Slashdot Mirror


'Throttling' Broadband Provider Sued In Australia

destinyland writes "Optus has been severely throttling users who exceed a download quota, according to ZDNet — down from 100Mbps to 64Kbps — and it's drawn attention from federal regulators. Optus's ad campaign promises 'supersonic' speeds, and one technology blog notes that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 'isn't happy about Optus' sensationalist claims, which it's sure breaches the Trade Practices Act.' Australia's trade commission called the practice 'misleading or deceptive,' and the broadband provider now has a date in court next month, the second one since a June hearing over 'unlimited' voice and data plans that actually had usage caps."

37 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Title? by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    shouldn't it be "provider" and not "provided?" the difference is subtle, yet profound...

    1. Re:Title? by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's only a centimeter if we're talking physical distance between the keys it takes to press each of the letters, so really, it depends on your metric.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Title? by djh2400 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I type using the Colemak layout. My D & R keys are approximately 3cm apart, you insensitive clod!

  2. They have 100Mbps broadband here? by Nursie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn, where do I have to live to get that?

    1. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh right, I see, any city that's not Perth. Got it!

    2. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by Trentus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm having trouble finding any reference to a 100mb/s plan on either Optus' site or whirlpool.net

      As for throttling once you've used a set amount of data, that's pretty much standard practice... it's not like they hide it.

    3. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by cynyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      really TN? might as well tell him to move out to the bush and install a microwave transmitter...

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    4. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As for throttling once you've used a set amount of data, that's pretty much standard practice... it's not like they hide it.

      I don't mind caps and/or throttling , but only when it is clearly advertised as such. E.g. in my case there is a 50Gb cap, and it is very clearly present in the description of my plan when I signed up for this. Nor was it advertised to me as "unlimited" at any point before or during purchase.

      IMO, any use of the word "unlimited" in conjunction with that is blatant fraud, and should be prosecuted as such.

    5. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by Netshroud · · Score: 4, Informative

      Optus' 100Mbps plan is what they call the "Optus Premium Speed Pack". An extra AU$20/mo on almost any Cable plan, plus a new DOCSIS3.0 modem, and you'll be chewing through your monthly quota about 5 times as fast. Then they throttle you. If you get the more expensive Fusion plans (the 'Unlimited' ones) the throttling speed is 256kbps. They try getting away with that because 256kbps is the minimum speed to technically be 'Broadband'. ACCC, attack!

    6. Re:They have 100Mbps broadband here? by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      As for throttling once you've used a set amount of data, that's pretty much standard practice... it's not like they hide it.

      My understanding of the complaint was not that OptArse was throttling but the way optus had advertised the service.

      Throttling is standard practice, nothing you can sue about there but they have to be honest about it as you can sue for misleading advertising, which as I understand it is what the complaint is about.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Supersonic speed by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the summary:
    Optus's ad campaign promises 'supersonic' speeds
    Well, I'd expect that. I wouldn't like a ping time of 6 seconds per kilometer distance!

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. Title by antant007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the title was meant to be read "Broadband provider that throttles sued in Australia"

    --
    GENERATION 9882463: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig & add a random number to the generation.
  5. Throttling to 28.8 Kb/s. by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you don't subscribe to Optus's "premium" tiers, your service can be throttled to 28.8 Kb/s. From the Optus price list:

    'yes' DSL Basic 200MB

    • High Speed Data Allowance: 200MB
    • Speed Limit if High Speed Data Allowance Exceeded (kbps): 28.8
    • Monthly Access Fee (from 15 April 2009): $49.95

    'yes' DSL Unlimited

    • High Speed Data Allowance: 12 GB
    • Speed Limit if High Speed Data Allowance Exceeded (kbps): 64
    • Monthly Access Fee (from 15 April 2009) $91.95

    Yes, they really call it "unlimited", in the same table with the limits. That table isn't easy to find. You have to go through three web pages, then download several Word documents

    That's their DSL service. Their cable service has similar tiers and terms, but slightly different pricing.

    1. Re:Throttling to 28.8 Kb/s. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, they really call it "unlimited", in the same table with the limits.

      I'm always amazed by people whose frontal lobes are capable of generating and publishing such non-sequiturs without exploding.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Throttling to 28.8 Kb/s. by kaptink · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those access fees are quite high compared to some of the competition. Possibly why they are using dishonest advertising to trick people who dont know or care that much into using them instead. Just looking at broadbandchoice.com.au shows several providers offering 150gb for $90 a month. A bit more than 12gb. Worth looking at this comparison http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc/?action=search&state=any&class=0&type=res&pre=3000&cost=100&speed=512&upspeed=0&ip=1&contract=99&upfront=999999&needhw=yes&conntype=1&conntype=4&conntype=5&sort=0

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who cannot, sue.
    3. Re:Throttling to 28.8 Kb/s. by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm always amazed by people whose frontal lobes are capable of generating and publishing such non-sequiturs without exploding.

      My impression is that salesman, marketing people, politicians, and lawyers are often more interested in the effects their words have on others, than the actual soundness of the logic contained therein.

      If one can claim that their broadband service is "unlimited" to get increased sales, without being overly sued, I think that's all some of these people care about.

      It's evil: they're willing to deceive others for their own benefit.

  6. ISPs, sell yourselves on _service_! by radarsat1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With all the negative press these "limited-unlimited" plans have been getting both for cell phones and internet providers, I would think that a marketable slogan might now be:

    "Due to the laws of physics, we aren't unlimited, but we'll do the next best thing and make it easy for you to monitor your usage and judge how much you are spending on bandwidth!"

    It would be nice to have an ISP that attains success by being honest instead of by lying to their customers.

    It seems the "unlimited" thing seems like such a good sell that every ISP feels the need to offer it, even when they can't actually handle the traffic. What ever happened to not selling things you can't offer?

    (The corollary of SNL's "Don't Buy Things You Can't Afford.")

    1. Re:ISPs, sell yourselves on _service_! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems the "unlimited" thing seems like such a good sell that every ISP feels the need to offer it, even when they can't actually handle the traffic

      Certain words and phrases are simply irresistible to certain mindsets, even when those words and phrases have long since ceased to have any real meaning. They just can't help it: they're so steeped in dishonesty that they don't really see any other way. If the law does come down on these people and force them to fix their advertising, I'm guessing it will be just as painful to these types as having all of their teeth root-canaled simultaneously.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:ISPs, sell yourselves on _service_! by DeadboltX · · Score: 2, Informative

      What ever happened to not selling things you can't offer?

      ISPs are a business notorious for overselling. It makes less tangible sense today, but think back 15 years ago when each customer needed a physical modem to dial in to. Now everything is digital, so they will cram as many users on the same line as they can until it stops making fiscal sense because of lost customers.

    3. Re:ISPs, sell yourselves on _service_! by billcopc · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Due to the laws of physics, we aren't unlimited, but we'll do the next best thing and make it easy for you to monitor your usage and judge how much you are spending on bandwidth!"

      Too many words. People are stupid. Lies work better. I go now.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  7. Re:I see no problem with this by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just looked up their plans. They have multiple tiers, but the AUS$60 plan allows 120GB prior to being throttled

    You can buy upto 200GB if you are a heavy user (with 256k throttle when exceeded). That's still 1/3rd my full speed CATV plan and not that bad.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  8. Re:I see no problem with this by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

    It wasn't advertised as such. They advertise you get 120GB for the cheapest plan and 200GB for the highest plan.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  9. Big deal by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comcast has throttled any P2P traffic - regardless of your plan - into the ground. The FCC has told them numerous times to stop, they told the FCC to fuck off. Numerous times.

    But hey - things can play out different in Oz right? Whatever keeps those delusion flags flying is fine by me.

    1. Re:Big deal by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Comcast has throttled any P2P traffic - regardless of your plan - into the ground. The FCC has told them numerous times to stop, they told the FCC to fuck off. Numerous times.

      Then the FCC should revoke Comcast's license, plain and simple.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Big deal by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ACCC are quite popular in Australia because they actually make companies behave.

      They're the reason you can't enforce DVD region-locking in Australia, for example. (DVDs are still often sold region-locked, but players can play any region.)

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:Big deal by AigariusDebian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called "government regulation". It actually works outside the United States of corporAtions. FCC can not stop Comcast, because Comcast paid lobbyists who paid congressmen to remove any punishing powers from FCC before it even got them. In any normal country, if the cable operators would be doing to Internet what they are doing now in the US the government would step in and either fine them obsene amounts of money (not a million, but something like 10% of their income until they fix the problem) or just take them over and split up the monopolistic companies. So that the ISPs would not be allowed to do any other business but to only be dumb pipes selling guaranteed-minimum bandwidth slices to all willing customers (no bandwith, only speeds). And force all companies that put wires into peoples homes (telefone, cable, electrical, ...) to give access to such wires to any other company that the customer wants, so that you control the last mile and not the company that brings you a service over it.

      It has been done all over the world and it works pretty well.

    4. Re:Big deal by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Comcast has throttled any P2P traffic - regardless of your plan - into the ground. The FCC has told them numerous times to stop, they told the FCC to fuck off. Numerous times. But hey - things can play out different in Oz right? Whatever keeps those delusion flags flying is fine by me.

      Two completely different cases here.

      ISP's in Oz cant throttle p2p connections, they can only throttle entire connections and this must be advertised with the service. ISP's in Australia are dumb pipes, doing any kind of throttling or port blocking without the customers knowledge is illegal. That being said, throttling (the entire connection) after a certain cap has been reached is completely legal as long as it has been advertised (customer knows when signing up for the service).

      This complaint is because a customer feels that Optus has misrepresented their service in their advertising, not because Optus is throttling (in plain English, Optus was caught lying). As other posters have mentioned the ACCC (Australian Completion and Consumer Commission) our competition watchdog is quite popular and does work, albeit a little slowly.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Big deal by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And they tend to come with a sheet on how to unlock them.

      Mind you, they seem to have paid no attention to region-locking of computer DVD players.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  10. Re:I see no problem with this by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the customers desires more than 250 GB, then let him buy more from his Aussie provider.

    If that Aussie provider doesn't want to end up in court, let him advertise what he's actually offering. This isn't about the quality of service, it's about their quality of ethics.

    I live in the U.S., and it's stories like this that make me feel better when I read other stories about countries where you can buy gigabit services for thirty bucks a month. Of course, one has to wonder whether those services are sold under similar misleading terms. I wouldn't know.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. Re:I see no problem with this by Smauler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So their other plans not called unlimited are limited time, are they?

  12. Limited ISPs by kangsterizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    In germany there's an ISP called kabeldeutschland that claims 100mbit down 6mbit up (its cable + fiber behind).
    Except from 6pm to 8am you get less than 1Mbit up/down on every protocol except HTTP. Everyday, no matter how much you downloaded or not (there's no download cap actually).

    Quite sucky and probably borderline legal. They documents only say "up to" of course with no mention of the enforced 100k/s limit depending on the time of the day.
    Their marketing material however, compares their 100mbit versus the 16Mbit of traditional DSL like the best thing since sliced bread. Except the traditional DSL provides 16Mbit on every protocol internet supports regardless of the time of the day, and is therefore much better. (and cheaper!)

  13. Re:I see no problem with this by AigariusDebian · · Score: 2

    That is not correct. The service is actually adretised as '1 Mbit/s' or '10 Mbit/s' service and in such case it is reasonable to expect that I should be able to get what I paid for - such as 1 Mbit per second for the whole duration of the contract (and the 128 Kbit upload too).

  14. Re:I see no problem with this by theaveng · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your numbers are out of date, and here's the latest from that website

    Mbit/s
    11 US/Russian Federation (tie)
    10 E.U.
    9 Canada
    8 Australia
    7 China
    4 Brazil
    3 Mexico

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  15. Re:I see no problem with this by shoehornjob · · Score: 2

    If you paid for 250 GB (for example) and you hit that limit, I think the companies have every right to cut your off completely, just the same as my calling card or cellphone "cut me off" when I run out of minutes.

    People need to stop being petty when they moderate. He has a valid point. Currently Comcast is doing the same thing except they are'nt offering unlimited service (I think their current bit is "the fastest fast"). I'm pretty sure some other ISP's are doing the same thing as they don't want any scrutiny from the FCC. The comment is valid, if they make the limits clear they the ISP is well within their rights to either ask you to pay up or disable your service till the next month. Modded up +2 under rated.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  16. Re:I see no problem with this by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's this 'unlimited time' crap?

    I had cable service back around 1999 and used a NetWare server as a firewall, mostly to play around with filtering ads. Since I had it on 24x7, when the cable company ran a contest and gave a t-shirt to the user with the most hours online, I won. No problem.

    The second month, they gave me another t-shirt, and then asked me if I would mind if they gave a third t-shirt to some other user... Well, I said no problem.

    Third month, I'm the #1 user again, and the marketing department said they had to give me the shirt or there would be trouble. That's when they asked me what I was doing online.

    I told them. They were quite upset, and tried to cut my service off for some BS terms-of-service violation. I threatened to complain to the city and the state, and called their bluff. They relented, but I asked them to stop sending cheezy t-shirts. They gave up on the contest, since I only won the third time because another player/user had some downtime. I found out he was running NTAS, of course. That explains the downtime.

    But despite being 'online' for 720-744 hours a month, I wasn't downloading much at all. They had a contest for that too. I ran a chron job on my firewall just to annoy them. Won that too. Novell's FTP site was also crazy fast, and they didn't notice I was downloading it a few times a day. This would not work today.

    All of this to make a point. 'Time' doesn't mean anything for online usage. Many people leave their PC on all the time, and it's talking at least a little bit always. Sounds like this ISP is just weaseling the true cap, bytes, and trying not to tell anyone. Complete and utter crap. They should pay up. Pure corporate weaselry.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  17. It gets worse... by bertok · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at the plans by Comcen, a smaller ISP that I'm with. Their new ADSL2+ plans throttle off-peak bandwidth down to 2Mbps all the time, even if you haven't exceeded your quota!

    See the plans here. Click a plan to get more information, where it will say "Off-Peak Speed: Speed is slowed to 2000Kbps (2Mbps) during off-peak only". All but one of the plans has a permanent throttle on night-time bandwidth.

    What if you're a professional who wants to sync or back-up data to your work at night? What if you're a techo like me doing after-hours remote maintenance over a VPN? If you're with this ISP, you won't get a choice, you'll be throttled, even if your physical link can do over ten megabits!

  18. Re:I see no problem with this by euphemistic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm going to clarify what the word "unlimited" means in this context (regardless of how it's complete bullshit).

    On an "unlimited" plan, you get for example 50 gig. This 50 gig is at the maximum (theoretically) speed allowed by that plan by the ISP. Should you exceed that 50gig, your speed gets throttled down (or "shaped" to use the weasel word). You still can use your connection to do whatever you want, and for no extra charge, it's just that it's practically near impossible to actually do so when your speeds are cut to nearly nothing. They claim it is "shaped" to dialup speeds of 64kbps, but at least on my plan that is never really the case and I'm lucky to get 15.

    That's what unlimited means, theoretically infinite amounts of data, but only 50gigs of that is at the speeds associated with how fast the technology allows. Nothing to do with time or anything like that.

    Where optus has run into problems is not with the term "unlimited", it's a pretty common term thrown about by ISPs in Australia. The only problem they ran into is by claiming the speeds are "supersonic" indicating they're superfast, when, if you're throttled, they're nothing of the kind. That's it, that's the entire story.