Slashdot Mirror


New Email Worm Squirming Through Windows Users' Inboxes

Trailrunner7 writes "There appears to be an actual email worm in circulation right now, using the tried-and-true infection method of sending emails containing malicious executables to all of the names in a user's email address book. The worm arrives via emails with the subject line 'Here You Have' or something similar, and the messages contain a link to a site that will download a malicious file to the victim's PC. The malware then drops itself into the Windows directory with a file name of CSRSS.EXE, which is identical to a legitimate Windows file. From there, it's 2001 all over again, as the worm attempts to mail itself to all of the contacts in the victim's Outlook address book."

8 of 473 comments (clear)

  1. What do you mean 2001? by Superdarion · · Score: 5, Informative

    What do you mean it's 2001 all over again? I never stopped receiving those. Every once in a while I receive a mail "from a friend", from the friend's address or not, telling me stuff like "Hey, here are the pictures of that party!" or "Have you seen this? I can't believe there are pictures of it!". They all contain links to weird-looking pages which, of course, I never open.

    Sometimes I even receive those mails with URLs that actually contain my email address, like www.thisisnovirus.com/picturesfromlastnight/superdarion.

    From what I can tell, they usually come from my friend's MSN/hotmail's address books.

  2. Re:Apples by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, they tend to stick to windows.

  3. Re:So that's why the UW mail system went down by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Devils advocate here: is there any reason why a normal non-technical windows user should be able to run an executable in a directory they are able to write to? Maybe the ipod/ipad approach is better for most people.

  4. Re:The hell? by drcheap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stupid question from a Linux / Mac user:

    Are there really operating systems in use in 2010 that let you write files to a system directory without entering an administrator password?

    Yes, because people will give a computer anything it asks for, especially if it asks in an ambiguous manner.

    What's this? A UAC prompt asking for permission to "perform the action I requested"? Wait, what was I just doing? Oh yeah, reading email. Yes I want to do that. ]click[

    Same thing would happen if you gave them a Linux/OSX box that asked for admin password. Granted M$ made it easier by not requiring one to actually type in any actual password to elevate privileges.

  5. Lulz @work today by mrsam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Initially, got a few batch of these at $work$ today -- one of the remaining 800lb Wall Street gorillas. The mails originated from some senders @NYSE, and were sent to some internal mailing lists.

    It didn't take long before a bunch of our own drooling baboons clicked the link, causing more mails to go out to the internal lists. That went on for a few hours. Then came the inevitable "why are you sending this", "i must've gotten this by mistake", "take me off the list" replies from more internal senders, resent to the same internal lists. Then came the inevitable "this is a virus, do not reply to all" replies to all.

    I told my management that what they have in their inbox, basically, is a list of people to get the axe when the next round of layoffs comes around. Can't create a more accurate list of people who are truly the bottom of the barrel, and do not belong in an organization that's supposedly charged with with billions of investors' and depositors' money.

    P.S. -- I also thought that this was the exploit for the 0-day PDF flaw too, given the .pdf extension. But if this was just an ordinary executable, that you actually had to click through an extra time to execute, then there's even less excuse for anyone with a brain to get infected with this.

  6. Re:So that's why the UW mail system went down by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Devils advocate here: is there any reason why a normal non-technical windows user should be able to run an executable in a directory they are able to write to? Maybe the ipod/ipad approach is better for most people.

    I have no idea why you were modded "Troll" except that some people have an irrational oversensitivity to any mention of the iPod or iPad. They should get the fuck over it, to be direct about it.

    Back on topic, what you mention is a very good idea. It's also not new to Apple products at all. That's the approach Unix has used for a long, long time now. Installed programs on a Unix system are generally root-owned and sit in directories that are also root-owned. For a normal user, both the executable and the directory in which it is located is read-only.

    The problem with Windows is the vast amount of software that is poorly designed and wants Admin privileges even though it could be designed to carry out its task without them. This has trained the more point-and-drool type of user (the majority who gravitate to this platform) to just click away any dialogs without seriously questioning why a program is requesting extra access. That is, of course, assuming they are running as a non-privileged user in the first place.

    The iPhone (I assume you don't intentionally refer to an mp3 player) approach is more like "you don't need root for anything, let us manage that". The Unix approach is more like "programs don't expect to have root privileges without a very good reason, like your package manager for example". In both cases an e-mail client would be run as a normal user. I'm not so familiar with the inner workings of an iPhone but at least on Unix and Unix-like OSs, the binary executable file would also reside in a root-owned directory not writable to any normal user. Combine that with the generally more clueful user base and it's easy to understand why Unix/Unix-like users just don't have these problems.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  7. Re:So that's why the UW mail system went down by Annorax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, it's more of the fact that "a sucker is born every minute" or more along the lines of every millisecond.

    The college freshmen of today never experienced the "2001 all over again", so they are ripe for the pickings of email bombs that look "old hat" to old farts like us.

  8. Dealing with this mess... by don_carnage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We had to deal with this mess today, running around to PCs and flat-out shutting them off. One user that I came across clicked on the link because he "verified that it was from someone in the office." His Outlook outbox had over 34,000 emails ready to send. Quite a mess and we're still cleaning it up. I thought we had learned our lesson with the "I Love You" virus. What's worse is that the spam filter, IPS, Windows firewall, antivirus, and web proxy all failed to stop the attack.