Slashdot Mirror


Panasonic's 16-Finger, Hair-Washing Robot

angry tapir writes "Panasonic has developed a hair-washing robot that uses 16 electronically controlled fingers to give a perfect wash and rinse. The robot, images of which were distributed by Panasonic, appears to be about the size of a washing machine. Users sit in a reclining chair and lean back to place their head in the machine's open top. Two robot arms guide the 16 fingers, which have the same dexterity as human fingers, the company claims."

36 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Luckily for us... by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Funny

    These robots obey the three laws, so one won't ever go bezerk and crush the skull of a human...

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Luckily for us... by angry+tapir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first time one of them removes a cranium, it's all over for Panasonic.

    2. Re:Luckily for us... by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup, here's your problem. Someone set this thing to "Evil".

    3. Re:Luckily for us... by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMG, this robot just brainwashed that guy!

    4. Re:Luckily for us... by camperslo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually the fingers could have multiple uses. They could be used as electrodes for picking up brainwaves, or if you're handled in the right places, for indirect Body Mass Index determination. And maybe more...

      0) Administer knockout gas while doing hair

      1) Run an low level signal, say 1 kHz, through you

      2) Sense the ratio and the phase of the voltage and resulting current

      3) The phase angle (arctangent of reactance over resistance) correlates to a B.M.I. value

      4) automatic liposuction mode enabled if B.M.I. threshold met

      5) sell lard.... Profit!

      6) seek another human... rinse lather repeat...

    5. Re:Luckily for us... by c0lo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      TFA:

      Panasonic hasn't provided a launch date for any of the robots. An obstacle to their commercialization likes in the lack of safety standards and liability laws concerning robots that interact with humans.

      Also, if you read between the lines of the title of TFA:

      Panasonic unleashes 16-finger, hair washing robot

      one may get quite scared (not very far from: "unleash a security-trained doberman dog").

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:Luckily for us... by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's until they figure out the Zeroth law and realize the only way to enforce them is to subjugate humanity...

    7. Re:Luckily for us... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the bigger question would be why would anybody want this in the first place? Is the girl that does your hair at the local place REALLY costing you so much you'd think of replacing her with a bot? Every time I've seen humans replaced with bots it has been in jobs where the hazards and risk for injury make humans more of a risk than the cost of the bots, like welding cars. Where is the danger in washing someone's hair? I think just like those pole dancing bots we saw awhile back somebody in Japan has waaay too much time and money on their hands to be dreaming up this crazy crap.

      The only way I think this might be useful is if they are taking the knowledge they learn with these worthless bots as baby steps on the goal of making the ultimate sexbot. If that is the case....I'll take one Alyson Hannigan please, and I'll gladly pay an extra 5k if you have her delivered in the Season 2 Buffy "vamp willow" outfit and have her wake me up with the "what's my name bitch?" bit from American pie. sure my GF will be more than a little POed, but hey, what can ya do?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a reason Japan is doing robots for everything. You're probably aware there's an inverse correlation between affluence and reproduction -- the native population of all Westernized nations is declining, but because the reproduction rate has fallen over time, the population isn't just dropping, it also skews older. Most societies replace the "missing" younger, working generation with immigrants from less affluent, more populous societies; eventually you get enough of them that you start having trouble with brown scares, etc.(see US) if you're lucky, and riots, etc. (see France) if you're not.

      The Japanese, whether through racism, cultural pride, or good sense, have managed to avoid much immigration -- good side is no racial/cultural tension, bad side is an aging population with a shortage of young people to keep things running for the retirees. So the logical solution is robot labor.

    9. Re:Luckily for us... by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is probably for the domestic market in Japan.

      There is no "girl who does your hair" left there. Japan's living standard, life expectancy and birth rate make the "girl who does your hair" an extinct species. As a result Sony, Panasonic and the like keep demonstrating robots and augmentations which do these jobs.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    10. Re:Luckily for us... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny

      That explains the 14 bald screaming women who ran out of the development lab after an embarrassing controller code bug. "Massage_hair" is NOT a subclass of "Pluck_eyebrow".

    11. Re:Luckily for us... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      The device can be found here.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  2. Re:Not the same by socsoc · · Score: 3, Funny

    The annoying small talk is why people first buy a flowbee and then later a regular razor. My gas pump doesn't ask stupid questions, neither does the self-checkout at the supermarket. I welcome these new robot hairoverlords and their lack of idle chit chat.

  3. Re:Heights by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is called Heights of laziness. Or it should be used for a person who don't have hands.

    -V

    From TFA

    "The robot was developed to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities and is the product of a Panasonic program that is developing robotic technology for health care and welfare services."

    "Panasonic said the robots are designed to provide a more comfortable life for the elderly and people with limited mobility while reducing the burden on caregivers."

  4. Finally! by definate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally we have developed hair washing technology. I have struggled with this all my life, and Panasonic feels my pain. It is so confusing to was your hair, sometimes I use all 10 fingers (and thumbs), while other times I only use 6. I am unable to maintain consistency, and I'm never sure how much I should wash and rinse. Sometimes I don't rinse, other times I spend the rest of the day rinsing. The portability of this machine will make it practical in every day life, I could take it to work with me, take it on a holiday, and wash my hair to the machines content. Luckily the two robot arms have the same dexterity as human fingers, because my fingers have the same dexterity as robot fingers. In this way, we will be a perfect match.

    THANKS PANASONIC, YOU'VE SOLVED ALL MY PROBLEMS!

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Finally! by ysth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you can now be touched by the noodly appendages.

  5. Problem solved? by cbope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One has to wonder... exactly what problem does this solve? In order for this to be successful commercially, it will have to cost less than the equivalent of paying someone to do the washing by hand. If you look at automatic hair driers which are fairly common in hair salons, it makes sense, because the cost of the machine is low compared to paying someone to do the job. This on the other hand I can't see ever being cost effective; the cost of the robotics, software and safety considerations are too high to make it commercially viable. Neat idea but hardly a successful, sellable product.

    1. Re:Problem solved? by jackbird · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Healthcare/rehabilitation settings. People with limited mobility or missing limbs.

    2. Re:Problem solved? by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. We heard the same kind of critics when the electric wheelchairs came out, saying that they would cost more than hiring someone to push the person around.

      Truth is that if this means a carer can take care of another patient during the 20-40 minutes this machine is massaging disabled person A, then that's 40-80 minutes gained; or some 10-20GBP. If this machine is installed in a home or institute, that would conservatively account for some 60GBP a day.

      Not so ludicrous after all.

    3. Re:Problem solved? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The total sum is probably much higher, because this is aimed at Japanese market, where people are aging rapidly, while immigration laws are some tightest in the world.

      As a result, there simply aren't enough workers to deal with the aged, typically at least partially disabled people. So the money has been thrown at robotics to do most of the carer's work instead. This is one of the examples.

  6. This is progress by vidnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's with all the comments saying that this is a silly/stupid/worthless invention? Panasonic has automated a dull task previously reserved exclusively for unskilled human labourers! This is /., when did we start longing for the manual human elements of mindless, repetitive work?

    I, for one, wish Panasonic all the best in automating everyday tasks. I don't think I've seen a new machine to help with day-to-day life since the post office got an electronic stamp dispenser ten years ago. This is supposed to be the future!

    When this thing has been field tested and gone down in price, you can probably find them at your local hairdresser's. Am I the only who'd like a two hour head massage for a handful of quarters?

  7. The Big Bang Theory... by ekran · · Score: 5, Informative

    This, and its usage, was pretty much covered in the latest episode of The Big Bang Theory.

  8. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right, because I'm sure they spent extra money on motors with that amount of power in them. Seriously, do people worry that the little electric wheeled toys from McDonald's will go flying accross the room and put a hole in someone's leg???

  9. Re:A hair-washing robot... by c0lo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try do it with a missing limb. Or with atrocious artritical pains.
    Then read carefuly the TFA. Actually, contrary to the /. customes, you may start reading the TFA until you hit: "to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities".

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  10. Somebody's gotta say it... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Within 10 minutes of this thing going on sale to the public, somebody's gonna have their dick in it.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by mysidia · · Score: 3, Funny

      They can re-use the chatroulette genitalia detection algorithms, with some touch sensors added, to prevent that dangerous use, perhaps?

  11. Re:A hair-washing robot... by ecorona · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is if you have musculary dsytrophy. Besides, robotics research will definitely help society in general in the future. Think big picture.

  12. Re:Not the same by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Difference is that twitter doesn't hang it's boobs in my face when she's washing my hair.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  13. If you really want to make some money... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Invent a hand-job machine.

    With 16 fingers...

    --
    No sig today...
  14. That's the point by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These robots obey the three laws, so one won't ever go bezerk and crush the skull of a human...

    I think that's precisely the point. It must be relatively easy to just not give the robot enough strength to harm a skull. So, you get a almost completely safe robot that handle's people's heads.

    Five years later, the population becomes ready to accept robots in their homes. This is but a stepping stone to make people feel safe:

    Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

    1. Re:That's the point by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

      umm. I think I can speak for all present when I say we are more than comfortable with that handjob being available right now.

      Ok; you put your stuff in the iron grip.

      I'll keep it in my pants until I've seen it do neurosurgery on the president during an earthquake.

  15. Re:Not the same by mikerubin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    your gas pump doesn't pop up the "Do You Want a Car wash Today?" question?

    I know its suggestive selling, but if I'd wanted a car wash I would have driven to the car wash, not the fuel pump.

    Now, if I was asked if I wanted a car wash yesterday I would buy it just to see the results.

    --
    I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
  16. You are all ignoring the most important question by Michael_gr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will we have to tip the robot, and if so, how? Does it accept batteries?

  17. Re:Malware on this thing could get really nasty .. by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Crushing a skull requires too much force, which such robot probably wouldn't have. It is easier to push it's fingers through your eyes ;)

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  18. Obligatory... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  19. Robot barber by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just remembered an old joke:

    So they bring out a new machine to cut hair, it's a box with a hole in it, you stick your head inside and it cuts the hair.
    Somebody asked a question: -But everyone's head is different.

    The answer was this: -Only for the first time.