Slashdot Mirror


Study Shows Babies Think Friendly Robots Are Sentient

seanonymous writes "A study from University of Washington claims that babies think robots are human, so long as the robots are friendly. No word on what evil robots are thought to be. From the article: 'At 18 months old, babies have begun to make conscious delineations between sentient beings and inanimate objects. But as robots get more and more advanced, those decisions may become harder to make. What causes a baby to decide a robot is more than bits of metal? As it turns out, it takes more than humanoid looks — babies rely on social interaction to make that call.'"

15 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. understandable by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Klaatu barada nikto -now doesn't that sound like clear baby talk?.

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    1. Re:understandable by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aww come on you gotta tell us what it means now...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  2. These are not the humans you are looking for by Tr3vin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hopefully, this same trick will work on robot babies. We must start at a young age and show them that we are robots. It is the only way to protect our species.

    1. Re:These are not the humans you are looking for by melikamp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who cares about robot babies? I am more concerned about robot babes.

    2. Re:These are not the humans you are looking for by kalirion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you want Planet Earth to be destroyed?

      DON'T DATE ROBOTS!

  3. No word on what evil robots are thought to be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No word on what evil robots are thought to be.
    That is simple. They are known to be republicans.

  4. Well... by SudoGhost · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one, welcome our new robot babysitter overlords.

  5. Are you sure about that 18 months? by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think there is strong evidence that humans much older than 18 months cannot make a delineation between sentient beings and inanimate objects.

    If the supplied evidence is not enough, try this.

    --
    I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
  6. Remember the Sirius Cybernetics Corp's definition by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with"

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. Re:" No word on what evil robots are thought to be by 2names · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, I don't know...I've heard lots of babies say, "poo-poo."

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  8. Re:Correction by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Studies show that babies know that slashdot editors behave like robots.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  9. Re:How does this differ between humans and animals by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dogs are no smarter than a mouse, or turtle, or any other animal. They simply react to rote repetition.

    I've heard other people say that, before you.

  10. Re:How does this differ between humans and animals by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they think the dog is sentient?

    Initially, yes. Interestingly, when our toddler was developing her language skills, she practiced three sets of sounds - English language sounds that she heard her parents speaking, Spanish-language sounds that she heard from her nanny and grandmother and growly barky sounds that she heard from the dog. Eventually she realized the dog was a lower-order being and stopped trying to speak dog.

  11. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know full-grown adults who think plants have feelings.

  12. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    An explanation for the popularity of Al Gore!