Slashdot Mirror


China Embargos Rare Earth Exports To Japan

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that the Chinese government has placed a trade embargo on all exports to Japan of a crucial category of minerals used in products like hybrid cars, wind turbines and guided missiles. China mines 93 percent of the world's rare earth minerals, and more than 99 percent of the world's supply of some of the most prized rare earths, which sell for several hundred dollars a pound. The embargo comes after a dispute over Japan's detention of a Chinese fishing trawler captain whose ship collided with two Japanese coast guard vessels as he tried to fish in waters controlled by Japan but long claimed by China. The Chinese embargo is likely to have immediate repercussions in Washington. The House Committee on Science and Technology is scheduled to review a detailed bill to subsidize the revival of the American rare earths industry and the House Armed Services Committee is scheduled to review the American military dependence on Chinese rare earth elements."

108 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. I can see the historians now by Cruciform · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And then World War 3 was fought over dirt."

    "Don't you mean land, Grandpa?"

    "No, dirt. But it was extra special expensive dirt. I shot me a lot of Chinese just to get a wheelbarrow full. It paid for your fancy university education. And your radiation pills."

    1. Re:I can see the historians now by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd be shocked over the amount of wars fought over 'special dirt', or shiny but worthless metal, or salt. In any case, if China and Japan duke it out, it won't be about dirt, it will be about a century long conflict (which incidentally has had Japan framed up as the villains more often than China) that was never properly resolved after the end of WWII. Kind of how WWII itself was caused by the never properly resolved conflict known as WWI.

    2. Re:I can see the historians now by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dirt, spice, poppies, slaves. We'll pretty much go to war over anything.

    3. Re:I can see the historians now by biobogonics · · Score: 4, Informative

      "And then World War 3 was fought over dirt."

      When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow.

    4. Re:I can see the historians now by zero_out · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow... you don't want to put a resource embargo on Japan. That has a tendency to cause problems, like Pearl Harbor. Most of Japan's exports require rare earths. Without them, their economy will likely tank. Are the Chinese really this nuts? This isn't war, yet, and Japan doesn't have much of a military, but still. It's like the two were turning up the heat, from 22 C to 23, then 24, and now China just cranks it up to 93. Maybe I'm overestimating the escalation here, but wow... Is this captain really as valuable as an Austrian Archduke?

    5. Re:I can see the historians now by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Them's fightin' words...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:I can see the historians now by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The magnets extend life. The magnets expand consciousness. The magnets are vital to space travel.

    7. Re:I can see the historians now by confused+one · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Japan doesn't have much of a military,"

      That's because it's constitutionally prevented from having more than a "defensive force" of small scale. Treaties signed with the U.S. post-WWII require the U.S. to assist in the defense of Japan if it is attacked. See Defense policy of Japan

    8. Re:I can see the historians now by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow... you don't want to put a resource embargo on Japan. That has a tendency to cause problems, like Pearl Harbor.

      Or Gundam suits.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:I can see the historians now by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "like Pearl Harbor"... Yea that worked out so well for Japan.
      This is really going to push a lot of buttons. Good thing is that rare earths are not all that rare just hard to separate. There are large deposits in Mountian Pass California.
      The US and other nations stopped mining it because China produced it cheaper... Looks like the price has gone way up. Maybe it is time we stopped depending on China for anything.
      Oh and if China decided to wreck the US economy then it wrecks it own. Too much of their wealth is in US dollars.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:I can see the historians now by zrbyte · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes you are a bit overstating, but the point is still valid. This will most likely turn out to be a show of power by China on the lines of:

      "Oh come now Mr. Hatoyama, you don't really mean that. I have you by your balls."

      However, situations like this are a sign of bigger problems, namely that tensions over resources are mounting all over the World. We will have to be very careful to avoid (any more) real and bloody conflicts.

    11. Re:I can see the historians now by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow."

      Only because of Japanese expansionist imperial policy and the invasion of Manchuria made it clear what Japanese goals were in the pacific. And their attack on Pearl Harbor later that year didnt help.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    12. Re:I can see the historians now by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You guys are surprisingly lighthearted over this. The chinese control a significant percentage of various rare earth supplies. They're called "rare" for a reason. This embargo is just anther example of the strong arm tactics the chinese government so liberally employs in their bid to extend their power and influence over the world. Currency manipulation is another way they deliberately try to wreck western economies. They're succeeding, too.
      .
      They are not nice people. China is not "free" in any sense of the word.
      .
      As they continue to turn the screws, expect to spend more for just about everything, which will be extra hard since all the jobs are going to china...
      .
      Enjoy your coming third world lifestyle.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    13. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Part of the problem stems from something a bit different than what you say. For one, aggression is relative, i.e. History is written by the victors. Japan tried numerous times to fit in with the "imperialist" nations like Britain, France, ect. They never were really accepted by the western imperialist countries as an equal. The few times they militarily dominated parts of China, western powers swooped in and told them they couldn't create a colony there mostly because the western powers wanted Chinese goods. The Japanese felt screwed over whenever the western powers decided that they should not in fact be allowed to create colonies when the western powers themselves were in Africa and other places creating colonies. Long story short, the Japanese did not care for us westerners much and saw us as an adversary to their acquirement of parts of mainland Asia (Mostly in China). This is part of the motivation for Pearl Harbor as they felt if they tried to conquer Manchuria again they would be opposed by westerners. This being the case, they wanted to wipe out the US naval fleet so we couldnt react quick enough to their invasion. After WWII, imperialism is pretty much dead and I would venture to say the Japanese people are not interested in acquiring any part of China. I doubt the situation between Japan and China is the Japanese peoples' fault at this point. If anything the history between them is used by Chinese people as motivation to hate the Japanese.

      DISCLAIMER : There are other current economic reasons for the conflict between Japan and China, but I am addressing the "aggression" part of the parent statement.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    14. Re:I can see the historians now by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you don't know a lot of Chinese people of an older generation, you probably don't know just how important a part of their daily consciousness, the memory that the Japanese perpetrated genocidal acts against them, not so long ago. This is a cultural thread that is seldom discussed, yet is central to the social and political thought of many Chinese, with regard to Japan.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    15. Re:I can see the historians now by JordanL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but how do they fucking work?

    16. Re:I can see the historians now by demonbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Japan doesn't have much of a military,"

      That's because it's constitutionally prevented from having more than a "defensive force" of small scale. Treaties signed with the U.S. post-WWII require the U.S. to assist in the defense of Japan if it is attacked. See Defense policy of Japan

      Which brings into question what constitutes an attack. I think most would agree that a strike at Japan's economy constitutes an attack (albeit not a physical one); this is clearly an attack on Japan's economy - does this mean the US is obligated to defend Japan? Or does that clause only come into effect for physical, military conflicts (in which case all China would need to destroy Japan is restrain from actually attacking them militarily, if that is their goal)?

      I don't think this will actually come anywhere near that point, probably the Chinese captain will be put through a quick trial, found guilty, slapped with a fine and deported, and the whole thing will blow over, but we'll see. I'm not sure it is really possible for them to equitably divide the area in question, so this is likely to continue to blow up in the future (not least because Taiwan also has some claim, no way in hell China is going to let them have anything).

    17. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spice?

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    18. Re:I can see the historians now by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 4, Informative

      Japan also has the second largest navy in Asia; China's is larger. There are some signs of Japan building up, including the not exactly constitutional Hyuga class "destroyers" which are in reality small (currently VTOL-only) aircraft carriers capable of carrying up to 11 aircraft. Larger ships capable of carrying more aircraft and 4,000 troops are supposed to start construction in 2011. They sound more like an amphibious assault ship half the size of a Tarawa class ship of the US Navy than a destroyer.

    19. Re:I can see the historians now by es330td · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am pretty sure one of the worst decisions that could ever possibly be made would be to get into a conventional war with a country with an overpopulation problem that is only a couple of hundred miles away by boat. The Chinese could just start sending ships full of civilians to Japan and overwhelm their infrastructure. The Japanese couldn't shoot unarmed civilians; they would have to arrest and detain them. China could collapse Japan without firing a shot.

    20. Re:I can see the historians now by wrook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about the captain. It's about the territory. China claims the islands, but Japan controls them. If China can effectively nullify the control then they can take the islands (and the resulting territorial waters). There is a lot of disputed territory in that area. It could get messy.

    21. Re:I can see the historians now by Unkyjar · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we allow them to build a military, their giant robots will dominate the planet and fighting for the next 100 years. There must be another way!

    22. Re:I can see the historians now by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're called "rare" for a reason."

      You would think so but despite the name they are not rare.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      for China's military to be 10 times bigger than Japan's, the Japanese military (including reserves) would have to be about 20 million - that's 10 times more than the United States can muster.
      But, well trained and well equipped count for a lot (vis. Germany vs Russia).

      China would probably have a hell of a job to invade Japan (no chance of air superiority - the Japanese have no small quantity of F-15s, and the US has F-22s there), but anyone attacking China sounds like an equally difficult proposition - the Chinese just have too large an army to make an Overlord-style landing. The only option would be to pack troops into friendly countries bordering China and roll over the border once they were there, or pack them into nearby friendly countries which have countries who could be rolled over between them and China (which is generally a diplomatic faux pas). i.e. Russia is the only possible country in the first category (though I suspect that they wouldn't be up for it), otherwise there's South Korea (and rolling across North Korea would not be easy), Thailand (rolling across any of Laos, Burma & Vietnam - yikes!), India (rolling across Burma - the India-China border just isn't realistic) or Pakistan (cutting a small bit of Tajikistan, or generally rolling across Tajikistan & Kazakhstan).

      In conclusion, no-one has any realistic prospect of successfully attacking China.

      Of course, China knows this; they also know that right now, no-one has the forces, finances or stomach to start world war 3. In maybe 5 years time, the forces and finances will be less of a problem, and they'd have to rely on merely the lack of stomach for starting a war which will make WW2 look like a playground scrap. Unsurprising, therefore, that they have done this now.
      Or it could just be diplomatic posturing (more likely).

      --
      FGD 135
    24. Re:I can see the historians now by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Magnetic fields do no work.

    25. Re:I can see the historians now by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a pretty silly idea. In an actual war Japan would announce that any such ships that enter Japanese territorial waters would be sunk and if China is crazy enough to still send them it would be their fault, not Japan's.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    26. Re:I can see the historians now by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Japan would sink those ships with little hesitation. China couldn't even take Taiwan because of their naval deficiencies, let alone Japan.

    27. Re:I can see the historians now by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the Chinese the magic words are not "SS and Auschwitz" but "Unit 371 and Harbin". However, today the Chinese are being the aggressors - but only in an economic sense and it's not like they are the first to use the economic leverage they have. What is interesting is that fact that they're using those levers very early on in their ascendancy - which is making everyone else very nervous.

    28. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've tried to parse your post multiple times and it appears to me that you are playing apologist for Japan's actions during WW2 and implying that moral responsibility in part extends beyond Japan and to the west.

      Novel, yet dubious position to take. I think your theory will enjoy minimal support from the Chinese, Filipinos and Indonesians who lived through the Asia/Pacific war and its immediate aftermath.

      The trigger for Japan's declaration of war on the US was the oil embargo, which US put in place many, many, years after initial Manchuria invasion presumably in response to the escalating brutality of the invasion or at least so say the Americans. You say Japan did not care for westerners. Actually, Japan doesn't care much for anyone, as evidence by their behaviour in occupied territories during WW2.

    29. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any nations actions are the responsibility of their government, so I am not saying the west is at fault. I am just highlighting the fact that the Japanese tried to play the Imperialist game and no-one would let them. The British, the French, the Spanish, ect. were pulling the same crap all over the world. What the Japanese did was just like what the British, Spanish and French did. I.e. they came to the Americas and either forced or killed Native Americans so they would relinquish their land. However, the Japanese did this in Manchuria. Not to mention, you fail to consider that Japanese people lived through the war as well. What happened to them? They had most of their major cities reduced to ash with incendiaries (see firebombing of Tokyo) and atomic bombs were tested on them for the first time. I say tested because the US military literally wanted to see what would happen if an atomic bomb was dropped since they still didn't fully understand what radiation does to a human being. Before you say "well, the Japanese performed unethical medical experiments on people so they were worse" why don't you look at the plutonium injections given to healthy people, radioactive iron given to pregnant women, and full body irradiation of US citizens in studies funded and sponsored by our very own government and the Atomic Energy Commission. War is not so simple as "one side is right, the other is wrong". Usually there is a dispute, and then all diplomatic relations break down to the point where force is used. The History of the event is written by the victors. This is why we view Japanese as "evil" and look at ourselves as a having a moral high ground. We have anything but that.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    30. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "co prosperity sphere" angle sounded fair enough; pity it wasn't the reality. I understand that general mood of the Filipino is not nearly as embittered as the Chinese, particularly around the major cities. What I find interesting is that younger generation Filipinos are as ignorant of WW2 as the younger generation Japanese. My experience is different to yours though, in Leyte for example amongst older generations is that bitterness and animosity is still there.

      I am unsure of the aspersions you cast towards the Koreans, yet Japanese appalling behaviour towards civilian population and POWs during the war is well documented. It isn't mere propaganda as you imply.

      If you want to make a fair measure of Japan's attitude towards its neighbours, compare Japan's attitude towards OFW workforce and migrant immigration compared to other first world nations. Japan would sooner engage in absurd pursuits like building $300k per unit nursing robots then allow its society be 'watered-down' by Filipino caregivers.

      I am no lover of American activity in Philippines. I never comprehended complete and total openness that Philippine society embraced US, given US colonial aspirations and the ugliness of Subic and Angeles (never been to Angeles but its reputation precedes itself). But this is off topic: what is being discussed is the morality of Japan's actions upto and during WW2.

    31. Re:I can see the historians now by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obligatory Willie Quote:

      "It won't last; brothers and sisters are natural enemies. Like Englishmen and Scots, or Welshmen and Scots, or Japanese and Scots, or Scots and other Scots. Damn Scots! They ruined Scotland"

    32. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am aware that the Japanese suffered during the war and attacks on Tokyo and usage of the Bomb represent highly controversial issues which will probably never be satisfactorily resolved and I think it is good and important that the controversy of using weapons of mass destruction is aired and looked at from every possible angle even 60+ years later: which conflicts your claim that history is written by the victors because if it was then such dialog would not be occurring.

      But make no mistake, the Japanese were the aggressors here and they engaged in a programme of Total War underpinned with fundamentalist self righteous fervor. They could of brokered truce at any time. They could of chosen not to treat civilian populations and POWs with utter contempt. They, unlike the Germans, cannot claim that they were pushed into a corner in denied opportunity of economic prosperity or national self determination by Allied nations; they were completely in the wrong. Millions of people suffered terribly as a consequence of their actions, including themselves.

    33. Re:I can see the historians now by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was just going to point that out but you did it for me. But upset or not the US bases in Japan are necessary - particularly in times like this, and if the residents near the base in Okinawa are so upset about noise they can fucking move somewhere else. Hatoyama is (was) an idiot and Kan isn't much better - despite the cost a favorable position with the US military is worth it and it's still less than it would take to develop and maintain a national military. Not to mention having a national military would just make Japan a target.

    34. Re:I can see the historians now by hackerjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of the 30s and 40s; they were guilty of terrible atrocities, but that war is over now. You're supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of 2010, who weren't in charge almost universally weren't even alive for World War II and are not acting particularly imperialist or aggressive.

      The point is that most white westerners have similarly barbaric atrocities of imperialism somewhere in their not-too-distant past. Go back far enough and everyone can find an ancestor that murdered a rival warlord's entire tribe; if you believe that what your grandparents' neighbours did should condemn you, we are all guilty!

      Eventually we have to forgive, or at least forget, if we're going to live together.

    35. Re:I can see the historians now by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ohhhh, they minded their own business for thousands of years before WWII? Really?

      You might want to inform the Koreans that they weren't really invaded by Japan in 1592 and part of their country wasn't under Japanese control for years subsequently.

    36. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've tried to parse your post multiple times and it appears to me that you are playing apologist for Japan's actions during WW2 and implying that moral responsibility in part extends beyond Japan and to the west.

      I didn't read it that way. An attempt to explain Japan's motivations is not the same as justifying them, necessarily. Just as one might seek to explain, say, al-Qa'ida's motivations for 9/11 without suggesting that they were justified.

      Meanwhile, you may disagree with the explanation presented, but that's another matter.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    37. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the Chinese the magic words are not "SS and Auschwitz" but "Unit 371 and Harbin". However, today the Chinese are being the aggressors - but only in an economic sense and it's not like they are the first to use the economic leverage they have. What is interesting is that fact that they're using those levers very early on in their ascendancy - which is making everyone else very nervous.

      Well, it's not as though they haven't had plenty of examples to learn from, going back to the British Empire if not farther.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    38. Re:I can see the historians now by John+Saffran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of 2010, who weren't in charge almost universally weren't even alive for World War II and are not acting particularly imperialist or aggressive.

      No, just no .. japanese of 2010 may not have undertaken those acts themselves, but that's no excuse for the denialism of history that's taking place in present day japan. When Tojo's granddaughter goes around saying things like:

      "Japan did not fight a war of aggression. It fought in self-defense," she said. "Our children have been wrongly taught that their ancestors did evil things, that their country is evil. We need to give these children back their pride and confidence."

      without condemnation, that is the responsibility of the japanese of 2010 to correct. This they have not done, which is why the legacy of the years leading up to the end of WW2 continue to plague us. Forgiveness will come in time, but only once the appropriate measures have been taken to atone.

      The japanese of 2010 also have to take responsibility for the ongoing apartheid-like racism within their society. Numerous authors have, many of them japanese, have done much work to document this ongoing state and suffice to say that the evidence is quite damning. When the likes of David Suzuki (the well-known naturalist) goes out of his way to co-author of a book on the topic ("The Japan we never knew") then you know things are bad.

      The best author on the topic is Yasunori FUKUOKA of Saitama University and many of his papers are available at http://www.kyy.saitama-u.ac.jp/~fukuoka/index.html. His opinion is not particularly complementary when speaking of the widespread discrimination against those no considered "japanese"

      The Japanese government did not respect their rights as foreigners, instead they continued to oppress Korean human rights even after 1952, declaring "post-war democracy" whilst hiding the truth. The Japanese should recognize that not only the Japanese government, but also Japanese individuals should take responsibility for the difficulties imposed on Koreans in Japan.

      The largest victims are the Zainichi, but similar oppression was experienced by the likes of the Burakumin and other groups.

      Japan, both government and society, really needs to clean up their act before they claim to be victimised.

    39. Re:I can see the historians now by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I live in Hong Kong, which was occupied by Japan in 1941. Terrible as that was, massacres, rape, starvation; it was over 60 years ago. The "memory" of what happened is not simply recollection of the few remaining people who suffered, but the great mythology promoted by the Beijing government, demonising the Japanese. Admittedly, it's not hard with things like the Nanjing Massacre. But that didn't happen in a vacuum. The Chinese Communists and before them , Nationalists, churned the country into bloody mud for decades in their struggle for power, and killing untold millions. And Mao in the 50s and 60s in his insane Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution killed at least 50 million of his own people. That is something that is simply ignored and never spoken of in China, let alone taught in school history. Yet the memory of the Japanese atrocities much longer ago is referred to daily -- many suspect as a way to distract attention from current or past problems.

      And this current idiocy was triggered by a Chinese fishing boat that rammed a Japanese coastguard ship, and the captain was detained. The islands where this happened have been occupied by Japan for over a century and were never populated by anyone before that. After WWII Japan was forced to give back all the territory it had occupied in Korea and China, and none bothered at the time about these insignificant islands. But about 20 years ago Chinese started wrapping themselves in the flag and calling this a great violation of their sovereignty. An issue that should be settled by low level bureaucrats is over and over again used to tear open the scabs of a war that ended in 1945.

    40. Re:I can see the historians now by jandersen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt the situation between Japan and China is the Japanese peoples' fault at this point

      Hmm, I see. Perhaps you are unaware of the events during the Japanese occupation of China - read up on it, Wikipedia has a several items on this, eg: The Nanjing massacre [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_massacre]. As far as the Chinese goes, they have a lot of very painful memories from WWII, all connected with what Japanese soldiers did in China. The Japanese had a reputation during the war for extreme cruelty - one could almost think they enjoyed doing it. For comparison - German soldiers captured by Britain were treated with some decency in POW camps back in England, and British soldiers captured by the Germans were not too bad off either (as opposed to the Jews in the extermination camps), whereas US and British soldiers captured by the Japanese faced rather different conditions.

      The Chinese have many good reasons for hating Japan; it is not all to do with money. Can one blame the current generation of Japanese for what their grand parents did during the war? Perhaps not, but it is hardly any wonder that the Chinese find it distasteful when the Japanese government are totally unapologetic about what happened and still honour some of the war criminals as heroes. No doubt if China and Japan were friendly neighbors, they could easily find a compromise over the division of the water territories, but as you can see, that is exactly where something is missing.

    41. Re:I can see the historians now by tokul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is that most white westerners have similarly barbaric atrocities of imperialism somewhere in their not-too-distant past. Go back far enough and everyone can find an ancestor that murdered a rival warlord's entire tribe; if you believe that what your grandparents' neighbours did should condemn you, we are all guilty!

      I suspect that people usually don't worship such ancestors in public, don't call them heroes and don't call military aggression "an incident".

  2. Zen Magnets by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is the reason Zen Magnets are out of stock?

    1. Re:Zen Magnets by pregister · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love this quote from the Zen Magnet website. "You'll never put them down for good. Zen Magnets are fun to play with, look good on cute people, go well with deep breaths, and may have health benefits. "

      They look good on cute people. The rest of us...sol.

    2. Re:Zen Magnets by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Informative

      Despite there name rare earth metals are necessarily rare. It's just that China's cheap labour and environmental laws makes mining them cheaper.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Elemental_abundances.svg

      According to this chart Nd (neodymium) is about as abundant as Pb (lead) and Zinc (Zn).

      When you consider the $'s and effort in northern Canada to mine natural diamonds even though you can create superior diamonds in a lab for cheaper, it puts things in perspective.

    3. Re:Zen Magnets by AJWM · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're correct that rare earth elements aren't rare in the cosmic abundance sense. The original name came about because they were first isolated from a mineral only found in a particular mine in Ytterby, Sweden (hence the names of many of them: scandium (from scandanavia), yttrium, terbium, ytterbium, erbium).

      The modern "rarity" issue comes in because they all have very similar chemical properties (mostly lanthanides, plus the rest of Group 3 (III-B oldstyle) of the periodic table). They tend to occur together, and because of the similar chemical properties, are difficult to separate. Not quite as difficult as, say, uranium isotopes, but not as trivial as separating lead or zinc from mixed sulfide ores.

      --
      -- Alastair
  3. Re:Simple answer by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MacArthur said if we didn't bomb China during the Korean War, we'd just end up fighting in Indochina next. Guess what? Indochina was the French Colonial name for Vietnam. Guess he was right. But seriously though, while nuking China isn't really feasible or productive, outsourcing production and relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials are generally bad ideas. Plus, its not like nearly every war in history has been fought over natural resources (to include territory) or anything...

  4. Not quite that clear cut, but important nonetheles by alexismadrigal · · Score: 5, Informative

    We should probably note here that the Wall Street Journal printed all kinds of denials from the Chinese. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704062804575509640345070222.html Me, I'm just annoyed that we can't get a real industrial policy together to support a rare earth metals industry in the US. Got annoyed enough to write a piece for The Atlantic about it: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/09/worried-about-chinas-monopoly-on-rare-elements-restart-american-production/63444/ One thing to watch out for on the rare earth metal tip is that the Department of Defense is releasing a report on their use for military purposes in the beginning of October. Will be interesting to see what they say.

  5. Lead into Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's possible to use a nuclear reactor to generate these rare metals. But, it's so expensive that nobody does. How much would neodymium have to cost, per kilogram, before it would be economical to use reactors to synthesize the element?

  6. Re:what about hard drives? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they'll be 5 dollars more expensive.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In terms of natural resources, Japan is practically void of anything valuable. Lucky for the Japanese, China is still pissed over that whole "Rape of Nanking" deal.

    1. Re:Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My point is--it's not surprising. Japan has always been vulnerable to this. Only this time around, thanks to WWII surrender conditions, they have no hand to play against China (Not allowed to have an offensive capable military.) In the good 'ol days Japan would have just gone to war with them if they pulled this. (They did it to the USA, because we wouldn't trade resources.)

      Just pointing out the interesting role reversal here. That is all.

    2. Re:Japan is a dead rock by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In terms of natural resources, Japan is practically void of anything valuable. Lucky for the Japanese, China is still pissed over that whole "Rape of Nanking" deal.

      China is one of the oldest civilizations on Earth, and at one time had perhaps the most powerful. And yet, after their golden age, they withered and spent the rest of history being what we would call a Third World Country. Only now are they finally ready for world power status again.

      Contrast them against Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country that had to be literally forced at the barrel of a gun to open their doors to the world. By the 1930's... scant decades away... they became one of the most powerful industrialized countries in the world, creating a war machine that conquered a huge part of the globe in just a few years.

      And then we nuked them. They went from world power, to shambles, a conquered country with two radioactive wastes where cities had been. And in less than three decades after that, they became one of the wealthiest and most technologically advanced countries on the planet... again... arguably more powerful economically than they were at the hight of their military might.

      They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves.

      I wouldn't count Japan out just yet.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    3. Re:Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One more needs to mod this post up.

      This is exactly why I think Japan's greatest export isn't DVD players, Lexus IS350's or video games--It's the culture's desire for "Perfection." Everything they make can be done by others...and for far cheaper. The Japanese, however, seek to do it perfectly.

    4. Re:Japan is a dead rock by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...

      China is one of the oldest civilizations on Earth, and at one time had perhaps the most powerful. And yet, after their golden age, they withered and spent the rest of history being what we would call a Third World Country.

      Only now are they finally ready for world power status again.

      Contrast them against Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country that had to be literally forced at the barrel of a gun to open their doors to the world.

      Not quite. China was as advanced an wealthy a country as any in the world up to about 1800 (and far more advanced than most) - that is until the start of the Industrial Revolution. China did not "wither" until well into the 1800s when direct competition with - an invasion by - the industrializing west destroyed its economy and governmental effectiveness.

      Similarly Japan was a wealthy pre-industrial society, and successfully adapted to forced trade with the West (unlike China), shifting to become a successful industrial nation in one generation. Never were they "dirt poor".

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    5. Re:Japan is a dead rock by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves."

      http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/53050/milton-ezrati/japans-aging-economics

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  8. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Me, I'm just annoyed that we can't get a real industrial policy together to support a rare earth metals industry in the US.

    Environmentalists would stop it dead. It involves mining and extraction.

  9. No worries by arcite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    pseudo capitalism is in the process of destroying China from within. As inflation increases, natural resources deplete, environmental catastrophes take their toll, grain shortages increase, and the water continues to run out, well, things will just progress in a predictable fashion. The US need only contain China, which they are successfully doing by forcing them to buy their debt by the billions. It's a stroke of genius actually.

    1. Re: No worries by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pseudo capitalism is in the process of destroying China from within. As inflation increases, natural resources deplete, environmental catastrophes take their toll, grain shortages increase, and the water continues to run out, well, things will just progress in a predictable fashion. The US need only contain China, which they are successfully doing by forcing them to buy their debt by the billions. It's a stroke of genius actually.

      And when China becomes disfunctional you won't be able to buy anthing anymore, because every frikkin thing you buy these days is made in China.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:No worries by Bob-taro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd like to ask a specific question about what you said, but I'm pretty much lost from beginning to end. What is "psuedo capitalism" and how does it lead to inflation, depletion of resources, etc.? In what fashion do you predict things will progress? How is the U.S. forcing China to buy it's debt and in what way is that "containing" China? Presumably, if I can understand all that, I'll see how it's a stroke of genius.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    3. Re:No worries by wanax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I assume what the original poster means by pseudo-capitalism is that there is state control over certain sectors of the economy, and intervention in others (often at the whim of party officials with greased palms). In particular, this means that China has systematically undervalued their currency by ~20-40% against the dollar. This has several effects, the most obvious being that it substantially increases the competitiveness of China's exports (and cost of imports). This benefits a specific group of well connected industries in China, which among others are the mining and dirty manufacturing industries that are depleting China's natural resources and exporting them as quickly as they can. The trade-off domestically however, is that it decreases the buying power of the average worker considerably and leads to inflation. It leads to inflation because to maintain the undervaluation, China's central bank has to intervene in the currency markets and buy dollars to prevent the Yuan from appreciating, which increases the domestic money supply. By having to buy dollars (ie: US treasuries) China is essentially stuck buying huge amounts of US debt as long as it wants to maintain the export edge from having an undervalued currency (which is causing huge domestic pressures within China, there have been quite a few labor riots and urban-rural tension in the past few years). This has two effects on the US: one is that it keeps interest rates low and our debt cheap, the other is that it makes our exports 20-40% more expensive, costing the US at least a million jobs (most estimates are about 1.2m) at present.

      So China is stuck with a dilemma: they can't become a first world country until they let their currency float, because their average citizens have reduced buying power. But they can't let their currency float until they have an economy that is sufficiently robust that it doesn't require a 20-40% import tariff/export subsidy (which is what the currency manipulation is doing), which means developing a domestic market under conditions of high inflation (currently ~8%) and high interest rates (currently 5.3%). And they have to do it before resource pressure (particularly food, water and pollution) overcomes economic growth, while funding a large chunk of the US current account deficit in the mean time. If China doesn't manage that, then both the current government and the economy collapses, and China goes through another cycle of regionalism and stagnation (and if China does manage it, we're probably looking at a world war over scarce resources).

    4. Re:No worries by mqduck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Pseudo capitalism", as used here, is apparently a concept based on the fanciful notion that China is somehow still socialist/communist. It assumes that "big government" is somehow opposed to "free market", and therefor assumes that the combination of the two is some kind of voodoo monstrosity or something.

      Artcite's post is basically sound, but it suffers from that ideological prejudice.

      --
      Property is theft.
  10. All this over a fishing boat by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This has just been the product of one of the stupidest cases of over-reactions of all time on all sides.

    Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain who was fishing off of waters claimed by both Japan and China. Japan refuses to release the captain, so China asks for an informal ban on rare earth exports to Japan for the rest of the month. Both sides are being driven to some completely meaningless conflict by hardliners. China's hardliners see no reason to back down because they want to flex their muscles. Japan's hardliners see no reason to back down because they think they can benefit politically in future elections. And all of this because they can't agree how to settle a case about a fishing boat.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you know a thing about history it's not just about a fishing boat.

    2. Re:All this over a fishing boat by atfrase · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you think this is really just about a fishing boat, you haven't studied enough history or global politics.

    3. Re:All this over a fishing boat by TheEyes · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, the fishing boat rammed the Japanese military boat (there is speculation that elements within China have been putting fishing boat captains up to this in the hope of provoking Japan), so the crime isn't really that the guy was fishing in disputed waters.

    4. Re:All this over a fishing boat by jburroug · · Score: 4, Informative

      You forgot the part where the captain of the fishing boat rammed a pair of Japanese coast guard vessels during the altercation which is what led to his arrest. Note that the boat itself and the crew were released promptly. The Japanese currently have the boat captain held while they determine whether or not to formerly charge him in the ramming. IIRC Japanese law gives them ten days to hold him while charges are pending and if they charge him he will be put on trial and run through their justice system just like anyone charged with a crime pretty much anywhere.

      China wants Japan to ignore their laws and release the captain. Not so much I think because they care about the captain though. Japan is holding the captain for violating their domestic laws for an act committed in their territorial waters. China is throwing a hissy fit because they also claim the islands near where this occurred and if they concede to Japan's right to try the captain in their courts they are assenting to Japan's claims of sovereignty over the islands in question. Of course it would really be a lot easier to just file an official protest with Japan, the UN and I don't know maybe the ICC protesting blah blah blah Japan's actions and then just carrying on as usual. They can still maintain their claim over the islands and instead of looking childish and irresponsible to the international community they look like a responsible grown up nation.

      Personally I'm glad to see China playing their hand so early in the game with this and other recent outbursts as it really gives lie to their whole Peaceful Rise message they try to sell to the rest of the world. Their neighbors and west are finally getting the message that China needs to be taken seriously as a rising power and a rising threat to our interests and not just a cheap place to order walmart crap from.

      Cheers,

      Josh

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    5. Re:All this over a fishing boat by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China itself is a massive country and a few small islands really are not worth their time or effort. The life of the fishing captain is.

      The two hundred mile exclusive economic zone is worth more than the life of a fishing captain to the Chinese government. The precedent of getting Japan and its allies to back down on a territorial claim may be even more valuable than that.

    6. Re:All this over a fishing boat by DavMz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain who was fishing off of waters claimed by both Japan and China.

      Let me fix that for you: Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain whose boat has rammed a Japanese military ship in Japanese waters.

      If you want a bit of history about the Daioyu / senkaku islands, here is an an article in the French newspaper "Le Monde" (through google translate

    7. Re:All this over a fishing boat by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. China has recently claimed a large part of the South China Sea right up to the Exclusive Economic Zones of many of its neighbours (Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam, Philipines). Such claims are contra to the established territories and make those countries very nervous. The fishing boat was considered to be in Japanese territory (at least according to international rulings on the area). The Chinese may feel they have had a bad deal hstorically when the rulings were made, but unilaterally claiming territory currently internationally belonging to others doesn't make you many friends (eg. witness Russia annexing Abkhazia, which made sense to them but was massively counter-productive in the global scheme of things).

  11. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya we need to look in to this. Despite the name, Rare Earths aren't. There are plenty of them. Of course they have to be mined, refined, and all that shit. That is largely left to China simply because China pays people shit and has no safety or environmental standards. However as you accurately note, they are important, we need to be supplying ourselves.

  12. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Get investors
    2) Buy the land in the US with REMs below
    3) Start mining

    Depending on who you know, step 2.5 should be asking the US gov for tariffs on rare earth metals coming from China, to help prop up the price in the US (otherwise, China will manipulate the export price to make it economically infeasible to mine in the US, and then raise prices once mining has stopped).

  13. The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Helps when your government has total control over your ostensibly "capitalist" system. They recently levied some random bullshit charges against Toyota as well, a not so thinly veiled swipe at the Japanese government. Then there is Rio Tinot case where China made sure Rio Tinto didn't compete against a Chinese company by jailing their executives on a bullshit charge. They are also the same market that abhors protectionism and then is protectionist every chance they get. Even during the heyday of Japanese protectionism there were no where NEAR as bad as the Chinese. But of course, protectionism is bad, unless it benefits the Chinese, then its good.

    Japan the US and the EU really should team up to take China to task for all the bullshit its pulling.

  14. Not really over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fisherman story is a big piece of this story, but not all or even half of it. The real issue at stake has to do with some little tiny rock in the East China Sea. It was recognized as an island and part of Japan's soveriegn land by treaties with the US in WW2, but historically has been used by both China and Japan. The fact is, it doesn't really qualify as an island by the international legal definition; it's just a dead volcano with no active life or anything. Just a big rock.

    However, if the Japanese can claim it as their territorial grounds, then what comes along with that is the 200 mile exclusive economic zone, and apparently that area has some of the best commercial fishing in East Asia as well as being suspected of having substantial undiscovered mineral and gas deposits. So while the talk about a fisherman is noteworthy, he's just a pawn, like this rare earth metals embargo is also a pawn, in this game over access to exploit those resources.

    1. Re:Not really over a fisherman by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IMO, the 200 mile exclusive zone is stupid when applied to tiny islets. They should have originally defined the exclusive zone as something like the *lesser* of 200 miles or 10 times the distance from the center of any landmass to the shore. That would make arbitrary little rocks that stick up out of the ocean much less likely to generate conflict.

    2. Re:Not really over a fisherman by DavMz · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was recognized as an island and part of Japan's soveriegn land by treaties with the US in WW2, but historically has been used by both China and Japan.

      Please check your facts

      The island has never been used. It is claimed by the PRC only since 1971, though it is true that it was known to them for a looooong time.

  15. Re:Simple answer by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials are generally bad ideas"

    Erm and do what? Japan has a reallly really high GDP for a country with such a small landmass that is not particularly rich. What would they base their economy on?

  16. Re:Knew it by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Japan isn't self-sufficient in the food area either. I hear they get most of their food, especially rice, from China. I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate). Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan. In other words, Japan doesn't really have a strong foothold to be poking China like this. I guess they have a lot of faith that China will agree to a diplomatic solution.

    More likely though, the bureaucratic head of the Japanese coast guard was pissed off at another part of the bureaucracy and wanted them to lose face. Or maybe he just decided that the last decade-long recession to hit Japan was pretty nice, so he should do his best to make sure the current one lasts that long too by sabotaging manufacturing dependent on those rare earth exports.

  17. Summary and Article Misleading... by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... But not intentionally so... if you RTFA, and I did, you'll find that rare earths actually aren't really rare. So while China MINES 93 percent of the world's rare earths, and thus supplies 99% of it, most countries COULD also do this if they wanted to. In fact, the last mine in the US closed in 2002 because, according to the article, of a radiation leak... seems these rare earth's are usually found with radioactive thorium and uranium. So what has happened is that China positioned itself as a reliable supplier of rare earths, and did so cheaply. Although the article doesn't say this, my guess is that China probably doesn't take the same safety precautions with mines and the thorium, which the article did say was costly to dispose of.

    What has happened here is that China, again, produces things in an environmentally unfriendly way (since they apparently don't care much about the cost of crapping on their own country), and thus does so with cheap labor, thus becoming the most economically viable producer. Only now do they start to flex that muscle they have built...

    So the world has a few choices - they can continue to rely on China, and deal with politically induced supply disruptions, find other countries that are willing to cheaply crap on their own environments and buy from them, or produce such materials locally but at much higher cost.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    1. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by AfroTrance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What has happened here is that China, again, produces things in an environmentally unfriendly way (since they apparently don't care much about the cost of crapping on their own country), and thus does so with cheap labor, thus becoming the most economically viable producer.

      China doesn't care about being "economically viable" with things like this. I'm sure that when they flooded the market with REE, therefore reducing the price, therefore causing other mines to become uneconomic, that they were operating at a loss.

      After all, most of the businesses within China are state owned. State owned enterprise does not need to return a profit to the share holders.

  18. Subsidize mining industry? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is so damn typical. Congress passes a law that has negative consequences so they pass another law to try to fix the consequences. Congress is responsible for the decline of rare earth mines in the first place. For example, a good junk of the Mojave was home to several rare-earth mines that were put out of business when Senator Feinstein pushed through the Desert Wilderness Protection act.

      Solar farms are out of luck when they try to site in the Mojave for the same reason - Feinstein has blocked off huge chunks of land.

    Instead of subsidizing mining, perhaps repealing Senator Feinstein's handiwork would be a good place to start.

  19. Future production by AfroTrance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mt Weld mine in Australia is under construction. They claim to be able to supply 20% of global production. The Mountain Pass mine is to re-open next year as well.

  20. Go Fe16N2! by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll sure be happy when the figure out how to grow mass quantities of Fe16N2 crystals to make even stronger magnets so we can forget about rare-earth.

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  21. Re:I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
  22. US sources coming back on line by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was covered in the Economist last week.

    The US has some of the largest deposits of rare earths in the world. One big location is Mountain Pass, California. The mine there was closed in 2002, because it wasn't competitive with the China price. (Or with China's mining with a complete lack of environmental controls.)

    The Mountain Pass mine is being reopened under new management. In a few years, this problem will be over.

    The problem with rare-earth mining is that, since the materials are rare, the waste problem is huge. The early stages of extractoin are messy. Big acid lakes, things like that.

  23. Re:I can see the viagra now by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny

    No one's fought a war over sex yet.

    Speak for yourself.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  24. Mining is inherently boom or bust by mschaffer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, they're looking to subsidize the revival of the American rare earths industry?
    It's not like it will evaporate out of the ground if we aren't mining it. There's no need to destroy the environment with unnecessary mining and waste money for digging's sake.
    If the price goes up, we'll just start digging again. Just like every other mining cycle.

  25. Typical bad policy by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the rare earth supply dries up, the open market price will rise and mining these domestically will happen because it's economically sensible to do so. There's no reason to subsidize anything, Congress. Just get out of the way and let the market work.

  26. Re:what about hard drives? by TheEyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because they're made out of silicon and gold, both of which are plentiful (we have enough gold already mined to last 100 years, if everyone would stop hoarding it in silly attempts to create yet another bubble.)

  27. Can they do it? by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought this kind of embargo would cause all sorts of sanctions from WTO members, and that China wasn't supposed to do this as a signatory of various WTO trade agreements.

    I'm getting a bit annoyed at China's constant attempts at having their pie and eating it. But I guess they can get away with this - after all, way too many countries have their balls squeezed by China.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Can they do it? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm afraid the analogy you gave is wrong. The territory is "claimed by China" but "internationally recognized as belong to Japan". This is not the same situation you attempted to outline (seizing citizens on their sovereign territory is not the same as seizing someone else's citizens that are on your sovereign territory). That is why the Japanese had the legal power to do what they did. "Claiming" something is meaningless and doesn't make it yours until all the countries in the world agree with you.

  28. Cold War Titanium by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bulk of the USA's titanium during the cold war came from Russia. They bought it through fake companies and then used it on the very spy planes that they used to spy on them. I always rather enjoyed that little bit of information.

  29. Re:I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indeed, a thousand ships were launched when King Menelaus discovered that he had run out of condoms.

    The greatest warrior on either side was Achilles, who was completely invulnerable everywhere except his heel. According to Homer, he slew Hector in a single blow with his unsheathed manhood.

    We can thank the Trojan War for incredible advances in chemistry. Many important new developments were made in latex technology, due to the Greeks' need to properly protect the Trojan Horse.

    Helen of Troy, ironically, and anachronistically, had syphilis.

  30. Re:For once I am glad... by treeves · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should continue to be worried.
    There are a lot of things that *go into* electronics (components, among which ICs are the most profitable) or are used to *make* electronic components but you're right most of the *assembly* doesn't take place in Japan.
    Nikon (not just cameras), Hitachi, Fujitsu, Renesas, NEC, Canon (again, not just cameras), Shimadzu, (a few off the top off my head - and I'm tired so I'm leaving off a bunch) most of the companies listed here. And a lot of them make things *in Japan*.
    And then there's the specialty chemical companies.
    China does have some dependencies on Japan as well, although admittedly that has shifted a lot the other way.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  31. Re:Knew it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate).

    Urban Japan, at least. In the smaller towns it's still quite common to farm your own rice. The smallish (population around 23,000) town I stayed in was surrounded by rice paddies. Apparently there were a couple of weeks when everything else in the town stopped as everyone went out to either plant or harvest rice. Pretty much every family owned at least one (smallish) field, which grew the majority of the rice that they ate. I'm sure India would love to sell them a lot more food, if China wanted to stop...

    Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan

    The USA has treaty obligations towards Japan that make declaring war on Japan equivalent to declaring war on the USA. Even North Korea isn't that stupid.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. Take that by nerdin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The world should simply accepte that there's a new Master and no longer is called USA.

  33. Re:I can see the viagra now by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's not true... I'm constantly at war with myself.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  34. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Funny

    3 is supposed to be "profit!!" and you have no question marks. Are you a business major or something?

  35. Re:Simple answer by oldhack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasabi.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  36. Re:Knew it by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Japan isn't self-sufficient in the food area either. I hear they get most of their food, especially rice, from China. I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate). Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan. In other words, Japan doesn't really have a strong foothold to be poking China like this. I guess they have a lot of faith that China will agree to a diplomatic solution.

    More likely though, the bureaucratic head of the Japanese coast guard was pissed off at another part of the bureaucracy and wanted them to lose face. Or maybe he just decided that the last decade-long recession to hit Japan was pretty nice, so he should do his best to make sure the current one lasts that long too by sabotaging manufacturing dependent on those rare earth exports.

    Japan grows about 10% more rice than it consumes. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice#Production_and_export.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  37. Re:Knew it by wrook · · Score: 2, Informative

    All rice sold in Japan is domestic. Japan buys rice from the US (due to a trade agreement), but dumps it (also known as "stockpiling", but it is *never* used and is generally not allowed to be sold). Last year there was a shortage of rice in south east Asia, so the Japanese asked for and got permission to sell some of their stockpile in Asia. Supermarkets label the origin of almost all food in Japan, so I can tell you that Chinese imports make up a large volume of non-staple foods. The vast majority of food imported from China (based on reading labels in the supermarket) is frozen vegetables, mushrooms, pickles and seaweed. If the Chinese were to stop exportation of food to Japan tomorrow, it would definitely have an impact, but not starvation.

    Japan actually has a law on the books that disallows importation of staple foods into the country. It was put in place after WWII when many many people starved to death due to US blockades. Having said that, Japan is nowhere near self sufficient for food as lately they have relaxed their importation policies (due to heavy lobbying by the US).

  38. Restricting Exports ineffective by Aaron+Denney · · Score: 2, Informative

    This shouldn't be called an "embargo". They're not preventing anyone else from trading with Japan, only their own nationals, and only rare earths. It's a very very narrowly targetted export ban. The problem is, it can't be effective. Someone else buys a little more in China, sells it to someone else who sells it to someone else who sells it to someone in Japan. It's fungible.

  39. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't be too sure of that mine reopening. If China's state run economy has proved one thing it's that the free-market unmanaged economies of the West will time and again fail to even comprehend the forces arrayed against them. Narrow minded "Market Based" thinking is exactly what got us into this single supplier problem and naively thinking it will get us out is well... naive.

    Whatever you think the "free-market" will do to get us out of this mess, the Chinese economic mega-complex has already considered three moves in advance and is working to counter it. People don't seem to understand that China-Inc is essentially the world greatest ever hyper-corporation: millions of companies, thousands of major corporations, and hundreds of banks all working under one overall direction and policy. Just about every trick you'd expect a major-corporation to pull can and has been considered, strategised and implemented by the this acutely self aware market entity.

    Before anyone begins, this isn't some kind of bigoted post. What's really going on here is that the Chinese Communist Party has developed(invented really) a state controlled, capitalism driven, centrally managed and wholly unified economy; and it's as powerful an apparatus as you'd expect. It's one of the biggest civil and economic developments in world history. And if you expect this electric dragon--a vast, powerful and above all self aware economy under the control of a central brain--to act like your traditionally lauded free market fungus-like economies--efficient, large or small, but hopelessly undirected and prone to bottom feeding-- you are mistaken from the very outset. The Communist Party does not wait for startups, demand, financiers, or any other "market forces" to act. They order entire economic sectors to be created, dismantled and transformed overnight. And it has made them the richest country in the world.

    That's what the Japanese are facing here, and that's what the rest of the world is going to have to face up to as well. If you think a little mine in a mountain pass is going to change things, then you're just another free market crazy barking at the invisible hand of the moon.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  40. Re:Knew it by vakuona · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Food self sufficiency is sometimes a misleading statistic. Sometimes it's just cheaper to import. I am sure Japan could get that figure closer to 100% if they had to. Heck, I am sure China wasn't exporting them food during WW2.

    If China embargoes food exports to Japan, I am sure many other countries would also willingly step into the breach. Argentina, Brazil, Russia, heck, USA are waiting in the wings.

    And not to forget that Japan probably consumes much more food than it really needs to. Developed countries are surprisingly wasteful when it comes to food consumption. I think in the UK, about 30-40% of food is actually thrown away. In a crisis situation, with food prices rising, people will be less likely to waste it.

  41. Not a dispute over a fisherman by turkeyfish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not a dispute over a fisherman. It is a territorial dispute over a very large chunk of water around a disputed island. It is also an opportunity for China to put pressure on Japan and indirectly on the US (which relies on Japanese to manufacture many critical industrial components, many military in nature that can no longer be manufactured in the US because the US is no longer economically competitive in many high-tech industrial technologies. China sees this as an opportunity to exert its growing economic influence at a time that the West is not economically or politically able to respond because it is bogged down in two land wars in Central Asia. They are sending a signal that they are now the dominant power in Asia and the rest of the world can expect them to be the dominant economy in the world in just 10-15 years time at current rates of growth. This will almost certainly happen sooner as the republicans who look as if they are about to come into power are determined to shrink the US government, which will almost certainly speed up the difference in infrastructure and military preparedness. If we get into it with Iran, expect the Chinese who rely heavily on Iranian oil to come into more direct conflict with the US, probably by igniting inflation in the US by pulling their underwriting of US debt instruments that are all that is propping up the US financial system presently.

    If the China Japan situation escalates our treaty obligations will draw us into it. Its unclear how the US will fare being so dependent on middle eastern oil, which can be easily shut off at the Straits of Hormuz by the Iranians and its military highly dependent on satellites for its battlefield and tactical awareness. The strategic petroleum reserve won't last long in an all out draw down. To make matters worse, just a few well coordinated EMP generating blasts in space and the US military will be largely blind. No wonder DARPA is scrambling to counter the new maneuverable Chinese killer satellites with high altitude solar aircraft. My guess is the republicans will let Japan fall to the Chinese and go into a more conciliatory mode to keep the Chinese money needed for tax breaks for billionaires safe.

    1. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Compaqt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bringing oil from Iran to China involves going through the Straits of Hormuz (with US ships wandering around), past India to the Straits of Malacca (also patrolled by the US) and some other countries like Vietnam with which China is having a dispute regarding islands.

      That's why they are interested in extending a gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan to China

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  42. Not confirmed by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Informative

    As of now, the Chinese government is denying that there is an embargo over Rare Earth exports.

    http://english.cri.cn/6826/2010/09/24/1821s596078.htm
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTKB00705420100924

    There might still be some element of truth to it, but all the reports are getting confusing.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  43. Thank you China! by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...because, you see, a lot of people have become tired of the United States. It's very fashionable right now to hate the US and highlight everything that's wrong with the American agenda. Even in the relatively short span since the end of the Cold War, and due to some relatively severe foreign-policy bungling by the last administration, much of world opinion has focused gleefully on the failings of the US as the sole remaining superpower. Much is true.

    However, any reasonable examination of a situation can only be assessed fairly when one considers the realistic alternative possibilities.

    Now, with the growth of China, Asian powers may start to recognize that perhaps the (relatively) benign incompetence of the US isn't quite so bad. Every time China throws its weight around, one might be reminded that China doesn't really have much of a history of plurality, openness, liberality, or empathy. In fact, the only times that they haven't been expansive (within their understood natural frontiers), brutal, corrupt, and oppressive is when they've been too incompetent to manage their own massive domestic failings.

    Perhaps the grass on the other side of the Pax Americana fence may not be that shimmering green that some seemed to think it was. Thanks China for doing your best to remind everyone.

    --
    -Styopa