Slashdot Mirror


Lighthearted Facebook Friends Could Make You Join NAMBLA Group

mykos writes "The Facebook groups feature is causing bit of a stir with its users. TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington was allegedly added to a group about NAMBLA, and in turn, he added Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. It's all in good (albeit tasteless) fun, except when a harmless joke goes awry and you find yourself being detained by customs when a friend decided to drag you into a mock terrorist group. Facebook representatives are aware of the matter, but are dismissive of it. A Facebook spokeswoman said, 'If you have a friend that is adding you to Groups you do not want to belong to, or they are behaving in a way that bothers you, you can tell them to stop doing it, block them or remove them as a friend — and they will no longer EVER have the ability to add you to any Group.' In somewhat related news, guillotines ensure you won't have dandruff on your shoulders anymore."

50 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    not to use facebook. This can have some SERIOUS consequences for people working in the defence industry where security is well known to have a humor level of 0.

    1. Re:yet another reason by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Informative

      Won't help. A perfect stranger could put up info, pictures, etc that could be just as damaging, even if you have nothing to do with them or facebook.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:yet another reason by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

          You know, you're totally correct there.

          In one of my group of friends (real world, not just online), all but one had a Facebook account. They told him, "You'd better set one up." There was a legitimate reason for it, he just never got around to it. Since he didn't, they did. It had his name, picture, and they were posting comments for him. It was kind of humorous. And no, they didn't sign him up for anything illicit. :) It was enough encouragement for him to finally set up his own account, so they took the bogus one down.

          Now, what's the difference between friends doing it for a friend, and someone doing it for their own nefarious purposes? Well, just about nothing, except the nefarious purposes would likely get that person in trouble.

          We've all seen stories where someone got in legal trouble for pictures they posted. Like, a school teacher drinking beer, or a suspect in a case bragging about what they did. I found a profile not long ago of a rather attractive woman local to me. She was (or still is) a teacher at a local high school. By the posted comments, it was pretty apparent that it wasn't really the teacher. But if they were written a little better, some of the comments would have been damning. There were things about her liking sex with young boys, and frequent drug and alcohol abuse.

          I'm sure this kind of thing happens all the time. So how do you tell? Well, you don't. If I wanted to put up a profile of a popular figure, and I filled it with things that were really happening to them, and photos gleaned from tabloid news sites and regular media, it would look perfectly legitimate.

          Hmmm.

          [JWSmythe goes off looking for photos of Bill Gates and the link to the NAMBLA group]

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:yet another reason by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Happens a lot, not always with evil intent but ends up that way. Two of my coworkers have set up a sock puppet facebook account for a third coworker who is a relative technophobe but had recently acquired an iPhone. They found immense humor in his having the iPhone and felt that "facebook was the next logical step". They invited a lot of his friends, and made routine posts about his life that were factual although somewhat snarky. Anyone who knows the guy personally knew instantly that he wasn't operating the account. It was all in good fun, until someone posted something that was considered company confidential (by a petty piece of shit manager whose IQ may or may not exceed that of a 2x4). That got reported to the boss of the victimized coworker, said coworker of course has no idea what's going on, it stopped being funny at that point. The perpetrators did come forth and submit to their flogging, fortunately, but I can easily see facebook being damaging even if you avoid it.

    4. Re:yet another reason by erroneus · · Score: 2

      Precisely. Just about everyone in my family does facebook. And they all try to get me to do it too. I just see too many problems with it. Among them are some pretty obvious ones such as external entities attempting to [mis]use information acquired there, but it's also something of a chore. I already frequent a good number of sites. Adding more would be more of a hassle. And really -- there is no deep meaning there -- it's almost as if such sites encourage shallow, thoughtless personalities. I have various definitions for the word "friend" and the context carried through facebook doesn't even approach mine.

      Works for some people, but I need more quality than the format offers.

  2. Yes, learn to grow up folks by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your "friends" refuse to respect your request, then they're not really your friends. If they're not really a friend, why are they a "friend"?

    Facebook to users: We give you tools with which to communicate with people you trust. If you don't trust them, don't allow them to use those tools with you.

    1. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sometimes the only way to get ahead with your farm is to say that you are a 13 year old boy who likes older men.

    2. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by PatHMV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, no. I'm FB friends with my younger brothers. The youngest is in high school, and has the sense of humor one expects to find in bright, 16 year old boys... rather juvenile. I'm not going to de-friend my brother. I work at helping to teach him what's appropriate and what's inappropriate, but of course that's not always successful. If he were to add me to some group because of some childish whim of his, that doesn't mean he's not my friend... just that he's exercised some bad judgment.

      Do you immediately ditch all your friends the instant they do something against your wishes? If so, I doubt you have many left. Most of us have at least a few friends who on occasion act a bit like an asshole, but are our friends nevertheless.

      The REAL problem here is Facebook failing to let its users have control over what other users do to an aspect of our account. I can un-tag myself from pictures. I can turn off the ability of others to tag me in photos. Why can't I turn off the ability of other users to tag me in (i.e., make me a "member" of) groups? I should have complete control over all aspects of where my FB identity is linked in FB.

    3. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right. But lots of famous people will allow almost anyone to be their 'friend' so that they can hawk their latest book, CD, movie, coffee cup or whatever.

      So, for example, you could friend, say Barack Obama, and then start a group called, say 'Friends of Osama Bin Laden' or 'the Al Qaeda United Terror Front' or whatever and hilarity then ensures.

      Not that I'm suggesting anyone should do that.

    4. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, relationships change. You can have a friend, and then he learns something about you which makes him hate you (doesn't matter if it's true or not, as long as he believes it's true). You cannot know this before he makes it known to you. And if he decides to make it known to you by doing revenge, you cannot prevent it, because you cannot expect it.

      Moreover, someone who was never really a friend can play a friend exactly to get your trust, and thus to enable him to do more serious damage to you.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A Facebook spokeswoman said, 'If you have a friend that is adding you to Groups you do not want to belong to, or they are behaving in a way that bothers you, you can tell them to stop doing it, block them or remove them as a friend -- and they will no longer EVER have the ability to add you to any Group.' In somewhat related news, guillotines ensure you won't have dandruff on your shoulders anymore.

      Yeah, I'm a bit puzzled by the submitter's reaction, too. It may be the norm among high school jocks, college frat boys, and, after graduation, stalkers, to use abusive behavior as a form of affection, but mature, self-respecting people don't put up with it. Blocking someone on Facebook is what, two or three clicks? Anyone who thinks that's like the guillotine really needs to develop some perspective.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    6. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by bytestorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The tool should allow me to disable tagging of me by others in groups, pictures, notes, thus becoming more versatile, allowing me to also communicate with acquaintances and the general public with tiered levels of access.

    7. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amazing, isn't it? Your friends and family can affect your real life! And the only choice you have is to either deal with it or cut off all ties to them. Ever seen Black Sheep?

      The summary sure is rich. Removing someone from your Facebook friends is akin to cutting off your head. Brilliant.

      --
      Whale
    8. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by twidarkling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      spoken like someone who's never had to explain to someone why someone was removed from a friends list. People get pretty damned pissy at things like that, especially family, or if they think they were just kidding around, and you're taking it too seriously. So yes, removing a friend from a social network can have a detrimental effect on having them as friends in real life.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    9. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Removing someone from your Facebook friends is akin to cutting off your head. Brilliant.

      Uh, no.. remember those "A is to B" as "X is to Y" questions? Comparing A to X is irrelevant without factoring in B and Y. "2 is to 3" as "100 is to 150". Nobody's saying 2 is like 100.

      That said, I agree that removing someone from FB friends is not quite as disproportionate a response as the author seems to believe.

    10. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The REAL problem here is Facebook failing to let its users have control over what other users do to an aspect of our account.

      Funny, and my thought was that the problem is that you can be arrested or detained based on information gathered from a social network.

    11. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who did that happen to?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course... are we not laying the blame in the wrong place?

      Why are you being denied access to the plane? Why again? Is it because someone posted something on facebook? No... its because there are morons out there who think that they are somehow making the world safer by pulling names out of their ass and adding them to lists.

      Its the very fact that a "no fly list" even exists that is the REAL problem here. Ditto on employers trolling facebook for dirt. Its stupid.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    13. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by severoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, to 1st post, why should anyone be able to control the groups they're associated with? You're right, it should work just like real life where your most casual friends sign you up for all sorts of things that you have no control over, and you're just an idiot unless you simply accept your fate and go along with it, or terminate all your friendships just in case.

      It's obvious to me there's no other solutions, you just have to pick one of those two extreme, unpalatable options. THERE IS NO OTHER POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    14. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your "friends" refuse to respect your request, then they're not really your friends. If they're not really a friend, why are they a "friend"?

      Facebook to users: We give you tools with which to communicate with people you trust. If you don't trust them, don't allow them to use those tools with you.

      Do you trust your friends to:
      1) always be sober?
      2) share your sense of humour?
      3) use a secure unique password for their facebook account?
      4) be immune to phishing attempts?
      5) only have friends in their friends list that meet requirements 1-4?

      If all 5 points aren't met, the person should not be in your facebook friends list.

      Hmm... suddenly, nobody has any friends.

      Honestly, opt-out implicit trust of *accounts* is a BAD idea. Your friend and your friend's account are not one and the same.
      The concept would work great if there was a 1:1 mapping between person and account metadata. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

  3. Wait.. WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have a friend that is adding you to Groups you do not want to belong to

    That's how it works?
    So, instead of inviting someone to join the group, you can just add them?

    Dumb fucks.

    1. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's almost as if Facebook is a gigantic sociological test lab. The idea is to make the whole thing incrementally more ridiculous and obnoxious, and then measure how far you can push people before they quit.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by PatHMV · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it's /., but please at least RTFS (read the f'ing SUMMARY), which explains that this is a NEW Facebook feature, which works DIFFERENTLY from the OLD Facebook feature. You've just described the OLD Facebook group feature. This one works differently.

    3. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by koreaman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like you're right -- I apologize for my ignorance.

    4. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by Seriousity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      .... Dude, he made a simple mistake, just a normal human misunderstanding. and he admitted fault - this is commendable. Even if his original post was slightly inflammatory, it hardly warrants such a malicious outburst. You're either trolling or incredibly stressed/angry about something else, and venting on this poor guy - not cool.

      I think you should go outside, sit in the sun and try to find something to smile about - those facial muscles probably need a workout!

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    5. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the only way to win is not to play. And as someone who has never had any social networking accounts of any kind, I'm feeling schadenfreude-nly victorious right about now. Also, a bit lonesome--but the alternative seems to be getting worse every day.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  4. But it's so brilliant! by Draconi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I swear this is the standard response of any designer confronted, suddenly, with gaps in their thinking. "It can't be a serious problem, there is a workaround!"

  5. NAMBLA by niteice · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with the National Association of Marlon Brando Look-Alikes?

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    1. Re:NAMBLA by dpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was all ready to make some post about NAMBLA being a right-wing boogieman. But first I decided to check Snopes and Wikipedia. Sometimes I guess truth really is stranger than fiction - including conspiracy theories.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  6. Great... by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to only have one friend, my mother. To prevent being added to a bad group I had to unfriend her. Now she's yelling at me to come up out of the basement and explain myself...

  7. In Soviet Russia... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Funny

    Facebook Groups subscribe you!

  8. What? by moeluv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the hell would an option to do something like this even be added. I can see an invite system offering the ability to accept or deny an invite but being able to add someone automatically? Damn it was bad enough when my friends and I used to have junk mail wars and see who could get who on the worst mailing lists. This only ended when someone sent baby product catalogs to the wife of friend who was having trouble getting pregnant. I'm kind of surprised that guy survived. Perfect example of why this is a bad idea....someone always goes too far. Let's face it NAMBLA is pretty damn offensive.

  9. What kind of security is that? by jbarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So "friends" can automatically add you to a group? That sounds like a HUGE security and privacy hole. I could certainly see friends "suggesting" groups to you to join, but to give them default ability to add you to a group is just WAY beyond belief.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  10. Re:Non-issue by hedwards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because in the meantime if you haven't mastered Facebook's privacy settings a stranger might think you actually belong to those groups. Which isn't a problem until said stranger is in the position of offering or not offering you a job. Or deciding whether to do a more thorough investigation prior to a lawsuit or charges being filed.

  11. Re:Non-issue by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why worry about why? When you say it's a non issue, you're factually entirely wrong. It's an issue to them and their request is a relatively simple one ... allow a preference to disallow friends to make you join groups.

  12. Joining and then leaving a group makes you immune? by Zed+Pobre · · Score: 3, Informative

    The oddity to this is that they already have an approval mechanism -- it's evident when they say that if you leave a group that someone has added you to, you cannot be re-added without authorization. That makes it pretty clear to me that it would be trivial to make that setting a default, but they don't want to.

    Anyone care to start making a bot that automatically joins and then leaves groups as they are detected?

  13. Uh oh, not everyone can be your friend by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I think facebook has a callous disregard for privacy in general, their suggestion that you simply un-friend someone who plops you into a group is spot-on.

    Membership in a group really just means that your name will appear in their roster. No one will have additional access to your personal information. If you find it annoying that you have to remove yourself from a group you don't want to be in, just remove the friend who put you there along with it.

    Facebook has long needed better "friend" vs. "acquaintance" handling; i.e. you can share more with your inner circle than with the person you met once and say Hi to about every 6 months. Maybe this ruffle will be the push they need to get cracking on that feature.

  14. Re:Non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, no need to fix the lock; you can totally call the cops on any burglar who gets into your home. Every time.

  15. even close friends i don't trust with everything by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you are offering the absurd choice: trust your friends with everything or have no friends

    no, i want friends, and i want to decide how much i trust each one. am i asking too much?

    your understanding of what friendship means is crude and useless

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  16. Re:Non-issue by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do have an account af Facebook but I really don't use it much. But if is is like anything round here, there may be lots of people who have lots of friends that they don't really know - I for sure know I have an awful lot of friends requests from people I've never seen. It is quite hard if you have a thousand of friends to track them all. So you go to sleep one night and the next morning you wake up to find out you've been added to a hate-speech, or a pro-taleban group, a neo-nazi group (which is actually a criminal offense in some countries) or something like that. It is an inherently flawed concept. Of course you may always argue you never actually joined that group, but we live in a world where appearances count more than evidence.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  17. Re:Non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd have a different request. Remove the "feature" that lets friends automatically put you in groups and replace it with the standard invite scheme. If they really want they can add a preference (defaulting to off) to automatically accept these invites.

  18. Woohoo! by JSBiff · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . I knew not having any friends would pay off in the long run! Suckers!

  19. This has to change by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Facebook can't be this stupid.

    A friend should be able to SUGGEST that you join a group-- TO YOU so you make the decision.

    I wasn't aware this was even a feature of facebook. So there is no way to disable this short of unfriending the person? (and then it's still on my record as being part of that group anyway!)

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  20. me too! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    hey, we should, like, totally form a social group for people who aren't on facebook. Here, I'll pencil you in...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  21. Re:Non-issue by sinclair44 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which isn't a problem until said stranger is in the position of offering or not offering you a job.

    We all do dumb shit, including that recruiter. It's only a matter of time before the rest of the world catches up to realizing that just because you post status updates about being drunk from time to time does not mean that everyone else don't get drunk (and make some bad decisions while drunk) occasionally too.

    --
    Omnes stulti sunt.
  22. Re:even close friends i don't trust with everythin by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bingo! Give that man a ceegar! Only YOU should have the power to join a group PERIOD. This sounds like the guys at FB simply refusing to admit a feature is a "Bad Idea" and ignoring their users. I personally hope with all the asshattery FB has been pulling they will go the way of MySpace and another will come along that actually listens to their users. Sadly there are simply too many out there that use FB as an accurate source of info, even though it makes wikipedia look like encyclopedia britannica.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  23. Re:Non-issue by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great idea, until someone else registers a profile using your name and an old photo of you.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. Re:Thanks, another reason not to sign up by AJWM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I decided to be uncool and stay out of Facebook.

    That's okay, your friends* created an account for you.

    * If you don't have any friends, read "enemies".

    --
    -- Alastair
  25. Workaround Solution by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hopefully Facebook will fix this. In the meantime, or if they don't, I suggest someone start a group for, "Obnoxious Friends that Add Their Friends to Controversial Groups," group. Then, every time someone adds you to a stupid group, you add them to that group. Recursion and drama ensues. Nobody can take Facebook groups seriously ever again...Of course, the fact that they did in the first place is just too bad.