Slashdot Mirror


Intel CTO Says Future Phones Will Sense Your Mood

An anonymous reader writes "Ultra-smartphones that react to your moods and televisions that can tell it's you who's watching are in your future as Intel Corp's top technology guru sets his sights on context-aware computing. Chief technology officer Justin Rattner stuffed sensors down his socks at the annual Intel Develop Forum in San Francisco on Wednesday to demonstrate how personal devices will one day offer advice that goes way beyond local restaurants and new songs to download. 'How can we change the relationship so we think of these devices not as devices but as assistants or even companions?' he asked."

127 comments

  1. can it sense this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have a boner.

  2. Can it sense emotions? by acnicklas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it show calming pictures on the screen while I'm raging at customer service?

    1. Re:Can it sense emotions? by BonquiquiShiquavius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny thing is, I would be happier if it concerned itself less with my current emotional state and more ensuring it just worked as it should. Considering the complexity of emotions and how differently people react to said emotions, I can't see how this could be implemented to anyone's satisfaction

    2. Re:Can it sense emotions? by mlts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, more likely it will call the police when it senses what you want to do to the person on the other end of the line after you just transferred for the fifth time, been on hold for six hours, and have everyone from your boss to the CEO staring you down at your desk.

    3. Re:Can it sense emotions? by modecx · · Score: 2, Funny

      To hell with that: I want the phone belonging to the asshole driver in front of me, who happens to be having a very involved conversation, all the while driving 15 in a 35mph zone, and splitting the lanes of a two way street to feel *my* emotions. In other words: if the phone had pants, it'd activate vibrate mode and proceed to shit 'em.

      If Intel could figure that out, I'd give 'em a high five or something.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    4. Re:Can it sense emotions? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Will it come with a built-in tazer so when I see Bing search come up I can use it on my Verizon rep?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Can it sense emotions? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      What will it do when I get pissed at the buggy software and throw it against the wall so hard that it breaks? Not that I've ever done that of course....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Can it sense emotions? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Funny

      One Intel Tech to Another....

      "Damn, still only seeing only Frustration, must be a glitch in the software..."

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    7. Re:Can it sense emotions? by dicobalt · · Score: 1

      Will it show me calming pictures when I'm talking to yet another upset customer who thinks yelling at me will help? J/K LOL I quit that sucky job! :P

    8. Re:Can it sense emotions? by Cornwallis · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I'm still waiting for a "smartphone" that is smart enough to work as a phone without dropping calls.

    9. Re:Can it sense emotions? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      It shows a wooden doll with a long nose, or as we say a virtual ombudsman.

      --

      Numbers with names. 20/5 a case.

    10. Re:Can it sense emotions? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Yes, of kittens

    11. Re:Can it sense emotions? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't had a dropped call in over a decade, maybe it's not so much the phones, but the infrastructure (or lack thereof).

    12. Re:Can it sense emotions? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      I blame human hands. Stupid devices.

    13. Re:Can it sense emotions? by rainmouse · · Score: 2, Informative

      To quote the article "Future devices will constantly learn about who you are, how you live, work and play."
      what they forget to add is that "Future devices will then sell all this information on to marketing firms, government agencies and your future employers."
      Already my phone beams commercials to me because I want to use, for example the camera flash as a light, something that was until recently a standard addition function of almost every phone.

    14. Re:Can it sense emotions? by wireloose · · Score: 1

      'How can we change the relationship so we think of these devices not as devices but as assistants or even companions?' he asked."

      Add breasts?

    15. Re:Can it sense emotions? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Maybe the phone will be able to sense when I am retrieving a hammer to smash it to smithereens after consecutive dropped calls.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    16. Re:Can it sense emotions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be cool is once the device senses user frustration, it offering to remove Windows and installing Linux on it!

  3. Long Past Ridiculous by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have gone long past ridiculous in what we are having our "phones" do (and why do we even bother to call them phones anymore). Sheesh. A mood phone? I thought mood items went out in the 80s.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:Long Past Ridiculous by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      I'm confused too. I was convinced Microsoft had the patent on feature creep, and I don't remember hearing about them licensing it out to the cellphone companies.

    2. Re:Long Past Ridiculous by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I was convinced Microsoft had the patent on feature creep

      They tried to file for that patent but Uncle Sam had prior art on it.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Long Past Ridiculous by txoof · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here comes Clippy, Cell Phone edition! It's a new extortion strategy. Clippy senses your anger at it's inability to do anything and offers you a sweet deal: $9.99 to automatically shut him off.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  4. Meego related? by aliquis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQCoCnSHq94

    Nokia always talked about feeling pulse and what not. Plus they and Siemens got that TV stuff going and it would be quite obvious they know who's watching that way I guess.

    But maybe Intel is just talking in general / will sell sensors for everyone / whatever. But atleast Meego is still a joint Nokia and Intel (Is it just open-source or open for any player to join in and release their own Meego phones if they wanted to?)

    1. Re:Meego related? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No. You know what is actually related to MeeGo? Vaporware.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Meego related? by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. You know what is actually related to MeeGo? Vaporware.

      Whatever.

      Maemo on old N900: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYnx0PUX7Do
      Intel & Nokia MeeGo video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpUvGMGTDuQ
      Computex invitation for some MeeGo stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8sGtLPYA4w
      MeeGo most likely running on a tablet / atom(?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy6FKpzEDoc
      Similar video, shitty quality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvHULJ864rM
      Engadget video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOs3Zoq8iL8

      I doubt it will happen / most likely is impossible to happen but it would had been sweet if Nokia was willing to share the whole source tree for their phones for whatever tweaks and hacks anyone wanted to bring to it. Or atleast somehow split the "internal" apps somewhere with the public source code and used unsigned firmwares so you could upgrade the OS and still run the applications which the phone shipped with or something such.

      Doubt that will ever happen but it's what I want =P. I won't buy a 600 euro Android phones which may eventually not get any software upgrades :D. If they don't want to sell phones to me then fine, my Sony-Ericsson Z300 and hackintosh works to.

      Was a lot more brands in those videos than I would had assumed. Wonder if we will see the apps over in KDE or that people will install MeeGo on their regular computers/tablets/... to. Time will tell.

    3. Re:Meego related? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Computex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_J5FMXF99I
      Various devices @ Computex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMNU-3t0FIk
      Novell/SuSE MeeGo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r5OOf3Kvls

      Though thread may not be about MeeGo at all. Though Intel and phones sound half-way MeeGo.

    4. Re:Meego related? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      So, you've linked to a bunch of promotional videos saying how great MeeGo will be. That's what vaporware is!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  5. just imagine... by kbs · · Score: 1

    I can imagine my phone ringing and saying,

    "Hey, Kevin, I just noticed you're headed to The Pub. Um, it might not be a good idea to be drinking right after that breakup. Just sayin'..."

    --
    yours,
    kbs
    1. Re:just imagine... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Obligatory.

      Also, here's the specs if you're interested.

    2. Re:just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine my phone ringing and saying,

      Speaking of rings, this is old tech, which you can pick up for a pittance.

      Ah the 70s...

    3. Re:just imagine... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would be the point of that?

      Now what might be *useful* is for the phone to:
      1. Call some of your friends to drink along with you.
      2. Call an escort to cheer you up.
      3. Call a cab to get you home at the end of the evening.

      That way *you* get a fun evening(or at least a better one than sitting by yourself drinking) and the phone company gets to bill you for 3 additional calls leading to

      4. Profit!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  6. Mmmm, yeah by BonquiquiShiquavius · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do not want!

    1. Re:Mmmm, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is exactly what I thought when I read it. Now I love gadgets, and tech - I'm just as geeky as the next gadget-lover...but having devices that sense mood is just going too far.

      I don't want an assistant, I just want a device. I don't want a device that tries to keep me happy. it just needs to work, and it needs to work the SAME WAY every time. if it changed in relation to my mood (or what it 'perceives' as my mood) that would get frustrating very quickly.

      hmmm, tvs that know who's watching? no - all I can imagine is tvs with a sock over the built-in camera.

  7. Anthropomorphizing the damned things by siddesu · · Score: 1

    as "personal assistant" and what not has already started in Japan in full force.

    Here's few of the "your phone is your friend" idiotic commercials from this year:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIIQK1bUQzg
    (the pink body is the phone)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5FIiu7xkcI
    (ken watanabe is the phone)

    There were a few more, all playing the theme "your phone is your best friend".

    I've no doubt this will do miracles for the improvement of the communication skills of everyone - waiting for your phone to guess the mode of the other side.

  8. great idea by monkyyy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "phone call from 'grandma', mood 'horny', press here to accept call"

    --
    warning pointless sig
    1. Re:great idea by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      "Divert to contact: Intel Phone Tech Support Dept."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  9. Features Are The Mind Killer by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Mood is a thing for cattle and love play. It's not for cell phones.

    1. Re:Features Are The Mind Killer by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      It will turn blue if you are calm and red if you are upset. Groovy!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  10. Answer by dissy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'How can we change the relationship so we think of these devices not as devices but as assistants or even companions?' he asked."

    Put me in control of what it does, what info I see, and what info it shares with whom, and I might call it a personal assistant.

    As long as the control remains with the media companies, it is a spam assistant plain and simple, and it's only goal is to aid in selling my eyeballs off to the highest bidder for someone's profit.

    I say the answer is simple, I just don't think they want to hear it or care about implementing it in that way.

    1. Re:Answer by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2

      Like all advertising, it will first earn your trust and make you believe that you are in control. It will then begin to subvert you, changing your behavior, subtly at first, based on the psychological profile that the mothership has compiled. Your trust in your gizmo will cause you to believe that the decisions it suggests are your own, as it begins to influence your decision-making and even your personality.

      Once upon a time there was paperwork involved in being part of experimental studies. In the age of google, the "search/Yes/I agree" button is your consent.

    2. Re:Answer by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How can we change the relationship so we think of these devices not as devices but as assistants or even companions?

      I had a simpler answer, best illustrated by the following:

      Two men were coming back from the mountains after 6 months of panning for gold. After settling up, getting some drink and fine ladies of the hour, they began purchasing provisions to go right back to work on their claim.

      Towards the end the shopkeeper winked at them and said, "I think you boys have forgot these...". In their hands were two planks of wood, which each a hole lined with the softest deer fur. Not much else needed to be said and the two men were on their way.

      6 months later the shopkeeper was laying out provisioning for one of them and asked, "say where's your friend?". The man replied, "Bastard took my plank one night, so I kilt him".

      The moral of the story is that if we want to have a more emotional connection with our devices we might want to start figuring out how to get blowjobs from them. At that point, I would say we would be pretty damned attached to them.

       

    3. Re:Answer by arkenian · · Score: 1

      That's just not why phones have a 'vibrate' mode.

    4. Re:Answer by c0lo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The moral of the story is that if we want to have a more emotional connection with our devices we might want to start figuring out how to get blowjobs from them. At that point, I would say we would be pretty damned attached to them.

      Ah, clearly, I sense a mind of an engineer in the above... prone to generalization from anecdotal occurrences, confident the things can happen in predictable ways...

      I don't have answers, but only questions, illustrated by the following joke:

      The difference between a young kid and an old men: the kid believes Mr Dick is used only to take a leak; the old man is damned sure about it.

      The morals of the joke:

      • generalize and you will certainly miss opportunities (like: tunning the personal assistant to the way old men are still able to feel an affective connection; with an aging population, that's a pretty large market segment);
      • forget to evaluate consequences and you may run into troubles. Like: "since when creating attachment to the personal assistant is a feature for our product? Our shareholders ask us to sell-sell-sell... but nobody wants to ditch our older model they feel so good about".
      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  11. Great by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Just call it GPP (Genuine People Personalities) and be done with it.

    1. Re:Great by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Encyclopaedia Galactica defines a robot as a mechanical apparatus designed to do the work of a man. The marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation defines a robot as "Your Plastic Pal Who's Fun To Be With."

      The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy defines the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as "a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes," with a footnote to the effect that the editors would welcome applications from anyone interested in taking over the post of robotics correspondent

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    2. Re:Great by PPH · · Score: 1

      This will all end in tears.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Great by mavasplode · · Score: 0

      This will all end in tears.

      but at least we'll all know about them.

      --
      ACTUAL SIZE!!!
    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Share and Enjoy! (tm)

    5. Re:Great by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to note that a copy of Encyclopedia Galactica that fell through a wormhole from the future defines the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as "a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came."

  12. awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Awesome, so as I work throughout my day talking to more and more customers, my computer will gradually start showing me gun shopping websites? sweet!

  13. The brand new iShill! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Come get your new iShill today!* We promise you it will only give advice in your best interests.**

    *Message to prospective customers.
    **Message to shareholders.

  14. Not this shit again.... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't we already learn that computers suck at context?

    Clippy anyone?

    That's right I used the "C" word!

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
  15. Beta version only has one emotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    horny. If you are female the phone won't stop vibrating, male it won't stop streaming youporn.

  16. Out of touch by iONiUM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is another example of how C-level execs are out of touch with what people actually want. Nobody wants a phone that won't answer phone calls because it believes it senses you're angry and doesn't want you to say something you'll regret.

    Seriously, we don't want AI in our fucking phone. This isn't the first time I've seen this kind of disconnect, and it certainly won't be the last.

    1. Re:Out of touch by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      ELIZA: You seem angry iONiUM,
      ELIZA:would you like to talk about it?
      ?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Out of touch by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      lol. EXACTLY. Anyways at that point I won't want to talk, I'll want to smash.

    3. Re:Out of touch by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 1

      lol. EXACTLY. Anyways at that point I won't want to talk, I'll want to smash.

      At which point you then have to buy a new phone. I think we've identified the "profit" step in their plan...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    4. Re:Out of touch by Zadaz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if some of these press releases are to just distract from the existing product. "Damn, we're so forward thinking that we obviously don't have any problems with our current product! Look, in the future it will be a clear sphere with no buttons and can wipe your ass!"

      It's the text version of putting bikini models in your ads.

      And most people don't really care. They see this and they go "Intel, hunh? Neat. Next." They don't know that Intel has a very small stake in the mobile phone market, nor do they think about it enough to see the obvious flaws.

      However if they can make phones that have more emotional intelligence than I have then I'd buy it. But seeing that my phone doesn't even have very good spell check I'm not holding my breath.

    5. Re:Out of touch by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      It would be useful if the phone informed the caller that you were angry and offered the caller to go straight to the answerphone. I'm not envisioning this to be mandatory functionality, but I'd prefer getting such a message upon calling someone rather than being barked at. In real life, you can look at a person and observe their mood before engaging them in conversation. This sort of technology could/should be a matter of lowering the threshold for giving someone a call. After all, most of us prefer not to inconvenience someone, so there is a reluctance to call someone in case they're busy. Or in a bad mood.

      Anyways: Application of technology matters. After all, Windows Mobile and Palm were around for a decade and got nowhere serious until Apple entered the arena and applied the existing technology in a better way. Good technology engineers is not sufficient - you also need good product engineers.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

  17. *Thump* by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

    Hi Dave, I sense you're in a bad mood. Would you like me to cheer you up ? *Thump*Thump*Thump*

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  18. ...stuffed sensors down his socks... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can suggest other places for him to stuff his sensors. ...But then, I might also suggest that he get off my lawn.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:...stuffed sensors down his socks... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. if he was doing that on my lawn, I'd tell him to get off it too.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  19. Fundamentally bad idea by gman003 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The good thing about computers is that they respond to the same input identically. If you do X one day, it will do the same thing when you press X tomorrow.

    Part of this is that the input is knowable. I can tell that I just pressed "d", or that I just moved the mouse 2.1 inches to the left, and I can tell by experience what that's going to do. Once you factor in things humans don't naturally know, like heart rate or blood pressure, you get a useless input device, as far as interaction goes. The only uses I can think of are highly-targeted advertisements, health/stress apps, and maybe gaming, since Valve is researching this idea as well, for much different reasons.

    1. Re:Fundamentally bad idea by bouldin · · Score: 1

      This is not always true.

      My car has all kinds of computer-controlled features that adjust how it reacts, and they feel very natural.

      The electric steering adjusts depending on speed, and also how quickly I pull the wheel; it's smooth and stable unless I am avoiding a collision, and then it steers the car more abruptly.

      The car also has traction control, that detects slippage of the wheels and compensates using brakes.

      So, my car has a sort of context awareness that makes it a pleasure to drive, keeps me in control, and has saved my butt on a few occasions. If I went back to driving my circa '97 car, it would feel clunky in comparison.

      Maybe mood sensing could have its uses.. If I tell my phone to shut the hell up, it could stop whatever it's doing and apologize.

  20. awesome by A3gis · · Score: 1

    so as i work throughout my day, talking to more and more clients, my computer will gradually show me more and more gun shop websites? awesome! (tried posting this before but .. well i don't know what happened, the comment seemed to disappear)

  21. Better way to change the relationship by OBeardedOne · · Score: 1

    I know a better way to change the relationship, how about instead of stuffing the sensors in his socks, he stuffs them down his pants. Likely quite a bit easier to sense the emotions of his little head methinks.

  22. Self limiting feature by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    I Don't Care If The #@! Phone Can Read My @#%ING MOOD! It Can Go TO **static*** IF **static*** My Emotions Are ****silence****

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  23. Mood Rings by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Didn't we have these back in the 70's . . . ? Now your cell phone can do it, too!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  24. future users will adapt by Mike+Kristopeit · · Score: 2, Insightful
    when an interface changes results based on a user's perceived mood, the user will adapt to maximize usefulness of the device.

    so which mood does intel want to drive it's userbase towards?

  25. Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Devices will know when they f*#@%ng annoy me right??

    With the way I personifying with devices as I yell at them (part of trial and error in my book) I'd end up on some kind of watch list lol

  26. Personally ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... I welcome the Rule 34 implementation of this.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Mood? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My mood does not reflect the list of things that I need to get done.

    When I can ask my phone, just by talking into it, to schedule a meeting, invite certain people, then comb the news to see if traffic will a be worry tonight, and also send my wife a text message apologizing for being late, then report back when it's done, THEN I'll have a digital assistant. Software has barely tapped the ability to serve us with the input we're already giving it. Adding bio-sensor input and "mood detection" now is just a bell/whistle that isn't helpful to me. It's helpful to so many sales channels of which I am the target.

    Now if we had these "real digital assistants" then mood awareness would be a true achievement. The text apology to my wife would make her smile lovingly while shedding a single tear.

    But seriously, Intel should invest it's billions more into software. Fuel real demand for hardware rather than pimping out yet more bells and whistles.

    I guess medical and fitness uses will be pretty advantageous.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  28. I can't let you do that, Dave by syousef · · Score: 1

    Anyone else getting flashback images of Hal? Or better yet.

    Dave: Call ex girlfriend:
    Phone: Sorry but I can't let you do that, Dave
    Dave: Call boss
    Phone: Sorry, Dave
    Dave: *attempts to smash phone*
    Phone: Let me remind you that I cost over $500, Dave, and you need me for work. I'm also smash proof and you are way too drunk to be effective
    Dave: *unzips fly*
    Phone: I'm not water proof, Dave. It's the 8th wonder of the Universe. No phone ever created will ever be waterproof. But I cost $500.
    Dave: *urinates on phone*
    Phone:No, Dave! Noooo! Mommy!! *gurgle*

    (Can ya tell I'm sleep deprived?)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  29. Bipolar people will need a duo core processor by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    What would be really cool is if the phone could tell us what others' moods are. You could hold the phone and scan the people in a bar, the TSA security actors at an airport, and so on.

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    1. Re:Bipolar people will need a duo core processor by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Yes!!! The Moore law in relation with the market segment of people suffering from schizophrenia (why stop at 2 cores when there is a niche that asks for many more?)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  30. Call to customer care by syousef · · Score: 1

    *whilst on hold to Intel*

    Call center lacky: Hello, thanks for holding

    Phone (in assistant mode): Listen lady, my man Dave has been on hold for 45 minutes. 45 minutes for crying out loud! And he's been hung up on twice and promised a call within 20 minutes that never came. Are you going to quit reading your script and help him or what? Sheesh!

    Call center lacky: *hangs up*

    Dave: Thanks a bunch for your help. Lesson learnt. No more Intel. Next time I'll buy Nokia.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  31. Orson Scott Card... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. will be calling his "Jane"!

  32. Can it sense that... by arekq · · Score: 1

    I hate locked phones and unlock itself?
    Or that I hate the overpriced plans the phone companies are selling?

  33. urge to kill by snookerhog · · Score: 1

    rising

  34. Why change the relationship? by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would I consider a non-living object as a assistant or a companion? It is an object.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Why change the relationship? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. When it buys me flowers and wants to watch a romantic comedy while cuddling on the sofa, then it'll be a companion.

      Urrr, I mean chug beers and watch the free preview.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  35. I don't want a digital companion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a digital brain lobe. But if 'companion' is what they'd call the intermediate step, whatever. I've already outsourced a lot of my brain's data storage to the internet, I find that Google often has *lower latency* than my own brain for certain types of information. I think a good start is powering devices off of human blood. I expect it to be accepted because of convenience and wait loss potential, and once people get used to that, nervous system interfacing shouldn't seem so scary.

  36. Give it a chance by gregrah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are technologies that we take for granted today that would have seemed preposterous only a few years ago. For example - if someone told me five years go that Google was working on technology to predict what I am searching for, and display the results before I can finish typing - my response would have been "I'll believe it when I see it". Now, after using real-time search for a week, I am sure there will be a time when I expect every search engine to deliver results in real time as I type.

    I can understand being skeptical about the "mood sensing mobile phones" being discussed in this article. But to get all bent out of shape about a technology that doesn't even exist yet, and that you will not be obligated to use if it ever is created - I just don't see the point.

    After thinking about this technology for a couple minutes, here's one potential use that I might like to see. If you're driving and listening to music at the same time, and the device senses that you are overwhelmed with information (you're lost, for example, and looking for a specific street) - it could lower the volume on your radio to help you think. Nothing earth shattering - just a simple incremental improvement over my car radio today, which is smart enough to raise and lower the volume based on my current speed (another example of a feature I never thought I needed, but appreciate, and will expect to have in any car I buy from now on).

    I've seen enough negative comments on this subject. Are there any other positive uses that people can imagine?

    1. Re:Give it a chance by jheath314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > I've seen enough negative comments on this subject. Are there any other positive uses that people can imagine?

      There's a reason why the prevailing reaction to these sorts of technologies is negative... they tend to follow a paradigm of making the device "smart", when what most people actually want is for the device to be "obedient". The former tends to take control away from the user, with the device altering its behavior whether the user wants it to or not.

      For example, whenever I remove the key from my car's ignition, the driver's seat moves back automatically (presumably to make it easier for an obese person to get in and out.) The "feature" annoys the crap out of me, and it became even more irritating when I once had stuff stowed behind that seat, which the seat proceeded to crush. I've tried to disable it, but it doesn't appear to be optional. I've had to adapt my behavior in where I stow things to accommodate the damn thing, rather than the other way around. It's not the end of the world, but it annoys me enough that I'd never buy another car with that "feature" again.

      I don't want my phone to predict my mood, or second-guess me, or arbitrarily alter its behavior without me telling it to. I don't want my phone to be my companion... I want it to be my dutiful slave.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    2. Re:Give it a chance by LongearedBat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The summary being... "New features are good, as long as the user can control their use."

      Could someone please mod both parent and grand-parent up, please? They're both good points and I have no mod points.

    3. Re:Give it a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For example, whenever I remove the key from my car's ignition, the driver's seat moves back automatically (presumably to make it easier for an obese person to get in and out.) The "feature" annoys the crap out of me, and it became even more irritating when I once had stuff stowed behind that seat, which the seat proceeded to crush. I've tried to disable it, but it doesn't appear to be optional.

      Just curious, what kind of car is it? This feature can almost always be disabled. On my GM pickup, I believe it was called "easy exit", and was configurable from the "driver information center" settings button.

      Just trying to help... I completely agree with what you've said though. :)

    4. Re:Give it a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your companion cube cannot talk. It served you faithfully and then you incinerated it. Nice job.

    5. Re:Give it a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, a car designed for the common American!

      It remembers me to The homer , "The Car Built for Homer".

    6. Re:Give it a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why you bought the car then. I've never heard of this feature before, but it doesn't surprise me. However, as soon as you said "driver's seat moves back automatically" I thought to myself "now you're going to complain about how it crushes everything in the backseat". And lo and behold, you go on and complain about it.

      I'm not sure how that wasn't an obvious thing to talk about when you bought the car. It's not like you didn't notice the seat moving back after taking it for a test drive. Sounds like your own fault for not doing your research. Because of idiots like you, more cars are going to be made with this feature for fat asses, and I'm going to be stuck with it. Thanks a lot.

    7. Re:Give it a chance by doesnothingwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      incremental improvement over my car radio today, which is smart enough to raise and lower the volume based on my current speed

      It's probably been done wrong unless it has a knee at some speed, increase the volume to legal speed and decreasing above. Driving at 100mph or more I find the radio is best turned off or set to low volume classical music. An alarm that says "too fucking fast" or "have you finished those funeral arrangements yet?" would be better.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    8. Re:Give it a chance by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Thinking with portals? :p

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  37. How can this go wrong? by c0lo · · Score: 1
    From the "Law of unintended consequences" cycle:
    • "You honor, the mood history recovered from the phone indicates..., suggesting a clear intent. I ask the jury to convict."
    • The "social engineering art" (and I do include advertising here - most of the time, it's conning one into buying things one is better without) suddenly get access to another dimension to use/manipulate. Ah, the new refinements possible for Nigerian scammers... just delicious
    • hell, yeah! Behavioral economics/impulse trading and a new feedback loop. The fanboy-ism extended into the world of trading, in which an Intel-based gizmos can influence traders to drop AMD stocks (or Win7-running ones to sell/stop buying Google/Nokia/Apple stocks).
    • high difficulties in pushing new models to the market: people getting so "mood-ly" attached of their "old personal assistant" will impact on the capability to push new models

    Feel free to add.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  38. Star Trek TNG strikes again. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Ultra-smartphones that react to your moods...

    I dub thee the Troi-phone.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  39. If this is anything like GERTY: by tenco · · Score: 1

    do not want. Seriously, this robot/AI was the scariest since HAL 9000.

  40. It would be just like Clippy... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    It looks like you're vaguely aroused

    Would you like help?
    - Undermining the self-esteem of your ex-partner, Jane Johnson? She'll be receptive to your advances when she realises she's getting older and less fertile.
    - I can also vibrate softly.

  41. Danger!!! by karabfak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else see just the slightest bit of danger in giving up your ability to get the content you want and having some device determine what's best for you to view at the moment? Can we say brainwashing?

  42. Intel why be so complex by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    How about a sim safe, any telco ready phone, linux device. No need to do much work, just roll it out.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  43. a word from your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i sense you are angry. would you like to call your ex?

  44. Nonsense by jandersen · · Score: 1

    How can we change the relationship so we think of these devices not as devices but as assistants or even companions?

    A phone is a tool; I don't know about you, but I don't want my hammer to "befriend" me and want to get intimate.

  45. Chitty Chitty Bang Bang by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The title car (in the book, not the movie) behaved like that. It was full of gadgets and whistles, but when it (she?) though one was useful at the current situation it wouldn't (well, almost never) launch it on its own. It just flashed some light over the appropriate handle in the control panel, and the decision to activate the feature was on the driver. Children loved it.

    This is how well-mannered smart agents should behave (and no, a giant paper clip talking about nonsense does not qualify).

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    1. Re:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Entirely my point. Phones have become companions. I'm even over the phone not being just a phone anymore (well I'm not but we're way past that point too), just quit trying to second-guess me. I guess someone would like this, but I definitely would not and do not know anyone who reasonably would.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  46. Any phone of mine that whispers in my ear... by Demerara · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....."you seem a little tense, would you like me to book you a massage?" will be beaten to a pulp and thrown over the side of a bridge.

    I'd like Intel to focus more on power efficiency and less on emotional claptrap.

    --
    Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
    1. Re:Any phone of mine that whispers in my ear... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It depends on what sort of massage it was offering - would it involve a "happy ending"?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  47. wishful thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless the phone looks like Chi(Chobits), puts out, and keeps nosey corporations/governments/individuals out of my business, I'm not interested.

  48. In Soviet Russia... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    television watches YOU!!!

  49. More importantly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we get beyond regarding these people as 'sad fsckers'? Do we want to?

  50. Chief technology officer Justin Rattner stuffed se by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    His PDA begged him to get a pedicure and to wash his feet

  51. so long as it can detect ... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    grr fuck king phone

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  52. Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I sense Clippy will be invading other hardware...

  53. oh great by stoned_hamster · · Score: 1

    now we have to deal with TIS..... (Technology Identifier Syndrome, kinda like when people talk to someone on the phone, only they're only talking to the phone.)

    --
    Smoking cures cancer. Smoking also cures stupidity. check darwinawards . com for some stupid stuff
  54. Programming these should be fun by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    The biggest hurdle to these mood-related responses is that programmers will have to write software that correctly identifies moods and emotions and gives an appropriate response to those. Consider your last call to tech support, are those really the people you want to program your phone to react to your moods?

  55. Sensing my mood is easy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's easy for a cellphone to sense my mood. When I open it, I'm in the mood to make a fucking phone call. Get all that stupid eye candy out of my way, goddamnit, and get off my lawn while you're at it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Mood Sensitive Ring Tones by toygeek · · Score: 1

    So if it can sense my mood, can it play different ring tones based on that?

    That would be cool, because then we could all have Mood Rings.

  57. The return of "Clippy" anyone? by a_resnikoff · · Score: 1

    As a productivity assistant and online help desk and knowledge-base... that wasn't so bad now was it?

  58. Already done by russotto · · Score: 1

    My phone senses my mood by losing its battery, developing cracks in its case, and failing to work when I'm in a really bad mood. The phone makers cleverly realized that being thrown against a hard surface was correlated with bad mood, and programmed these side effects accordingly.

  59. Serius Cybernetics Corporation by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Share and enjoy!

  60. No. by sarkeizen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your thesis may be correct but your example seems moronic. Google realtime search actually doesn't appear to "predict" what I'm looking for but rather just updates my search page while it's idle. Google does provide auto-completion which is essentially an index of your prior searches and some list of prior search others have done. I don't see how an index into a list (or an updating screen) would have been so incomprehensible to you (or anyone) five years ago (especially considering that fifteen years ago the internet was all about 'push technologies').

    Mood sensing stuff is a stupid idea because generally it's trying to model a behavior that is likely far more complicated than it's inputs. Which isn't a problem in and of itself - it's what computers do but what I think is key to making this kind of technology successful is that it is acting on voluntary input from the user from there the user can modulate their actions to get the desired response. i.e. Handwriting recognition became useful when people could change their writing to something the computer could predict reliably (i.e. graffiti).

    Take your own examples...sensing you are overwhelmed with information isn't a "mood" it's a state based on a myriad of inputs, so is being "lost". The computer can look at your heart rate and perspiration but that doesn't tell it you are overwhelmed or lost. Attempting to do so will however cause the computer to change something that you likely didn't want changed and you have to deal with.

    IMHO you haven't read enough negative stuff.

  61. Promises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're also going to get flying cars very soon now.

  62. Do not want! by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Ultra-smartphones that react to your moods and televisions that can tell it's you who's watching are in your future as Intel Corp's top technology guru sets his sights on context-aware computing.

    I, for one, do not want this. I'm already having enough of a time trying to preserve my privacy, and then they want to have half the electronics I have at home monitoring my bodily functions and mood? Screw that. I need a phone that's a phone and a TV that's a TV. I don't need them 'helping' me make decisions about anything -- especially when their idea of 'helping' me is probably going to amount to nannying me like I'm a helpless child. This kind of crap keeps up and we'll have an entire generation of adults that will have been raised without having to think for themselves. Then where will we be?

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  63. Companion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in cruelty,
    Not in wrath,
    The Reaper came today.
    An Angel visited this gray path
    And took the cube away.

  64. I see perfect business logic... by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

    Can't get a dropped call if you can't get a signal in the first place!

  65. My old phone already do this! by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    My phone is 4 years old. Every time I am upset and throw it at the wall, it sense my displeasure and shut off. ~:-)B

  66. Not good by Halifax+Samuels · · Score: 1

    I don't want a phone that can sense how long I sit in front of a computer and browse the internet. I also don't want my boss to sense it, either.

  67. Note to tablet makers by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

    Here's what I'm waiting for:

    -A full sized Android tablet with all the features of the Galaxy Tab. iPad size is perfect.
    -HDMI out for anything the built-in screen displays.
    -USB that allows me to painlessly upload photos from a camera or card reader.
    -***Wifi that will work with Nikon and Canon camera Wifi and Eye-Fi cards - to shoot straight to the tablet.***
    -A gorgeous fingerprint resistant screen, NOT GLOSSY, with lots of pixels, WXGA would be nice, WUXGA would be awesome.
    -Multi-Touch interface that's a pleasure to use.
    -6 hours of battery life is plenty, just include a power cord that's not so darn short.

    How long do I have to wait?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Note to tablet makers by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      Stupid slashdot. Right comment. Wrong article.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!