Slashdot Mirror


Northrop Grumman Says 'I'm Sorry' For Virginia IT Outage

Lucas123 writes "After a storage area network in a data center run by Northrop Grumman went down last week, crippling 26 state agencies' websites — some for more than a week — Northrop Grumman has now apologized to Virginia, saying it will learn from its mistakes in order to recover systems faster in the future. Northrop's $2.6 billion service contract with Virginia's government has come under harsh criticism in the past for service outages, along with project delays and cost overruns."

168 comments

  1. Apt Futurama quote by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hermes: What do we do when we break somebody's window?
    Dwight: Pay for it?
    Hermes: Heavens, no! We apologize! With nice, cheap words.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Apt Futurama quote by operagost · · Score: 1

      Should VA sue Northrop Grumman, then? Or simply hold them to their promise of improving their infrastructure and response (both of these cost money)?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Apt Futurama quote by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Should VA sue Northrop Grumman, then?

      VA shouldn't have to sue NG. NG should do the right thing. It won't, of course.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Paspanique · · Score: 1

      The only "Do the right thing" share holders know is making the profit and lower the cost. If you can avoid settling stuff like that, do it. Think BP will pay a dime if it sees it can avoid it?

      --
      I don't have an intelligent phone, so I need to be.
    4. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think BP will pay a dime if it sees it can avoid it?

      Yes - and they already have. Under law when it happened they are only liable for 75m they have already paid out a hell of a lot more than than that.

      Why? because it would cost them more not too. If BP ran with the law at the time and said too bad soo sorry we are only liable for 75m, the media and the politicians would have gone ramped with it in their own name (elect/pay me i'll fight the evil doers BP for you).. instead BP did the correct thing and said out front before ANYONE mentioned making them pay - that they would pay for it. That they would foot the bill, and so far they have.

      Just because they can get out of paying for something doesn't make it wise to do it.. as for NG.. i doubt the VA contract is a large portion of the biz and isn't a core piece - so yea.. they are going to use cheap words.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      instead BP did the correct thing and said out front before ANYONE mentioned making them pay - that they would pay for it. That they would foot the bill, and so far they have.

      Except now the line is, "Approve permits for our off-shore drilling, or we won't pay."

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Amouth · · Score: 1

      and where have they been correctly quoted saying this?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, they have talked about doing the right thing, but we will see if there is any follow through. Last I heard they were spending about half thier daily PROFIT on clean up expenses, they had not even gone into the red to 'make it right'. Lets just say I doubt thier dedication.

    8. Re:Apt Futurama quote by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Think BP will pay a dime if it sees it can avoid it?

      Why? because it would cost them more not too. If BP ran with the law at the time and said too bad soo sorry we are only liable for 75m, the media and the politicians would have gone ramped with it in their own name (elect/pay me i'll fight the evil doers BP for you).. instead BP did the correct thing and said out front before ANYONE mentioned making them pay - that they would pay for it. That they would foot the bill, and so far they have.

      In other words.... They couldn't avoid it! It was pretty obvious that if BP had stuck to the $75m thing, the law would have been changed. Too much political capital at stake. So, they did the intelligent thing and made it look like they were doing it because they wanted to do the right thing. You can bet your ass if they had been able to sweep it under the rug, they would have.

    9. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      The New York Times.

      Here's the quote:

      But as state and federal officials, individuals and businesses continue to seek additional funds beyond the minimum fines and compensation that BP must pay under the law, the company has signaled its reluctance to cooperate unless it can continue to operate in the Gulf of Mexico. The gulf accounts for 11 percent of its global production.

      "If we are unable to keep those fields going, that is going to have a substantial impact on our cash flow," said David Nagel, BP's executive vice president for BP America, in an interview. That, he added, "makes it harder for us to fund things, fund these programs."

      Do you understand what Nagel's saying there?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:Apt Futurama quote by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      It is in the contract between a BP subsidiary (gulf deepwell exploration only is what this subsidiary does) and the obama administration. Basically, only that subsidiary agrees to pay anything, and they are solely deep wells. So, if no more deep well exploration is going on, they "don't know" if they will be able to pay. I wish I had sources on this, but I heard it on the radio, so I'm not 100% on it, perhaps someone else can fill in the blanks.

    11. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Amouth · · Score: 0, Troll

      i'd like to see the whole transcript to be honest - that looks like a little spin to me.

      the first quote is statement of fact - the second is obviously in relation - but to what extent?

      also note that keeping fields going doesn't exactly translate to drill more..

      for you to take that and translate it to

      "Approve permits for our off-shore drilling, or we won't pay."

      is what i call over spin/fear mongering.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    12. Re:Apt Futurama quote by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Under law when it happened they are only liable for 75m they have already paid out a hell of a lot more than than that.

      If there was "negligence" then there was no cap on the damages. Given what was available initially and what has come out since, there seems to be little doubt to those that matter that the "negligence" standard was met and the $75 million cap would not apply.

      And even if it did, that's a cap on punitive, not actual damages. As such, they could be sued for trillions, and setting up an immediate fund for the civil issues has no impact on the small part that the $75 million would cover, if it applies (which it apparently doesn't).

      BP did the correct thing and said out front before ANYONE mentioned making them pay - that they would pay for it.

      That's why it took a meeting with the President before they actually did anything other than cheap words? Because they did it out of the goodness of their hearts? Or were they asked before they did it? I can't imaging that there'd be a meeting with such an outcome with nothing being mentioned about making them pay. Oh, and "ANYONE" is simply false, as the media was alreaty mentioning it before they announced anything. So you seem to be wrong on every single point you mention. In a rare ad hominem (just calling someone an ass isn't an ad hominem, it's an insult, you have to actually insult them and at least imply that because of the trait insulted that other things they say should be ignored), I'll state that anyone that can't get a single fact right on BP shouldn't be listened to on anything else liability related.

      Just because they can get out of paying for something doesn't make it wise to do it.. as for NG.. i doubt the VA contract is a large portion of the biz and isn't a core piece - so yea.. they are going to use cheap words.

      They'll use cheap words, but not for the reason you mention. They are a professional government contractor. They know the government rewards incompetence. They'll use this as an excuse to increase rates next time (see, you only gave us 2.4 billion, and it wasn't enough). The professional contractors underperform almost every time. The professional contractors are over budget almost every time. And, as a result, they get paid more for the overruns and get more contracts to fix what wasn't right the first time. But, of course, the problem was predicted quite clearly by Eisenhower. NG is a product of the military industrial complex. But having a problem laid out before us clearly by a president doesn't seem to affect anyone. Washington stated in his farewell address that parties would harm the country, and look where they are taking us now...

    13. Re:Apt Futurama quote by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's in the context of the fact that all of BP's wells need to undergo re-certification and re-permitting to continue operating in the gulf. This includes wells that are not yet operating. You were aware of this, right?

      Nagel is quite clearly correlating the re-cert process with funding the commitments BP as made.

      Either he's bluffing (quite possible) or he's making it clear that funding for those programs is contingent on re-cert.

      is what i call over spin/fear mongering.

      Why? Nagel is clearly insinuating that BP would discontinue payments on those programs if the wells are not re-certified. How is my restatement of his threat overblown? Just because he minces words means the threat is not there?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    14. Re:Apt Futurama quote by sjames · · Score: 1

      In other words, they couldn't avoid it.

      Not all consequences are law enforcement related.

      If we were all wondering "where did all that oil come from, anyone know?" You can bet BP wouldn't have fessed up.

    15. Re:Apt Futurama quote by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's quite possible to dismiss every "right thing" out there...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  2. Poor metropolitan area by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Maryland/VA/DC metro area is really starting to go down hill, from an infrastructure standpoint. Things are just falling apart around here...oh, and what's that? Instead of investing in fixing aging infrastructure, they instead are spending billions to build the ICC? Oh, and what's that? It's STILL going to be a toll road?

    I've lived in Montgomery County my whole life, but I'm quickly getting tired of this place -_-;;

    1. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      Another Montgomery County resident here, and I second this view. We've had an insane number of power outages, water main breaks, crippling snowstorms with unplowed roads, etc. in the last few years.

      I love where I live, though. Who needs electricity?

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    2. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What does the infrastructure of highways have to do with with the State Governments reliance on a single storage area network?

    3. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I used the ICC as an example because it's the biggest one...but there are HUGE problems with all aspects of infrastructure here, from electric to water and sewer, to traffic signals to just about anything else you can name.

      These systems being down caused widespread problems, including people being unable to use the DMV for driver's licence services. It's just one more ingredient in the shit sandwich, that's all.

    4. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Pojut · · Score: 1

      In addition to my other post, it's also relevant because the ICC is a multi-billion dollar highway project that is wholly unecessary. Those billions could be used in much better ways...like, for example, fixing/upgrading the IT infrastructure that is clearly breaking down rather than simply maintaining it.

    5. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Wiarumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://www.thesentinel.com/mont/Pepco-Investigation2010-08-12T10-54-42

      The governor of MD wrote a letter to Pepco regarding those power outages. As for the snowstorms - its because the DC area historically does not receive snowfall to justify a ROI on snowplows. Instead, they borrow them from the north. Its not like in PA, where if it blizzards overnight, the streets are clear by 6AM so the kids can go to school.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    6. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the power outages are caused by overhead (rather than underground) power lines that are severed when one of our many large, beautiful trees fall on them. However, I think that if you compare this area to others with similar climate/foliage, we still fall short. The large state roads around here were not plowed for DAYS following the Snowpocalypse this past winter. (And then when they were finally plowed, the plowing was done poorly and left many roads with huge ruts and sudden narrowings.) I've lived in this area for most of my life (since the 1960s), and it's worse now than it ever was before.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    7. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are both examples of infrastructure paid for by the government of Virginia which have gone downhill lately.

      See GP post for more info, and watch out for those infinite loops. ;)

    8. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://www.thesentinel.com/mont/Pepco-Investigation2010-08-12T10-54-42

      The governor of MD wrote a letter to Pepco regarding those power outages. As for the snowstorms - its because the DC area historically does not receive snowfall to justify a ROI on snowplows. Instead, they borrow them from the north. Its not like in PA, where if it blizzards overnight, the streets are clear by 6AM so the kids can go to school.

      And the plowing was also poorly prioritized and executed. I live in Alexandria. My residential street was clear to pavement with repeated passes of salt and sand, but Duke Street and Route 1 were an unplowed rutted mess. All because I have a member of the General Assembly living in my neighborhood (that's at least what I've been told by those in the know).

    9. Re:Poor metropolitan area by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      The ICC is in Maryland.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    10. Re:Poor metropolitan area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but worse yet is the handing out of services like candy. Look at the budget for Montgomery County Schools. All this money spent but quality is sliding.

    11. Re:Poor metropolitan area by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Carroll County, moved to Alexandria (VA) and realized things are never going to get better so I left to Arizona.
      Never felt better about life.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    12. Re:Poor metropolitan area by rokstar83 · · Score: 1

      I've lived in MoCo for my whole life (since the 1980s) and I don't remember ever having so many and such severe storms. Pepco's response to these types of events has always been awful its just that we've needed them more this year.

    13. Re:Poor metropolitan area by frost_knight · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Prince George's county Maryland and now live in Kent county Maryland on the Chesapeake Bay. The entire county has less that 20,000 people (the smallest population in the state) and it's almost all farmland and waterways. Yet Kent County had its roads cleared very quickly after the big snow this year and our power went out for maybe 2 hours. Kent county has the most efficient emergency crews I've ever seen and I'm willing to bet they only have a fraction of Montgomery County's budget.

      --
      It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law. --Hofstadter's Law
    14. Re:Poor metropolitan area by astar · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but you may be parochial.

      I just heard today about a town who put the entire fire department on half-time and at minimum wage. Infrastructure has been a know problem for decades and more recently even a matter of considerable public concern, as when an interstate bridge collapsed a few years back. But big cuts in public safety are new. And there is a nice pattern. The cuts are not something that make the mass media. but I saw a long summary compiled from local media last month, so I figure this is brand new.

      Here is a quote I read yesterday in some semi-scholarly book that might be relevant. It is multiple thousands of years old and I am not smart enough to make a decent historical comparison, but it seems relevant.

      Such is the senility of the world: atheism, dishonor, and the disregard of noble words. hmm, asclepius

      Hah, if you are into desert tribal religions. I imagine you should get a peculiar satisfaction in our present situation. On the other hand, if you are not into eschatons, read not "world", but "international financial system". Or, "your future".

    15. Re:Poor metropolitan area by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      I'd be a hell of a lot more concerned with your state's taxation, police run amok, and unionization of the public servants. MD is a joke.

    16. Re:Poor metropolitan area by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to find capable individuals willing to run into burning building to save strangers on half time for minimum wage? That's the most asinine thing I've ever heard. better to be a volunteer than a sucker.

    17. Re:Poor metropolitan area by astar · · Score: 1

      you are of course right. But be a little more realistic. With talking heads saying real unemployment is 22% and a better number being 30%, then consider all the really good reasons you can up with for cutting police resources :-) I am old enough to remember lots of federal troops and tanks in the street. And back in last crash, I believe MacAuthur was shooting people in the capital mall. So, before my time, but I googled a bit with "macauthur general riot suppression". I did not quite see "shooting".

      So sure, fire chiefs are talking about big chunks of cities "accidentally" burning down as a result of cutbacks. But back in the day, we had whole blocks going up and the fires were not "accidental".

      Welcome to early 21st century financial capitalism. In a few years, we may be happy to manage to have feudal economic relationships. But maybe that is the idea.

    18. Re:Poor metropolitan area by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, here in New York (state) we kinda laugh at the mid-south states those close over a couple inches. granted, her, we seem to be too slow to close stuff.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  3. An apology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no, their contract specifies that they get paid one million dollars for each time they say they are sorry!

  4. State governments not as forgiving as the DoD? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Pretty weak apology if you ask me. I guess these military contractors are used to the "boys will be boys" pat on the hand they get from the Department of Defense when they screw up there.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:State governments not as forgiving as the DoD? by plcurechax · · Score: 1

      Some (many?) of DoD projects are "high-risk" of failure. They are typically want to push the envelope and be early adopters of technology before their enemy does.

      I don't know how they run their IS/IM side of the house (payroll, HR, administrative IT).

      Plus NGC and co know DoD has very few obligations to make their budget (per project) overruns public, with the easily cited "national security" concerns.

  5. My Project by WED+Fan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a project in a separate NG hosted dataspace, in Virginia. They are killing us with incompetence and their sub contractors are worse then they are. We are still trying to get things certified and they won't provide us information about their hosting. We think they have us on virtual servers that belong to another project, and the reason they don't want to tell us anything is that it would reveal they are in breach, since we are paying for dedicated servers.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:My Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like GoDaddy.

    2. Re:My Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're giving NG way too much credit there. I doubt they're capable, institutionally, of that sort of duplicity; they have been in almost every way, at the corporate and division level, absolutely incompetent.

    3. Re:My Project by snspdaarf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do some work with NG sub contractors. One is a delight to work with. Working with the other is like staring at the sun through binoculars. People don't answer email, sometimes because they are lazy, sometimes because they quit. When an answer does come in, it is worse than none at all. It's like the worst troll postings on slashdot, full of errors, run-on sentences that confuse more than clarify, and off topic. Absolute nightmare.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    4. Re:My Project by Cylix · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unless they have gone to some very lengthy steps to hide this you can probably discover the information on your own.

      http://www.dmo.ca/blog/detecting-virtualization-on-linux/

      This page details steps for many different types of virtualization environments. Though I think it would be just as fast to sort through the output of dmidecode and look for an identification in the mess.

      I'm afraid this is rather linux centric, but even so similar data sets can be collected on windows.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    5. Re:My Project by Manip · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy sell both. Are you sure you know what you're paying for?

    6. Re:My Project by Monchanger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As much as Northrup is being bashed here, I don't think this problem is specific to NG, but common to many large contractors and their subs.

      In the few times I've worked with subcontractors doing IT for the government I've been unimpressed. Even being one step away from the prime contract seems to allow for many problems, both technical and managerial. Requirements and deadlines aren't met, and they pull the BP-Halliburton-Transocean trick of avoiding responsibility by blaming each other (as well as everyone's favorite scapegoat: the government). Trying to get a subcontractor to build things they way they were supposed to will often require waiting for the next spiral, which means going way over budget.

      I understand the difficulty with pushing too hard, punishing contractors who screw up and scaring them away from government work, but it seems we've gone too far in accepting very expensive third-rate work. As much as the public likes to say government can't do anything right, how much worse off would we be than $2.4B in the hole with nothing to show for it but a mediocre datacenter run by amateurs? I don't think I'm asking for much, I haven't touched on the very messy political poisoning of contracting.

    7. Re:My Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... similar data sets can be collected on windows.

      Device Manager > Display adapters. Look for "VMware SVGA II".

      *running away from flying tomatoes*

    8. Re:My Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't agree more. NG seems willfully incompetent because they make more money with their cost plus contracts that way. The more time they take, and the more inefficient resources they throw at the problem, the more they get paid. I've worked for the top three defense contractors and NG takes the cake for this kind of behavior. I heard more employees there use the phrase "I'm not going to jail for doing this", or "one more time and I'm going to call the Defense Hotline". While the people of NG are some of the hardest working, honest and dedicated people I've ever met, the (mis)management at NG takes the cake for sheer incompetence, as well as overworking and underpaying their employees.

    9. Re:My Project by guruevi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of months ago there was a declassified document (either on /. or Wikileaks) that was basically a CIA/War Department handbook for (civilian) saboteurs against an oppressive regime. If you read this, you can see a lot of the practices that are recommended to be used against the 'enemy' are exactly the same as those contractors use. The goal is to have the enemy (or the company you're contracted to) spend as much money as possible on lost time and resources. The only difference is the people/group that profits from it.

      I've been a contractor before for some of those contracting companies - they basically try to keep you as long as possible in a position even if it's totally unnecessary since they get paid ~80%-120% of your (before-tax) wages.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:My Project by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      It will tell we are virtualized, but it won't tell us if they are putting other systems on our dedicated systems, or if we are on someone elses.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    11. Re:My Project by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Try to use up all the IO, bonnie++ is good for that, to what you assume are local discs.

    12. Re:My Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I *was* a NG subcontractor, doing sysadmin work in a datacenter in a different state. Oh, the stories I could tell. More than once, as a new project was in the bidding stage, I would point out serious, game-stopping flaws in the proposal. The response was inevitably along the lines of "Fixing that would require us to raise our bid, and we don't have any exposure this way because we can blame the agency for a flawed proposal. Then they would win the bid, a bunch of equipment would get dumped on the floor, then sit idle for a few months as everyone tried to figure out how to get around a problem that should have been dealt with up front. Coming from the private sector, where satisfying the customer with a working solution was *the* criterion for success, this made my skin crawl. Since I wouldn't play ball, and was always completely candid with my customers about all the shenanigans, guess who's contract wasn't renewed :). Think NG is being unfairly singled out? The very first problem I had to deal with was frequent network outages. Turns out their resident network guy was making "10-base-T" cables with flat (untwisted) cables. I actually had to explain why this was a bad idea, and it took a good while to convince him. (posting AC for obvious reasons).

    13. Re:My Project by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Hammer it!

      Bonnie is good for a straight disk measurement, but depending on the options set it may not be too useful. Depending on the configuration you may be able to burst large quantities over any thresholds.

      Really, a few baselines need to be taken and compared against the cluster.

      I would perform a few isolated IOZone and Orion benchmarks to set the baseline. Once this completed a parallel initiated test of all hosts will determine which units may be shared.

      Now, if all the hardware is the same it should look relatively similar. However, if you are sharing even amongst yourselves the results from the baseline values will be quite different.

      There are similar tests out there that can be had to evaluate the "noisy neighbor" in virtual environments. Essentially, applications which look for the highest yield hosts in virtual farms. Such methods are possible when overcommitment or bursting is possible. These same tests can be used to determine if you are sharing resources.

      There are a whole slew of options to consider when inking the contract for these things. What a good deal of people fail to do is secure numbers for things such as processing capability, IOPS and even disk response times. A bare metal hard number is not necessary, but it should be something that the applications are comfortable running at. ie your provider may offer a large volume of storage, but this could be useless if the access times are greater then 30ms.

      There are still more things to consider or details to examine to sleuth your way to a solution. However, it generally begins with best practices that should have been followed when the farm was established.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  6. To be fair... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be fair, there is no evidence that Northrop is doing worse than anyone else would have done. We are talking about an enormously complex IT infrastructure here (or so I assume, since it is a government network), and this is not exactly a uniquely bad failure. A week may seem extreme, but I have seen smaller scale systems go down for that long.

    I am not an apologist for Northrop, I am just saying that this is not exactly one-of-a-kind incompetence.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:To be fair... by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meanwhile, the last week has marked the first time where there was really a valid excuse for apparently unmoving lines at Virginia DMV branches... glad I don't have to get my license renewed until 2017. They should be back up by then.

    2. Re:To be fair... by Mekkah · · Score: 1

      Thank you for inserting logic. I used to work for NG, and I am certainly not defending them, but lets not just brand them as bad because of the size of their.. contract. We all know morons who work for every company..

      --
      ~Mekkah
    3. Re:To be fair... by rotide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frankly, I've been witness to whole Enterprise datacenters going offline and then being brought up system by system in less than a week (candy red button). A week to fix a SAN issue? really? Why not classify it as a Sev0 (public exposure) (probably a somewhat unique code to the company I work for) and get the vendors in THAT DAY to fix it?

    4. Re:To be fair... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is there is more then one complain against the company.

      Still, 2.6 billion I could build way past four nines of availability.

      I currently maintain better availability on a budget that is way smaller and the equipment would not be considered inexpensive. In fact, a failure on that scale would blow any availability numbers I have out of the water for years. Short of data corruption that works its way into the system a single SAN failure should not halt operations for a week.

      Now, instead of using said dollars to build out proper infrastructure and relying on what I like to call "hope." Well, then these problems will eventually crop up because equipment does fail.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    5. Re:To be fair... by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why you don't try to implement this broad an IT contract. Was a damnfool idea at the start.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    6. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, there is no evidence that Northrop is doing worse than anyone else would have done.

      Ahh, a variant of the conservative's favorite excuse of "But Bill Clinton did it too!" or the liberal's "But Dubya did it too!!". Sorry, but incompetence of this scale is bad no matter how bad everyone else may be at the same time.

    7. Re:To be fair... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? This is hardly a great track record:

      During the first six months of 2009, Virginia's Department of Transportation (VDOT) experienced 101 significant IT outages totaling 4,677 hours: an average of more than 46 hours per outage. One outage, the Times-Dispatch said, took 360 hours to correct. The state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has experienced over the course of 5 weeks this autumn some 12 outages that put individual DMV offices out of business for a total of more than 100 hours the paper says.

      From here. I'm sorry, but there is no excuse for that.

    8. Re:To be fair... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I've been witness to whole Enterprise datacenters going offline and then being brought up system by system in less than a week (candy red button). A week to fix a SAN issue? really? Why not classify it as a Sev0 (public exposure) (probably a somewhat unique code to the company I work for) and get the vendors in THAT DAY to fix it?

      Depends on how much storage was in the SAN and the nature of the failure. If it was as easy as replacing a memory card then your point it completely valid. If, however, there was some data corruption then there might have been terabytes of data that needed to be verified and recovered. The article states that 26 state agencies were affected, "some for more than a week" which implies a variable amount of time. Without having more detail, it could have been that some were back up and running the same day but others had to wait for data recovery to occur.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:To be fair... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there is no evidence that Northrop is doing worse than anyone else would have done.

      They are doing significantly worse than the state's internal people before NG took over. And at a much higher price. There were lotsof other inexcusable outages and failures before this one.

      The worst part is that even knowing what a terrible deal VA was getting from NG, the governor decided to extend the contract for another 3 years and allow NG to increase their fees. If these guys had been working for a private company, they would have been thrown out long ago, and any executive suggesting they should get an extension and a pay increase would have been quickly dismissed by the board.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    10. Re:To be fair... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      But...but...smaller government!!! Private industry is always better and more efficient than the government. That is, except for the all cases like this where they really aren't.

    11. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: private sector good, public sector bad... private sector good, public sector bad... private sector...

      Bahhh!

    12. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair...

      You must be new here.

    13. Re:To be fair... by sjames · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that there are many thousands of mom'n'pop IT shops that do much better than that on a shoestring budget (when scaled proportionally) that would really love to get even part of a contract like that but never will because they always go to the behemoths filled with fail like NG.

  7. IT Bubble Syndrome by darien.train · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "old business man discovering the internet" IT bubble culture is still alive and well in the defense industry. They have such a bad track record with networking technology it borders on scary. Transformation comes to mind quickly and they keep repeating the same mistakes.

    --
    I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    1. Re:IT Bubble Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem with DI contractors is that the government rewards good sales teams more than good engineering teams. It means that a disproportionate amount of overhead must be factored in to a winning bid, and since winning bids are often on the lower cost side, it means the engineering teams are always underfunded for the project.

    2. Re:IT Bubble Syndrome by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what business an aerospace company has doing providing IT services for others.

      I can understand diversity... but this is completely out of the aerospace "tree" !!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  8. I was involved with NG on a project once.... by quangdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fresh out of school with my CS degree I went to work on a project for my employer that involved partnering and working directly with folks from NG. The original deadline for shipping the solution was something like 6 months after I started. The complete and utter incompetence of the NG side of things wound up stretching this out more than 18 MONTHS longer, and the final delivery lacked a lot of the original stated requirements.

    Being the newbie to the whole corporate culture, I was shocked that people were not bothered at all by blown deadlines, missed estimates, and huge cost overruns. Shortly after the project finally delivered, I bailed to work for a much smaller company (fewer than 10 employees) where I discovered that I really love the smaller, more dynamic environment that only small companies can provide.

    Working for huge corporations just sucks.

    1. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work for a smaller DoD related company (17k employees, so not that small really) and I hear nothing but horror stories about NG, and have experienced one of them myself. NG originally developed our project but was not allowed to bid on the re-compete where we picked it up. It was bad, but we are fixing it. I really can't say much more than that at the moment.

    2. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to have to keep this ac for obvious reasons, but having experience working there I can say that deadlines are set with the expectation to fail. No it is not as blunt as saying we don't care about a deadline, but I would have to agree with you in referencing a smaller companies: they have the advantage that the "upper management" (or in this case team leader) knows what the hell is going on. Big companies are needed however in the long run, hell a 10 person, 5,000, even 20,000 staff is too small to run their aircraft carrier sector. My opinion is as follows:
      "Deadlines are like a box of chocolates, you never know what the hell your going to get." - or something like that haha

      cheers

    3. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Working for huge corporations just sucks.

      I used to work for Lockheed Martin. Now I work for a company with 50 employees.

      Talk about a head rush of culture shock.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I know. I used to work for Litton, and left 1 month before the NG purchase became final.

      Went to work for a small house doing Fibre Channel... Seriously major cognitive dissonance.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by tareko · · Score: 0

      In the short term, wasn't an 18 month project that ran way over budget and over time more profitable than one that would have been on time and on spec?

    6. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably but you die on the inside every day you have to work up bullshit excuse why this was bound to happen and why it's a good thing.

    7. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH HAI! I was wondering where my Super-Ego went!

    8. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      Many small defense contractors are pretty messed up also. If yours is honest and competent, you've done well.

    9. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      Probably but you die on the inside every day you have to work up bullshit excuse why this was bound to happen and why it's a good thing.

      Not too many people in this business seem to think that way. Zombie already maybe.

    10. Re:I was involved with NG on a project once.... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't say they die a little. They just die. :P

  9. NGC Culture by CherniyVolk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work with a fair number of ngc.com; I'm a contractor myself. At one point, I had a few interviews for Northrop and I'm so glad they over looked my talents because they seem to abuse the talent they have.

    Now, this may not be for every department or division, but almost every NGC employee I know is basically well familiar with furlough. Whether good or bad, NGC is left with the ability to place entire departments on furlough to reduce overhead costs in the event a contract dries up. Now perhaps it's their size, perhaps they simply don't care about their workers, but this sort of thing seems to happen often. I'd guess that no NGC employee with a tenure more than 2 years hasn't been out of work for up to a month or so. But this is how things are run there.

    See, government contracting works like this. You create a company, hire some folk to work on a contract. Whatever their salary is, you charge the government +50% or more, so essentially the government is not only flat out paying your salary but also the company for your services. If the contract ends, so does your job as the company may not want to charge overhead. In contrast to other business sectors, employment typically isn't grounded so harshly on the existence of a contract, which is where cost of business and business management can keep workers afloat even during down times (think department store).

    I only point out Northrop because while all government contracting is essentially this contract+play model, Northrop has a reputation of placing people on furlough much more often than other companies such as CACI, Raytheon, General Atomics etc. Some Northrop employees seem to live the lives similar to actors and actresses in Hollywood, and I'm not talking about Tom Hanks acting, but maybe those actors that get little spots from time to time on your sitcoms. They literally live in apartments, and wait for the phone to ring day after day. Northrop employees seem to wake up in the morning, wondering if they'll still have a job at the end of the day.

    What does this observation have to do with the op? Well, it seems that moral and motivation might be a bit low on a large scale at Northrop, so such blunders are no surprise to me.

    1. Re:NGC Culture by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      NGC is what we in the business refer to as a "body shop."

      http://www.realrates.com/bbs/messages/tips4.htm

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:NGC Culture by XorNand · · Score: 3, Informative

      See, government contracting works like this. You create a company, hire some folk to work on a contract. Whatever their salary is, you charge the government +50% or more, so essentially the government is not only flat out paying your salary but also the company for your services. If the contract ends, so does your job as the company may not want to charge overhead. In contrast to other business sectors, employment typically isn't grounded so harshly on the existence of a contract, which is where cost of business and business management can keep workers afloat even during down times (think department store).

      I do a lot of business with both the federal gov't and private sector businesses on IT projects. You've over-simplified things to the point of painting an inaccurate picture. Federal contracting is extremely complex and there are myriad types of contracts that can be awarded, each with different terms. It sounds like what you're describing is a labor-hour contract. The contractor bills the gov't for the "fully burdened cost" of putting a warm butt in a seat. This includes the worker's salary, overhead, G&A (general & administrative), and profit. All together, it's typically a lot more than a 50% markup of the staff's straight salary.

      Unlike most private sector contracts, when doing a fully burdened labor hour contract with the feds, the contractor will spell out exactly what their profit margin is. Generally this is only 6-10%, which is considerably lower than the private sector. Despite what everyone thinks, doing business with the gov't isn't all that lucrative. It's an extremely competitive market in which the bottom-line cost is almost always the most important factor. Contracting officers are even prohibited by law to give preferential treatment to companies that have previously done a great job.

      I can't really comment on forced furloughs, because I'm not familiar with how Northrup operates. But just because they do "government contracts" doesn't necessarily mean they can afford to keep highly-skilled staff on the payroll until they find a new project for them. Federal contracts can really help with sales revenue because they can be large awards and the government *always* pays. However, the trade off is all the red tape (which increases G&A costs) and the low profit margins. Next time you hear about Company X getting a $10M contract, don't just roll your eyes. Get a hold of their proposal and the contract and see what their actual profit is on the contract. Both documents are public property and available upon request from the federal contracting officer that made the award. (Defense related contracts might need to be pried from gov't with a FOIA request though)

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    3. Re:NGC Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which gov't you work for but all a contractor has to do is win one contract and then every upgrade/improvement/repair after that makes them the sole source. Doesn't take a genius to realize you can charge more if you aren't competing to get the job. And are you trying to say that the contractor doesn't inflate the hours at all to make up for the fixed profit?

    4. Re:NGC Culture by wkcole · · Score: 1

      Now, this may not be for every department or division, but almost every NGC employee I know is basically well familiar with furlough. Whether good or bad, NGC is left with the ability to place entire departments on furlough to reduce overhead costs in the event a contract dries up. Now perhaps it's their size, perhaps they simply don't care about their workers, but this sort of thing seems to happen often. I'd guess that no NGC employee with a tenure more than 2 years hasn't been out of work for up to a month or so. But this is how things are run there.

      See, government contracting works like this. You create a company, hire some folk to work on a contract. Whatever their salary is, you charge the government +50% or more, so essentially the government is not only flat out paying your salary but also the company for your services. If the contract ends, so does your job as the company may not want to charge overhead. In contrast to other business sectors, employment typically isn't grounded so harshly on the existence of a contract, which is where cost of business and business management can keep workers afloat even during down times (think department store).

      FWIW, this makes it sound like NGC is a couple of steps better than the contract IT shops that I'm familiar with that service the private sector. 100% markup is fairly common, and keeping idle employees "on furlough" is a concept that doesn't really exist. When the contract ends, the job ends. A pure pimp agency will usually try to place a profitable contractor in another spot ASAP once a customer provides notice, but they won't guarantee anyones rates and I have never heard of a pimp agency doing anything to hold on to a contractor who is between contracts if they don't have anything suitable immediately available. For "managed project" type contractors it is as bad or worse. Agencies typically make sure they have the power to take their people with them if they lose a project, but often they only exercise that power only as a tool and/or weapon applied to customers and competitors to the detriment of their employees, rather than to actually move them to other work.

    5. Re:NGC Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whoa anecdote! I've worked for DoD contractors for years (and on different coasts). I've never heard of anyone at Northrop being placed on furlogh so I guess we don't know any of the same employees. In my experience, when there are no contracts, the employer covers your salary until the numbers tell them to start laying people off. If you are an employee they either pay you or lay you off. You don't sit around at home waiting for a call. Thats one of the benefits of a big company. They have enough stuff going to ride the wave and not have to lay people off when someone is done a contract and the next one doesn't start for a week. Their incentive is to keep you because they need to show they have enough people to complete a contract to win it.

      Now have 2 data points.

      Such blunders are commonplace in any large organization. Someone name an entity of 150k+ people that works well to prove me wrong. With large systems things get complicated. There are a lot of stupid people out there and the bigger your organization, the more likely they'll creep in and screw things up with politics etc. But despite the large management structure there are plenty of smart people around to keep things running. Some things are so big they can only be done by huge groups...with a bunch of slackers riding along.

    6. Re:NGC Culture by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on what you consider "profit."

      If you consider the money going to the shareholders, then sure, you're right.

      However, government contractors aren't run to benefit the shareholders - they're run to benefit the executives. By building empires of lower employees the executives justify their own positions, their large salaries, and they get armies of people they can rule over.

      I'd consider any cost beyond the basic time and materials, and minimal overhead for basic facilities, to be "profit" in this sense... Sure, it shows up in the red on the corporate statement, but the only reason companies have black on their statements is to pay for the red that is executive salary, bonuses, and stock.

    7. Re:NGC Culture by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1

      I do a lot of business with both the federal gov't and private sector businesses on IT projects. You've over-simplified things to the point of painting an inaccurate picture.

      You are correct, the contracts can be very complex. There are all kinds of things that govern contracts, and I didn't mean to belittle this. I just wanted to over-simplify the general structure as it's here that the cause and effect of furloughs, layoffs and such persist.

      I'm also somewhat aware of contract awards, primarily from the music industry. When a band gets a 5 million dollar contract for two albums, what that really means is that (say, Capital Records) provides a list of studios they will pay for, and that 5 million dollars is to produce the albums (which itself is really expensive, considering a 300-500 dollar an hour studio), then marketing and all that other stuff. It's sorta like a loan fronted for the prospective costs of making those albums. How much of that money they get to pocket is rather thin.

  10. Animal House by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

    Kinda like brother Bluto in Animal House when he smashes the guitar, then looks at the shocked people and goes, "Heh, sorry."

  11. It was EMC storage failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was EMC storage that failed:

    http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2010/08/31/emc_system_serving_virginia_breaks_down/

    "A major portion of the network shut down on Thursday after some of the EMC gear malfunctioned. As many as 400 server computers in various government departments relied on the storage network and were knocked offline.

    Both Northrop Grumman and EMC declined to comment, directing all inquiries about the breakdown to the Virginia Information Technologies Agency, which oversees all of that state’s government computer systems. According to the agency’s website, EMC said that Thursday’s breakdown was unprecedented. “The manufacturer reports that the system and its underlying technology have an exemplary history of reliability, industry-leading data availability of more than 99.999% and no similar failure in one billion hours of run time,’’ the website said."

    1. Re:It was EMC storage failure by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > Both Northrop Grumman and EMC declined to comment,
      > The manufacturer reports that the system and its underlying technology have an exemplary history of reliability

      So who's lying ;).

      --
    2. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Both of them?

    3. Re:It was EMC storage failure by AB3A · · Score: 1

      Lesson: Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Nothing new about that...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    4. Re:It was EMC storage failure by realmolo · · Score: 1

      So, for their $2.6 billion, Virginia doesn't get redundant systems? Everything is on ONE SAN?!

      I would sue the living shit out of Northrop. That's insane.

    5. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Klinky · · Score: 1

      How are they counting one billion hours of run time? Are they counting uptime and multiplying it by each disk or something? One billion hours is 114,079 years... Five-nines for 1 billions hours is 1.14 years... At that rate they should be happy it only took Northrup a week to get things working again.

    6. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would sue the living shit out of Northrop. That's insane.

      Based on what would they sue? The contract they signed had no requirement of redundancy. As much fault as NG has in this, it's not like they broke the contract or anything. This is as much the fault of the incompetents in Virginia's IT Agency as on NG's.

      Apparently, when VITA negotiated its 10-year, $2.3 billion outsourcing contract with Northrop Grumman to modernize Virginia's 85 state government agencies' IT systems and networks, it forgot to require network that backup capability be provided in case of network failure, the Richmond Times-Disptach reported over the weekend.

    7. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually the lesson is to not let a bunch of incompetents draw up your IT contracts.

      Apparently, when VITA negotiated its 10-year, $2.3 billion outsourcing contract with Northrop Grumman to modernize Virginia's 85 state government agencies' IT systems and networks, it forgot to require network that backup capability be provided in case of network failure, the Richmond Times-Disptach reported over the weekend.

      I mean really? Requiring redundancy is such a basic requirement that you really have to wonder if the people in VITA even have a brain.

    8. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, for their $2.6 billion, Virginia doesn't get redundant systems? Everything is on ONE SAN?!

      I would sue the living shit out of Northrop. That's insane.

      RTFA. There was a backup SAN.

    9. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wonder how many customers they have? 1 billion hours is a lot of hours...something like 114,000 YEARS. .... and i'm personally aware of another EMC San which suffered similar catastrophic failure, and i'm not that well connected.

    10. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have experience of building a single SAN with two or more different SAN vendors, we're all ears.

    11. Re:It was EMC storage failure by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is we need multiple governments.. gotcha.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    12. Re:It was EMC storage failure by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      Also, for those of you who don't work based off government contracts: If you can't justify a project as coming under something defined in the contract, you don't do it. It's not about laziness, incompetence, or greed, it's because the government is full of rules lawyers that will start to jump up and down and demand to know why you spent $X on something not in the contract. Working for $Unnamed_government_contractor, I will say that one thing they make very clear is that you do not charge time from one project to a different project.

      It's boneheaded to not have redundancy, but that's a problem in the requirements, and the requirements are set up by Virginia (probably in negotiations between a nontechnical government bureaucrat and a nontechnical NG bureaucrat, whose shared knowledge of networks is limited to looking up funny cat pictures).

    13. Re:It was EMC storage failure by FatGath · · Score: 1

      I would sue the living shit out of Northrop. That's insane.

      No Time for that, Cooch too busy with frivolous lawsuits. Besides, that would cut down on the campaign contributions.

    14. Re:It was EMC storage failure by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Referring to an EMC system as "one SAN" is (probably) a gross oversimplification. EMC are the storage vendor you go to when money is no object, and you cannot, absolutely cannot have downtime. If Northrop had the system configured correctly, this is a huge black mark against EMC.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    15. Re:It was EMC storage failure by bored · · Score: 1

      There were some other details about how it was a "memory board" that caused the problem an how the fail-over system didn't work properly. So on paper no one can be blamed.

      To me this now seems SOP in the computer industry. Consolidation is king without regard for the idea that consolidation tends to form giant single points of failure. Furthermore, backups and redundant systems are rarely tested. Even when properly tested, fail-over is pure luck as the actual failure case may not be as clear cut as the fail-over system is designed to handle. From my experience i'm betting that over half the time when a real failure occurs it propagates into the fail-over (resulting in double failure), isn't detected properly, or one of a half dozen other similar problems and the system comes crashing down. With all this "consolidation" instead of a single system failing for a week (bad enough) they loose services everywhere (totally unacceptable).

    16. Re:It was EMC storage failure by sjames · · Score: 1

      Given that crowd, whose lips are moving?

    17. Re:It was EMC storage failure by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's such a basic requirement that you would think you would get it for that price. It sounds like using a loophole after being caught out cutting corners to me.

    18. Re:It was EMC storage failure by danwiz · · Score: 1

      Annual Disaster Recovery testing should have discovered the deficiency.

  12. $2.6 billion service contract? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "Northrop's $2.6 billion service contract with Virginia's government..."

    What could they possibly be doing for Virginia that should cost $2.6 billion?

    1. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Pojut · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here you go, direct from our local news radio station.

      "Northrop Grumman holds a $2.4 billion, 10-year contract with the Virginia Information Technologies Agency to build, operate and maintain the state's 7-year-old, problem-plagued consolidated computer services bureaucracy. It is the largest single-vendor contract in Virginia history. The partnership has been repeatedly criticized in JLARC studies for poor and tardy delivery of services, cost overruns and system failures."

      These systems are directly integrated into the DMV, as well as the Department of Social Services and Department of Taxation, amongst others.

    2. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" by Naomi Klein for an insight into how these contracts get created as part of the effort to "down size" inefficient government agencies. Amazon link at -- http://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0312427999/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1283529678&sr=8-1 ...

    3. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Interesting...thanks for the tip!

    4. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Still, what could they possibly be doing for that amount of money. If you work it out, that's almost 30 thousand dollars every hour for 10 years (I didn't even take out weekends or holidays or anything). That's ~890,000 per month. I could run one bangin' IT organization on 240 million dollars a year. Hell, the company I work for now (which is in the top 10 on the Fortune 500 list), our yearly IT budget is smaller than that.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    5. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Still, what could they possibly be doing for that amount of money.

      Lining their pockets. What else?

    6. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Didn't say VA was getting their money's worth, just wanted to tell people what they were doing :-)

    7. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "...poor and tardy delivery of services, cost overruns and system failures."
      >
      > These systems are directly integrated into the DMV, as well as the Department of Social Services and Department of Taxation, amongst others.

      Weren't poor/tardy delivery of services, cost overruns, and system failures always integrated into those departments?

    8. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This kind of thing seems to be a growing trend in government IT. I'm posting anonymously because while I don't think I'm going to say anything that violates an NDA, it's better to be vague and sure.

      The county that I live in recently made a move like this: they fired basically all of their IT staff and replaced them with the lowest bidding consulting company.

      The upside of that from a certain fiscal standpoint is that they've eliminated a bunch of positions with pensions and good (and therefore expensive) benefits. These people have been replaced, in some departments, by the exact same people now subcontracting through the consulting company. This isn't really cheaper -- they won't have additional pension obligations to those people, but they're drawing much higher salaries than before, and obviously the consulting company gets a sizeable cut too.

      In other departments, all the long-term employees have been replaced by new consultants. This is a problem in that, probably the people who had those jobs should have documented their networks and tasks much better, but the fact is, they didn't. The whole memory of those departments has been flushed. Inexperienced people are now trying to figure out how to maintain processes that literally no one who works there knows anything about. It's a disaster and it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

      Meanwhile, the county executive is running for governor, touting the above as a great accomplishment. Hey, he shrunk the size of government by eliminating many permanent positions! By the time people realize that, not always, but sometimes, a lifer IT person is worth their pay because of the institutional memory they have of a thousand important things that were never documented, the election will be over.

    9. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by AB3A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent way up. I've seen it in other places too.

      Often when you ask people in the accounting department, they'll say they don't really know what's going on because IT made the system. When you talk to IT, they'll say they don't know because the system was specified by Accounting. The truth is that some smart guys in each department got together and forged some sort of system together. Then the smart guys went on to bigger and better things, while the peons were left with some special voodoo system.

      Now you want to move said voodoo system over to a consulting company. The assumption is that the Accountants know every detail of what the old system did. Well, they don't. But nobody is willing to step forward and say that. So the new consultants come along and gosh, nobody knows what the systems do.

      Then people ponder why it "doesn't work." Sigh.

      This is how shit happens.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    10. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Clearly you don't understand how the government works. It's a circle.
      Congress gives companies huge contracts -> Companies make mountains of profit -> Companies donate to congressman's compaign -> Congress gives companies huge contracts

    11. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Still, what could they possibly be doing for that amount of money. If you work it out, that's almost 30 thousand dollars every hour for 10 years (I didn't even take out weekends or holidays or anything). That's ~890,000 per month.

      That's about $20 million/month ($240 million per year / 12 months/year).

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this more of Scott Walker's running Milwaukee County like a typical CEO. Sell out the future for the present and (try) to move on (to governor) before people realize what he has really done?

    13. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are running a data center. The electricity alone would be a significant portion of their fee. Data and voice transport to various Virginia state offices would also be significant. They are not just performing IT services.

    14. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm seeing the beginning stages of the same type of things in the State of California. Much of the infrastructure is segmented, with each agency operating much of their own IT equipment and services. Some people have come in trying to consolidate IT operations, move all agency equipment to central data centers, centralize email, etc, etc. They aren't saying this, but we know this will eventually mean much of the IT staff from each agency will just be laid off, which could possibly result in the same thing you mention: Paying less in direct employee salaries/pensions, higher cost due to contractors, and lack of knowledge from contractors because all of the employees who set it up are gone. Especially with all of the budget problems here, they are trying to tout it as a way to save costs.

      So much of the state's infrastructure is segmented, very old, complex, and undocumented, so good luck to them for trying that. They are still running COBOL on their payroll system for christs sake.

    15. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that kind of money, those servers better be installed in an aircraft carrier commissioned by the state.

      Afterall, building ships with high quality and cutting edge technology is something they're actually good at. Right?

      Oh wait...

    16. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course nobody will step forward and admit anything. They might as well make their second sentence asking for their last paycheque, since in corporate america these days, pointing out problems is a one-way ticket to unemployment. Nothing the higher-ups love more than to scapegoat all their problems onto someone lower than them... and who better to use as a scapegoat than the one pointing it out. OBVIOUSLY they know something about it, since they mentioned it, so therefore they must have caused it.

      It's a downward spiral where nobody wins. Well, except the execs who get a bonus for firing people.

    17. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Yep. You're right. I borked up the calcs. the 890K number was for 30 hours, not 30 days.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    18. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by hey! · · Score: 1

      If accounting doesn't know what's going on, then they're incompetent. Accounting is essentially financial epistemology: it is about creating true, *justifiable* beliefs. The ultimate test is the audit. An *outsider* comes in and takes everything you say about yourself financially and puts it to the test. Then they sample things that happened (e.g. an invoice payment) and make every event is reflected on the financial statements.

      When you have a situation where ignorance is tolerated in the accounting department, there's a good chance something corrupt going on.

      I once worked at a biggish non-profit as IT director. The place habitually skated on the edge of financial disaster, and there was a lot of pressure on me to "improve the financial systems" by which management meant "software". It was true that the financial software was crap, but what was worse was that accounting was run by a bunch of amateurs who created complex, bizarre procedures. Sometimes checks would come in, and they would get lost for weeks. That's crazy: everyone knows you cash checks immediately and you hold onto the money as long as you can. So when the finance department head leaves, I suggest we bring in this friend of mine as interim manager. The selling point is that he knows a huge amount about financial software, but more importantly he's a really sharp CPA. Right from day one, he starts tearing out all the procedural cruft in the the accounting department.

      This causes all kinds of grief and woe. One person freaks out because my friend the CPA tells her she can't use her color highlighters anymore. The color coding system she had devised was non-standard and unsound. People start to quit. No problem. We hire replacements. Not one of the people we hired had less than fifteen years of corporate bookkeeping experience. These weren't kids right out of college willing to work cheap, these were pros and worth every penny. For once we knew whether we were making money or losing it; whether we had enough cash to keep going or whether we were going to run out. You don't save money by hiring an accounting staff that doesn't have the expertise to manage money.

      This all happened very fast, so one day the CEO takes my friend aside and asks, "Can these new people you hired figure out how much money I'm paid?" This seems like a strange question to ask, but the CEO's official salary was very high for an organization that size. What wasn't obvious by casual inspection of the books was that he was actually took two salaries, his official salary and a second salary through a paper organization that charged back internally for normal operation services. That was why our overhead rate was so high; I'd estimate that ten cents on every grant dollar we landed went straight into his pocket... Well, not *straight*; that's the entire point.

      So anyways, the boss asks my friend that loaded question, and he laughs and says, "I wouldn't hire anyone who wasn't competent enough to figure that out." Hell, even *I* had worked that one out, and I wasn't an accountant. Anyway, not long after that my friend is no longer working for the organization, and management is reorganized so that as IT director I'm no longer on the management committee.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    19. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by AB3A · · Score: 1

      Read my sig. It explains everything.

      Yes, they're incompetent. If they were really good they wouldn't stick around. Most places have a difficult time justifying the sorts of salaries that keep the good people on staff.

      Look, the problem is that large organizations have often bought in to the notion that Human Resources knows what it's doing. They do not. They can not. I've watched this process in my own company. It's not pretty. It is a process designed by lawyer/MBA dweebs where success is almost always accidental.

      The difference in your case is that people took the bull by the horns and attempted to resolve the problem. In a larger company, say 1000 employees or more, I can just about guarantee that you wouldn't get that kind of authority.

      The State of Virginia was trying to outsource a process they did not fully understand. I don't care how you slice it, this is a recipe for disaster. You don't go to an attorney and ask them to fix your legal problems for you. You go to him or her with a clear plan of what you want to do, or you will end up with nothing but expenses and no end of trouble.

      It's no different for IT. There has to be a clear sense of deliverable services and precise resources defined, or you'll get some crap weasel mess like what the state of Virginia got.

      And to top it all off, the MBA crowd frequently deludes themselves in to thinking that this can be done without assistance of any sort. I hope these idiots learned their lesson.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    20. Re:$2.6 billion service contract? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      This is a problem in that, probably the people who had those jobs should have documented their networks and tasks much better, but the fact is, they didn't. The whole memory of those departments has been flushed.

      The problem is you have people that say "everyone in the department knows about X so there in no need to document X" or even have "everyone qualified to do that job learnt about X in their first semester at University" - then you have the whole department removed and replaced by people that wouldn't know where to start on the documentation even if there is enough.
      The only answer to that problem where you don't know who will be doing the job is to dumb everything down into Standard Operating Procedures simple enough for a recent High School graduate to follow. For some things it's not worth it and you just have to leave enough information for somebody with the experience, training and a clue to sort out.

  13. The trauma... by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It lead to the Great Pr0n Outage of '10.

    Lechers had to actually go outdoors and look at live, clothed people for a change.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The trauma... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      look at live, clothed people for a change.

      That's vile and disgusting.

    2. Re:The trauma... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      And now you know why some European countries have chosen to consider internet access in the same category as gas, electricity and water. Society depends on it ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  14. at least they never said ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That "they'll fix it so it never happens again."

    I used to work in IT and I hated it whenever some manager said that to a customer. Things fail, they can fail multiple times and different failures can have the same results so the statement that "it'll never happen again" would be a bold faced lie.

    1. Re:at least they never said ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I used to work in IT and I hated it whenever some manager said that to a customer."

      Yeah, specially when the incident study is over and it comes out that a techy already told what the problems were, what the possible outcomes would be and what the remediation should look like and how much it would cost. Then that very same manager from the beginning tells (again) to the technicians: "no we won't do that: is too expensive and missaligned with our bussiness goals" while getting his bonus intact.

  15. I first read the headline as by edwebdev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Northrop Grumman Says 'I'm Sorry' For Virginia IT Outrage"

    1. Re:I first read the headline as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I thought they were sorry for outing virgins....

  16. Incompetent IT folk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, them Indians, stealing all our jaaaaabs and doing crappy work on top of it!

    Oh, wait! Don't tell me these were American IT staff, locally recruited in the good ol' US of A?? Meh, this has got to be someone else's fault. Americans in IT are simply flawless!

    1. Re:Incompetent IT folk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes these are second rate locally recruited American IT staff. If they could get past the security requirements these positions would certainly be filled by Indians since a talented American would not touch it.

    2. Re:Incompetent IT folk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these positions would certainly be filled by Indians

      Second rate Indian programmers to be precise. The talented ones wouldn't bother.

  17. Government contracting is the B leagues by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    This is happening because all of the best IT talent these days are doing startups or working at cool companies like Google and Facebook. This means that Northrup Grumann is staffing their teams with people that can't get those cooler IT jobs. That's the real cause of this disaster for Virginia.

    1. Re:Government contracting is the B leagues by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      It's Richmond, there are no cool start-ups like that anywhere in the city. Ok, maybe on the West End, but the data center is in Chester, south of Downtown.

  18. 3-year-olds know better than that by swschrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    good thing Northrup Grumman doesn't do anything important, like, say, vital national security support.

    oh, wait... .

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:3-year-olds know better than that by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much that's actually related. When I read the contractor was NG, I asked myself "what the hell are they in that business for?"

      The answer, money, is of course, a major suspect in the failure.

      This contract should not have gone to someone like NG, who probably just turned around and sold it to EMC who should have been competent. That is, if it really was EMC and not one of their subcontractors.

    2. Re:3-year-olds know better than that by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      But according to Northrup Grumman they were "recently recognized by the National Association of Counties for Outstanding Achievement in the area of "Information Technology in State Government – Enterprise IT Management Initiatives".

    3. Re:3-year-olds know better than that by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      Ha! Good one! Ask Northrop what they think of themselves. Mod that +2 Funny.

      That quote cuts off an important bit: "In fact, our partnership with the Virginia Information Technologies Agency was recently recognized" (emphasis mine). So if that's this same project it's not like we're talking about that recognition as a proven track record, though other examples may exist. And this is, in fact, the same project, as you'll can see from the figures ($1.9B over 10 years, which apparently grew to $2.4B) shown in the below linked document.

      A bit of digging reveals that link isn't quite up-to-date either (including a broken link to the relevant press release), and this recognition is (WARNING- PDF) two years old.
      The most interesting and relevant quote I noted was:

      "In 31 months, VITA and Northrop Grumman: Modernized much of Virginia's infrastructure - Virginia has two custom-built, secure and reliable data center and backup data center facilities with redundancy and advanced physical security."

      Reliable? Backup? Redundancy? That's strikes one, two, and three right there. Just because you claim 99.999% doesn't mean you actually have the capacity to deliver on the promise. But why wait for an actual track record before giving an award on those merits? Because government tends to hand out awards following completion of implementation of projects or stages thereof, such as in this case. This isn't a "the NG-built system is celebrating 10 years of reliable service" kind of award. Those are rare.

      So I'm thinking that may be the last framed piece of paper Northrop gets from that group in a while.

  19. Exactly well sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently turned down a offer from NG. I turned them down for a number of reasons but mainly past employee experience. Once I had learned that they unexpectedly cut employee salaries in the past to make numbers that was a very large part of the decision. There where other issues like competence and attitudes, that I expect in govt related positions. They are simply not going to attract top talent with their track record.

  20. More background. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    can't find my account info sorry.

    More background for those interested.

    http://www.govtech.com/gt/749378 this is the same state agency which last summer fired the head of the agency because he attempted to make Northrop Grumman comply with its obligations.

    For some background on their previous problems try the IEEE.

    http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/virginia-information-technologies-agency-believes-in-the-perfect-network-fairy

    And yes, this is the same agency which has been help up as an example of the benefits of taking diverse IT services and pulling them into a central cloud.

  21. In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    NG reports increased profits and record bonuses for key executives

  22. One Merger Away From Completness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Northrop-Grumman just needs to merge with Fairchild and their company initials will be complete - NFG

  23. Go read Virginia IT's website... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go see it yourself here.

    On Wednesday, August 25, at approximately 3 p.m., the Commonwealth of Virginia experienced an information technology (IT) infrastructure outage that affected 27 of the Commonwealth's 89 agencies and caused 13 percent of the Commonwealth's file servers to fail. The failure was in the equipment used for data storage, commonly known as a storage area network (SAN). Specifically, the SAN that failed was an EMC DMX-3.

    According to the manufacturer of the storage system, the events that led to the outage appear to be unprecedented. The manufacturer reports that the system and its underlying technology have an exemplary history of reliability, industry-leading data availability of more than 99.999 percent and no similar failure has occurred in more than one billion hours of run time. A root cause analysis of the failure is currently being conducted.

    Anybody else read this like some middle age guy after "finishing a bit too quickly" and telling his , "I swear honey, this the first time this has ever happened to me..."

  24. Apology by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So Virginia taxpayers will continue to get screwed, but Northrop Grumman has now extended a reach-around?

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Apology by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      It's standard issue for Virginians, they're used to getting screwed annually.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      getting screwed annually.

      You spelled that last word there wrong . . .

  25. Not Quite by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    I used to work at Lockheed Martin and I worked with a tremendous amount of talented people. The people tended to be a little more risk-averse, career-wise.

    The likelihood of working 60 hour weeks is less, which is an attractions. Benefits used to be good. So it just attracts different people.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  26. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ironically, Microsoft has a case study touting the Virginia DMV project as a success story.

    http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2005-Enterprise-Edition/Virginia-Department-of-Motor-Vehicles/Virginia-DMV-Enhances-Decisions-Boosts-Safety-Through-Integration-with-Other-Agencies/4000004307

    1. Re:Irony by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Except that what is described in that case study has absolutely nothing to do with the issue in the story here.

  27. Real Good "Engineering" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at me! I'm a "Systems Engineer", or "IT Engineer" or "MCSE"...I want the fancy "Engineer" title, but I don't want to be held financially accountable, legally acountable, and be held blameless when I do something wrong/stupid/illegal.

    I love IT "Engineer" folks who can just get away with "oops" or "i'm sorry" when they piss away hundreds of thousands, or millions of dollars.

    That's some fine "Engineering" there...maybe we can design cars and life support systems that way too...

  28. which means they don't know how to fix things? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    where I come from, you swap out the suspicious or dead junk, and roll the data back on from backups.

    this, of course, requires you know how to find dead junk, swap it, and retrieve tapes that you knew how to make, and roll them back on according to your training.

    remove all of the above, and it sounds like the error they have.

    monkeys cost less, and can do exactly the same job. just sayin'....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  29. maybe they did not test a hardware fail and the fa by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    maybe they did not test a hardware fail and the fall over back did not take over / was not setup right.

  30. Why NGC is so FUBAR by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Northrop Grumman was cobbled together over several years from about 1999-2006 from Northrop, Grumman, TRW and several other players. It is so dysfunctional because it is composed of so many competing units that don't operate like a single company. In fact, when I briefly worked for them out of college, most of my coworkers were from TRW and hated the idea of being NGC employees.

    1. Re:Why NGC is so FUBAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked on contracts where we were subcontracted to one division of Northrup Grumman and bidding against another division of Northrup Grumman. Incompetence seemed to be the only common thread between the two divisions.

    2. Re:Why NGC is so FUBAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at TRW and other similar firms in the 90s and before. They were all quite individually dysfunctional, believe me.

      And it is at the very least additive.

  31. If it weren't for the NDAs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might say more...

    These agencies like to place the blame on the contract vendor where they can. Often times it's their own failures that they refuse to acknowledge that cause these over-runs, missed deadlines and so on.

    Let me tell you, I used to think it was insane that a toilet seat might cost $300 dollars. Now that I've seen how the government contracts at the federal level it seems like that price was probably a bargain. I don't expect governments at the state level to behave any better than the feds either.

    I don't know how NG's state sector runs their business but if it's anything like what I've seen in other sectors then VA KNOWS exactly what they bought and APPROVED it before it ever went live. Then again... well, never mind, I don't think I can give my perspective on it.. so read about it for yourself... http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/hp-holds-navy-network-hostage/

    1. Re:If it weren't for the NDAs... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No wonder it's only worth buying stuff from Asian whitebox companies instead of HP etc. HP and others have just got too lazy from ripping off the taxpayers that they no longer need to make anything with a price and capability that will sell.

  32. My experience as a contractor by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Getting charged out at $100/hour while getting paid $10-14/hour was depressing, especially since the contracting company did nothing in that case apart from collect and hand out money (insurance, health care etc was my responsibility). When the client (actually former workplace encumbered by a requirement for layoffs and a hiring freeze) looked as if they would be able to employ me directly the contract company took near criminal steps to poison my relationship with that company. I left after being blamed for a quite few things that happened long before I'd even heard of the place and decided it was easier to work in a different industry.
    Many places screw over both their clients and their employees.

  33. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found the root problem!

    From NG's own site: "Mills was vice president of Mission Assurance/Six Sigma at Northrop Grumman’s former Mission Systems sector, where she led the strategy, planning and execution for Six Sigma to increase customer satisfaction through streamlined operations and improved quality."