Slashdot Mirror


Disc-Free Netflix Streaming Arrives For the PS3 and Wii

tkdog writes "Netflix has added Sony's PlayStation 3 and Nintendo's Wii to the list of devices that can stream their catalog's content without the need for a disc. On the Netflix blog, VP Greg Peters adds, 'In addition to removing the need for discs, we've developed a new user interface on both applications that significantly improves the experience. The new applications will allow you to search for content directly from the device and you'll also be able to view an increasing portion of our content library with subtitles or alternate audio tracks.'"

188 comments

  1. I love Netflix by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    What I love most about Netflix is the ability to watch movies online as well as have them send me DVDs in the mail.

    1. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I love most about life is that I'm not dead.

    2. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are definitely living up to your handle

    3. Re:I love Netflix by antdude · · Score: 1

      Netflix is nice, but I wish they require have subscription (another reasons why I don't have a PVR/DVR and prefer to VCRs, computers, etc.) but on demand payments. I don't watch many movies and others. I like RedBox for its 99 cents per day (even for late fees), but its selection is not very big and doesn't stream like Netflix. Amazon's on demand is OK, but limited, costs more, and has time limits unless buying it (still has DRM if keeping it). Mom and Pops, Hollywood Videos, Blockbuster, etc. are dying and costs more.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:I love Netflix by Osty · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd stop sending me movies in the mail. I never use them. I've been sitting on the same DVD for several months because of this. Just as soon as they roll out a streaming-only plan, I'm upgrading.

    5. Re:I love Netflix by PowersOfTen · · Score: 1

      Netflix is absolutely perfect for me. I love having high definition blu-ray discs available while also having unlimited streaming access to most of their content. I watch far too many TV shows for a pay-per-view system to be worth it, and streaming alone doesn't cut it because the HD quality just isn't there yet. For some movies streaming is okay, but at times I want eye candy. If Netflix in it's current incarnation falls to competition I will be sad indeed. The only downside to Netflix is the limited streaming selection, but it really doesn't bother me that much. I always find something to watch.

    6. Re:I love Netflix by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Be careful what you wish for, because I am in one of the "test markets" for broadband caps, and from talking to my local cableco they pretty much all will go to tiered pricing in the next year and a half. You are looking at 36Gb per month residential, and 75Gb per month business. Of course that doesn't count for THEIR movies or VoIP, so I hope you like PPV.

      That is why I'm saying enjoy it while you can, because thanks to our lack of competition and deregulation allowing the big ISP to gobble up all the little ones instead of rolling out new networks to meet demand they are just gonna screw everybody and enjoy ever higher prices. Kinda also puts a stake in that whole "net neutrality" thing, has who gives a shit about whether you have net neutrality or not when you have 36Gb caps? Download your asses off boys and girls, because I do believe we will look back upon this time as a golden age of pre-dialup level suckitude. All bunches like Netflix and Hulu and Youtube are doing is speeding up the duopoly a little. But hell even Verizon is slowing down their FIOS rollout, so it looks like unless you are one of the lucky ones to be able to get FIOS you will be in the boned boat with the rest of us, sorry.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:I love Netflix by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Netflix has a good foothold. Sony and Microsoft have a direct financial interest in IPTV now. If the Cable companies try to hamstring it there would be immediate anti-trust objections. I doubt ISPs can get the genie back in the bottle.

    8. Re:I love Netflix by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I don't see how they can scream antitrust with a cap, as long as the major players like Netflix and Google are equally capped. They will just say "We offer more bandwidth past the cap at a higher price but their customers simply don't think their service is worth the extra expense. Is that OUR fault?" and that'll be the end of that. Just as if I don't want to jump from $100 a month to $200 a month by going to business class I can shell out $1.50 a Gb! for more bandwidth, but I sure as hell ain't gonna.

      That is why I think that unless Google, MSFT, and the other big players get together and agree to roll out a nationwide FIOS that things will go back to early DSL levels of shit. You can't FORCE the ISPs to give you more bandwidth without raising costs, not without going eminent domain and simply taking them, and if they refuse to take their profits and invest in more lines? You can't force them to stop reaping massive profits while their shit ages and falls down. Nobody invests in infrastructure anymore, thanks to greed and Wall Street with the "damn everything but the quarterly report!" day traders.

      That is also why I think they may end up using net neutrality to bite everyone in the ass. I don't see anyone demanding to cap cable TV, or forcing to sell ala carte, and they frankly don't make nearly as much on VoIP thanks to more and more going to cell, so I can see them agreeing to net neutrality and just giving EVERYONE a shitty cap. Then they can say they are being fair as they ain't giving an advantage to their VoIP offerings, while still letting them make HBO and PPV the choice for movies in the next decade. And of course you'll get the *.A.As ALL on the side of the duopoly, because they know with no bandwidth piracy will drop to almost nothing in the USA. Mark my words, thanks to living in a test market I'm getting a glimpse of ALL our futures, and it does indeed suck the big wet titty.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:I love Netflix by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd stop sending me movies in the mail. I never use them. I've been sitting on the same DVD for several months because of this. Just as soon as they roll out a streaming-only plan, I'm upgrading.

      What do you mean? I would assume that, since you don't want any movies in the mail, you have no need for having any movies in your shipping queue. I'd also assume that, if your queue is empty and you mail back your movie, they'll have nothing more to send you and thus you will get no DVDs mailed to you. Does this not work? Do they start mailing you random DVD then instead?

      On the other hand, if for some odd reason you still want to have movies in your shipping queue but not have them mailed to you (like maybe a reminder for movies you want to see which aren't yet streamable but hopefully will be some day) , then just set up a secondary profile in your account and reassign all of your DVDs (which I assume is only 1) to that account, and leave its shipping queue empty. I've never done that, but I assume they won't send you anything. I have had a secondary account with only one movie in that queue, and when that movie was not currently available, they shipped nothing instead of shipping something from the other account's queue.

    10. Re:I love Netflix by GreenEnvy22 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised to hear that part about your ISP's own offerings not being included in the cap. I believe in Canada, that practice is illegal. If they are going to cap you they can't discriminate their traffic or a competitors.

    11. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the worst part about being a slave? They make you work, but they don't pay you or let you go

    12. Re:I love Netflix by chrish · · Score: 1

      You could move to Canada, that's our only Netflix option here. And (AFAIK) the available library of movies is much more limited.

      And you get to deal with ISPs that generally have ~60GB/month transfer limits (although you can still get unlimited over cable if you shop around).

      So, uh, YMMV.

      --
      - chrish
    13. Re:I love Netflix by morari · · Score: 1

      [quote]Just as soon as they roll out a streaming-only plan, I'm upgrading.[/quote]

      You mean "downgrading", of course?

      The streaming feature is a nice bonus, especially when combined with things like the improved Wii channel or PlayOn. That said, there are certain perks to getting discs in the in the mail that can't be beat. I rip and return my films the very same day, so I generally acquire three films per week for my back catalog. ;)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    14. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a meme...
      What I love about cars is that they let me drive places, or not drive places...
      What I love about women is that they cook in the kitchen as well as have sex with me...
      What I love about Meme's is the ability to be funny at first as well as get old real quick...

    15. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      36Gb might just barely be enough to download a Linux iso. Streaming media isn't going to last very long. Next time get your abbreviations correct.

    16. Re:I love Netflix by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised to hear that part about your ISP's own offerings not being included in the cap. I believe in Canada, that practice is illegal. If they are going to cap you they can't discriminate their traffic or a competitors.

      Not True.
      I'm on Rogers (until I get switched to TekSavvy).
      They charge me past bandwidth caps (to a certain point, which I make sure I go way over so I'm paying less per overcap-gb when all's said and done) and throttle my torrent speeds. Full 10mbit (1mbyte/sec) is easy to get off of an http stream, but my torrents rarely break 200k/s (until a couple weeks ago torrents weren't throttled, and I regularly saw 700-800k/s torrent downloads)

    17. Re:I love Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about DVDs, not internet.
      Besides, the online streaming of netflix is not terribly bandwidth intensive.

    18. Re:I love Netflix by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Netflix in Canada is streaming only. And it's $8 a month. If you compare that to renting from the rental store, 2 rentals could cost as much. Compared to on demand movies from my cable provider, it's only $2 more than a single rental. $8 at the end of the month is almost completely unnoticeable. If they started doing on demand payments, it would just mean that you'd have to think about whether or not you wanted to pay $X every time you turned it on. By making is a single, very low, flat rate, they make it so you never have to think about whether or not you have to spend the money.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:I love Netflix by antdude · · Score: 1

      Well, I rarely watch movies these days like every other month. Theater is even super rare. Maybe once or twice a month these days? :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    20. Re:I love Netflix by oprig · · Score: 1

      ITA. I bought a roku box a couple of months ago (don't have a PS3 or Wii) and mostly use it for letting my children watch old films & cartoons. Personally, having bought a blu-ray player a while ago I prefer the quality of 1080P to the instant gratification of streaming. Now if the streaming was 1080P with lossless audio.....

    21. Re:I love Netflix by yodleboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you want on demand payments?? Sure, I use Amazon for new releases, but for old content, why would you want to be nickle and dimed like that? Say you're a big fan of TJ Hooker. Now, at this point, the only people willing to pay for something like that have to be serious fans that would probably want all the episodes, not just one or two. You can stream it from Amazon for the low price of $2 per episode. For a one time viewing. At that price, you can just buy the DVD's and "enjoy" Hooker as often as you want.

      I just used TJ Hooker as an example, but the pricing was consistent for most old shows on Amazon. At least with Netflix, my $9 a month lets me watch the content they do have over and over. Until the pay per view types start charging realistic prices for content I'm out. Even at .99/episode, it's hard to justify not just ordering the damn DVDs from Amazon instead.

      There is no reason an episode of a 20 or 30 year old TV show should cost as much as many newer release movies. At this point they should be grateful that they get ANY revenue from old content instead of being greedy about it. Still, it's probably hard to accept the lower end of pricing for these guys. There's just not a good pricing model for content that should probably be sold for pennies but costs a dollar to encode and stream.

    22. Re:I love Netflix by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a potential antitrust violation. It doesn't matter whether they're being equal about it or not, if they're extorting money out of the consumers to provide the service there's definitely room for an investigation.

      Sure you can, they're using a public resource, one which does not belong to them and you sure as hell can tell them that if they don't spend x% of the money on infrastructure improvements and maintenance and hit our targets that you're not going to be using that resource anymore.

    23. Re:I love Netflix by OneFix · · Score: 1

      They have done "tiered pricing" in the past, and it never sticks. The reason being that not everyone will switch to tiered pricing and when everyone finds a company that has "unlimited" access, people will switch overnight. I'm not saying they won't try it, but the outcome is already determined.

      One reason the 75Gb per month for "business" won't work is because businesses can still buy a T1 or higher that is unlimited for just about the same price as they are paying for cable or DSL.

    24. Re:I love Netflix by antdude · · Score: 1

      I rarely watch TV shows from discs/online. Only movies.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    25. Re:I love Netflix by GreenEnvy22 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understood what I meant. If Rogers is offering a streaming video service through their internet service, they have to count that towards your data cap just as they would for netflix. They can't give their own service an unfair and artificial advantage like that. They certainly would love to, and thats what the whole net neutrality debate is about. This came up when Bell first started throttling customers. One of the reasons the CRTC ruled with Bell initially was because they also throttled customers using Bell's own services.

    26. Re:I love Netflix by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I still haven't heard you explain WHY it would be "extortion", if they went to the same model your grocery store uses. It would be no different legally than saying "You want the small bag of peanuts it is $y, the jumbo bag is $z" as long as they didn't say "but if you want Planter's because they refused to kiss our ass it is $ZZZ". Believe me stuck in shitty capland I WANT you to be right, but I just don't see it.

      Now you are more likely to be able to use the iron boot of the government, but in a way that scares me more. Just look at the last two presidents we've had. You let the government take over it would become "happy consumerland" where there is NO porn, NO Wikileaks or anything critical to the government (or their "friends" like AIPAC), no encryption that the government didn't have the key to, etc.

      So unless you can show me some precedents on how changing to a tiered pricing model (which I understand parts of Europe and OZ are ALREADY under) then I think we are stuck between a rock and a hard place. The incredible cost of laying lines makes competition nearly impossible, the big boys own ALL the backbones, and you can count every major player in the USA on two hands with fingers left over. And as we saw with health care thanks to citizens United you can give up getting anything anti-corporate passed in this country, as any major laws will end up a lobbyist wish list. So unless you can point me to some hard data or show me somehwre in the past they've gotten smacked down for this I think we are boned.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:I love Netflix by starfire83 · · Score: 0

      Then clearly you are not part of Netflix's target demographic. Either start watching more TV shows via Netflix that you haven't seen and are no longer aired (like Arrested Development) and start thinning out your DVD collection or stop commenting on Netflix since it has zero usage for you.

    28. Re:I love Netflix by starfire83 · · Score: 0

      Simple solution is for ISPs and telecoms to become public utilities with uncapped services but with a pricing model reflecting today's internet services - pay a little, get a little (as in $10/mo = 3MB line, no bandwidth cap) and pay a lot, get a lot and others in the middle. It would be beneficial for everyone but the greedy, self-serving, monopolistic ISP and telecom companies and I wouldn't feel too bad for them.

  2. The GUI is a little glitchy by Serenissima · · Score: 2, Informative

    But everything seems to play fine on my PS3. One thing that's awesome is that you can push and hold the left and right and scroll continuously through the lists. Also, it shows 2 horizontal lists instead of one list. Nothing wrong with it, but I'd prefer to be able to choose how it's displayed.

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      One thing that's awesome is that you can push and hold the left and right and scroll continuously through the lists.

      Speaking as somebody who doesn't own a video game console, and someone who doesn't use netflix, that sounds like any awfully low bar for "awesome".

      Isn't being able to hold down a key and scroll continuously pretty much a universally standard UI feature? Hell, even xterm does it...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      It was quite irritating when you could NOT do it on the disc version. Now that it is there, by comparison to the previous version, it is SIGNIFICANTLY more awesome. By several degrees.

      :D

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How well can xterm stream 1080p and dolgby digital to you?

      That's like saying my sedan with all whell drive lacks a common feature and your truck has always had 4-wheel drive.

    4. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      How does being able to play 1080p video magically impede good UI design? If you are honestly impressed by key-repeat, and not just a trolling fanboi, then all I have to say is, "wow..."

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Stop trolling him. You know exactly what he means. He's not honestly impressed that they were able to accomplish held-key-scrolling. He's happy that an essential feature that previously didn't exist now exists. The common usage of awesome doesn't literally mean "I'm in awe" these days. It's a way of saying "that's great"

    6. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by internewt · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing that's awesome is that you can push and hold the left and right and scroll continuously through the lists.

      Speaking as somebody who doesn't own a video game console, and someone who doesn't use netflix, that sounds like any awfully low bar for "awesome".

      You obviously haven't used proprietary products much recently. They are frequently so dumbed down and simplified that if there is a useful feature, the users that can recognise its usefulness go "wow". Those that can't recognise the usefulness get confused by it, and call the manufacturer to complain. This raises support costs, meaning that the next generation of product from the manufacturer stands to be dumbed down even further!

      Now then, I'm not saying that this means Free stuff doesn't have UI deficiencies, they are just different to the proprietary ones!

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    7. Re:The GUI is a little glitchy by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You could always do it on the disk version. Only analog stick and hold it about 50% into the right or left. It scrolls rather slowly though.

  3. About damn time! by pdragon04 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely love streaming Netflix on my PS3. This just made it even easier for me to be lazy and never need to get off my couch!

  4. double rainbows by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 0

    What exactly does this mean? Does this mean that only a hand-full of content will be streamed or will it be any item in their library? How does the Xbox version compare? Same?

    1. Re:double rainbows by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      When I first got the PS3 disc, it was a piece of crap compared to Netflix on the 360. Hopefully, they've improved it substantially.

    2. Re:double rainbows by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 5, Informative

      Summary is missing out the biggest benefits - 1080p streaming (not all, but I guess almost all HD movies will be 1080p now - from 720p of the disk days IIRC), and Dolby Surround 5.1 (compared to Stereo with the disk).

      And from what I have read, there will be more content available now (compared to the disk), but of course not all. My guess is that they are adding content every day, but it's nowhere near their full movie library.

    3. Re:double rainbows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      whats the bit rate. if its low 1080p isn't going to help much

    4. Re:double rainbows by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I first got the PS3 disc, it was a piece of crap compared to Netflix on the 360. Hopefully, they've improved it substantially.

      Sorry, it's still a piece of crap. It's better than the BD-Live disc implementation, but not by very much. The 360 interface is still much nicer and more usable IMHO. Of course it currently lacks 1080p/DD5.1 support, but the PS3 version doesn't tell you what movies have that anyway so it's not really that useful.

    5. Re:double rainbows by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Low, which means it will actually hurt perceived resolution because it will be wasting bitrate on pixels that will be blurred in the next frame anyways. It's the same reason I always use joint stereo in LAME, why waste bitrate on stereo difference that the brain can't hear 99% of the time when it can go to improving the mid and high end resolution instead (does not apply to all encoders but I find the LAME JS psychoacustics to be quite good).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:double rainbows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      First about Joint Stereo:
      The conversion from L+R stereo to M+S (aka joint) stereo itself is lossless and reversible. The thing is the latter can be encoded more efficiently if there is high correlation between the L and R channel. If you encode with joint stereo LAME will switch between joint and normal stereo on a per block basis depending on which the encoder thinks will be easier compressible according to the psymodel.

      About video:
      Higher resolutions are actually more easily compressible than lower ones. Say you have a lossless 1080p source and compress it at a) 1080p with 6 Mbps and b) 720x480 with 1 Mbps. In that case b) will have a lower quality per pixel than a) and downscaling a) would yield superior results. That's assuming that the bitrates chosen aren't ridiculously high for the content, but assuming H.264 and normal content those are low bitrates. The reason for this is that the block transformations are less efficient if the detail is tightly packed so the block is less uniform. That and generally smaller partition sizes have to be used.
      At 1080p with say 8 Mbps and a good encoder and codec Netflix could deliver very good quality, especially for newer movies which usually come with less noise and grain and are thus easier compressible. Of course they'll probably use ultrafast encoding settings so quality will suffer, but the same will be true for their lower resolution offerings.

    7. Re:double rainbows by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Depends on how low you go, BluRays are way above the bandwidth/pixel sweet spot. The sweet spot is around 0.2 bits/pixel which is ~10 Mbit for 1080p24 and ~4.5 Mbit for 720p24. Plus audio of course. So if you have a 5 Mbit line, getting a theoretical 1080p bandwidth-starved signal will actually be worse than 720p. For anyone above 10 Mbit 1080p will likely be an improvement.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:double rainbows by afidel · · Score: 1

      The 720p streams require a 7-10Mbps connection so I assume they are sending at near 7Mbps with the additional used to handle buffering and fast action scenes that are above the ABR. That's kind of a grey area but I think 720p24/30 will look better than 1080p24 and especially 1080p30 content.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:double rainbows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that only a hand-full of content will be streamed or will it be any item in their library?

      Any item in their streaming library, basically, Wii and PS3 are now equal to XBox and the PC in that all four can now stream movies in their streaming library.

      However, I still feel that the PC is much superior if you actually want to add movies to your instant queue.

    10. Re:double rainbows by tayhimself · · Score: 1

      Bitrate for Netflix (PS3) was 5 Mbps. Will have to check now but I doubt they'll go much over 5-8 Mbps. So it will be worse than satellite or cable which are honestly horrible. Any action scene gets horribly pixellated on my comcast HD box. I have a 720p 32" TV and its easily noticeable.

    11. Re:double rainbows by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

      And from what I have read, there will be more content available now (compared to the disk)

      I don't think the selection has anything to do with disk/no-disk. You get the same Watch Instantly selection whether on a computer, a console with a disk, or a console without a disk. The more content simply has to do with Netflix licensing more movies and TV shows on watch instantly.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    12. Re:double rainbows by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      True. Thanks for correction. There will be more content regardless of how you watch it - the disk is dead anyway in 30 days.

  5. Old news for Canada by adamwpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    Canada has had this technology for weeks now!

    God, I've always wanted to say that.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Old news for Canada by b0nes · · Score: 1

      no doot aboot it! mod parent up, eh? better than the canadarm

      --
      simple is as simple does.
    2. Re:Old news for Canada by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Well, we're not exactly back in the days of the Avro Arrow...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:Old news for Canada by cob666 · · Score: 1

      I live in the States and travel to Canada several times a year for a few weeks each. I was pretty pissed off on my last visit when I wasn't able to watch any of the shows I had in my instant queue because I had a canada ip address. I'm up there now and signed up for a separate account just to watch some of the stuff in my US queue and I'm appalled by how much stuff is NOT available in the great white north. The regional restrictions on content due to licensing issues is just absurd. I honestly feel that if I have a US mailing address as well as a credit card on my account that has a US billing address then i should be able to watch my movies when I'm traveling.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    4. Re:Old news for Canada by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      I live in the States and travel to Canada several times a year for a few weeks each. I was pretty pissed off on my last visit when I wasn't able to watch any of the shows I had in my instant queue because I had a canada ip address. I'm up there now and signed up for a separate account just to watch some of the stuff in my US queue and I'm appalled by how much stuff is NOT available in the great white north. The regional restrictions on content due to licensing issues is just absurd. I honestly feel that if I have a US mailing address as well as a credit card on my account that has a US billing address then i should be able to watch my movies when I'm traveling.

      Look into setting up a VPN on your home computer or using a VPN service.

    5. Re:Old news for Canada by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I was going to post the same thing. We had this released up north last month. Been enjoying my free discless trial for several weeks already.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Old news for Canada by CodingHero · · Score: 1

      My fiance here in the US has had her Wii streaming disc for at LEAST a month.

    7. Re:Old news for Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Avro what...Don't you know as a Canadian thou shalt never mention that! No sense in mentioning that it was an engineering feat either....just walk away.

  6. Finally something worth updating PS3? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, given I haven't updated my 3.15 PS3, but also have a 3.41 update firmware on my hard drive. And given all updates beyond 3.41 were more of ways to stamp out jailbreaks than actual features (well, there's the crippled 3D Blu-Ray support... but anyone with 3DTVs would probably want a better 3D Blu-Ray player that what the PS3 gives you).

    This might be the only real reason to lose the jailbreak...

    Anyhow, I wonder what Microsoft has to counter this - their Fall Update is due soon. They need to give Netflix out for free at the minimum, but the 5.1/1080p support is also required. Fun times.

    1. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what fw it requires, but it just showed up under videos, then asked for permission to install when I clicked on it. It may have come in a recent fw update, but there's not a new fw update out tonight explicitly for it.

    2. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather have a higher bitrate 720p feed than the same at 1080p for what you tend to get over internet streams... upscaling in the device would be better than the relative feed per px stream... a good 3-5Mb stream for 720p is better than the same bitrate for 1080p. Once you clear 5+ Mb it starts to even out and move in favor of 1080p

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that saw it appear for a split second, then disappear? I was on my PS3 Friday and after I shut down Borderlands, I scrolled over to video and could have swore I saw Netflix flash on the screen for a second then it vanished. I had to do a "digital doubletake" and go back to look, but it was gone.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      They'll probably introduce some sort of online system that makes it extremely easy to chat online with your friends while in separate games or party up and find/join/party up with each other in the same games. That would be really helpful in competing with the PS3 finally catching up with netflix ;)

    5. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      For PS3 it requires 3.5 and I'll be complaining to my Attorney General about that later on today. Because while it's not Netflix's fault that Sony is being a dick about it, I don't think that Sony can legally take away features that have been there previously because you're not willing to update. As in I don't think they can take away the PSN access and require that you update in order to do things like watch Netflix movies.

      As for the Xbox360, no clue what firmware that's going to require. But supposedly the Wii is going to be similarly endowed.

    6. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I was actually shocked at how much better the 720p stream of Eureka was than the other day when I was watching it on my old TV. I know 720p isn't real HD, but it is impressive nonetheless and everything just seems to pop in a way that wasn't possible previously.

    7. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Their network, their EULA, their rules....just give up and update the PS3 already. And I'm saying that as someone who did have YDL on my PS3.

    8. Re:Finally something worth updating PS3? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      You have a very interesting outlook on life. Funny, buy interesting.

  7. Microsoft involved in the delay? by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder if Microsoft was somehow behind the delay since the xbox has had this for quite some time, its a decent part of the reason an xbox is sitting under my projector instead of a PS3, I didn't want to wait for a disk to watch my movies. What can I say, I'm impatient.

    1. Re:Microsoft involved in the delay? by hanabal · · Score: 1

      its commonly known among most gamers that microsoft did indeed had an agreement with netflix. If MS got their way the disks would never have existed, they were sort of to work around the contract with MS

    2. Re:Microsoft involved in the delay? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right, it always seemed odd to me that they needed to send a disc when the PS3 had the capacity to download the content directly. Didn't seem like it made much sense for them to waste the money sending out the discs.

  8. Disks Expiring by toleraen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Engadget is reporting that the disks will stop working after 31 days, however it's not clear if that's all disks or just those that downloaded the update.

    Anyone know for sure for those of us that are holding out for OtherOS?

    1. Re:Disks Expiring by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      Netflix sent me an e-mail indicating that they would no longer support the discs after 31 days.

      I won't miss the discs. The upgrade rocks.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:Disks Expiring by MichaelKristopeit+63 · · Score: 1

      i hate the discs... the flimsy sleeve completely spoils any attempt to arrange my media... i own a PS3 and a Wii because i don't want to deal with a company that would inflict such usability issues on USERS. i cringed hatred for microsoft every time i had to deal with either netflix disc. i can't fault netflix for taking the money... but paying to inflict such harm is inexcusable.

    3. Re:Disks Expiring by slinches · · Score: 1

      Engadget is reporting [engadget.com] that the disks will stop working after 31 days

      I hope that's not true and they'll allow the disks to be used indefinitely. I have a PS3 that's still on firmware 3.15 to keep Other OS and can't access PSN. Looks like a call to Netflix support is in order.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    4. Re:Disks Expiring by slinches · · Score: 1

      Responding to my own post to confirm that Netflix does plan on dropping support for the disk (on the PS3 at least, I didn't ask about other Blu-ray players).

      I'd like to urge anyone else who is in the same situation to call Netflix and request that support be continued for streaming on older PS3 firmware versions. The more people that contact them about this issue, the more justification they will have to make the effort and come up with a solution.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    5. Re:Disks Expiring by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I installed the Netflix channel on my Wii and now it refuses to use the disc version.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Disks Expiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You.... wait, you hate Microsoft because you value usability and they provide a better Netflix service for users... and it's somehow their fault that Netflix are willing to sell out on exclusivity or that they are too cheap to send out real plastic cases that fit nicely on your shelf? I hope you're being heavily sarcastic, I've seen some totured reasoning for a dislike of MS before, but this pretty much takes the biscuit.

    7. Re:Disks Expiring by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1
      Well my girlfriend tried using the Netflix disc last night and it told her to go download the installable version instead. I didn't see the message, perhaps it could have been skipped, but she left me with the impression the discs are already dead. She also noted the disc told her in big, bold font:

      Do Not Return This Disc To Netflix!

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    8. Re:Disks Expiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What can you say, some people are just idiots. I mean, to complain about a company and a service because of the sleeve the disc comes in? That's pretty ridiculous.

    9. Re:Disks Expiring by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You're screwed. Basically either give up the OtherOS feature or you don't get to stream. Last night when I tried it, I wasn't successful getting the disc to work. I may have missed something, but it wasn't working.

      In order to download the update you have to be logged into your PSN account, which means that you have to be running the 3.50 firmware. I recommend complaining to your Attorney General or whoever it is that is in charge of consumer complaints in your region. Given that Sony has been disabling features after purchase, I think a few complaints and they'll get their asses sued back into the stone age.

    10. Re:Disks Expiring by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Just do what everyone else did and buy a damn dvd box for it.

    11. Re:Disks Expiring by MichaelKristopeit+52 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      cowering is the most ridiculous.

      you are NOTHING

    12. Re:Disks Expiring by MichaelKristopeit+52 · · Score: 1
      i paid netflix for "discs in the mail, or instantly on your PC"... as i have a tivo HD or mac mini installed on every tv and projector i own, i don't need to use the service on my Wii or PS3, and netflix does not need to offer it to me... so if someone wants to pay them large sums of money to not provide me additional services that i don't require so netflix can strengthen their infrastructure... that's understandable.

      any company that would pay another company to deny service to a 3rd party company IS PATHETIC. microsoft is not providing a better service... THEY ARE PAYING FOR THE COMPETITION TO BE MADE UNABLE TO COMPETE. what are they afraid of? microsoft is not confident they would create and offer the best solution?

      ur mum's face takes the biscuit.

  9. Bandwidth Hog by Scorch_Mechanic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Losing the disk for the Wii is great, and the search function is something I've pined after for many an evening. However, Netflix has yet to address my biggest concern: Bandwidth usage.

    I'd like it if I had more control over how much of my pipes Netflix gets to use. Yes, I know I can diddle my router/modem to fix this, but it needs to be in the interface. Y'see, I play multiplayer FPS games (mostly TF2) during my downtime, which is co-incidentally the same time other people in the house have downtime. They'll load up the Netflix streaming player on their laptops, and my latency will double for thirty seconds. Which wouldn't be so bad, if Netflix didn't continue to hog the entire pipe for three quarters of a second every five seconds after the main load to update its buffer. Mix in the weird lag compensation Valve uses for TF2 and the relatively high latency values I get on my favorite server, and trying to use any strategy but sentry-humping turtling becomes impossible.

    Needless to say, this kinda ruins my entertainment. I've come a cease-fire agreement with the other parties in the house about usage periods and times, but the truce remains uneasy.

    --
    You should turn signatures off.
    1. Re:Bandwidth Hog by toleraen · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the time it took you to write this post you could have googled your router model + set up QOS and had the issue taken care of. I'll take Netflix's dynamic quality-change-based-on-available-bandwidth any day.

    2. Re:Bandwidth Hog by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 0, Interesting
      it already is in the interface... choose a lower quality setting.

      as for limiting bandwidth, that most certainly is a function of the router... any software solution on the other side of the router from the internet would be a less efficient hack.

    3. Re:Bandwidth Hog by MichaelKristopeit+66 · · Score: 1
      any software solution to lower bandwidth utilization of the player would require the player to request smaller chunks of data, and make requests more often... perceived lag in video games is a result of network latency, not bandwidth... the more numerous requests fighting for attention from the router might actually create more latency and perceived lag for you.

      limiting the bandwidth from the router would allow the software to communicate with the content server to much more accurately determine what the optimal solution is.

    4. Re:Bandwidth Hog by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could watch something with them? ;)

    5. Re:Bandwidth Hog by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, this kinda ruins my entertainment. I've come a cease-fire agreement with the other parties in the house about usage periods and times, but the truce remains uneasy.

      And it's stupid to have to do that when a simple technical fix would eliminate the conflict.

    6. Re:Bandwidth Hog by paganizer · · Score: 1

      The only problem I had with the Wii netflix was that, about 1/2 the time, my connection just goes flaky as hell, and the buffering system is simply stupid.
      I'm not sure what you are saying, but I think the problem here is their attempting to make everything workable by the most idiotic customers; we need advanced setting for those of us with non-standard and/or non-functioning connections.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    7. Re:Bandwidth Hog by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I love my tomato loaded wrt myself... My torrents and other large downloads don't interfere with my browsing and email.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    8. Re:Bandwidth Hog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the time it took you to write this post you could have googled your router model + set up QOS and had the issue taken care of. I'll take Netflix's dynamic quality-change-based-on-available-bandwidth any day.

      Totally agree. Sounds like he wants something that will need to be fiddled with on the Netflix player every single time someone's watching a movie while he's playing a game. OTOH, changing a few QoS values in the router once will resolve the problem for both parties and likely not have any negative impact on either his latency or the Netflix streaming quality.

    9. Re:Bandwidth Hog by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend watches Netflix all the time while I'm neglecting her for some TF2 action. I've never noticed a problem whatsoever on my 7mbit down, 0.5mbit up cable connection. On the other hand, bit torrent gets shut off with a fury.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    10. Re:Bandwidth Hog by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Make the changes on the router. You need QoS settings not some software hack in the netflix player.

    11. Re:Bandwidth Hog by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      The situation isn't that simple. I have QoS to my xbox for things like this, but it doesn't help when my wife uses netflix on her laptop because the system isn't as simple as you envision it. When my bandwidth use hits its cap (4Mb) for more than 1 second my ISP increases my latency. It is there way of punishing me for ... i dunno. Same thing happens when I torrent even on file with a limit of 10 connections (they must do packet inspection).

      Thankfully, my wife goes to bed before me, so I use that time to play any online multiplayer games with friends I've had since HS that now live across the east coast.

      Verizon DSL

    12. Re:Bandwidth Hog by CaseM · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be an "either-or". Netlix is taking the easy way out by just hogging the full pipe. It would be far better if they had allows for several, hard-coded speed tiers and, additionally, had a variable option that operates the same way it does now.

    13. Re:Bandwidth Hog by toleraen · · Score: 1

      I have to admit it's been a while since I set up QOS on my home router. I seem to recall setting up some very basic things:

      -Max download
      -Max upload
      -IP address, port number, priority level

      By setting the max download to 4Mb (pretty sure dd-wrt recommended 80% of max) it should limit your connection. At least that's what I saw on my router when I set the max up to low.

    14. Re:Bandwidth Hog by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      My QoS, is just priority. If I were able to limit max download that would probably work. Perhaps I should see if there is better firmware for my router that can help.

    15. Re:Bandwidth Hog by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      From my experiences, the movie-watching bandwidth will hurt your latency regardless of how much is being used unless you do QoS on the router.

      It would still be nice if Netflix let you select a bandwidth level, with caps coming and many people watching on TVs that aren't as high quality as the video Netflix is pushing.

  10. Stability by internic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the XBox 360 I'd simply take a client was a bit more stable. Heck, I'd probably even be willing to put in a disk. When I use the Netflix application, trying to fast forward or reverse more than a few seconds leads to probably about a 30% chance of being kicked out of the movie and back to the screen you were on when you selected it. What's more, it seems that most of the time this happens the software loses all record of where you were in the movie.

    I'm shocked that the player could have such a basic usability problem on known (locked down) hardware used by so many people. Hardware, I might add, where you have to be signed up for an extra pay service (XBox Live gold) in addition to your Netflix subscription and Internet service just to be able to watch the streaming movies.

    --
    "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    1. Re:Stability by Osty · · Score: 1

      When I use the Netflix application, trying to fast forward or reverse more than a few seconds leads to probably about a 30% chance of being kicked out of the movie and back to the screen you were on when you selected it.

      This sounds like network troubles. The only time I've ever seen that happen is when there are network issues either on my side or Netflix's. This is usually accompanied by the inability to stream at more than 2 bars when my connection otherwise can stream multiple Netflix HD streams at once. While it would be nice for the Xbox app to be a little bit more lenient with buffering, I'd much rather it die than sit forever trying to buffer when the network is all screwed up.

      Personally, I still find the Xbox interface the most pleasing out of the three. The PS3 interface is just too blocky and ugly, and the Wii app simply has no reason to exist. The only reason I'd even bother to use the PS3 app right now is because they have 1080p and DD5.1 streams while the Xbox doesn't (yet!), but on the other hand there's no UI indicator that a stream supports 1080p or DD5.1 (or even HD at all!).

    2. Re:Stability by MichaelKristopeit+66 · · Score: 1

      you sound like an idiot... a user interface failing ungracefully due to network troubles IS SOFTWARE TROUBLES. buffer issues do not eliminate the trivial potential to store a time index.

    3. Re:Stability by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      No reason for the Wii app to exist... except all those millions of homes that only have a Wii, and no PS3 or XBox 360. I mean really, why would NetFlix even bother to serve such a large market, anyways?

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    4. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      No reason for the Wii app to exist... except all those millions of homes that only have a Wii

      As I understand it, most homes that have a Wii also have a PC, and virtually all HDTVs have inputs for PC video.

    5. Re:Stability by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the XBox 360 I'd simply take a client was a bit more stable. Heck, I'd probably even be willing to put in a disk. When I use the Netflix application, trying to fast forward or reverse more than a few seconds leads to probably about a 30% chance of being kicked out of the movie and back to the screen you were on when you selected it.

      And on the PC, trying to seek to another location, even one which is included by the buffer, forces a rebuffer. Anyone notice that the common factor in both these pieces of shit is Microsoft?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Stability by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And most people still don't have HDTVs. And most HDTVs have input for HDMI, which the default PC doesn't put out audio over, requiring a separate cable and sometimes tricky setup... Never mind that the PC usually isn't in the same room as the family TV.

      Stop assuming even a small percentage of the public is even half as tech-savvy as the average slashdotter.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    7. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but most homes don't have their computer in the same room as the TV, and of those that do a lot don't have the required output/input on the computer/tv, and of those that do most don't know that it's even possible, and of those that know, most aren't sure how to set it up.

      And for the very select few left who DO have the computer in the room with the TV, DO have the required output/inputs, DO know how to hook it up and DO know how to enable it....most don't have a remote control to control their computer or want to get up and walk to the computer every time they need to pause, rewind, select a new video, etc.

    8. Re:Stability by delinear · · Score: 1

      Or that they even want the hassle when they are. I could rig up my PC to my TV, but I made the conscious choice not to do so for various reasons (being able to separate work time and relaxation time, being able to play games on the PC without hogging the main TV, not wanting an office desk in my living room, having the world's noisiest fan/case combo to name a few). For me it just makes sense to have a subset of my PC's media functionality on a device that's hooked up to my TV (and has a near-zero boot time when I want to watch something). Not to mention I have a console in the living room and one in the bedroom, I wouldn't want to have two PCs set up to do the same thing (note I don't actually use Netflix, but for other similar services this is also a nice, easy, out of the box setup). Sometimes, even as a geek, it's nice to be able to just plug in two cables and have something work.

    9. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but most homes don't have their computer in the same room as the TV

      I thought the whole point of a laptop was that it could be moved from room to room, and that the whole point of an ION nettop was that it could sit next to a TV without standing out.

      and of those that do a lot don't have the required output/input on the computer/tv

      I thought every HDTV worth anything had VGA and HDMI inputs. I'll grant that most people don't know about VGA to SDTV adapters, but as HDTVs replace worn-out SDTVs, they will become less necessary.

      and of those that do most don't know that it's even possible

      My Vizio 32" TV's box said "PC input". One doesn't even need to read the owner's manual.

      and of those that know, most aren't sure how to set it up.

      I want to help fix this, which is why I wrote this guide. Could you recommend improvements?

    10. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Wii is more family-room friendly, since it's controllable via a handsize device with a click of a button, and the unit itself is a little over handsized.
      PC is a hack when it comes to this kind of thing. Anything can be done with a PC, it's just not as elegant, nor practical.

    11. Re:Stability by cynyr · · Score: 1

      you know except that [HD] box next to the title.

      I have found that the quality of the new app to be lower than the disk, mainly becase my ps3 had all the post processing turned on for blue-ray content and thats what the ps3 disk was. Also I lost the ability to change the volume via the ps3 with the app. The UI is much much nicer though.

      Things like the pbs shows that are interlaced look really bad on my TV now, all of the angled lines are really jagged.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    12. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      A Wii is more family-room friendly, since it's controllable via a handsize device with a click of a button

      Apple makes a remote for Front Row on Mac mini, and XBMC on an ION nettop works with remotes as well.

      and the unit itself is a little over handsized.

      A Mac mini is roughly the same size as a Wii, as are many of the ION nettops.

      Anything can be done with a PC, it's just not as elegant, nor practical.

      What's not practical is getting non-major-label works onto a Wii.

    13. Re:Stability by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IF you have a laptop. And a place to set the laptop when it is connected to the TV. And something to do with the cable when the laptop is not connected to the TV. And you don't mind getting up and going to the laptop when you want to start/stop watching a movie. And no-one in the family (including yourself) ever wants to use the laptop while a movie is playing.

    14. Re:Stability by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an HDTV that didn't have RCA audio in for at least one DVI input. In fact, I've only see one HDTV ever that didn't have RCA audio in for all DVI, it had two with RCA in and two without.

      That doesn't mean that most people wouldn't set up a computer in their TV room, but audio input isn't the problem there, it's the fact they only have one PC

      And for some reason no one's selling, or at least not advertising, a wireless device where you hook up one end to a USB port, it switches all your sound and video over, and you hook the other end up to a DVI input and get computer on your TV. You could even combine it with wireless USB for a keyboard and mouse and remote control receiver.

      And then when you're done, you just unplug it and everything switches back to normal. Or put a button on it.

      Yes, I know wireless USB video cards and sound cards and hubs exist that let you actually do this, but no one seems to have put all of it together in a single device and actually market it as a 'set top' box that's half the price of real set top boxes and lets you play computer games and stuff, anything you can do on your PC. (And, of course, advertised as using for MS's silly MCE interface, but it's a piece of hardware, you could use whatever.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    15. Re:Stability by kgwilliam · · Score: 1

      And on the PC, trying to seek to another location, even one which is included by the buffer, forces a rebuffer. Anyone notice that the common factor in both these pieces of shit is Microsoft?

      I also noticed that the other common factor is Netflix. In fact, I also noticed that Netflix wrote both applications, and would presumably be responsible for any bugs and patches. But I applaud your efforts to drag Microsoft into an unrelated issue.

    16. Re:Stability by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, in this house we've got a Wii, PS3 and a Roku. It's wonderful because it means that we can have 3 different TVs hooked up at the same time. Admittedly we don't have that many, but I've got my PS3 hooked up via HDMI to my monitor, which makes for a much more pleasant viewing experience than the software player.

    17. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IF you have a laptop.

      Or an ION nettop, which costs not much more than a Wii.

      And no-one in the family (including yourself) ever wants to use the laptop while a movie is playing.

      On the other hand, what do you do when someone else in the family wants to play a video game while a movie is playing in Netflix on your Wii?

    18. Re:Stability by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Since there is one TV, it is not an issue. Not being able to play a game while someone else is watching TV is a concept even a three year old can understand. Not being able to check your email while someone is watching a movie is a concept only someone with an axe to grind would understand.

      The point is, different people have different requirements and usage patterns. Some already have (or are willing to get) a laptop to be used as a TV input device. Some already have (or are willing to get) a Wii. An intelligent company will try to meet both groups' requirements.

    19. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not being able to play a game while someone else is watching TV is a concept even a three year old can understand.

      "Can I pway on the compooder?"

      Some already have (or are willing to get) a laptop to be used as a TV input device. Some already have (or are willing to get) a Wii. An intelligent company will try to meet both groups' requirements.

      The problem is that the major PC game publishers aren't intelligent: there is only a token selection of video games designed for home theater PCs. There appears to be a catch-22: there are few HTPC games because there are few HTPCs and vice versa.

    20. Re:Stability by CaseM · · Score: 1

      Wireless connection? I'm betting so. I have no problem fast-forwarding movies when I'm hard-wired in.

    21. Re:Stability by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      My Vizio 32" TV's box said "PC input". One doesn't even need to read the owner's manual.

      I think you vastly overestimate people's ability and willingness to hook up AV equipment. I know that for around 80-90% of my friends, because I'm the "computer" guy, I get defaulted as the "AV" guy as well. And for these people it is too complicated TO PLUG IN RCA JACKS! Seriously. I get called for that problem more than anything.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    22. Re:Stability by CronoCloud · · Score: 0

      A Mac Mini also costs $699, a Wii costs $199.

      What's not practical is getting non-major-label works onto a Wii.

      No one cares, so enough already. Also, no one cares about same-screen multiplayer on the PC. Your obsessions, are not everyone elses.

      Now I understand your disability, and understand that you were once a babysitter who was probably without a lot of money to spend, and thusly probably played a lot of same-screen multiplayer games with your charges. But really, if you're not willing to do the steps necessary to become a Wii developer, then be silent about the matter. Fulfilling ones dreams requires work.

    23. Re:Stability by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You're a geek, most other people are not. The sooner you realize this, the better.

    24. Re:Stability by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Just ran a friend through hooking up a PS2 (via component) and a PS3 (via HDMI) to his new HDTV over the phone a few days ago.

      His wife is always worried about the PS2 and PS3 "messing up the internet" so refused to let him hook his PS3 up to PSN for a long time, she relented...but then had one of her friends redo the router's setup and refuses to give him the WPA key. And helping him set up his PSN account was an exercise in frustration, it would have been even worse had I not brought a USB keyboard over.

    25. Re:Stability by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, what do you do when someone else in the family wants to play a video game while a movie is playing in Netflix on your Wii?

      Aren't you forgetting multiple-TV/multiple device households? That's become more common because it prevents the "Johnny want's to play Star Raiders but I want to watch Little House on the Prairie" style arguments that have been around since the days of the Atari 2600 VCS. In many American households these days instead of everyone sitting in front of the TV for traditional "Prime time Network TV", everyone is off doing their own thing. One person might be watching Netflix or Starz on Demand on their TV, another might be playing Brain age on their DS, another might be using Facebook on a PC or laptop, another might be playing a FPS on their PS3 on another TV.

    26. Re:Stability by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the major PC game publishers aren't intelligent: there is only a token selection of video games designed for home theater PCs. There appears to be a catch-22: there are few HTPC games because there are few HTPCs and vice versa.

      Actually they're behaving quite intelligently. They want to make money so making a game for a platform that won't make them money is something they're not going to do.

      and a response to your sig:

      I hate game console DRM. Now how can my house guests play a video game with me?

      You give up, you get a game console, live with the restrictions, and quit whining about it.

    27. Re:Stability by internic · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Unfortunately the XBox is not in a convenient location to connect an ethernet cable. I guess maybe what one needs is a bridge that does some buffering of its own. :-) Regardless, of course, it's crazy that networking problems would cause it to crash and lose your place.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    28. Re:Stability by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't believe for a second that someone at Netflix whipped up the world's most visible Silverlight app without "help" from someone at Microsoft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Stability by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

      Oh God! I thought it was only me! I've taken to sitting at the frame that I want to resume for a few seconds before pressing play, but I think that is no more effective than the dead chicken I used to wave over it.

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard
    30. Re:Stability by tepples · · Score: 1

      Front Row on Mac mini, and XBMC on an ION nettop

      A Mac Mini also costs $699, a Wii costs $199.

      I've seen ION nettops at Best Buy of all places for $199.

      if you're not willing to do the steps necessary to become a Wii developer

      I want to get to a point where I can stop whining, but it'd be a lot easier if I knew of a reliable tutorial on how to start a business. Can you recommend something?

  11. Search? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

    Why did it take them until now to figure out that people might want to search through the selection of thousands of movies?

    1. Re:Search? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Search was one the disc-based version too

    2. Re:Search? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      ...shitty search of like 20 movies in each of 10 categories. If you want to actually search for something you have to whip out your PC/laptop/netbook/phone/iPad/iPod Touch, find it, add it to your queue, then switch back to the game console to press play. That was apparently inconvenient.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Search? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, there was a full text based search in the PS3 disc.. while the UI wasn't very intuitive.. the search was there. You just didn't care enough to look for it.

    4. Re:Search? by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      It was inconvenient. So much so, that I've only watched one movie on the Wii (most of the items in my queue aren't available streaming). With this upgrade, I'll probably give Netflix on the Wii another chance.

    5. Re:Search? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      There was a search in the PS3 version, it was sort of hidden. Personally, I just used the PS3's web browser.

    6. Re:Search? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I can look really closely at the PS3 disc for hours but can't discern the search functionality from the shiny reflective squares. Without a PS3 that's the best I can manage.

      The Wii version, on the other hand, did not have a search function. This thread is about both but you just didn't care enough to notice.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:Search? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I watch a lot of low-grade sci fi films. The Wii disc version had reasonable genre queues that are mostly sufficient. I have a laptop within arms reach at any point as well, so it wasn't a big deal.

      So far my biggest dislike of the new integrated Netflix channel on my Wii is that it seems to include a lot more films I've already seen in its genre suggestions. I wish there was a flag I could set to remove things I've already watched from all the queues (except the "Recently Watched" queue and maybe a "Watch Your Favorites Again" queue).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  12. W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping something like this would happen. The CD drive (can I call it a CD-ROM?) failed and was replaced with a new unit. I have not yet had a chance to try replacing the drive... but this means I can add streaming to the TV in the bedroom. While it seems the Wii only plays games when my little one has friends over, it gets used for Netflix on a regular basis.

    1. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      The CD drive (can I call it a CD-ROM?)

      No, because it's a DVD-ROM drive. I hear Nintendo continually denies it, but Wii drives can and do read DVDs.
      Just install the Homebrew Channel and MPlayer CE, stick in a DVD, and off you go.

    2. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by tepples · · Score: 1

      Wii drives can and do read DVDs

      Nintendo optical discs have a slightly different sector layout from DVD-ROM. Reading standard DVD-ROM requires a debug mode in the drive's firmware that apparently Nintendo has since removed from newly manufactured consoles.

    3. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      But it's certainly not a CD drive. It's a crippled DVD drive.

    4. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      But it's certainly not a CD drive. It's a crippled DVD drive.

      It certainly is a CD drive as well as a crippled DVD drive; its conceivable that a "crippled" DVD drive might be crippled in such a way as to not be a CD drive, but normal DVD drives are CD drives and the one in the Wii is not crippled in a way that changes that.

    5. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Sure if you want to call my blu-ray disc a CD drive because it can read CDs.

    6. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Only on older Wiis. Or at least, I was never able to use these DVD playing hacks.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    7. Re:W00t! Glad I did not toss out the broken Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wii DVD drives aren't meant to stream content, like a movie, from the disc. They're designed for burst read, so while, yes, it can be done with the HBC, and MPlayer CE, I wouldn't recommend it. Better to buy yourself a $20 DVD player from Wal-Mart, and call it a day.

  13. I prefer using WiiMC by Dh2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It might be a little rough around the edges, but I'm limited only by whatever media I have stored on my FTP server, SD Card or USB drive. Being able to view videos from Youtube and listen to Shoutcast streams is pretty nice as well.

    http://www.wiimc.org/

    Sure, you need to install the Homebrew Channel first, but that's easy enough.

  14. Alternate Audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does "alternate audio tracks" include RiffTrax? Because I would be all over that.

  15. Thanks Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I credit Apple with the UI improvements - the tivo, ps3 and wii all worked, just not well. With the new apple tv you can search for a movie and then watch it. Leave it to Steve to point out the obvious.

  16. What about XB360? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah it's functional.... but search plx? okthxbai!

    1. Re:What about XB360? by ashridah · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Xbox is getting it in the november update, if i remember the reviews correctly.

  17. Bring back the scroll bars! (Wii version) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there's something I miss transitioning from the disc to an installable app, it's the horizontal scroll bar I could grab with the Wii Remote and quickly scroll through my Instant Queue.

    With 100+ entries in my queue, it's a pain-in-the-ass having to hold left/right to get to a movie/show located around the center of the queue. Yes, I know I can "fling" the remote left/right and release the button to "dash" through my queue, but it still doesn't scroll as much as it should, and it's awkward in execution to actually do it in the first place.

    Other than that, nice to finally ditch the disc and I have long yearned for the search feature.

  18. Movie studios make money from Netflix by tepples · · Score: 1

    And of course you'll get the *.A.As ALL on the side of the duopoly, because they know with no bandwidth piracy will drop to almost nothing in the USA.

    True, without bandwidth, there can't be widespread movie piracy over BitTorrent. But without bandwidth, studios in the MPAA can't earn royalties from Netflix either.

    1. Re:Movie studios make money from Netflix by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      And of course you'll get the *.A.As ALL on the side of the duopoly, because they know with no bandwidth piracy will drop to almost nothing in the USA.

      True, without bandwidth, there can't be widespread movie piracy over BitTorrent. But without bandwidth, studios in the MPAA can't earn royalties from Netflix either.

      Not only that, but the people currently pirating won't turn legit - they'll do something else.

    2. Re:Movie studios make money from Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't.

      Netflix buys the rights with a small, one time payment for streaming content. There are no per view royalties.

  19. I'd need to buy a new router for that by tepples · · Score: 1

    the time it took you to write this post you could have googled your router model + set up QOS

    Google WGR614 QOS or WGR614 custom firmware shows that the stock firmware doesn't support it, and unlike the WGR614L, the WGR614 has only 1 MB of RAM, into which the vast majority of custom firmwares don't fit.

    1. Re:I'd need to buy a new router for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google WGR614 QOS or WGR614 custom firmware shows that the stock firmware doesn't support it, and unlike the WGR614L, the WGR614 has only 1 MB of RAM, into which the vast majority of custom firmwares don't fit.

      Which makes more sense? Spending 20-50 bucks to get a router that will allow you to do that? Or demanding that every single company that releases a computer program that uses bandwidth provide an interface to allow you to adjust that bandwidth usage? From the OP's post, he apparently has enough knowledge of exactly what programs are utilizing what resources that the change should be pretty simple for him to make. If he refuses to do so, it's purely out of sheer stubbornness.

  20. The Wii Could Already Search Netflix by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    It does, after all, have a web browser. I use it all the time. You can rather painlessly switch between the Netflix streaming app (for watching movies) and the web browser (for searching for movies to stream).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  21. If you don't like DVDs then quit ordering them. by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

    You know they send you DVDs because they're in your request queue, right? Empty your queue and send the disk back. Problem solved!

  22. Tivo to follow Suit? by jchawk · · Score: 1

    I have both a PS3 and a Tivo and I'll definitely be using my PS3 more for streaming now. I'm hoping that someone at Tivo gets a clue and pushes for updates to the Netflix client on their devices. I love my Tivo's but the Netflix client is absolutely terrible.

    Tivo if you read slashdot update your damn client!!! :-P

  23. Solved the Wii disc with USBLoaderGX by technik · · Score: 1

    I've already solved the Netflix disc problem (and the scratched disc problem... I have kids)
    with HBC and USBLoaderGX. The USBLoaderGX channel made it easy for the rest of
    the family.

    The question I have, and can't find answered anywhere, is will the Wii disc version
    continue to work?

  24. homebrew channel on wii did it by SafeMode · · Score: 1

    Anyone with homebrew setup can install the disc like any game to a usb harddrive and already run disc-less. You can even make main "channels" that directly launch it seamlessly through the homebrew channel like any other game you have installed. I haven't used a disc for any of my wii games since installing the homebrew channel.

    Nintendo may be anti-hacking but at least they haven't done anything shady like disable the homebrew channel after it's been installed. That channel is the only reason why my wii gets used (dont own any other game systems or play pc games either).

  25. Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How big is this update? I'm already saving Rock Band songs on an SD card, having filled my Wii with games and downloads; I don't see how swapping out cards is any more convenient than swapping disks.

  26. This news bothers me. by assertation · · Score: 1

    This is great news, but it bothers me. As a Linux user I can't use Netflix's streaming content, despite being a paying customer. I've watched many movies and television shows on hulu.com with no problems. There are no technical issues, Netflix just doesn't have a problem with giving the middle finger to some of their paying customers.

    1. Re:This news bothers me. by OneFix · · Score: 1

      Hulu uses Flash and does not apply DRM to any of their streams. Netflix had to add DRM to stream to the desktop, so they had to go with Silverlight...so, it's the MPAA that you have to thank for that. On the other hand, embeded systems like Roku, XBox, and most likely PS3 and Wii are able to receive the stream without the DRM, so there might be hope yet.

    2. Re:This news bothers me. by assertation · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      I've been thinking about going Mac after my Ubuntu box dies. I had my box custom built with good parts and it is still running extremely well after a large number of years so there is time to wait to see if this happens.

  27. What about DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this slashdot? Aren't we all against DRM? Isn't this thing chock full to the brim with DRM? Just wondering.

  28. HDTV penetration has hit 65 percent by tepples · · Score: 1

    And most people still don't have HDTVs.

    It was two-thirds by May. A home user can't even buy a new SDTV anymore. In your area, when an SDTV breaks, do people replace it with an HDTV, or do they hit the thrift store for a second-hand SDTV?

    And most HDTVs have input for HDMI, which the default PC doesn't put out audio over, requiring a separate cable

    What on this page about setting up an HTPC is confusing?

    1. Re:HDTV penetration has hit 65 percent by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      What on this page about setting up an HTPC is confusing?

      It's not, for a geek at least. But what you don't understand is that most people simply don't want to hook up their computer to the TV. Let me say that again: Most non-geek people simply have no desire to hook up their computer to their TV"

      You also don't seem to understand that for some people, their computer is a desktop machine...sitting in another room. For others, they might have a laptop, but aesthetics are an issue. Perhaps one day you'll understand the issue of a non-geek wife objecting to nerd cables and clutter in the living room.

  29. Microsoft's legal stranglehold ended by admica · · Score: 1

    This innovation is due to legal rather than technological reasons. I'm happy Netflix found a workaround to get service to me earlier than this. http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/xbox-officially-the-only-console-able-to-stream-netflix-sorry/

  30. When Does Netflix Come To Linux? by assertation · · Score: 1

    When does netflix come to linux?

    Hulu.com has no problem streaming movies to linux users, why does Netflix?

    1. Re:When Does Netflix Come To Linux? by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Because it runs on Silverlight and Microsoft refuses to offer the necessary parts of their DRM stack to Moonlight.

  31. PS3 Other OS by ruthless+reader · · Score: 1

    To install the Netflix app, the PS3 firmware needs to be up-to-date. So PS3 owners who have not updated their firmware so that they do not loose the "Other OS" option will not be able to install the Netflix app. To make matters worse, the Netflix disc will stop working after 30 days. The only way to use Netflix on PS3 is to update the firmware.

  32. Netflix selection sucks in Canada by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    Netflix USA and Netflix Canada are two very different things, as far as content goes.

    First, let me say that what Netflix is doing is really great. They offer their services on a lot of devices and their streaming-only service in Canada is only 8$CAD per month. I'm sure all the competition is scared of Netflix, especially the cables companies. I can't wait to see them try to lower our already-low monthly caps to try and stop Netflix from gaining ground. I even bet the CRTC will stay silent and do nothing when it happens.

    Second, a quick comment about their use of SilverLight for their computer streaming. A lot of people switched to Mac to stop using Microsoft software. A non-Silverlight native program for Mac OS X would solve that problem. It doesn't have to be in a damn browser window. But since I own an iPod touch, a Wii and the new Apple TV, I still have plenty of choices for viewing Netflix, so that SilverLight problem is easy to go around. Not everyone has that many choices though, so the sooner they can drop SilverLight, the better. Linux users are completely left out for now.

    Third, the major problem with Netflix Canada is the selection itself. I don't know if it's the CRTC, the Canadian television networks or some other legal thing but the choice of content is extremely limited. And when I say extremely, I'm not kidding.

    How about current TV shows? Not only are these not available, but even the previous years:
    - American Dad, Chuck, The Cleveland Show, Doctor Who (except the classic series), Eureka, Family Guy, Futurama, Robot Chicken, The Simpsons, South Park, Stargate Universe, V (original and new series), Warehouse 13.

    Would I be happy with older TV shows? Sure, if the list was good enough.
    - Better Off Ted, Cheers, Corner Gas, Seinfeld, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis are not available.

    The only TV series I was happy to see in the list was Heroes. Too bad NBC cancelled it before we had a proper ending.

    What about old movies? A quick search gave me these results:
    - 12 Monkeys, Coneheads, Dark City, Dune, Gattaca, Lord of War, Lost in Space, Pitch Black, Shaun of the Dead are available
    - Ace Ventura, Aliens, Army of Darkness, Blade Runner, Galaxy Quest, Ghostbusters, Groundhog Day, Mars Attacks!, Men in Black, The Naked Gun, Office Space, Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Predator, Soylent Green, Stargate, Terminator (except T2) and Spaceballs are not available.

    So what is available, exactly? Not a lot. Forget recent box-office movies. If it's recent you most probably never even heard of it and if it's old it's really, really old. Go ahead, try to search your favorite movies and TV shows. You'll be disappointed.

    As things are now, I cancelled my free one-month membership before it was even over. But as soon as Netflix Canada gets a half-decent selection, I'm restarting my membership.

  33. Upgrade required by maddoxej · · Score: 1

    I tried it last night. It works great. The only downside is that I had to let the wii upgrade its firmware so that I could access the shop. That took it 20 minutes and it will prevent running homebrew apps.

  34. Still slow by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    Not having to put in the disk is a big convenience, but it is still very slow to start up. I timed it at 42 seconds, compared to 6 seconds to enter Netflix on AppleTV. A big improvement is that the display of the queue shows 10 titles at once, which is twice as many as most Netflix clients (although AppleTV shows 21), which makes it easier to browse a large queue. The info pop-up for the selected title is a nice touch, although I wish it showed more than 3 lines. Scrolling is very fast, although I found it difficult to control with the analog joystick. It always seemed to be either too fast or too slow--I think the sensitivity of the joystick could stand some tweaking. Unfortunately, the images can't keep up with the fast scrolling, so you have to stop to let the cover pictures catch up. Performance seems fine. I found one title in my queue that had Dolby 5.1, indicated by an annotation on the info screen.

  35. Linux next? by tebeka · · Score: 1

    Does it means I can expect Netflix on Linux soon? I can't believe that nobody hacked that so far.

    --
    -- Miki Tebeka The only difference between children and adults is the price of the toys.
  36. Re:Bring back the scroll bars! (Wii version) by norminator · · Score: 1

    I haven't updated my Wii yet (and I'm using NetFlix on my Blu-Ray player these days instead of the Wii), but it seems like you could scroll a page at a time using the + and - buttons. Does that work on the installable version?

  37. Let me know when I can actually log in by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    It looks like they borked their login code somehow since it refuses to log me in, despite the fact that the exact same username/password is working fine for me on my desktop and iPhone. It says it can't find an account with matching information, so I don't know if the issue is with the "+" in my e-mail address (you would not believe how many sites have issues with that) or what it might be.

  38. Let's talk wife acceptance factor by tepples · · Score: 1

    Perhaps one day you'll understand the issue of a non-geek wife objecting to nerd cables and clutter in the living room.

    Then wouldn't an ION nettop have a wife acceptance factor at least as high as that of a Wii console? Khyber, hairyfeet, Cwix, and h4rr4r appear to agree.

    1. Re:Let's talk wife acceptance factor by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Selection bias. They're nerds posting on slashdot, who probably have other nerds for friends. Non-nerds simply have no desire to hook up their PC to their TV.

      It's kind of like how one might get the impression from reading slashdot that everybody and their dog who had a PS3 had Linux on it. But the number of PS3 owners doing so is actually very small.

  39. Mutatis mutandis by tepples · · Score: 1

    Netflix buys the rights with a small, one time payment for streaming content.

    I was not aware of that. If that is the case, then please allow me to rephrase:

    But without bandwidth, studios in the MPAA can't earn sizable one-time payments from Netflix for new films.

  40. Messing around behind the TV by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wii DVD drives aren't meant to stream content, like a movie, from the disc.

    Then why is a movie's worth of cut scenes stored on the Super Smash Bros. Brawl disc?

    Better to buy yourself a $20 DVD player from Wal-Mart, and call it a day.

    I've learned that some people have problems merely hooking up yellow, white, and red, and would have to make an appointment for a geek relative to show up and hook up the DVD player only to find that the TV's inputs are filled with the cable box and the Wii console.