Spammers Attack Apple's Ping Social Network

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Spammers Attack Apple's Ping Social Network

Posted by Soulskill on Saturday September 4, 2010 @01:29AM from the strict-inevitabilities dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Scammers and spammers have deluged the new Ping musical social network, created by Apple and built into the new version of iTunes. Sophos researchers have found that Ping is being overrun by scams and spam messages. 'Apple seems to have anticipated a certain degree of malfeasance, as profile pictures that you upload will not appear until approved by Apple. They are likely filtering for other offensive content as well, so they probably have means in place they could use to stop the spam.' It's ironic that the most common scams on Ping right now revolve around Apple's own iPhone." The Sophos blog post adds that Apple is doing their best to clamp down on the spam, manually deleting many of the offending messages for now. Reader Tootech adds that Facebook integration was quickly disabled, possibly because of blocked API access.

85 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

maybe spamming is a ...... by 3seas · 2010-09-04 01:32 · Score: 2, Interesting

...disease that has not yet been recognized much less treated.
1. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 01:41 · Score: 0
  
  Best cured with the cold, hard steel of a bullet.
2. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 01:56 · Score: 0
  
  Better the cold, soft lead of a bullet.
3. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by tomhudson · 2010-09-04 02:41 · Score: 2, Informative
  
  Better the cold, soft lead of a bullet.
  
  How can this be? Are you going to be inserting the bullet into the spammer manually?
  I'll see your single cold bullet and raise you with a spray of hot lead.
  But since I don't own a gun, I'll have to go to the store and buy a whole mess of fishing sinkers, and melt them on the stove.
  My way, it's only the hope of dying that keeps them alive.
4. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Arthur+Grumbine · 2010-09-04 02:44 · Score: 1
  
  Better the hot, ionizing radiation of a nuclear warhead. It's the only way to be sure.
  
  --
  Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
5. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Sponge+Bath · 2010-09-04 03:58 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  AC1 Wrote: "...hard steel of a bullet."
  AC2 Wrote: "...soft lead of a bullet."
  With FMJ you can both be right, but wouldn't you prefer the more satisfying hands on approach of an aluminum baseball bat? It has that personal touch that says: "I care."
6. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by cawpin · 2010-09-04 04:55 · Score: 2, Informative
  
  No. A FMJ bullet has a jacket made of COPPER, not steel. No bullet uses a steel jacket as that would wear out a barrel very quickly. Some AP (for Armor Piercing) uses a steel penetrator core, a very small steel shank inside the bullet.
  
  Also, spamming is like a shotgun, spreading small pellets EVERYWHERE hoping to hit something.
7. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 09:18 · Score: 0
  
  No gun? Pfft, exercise your Geek cred a bit, build a rail gun, gosh darn it!
8. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 17:06 · Score: 0
  
  "Also, spamming is like a shotgun, spreading small pellets EVERYWHERE hoping to hit something."
  Spamming is like a rat, dropping small pellets EVERYWHERE in hopes someone steps on it.
9. Re:maybe spamming is a ...... by Yvan256 · 2010-09-05 10:02 · Score: 1
  
  wouldn't you prefer the more satisfying hands on approach of an aluminium baseball bat? It has that personal touch that says: "I care."
  Not to mention that aluminium is 100% recyclable!
Irony.. by Moridin42 · 2010-09-04 01:37 · Score: 3, Insightful

Do you know it, mofo? No. You do not. It is not ironic that apple hardware (iphones) is being used to entice people into a scam on apple software. Especially when the software is what you use to keep your iphone up to date.
Perhaps if they were scamming you into buying music for a zune, we could talk irony.

--
I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
1. Re:Irony.. by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 01:58 · Score: 1, Informative
  
  We need to invent a new word for the people who keep abusing ironic. Otherwise irony is going to have a different meaning in 10 more years. Teaching them what irony actually means is hopeless. Ditto for literally... except that 'literally' is already a lost cause, and irony isn't (yet).
2. Re:Irony.. by Kilrah_il · 2010-09-04 02:02 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  I agree, it is quite ironic that both are literally a lost cause! Right?
  
  --
  Whenever in an argument, remember this.
3. Re:Irony.. by imamac · 2010-09-04 02:39 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Oblig xkcd.
4. Re:Irony.. by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 08:49 · Score: 0
  
  Do you know it, mofo? No. You do not. It is not ironic that apple hardware (iphones) is being used to entice people into a scam on apple software. Especially when the software is what you use to keep your iphone up to date.
  Perhaps if they were scamming you into buying music for a zune, we could talk irony.
  That's not irony either, Alanis.
5. Re:Irony.. by Moridin42 · 2010-09-04 11:07 · Score: 1
  
  Apparently you learned what irony isn't from a song, and that is all you know about the word. Let me help you out with that.
  Irony:
  
  5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
  
  If you can't see the irony in being scammed into buying music from a service offered inside of the iTunes Music Store client, you may be beyond help.
  
  --
  I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
6. Re:Irony.. by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 13:39 · Score: 0
  
  The word for false irony is "alanic", named after Alanis Morissette. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=alanic
Ping? by mangu · 2010-09-04 01:41 · Score: 4, Funny

Is that one of those sites that try to profit from the misspellings?
Does spamming still generate real profits? by rednip · 2010-09-04 01:44 · Score: 1

I doubt if there is anyone left who thinks that offers of v1gra and riches from Nigerian princes are real opportunities. Can they really still be profitable? I'm sure that botnets and programs are still popular, but do they really generate real profits from unwitting users, or are the only people feeding such enterprises are those who attempt to profit from it. I'm guessing that many if not most of the victims actually know that someone is getting ripped off, but think that it's themselves who will come out ahead.

--
The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
1. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by tnk1 · 2010-09-04 01:53 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  The cost of sending mass emails is still so low that even if they get one sucker a week out of millions of messages sent, it is still profitable, and honestly, they probably get more than that.
  Its easy for us to sit back and laugh at these situations, but there are still plenty of people out that who are unaware of what happens out on the wider Internet.
  Its not going to last forever, but it will probably last longer than we would expect.
2. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by kantos · 2010-09-04 01:59 · Score: 1
  
  you are making the assumption that that is the sole goal of the spammers... I don't think that is a safe assumption. Nor do I think that it is safe to assume that people won't get suckered by it anyway.
  
  --
  Any and all content posted above may be ignored, considered irrelevant, or otherwise dismissed.
3. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Quarters · 2010-09-04 01:59 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  I doubt if there is anyone left who thinks that offers of v1gra and riches from Nigerian princes are real opportunities.
  Do you just have a feeling that people stopped being stupid or can you cite a specific date and time you saw the majority of humanity show some shred of intellect over greed?
4. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Kilrah_il · 2010-09-04 02:15 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Why do you say these offers are unreal? I got a this pill by mail and now my erection is never ending (both time-wise and length-wise), which goes well with all the boatloads of money I got from this nice guy in distress who mailed me the other day. If you want more details, contact me at ******** (In order to view the contact information, you are requested to send 100$ to the following bank acco#%$# - *** Transmission Blocked ***.
  
  --
  Whenever in an argument, remember this.
5. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by nurb432 · 2010-09-04 02:29 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  If they didn't turn a profit, they wouldn't be out there.
  
  --
  ---- Booth was a patriot ----
6. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by IamTheRealMike · 2010-09-04 02:36 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  I doubt if there is anyone left who thinks that offers of v1gra .... are real opportunities
  What makes you think they aren't? You realize that a lot of these online pharma stores do in fact sell pharmaceuticals, right? Of course if you buy them you might get dosages too strong, too weak, or sold alongside other things that can kill you, but they do sell Viagra! One reason the "Canadian Pharmacy" is everywhere is because they have built up brand recognition amongst casual/recreational users of ED drugs, so they get repeat custom.
7. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by kevingolding2001 · 2010-09-04 02:56 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Unfortunately yes. There are still morons waiting to be fleeced
8. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by martyb · 2010-09-04 03:21 · Score: 2, Interesting
  
  If they didn't turn a profit, they wouldn't be out there.
  True, but I would argue that it's worse than that; it's a matter of PERCEPTION:
  If they didn't THINK they COULD turn a profit, they wouldn't be out there. Right or wrong, the perceived reward to the perceived risk is such that many continue to attempt it. As you say, some likely do turn a profit. Of those that do not, and close up shop, there are still others who think THEY CAN, and set up shop to start spamming. And so the spamming continues.
  Until such time as those who might spam conclude the potential risk exceeds the potential reward, we will continue to have spammers among us. Technological means can go a long way, yes, but given past experience, there always seems to be yet another new way to bypass these controls. Heck, I was on the internet when the first spam message was posted on usenet and saw the huge reaction. Nothing has yet been able to stop it.
  Yikes! It's worse than I thought! I just looked up spam on wikipedia and discovered this:
  
  In the late 19th Century Western Union allowed telegraphic messages on its network to be sent to multiple destinations. The first recorded instance of a mass unsolicited commercial telegram is from May 1864. Up until the Great Depression wealthy North American residents would be deluged with nebulous investment offers.
  Alas, human nature being what it is even though the technology may change, I fear that spam will be with us for a long time to come.
9. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by pyrosine · 2010-09-04 03:22 · Score: 1
  
  *shakes head* That she still believes she is not gullible is ridiculous.. On a side note, how is it that the author managed to write about scamming and then went on to something about reporting hackers? Made me do a double take
10. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Americium · 2010-09-04 03:27 · Score: 0, Redundant
  
  Of course they would still be out there, it would just become more humorous when no money is involved. Just think of your spambox full of Rick Roll videos.
11. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by rednip · 2010-09-04 03:41 · Score: 1
  
  but there are still plenty of people out that who are unaware of what happens out on the wider Internet.
  Do you honestly think that there is anyone who has been on the internet longer than a day who's unfamiliar with spam? Sure if there was just one or a hundred pushing such scams, maybe the market could still be fruitful, but there are thousands or more
  My postulate is not that there isn't any money in spam, just that the only people making any real money are those who sell services to people willing to 'invest' in such 'businesses'.
  
  --
  The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
12. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by thePowerOfGrayskull · 2010-09-04 04:06 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  In this way, I think that spam filtering has hurt the Internet. People will rely on it over-much -- meaning that something gets past the spam filters, there is possibly a significant subset of the Internet-using population who will assume it's legit. (In this case, significant only needs to be a fraction of a percent for this to be very profitable.)
  That being said, one possibility I've wondered about is that while people are paying spammers to do their thing (thus ensuring the spammers a profit), it may not really have a noticeable effect on the product sales. I could see a rather limitless market of people who tried such services once, realized it was a waste and never tried again.
  I'd love to hear from someone who actual employed such "services" to find out what (if any) difference they made; if they recouped their costs; and if they tracked how many sales came from spam vs other channels.
13. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 04:06 · Score: 0
  
  Spam isn't much about profit anymore, more so, its a means to "recruit" new members into a botnet.
14. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by coryking · 2010-09-04 06:53 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Spam filters may have hurt the Internet for the reason you state... But the alternative is wading through an inbox (or webforum, blog, etc) that is 99.999% spam.
  Of the servers I've dealt with, something. Like 98% of the raw smtp traffic was spam. Without spam filters, the Internet would be unusable.
15. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by MobileTatsu-NJG · 2010-09-04 07:06 · Score: 1
  
  Can they really still be profitable?
  Spammers are paid before any profit is gained or lost. You don't actually need people buying stuff for spam services to be purchased, you just need people trying to sell or scam shit.
  
  --
  
  "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
16. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by MobileTatsu-NJG · 2010-09-04 07:14 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  If they didn't turn a profit, they wouldn't be out there.
  Correction: They want to turn a profit and SPAM is a cheap way to attempt that.
  The difference is that it doesn't matter if anybody buys it or not, the SPAM's already gone out.
  
  --
  
  "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
17. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Patch86 · 2010-09-04 09:00 · Score: 2, Interesting
  
  What else are you going to do with the massive botnet between big decrypt or password cracking jobs?
  It could well be just what they do on idle. If it gets 1 hit in a million, it would still be more profitable than letting your 100 thousand hacked machines sit there doing nothing for hours at a time.
18. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 09:47 · Score: 0
  
  Do you honestly think that there is anyone who has been on the internet longer than a day who's unfamiliar with spam?
  Yes. Examples of people who have no clue here.
19. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by thePowerOfGrayskull · 2010-09-04 16:56 · Score: 1
  
  I'm thinking without effective spam filters, a more reliable method of email security and sender identification would have been standardized years ago.
20. Re:Does spamming still generate real profits? by mjwx · 2010-09-05 12:35 · Score: 1
  
  Its not going to last forever, but it will probably last longer than we would expect.
  You could say the same things about real life, but we've seen how that turns out. The Nigerian 419 scams are not new, not by a long shot. Con men have been using that one for almost 200 years, the scam is better known as "The Spanish Prisoner" where the con pretends to be in correspondence with a wealthy individual imprisoned in Spain and then promises to return a large sum of money in exchange for fronting up a smaller sum, sound familiar?
  
  These types of scams have been going on for hundreds of years, spam is just the new digital variant. Theoretically everyone should know yet there seems to be no shortage of new naive people to fall for them.
  
  --
  Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Flood ping or ping of death by deniable · 2010-09-04 01:54 · Score: 1, Interesting

What is it with Apple and the network stack? First IOS, now Ping. What's next, GPS for the iPhone called Traceroute?
1. Re:Flood ping or ping of death by Arthur+Grumbine · 2010-09-04 02:49 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  What is it with Apple and the network stack? First IOS, now Ping. What's next, GPS for the iPhone called Traceroute?
  Nah, it's gonna be their "Geo-Locate Caller" service: TRON.
  
  --
  Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
Yes by slyguy135 · 2010-09-04 01:59 · Score: 2, Informative

http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002021.html
1. Re:Yes by rednip · 2010-09-04 04:02 · Score: 1
  
  Late every night on TV you find dozens of commercials for 'get rich quick businesses', all of them give testimonials about how quick and easy it was to make money. Do you believe them as well? One should note that they rarely claim to be successful from their efforts directly, just the people who do business with them who make that claim. It's legal cover if they don't claim that they make money themselves. Those other people may lie, but good luck finding them, and they didn't sell you anything (that you can prove in court).
  
  --
  The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
What jerks by Posting=!Working · 2010-09-04 02:26 · Score: 4, Insightful

"Steve Jobs complained to me about what he called "onerous terms" that Facebook had demanded for the friends connection "
I mean, here Apple is, just minding it's own business trying to build an application to replace facebook, and facebook won't give them all their user data for nothing? What jerks. How dare they put restrictions on it like that? Who do they think they are, trying to stay in business after Apple told them it's not their turn anymore?
I don't see any compelling reason that facebook would ever give their friends lists to Apple. Is there even a theoretical benefit for facebook in doing so?

--
This sentence no verb.
1. Re:What jerks by rjch · 2010-09-04 02:36 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  "Steve Jobs complained to me about what he called "onerous terms" that Facebook had demanded for the friends connection "
  Steve Jobs is hardly in a position to be able to complain about "onerous terms" being placed on people. How many pages is the EULA for that abortion iTunes up to? 103? It's over a hundred...
2. Re:What jerks by tiedyejeremy · 2010-09-04 02:37 · Score: 1
  
  ED ZACHARY
  
  --
  Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
3. Re:What jerks by nurb432 · 2010-09-04 02:40 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  I don't see any compelling reason that facebook would ever give their friends lists to Apple. Is there even a theoretical benefit for facebook in doing so?
  They will see the reason once the check arrives to purchase them.
  
  --
  ---- Booth was a patriot ----
4. Re:What jerks by Lars+T. · 2010-09-04 02:52 · Score: 1, Informative
  
  Steve Jobs is hardly in a position to be able to complain about "onerous terms" being placed on people. How many pages is the EULA for that abortion iTunes up to? 103? It's over a hundred...
  The PDF is 79 pages, some of them empty - and that's for the EULA in 18 languages. IOW, nope.
  
  --
  Lars T.
  To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck
5. Re:What jerks by jedidiah · 2010-09-04 03:01 · Score: 1
  
  What gets me is how the terms seem to change every time there's an update anymore.
  You wanna get this weeks update for AirVideo? Please sign your soul away now...
  
  --
  A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
6. Re:What jerks by getNewNickName · 2010-09-04 03:46 · Score: 2, Interesting
  
  Do we even know what type of integration was proposed? I can see a lot of benefit for Facebook to receive additional traffic from iTunes users. I imagine that they wanted a cut from iTunes sales that Apple was not willing to give.
7. Re:What jerks by Cwix · 2010-09-04 04:56 · Score: 1
  
  Im willing to bet there are very few iDevice owners who are not on Facebook already. I see no real benefit to Facebook, they would just be contributing to their own demise.
  Warning Joke:
  I dont know who to root for.. facebook or apple.. I dislike both of them. I kinda hope they collide and their combined mass causes them to implode. /endjoke
  
  --
  You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
8. Re:What jerks by vux984 · 2010-09-04 06:15 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  Try downloading a free app on your iphone. They force an itms EULA on you there too. And yes its over 100 "pages" there.
  100+ pages of eula to obtain a free app is stupid.
9. Re:What jerks by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 06:27 · Score: 1, Interesting
  
  He may be a jerk but he might be right this time: I work for a large company that has a software product that would _really_ benefit from interoperability with Facebook. The feature has been implemented months ago but the lawyers won't let us put it out: the terms Facebook offers are not something we can live with -- without going to details I can tell you it's not a question of money, it's a question of control.
  There are two sides on every coin of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if the situation was similar: the bosses have shaken hands on it already but when the actual contract comes from FB, it contains some very questionable details...
10. Re:What jerks by Stupendoussteve · 2010-09-04 07:35 · Score: 1
  
  Most updates bring new functionality, new EULA is used to cover the terms of new functionality. I do not see a problem here.
11. Re:What jerks by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 10:49 · Score: 0
  
  I do see a problem: you have to agree on the term of the EULA on your iPad to be able to upgrade an app you have bought. You cannot buy new applications if you don't agree to the new EULA.
  There is something extremely fishy there: if you don't agree to the new EULA on a device that don't have iTunes 10 you cannot use the full previous functionality anymore. I highly doubt the legality of this...
12. Re:What jerks by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 13:10 · Score: 0
  
  It's a MUSIC social Network. Show me where Steve Jobs said he is going to "replace" Facebook. His own apps like iPhoto have facebook intergration.
13. Re:What jerks by Posting=!Working · 2010-09-04 16:34 · Score: 1
  
  And what benefit does your product have for facebook? It's their data you want, they can put whatever price or terms they want. Unless your product adds significant value to facebook, why would they give it to you?
  When faced with a seller that doesn't need to sell to you, the price and terms can be dictated by them. If you can't meet them, it's no big deal to the seller. They don't need you to be successful.
  Facebook doesn't even need Apple for anything. 160 million iTunes users sounds great, until you realize that facebook probably already has nearly all of those users who would use a social network. They don't absolutely need anything that Apple has to offer, but Apple needs facebook's friend networks to get Ping off the ground. If they don't like the terms, maybe they should have signed a deal with facebook before they invested in and lauched Ping.
  "No, thanks. Why don't you try MySpace?" would've been an appropriate response to Apple. Going public with your plan to replace facebook and then asking them for their user data - Who thought that was a good idea? Is anyone the least bit surprised that there were conditions that Apple found unacceptable?
  
  --
  This sentence no verb.
14. Re:What jerks by Posting=!Working · 2010-09-04 16:42 · Score: 1
  
  A cash payment from a new competitor for the data they need to be successful? This is like Google selling their search algorithms (not just the search results) to Microsoft. The price would need to be insanely high, or involve facebook getting or controlling Apple's data, too (which seems to me to likely be the onerous terms mentioned.)
  
  --
  This sentence no verb.
15. Re:What jerks by nurb432 · 2010-09-05 02:04 · Score: 1
  
  I meant to purchase FaceBook itsself, not purchase access to the data.
  
  --
  ---- Booth was a patriot ----
16. Re:What jerks by vux984 · 2010-09-05 06:29 · Score: 1
  
  It does when it its presented to you *on your iphone*, which it is.
Dear Apple: by binaryspiral · 2010-09-04 02:28 · Score: 4, Insightful

Please remove the current iTunes codebase from the life-support you insist on keeping it on. Let the craplication die already, its brain is already dead.
Rewrite it, buy another developer, or open the damn platform so someone else can do it.
Ah... by game+kid · 2010-09-04 02:39 · Score: 2, Funny

I see Apple has the machine that goes "spam egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam"!

--
You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
Ironic? by dangitman · 2010-09-04 02:44 · Score: 4, Insightful

It's ironic that the most common scams on Ping right now revolve around Apple's own iPhone.
The author might want to look up the definition of irony, because I'm pretty sure this is the opposite.

--
... and then they built the supercollider.
1. Re:Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 03:14 · Score: 0
  
  Exactly. This is targeted spam, and that's hardly surprising.
2. Re:Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 06:22 · Score: 0
  
  It's 'US Irony'.
3. Re:Ironic? by Stupendoussteve · 2010-09-04 07:36 · Score: 1
  
  Ironically, you're fighting a losing battle. The masses have just drifted too far.
4. Re:Ironic? by lxs · 2010-09-04 08:09 · Score: 1
  
  To help the author here is the definition of irony.
Re:What a load of beeswax mate. by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 03:20 · Score: 0

Maybe you should start your own version of Facebook, just for hookers and johns. Would save the cops a lot of trouble...
A matter of margins by mangu · 2010-09-04 03:37 · Score: 2, Interesting

If they didn't turn a profit, they wouldn't be out there.
True. The problem with digital commerce is that advertising cost is *extremely* low, even more so if they use spambots.
When your cost is zero, any sale turns a profit.
Re:What a load of beeswax mate. by deniable · 2010-09-04 03:47 · Score: 1

Well, now that Craigslist is out of the business, there will be a need.
Re:What a load of beeswax mate. by foniksonik · 2010-09-04 04:00 · Score: 1

Google it, the market is already saturated.

--
A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
Just a comment by McTickles · 2010-09-04 04:36 · Score: 0

LOL Apple LOL Facebook 2 of the shitiest companies GG!
Re:May 1864 by TaoPhoenix · 2010-09-04 04:37 · Score: 1

Join the Confederates Stop Stick it to the Norhern Bastards Stop Free Girls Too
(The historical accuracy of this simulation was compromised by the Lameness Caps filter. To learn more about the Lameness Caps filter near you, write a post that requires large numbers of capital letters. Some restrictions apply. See post error messages for details.)

--
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
Re: TRON by TaoPhoenix · 2010-09-04 04:39 · Score: 1

"What's the Matter, Steve? You Look Nervous. End Of Line."

--
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
Apple has problems with an online service? by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 04:45 · Score: 5, Funny

Apple is having a problem with a new online service? This is inconceivable! Considering the outstanding quality and value that is MobileMe and the unprecedented popularity of iWork.com, I am shocked, shocked, that Apple would have difficulty managing a new online service.
Not just spammers... Imposters too by domulys · 2010-09-04 04:45 · Score: 3, Informative

As Ben Folds recently discovered, some artists have seen Ping accounts set up -- in their name -- without their knowledge or consent.

http://twitter.com/BenFolds/status/22830984597
http://twitter.com/BenFolds/status/22840802922
Most Unfortunate by SuperKendall · 2010-09-04 05:35 · Score: 1

now my erection is never ending (both time-wise and length-wise)
I like being able to fit inside cars and houses thanks.
Perhaps you can have a new career as the words first space elevator support.

--
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
There is a simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-04 09:40 · Score: 0

An incredibly simple solution to the scammer/ spammer plague afflicting netizens worldwide. And this solution can be YOURS, for only $19.xxsakhg;fd....CARRIER LOST ......I, for one, look forward, with great anticipation, to the day the solar flares completely disrupt telecommunications traffic on a global scale.......
Bhanu Tiwari by Anonymous Coward · 2010-09-06 04:53 · Score: 0

As soon as I viewed this web write-up my thought was that Slashdot Apple Story's frequenters really have to comment on this! http://hubpages.com/hub/rent-a-laptop-rentals . I can't comprehend renting a portable computer at all! The fees for renting a netbook even for only a week or two is going to cost you as much as basically buying the notebook!
Bhanu Tiwari