Nokia Names Microsoft's Elop As New CEO
itwbennett writes "Nokia has tapped Stephen Elop, former president of Microsoft's business software group, to become its new CEO effective Sept. 21. Elop will replace Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, who loses his board seat immediately and will step down from the CEO position on Sept. 20. Microsoft said Elop will leave immediately, but the company doesn't seem to be rushing to fill the vacancy at the top of one of its largest divisions. 'I am writing to let you know that Stephen Elop has been offered and has accepted the job as CEO of Nokia and will be leaving Microsoft, effective immediately,' Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer wrote in a letter to employees late Thursday."
One of the key components of Nokia's current attempt to regain relevance is the (open source) Qt toolkit, powering KDE on Linux. It will be very interesting to see how Nokia under Elop will manage that asset and how Nokia's relation to the Open Source community will evolve.
I for one wish him, Nokia and all ex-Trolls well.
of their remarkable success with mobile devices, especially phones? I don't understand this one. How did Elop manage to distance himself from his former employers failures or did Nokia even notice? This does not bode well for Nokia.
Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
I guess this doesn't sound like good news for MeeGo. But maybe I'm too harsh. If Nokia really wants to be a big player in the smartphone market they will have to continue with MeeGo.
-- Cheers!
The only reason I just bought an Android phone instead of an N900
NITDroid(Android 2.2) runs on N900 just fine, if you don't like the Nokia software, switch.
Thats why N900 is superior platform, it gives YOU the ability to choose the OS yourself instead telling what you can and can't do with the hardware.
There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
relevance?
Article is about Nokia >> N900 is a Nokia phone >> original poster probably wishes nokia went droid hardcore. Nokia makes great hardware. Some people find the software lacking.
But on the other hand, lots of people love the N900 software, given it's nix. So I guess his choice to not pick a n900 is a bit bizarre. I never knew that gps was such a killer app on a phone.
"Google, at least, is giving Apple a run for its money"
Just how delusional can you possibly be?
Google's Android dumped Apple into 3rd place in the cellphone market two quarters ago. And Google dumped RIM into 2nd place this last quarter.
Android was selling at a rate of 200,000 new phones a day/73 million a year a few months ago. And that rate has been increasing at a tremendous rate quarter after quarter for the past two years.
Perhaps you spend your day sitting around in Starbucks, but out in the real world Google is the leader of the cellphone market.
This looks like a troll but it's not. Google "Microsoft master phone" for details. The curse of history is that those who don't learn it are doomed to repeat it.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
Because Nokia is still the largest player in the mobile industry - by a huge margin - since they make just normal phones too. But they also have a big catalog of different phones for different needs, like the N900 which technical persons and linux users must love. They might not be so relevant in the US, but they have huge marketshare in Europe and Asia. The latter one is where people don't usually have smartphones but just normal phones. However, Elop has said his main job now is to help Nokia target US markets better. That is why it also makes sense to hire an American CEO who has been long time in the technology industry.
Now, what Nokia actually needs is to get the usability and things like app store and such correct for their smartphone line. There haven't been any improvement on those things with Nokia phones for years and iPhone, Android and the upcoming Windows Mobile 7 have got it a lot more right. Even tho I've used Nokia phones since I was a kid, I wouldn't consider their smartphones now. That is what Nokia needs to work on.
Holier-than-thou declaring that the mere mention of "letdown" as the main user experience isn't enough for your taste is even less useful. hth.
Still and all, because you asked oh-so-nicely, some tidbits:
- 6310 has a "timer" feature. Not so the e52. Best you can do is set an alarm for a certain time in the future. After setting it'll "helpfully" remind you that it'll go off in N minutes. N being one less than expected based on simple time calculation. Look, that thing has enough cpu power to calculate that sort of thing for me, why can't I put in "now + N minutes" right away?
- 6310's calendar has a "call somebody" entry type. Not so the e52. It has lots of ways to specify the location, but no way to simply say "I want to call that person, that number, then, that time" All the extra fields that it does add loses me the most-used option. Not useful.
And as a bonus:
I used to store SMS messages on the SIM. The e52 simply doesn't let me do that. It won't even show the messages already on the SIM except for the first few characters. There's no way to show the entire message short of taking the SIM out and putting it back in the 6310. Maybe if I moved them off the SIM to the phone first, but that'd mean they get stuck on the e52 and can't be put back on the SIM. GIven that this is the fourth or fifth phone that's held this SIM, that's simply not acceptable.
There's many more where that came from, like how VoIP 3.0 breaks compatability with just about every SIP provider Out There, the GPS unit is near-deaf and doesn't even show what it's up to, the USB cable isn't usable to recharge the thing if it's too exhausted to pick up the USB before shutting itself off again but not too exhausted to show a nicely lighted start-up animation, and so on, but this should be illustration enough to satisfy your bitching.
They could simply continue making featurephones and dominate that segment, and make tons of money doing so.
That's like saying Dell or HP can continue to make commodity PCs and dominate that segment. While it may be true, the statement misses the fact that as the mobile market matures, feature phones will become a smaller and smaller slice of the overall pie. Moore's Law is relentless; the feature phone is dying as smartphones become the standard. There is no way Nokia execs are sitting around a big table discussing how they can use feature phones to ensure market dominance. If Nokia doesn't find a way to take the battle to Apple and Android, they're in deep trouble.
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
This won't last long. Long assignments don't fit by the business profile of the character.
Worst: North American can never ever fit into the the Nordic work tradition and culture. He will feel pretty limited and lonely there.
Conclusion: this might lead to astonishing wins on short term (call it "reorganization") but after that he will leave to yet another challenge.
The battle will keep on between Google and Apple, with M$ as side player collecting reasonably good wins with relatively little innovation.
Whether Nokia communication devices will make it to the 1966 Corvette driven into a canyon by 13 year old James T. Kirk in 2246 remains unclear, as yet.
The guy is nothing but a bunch of hot air. He did almost nothing for Office, he came in after Raikes left in 2008, and it was Raikes who ran Office division so successfully. A monkey with half a brain could continue running this monopoly. They needed someone who knows what to do with the company. Elop certainly does not.
except for the usa . Their only real competition are apple and google... From the usa ... They have been making smartphones for a decade and are looking to get into the usa market with stuff like the n900 and n8. They haven't been able to break the us market so far and i'll bet this is elop's first task .
Deleted