Google Preps Instant Search For Chrome 8
An anonymous reader writes "Google is apparently playing with a nifty integration of instant search inside of its Chrome browser. Typing in the URL bar will automatically bring up a search page, while URLs apparently can be completed much faster as well. It seems as if Google isn't running out of ideas for its browser anytime soon."
I would be worried, as I use Chrome at work, about searching for "po"..."st office". I mean, that term among many others.
There's always increased traffic usage, though I doubt that affects work much. I wonder also if they'll push this on the page where you have to choose a search engine (when you install it). "If you use google, you get this feature too."
So it's going to be like the annoying Awesome Bar that was implemented in Firefox?
"He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
bad excuses to not use chome (I guess I will have to one day...)
Sounds like a not too subtle excuse to send every URL you type back to your targeted advertising file at Google. Were there a separate search box, I'd be less cynical, but one has to wonder if this was always their vision for what the browser bar should do.
Hasn't this already been done in Opera and other browsers? How is this innovative?
I call it 'The Aristocrats'
I love Chrome, and don't miss Firefox at all (and especially don't miss my system being brought to its knees by the constant memory leaks that seemingly can't be fixed), but I wish they would focus less on whiz-bang features, and focus more on filling in the gaps in the core features. Things like "Print Preview" and "Properties" when you right-click an image come to mind.
Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
Wow! More ads, delivered faster!
What a brave new world.
... If I'm wrong, but doesn't Chrome and most other browsers do this already. I've used it several time sin the past few minutes. I skimmed TFA but I didn't see anything new except that page turn button.
Anyone concerned about the privacy implications of Google receiving **every** URL typed on chrome?
Chrome 8? I'm still on Chromium 5 apparently, and it's from this year!
I suppose it is "nifty" for folks that actually like the instant search feature, but I've been happily avoiding it by doing my searches through the URL bar in Chrome. Guess they'll take that option away, too? Oh well, I'm not going to nerd-rage about it like some of the posts I've seen on Slashdot. It's just a minor annoyance to me but I'll likely still use Chrome to browse and Google to search. I really like Chrome, mainly because it's one of the few browsers that's lightning fast when I have lots of tabs with Flash heavy content open. That's probably only because of my aging hardware, and it's not like Firefox is really sluggish on my system, just noticeably slower.
Plus Chrome has other neat features, like when I type the URL of a site I have searched before, you can search that site again by pressing tab, so I don't need to have a bunch of different search boxes for different sites like I do in Firefox. Anyway, I guess I'll reserve my judgement until it's actually implemented, maybe they'll do it in a way that isn't too irksome or distracting.
"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking
Hey! Did you know if you type in your root password into the search bar, it can list your computer in the search results?
It works on Slashdot too... see, here's mine: ********
/ accidentally his password in the google search bar the other day
// it's different now
Instant search is great... for Google's advert mining operations. For me, it's an annoying distraction. If I have any clue about how search engines work (which I do), then the fact that I"M STILL TYPING means that there's more information necessary to find the thing I want. WOrd completion... maybe MAYBE is useful. But trying to jump the gun and anticipate the whole words that I might type? That's a seriously bad idea for all but the most novice users.
It's crap. I turned it off after giving it a fair shake, but it's a solution to Google's problem, not a user problem. If Google's gonna built it into Chrome as a basic feature, I guess I'm heading back to Firefox.
Obviously it is just version numbers, but Chrome is releasing version 8 while IE is still working on 9? I love to see the amount of effort being put into updating Chrome. MS could take a page or two from Google's handbook and offer a faster paced roadmap to IE. Like fixing some of the lingering CSS bugs and adding HTML5 support.
I often use the search bar at the top as a temporary writing area for transient things, like to craft an URL which I would then paste into something else, or to write out an equation that I happen to see (Sometimes I use the browser to review notes)
It wouldn't be very fun if the page I was looking at suddenly vanished to be replaced by a search page, just because I was trying to crystallize my thoughts for a second. Of course I really should be using a separate editor for transient notes but it seems so convenient this way..
I run Chromium as a second browser and it's becoming increasingly irritating. I especially hate the way they strip the "http://" protocol prefix and trailing slashes from domains and directories. A default HTTP GET is "/" not an empty string, similarly most servers are configured to send a redirect from "/dir_name" to "/dir_name/". That's how the protocol works but apparently some shmuck thinks it's somehow useful to hide such details from the user. This from a company whose own web service URLs still use indecipherable query strings at every given opportunity.
This new search thing sounds even worse, generally if I want to search for something in Chromium I visit google.com because there's no dedicated search box. Google should offer a moron mode for people who want google to have their entire browsing history on file. Guess it's time for me to go back to the Gtk webkit nightlies or arora.
Okay, my Chrome pet peeve here.
Let's say you open a bunch of background tabs while reading a page. One of the tabs doesn't load for whatever reason, when it times out, instead of putting the attempted URL in the address bar it leaves some kind of about:blank internal page that tells you what happened. That's great, thanks for the info, now click refresh. Nope, the page is gone forever. Go back to the first page and hunt through the links comparing them against the loaded tabs and hopefully you find the one you wanted.
Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
I love new features! I love new features with an off switch even more!
No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
What is this instant results ChromeRhea? I recommend to everyone to come back to firefox!
This is not new for Chrome 8. This already works in my Chrome 7 right now...
Today, my boss called me into his office to show me the web site of a potential business partner. When he began to type 'virginia' into google, it auto-completed his search with his recent search for 'virgin boy assholes'. I have to go on business trip with him tomorrow. I'm a young guy. FML
Taken from #36396
" It seems as if Google isn't running out of ideas for its browser anytime soon"...
That's true, but they are running out of good ideas.
I wonder what those who pay for their bandwidth in a metered way such as cell phone users or 95th percentile business users think of all the active searching behind the scenes. Despite what many of you think, bandwidth isn't free.
At least Google isn't as bad as Sun.
One day I was on Java 1.4, and then next thing you know, POOF, I'm on Java 5!
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
I could care less about searches.. but because chrome uses the least real estate, it is nice on my netbook... but IT IS HORRIBLE with system resources... I have to restart chrome at least three times a day to clean out the memory. And I only average 5-6 tabs being open. That is really sad for a browser.. that is worse than FF.. and if I could get FF to use less real estate as well, I would just use it and ditch chrome.
If your sick of whining about which new features suck, bloat, missing functionality, then check out a new web browser that is entirely plugin oriented and 100% customizable.
http://www.uzbl.org/
I comes with no features and you can pick which plugins to add or write some yourself. You can easily hook in javascripts, python scripts, shell scripts and you can define/redefine any commands you like.
It's basically an API wrapped around webkit.
Personally, I don't use it. It's not quite mature enough for my liking, but I fully intend to switch to it in the new future. I'm sick of these bloated resource hog web browsers with redundant cutesy-pie features that only serve to annoy.
Warning: only for the uber-nerdy. Plugin collection is small, but growing.
People really care about this?
Put me down as Who Cares.
I really wish they would focus on having the search bar offer good options from the browsing history and not from Google searches. Firefox's awsomebar is the last advantage Firefox has over Chrome, IMO. In FF I can easily get back to pages I use often or search my bookmarks through the address bar and the results are instantaneous while on Chrome searching the history is slow and half of the result are Google suggest results which are just not useful.
Even Slashdot users don't know about CyberSearch? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7931/ or http://cybernetnews.com/cybersearch/ . This has been public at AMO since June 2008 and at their site earlier than that.... Granted, this one really ought to be built into Firefox (like Tree Style Tab) so more know about it, since it's not just a niche use.
One particularly handy tip you might miss about the add-on: type "^" and then your search term to instantly search the site already loaded in the same tab (no need to define a keyword).
They should be working on fixing the Google Update malware so that updates are only performed manually on user request.
GM Called. They want their searches back.
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine