Slashdot Mirror


Lighthearted Facebook Friends Could Make You Join NAMBLA Group

mykos writes "The Facebook groups feature is causing bit of a stir with its users. TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington was allegedly added to a group about NAMBLA, and in turn, he added Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. It's all in good (albeit tasteless) fun, except when a harmless joke goes awry and you find yourself being detained by customs when a friend decided to drag you into a mock terrorist group. Facebook representatives are aware of the matter, but are dismissive of it. A Facebook spokeswoman said, 'If you have a friend that is adding you to Groups you do not want to belong to, or they are behaving in a way that bothers you, you can tell them to stop doing it, block them or remove them as a friend — and they will no longer EVER have the ability to add you to any Group.' In somewhat related news, guillotines ensure you won't have dandruff on your shoulders anymore."

10 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Wait.. WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have a friend that is adding you to Groups you do not want to belong to

    That's how it works?
    So, instead of inviting someone to join the group, you can just add them?

    Dumb fucks.

    1. Re:Wait.. WHAT? by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's almost as if Facebook is a gigantic sociological test lab. The idea is to make the whole thing incrementally more ridiculous and obnoxious, and then measure how far you can push people before they quit.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  2. But it's so brilliant! by Draconi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I swear this is the standard response of any designer confronted, suddenly, with gaps in their thinking. "It can't be a serious problem, there is a workaround!"

  3. NAMBLA by niteice · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with the National Association of Marlon Brando Look-Alikes?

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  4. What? by moeluv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the hell would an option to do something like this even be added. I can see an invite system offering the ability to accept or deny an invite but being able to add someone automatically? Damn it was bad enough when my friends and I used to have junk mail wars and see who could get who on the worst mailing lists. This only ended when someone sent baby product catalogs to the wife of friend who was having trouble getting pregnant. I'm kind of surprised that guy survived. Perfect example of why this is a bad idea....someone always goes too far. Let's face it NAMBLA is pretty damn offensive.

  5. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes the only way to get ahead with your farm is to say that you are a 13 year old boy who likes older men.

  6. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by PatHMV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, no. I'm FB friends with my younger brothers. The youngest is in high school, and has the sense of humor one expects to find in bright, 16 year old boys... rather juvenile. I'm not going to de-friend my brother. I work at helping to teach him what's appropriate and what's inappropriate, but of course that's not always successful. If he were to add me to some group because of some childish whim of his, that doesn't mean he's not my friend... just that he's exercised some bad judgment.

    Do you immediately ditch all your friends the instant they do something against your wishes? If so, I doubt you have many left. Most of us have at least a few friends who on occasion act a bit like an asshole, but are our friends nevertheless.

    The REAL problem here is Facebook failing to let its users have control over what other users do to an aspect of our account. I can un-tag myself from pictures. I can turn off the ability of others to tag me in photos. Why can't I turn off the ability of other users to tag me in (i.e., make me a "member" of) groups? I should have complete control over all aspects of where my FB identity is linked in FB.

  7. Re:Non-issue by hedwards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because in the meantime if you haven't mastered Facebook's privacy settings a stranger might think you actually belong to those groups. Which isn't a problem until said stranger is in the position of offering or not offering you a job. Or deciding whether to do a more thorough investigation prior to a lawsuit or charges being filed.

  8. even close friends i don't trust with everything by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you are offering the absurd choice: trust your friends with everything or have no friends

    no, i want friends, and i want to decide how much i trust each one. am i asking too much?

    your understanding of what friendship means is crude and useless

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Re:Yes, learn to grow up folks by twidarkling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    spoken like someone who's never had to explain to someone why someone was removed from a friends list. People get pretty damned pissy at things like that, especially family, or if they think they were just kidding around, and you're taking it too seriously. So yes, removing a friend from a social network can have a detrimental effect on having them as friends in real life.

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.