficit amounted to 5% of its GDP (even with its economic embargoes), Germany had taken half of Europe and the United States was selling its superior products in every country in the world.

    --

    Da Blog
  42. One big toll booth by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    So the cars are stopped, almost as though they were in one big tool booth.

    Hire a few of the huge oversupply of men to become toll collectors, parachute them to various points along the road with supplies and plenty of ammo, inform the folks on the road that they can avoid a toll only if they get off the road, and then start randomly picking stopped vehicles, stopped for even a second, to toll. Soon enough the road would clear out. And just think of the money they could donate to the preservation of Tibetan culture! Oh, wait, they'd probably just use the money to widen the road.

    NEVER MIND...

  43. Bloody amateurs by taustin · · Score: 1

    Most of the freeways in southern California have had traffic jams that have lasted for 30 years, so far. That I know of. Possibly longer.

  44. Don't tell me... by Prostate+of+Grace · · Score: 1

    There's not a guy in Tiananmen Square standing in front of the line of cars, is there?

  45. The picture is not from China - Its Delhi, India by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Specificaly, Ashram Chowk. It sees long jams, lasting few hours when it rains, and slow moving traffic when it does not rain. A week ago, when heavy rains hit Delhi, this picture was flashed over the news channels(which do not have nothing much to report anyway).

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  46. tries to solve traffic problem by miiiiceeee · · Score: 1

    TunedIT and TomTom created a data mining competition to solve the traffic problem-> see:http://tunedit.org/challenge/IEEE-ICDM-2010

  47. Overpopulation... by Alcoholist · · Score: 1

    ...can be a real bitch, especially when everyone wants to drive a car.

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
  48. Watch your units by achurch · · Score: 1

    That's 62 miles, or 100km. I can't recall hearing about a 100km jam in the 11 years I've been here, though I'll grant you a few 50-60km jams pop up on the news most holiday seasons.

  49. Re:USian Cars Fail Chinese Fuel Efficiency Standar by DaCentaur · · Score: 1

    Well said!