Slashdot Mirror


UVB-76 Broadcasts New Voice Message

Doug52392 writes "Following days of increased activity, the Russian numbers station UVB-76 has sent out a new voice transmission. The transmission, sent out on August 23, 2010 at 9:35AM PST, recited the following in Russian: 'UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4' The station, believed to be a part of the former Soviet Union's dead man's switch system, has been continually broadcasting for over twenty years, and its purpose has never been fully explained."

68 of 560 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious by Walkingshark · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, dead switch is manned

    --
    The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    1. Re:Obvious by h00manist · · Score: 4, Funny

      It runs windows and has is giving a warning that the antivirus needs updating.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    2. Re:Obvious by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, joke is made fun of by YOU!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  2. unexplained?? by click2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its viral marketing for Lost II : Lost in Siberia

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    1. Re:unexplained?? by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know you're joking, but that would be awesome. Assuming they got writers that can write an ending.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:unexplained?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled terrible.

    3. Re:unexplained?? by glwtta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming they got writers that can write an ending.

      Or a middle...

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:unexplained?? by robot256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't they just stick to beginnings then? They could just have 10 different introductory episodes, each with a different cast and location, and not actually have any story at all.

    5. Re:unexplained?? by Jayemji · · Score: 4, Informative
  3. Thanks slashdot! by line-bundle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the whole world knows my combination.

    1. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4 - that sounds like the kind of combination an idiot would use on his luggage.

  4. Location by ryanleary · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't it be possible to triangulate the position based on signal strength from multiple points, and just locate the tower, break in and see what the hardware attached to the transmitter does?

    1. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its Russia. You can't just hike across it to wherever you want.

      It'd like a radio transmitter in northern Canada or Alaska, there aren't roads, not many airfields, its going to be out of helicopter range, the weather sucks and for added difficultly, there is an integrated air defense network.

      And bears. And wolves, alot of wolves and bears.

    2. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Location: The station's transmitter is located at Povarovo, Russia (56458N 37522E / 56.08278N 37.08944E / 56.08278; 37.08944), which is about halfway between Zelenograd and Solnechnogorsk and 40 kilometres (25 mi) northwest of Moscow, near the village of Lozhki.

    3. Re:Location by ksandom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The broadcast is not the bit of interest. It's the thing recieving it that's interesting.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    4. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it's 40 miles from Moscow its inside the Moscow Military District so it's undoubtably secure and monitored.

      So instead of weather, bears and wolves theres just going to be the Moscow detachments of Alpha Group, Vympel or more likely OMON.

    5. Re:Location by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard that Sarah Palin can pick this up quite easily from her home in Wasilla!

    6. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't dismiss battlebears so...recklessly.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMON troops on bears.

      Thats some 21st century bear cavalry right there.

    8. Re:Location by Snowblindeye · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google Satellite Picture of the site. Unfortunately it's darkened by the cloud, so its hard to see much. The Wikipedia Picture of the site is a little brighter.

    9. Re:Location by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read the Wikipedia article, they even show a picture of the transmitter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    10. Re:Location by lennier1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's Russia's first underground Walmart.
      The radio station on top is only a publicity stunt to increase tourism and screw with the heads at the CIA.

    11. Re:Location by vlueboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thanks. Apparently the Wiki picture was extracted from Google Earth's clock feature.

      2009 is the obscured picture you linked to
      2005 has white clouds badly obscuring half the area
      2004 is exactly what you linked to

      Maybe pay-for subscribers have newer imagery of the site and can repost. The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows. The long straight lines on the grass are just ground partitions of some sort and are unlikely to be parallel to the antenna's clock-like moving shadow exactly as the imaging satellite passed by. If you're in doubt, notice even gravestone cross's shadows are easily picked up from satellites. Blurring are would not be different between the very crisp imagery for coordinates in question (aside from the stupid clouds!) and the Woodlawn Cemetery in my link.

      Another poster did give out a link with ground pictures of the supposed site, though it's all in russian and has a bunch random nature pictures. For the lazy, the map DOES shut up anyone believing this is a remote area --there's several roads and towns near the forest for those coordinates. Then, again, I'm not sure how /. could validate b>anyone's coordinates or "translations" of these Russian-language sources... ;-)

    12. Re:Location by klossner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, the Scandinavian countries have exactly that tradition. Read about it here.

    13. Re:Location by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      what we need is to stop tracking *transmitters* and start tracking *receivers*.

      sort of like how in BASIC you can convert your code from using GOTO style to using COMEFROM style branching. sort of like that. employ logic like that and you can reverse bias the trackers to tune in on the receivers, instead.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:Location by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Informative

      ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

      (morbo is very, very displeased by this lameness filter)

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re:Location by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Things at that zoom level are NOT from satellites. They're from aircraft areal photos. These photos only exist where there is an interesting market where someone can sell Google (or bing, or whoever) a license to show them.

    16. Re:Location by macshit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe pay-for subscribers have newer imagery of the site and can repost. The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows. The long straight lines on the grass are just ground partitions of some sort and are unlikely to be parallel to the antenna's clock-like moving shadow exactly as the imaging satellite passed by. If you're in doubt, notice even gravestone cross's shadows are easily picked up from satellites

      That gravestone is probably a massive solid hunk of stone, and has a solid continuous shadow.

      An antenna, on the other hand, is typically constructed as a truss or mesh of rather thin metal pieces, perhaps supported by guy-wires -- it's mostly air, and the shadow, accordingly, will be composed of very thin lines widely separated by areas of no shadow. That may well not be noticeable from a satellite.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    17. Re:Location by ball-lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

      But why would they build a doomsday machine... and not tell anybody?

    18. Re:Location by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure it does! Just make time run backward and we can see all the little radio-photons running toward the transmitter! Or better yet, try and detect the subtle field distortions caused by antennas absorbing radio frequency energy.

      Okay Brain! But umm...where are we going to find Superman at this time of night?

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    19. Re:Location by GNious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cant decide whether Hollywood reading /. would be a good thing or a bad thing..

    20. Re:Location by richlv · · Score: 4, Interesting

      phew, that's nothing. try http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=421694 ;)

      obscured area in _all_ sattellite images, american, russian, whatever.

      technical glitch, distraction or something important ? slashdot to the rescue ! (well, maybe. judging by some sources of information even the locals have no idea what's there)

      --
      Rich
    21. Re:Location by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows."

      Don't zoom in, zoom out.

      First thing I noticed is that the building is definitely the highest structure in the shot (Wikipedia image). Most objects have no shadow in this shot, so it must be mid-day. Judging by the size of the shadow of the main building, it is probably 3-5 stories tall. I am not sure of the size of the antenna used for this frequency, but it could be in the building if it is small enough...but I doubt this is the case.

      Zoom out further.

      Notice the disturbed soil in a near perfect square surrounding the base? See the "stepped", grassy area along the lower side of the square? Those stepped areas indicate a rise in elevation, terraced to prevent erosion (they are also inadvertently created by cattle grazing on slopes). If you look closely, you will see similar indications all the way around this square. What appears, at first glance, to be cleared areas are actually slopes--The base is underground, or rather it was built, then buried, then camouflaged.

      You might have also noticed that there are NO ground vehicles parked anywhere in sight. My guess is that all vehicles simply drive into the main building and are either parked inside it, or elevatored underground to hide how many people are (or, are not) actually using the facility.

      We Yanks have done the same, but on a grand scale.

      http://www.taphilo.com/history/WWII/USAAF/Boeing/index.shtml (Interesting photos of American camouflage efforts)

      What I find really interesting is the sheer number of OLD roads that seem to radiate outwards from this site. The Google image shows them clearly, as well as a nearby railhead. Those access roads are old and over-grown, some very much so. In short, people have been coming and going, from all directions, to this location for some time. What was here before the transmitter started up, to merit this much access?

    22. Re:Location by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, COMEFROM is easy.

      Computed COMEFROM (and conditional COMEFROM in general), now theye are powerful programming constructs.

      I = I + 10
      20 CONTINUE
      ...
          IF (I.GT.30) COMEFROM 20
      ...

      (Question? Is COMEFROM 20 executed before or after the instruction labeled 20? Did I need the CONTINUE? Would any qualified NARTROF programmers care to comment?)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  5. It is well known where it is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing is, "where it is," is in Russia. They might object to the US breaking in, rather violently in fact.

    1. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Russian government almost certainly knows exactly what this is, they're just not generally in the habit of sharing their military secrets.

    2. Re:It is well known where it is by mbone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Russia owns it, Russia operates it, and Russia has a lot of men with guns who will kill you if you get too inquisitive about it.

    3. Re:It is well known where it is by golden+age+villain · · Score: 3, Informative

      This thing seems to be in the middle of a military base and is operated by a human through an open microphone, not by a machine. So it means that the current government knows about it and keeps using it for the same or other purpose for which it was designed.

    4. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're 0 for 1 there. Nobody gives a crap about her any more.

      Naked pics or she never existed!

    5. Re:It is well known where it is by igny · · Score: 3, Funny

      Russia owns it, Russia operates it, and Russia has a lot of men with guns who will kill you if you get too inquisitive about it.

      May be they are expecting inquisition.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:It is well known where it is by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      and keeps using it for the same or other purpose for which it was designed.

      Consider this: if you want to hide something, hide it in plain view.

      But I can imagine this is also a great inside joke, imagine this:

      Young eager cadet: "Sergei, what is this?"
      "Our top of the line distraction and nuclear defence device!"
      "How does it work?"
      "We keep on broadcasting this pendula going over this magnetic field"
      "Why?"
      "Oh, you see... The CIA is listening since 1982 and can imagine it's a nuclear reaction device or anything they can come up with. We use it joke around since the signal can be picked up everywhere in Russia."
      "How?"
      "Do you see this microphone?"
      "Yes..."
      "Say, I met this girl Naimina and I want to share story and her number and zipcode with my comrades..."
      reaches for microphone: "UVB-76, UVB-76 -- 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 -- 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4"

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  6. Have to dial it in by sv_libertarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I've heard this station's buzzing a few times, while drifting around on my HF transceiver. Have to note the frequency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76 and poke around again for grins.

  7. Previous Story by Snowblindeye · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, it hasn't really been broadcasting continuously, as it went suddenly offline two months ago. This was previously discussed on slashdot at the time. It *had* been broadcasting continuously for 20 years until then, however.

    1. Re:Previous Story by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Funny

      What makes you think the apparent silence was not just a long string of Null characters being broadcast ?

      --
      Nullius in verba
  8. Unexplained? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    has been continually broadcasting for over twenty years, and its purpose has never been fully explained.

    Nobody can explain Fox News either.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Unexplained? by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought [Fox News] was there to counterbalance NPR.

      Excactly. Disinformation counterbalances information.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  9. Unexplained broadcasts by Stratoukos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And for the conspiracy nuts out there, here are 4 more unexplained broadcasts.

    --
    It may be 7 digits, but at least it's a semiprime
  10. I actually monitor this station on occasion. by hkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have it on right now in the background. There used to be an alternating tone at the top of the hour that kicked in suddenly and always gave me the shivers, but it stopped doing that a few years ago. Sometimes I tune in late at night, since the monotone drone of the buzzer can get pretty psychedelic. Good for coding. Never been lucky enough to catch a voice broadcast, though I did hear some crosstalk once. I even started work on a C daemon to autocorrelate the signal and auto-record any voice transmissions, but that got put on hold.
    Pictures of the transmission site: http://alex-odn.livejournal.com/12148.html

  11. Message Recieved by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The message was received by UB-40, and they proceeded to drink red red wine.

  12. Google map it by h00manist · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    1. Re:Google map it by dave420 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, that's the purpose of "numbers stations" in general - the sending of messages to operatives in the field via off-the-shelf technology that any civilian might own. Not much is known about the stations, but I read about some lady in East Germany (before the fall of the wall, obviously) who used a radio to receive messages from the West German Intelligence (BND) telling her where to go to get out of the East and into the West. That's the only account I've ever read of someone actually telling their story of using a numbers station. The stations, from analysis of the traffic, serve multiple operatives. Opening up a new station for each operative would be a bit costly :) These stations can make broadcasts to all agents (as in the case of the partially-decrypted Cuban numbers station, that congratulated all their female operatives on international woman's day), or to specific agents. They use one-time pads, so unless someone gets a hold of the pad (or they re-use one), there is absolutely no way to crack the broadcasts. The buzzer, however, is a different kind of station, with a different mission.

  13. unruskie(%s) yields by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    unruskie("UVB-76, UVB-76 -- 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 -- 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4'") ends up with this cryptic message:

    lp0 on fire. call nikolai, anna or ivan; but ivan's drunk, call michail instead

    rather a specific message but that's what the unruskie() filter says.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  14. Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by el_tedward · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the ideas of what the hell this thing is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76:
    "UVB-76 is widely believed to be used to transmit encoded messages to spies, as is generally assumed for the many numbers stations that populate shortwave frequencies. Transmitter sites for some numbers stations have been triangulated to military and/or intelligence installations in several countries,[citation needed] although no nation's government will confirm or deny the existence of the stations or their purpose."

    Could this be related to the recent case of the 10 (with one on the run, right?) kinda-sorta-russian-spies news fest? It could be the Russians talking to other operatives they have lurking about.

    Or maybe It's just some Russian dudes spending government money to boost their shares in tin & aluminum foil.

  15. Re:Scary thought by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Same thing that happened when MySpace stopped being cool.

    Rupert Murdoch will buy it.

  16. Re:hrm... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm rather surprised that the general public is both unaware and unconcerned that the entire Russian atomic arsenal is armed, pointed at us and the trigger autonomous... it will trigger based on a set of circumstances unknown to us that were set up 50 years ago.

    I presume you're talking about "Perimeter". While it is supposedly capable of operating in autonomous mode, it's not the normal mode of operation. It's only supposed to be turned on when the danger of a sudden nuclear strike is very likely, so as to ensure a retaliatory strike even in the face of the most fast and overwhelming incoming attack. Assuming it still exists, it has most likely never been on since the dissolution of the USSR.

    Worth noting that all of this is mostly conjecture. Aside from the fact that something along these lines exists, there's very little reliable data on what the system even is in practice. Of course, that's what makes it ripe for conspiracy theories.

  17. Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much does a shortwave transmitter cost?? I want to rickroll this frequency!

  18. It says... by fishthegeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    BESURETODRINKYOUROVALTINE

    --
    load "$",8,1
  19. Just want to point out by sea4ever · · Score: 5, Informative

    On ships and so on, they use names and stuff like that to encode words, so that when they speak them out over the radio there's less chance of being misheard. I don't know what that system is called but perhaps somebody else does. Sorry if I explained that badly.
    Anyway, the message:
    "UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4'"
    'naimina' is equivalent to Nikolai Anna Ivan Michael Ivan Nikolai Anna
    Also, notice that the '74 14 35 74' is the same as '7 4 1 4 3 5 7 4'. The second half is just to make sure the other person got the message OK, I suppose. That means the total message is just the first part, which is only:
    "93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74"
    That's way too short to encode very much more than anything informational. I'll bet it just says "Hey guys, happy birthday" or something.

    1. Re:Just want to point out by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 4, Informative

      On ships and so on, they use names and stuff like that to encode words, so that when they speak them out over the radio there's less chance of being misheard. I don't know what that system is called but perhaps somebody else does. Sorry if I explained that badly.

      While there are several versions throughout the history of radio, the most common phonetic/spelling alphabet these days is the NATO phonetic alphabet:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICAO_spelling_alphabet

      We still use it in the military for standardized communications. For more specialized applications, you might hear the letter 'A' as 'acer' or 'T' as 'talon' to let the listener know that you are using a specific identifier (bay A, truck T, etc.) instead of spelling a word.

      The transmission seems to follow the standard russian spelling template. Make of that what you will; I just thought I'd get you started.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_spelling_alphabet

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  20. Sure they can. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody can explain Fox News either.

    Sure they can.

      - The cultural/political/ideological orientation of much of the population of the United States falls into one of two major groupings. (They tend to be called things like "liberal" and "conservative", "left" and "right", or other pairs of names. But they're each coalitions of many subgroups bound by rough agreement on a few major points.)
      - The broadcast news media became sufficiently (and visibly) biased in its programming that the members of one of the groupings felt that they were not being served by it. This created a market opportunity. (This was similar to the one that spawned CNN, when mainstream news migrated from news reportage to infotainment-product generation.)
      - Fox News marketed itself as providing "fair and balanced" coverage - half from the viewpoint of each of the two groupings. This made them the only show in town for the one that felt underserved. Thus they grabbed the eyballs of about half the population's newswatchers to sell to their advertisers.
      - This worked until about the 2008 campaign, when it became clear that Fox News was serving only one (Neocon) of the four-or-so major and several minor factions within the underserved group. This left several large (and moneyed) factions feeling underserved again and created another marketing opportunity.
      - Fox News is going after the biggest coalition of the remaining factions (libertarians + paleoconservatives + {"Tea Party" minus neocons}) with new shows on their "Fox Financial Network" feed.

    TV news is easy to understand once you get that it has two purposes:
      1) Making money by selling eyeball time to advertisers.
      2) Exercising political power by inserting itself between the people in office and the rest of the world and creating a false image of the constituents' opinions and world events for the office-holders.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  21. Lat/Long by trinaryai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone else may have caught this and it got buried in the deeper replies, but I find the 4 2-digit numbers to be very interesting. 74.14E 35.74N is right in the mountains of Pakistan controlled Kashmir. The second part of the message with the names is simply a phonetic spelling of the first part of the message. Naimina has several possible references, #1 on my list of likelihoods would refer to the owner of a website design company of that name targeting the Turkish language. No guess what 93 882 is - probably a predetermined instruction code undecipherable outside the network.

    1. Re:Lat/Long by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More Lat/Long stuff: 74.14W 35.74N is right off the coast of North Carolina & Southern Virginia. 74.14W 35.74S is right off the coast of Chile. 74.14E 35.74S is in the middle of nowhere, with Madagascar.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  22. old /. story about numbers stations. by steak · · Score: 3, Informative

    following my nose around wikipedia I found a link to this /. article from 11 years ago.

    http://slashdot.org/it/99/09/16/0055245.shtml

  23. Just a guess, It's a salt. by N1tr0u5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can pick this thing up from anywhere with the right equipment, right?

  24. "Dead man's kill switch" by ischorr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Really?

    Although there are many conspiracy theorists out there, I'd say most people who have done basic research on "The Buzzer" have come to agree that it is a station used for Ionosphere research. Some details:

    - Its frequency (4.625Mhz) is mentioned specifically in several scientific papers. One paper discusses a technique for ionosphere research using doppler shift measurements reflected from a high-frequency radio wave. (http://elpub.wdcb.ru/journals/rjes/v10/2007ES000227/2.shtml)
    - This paper refers to the signal as coming from a "stable basic generator", sending a carrier wave from a standard radio transmitter.
    - Several (supposed) radio experts have said that the signal being sent is the kind that would make sense for this kind of research - the tone sent at a fixed strength and amplitude/pitch, with a regular cutoff and regular repeat would be useful to measure doppler shift and falloff at the edge of the signal.
    - The paper above was authored (partially) by "S V Anisimov".
    - Sergei V Anisimov is the senior director of the "Borok Geophysical Observatory" (http://wwwbrk.adm.yar.ru/main_e.html), which does, among other things, Ionosphere research.
    - Borok Geophysical Observatory is based not tremendously far from the CONFIRMED location of the UVB-76 transmitter. It is easy to imagine that they could have an agreement with the owners of this transmitter (the russian government?) or own it themselves, and be using it for this research.

    Conspiracy nuts will say that this is just a cover story.

    It doesn't explain why the voice messages occur occasionally (some have theorized that having the random tones of a human voice can be used for other doppler measurements). And even if this research is occurring, it doesn't mean that this transmitter isn't used for other purposes as well. But nobody seems to mention any of this. The dead man's switch theory of world destruction is way more exciting, I guess.

    1. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by leathered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree.. Ionospheric research is the most likely explanation. But..

      UVB-76 has been broadcasting for 28 years. That's one hell of a long time to do research. It's also survived the collapse of the Soviet Union, a time of great economic turmoil where you'd expect a project like this to be first for the axe. A transmitter like that is not cheap to run or maintain.
      The transmitter is located in the military district of Moscow.
      There are two other sites in Russia that are purpose built for Ionosphere research that operate on much higher power, if they have such facilities then why the need for UVB-76?

      Still lots of food for thought..

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
  25. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by Bronster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Woah there. Salt. One time pad. It's like you grabbed some random crypto sounding words and slung them together.

  26. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by marqs · · Score: 3, Informative