Black Silicon Used For Surveillance?
An anonymous reader writes "For the past decade, 'black silicon' has been touted as a way to make super-sensitive image sensors and ultra-efficient solar cells. That's because the material — silicon wafers treated with sulfur gases and femtosecond laser pulses — is much better at absorbing photons and releasing electrons than conventional silicon, at least over certain wavelengths. In 2008, Harvard spinoff SiOnyx went public with its plans to commercialize black silicon. But what happened to those plans? Today SiOnyx revealed in another exclusive that it has raised new venture financing from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and other big investors. It also has formed a key strategic partnership to scale up manufacturing of black silicon — and go after markets in security, surveillance, automotive, consumer devices, and medical imaging."
I think black silicon is less productive, despite all the effort we've put into giving it a chance based on historical misuse and underuse. Basically, it doesn't have the right bond valency to adequately function in our society, so we really ought to let the markets sort of segregate so that people who prefer white silicon can go there without having to worry about intermixing.
But having some years as lab physicist, could someone add if the S is SF6, and at what lambda? At what W over what area?
Why is black silicon being used in security and surveillance significant? Title should read more like "Paul Allen and others invest in Black Silicon."
"Black Silicon Kills Babies!"
An objective test is required. I suggest a sample of ten babies of the same weight.
Drop a 200KG slug of Black Silicon from a height of two meters on five of them, then drop a 200KG slug of White Silicon on the other five. High-speed video could monitor plastic deformation and splatter.
"This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
The article states the this allows people to see where they have previously been blind. Obviously the speaker means that people cannot see in the dark and this gives them this ability. I wonder how this compares to standard night vision technology which sounds like it does the same or similar thing.
I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
To be Politically Correct, you must call it African American Silicon.
You should never call prople like Desmond Tutu a Black. He must be called an African American.
So, the color of his skin gives him American citizenship?
If you really want to phrase it this way, he must be called an "African South African" which seems to be the epitome of redundancy...
Also, I had no idea he was a "prople".
You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
I'm getting my Ph.D researching black silicon. If you have science or engineering questions about it, post them in reply to this comment. I'll check back at around 3 PM EST and will do my best to answer the questions I find then.
I mean, "black" silicone doing surveillance? The conspiracy nuts will have a blast with it!
Why would we care about the color? Guy's like us don't get near fake boobs.
So, the color of his skin gives him American citizenship?
If you really want to phrase it this way, he must be called an "African South African" which seems to be the epitome of redundancy...
Also, I had no idea he was a "prople".
You are definately a racist, according to th PC crowd. Anyone who has extra-dark skin, or is distantly related to someone who might have had such a condition, cannot be called Black, or any other term relating to their skin color, or their ancesters skin color. The only approved term is "African American". Until other terms have been added to the PC lexicon, that is the only term available to us. So nationality is not a barrier. Tutu has been reported to be African American in numerous magazine articles, so that should be considered official canon.
Now, if those European Americans in Germany, with the help of the Japanese Americans in Japan, would have left the Jewish Americans alone in WWII, they would have already taken over the world and enslaved us all, making all this anti racist PC business moot. Now all we have the Jewish Americans in Israel fighting with the Arab Americans in Gaza, and nobody is getting busy with the enslavement.
Woosh!
Free Martian Whores!
Um, I think they just applied it to your comment.
Free Martian Whores!
Well, now you're just inducing selection bias. What if all babies who weigh 5 kilos have a splatter radius of only 0.2 meter, and all babies that weigh 7 kilos have a splatter radius of 2 meters? Then your objective test would be inherently flawed as to the predicted result of dropping a 200 kg slug of silicon on a baby.
What we need to do is to take a random sample of babies, of sufficient number compared to the total population of babies to achieve a low margin of error, split them into a control and a test group, and *then* drop the slugs of silicon on them.
Oh, also, for true statistical rigor, make sure to stab the babies with a pencil in both eyes first to ensure the study is double-blind.
"Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
You are definately a racist, according to th PC crowd.
Who exactly are this "PC crowd" who state that *all* black people (as opposed to American ones) are "African American"?
While there probably *are* some people who genuinely espouse the stereotypical "gone mad"-type political correctness, a lot of it appears to be strawman-type misrepresentation and assumption by those who disagree with it, or just assume that something is going to be the case. Oh, interesting article here, by the way.
Anyone who has extra-dark skin, or is distantly related to someone who might have had such a condition, cannot be called Black, or any other term relating to their skin color, or their ancesters skin color. The only approved term is "African American".
Well, in the US perhaps.
Tutu has been reported to be African American in numerous magazine articles, so that should be considered official canon.
Why does that follow or make it "official"? It could simply mean that the article writers were simply over-sensitive to the *perceived* wishes of others (and desire not to be seen as causing offense).
:-)
Or it could be that they were simply stupid and/or lazy.
Or all of the above.
"Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).