Slashdot Mirror


Samsung's Galaxy Tab Android Tablet Now Official

itwbennett writes "Samsung held a media event Thursday introducing the Galaxy Tab, and making official what we've already known for weeks, says blogger Peter Smith. 'We still don't have a price or a concrete ship date (though definitely this fall; Samsung says it'll be available for the holiday season),' says Smith. 'It'll ship with Android 2.2 (Froyo), runs Flash, has a 1Ghz Hummingbird CPU, 16GB of memory, a 7" LCD (1204 x 600 ) screen and weighs about 13 ounces. They're claiming a 7-hour battery life. Two cameras: a front-facing 1.3 megapixel, and a back-facing 3 megapixel. It has an HDMI port and will also share media to DLNA devices on the same network.'" Engadget adds some video footage.

45 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Crucial missing information in the summary:
    Amazon UK is reporting an MSRP of 799.99, and Amazon US has a listing for $835.18. Unless is bad info, this thing is DOA.

    1. Re:Price by GordonBX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. The one thing that gets forgotten in the hullabaloo about the iPad is that when it was announced, the prices were significantly cheaper than many people had been expecting, and that this caught a lot of the 'me-too' manufacturers off guard. If the Galaxy is more expensive than an equivalent spec iPad, then not only does it lose out to the 'buy the cheapest' crowd, it also gives Apple ammunition to say: "see: we aren't expensive". TBH though, because of the app-store lock-in, Apple ought to be able to virtually give-away iPads and still make lots of money, so I can see this battle going on for a good while yet.

    2. Re:Price by jcupitt65 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do you mean this?

      http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-7-Inch-UMPC-with-Touchscreen/dp/B001TZVW8E 1 new from $835.18

      That's not the same product, that's a winxp thing with a hard drive.

    3. Re:Price by TechOgre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With a much smaller screen (7" vs 9.7") it had better be much cheaper, like half the price of the ipad.

      --
      We may, indeed, share 98% of our genes with chimpanzees, but then, we share 47% with cabbages.
    4. Re:Price by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TBH though, because of the app-store lock-in, Apple ought to be able to virtually give-away iPads and still make lots of money, so I can see this battle going on for a good while yet.

      Yeah, the specs are interesting, but we need the price to judge whether we might want one or not. That said, I quoted the part of your post I did because buried in the article is a more interesting little nugget: Samsung are throwing in an iTunes competitor through which you can buy and watch TV shows, movies, etc. Now taking on iTunes is a lot more interesting to some of us than taking on the iPad. If the sodding thing has a decent catalogue, decent quality and will let you buffer the movie unlike that bloody LoveFilm site, then it might have got my interest.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Price by jkoke · · Score: 5, Informative

      No buffering, according to this article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100917/tc_pcworld/samsunggalaxytabfaq

      "All content from the Media Hub is offered as downloads over Wi-Fi. There will be no online streaming through the Samsung Media Hub."

    6. Re:Price by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's kind of a moot point if you don't want the 3G though. It's a 170 pounds more for a not as nice tablet and a 3G modem that I don't want. That's not chump change. (For the lazy, 170 pounds is around $260 at current exchange rates)

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  2. Unlike The IPad... by MogNuts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, unlike the IPad, a tablet that is actually useful!

    I'm looking forward to using that Android app that puts anything on screen (everything, not just video) and pipes it out the HDMI to another device, like an HDTV. I could see this being a truly useful device.

    1. Re:Unlike The IPad... by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm looking forward to using that Android app that puts anything on screen (everything, not just video) and pipes it out the HDMI to another device, like an HDTV. I could see this being a truly useful device.

      Doesn't the Archos 5IT do that by default? Plug the charger thingie, plug the video cable to tv and... I think that's all.

      (disclaimer: It might be a false memory for having watched movies with it. I can't test now.)

    2. Re:Unlike The IPad... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      methinks you suffer from an acute lack of imagination and inspiration if you can't do something useful with your iPad. That said, I have a Galaxy S (which shares a lot with the Galaxy Tab) and it's a nice little piece of hardware with a few flaws:

      • Not as responsive as the specs indicate - I eventually rooted my Galaxy S in order to reduce the lagging to a tolerable level.
      • GPS falls out after some uptime. This is supposedly fixed in the Froyo update.

      That said, the Android platform is coming along nicely and I much prefer the Android openness to Apple's strategically founded App Store policies. I just wish you had more imagination. :)

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    3. Re:Unlike The IPad... by samkass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm looking forward to using that Android app that puts anything on screen (everything, not just video) and pipes it out the HDMI to another device, like an HDTV. I could see this being a truly useful device.

      I'm curious as to what you'd use that functionality for besides movies, photo slide shows, and Keynote (PowerPoint) presentations like you can do on the iPad. Any developer can add video-out on the iPad for those with the connector cables, and besides the listed apps some games support it. But overall having the thing anchored to a TV kind of defeats the primary purpose of the device. So instead of just leaving this hanging, enlighten us as to why this converts the device from useless to useful.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  3. Re:bah by quantumplacet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm, there's definitely WiFi, no one in their right mind would release a tablet without it. There's however no WiFi only version, they all have a 3G antenna.

  4. Android? by anerki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what this will do to the development of Chrome OS, as now Android is also a tablet operating system, what will the market be for Chrome OS? I hope they're not shooting for desktop applications ...

    Also, no WiFi as of yet (and as far as I can tell no release date set either). I wonder what this will do to battery life, and well, everything else. Surfing on 3G is acceptable on my phone when I'm stuck in traffic, at home I tend never to use my phone because of the slow connection.

    --
    Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
    1. Re:Android? by I'm+Not+There+(1956) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you still remember the term "netbook"? That's a good use for Chrome OS. Though it will be nice if we could see Android and Chrome OS for different tablet devices. After all, "tablet" is going to be meaning something like "computer," and having different OSes for different tablets isn't that bad.

      Also, Google itself have admitted that Android currently isn't the OS for tablets. They say version 3.0 will be their "tablet-friendly" Android. Maybe that's why Motorola says it won't enter tablet market until 2010. They say they want to deliver a device thats "competitive in the marketplace." I guess that means they can't compete with iPad with Android 2.2.

      --
      "If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it's still a foolish thing."
    2. Re:Android? by yelvington · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 3G model includes wifi. It was demonstrated last night at the rollout with a live video call using Qik.

      The wifi-ONLY model is said to be coming, but the date is not revealed, nor is the price. What I wonder about is how it will relate to the 3G model, as advance speculation has been that the carriers will subsidize its price heavily. The wifi-only version could wind up with a list cost significantly higher than the 3G+wifi version.

  5. Re:bah by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it has to have 3G in order to qualify for the Android Marketplace.

  6. Re:Awesome by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now I can honestly tell the ladies I regularly have 7'' in hand

    Hang out at the YMCA and you can make this true without buying a tablet

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Re:Awesome by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now I can honestly tell the ladies I regularly have 7'' in hand

    7" is below average range's top.

    The joke size starts officially at 22cm (8"?). It's all in the copy of "BE A MAN!" manual that was given to you upon reaching puberty.

  8. On the other hand, iOS App Store doesn't need 3G by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it has to have 3G in order to qualify for the Android Marketplace.

    Here's a citation for this claim. It just goes to boost GordonBX's claim that Android makes Apple look cheap.

  9. What are its dimensions? by nmoog · · Score: 4, Funny

    7" LCD is convenient - but I'd have to know how many sheets-of-glass thick it is before I'd consider buying one.

  10. Re:Soundly Trounces EEE 701 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    701 has a keyboard. I can't see myself coding on a tablet. Also the laptop gives you root access.

  11. Price by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    UK retailers are already pricing this thing at £600+ which gives Apple a nice big helping hand to maintain market dominance. No way people are going to pay nearly double the price of an iPad for a tablet that isn't as good. And I say that as an Android fanboi who can't stand Apple.

  12. memory: ram or storage? by Vectormatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    minor off topic nitpick, but it pisses me off when people use "memory" ambigously meaning either storage or RAM

    in this case i can sort of deduce that this thing has 16gb of storage, but how much working RAM does it have? not entirely unimportant for a computing device, especially when you get into tablet territory (the ipad/iphone already suck at multitasking, or hell, even multi-tab browsing because of low memory)

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
    1. Re:memory: ram or storage? by aztektum · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has 512MB of RAM (compared to iPad's 256MB)

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  13. Re:Soundly Trounces EEE 701 by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

    "but does it have USB?"

    Through a dongle, apparently - and annoyingly.

    "Can I install an operating system of my choosing?"

    It has been rooted already, so in principle yes. Somebody would need to actually port the OS to the device of course.

    "Does it run nmap and aircrack-ng? "

    You can build and run console apps on a normal Android device - it's linux after all.

    "Can I conveniently SSH into an 8 core SMP server with Maple and MATLAB when I need a little extra oomph?"

    Just download an ssh client and off you go. No X forwarding though, as it doesn't run X.

    "How usable is the onscreen keyboard?"

    Tim Bray has been using one for a few days: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/09/10/Galaxy-Tab-in-my-Pocket

    He really likes the keyboard. He also seems to find the battery life to be rather better than those quoted seven hours would imply.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  14. Re:On the other hand, iOS App Store doesn't need 3 by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple did have a huge advantage on price, they could order as many processors and as much RAM as they liked for the iPad knowing that if it didn't sell, they could just use them in the iPhone 4. No-one else has that kind of leverage on component prices, and no-one else has an established cash cow like the App Store. Android is playing catch-up on this, but I expect that Google will sort out the tablet issues soon and the Market will open up to WiFi tablets. It's mainly a matter of them realising that no-one wants to make or buy a tablet running ChromeOS.

  15. Samsung Galaxy S by chrb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what's going on with the Galaxy S? Reports on the web are that the actual GPS hardware does not work, and the "fix" is to use wifi/celltower geolocation. How could this issue have made it past testing and 1 million unit sales before it was noticed?

    On the plus side, the Galaxy S appears to be completely open source. The source code release from Samsung appears to include drivers for all hardware, including the PowerVR GPU.

  16. Re:Soundly Trounces EEE 701 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Battery life is much more than 7 hours. I've been playing with one for several days now and the 7 hours is playing video/multimedia.

  17. Such an Odd Product by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too small to compete with an iPad, too big to compete with the iPhone. And, let's be honest - they're trying to compete with Apple's offerings here. I just don't get their vision of this product. Seriously. It's too big to casually put in your pocket and carry around easily and it's too small to be a "put in your bag" computing device when there are other options with bigger screens available. It might do well - time will tell - but I suspect the screen size puts it in an awkward position that very few customers want.

    1. Re:Such an Odd Product by Superken7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why? The iPad fails precisely at size and weight. I think a 7'' or 8'' tablet could be much more usable.

      If you have ever used an ipad you'll know what I mean: Its impossible to type with both hands while holding it in a natural position, as you would with a phone. You'll have to either put it on a flat surface (which doesn't make much sense because a laptop would be a far better option) or you can hold it in one hand/arm and type with your other hand. And unless you are holding it in your arm or on your legs, its too heavy to hold in one hand for an extended period of time.

      Enter the medium-sized tablets like the galaxy tab. Suddenly you can type comfortably while holding it in a natural position only with your hands (no holding in your arms/legs ) while the screen is much bigger than on a phone. Keep in mind it weighs less than half of the ipad.

      Sure, the bigger ipad screen will be better for browsing, etc.. but the ipad is somewhat uncomfortable for many users in those cases I just highlighted, making these smaller kind of tablets very attractive.

      So I'm guessing that's their vision... I think its pretty good except for the price. big fail there.

    2. Re:Such an Odd Product by MistrBlank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It fails for you, your opinion is not shared with everyone. At it's current size, I'm quite happy with the iPad, anything smaller and I would have been wondering why I didn't just wait for the iPhone4 or latest iPod touch. I don't have the weight issue you describe, maybe people having problems are a defect of the user's physique.

      I suspect once we see market recognition of the iPad, the next model will cut out much of the around screen excess real estate and a slightly smaller screen with the same resolution (making it appear more crisp and clear).

      Regardless, 7 hour battery life is a fail, the price is a fail, the content restrictions they're obviously trying to build is a fail, DLNA is a fail to anyone that's actually tried to use it (I have to consistently reboot my Xbox to view movies over DLNA because of small blips registering files unplayable). And no one cares if it outputs HDMI. No wifi only version, really? Why do we need to be tied to some service for this? Personally, MiFi's and Smartphones with built in access points are the wave for data only device connectivity. No one wants to pay $30-60 a month PER device to give it limited Internet capability.

    3. Re:Such an Odd Product by bm_luethke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for the same reason Apple is working on a 7" one (at least according to rumor sources that have historically been very accurate) - for many people the 10" is too big (I happen to be one of them).

      It's too big to easily carry around in an airport - I'm never going to find a coat, cargo pants, or even most small carry bags that it will slip into (one may find a bag for it, but if so then nothing else is going into it unless you get a fairly large bag). It's bigger than what I want to sit by me at the house just for looking something up on the internet - it gets heavy if you have to hold it for long. But then it is too small for most other things. It is too small for me to read for hours (and therefore put up with the size), it is too small to do real work on so I'm not going to find a large man-purse to carry the thing around in.

      A 7" has none of those issues. I have coat pockets during the winter it is going to fit in and during the summer it will easily slip into any bag I happen to be carrying things in (for truly mobile I have my phone). I still can't read on it for hours or do real work on it, but then I'm not in a form factor I feel I'm lugging around dead weight so I do not care (I have a laptop or a netbook that is the minimum size for real work or reading for hours). It's small enough that I can put it on my end table and not have just it so it can co-exist with the TV remote, a snack bowl, and my drink.

      So if I'm to get a tablet (not sure if I am or not) a 7" version is the only one that does me any good. The main question is going to be price, will they offer similar ones to Apple? We dunno, this one is specced closer to the top end iPad that is nearly 1000 US dollars and people are already comparing it price wise to the cheapest of the iPads (that is also the model you hear when people quote how much an iPad costs), While not really fair that will hurt.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  18. Re:Soundly Trounces EEE 701 by Vectormatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    running any OS of your choosing might be difficult, seeing how this thing doesnt have an x86 cpu, like your eee

    SSH shouldnt be an issue though, even my $99 android phone can ssh into whatever i can run SSHD on, there are plenty of apps for any platform (i actually used my ipod to shut down the fileserver at home before unplugging in a thunderstorm)

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
  19. Re:Galaxy |= LCARS by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I just need somebody to create an LCARS looking interface for it and I can control my imaginary Galaxy class starship.

    Uh... I hope you know that all Galaxy class starships are "imaginary", right?

    Look, I know this is harsh, but they're just not real. Not like the Constitution Class from the Documentary Series.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  20. Re:On the other hand, iOS App Store doesn't need 3 by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I dunno, if it's true (and it seems to be) that you have to have a phone data plan to access the Android App Store, that's going to be a huge impact on the tablet/PDA market. The sales numbers on iPod Touch indicate that while tablet and phones are both more popular, there's a pretty big market for unconnected phone sized devices (PDAs essentially). That's two markets Android is essentially cutting itself out of by making people pay an unnecessary monthly fee. Google needs to change that pronto if they want to get into this market.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  21. Collected specifications by yelvington · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exact specs, what the hardware is, price, where are they releasing it (which countries), where will I be able to buy it (is it just from carriers?).

    You can't even find a Galaxy Tab page on Samsung's website -- they link to one, but it's 404.

    However, specs collected from the announcement, press releases and coverage:
    Android 2.2 (Froyo)
    Flash 10.1 (Web video looked good and smooth)
    1Ghz Hummingbird CPU (Samsung, ARM Cortex A8)
    PowerVR SGX 540 video
    512 MB RAM
    Internal storage unclear; some reports say 16 GB or 32GB
    microSD card slot, supporting 32GB additional storage
    7" TFT LCD screen, 1024 x 600 resolution
    Capacitive touchscreen
    Quad-band GSM/EDGE, triple-band HSUPA/HSDPA, voice and data connectivity
    Dual SIM cards (not sure why?)
    802.11 b/g/n wifi
    Bluetooth 3.0
    13 ounces
    7 hour battery life under continuous movie playback
    Front facing 1.3 megapixel camera for video calling
    Back facing 3 megapixel autofocusing camera for HD video and still photography with flash
    HDMI video output port
    USB (will trickle charge, but not rapid charge)
    Proprietary 30-pin connector for charging and connectivity to dock
    3.5 audio jack; internal stereo speakers
    Accelerometer, magnetometer, proximity sensor
    Full external keyboard, optional
    Automotive dash mount for GPS functionality with Google Maps enhanced for the 7-inch display; presumably this suggests it has a GPS chip, although I have not found anything that says so
    Will share media to DLNA devices on the same network; should interop with MythTV and XMBC
    Will be offered by AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and T-Mobile; pricing and dates to be announced by the carriers
    E-reader software (Kindle, PressDisplay, Zinio, etc.)
    Thinkfree Office software
    Media Hub (cloud-based purchase and rental of video and audio programming) with sharing across your compatible Samsung devices

    Interestingly, "legacy" Android apps designed for smaller screens are shown at a correct size, framed rather than stretched. A bunch of apps optimized for the 7-inch display were shown.

  22. Re:No price? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Really? Because the last time I looked, the Linux version of OpenOffice.org used X11 and android didn't. You'd be able to run it on MeeGo, but not Android.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  23. Telephony by zoward · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Engadget they removed the telephony app from the US version of this (it's still in the European version):

    http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/16/samsung-galaxy-tab-loses-voice-capabilities-in-the-us/

    That's pretty much a dealkiller for me, and gives Samsung an uphill climb if they expect to compete with the iPad, which has a good low end price, an OS designed for a tablet, and an established ecosystem.

    --
    "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  24. Re:bah by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But if it has to have a 3G plan, does it have cell contract with it?

    That, on top of the price, will make it very expensive compared to the iPad, especially the WiFi only version.

    If Samsung is smart, they'll do something like what Apple did with their 3G plans - make them month to month, and a low & high data plan. If not, then this tablet is DOA.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  25. Re:No price? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So you run an X app, which connects to the X server via UNIX domain sockets and shared memory. Then the X server exports its display via VNC. Then you run a VNC client, which connects to the VNC server via a TCP/IP socket on the loopback interface. The VNC client then communicates with the display server via the standard APIs. I guess that should just about work, but it's beyond hideous and will sap your battery.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. Re:USB host or OTG? by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, use of non standard punctuation convention that is less well known than I had thought.

    Use of a question mark after a statement/fact that is clearly not a question indicates confusion and requests an explanation in light of that statement/fact.

    It is a translation of the usage of a quizzical expression from face to face communication to text.

  27. Re:On the other hand, iOS App Store doesn't need 3 by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's interesting point you bring up. All the iOS devices (except the iPod nano which hasn't disclosed the processor) use the A4. Some people were negative on the A4 as it wasn't a revolutionary processor, but I think Apple designed it for practicality. They designed one chip that, while does not contain any groundbreaking technology, can be used for tablets, mobile phones, and consumer devices like the AppleTV and iPod Touch. I do however disagree with you that no one else has leverage on component prices. This is a Samsung Galaxy. Samsung Electronics designs and makes processors (Apple even contracts them to make the A4) as well as RAM. If anyone has more of an advantage it would be Samsung.

    Looking at it now, I think there was 2 reasons Apple designed the A4. The first one is stated above. Many chip manufacturers like Samsung design very generic chips to satisfy as much as the market as possible. Customization costs money and many mobile phone makers use the one that best suits their needs rather than customize it. It is rumored that Apple wasn't happy with the chip in the first iPhone. The problem was it was the chip that they specced out and ordered. Apple probably didn't have the expertise to really design the chip to what they wanted. Thus they bought PA Semi and later Intrinsity. If they were going to customize a chip, they might as well design the whole thing and not just modify an existing Samsung mobile phone chip design. Apple also wanted one that allowed them to use in as many devices as possible, not just for mobile phones. It's interesting to note that the Samsung chip "Hummingbird" was co-designed by Samsung and Intrinsity.

    The second reason Apple designed the A4 was so that they were not too dependent on Samsung. Remember Samsung also makes mobile phones so they are both a supplier and competitor to Apple. Having been business relationships like this before (Microsoft, Adobe), Apple doesn't want to rely on one supplier. If something happens, Apple can simply take their design to another chip maker and have them make it.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  28. Re:Why do Android tablet consistently stink? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because even Google admits that the latest Android (Froyo 2.2) was not really designed for tablets. It was designed for mobile phones. That's why the Dell Streak and the Tab use an older version 1.6.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  29. Re:Very much so by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you for not posting what "LARP" meant and making waste 20 seconds of my life too.

    For the benefit of future visitors,
    LARP = Live Action Role-Playing.

    Other than that, I agree with the rest of your rant.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?