Slashdot Mirror


You Are Not Mark Zuckerberg, So Stay In School

theodp writes "Over at TechCrunch, Vivek Wadhwa offers some don't-be-a-fool-stay-in-school advice to students that sounds a bit like an old-school Mr. T PSA. TechCrunch CEO Michael Arrington's questioning of whether students need to get any degree or go to college at all may sound appealing — dropouts Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates did do alright for themselves — but Wadhwa gives some good reasons why you should probably take the school-is-for-chumps argument with a grain of salt. 'The harsh reality,' warns Wadhwa, is that for every Zuckerberg, there are a thousand who drop out of college and fail,' and many big companies won't even consider hiring you for that fallback job without a degree. And, believe it or not, you can still become a tech billionaire later in life even if you're cursed with a PhD." Tech entrepreneur Michael Robertson approaches this question slightly differently; here's an analysis he made a few years ago, with the conclusion that the college investment pays off only about half the time.

39 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. It's true by papasui · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not an unethical thief who would thinks nothing of stealing from friends.

    1. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey even Zuckerberg needed to go to school to find people to steal ideas from, right?

    2. Re:It's true by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, are you talking about Gates or Zuckerberg?

      Yes.

    3. Re:It's true by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      NO, it's not. If you ask the teacher and they say okay, then it's okay. The idea is
      1. since you're not a student, if you cause problems, you're a lot easier to boot out,
      2. if you're auditing the class, you're probably more interested in it (and more interesting) than most of the students who are just there for the grade
      3. next semester, you enroll in the class, skipp all the classes, write the exams, get your grade. Teacher is happy, school is happy, you're hapy

      So no, auditing a class isn't stealing - you won't get the credit unless you pay for it.

      Also, auditing a class at the same time as you're taking one of the stupid prerequisites is a good way to cut down on wasted time - just skip the prereuqisite except for the tests and coursework requirements.

    4. Re:It's true by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If a student who is auditing the class is better able to stimulate intelligent discussion, everyone benefits. You want to be spoon-fed? You're holding the class back.

      Also, the teacher IS giving permission. The paying students have no say in the matter, since the teacher is the one who determines the teaching environment. Auditing classes is a normal part of education.

  2. Common sense by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The harsh reality is that for every Zuckerberg, there are a thousand who drop out of college and fail

    When I get into discussions about this topic with (young) people and they think they can play the "Bill Gates" trump card (For some odd reason, they think I should admire the man since I'm "into computers"), this is exactly what I tell them. It's just plain common sense.

    If you can't or won't get a college degree, go into plumbing, carpenting or another trade. They are highly undervalued "socially", but I know many of those who make much more money than I do with my computer science degree and cushy admin job. Of course, you won't get "rich" in the "rockstar rich" sense, but if the goal is to make a good living, those jobs are very good choices.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Common sense by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I get into discussions about this topic with (young) people and they think they can play the "Bill Gates" trump card (For some odd reason, they think I should admire the man since I'm "into computers"), this is exactly what I tell them. It's just plain common sense.

      You don't have to be a beat-the-odds tech celebrity to do well without a college education. When I interview people, their academic degrees play little to no role in my hiring decision. My primary considerations are their portfolio of work (professional or otherwise), how well they can demonstrate their skills during the interview, and how well I believe they would integrate with the team.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:Common sense by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, as either, you -can- make hundreds of dollars per hour. Most don't, though. Discussing what you can make is pointless. Find some statistics about how much the average person makes and that's a lot more meaningful.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Common sense by ezzzD55J · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if you wanna get that tough, talk median, not mean ;)

    4. Re:Common sense by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The thing is, it's true that getting a degree is not the only route to getting somewhere, but it's a route to getting somewhere. So if you have a great business idea or a fantastic job opening available, by all means compare your options and judge accordingly. But don't do nothing and pretend to yourself that by not going to University you're automatically taking another route to success. All you're doing is giving up one route. You still need to find something else to do instead and unless you're Bill Gates or Richard Branson, maybe you wont.

      Know how to make money without a degree? Go do it. Sitting on your arse thinking a degree isn't vital to success so by not going to University you'll be a success? Bad logic.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Common sense by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The electrician has a portable skill that CAN'T BE OUTSOURCED, is convertible to similar skills with minimum training, and complements other trade skills.

      You can barter skills with other tradeshumans to enhance your living space, shop, or trade for vehicle work/parts. Plenty of opportunity to human network for side money.

      You can be self-contained, with all your gear fitting in a truck or trailer.

      Electricians are like auto mechanics. They may not get rich, but I've not seen one starve.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Common sense by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh, that's just splitting hairs. How many IT people are getting outsourced to India? Vs. how many plumbers? Perhaps job security is less important these days than career security.

      The big issue here is entrepreneurship - having an idea and turning it into a successful business. People seriously underestimate the value of entrepreneurship. Formal education is, well, too formal to foster a can-do sense of entrepreneurship. It's too much about connecting the dots, painting by numbers, checking off the boxes, following a previously existing program structure. It's the difference between doing what someone else is telling you to do versus forging your own path.

      Starting and running a business, especially in a new field, requires an unusual amount of initiative and savvy. I can't think of any PhD program that's designed to foster entrepreneurship and initiative. You don't even need to be an innovator - it's about DRIVE. Gates never really innovated, at best he just used existing ideas, but he saw how things could be molded into a successful business.

      Smart people are more likely than stupid people to earn a degree, land a job, start a business, recognize an opportunity. But regardless of intelligence, if you just sit there waiting for opportunity to fall into your lap you're going to be waiting a long time.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    7. Re:Common sense by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you are missing the most important ingredient....being a ruthless bastard. What do Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg have in common? Being ruthless bastards. Jobs screwed Woz out of money back when they were selling to Atari, and to this day has no problem dropping his lawyer army and those that piss him off, Gates played nice with both Jobs and IBM until he could get what he wanted from them then fucked them over with Windows, as well as ripping off Spyglass for IE, and of course Zuckerberg and his infamous "dumb fucks" screwing his friends privacy.

      So I'd say if you are really gonna shoot for being a Gates or Jobs you have to not only have a sense of entrepreneurship, but also being willing to fuck over your own momma to get ahead. It is being a truly ruthless bastard that makes the great ones, because as Jack Tramiel said "Business is war".

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Common sense by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would an ambitious person forgo college, choose a more difficult starting position, and choose to leave a distinct void in his resume?

      Because that person understands compound interest and what it means for student loan debt to be non-dischargable in bankruptcy.

    9. Re:Common sense by Surt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plumbers and electricians struggle to find 40 hours of work per week where I live. I was curious about how their incomes compared to mine, and the last couple guys I worked with said they typically had about 25 billable hours of work in 50 hours on the job. The rest was driving from place to place and other forms of non-billable time. So $100/hr for actual work doesn't translate into the same salary as someone who is paid that rate for a 40/hr job.

      I used to get paid 65/hr as a software contractor. But I billed 60 hours a week. Care to guess who made more that year, me or the $100/hr plumber?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Common sense by Almost-Retired · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I have run into that attitude in job interviews, and it sucks.

      But, I am one of those people who was a boy geek 4 decades before the name was invented. I have an 8th grade and a couple pieces of freshman in high school education, and at the time a rather severe food allergy that made attending and absorbing anything from school difficult at best. So at 14, I went out to fix tv's for a living. Then I found the food allergy and stopped drinking milk products for several years.

      School had taught me how to read phonetically, and I was pretty good at it and enjoyed it, gobbling up everything I could find on the electronics and physical subjects.

      Getting tired of consumer electronics, I switched to broadcasting in 1962 shortly after obtaining an FCC 1st Phone. Never slowing my reading, in 1972 I passed the C.E.T. exams, again without cracking a book specifically to study for it. The sign on my usually vacant (because I'm someplace else actually working) office door has usually said Chief Engineer since 1977.

      I retired in 2002 in my 67th year, or tried to, I still get odd jobs, from 18 years as the CE at a medium market station in West Virginia, I am blessed with having enough money to afford some hobbies and keep myself in things to do, although that is becoming limited because of type 2 diabetes, so the cold weather hunting and fishing sports are less enjoyable now, but I'm happy and I figure I've had a good ride as I look at my 76th birthday in about 10 days.

      Am I a millionaire?, hell no, but I do have money in the bank and I didn't have to screw a lot of people over to get here either, I simply gave them a job well done, keeping them making the money they willingly paid me some of.

      There is I believe, something to be said for honesty. I don't have any ulcers and I sleep as well as can be expected at my age.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
        soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      Man's unique agony as a species consists in his perpetual conflict between
      the desire to stand out and the need to blend in.
                                      -- Sydney J. Harris

    11. Re:Common sense by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you are missing the most important ingredient....being a ruthless bastard.

      I'm pretty sure that's not the most important ingredient. If that were the most important ingredient, I know a lot of people who would be rich right now. It only seems common in famous rich people because it's common in everybody. A lot of homeless people will steal a dollar from their mate, too.

      --
      Qxe4
  3. Cause and Effect by lacoronus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These dropouts dropped out because they were wildly successful. They didn't become wildly successful by dropping out.

    1. Re:Cause and Effect by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is probably the best summary.

      If you've gone and already set up a company and are already quite profitable dropping out *at that point* to put more time and effort into making the business more successful can be fine.
      You learn most of the useful stuff in the first year or 2 of any CS degree anyway.

      Dropping out of college because "sure bill gates did ok" when you don't have any business or anything to build on isn't such a good idea.

    2. Re:Cause and Effect by spasm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amen. I dropped out of comp. sci. in 1989 because a side business I had modifying and making electronics for the handicapped started taking up enough of my time that I couldn't do both. Two years later, I was still barely scraping by, so I wound up the business and went back to university. 20 years later (ouch), I consider that two year stint running my own business to have been a crucial and valuable part of my education (even though I went on to get a PhD and now do completely unrelated research). If I'd burned my bridges in any way when I 'dropped out' of school, I would have been screwed. If you feel your business/idea are good enough, go for it, but always make a plan for what happens when the business doesn't pan out - statistically most first businesses don't.

  4. Oversaturated degree market by ZigiSamblak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's only so many jobs for people with degrees. I dropped out of a multimedia design course over ten years ago. Then got into various jobs and ended up doing advanced technical support at a big company after 5 years of working there. A friend who had not dropped out after the first year and completed the degree could not find any steady employement in the designer field and ironically ended up doing lower paid technical support work through an outsourcing partner of the same company.

    In the past when less people went on to college a degree was more valuable and basically meant a well paid job for life, but the market has changed and many more people are getting degrees. It pays more to carefully consider your options, getting work experience may be better than years of study in many cases.

    1. Re:Oversaturated degree market by Junta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Saturation has devalued the prospects of a degree, but not having a degree is in no way an advantage over having a degree. While a degree is further away from guaranteeing a job, not having a degree will guarantee that you cannot get certain jobs.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  5. College investment by Zouden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    college investment pays off only about half the time.

    Making it better than many other investments today.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
  6. Harsher Reality by jaypifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'The harsh reality,' warns Wadhwa, is that for every Zuckerberg, there are a thousand who drop out of college and fail,'

    The harsher reality is that there is another thousand that finishes college and still fails.

    --
    Never go to sea with two chronometers; take one or three.
  7. There is a link however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Between successful entrepreneurs and people who never went to university at all. For instance, I founded my own business when I was 19, now paying myself a decent wage off it 4 years later - and I would say most of the business owners I know didn't go to university. In fact, three of them, including my uncle (now a millionaire) are ex-cons...but maybe that indicates a different correlation...

    I understand that this may well not be the norm - but I have seen many separate studies that indicate both of the following statements to be true:

    a) University is a waste of money for most people who go
    b) Not going to university will seriously limit your earning potential

    I guess the truth is probably somewhere in the middle...

    1. Re:There is a link however... by zolltron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      University is a waste of money for most people who go

      I hate these sorts of claims because they are absolute nonsense. How can you know if my university degree was a waste of money for me? Do you know how much I value the things I learned (both in and out of the classroom) at the university? No, of course not, because you don't know me. It's like looking at someone you've never met and saying that they were stupid to go eat at some particular restaurant.

      Usually, these sort of studies assume that the only reason anyone would go to college is to improve their lifetime earning potential and then compare the average change in earning to the cost of the university. While this is an important consideration, it shouldn't be the prevailing one, and more importantly it shouldn't be translated into the only potential thing of value that might come out of a university education. We are all not mindless money generating machines that simply wish to take the quickest route to a buck. Some of us want to enjoy the journey too.

      I am a far better person for my university education. Even if it cost me money in the long run, I'm happy I went.

  8. Plus parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gates is not a success from the gutter, his family was already loaded and well educated. Likewise with a lot of these successful "college dropouts". The reality is by being raised by well educated and financially sound people, you already have a big advantage, let alone when it comes to making early deals using the extended family network. Family networks work so well, you can be a military deserter and still become the president of a large and power country.

  9. Re:Put in the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You don't need a college education, if you follow the 10,000 hour rule.

    I assume you are referring to the idea that it takes 10,000 hours to become a true expert at something. The problem is that in many cases it is irrelevant whether you are an expert or not. What matters is whether there is evidence you are at least competent.

    Most people do not end up being tech entrepreneurs, in the same way they don't become international spies for MI6 or top-flight football players. Most people will need to get a normal job somewhere and if you are looking for a reasonably good job, a degree or professional qualification is necessary, either because it is required in the field (eg accountancy, engineering) or because HR will use "has a degree" as a criteria to screen out half the applicants. Now is it possible that one of the people without a degree is actually the cleverest, most hard-working applicant? Yes. But the company is not prepared to quadruple its job candidate search time and costs on the off-chance that an unlikely candidate on paper may be a hidden star in practice.

    In general ./ tends to idolize geniuses who single-handedly revolutionize the world through the sheer force of their intellect. That's fine, but genius doesn't scale. The things that can be done by genius alone are limited. To operate on a large scale to provide the goods and services that society wants takes organization and bureaucracy. It's less romantic, but that's the way it is. Negotiating that bureaucracy is just part of life, and today this means a college degree is needed.

  10. Ideals and reality by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ideally, if you work hard, you will succeed. In reality, if you work hard, it will likely be for SOMEONE ELSE who will use your hard work for their success. This is why your boss drives a better car than you and has a bigger house while you do all the work.

    This is a simplistic picture but generally accurate.

    So what did we learn from this? If you want to "succeed" (whatever that means) then you have to be more like the people who are already succeeding. If you wish to study, then study those people and do what they have done. And if your conscience gets in your way, then you have two choices -- listen or don't listen. It's a decision you will have to live with either way.

    The things Bill Gates has done to the whole world are impressive by any definition. Some people would have a hard time doing that due to issues of conscience while others would have no problems at all. These others are classically identified as sociopaths. Statistics have born out that the most powerful people on the planet are sociopaths as they are willing to do what most people are not, for reasons of conscience. But fear not! There may be some hope for you.

    If you are one of those people who believe "if you are too stupid, ignorant or otherwise don't know what I know, then you deserve whatever happens to you" then you are already well on your way to being a sociopath. I know first hand, that there are a lot of people here on Slashdot who feel that way. (I'm sorry, but if you didn't know that truckload of explosives was heading your way while you were sleeping in your home, then you deserve whatever happens to you!)

    Personally, I decided long ago, I don't have what it takes to do what "successful" people do... or, as I see it, I have what stops me from doing what it takes. (I can't knowingly make people miserable and call it "just business" as many others seem to be able to do.) I have accepted it and I will just keep working every day, try to save some money and hope I die before I retire.

    1. Re:Ideals and reality by skyride · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I read your comment thinking "what a dick", but then I reached the last paragraph, and I just feel sorry for you. By the sounds of it, you're so wrapped up in "being successful", that the fact you think you won't be just makes you miserable. The problem you have is that you directly equate "being successful" to "screwing people over". Its possible to do one without the other. I'm not of course saying you can become a multi-billionaire, but why would you want/need more money than you can possibly ever spend? Its possible to run your own buisness, selling to a small niche of the market without screwing people over. Quite simply put, someone else already is, so its easy to undercut them in price while beating them in quality of service. You won't steal their whole customer base, but you can certainly make a size-able dent and a fair bit of money in the process.

      Cheer up. ;)

    2. Re:Ideals and reality by bfields · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "What modern-day success exists today did so without screwing over a bunch of people in the process?"

      Most of the people I know?

      Unless you have some bizarre definition of success that doesn't include making a living, doing quality work, contributing to a community, raising healty children, doing things you enjoy, learning about things that interest you....

  11. Community college is a much better deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The program I teach in usually has 100% of the graduates employed within six months of graduating. It takes three years. We're a community college so the tuition is quite low. Many of the students live at home with their parents, so they have cheap living expenses.

    The bottom line is that, for some college programs, the investment is pretty safe and pays off.

    Remember that the statistics for lifetime earnings take into account the History and English PhDs serving coffee at Starbucks. If you get a good job, your results are much better than average.

  12. College is not an investment by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know, in the 21st century, everyone is supposed to be some sort of businessman, and we are supposed to seek returns on anything we spend money on. Really though, people (in theory) go to college to be educated, not just to get vocational training. If you want vocational training -- and there is nothing wrong with that -- then you should go to a trade school, get a 2 year degree, and wind up with the same job you would have had if you spent four years getting a bachelor's.

    The sooner the "college is an investment" crowd gets out of our universities, the better.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  13. Define "fail" by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when is "not being a billionaire" the definition of "failure?"

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  14. Don't be fooled by the Education Lobby by webalimaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Young people don't be fooled by the Education Lobby! I too started by business when I was 19 and quitted my first degree due to lack of time to do both Degree and Business. Later I took my degree on a fast track. But it's a bad a idea, it's a wast of money and TIME (very valuable). I would be much richer today If I just skiped university altogether. University degrees are for stupid people who can't study on their own. What you need is to read books (according to your specific needs) on your own.

  15. Trust fund baby by AnonymousClown · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Gates had a million dollar trust fund - he's a trust fund baby.

    Therefore, he could take obscene amounts of risk and never have to worry about ending up in the gutter or having bill collectors after him. And if you add in that his Dad is a high powered attorney ...

    Gates was a perfect storm of trust fund, brains, timing, and ambition.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:Trust fund baby by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And luck. Never forget luck.

      I am sad for all those people who live in a determinist universe where all that happens to you can be explained by hard work and ambition, modulated by the amount of money you started with.

      Fact, sometimes things happen to you, good and bad. Fact, these sometimes cannot be offset by any amount of brains and work.

      Which is why a civilised society recognises that and helps out those people that ran into an unexpected and impossible to plan for problem. Which is why also, the richer and more advanced society is, the more taxed should be extracted, because a more complex society means also that many more things can go awry, and need to be planned for collectively -- and because more taxes do not affect your lifestyle after you are rich enough.

      People saying "this is my money", "I refuse to pay for someone else lifestyle choice", "I provide for my family, why can't they?", are a problem, because they think that given the same circumstances another Bill Gates would happen. Therefore, they think that is they play their cards just right, they will become rich. And if they do become rich (this happens), they think it is purely due to them -- refusing even to acknowledge the importance of living in a society whose infrastructure allowed it. And if they become a significant minority, they will eventually destroy society.

  16. Harshest Reality by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The harshest reality is that the jobs are leaving.

    The jobs of the CEO and his/her pals will be staying, of course.

    A university degree won't make you less expendable to a corpocracy that wants the cheapest workers. Unless you are willing to cost the same to the employer at 35 as you did at 25 (and use your benefits as little), your days are numbered.

    Code Poet, Rockstar Programmer, Unit-Test Guru, Meme Zealot, Jedi Knight of the Latest Methodology, or (what is likeliest) red-tunicked member of the Roddenberry Landing Crew or Storm Trooper cannon-fodder, the real masters of this game are the Bean Counters.

    The corpocracy has docile subjects. It has seen that it can lay people off without having to report it (IBM -- for years), take huge local tax breaks (which your family and community paid for) and then ship jobs overseas, and claim to be "a good citizen" while loudly claiming there are "insufficient numbers of skilled workers".

    Of course, you can take the Blue Pill and go back to your pasting your face into pictures of Gates and Zuckerberg. (o:

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  17. Re:Don't bother with college by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, that's a real problem. Blanket encouragement to everybody to go to college was a big mistake. There's a fair number of people who would be both happier and better off if instead of going to college they picked up an apprenticeship or got a certification of some sort. It's a complete waste of resources to have individuals with a PhD serving coffee at the local coffee shop or waiting tables.