Slashdot Mirror


Top Facebook Apps Violate Privacy Terms

cgriffin21 writes "No stranger to privacy concerns, Facebook is once again in the privacy spotlight, following a Wall Street Journal report that some popular Facebook applications leak personal information to advertisers. 'Many of the popular applications, or 'apps,' on the social-networking site Facebook Inc. have been transmitting identifying information — in effect, providing access to people's names and, in some cases, their friends' names — to dozens of advertising and Internet tracking companies,' according to The Wall Street Journal, which wrote about Facebook Sunday in the latest installment of its recent 'What They Know' series about advertising and the Internet."

15 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. facebook is the end of privacy as we know it... by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and it is the end of privacy as we DON'T know it!
    Mark Zuckerberg sure has a predisposition to violating people's privacy and trust.
    I would quit facebook but then I would risk losing my 300+ distant, casual acquaintances :(

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:facebook is the end of privacy as we know it... by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It makes me wonder why Facebook had a privacy "policy" for app writers when they could have easily scrubbed data before letting Zinga et al get their grubby mitts on them. A "Do not walk on grass" sign carries less weight than a groundskeeper, security guard, or a fence.

    2. Re:facebook is the end of privacy as we know it... by Goffee71 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Facebook isn't in the privacy business, its in the business business and until told to stop it, in court, via a socking great fine, it will carry on regardless.

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    3. Re:facebook is the end of privacy as we know it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It makes me wonder why Facebook had a privacy "policy" for app writers when they could have easily scrubbed data before letting Zinga et al get their grubby mitts on them. A "Do not walk on grass" sign carries less weight than a groundskeeper, security guard, or a fence.

      Because that wouldn't have made Mark Zuckerberg stinking rich.

  2. I'm surprised by IBBoard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, I'm surprised. Not at the fact that "private" data (in this case a UID that identifies a user that can be used to get their profile page and anything that they haven't hidden) has been released. No, I'm surprised at the fact that they are reporting it as an "inadvertent" release from the games and that people are shocked.

    If Facebook let data slip to the games when they didn't mean to then that'd be news. The fact that games (which, lets face it, appear to rely on either a) horrible advertising or b) selling your details, because there's no other way they could make it so profitable) give out extra data to advertisers that Facebook policy says that they weren't meant to seems like just another day at the office for many of those time wasting game developers.

  3. Looks just like referrer passing by sinclair44 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From my interpretation of TFA, it just looks like some apps were accidentally passing a referrer containing the user's Facebook ID.

    "Recently, it has come to our attention that several applications built on Facebook Platform were passing the User ID (UID), an identifier that we use within our APIs, in a manner that violated this policy," Vernal wrote. "In most cases, developers did not intend to pass the information, but did so because of the technical details of how the browsers work."

    "Press reports have exaggerated the implication of sharing at UID [user ID]. Knowledge of a UID does not enable anyone to access private user information without explicit user consent. Nevertheless, we are committed to ensuring that even the inadvertent passing of UIDs is prevented and all applications are in compliance with our policy."

    --
    Omnes stulti sunt.
  4. Re:i'm gay for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only does "obvious troll is obvious" work here, but you posted in the wrong fucking thread. Linux thread is the next story down you raging idiot. What is the world coming to when people can't even troll properly.

  5. Top Facebook Apps Violate Privacy Terms by obyom · · Score: 5, Funny

    No stranger to privacy concerns, Facebook is one again in in the privacy spotlight...

    Isn't "privacy spotlight" an oxymoron?

  6. Really? (sarcasm) by smbarbour · · Score: 3, Informative

    You mean Zynga actually is the money hungry whore everyone thought it was?

  7. FBPurity by scrib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firefox, greasemonkey add-on, and FBPurity. The "FB" stands for "Fluff Busting" not "facebook" for legal reasons...

    It blocks app messages, groups joined, events attended, everything. You can whitelist some things that you might want to see and create your own list of blocked words if you want. It's the only thing that makes facebook vaguely usable in my book...

    http://www.fbpurity.com/

    --
    Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
  8. Re:Also in the news by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recently purchased an ad on facebook for my company's product.

    I should have known something was awry when the following were offered as substitution variables in the ad copy:

    $FIRST_NAME
    $LAST_NAME
    $WHAT_MOMMY_CALLS_THEM
    $GENDER
    $AGE_RANGE
    $INCOME_LEVEL
    $INCOME_LEVEL_REPORTED_ON_EHARMONY
    $SEX_PARTNERS_IN_PAST_6_MONTHS
    $SEX_PARTNERS_IN_PAST_6_MONTHS_REALLY
    $POLITICAL_PARTY
    $POLITICAL_PARTY_THEY_ACTUALLY_VOTE_FOR
    $SPOUSE_BIRTHDAY
    $MISTRESS_BIRTHDAY
    $FACEBOOK_USER_THEY_STALK_MOST
    $CREDIT_CARD_LAST_4_DIGITS
    $CREDIT_CARD_FIRST_12_DIGITS ...

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  9. For the nth time already by TheABomb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not a "privacy leak" if you type the $#!% in yourself!

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    1. Re:For the nth time already by decipher_saint · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about when acquaintances release personal information about you on Facebook?

      That's the real problem with these apps that violate privacy, if it violates an individuals privacy it violates everyones (to some degree).

      Like it or not there is shared information that defines you, with our without your input.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  10. Re:FB Privacy...FWIW by siriuskase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't post anything you wouldn't want all your friends to know. Remember that you have friends you don't know about, the one's who pay FB to be your "secret friends". Isn't it nice to have so many friends?

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  11. I don't think it's a coincidence by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the apps with problems are the top ones.

    How do they become top apps?

    They work, are designed well, and are appealing to their audience both graphically and functionally.

    How do apps that best meet these criteria get built? By hiring top-notch programmers, web designers, and marketers.

    What do you need to hire top-notch programmers, designers, and marketers? Lots of financial backing?

    How do you get lots of financial backing and excellent investors? By selling a very good business plan.

    How do you get lots of money to fund development? Advertising and information brokering.

    What do advertisers pay a lot for? Extremely well-targetted ads that take into account specific characteristics of the audience.

    What do information brokers pay a lot for? Private information about your users.