Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Unbundles Software For NY City

doishmere writes "Microsoft has agreed to sell individual pieces of software to NY City workers, rather than forcing each seat to buy a full suite of software. The city has created three classes of users based on which pieces of software they need to perform their job, and Microsoft will sell software packages tailored to each class at a reduced price."

131 comments

  1. The Key Is by DannyO152 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Getting money for something someone else has done. The NYC employees uses a Mac or LibreOffice, it matters not, Microsoft still collects.

    1. Re:The Key Is by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Getting money for something someone else has done. The NYC employees uses a Mac or LibreOffice, it matters not, Microsoft still collects.

      Paradoxically, NY city "saves" 50 mils in 5 years. WTF?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has Mac products (whether they suck or not), but everyone I know runs the Windows versions in Parallels anyway. At any rate I doubt NYC has many Macs in use.

      OpenOffice is, frankly, garbage. LibreOffice I haven't used, but is still in beta with only a few 100k downloads so I doubt it's been deployed in a large city.

      Microsoft's Office software is actually pretty good and, yes, I would buy a closed-source linux version if they sold it. For the moment I use Crossover Office which, although somewhat erratic, is still a walk in the park compared to the dung-heap that is OpenOffice.

      It would be better for the world if Microsoft just focussed on that and got out of the operating system-monopoly business. It might actually even be better for Microsoft in the long-term, and I suspect it's what's going to happen eventually.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:The Key Is by froggymana · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know that you can run Microsoft Office 2007 in Wine, right? It works very well and I have never had any problems with it on Linux. You just have to install a few extra things, but thats fairly easy with wine-tricks. I do a fair amount of things in it for school.

      I haven't tried Microsoft Office 2010 yet though, so its hard for me to say if it works or not.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    4. Re:The Key Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that CrossOver Office is Wine with a few hack patches and a proprietary front end added to make it more user friendly? Apparently not.

      [CrossOver is from Codeweavers who fund development of Wine so it's a "legit" closed package version]

    5. Re:The Key Is by randallman · · Score: 1

      Because it's not how much you spent, it's how much you saved!

    6. Re:The Key Is by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Oh, at first I thought you were describing the city itself, which collects regardless of what it does. Ironic that they are angry at being treated the same by Microsoft.

    7. Re:The Key Is by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice is, frankly, garbage. LibreOffice I haven't used, but is still in beta with only a few 100k downloads so I doubt it's been deployed in a large city.

      Really? How long did you use it? I've been using it for several years and have had less problems with it than with MS Office. Even my non-computer savvy wife used it for several years writing term papers and book reports for her masters degree. Your follow up statement about LibreOffice tells me you don't know that much about either OpenOffice or LibreOffice. They are one in the same - OpenOffice became LibreOffice after it split from under Oracle(nee Sun)'s wing.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    8. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Crossover Office is wine, except they take care of everything for you for a relatively small price. (It takes me less time to earn the $ to pay for cxoffice than to get wine working on even one tricky software.)

      Since cxoffice is a legit contributor to wine I'm even supporting open source at the same time.

      Thanks for the pointer about wine-tricks though, always good to know alternatives.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    9. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I've used it plenty. I have memories of when OpenOffice was good, and this seems to be backed up by many people. On the other hand, maybe my standards just improved or, more likely, Microsoft and Apple have actually improved their stuff while OpenOffice is still bloating up their clone of Office 97 or whatever.

      I just downloaded LibreOffice after replying to this post (note: when you have something that actually works, like Microsoft Office, you don't have to bother trying every "new" office suite in the hopes of getting something usable...). That said, I'm impressed by its speed, and it does seem cleaner than OpenOffice at least at first. Its dialog boxes are still a cluttered horrible mess, but whatever. OO seems to have money behind it; they'd be better off "wasting" some of it on a strong user-interface team rather than more developers. Seriously.

      I'll try putting together a slideshow and spreadsheet with it. It's not as pretty or user-friendly as MS Office but, yeah, it's worth giving it a shot.

      I write all my papers in emacs and LaTeX, so I don't care about the word processor.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    10. Re:The Key Is by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice is, frankly, garbage.

      Care to elaborate?

    11. Re:The Key Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you care to give a sensible definition of "user friendly"?

      In fact I think that user friendliness often turns out to be "what you are already used too".

      It's always easier to do what you already know how to do than learn something new.

      That's why software companies who have leading market position are emphasizing "user friendliness" so much. It means "since you are used to our product why look for new products you will anyway have to learn to use? just use ours and don't bother".

      The exception would be a clone product with the same buttons with the same labels in the same osition doung exactly the same things in the same way...Boring..wasteful.

    12. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Then you would be wrong. I can't give you a rigorous definition but despite years of experience with OpenOffice.org, after just a few hours I found the Microsoft Ribbon to be better 95% of the time (here's a clue: what matters is for the usual stuff be easily accessible). This isn't to say the Ribbon is the only way, or even the best, but yeah it's a lot better than the 23 tabs, 3 rows deep, of dialog box that OO.o throws at me. I'm happy to give experimental and promising stuff several hours of learning curve-time, whoever the vendor.

      As I said, for serious work I use LaTeX. For throwing a presentation together with the least effort, that doesn't look like dog shit, MS Office clobbers OO.o. That's what I mean by user friendliness. I'd love nothing more than for OO.o to do something totally out there and crazy. OO.o could be doing something really experimental; I know plenty of UI academics who'd love sticking it to Microsoft and working on a good project for token funding. But no, they're just bloating up Office 97.

      I don't understand. Critics say that Microsoft Office both uses user-friendliness as lock-in and then alienates its users with the Ribbon. Which one is it?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    13. Re:The Key Is by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      At any rate I doubt NYC has many Macs in use

      Only in the schools. (There are only about 1,600 of those.)

    14. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      And is the NYC Department of Education paying for Microsoft Office for those computers and not using it?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    15. Re:The Key Is by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Slow. Unstable. Ugly. Inconsistent (try saving a complex OOImpress document as a PDF). Rife with internecine politics.

      Hopefully LibreOffice fixes some of this. It'll still be ugly, but the rest may be fixed and that might be enough.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    16. Re:The Key Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honey!
      Honey!
      I saved $100 at a 10% off sale!

  2. Re:Microsoft by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's impressive that you typed that well thought out post (your first post, no less!) all in one minute after the story was made public, despite lack of a subscriber account. It's almost like you knew beforehand that this story was going to appear and wanted to get some pro MS sentiment in before anyone else had a chance to say anything..! How much were you paid for that, exactly?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  3. can't access without an nytimes account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quicker to read learn more about this from a simple search or two:

    http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&hl=en&tbs=nws%3A1&source=hp&q=Microsoft+new+york+city&btnG=Search

    http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=microsoft+new+york+city&go=&form=QBNR&qs=n&sk=&sc=5-19

  4. Re:Microsoft by bhcompy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, at least he's right about Visual Studio(as far as Windows is concerned). The fact that the Express version is free AND comes with a free implementation of MSSQL only cements it in because it is the entry point, it's free, and it's what everyone uses in lower division college courses. No better way to lock in your market

  5. Re:Class? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but it does include me kicking your teeth you.

  6. Re:NY is a freakn corrupt cesspool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Big cities are shit by nature.

  7. Clippy says: by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like you're shilling for Microsoft. Would you like to:

    * Talk about how Microsoft solutions are enterprise ready
    * Bash Google and/or Apple for no apparent reason
    * Mention the hidden costs of open source
    * Cleverly forget to mention Microsoft disasters such as Bob, the Zune, Windows Mobile, or Vista

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good grief!!!! You say something nice about MS around here and you're immediately attacked.

      Just what the heck is wrong with you people anyway.

    2. Re:Clippy says: by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have seen how this company operates over many years.

      Saying something nice is fine, posting an obvious premade shill piece is not.

    3. Re:Clippy says: by Dancindan84 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What, was ME just too below the belt?

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Clippy says: by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Dont forget they took the music away and the phone data was "lost" too.
      Add in the world wide help to seek out dissidents.
      Back in the US is just about lockin and cost savings :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zune wasn't a big seller, but it wasn't a terrible product either. Too late to the party.

      Bob? Ok that was 15 years ago, which is like 105 in computer years. Let it go.

      Windows Mobile? Wasn't a disaster when it came out. But barely updating it over the course of 5 years (35 computer years) was a big mistake.

      Vista? Yeah, that sucked.

    6. Re:Clippy says: by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It looks like you're shilling for Microsoft. Would you like to:

      * Talk about how Microsoft solutions are enterprise ready
      * Bash Google and/or Apple for no apparent reason
      * Mention the hidden costs of open source
      * Cleverly forget to mention Microsoft disasters such as Bob, the Zune, Windows Mobile, or Vista

      Just once I would like to see a +5 accusation of shilling include a solid rebuttal.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Clippy says: by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      * Cleverly forget to mention Microsoft disasters such as Bob, the Zune, Windows Mobile, or Vista

      My favorite in this category is still the disaster that TradeElect was. Remember all the marketing / ads that were run with this saying LSE decided to use SQLServer? Wonder why they did not do the same when the whole thing went down the crapper and the whole platform got dumped.

    8. Re:Clippy says: by randallman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's actually a really good point. I suspect there may be a correlation between age and views about MS. In fact, I'm sure that luring in young developers (counting on them not knowing MS history) is on their agenda.

      Over the past 15 years, I've gone from pro-MS to agnostic to "avoid when possible" based largely on their behavior. But young developers don't know about DR-DOS, Netscape, MS JVM, or even the recent OOXML fiasco. So for those that don't understand the reasons for the seemingly automatic negative responses, a single action doesn't eclipse an entire history or even come close to meaning that they've "changed" as the shill put it.

      If MS wants to gain respect, they've got to consistently play nice. That means supporting standards instead of trying to own them. That means playing nice instead of trying to lock out competitors with their monopolies. But I really can't see this happening unless they are broken up or they lose enough market share so that they're forced to compete on merit. They're too addicted to their current business of locking in customers and leveraging their monopolies.

    9. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence and logic does not a paranoid conspiracy theory make.

    10. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've tried. Every time they do, Slashdot groupthink blasts them for it. "Oh, MS opened up code for X, but it must be a trap! If we try and use it they'll sue us!". "Look, MS joined the Z open standards group. We should throw them out, clearly they are only there to Ebrace, Extend, Extinguish".

      The problem is not with MS, but with wildy paranoid, probably schizophrenic, conpsiracy theory nuts who think everything "evil" corporations or governments do must be some kind of plan to attack them and their freedoms personally. And this is why most civilised countries have tight gun laws.

      Well either they're crazy, or they're paid anti-MS shills, that seems to be the popular accusation for disputing a point these losers don't agree with.

    11. Re:Clippy says: by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the "MS can't change because /. readers bash it for its history of, shall we say, less than ethical behavior" argument. [sarcasm]Yeah, /. readers have real influence. They have so much power over MS that MS can't become an ethical organization because of what /. readers have to say about its past..... [/sarcasm]

      I can't believe anyone made that ridiculous argument. Just who would have made such an argument? Why, another MS shill of course. I doubt anyone else could have been that desperate.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    12. Re:Clippy says: by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not me. Over the past 30 years, I've gone from pro-MS to agnostic to "avoid when possible" based largely on their software. I just don't like being forced to do things "the Microsoft way". I don't like the way they change stuff from version to version for no apparent reason. I don't like the planned obsolescence. I don't like the way they handle security.

      I do like Excel -- or at least, I liked Excel 2000. Not so happy about 2003 or 2007, but Excel is still better from other spreadsheets I've tried. But that's about it.

    13. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Cleverly forget to mention Microsoft disasters such as Bob, the Zune, Windows Mobile, or Vista

      My favorite in this category is still the disaster that TradeElect was. Remember all the marketing / ads that were run with this saying LSE decided to use SQLServer? Wonder why they did not do the same when the whole thing went down the crapper and the whole platform got dumped.

      Southwest Securities, Inc. has been on MS SQL for over 10 years... When I worked for them (1998-2001) they were processing more transactions per second than Oracle could at the time. Things might be different now. Just saying "they used SQL Server" doesn't mean shit to me really. There had to have been something more than just the database server sucking, as you implied.

      Fucking FOSS shill. That's the most hilarious thing to me. You don't even get paid to be a shill. Kinda leads me to believe you're retarded.

    14. Re:Clippy says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Cleverly forget to mention Microsoft disasters such as Bob, the Zune...

      Bob, the Zune?!

      Damn it, don't scare people like that! Now I've got to go change my pants.

    15. Re:Clippy says: by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      They must have used the MS data exporting tools while your former employer probably used some trhird party tools. Or your employer didn't need to translate string encodings.

      On itself MS SQL ins't that bad. Just the tools that come with it (and .NET) that make it perform badly.

  8. Re:Microsoft by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're one of those that appreciate quality, you go with Microsoft.

    Is this sarcasm?

    I mean you even mention the red ring of death producing machine right there.

  9. Re:Microsoft by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Informative

    and it's what everyone uses in lower division college courses

    Really? I see Eclipse all over the place. Maybe I have not look around enough though...

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  10. Re:Microsoft by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I like Windows and Visual Studio as well does that make me a shill too?

  11. Re:NY is a freakn corrupt cesspool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. We don't need anymore east coasters out here. It's bad enough already

  12. Re:Microsoft by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really? I had to use vi through a remote terminal. But I think my professor may have been a sadist.

  13. Re:Microsoft by MrEricSir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Depends. Are you posting comments praising it that are unrelated to the topic?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  14. Re:Microsoft by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    If you're one of those that appreciate quality, you go with Microsoft.

    Hmmm...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZSeries
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NonStop

    Yup, I see your point.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  15. Re:Microsoft by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Troll

    The first step to fixing a problem is admitting you have one.

  16. Re:Microsoft by bhcompy · · Score: 1

    It's what I've seen across numerous CSU and CCC campuses. Maybe it's a CA thing

  17. Re:Microsoft by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    I don't see what is particularly wrong with that, for an introductory class...

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  18. The mods must be smoking crack by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    Who modded that post "insightful?"

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  19. Shouldn't they have been doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the first place?

    I mean, the fact that Microsoft was forcing software bundles on the city seems very sneaky and underhanded. Usually when you're dealing with that big of a client, you're cutting them the deal, not the other way around.

    Also, as much as I love Windows, there is no reason that organizations looking to save money should not be using OpenOffice or one of its variants.

    1. Re:Shouldn't they have been doing this by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm old enough to remember when Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, Publisher, Project, Visio, and whatever else MS is bundling these days as "Office" were simply separate products, which anyone could buy individually. "Microsoft Office" was just a less expensive way to get a bunch of them together. They were put together to leverage the more popular apps in the package, to entice (and then lock) users into using the less successful ones. The idea was to cut into (for example) WordPerfect sales by giving people who were already going to buy Excel a discounted copy of Word to go along with it. Or if you wanted Word and Powerpoint, you could get Excel along with them for a lot less than buying a separate license for Lotus 1-2-3. It worked, obviously, and now it's totally impractical to pick and choose which apps you want. If you want WordPerfect for its markup capabilities and Excel for its charting options, you pretty much have to pay for a bunch of other software you don't want to go with them.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Shouldn't they have been doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing sneaky or underhanded about it. Microsoft calls it an Enterprise Agreement. Such an agreement involves the customer agreeing to purchase a broad set of products for everyone in the organization at a significantly discounted rate. Microsoft has not been in the business of forcing bundled packages of software on anyone since the DOJ consent decree. But they can still offer discounts for buying software in bulk. If you had actually read the article you would have realized that the summary was pretty far off base by stating that Microsoft had been forcing each seat to buy a suite of software.

    3. Re:Shouldn't they have been doing this by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm old enough to remember when Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, Publisher, Project, Visio, and whatever else MS is bundling these days as "Office" were simply separate products, which anyone could buy individually.

      You still can buy them separately. I was just looking at a pricelist earlier today that showed Word, Excel, Outlook and Access as individual items. If you wanted more than one product then you were much better off buying the cheapest Office package.

    4. Re:Shouldn't they have been doing this by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So? What exactly did/does Microsoft do to stop you buying fucking WordPerfect or Lotus 1-2-3 if you're that bothered? Nothing, they just made it not worth the effort, because those products were not that much better than Word or Excel.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Shouldn't they have been doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's anticompetitive bundling, which resulted in us not having those choices any more. Not that a moron who resorts to abusive language like this would understand such a concept.

  20. Re:gay penises are the best penises by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    CmdrTaco has a goatee (or goatsee, as he calls it)

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  21. And what does Microsoft get out of this? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Maybe free hot dogs from NY street vendors for their employees. This would definitely be a mission for these guys: http://improveverywhere.com/

    Armies of folks converge somewhere in NYC, wearing Microsoft T-Shirts, and demand their free hot dogs. And then disappear.

    Actually, the trick would probably work better if the folks had iPhone / IPad / iWhatever T-Shirts . . .

    An old NYC saying says, "A hot dog vendor, and his hot dog, are not easily parted . . . without a cash payment, or a bare knuckles fist fight."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:And what does Microsoft get out of this? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the city threatened to migrate some departments away from Microsoft -- like, for example, the computers that are used in the city's school system? I bet that would have gotten Microsoft to start begging.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:And what does Microsoft get out of this? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the city threatened to migrate some departments away from Microsoft -- like, for example, the computers that are used in the city's school system? I bet that would have gotten Microsoft to start begging.

      Too late. (Unless you're talking about the computers in the school offices? Yeah, we're all on Win XP / Office 2007.)

  22. Conveniently unbundles... and rebundled. by eepok · · Score: 1

    Wait... so they "unbundled" the Office Suite and recreated 3 new bundles costing on average $500 per person? That's the same price as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote, Access, and Publisher bundled together as Office Professional 2010 without a bulk institutional discount!

    What a deal!

    1. Re:Conveniently unbundles... and rebundled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If this includes developer tools, Exchange, AD, etc, then 500 per person average sounds about right.

    2. Re:Conveniently unbundles... and rebundled. by jesseck · · Score: 1

      Exchange is not Office- it's in Microsoft's server product category (different products in different categories for volume licensing). AD is also Servers (and is part of Windows Servers). Developer's tools- doubtful. You get macros w/ Office Professional.

  23. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's impressive that you typed that well thought out post (your first post, no less!) all in one minute after the story was made public, despite lack of a subscriber account.

    You do know that the subscriber asterisk can be turned off, right?

  24. Curiously absent... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    ... is an explanation of why apparently no city employee in any function whatsoever could so much as even consider using OpenOffice for anything at all.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Curiously absent... by js3 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The fact that when you open an MS word document and do any editing it fucks it up for everyone else is one reason. One of our meetings went like this

      "Who uses open office?"

      "silence"

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
  25. Poor New Yorkers! by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    They will slowly be strangled by those closed [proprietary] Microsoft Office formats.

    It's document editing and email...for now. What Microsoft will do is to wait for another administration then 'sweeten' the deal. Slowly, Powerpoint, Excel, and all the rest will come into the fold. Then...

    Guess what! They will be hooked to the extent that thinking of another alternative will be too expensive a proposition.

    Time will tell...but I am almost sure New Yorkers have not seen nothing yet.

    1. Re:Poor New Yorkers! by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This just happened again the other day. Older version of MS Word on an older machine. I know that updates can loaded and filters can be installed, what I do not understand is why file formats cannot be made somewhat backwards compatible by establishing a system of conditional statements. Of course such a feature would only encourage people not to pay for upgrades, which would be very bad.

      Anyway Openoffice solved the problem. There are features that open office does not have, like collaboration, is handled by Google Docs. I had no problem paying MS money until the day when reliability was called into question.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Poor New Yorkers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that updates can loaded and filters can be installed, what I do not understand is why file formats cannot be made somewhat backwards compatible by establishing a system of conditional statements.

      ...
      How would that work? Seriously, take an open standard like HTML 4.01, try and display a HTML4.01 page in Netscape 3 or MSIE 3, it will look like crap even though all the content loaded (hint: those versions don't support CSS and every website uses CSS now)

      If you're referring to DOCX vs DOC. DOC is an MS COM/OLE based file format, it is a hideous Windows specific disaster (literally, OLE is a Windows feature not Office though Office for Mac needs to emulate it with limited success). DOCX on the other hand is a bunch of XML files in a ZIP (Like OpenOffice's ODF but without the openness). The new terrible XML format can't be made backward compatible with the old terrible binary format as they are completely orthogonal (though it is arguable whether OOXML is really much of an improvement).

  26. Amazing. by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Over the years I have seen many pro-MS posters accused of being shills for MS.

    I think this is the first time I actually agree with the others that you are indeed a shill.

    _

  27. Finally. by Cornwallis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess now I can convince MS to sell me their uninstall utility. That's all I want to use.

  28. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out the last three digits of the ID number on the GP's new account. I think his affiliations are pretty clear.

  29. Re:Everything else than Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    TL;DR

    Writing long crap and repeating it all over doesn't make it more right.

    For your information, in my university, almost everyone uses a Mac - students and teachers. Most of them dual boot or virtualize fedora or ubuntu. I can count with my fingers the number of people running windows. Another interesting fact is that the worst students are the ones running *only* Microsoft Windows.

    Oh, and by the way - I run another special flavor of Linux which probably doesn't mean anything to you.

  30. Re:Microsoft by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft is the topic.

  31. $50Million buys a lot of Development by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I am constantly surprised when I see figures like this. I love OpenOffice/LibreOffice its incredible and Microsoft Office is simply not worth the money to me. I cannot think how many Developers NewYork could add to its workforce with its own Bespoke Extensions that it cannot be worth the money. I keep seeing all these large migrations from Office. When will there be a move with real Developer power behind it.

    1. Re:$50Million buys a lot of Development by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing all these large migrations from Office?

      You do? ::whiplash-look-around-wildly:: Where?!

  32. Re:Microsoft by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The use of an IDE in a college is decided first and foremost by which language/platform they use to teach, and that typically depends on the local IT job market - there are places where Java is on top, and there are places where .NET is on top, even within the same country (like US).

  33. Does this mean they have to do this for the feds? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GAO contracts usually have a "most favored customer" clause, meaning that any better offer to another customer is automatically offered to the federal government. I wonder that such terms apply in this case.

  34. Re:Microsoft by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No. Microsoft giving customers a reasonably well packaged offering is the news item.

    If you want to praise someone for this you ought to praise the existence of macs, linux, openoffice.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  35. Re:NY is a freakn corrupt cesspool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The west coast is any better? Fuck. I live in San Diego and this is the biggest piece of news I've heard in months...

  36. Re:Does this mean they have to do this for the fed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes

  37. so heres what i think is going on by nimbius · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is a corporation, a technology corporation but a corporation nevertheless. The mentality behind this move is very clear: whatever it takes for the dog to bite. If they scoffed and tried to force the entire suite of products at full price on a cash-strapped city on the heels of an election they would get no business whatsoever, and some PHB who finally listened to the greyhair running the servers would find out exactly how good microsofts competition is. business operating is a recession is still business, it just becomes slightly less encumbered.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  38. Re:Microsoft by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

    And after 20 years, there still
    isn't anything that comes even close to Visual Studio as a development environment.

    *cough* *cough* And after 34 years, there still isn't anything that comes even close to Vi.

    There! Fixed that for you.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  39. Not enough to have "Microserfs" anymore... by avatar139 · · Score: 1

    Now they're trying to foist the idea of a caste system on the rest of the poor sods out there stuck using Windows (not just the ones working at Microsoft) because of idiotic decisions on workplace IT policies made by people who don't end up having to support and implement what ends up being purchased. Or those IT heads incompetent enough to still keep continuing to promote using any Microsoft software.

    I've maintained for several years now that the above point is the main reason that Windows, Office and Server are pretty much the only thing keeping Microsoft solvent, as those three divisions' continuing success mainly hinges on the applied wisdom of decision making by the heads of educational, corporate and government institutions regarding technical matters (or rather the complete lack thereof) rather than Microsoft making any discernable effort regarding the quality of the products and services they provide...

    --
    I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    1. Re:Not enough to have "Microserfs" anymore... by clodney · · Score: 1

      I've maintained for several years now that the above point is the main reason that Windows, Office and Server are pretty much the only thing keeping Microsoft solvent, as those three divisions' continuing success mainly hinges on the applied wisdom of decision making by the heads of educational, corporate and government institutions regarding technical matters (or rather the complete lack thereof) rather than Microsoft making any discernable effort regarding the quality of the products and services they provide...

      Those 3 divisions the only things keeping MS solvent? From what I can tell by looking at earnings reports, those 3 divisions are about 90% of the company. I think most companies would be happy that 90% of the business lines are solidly profitable.

    2. Re:Not enough to have "Microserfs" anymore... by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      Office and Server are pretty much the only thing keeping Microsoft solvent, as those three divisions' continuing success mainly hinges on the applied wisdom of decision making by the heads of educational, corporate and government institutions regarding technical matters (or rather the complete lack thereof)

      Their entertainment division (mainly because of the Xbox, although other things (like Zune) get run out of there) is profitable and doesn't rely in institutional purchasers at all.

    3. Re:Not enough to have "Microserfs" anymore... by avatar139 · · Score: 1

      Their entertainment division (mainly because of the Xbox, although other things (like Zune) get run out of there) is profitable and doesn't rely in institutional purchasers at all.

      You caught me, you're right. Rather you're half-right.

      I forgot they merged the entertainment with the devices in 2005 to help bury the fact that the XBox 360 still takes a loss on every console sold, although how much is a matter of some debate in the industry.

      So while the mobile devices side of the entertainment division fence makes money, the 360 and the Zune are basically write-offs.

      --
      I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    4. Re:Not enough to have "Microserfs" anymore... by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      EVERY console takes a loss per console sold. The Xbox 360 division is profitable because of selling licensing rights to games and its online service that gamers are willing to pay $60.00 a year for.
      The merging of entertainment and "mobile devices" was to make mobile devices more profitable, not the Xbox. What mobile devices makes Microsoft money? The Kin?

  40. Nah its not us by voss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish Linux and openoffice had been the motivator. Google Apps and gmail
    is to be given credit for this one. Microsoft is scared s--tless of google apps because
    its catching on in the enterprise where Microsoft's bread and butter is. If
    lower tier workers can use google and google apps for 90% of their work then their bosses
    will figure out how to shift the other 10% on to others. It also deprives them of revenue
    from Outlook when google hosts email on their servers.

    1. Re:Nah its not us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      why do politicians insist on buying the $400 toilet seats? oh thats right they get their pockets lined with politico bucks from the businesses they buy from

      (in case there are a few dense politicos and other liberals that don't understand the simile --- Micro$hit is the electronic toilet seat makers of the 21st century)

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. Re:Microsoft by Hylandr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, at least he's right about Visual Studio(as far as Windows is concerned). The fact that the Express version is free AND comes with a free implementation of MSSQL only cements it in because it is the entry point, it's free, and it's what everyone uses in lower division college courses. No better way to lock in your market

    This is why they made Marijuana Illegal.

    - Dan.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  43. Re:Apologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it's spelled "thought", retard.

    not that i'd expect you to have one...

  44. Re:Does this mean they have to do this for the fed by Pherlin · · Score: 1

    It would... but that would also depend on Microsoft being a Direct GAO Vendor.

    Not saying that they aren't... but my gut tells me that some distributor(s) that is(are) able to resell volume licences is more likely the one on a GAO Contract.

  45. Welcome to Slashdot by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

    #1 tech news site and it doesn't have a Microsoft section

    Please bury this comment I think it might be borderline heresy.

    1. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Possibly because MS belongs more in the "religion" section ? You know, where people talk to inanimate objects in the hope that it will get something done for them ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    2. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Possibly because MS belongs more in the "religion" section ? You know, where people talk to inanimate objects in the hope that it will get something done for them ?
      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.

      And THAT'S why I don't disable sigs!

    3. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by bell.colin · · Score: 1

      Apple is taking up all the room.

    4. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      Do you ever take a day off from M$ hating or is it kind of a full time burden?

    5. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't worry your pretty ass, it's not a burden. It's more like second nature, really - has been ever since I've been forced to work with the utter crud they shit out.

      Some of it is actually reasonably good, these days - I was surprised how smooth Win7 runs even on a 256M VM. Other stuff keeps being utterly disgusting - I'm looking at you, sharepoint - and will keep being bashed on, although the main reason I so detest the company is the way they conduct business.

      None of this is relevant to you, however, as a single glance has sufficed for you to clearly and fully grasp what kind of an evil, mentally incapacitated "M$" hater that I am. The dollar sign isn't cool, incidentally, nor even remotely witty.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  46. Why is NYC using Microsoft Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Mr. Efficient City Bloomberg using Microsoft Office at all?
    Using OpenOffice throughout NYC would save tens of dollars per employee if not hundreds of dollars per employee.

  47. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so true

  48. Re:Microsoft by somersault · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It doesn't matter. It's a brand new account, and that is his only post, ever. I really doubt that account has a subscription. Chances of it all being a coincidence seem rather low to me.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  49. Re:Microsoft by somersault · · Score: 1

    I like Visual Studio too, what difference does it make. This guy is going far beyond "I like Visual Studio", it reads like a psychopath trying to get someone to sleep with him. That account is brand new, has only one post, and he would have to be a very organised thinker as well as a rather hyperactive typer to get all of that out in a maximum of two minutes after the story appeared. It all seemed a bit too orchestrated to me.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  50. Re:Microsoft by somersault · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, we used both for different courses at my Uni.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  51. What exactly is new here? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For sufficiently large customers or groups of customers, it has always been possible to get special offers from Microsoft. I think the city of New York qualifies for this category.

    For comparison:
    In the early 90s, Microsoft created the XP Corporate edition that does not need activation, to appease large customers who were worried about losing the ability to install their copies of XP.
    Later, Microsoft shared source code with some universities and government agencies to counter the advantage of Open Source in being more accessible for security audits.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:What exactly is new here? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      And by "special offer" you mean "not being forced to buy what you don't need"?

    2. Re:What exactly is new here? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      In the case of NYC, obviously yes.

      But Microsoft seems to be really flexible on those Very Important Customer deals. The examples I used are about
      -no DRM (I think product activation is a form of DRM)
      -giving access to the otherwise carefully guarded sources.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    3. Re:What exactly is new here? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      In the early 90s, Microsoft created the XP Corporate edition that does not need activation, to appease large customers who were worried about losing the ability to install their copies of XP.

      Uhhhhhhhh XP was released in 2001..... I think you need to recheck your dates.

  52. Re:Microsoft by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Hopefully a lot. That makes his comment being modded -1 Troll all the more funny.

    Good job calling him out on it :)

  53. Re:Microsoft by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm.. Jdeveloper (from Oracle) is free as is Eclipse and NetBeans, and not just the crippled versions. The super-duper versions are free, too. Oracle XE is free as well, along with MySQL and PostgreSQL. There are other alternatives to Microsoft when it comes to free software. Most of the others don't have strings attached, too.

    Disclamer: I do not work for Oracle. I wasn't paid by anybody to say this. Hell, I wish I was - I could use the extra cash.

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  54. Re:Everything else than Microsoft by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    For your information, in my university, almost everyone uses a Mac - students and teachers. Most of them dual boot or virtualize fedora or ubuntu.

    For your information, in my current workplace (and in every other previous workplace) everyone uses Windows and the words "dual boot" and "virtualize" would mean precisely nothing to them.

    I assume you are some sort of computer science student? You are not a typical user, and a university is not the real world.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  55. Re:Microsoft by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    It would be great to see Open Source versions for such online tools, but there are none

    Awful sure of yourself there, buddy. What tools have no OS counterparts?

    I made the decision to upgrade all computers with Windows 7

    Why would a business do that? There's little if any added functionality over XP. Yes, 7 is nicer, but there's no way it could increase productivity. What kind of businessman would waste cash like that? Especially in an economy like this? I suggest you start job hunting, because with that kind of wastefulness your company will be in Chapter 13 before Balmer can throw a chair.

    one-of-a-kind Office tools

    Such as?

    ...and Bing...

    Ha ha aha HA HA HA! STOPPIT!!! YER KILLIN' ME!!! ha ha HA HA HA Bing! Man, you ought to be on Comedy Central! Now, another suggestion -- take your meds, son.

  56. Re:Everything else than Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "virtualize" would mean precisely nothing to them.

    Then your are working with a bunch of dumb people. Apple made so simple software virtualization in their OS that everyone can install crap there without realizing what they are doing.

    I assume you are some sort of computer science student? You are not a typical user, and a university is not the real world.

    Yes I am. University is not real world? What is it then? Imagination from my head?

    Seriously though, I was just telling that in my department people is quickly moving to OSX. Did you really need to come with all of that weaponry?

    Oh and by the way.. It's not only in my department, girls in Chemistry and Biology also found out they look sexy with Macbooks.

  57. a broader set of applications by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    "New York City has put the squeeze on Microsoft, negotiating a bulk software purchase that should lower technology costs for the city and give government workers access to more modern applications .. But Microsoft’s agreement with New York covers a broader set of applications beyond office software that Google has yet to match" link

    What `broader set of applications' does MS offer that NYC needs to do its work?

  58. Not astroturfer, but troll by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    He's not an astroturfer, he's a troll.

    First of all look at the misnamed product:

    Windows Mobile 7,

    It's Windows Phone 7 (and a big step backwards from any WinMo products, but that's beside the point)

    Next, he disses "cloud computing:"

    storing company data "in the cloud" is not a good idea.

    Not what a company selling cloud computing products (such as a "cloud" email server off the top of my head, IIRC they also have a Google Apps clone) would do.

    And finally, he winks at anyone who knows how to recognize a troll post:

    made me horny over a computer equipment.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  59. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? I had to use vi through a remote terminal. But I think my professor may have been a sadist.

    Your professor was doing you a favour. Whether you realized it at the time is another matter. During a previous contract I had one coworker actually make the comment, "Oh, you work at the UNIX command prompt." Yeah, I was integrating a *nix-based service running on Sun Solaris; what did my coworker expect me to do? Write the code using Microsoft Notepad and transfer the file to the *nix server?

  60. Re:Apologies by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    The same thing happened to me a few years ago. I'd been away from slashdot for a few years, changed ISPs and forgotten my /. password, so I re-registered with "sm62702" (later emailed /. help and got my old uid back). Someone registered under sm627O2 (replacing zero with capital O) and even went so far as to try and write journals like me (good luck with that).

    Imitation is the creepiest form of flattery!

  61. Re:Microsoft by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

    Really? I had to use vi through a remote terminal. But I think my professor may have been a sadist.

    You say it likes it a bad thing, that's how I work everyday.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  62. Re:Microsoft by BassMan449 · · Score: 1

    I disagree. Visual Studio with ViEmu blows them both away. Truly the best of both worlds.

  63. Re:Microsoft by digitig · · Score: 1

    Really? I had to put a deck of punched cards in a box and wait for a printout to come back a few hours later.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  64. Re:Microsoft by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    I like Windows and Visual Studio as well does that make me a shill too?

    Yes. At least, according to some - I can't find it now, but I recall a thread with one person who basically insisted that if you're speaking favorably of "M$", you are a shill. By itself this is not unexpected - there are zealots everywhere - but a disturbingly large number of people spoke up to agree with him (in addition to the +5 insightful mod).

  65. Re:Microsoft by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    That is bad news for Google, which has been heavily investing in developing online versions of similar applications that Microsoft offers.

    I think you got something mixed up - perhaps you meant to say "Microsoft, which has been heavily investing in catching up to the online product offering of Google"?

  66. Re:Microsoft by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Really? I had to plug wires into panels and pull dead flies out of the works.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  67. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Microsoft quality is very important. They spend a lot of money and there best developers on getting the quality exactly how they want it: make the quality and the user experience of the reduced packages so bad that everyone will just have to get the full package. If the reduced packages are bad enough, then no one will dare switching back to it, so there will be no need to improve the quality of the full package. The easyest way to do this is making small but critical details incompatible with the full version.