Slashdot Mirror


Beware the Garden of Steven

theodp writes "With its forthcoming Lion Mac OS and new Apple-curated Mac Apps Store, Apple will be locking down top tier applications on the Mac similar to the way apps are locked down on the iPad and iPhone. Only by submitting their apps to Apple's store and giving up 30% of their receipts will developers get to take advantage of two new OS features. The first is Apple's new 'Launchpad,' a tool for easily opening application; the second is the ability to update apps to new versions with one click. It will be a lot easier to use apps bought from the Mac App Store than ones downloaded in the wild. It didn't have to be that way, says Valleywag's Ryan Tate: 'Apple could have enabled its Launchpad and auto-update features for all applications, sold through the Apple Store or not. For example, an open system for updating applications has been in use for years on Ubuntu... Ubuntu's 'Apt' (Advanced Packaging Tool) lets users install, update, and remove software of their choosing with a single command. There's a central list of apps curated by Ubuntu's maintainers, but users are free to add and install from other lists... But Apple seems to have made a very clear choice not to take the open route.' Longtime Apple developer Dave Winer was also concerned, tweeting during Apple's presentation 'Is this the end of the Mac as an open platform?' The news also prompted developer Anil Dash to call for an open alternative to the Mac App Store."

37 of 580 comments (clear)

  1. FUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we seriously cool it with the 'OMG Lockdown!' claims? Yes, Apple introduced an app store for macs this week, but at the moment there are plenty of other ways to get applications, and use of said app store is certainly not required. When the lockdown is actually in place, then we can complain and move on from OS X to [insert your favorite Linux flavor here]. Let's stop rolling down this slippery slope already.

    1. Re:FUD! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This just in, Only by using Apple's central repository can you launch and update your apps through Apple's central repository... Err? Duh?

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    2. Re:FUD! by tysonedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple showed non-app-store Applications within their Launchpad. However, yes... Apple is saying that for them to distribute Updates on your behalf without you paying for your bandwidth or order processing, than you need to provide them with their 30% figure. Yes, they have bad terms outlined in their Acceptance Agreements. Yes, it is certainly going to be anti-competitive. Yes, it is going to promote more "dumb" apps like we have on the iPhone. Yes, we acknowledge that many of the "useful" apps would be outright rejected from the App Store... The take-away is that for Developers where the new model isn't a good fit, just keep doing precisely what you are doing today.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    3. Re:FUD! by Kalidor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, yeah .. Winsus can be extended for third party apps. And it's trivial to point your Windows update at a different update server. That said, only corporate entities and bored hyper-boxers really do that kinda stuff...

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    4. Re:FUD! by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Look at the apps shown in Launchpad in the demo. Notice Mail, iChat, iCal, Time Machine, Dictionary, DVD Player, Automator, the entire Microsoft Office Suite, etc. I can't imagine that any of those are in there because they were downloaded from the App Store....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:FUD! by Yer+Mum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm betting on mandatory code signing for applications outside the Mac App Store, making freeware impossible and shareware only available if the App Store censor allows it by 10.9. All for the customers' own good, you understand (viruses, uncertainty of downloading off the internet, and stuff).

      At that point the web browser starts to become less important as newspapers can be accessed by (paid-for) apps.

    6. Re:FUD! by Amarantine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but I can readily admit that most Mac users are Yahoo Answers-grade stupid when it comes to computers.

      What, and Windows users aren't? I agree that most Mac users aren't exactly the brightest computer users, but get real, most Windows users don't even know other OS's exist, let alone what an OS is. Mindless flock of sheep, really.

    7. Re:FUD! by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay just some random conjecture:

      Imagine you've got a program called "Opera Browser" and you are Not distributed through the app store. That means you won't be able to use the LaunchPad and 1-Click Updates. Wouldn't that tend to make your program less attractive than, say, Apple Safari which DOES have those abilities?

      Just thinking out loud.
      Please don't damage my karma.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:FUD! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't need to make it difficult to install applications outside of the Mac App Store. They just need to re-educate users so that most users will refuse to install applications not from the Mac App Store.

    9. Re:FUD! by BoberFett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seem to remember quite the outrage at a certain company whose founder is sometimes compared to a Borg for doing something similar...

    10. Re:FUD! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      What, and Windows users aren't?

      They just don't pay as much to be stupid.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:FUD! by gmack · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can work around the Linux repos on Redhat,SuSE, Debian and Ubuntu by just adding your own repo to the list and whatever software you want can still be centrally updated. It's something I've seen several software installers do.

    12. Re:FUD! by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it classifies all Apps in your Applications folder (or should we call it Apps folder now) as well as those you downloaded through the Mac App Store.

      The rest of the API's (full screen, instant shutdown/save etc...) are completely open and available and quite transparent to existing apps (no need to recode/recompile existing applications)

      It's basically that they merged Expose, Dashboard and Spaces and made it more the look-and-feel of iOS and added a Store for free and non-free apps. Especially for individual developers this will give more exposure to some really good applications that are now pretty hard to find. Hosting, update distribution and promotion/ranking for only 30% of your revenue is pretty darn good unless you're Adobe or Microsoft or other software makers that can charge thousands of dollars for 4 or 5 crappy apps.

      Hopefully they will also integrate an Enterprise option similar to the iPhone so you can create or package, distribute and automatically update your own set of applications. Currently you still have to rely on third party systems or Apple Remote Desktop for this.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    13. Re:FUD! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 5, Funny

      (which I'm sure happens with Linux repos too. I can't imagine they accept any piece of trash "hello world" app just because it was submitted.)

      $ aptitude show hello
      Package: hello
      State: not installed
      Version: 2.4-3 [wtf?]
      [blah blah blah]
      Description: The classic greeting, and a good example
        The GNU hello program produces a familiar, friendly greeting. It allows
        non-programmers to use a classic computer science tool which would otherwise be
        unavailable to them.

        Seriously, though: this is an example of how to do a Debian package. It is the
        Debian version of the GNU Project's `hello world' program (which is itself an
        example for the GNU Project).

      --
      $ make available
    14. Re:FUD! by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If so, they're going to need to fork a Mac OS X Scientist Edition and attend to all the confusion that would entail. I know a lot of good professors and post-docs who use Mac as a "friendly unix", and recommend it to their students for that reason. Apple has actively courted this market, and it'd be outright stupid to risk it now. Not that I'd be shocked, but I'd be fairly surprised and it'd be a really dumb move.

      I don't particularly like what they're doing now, since it makes installing free software (like R) from a disk image a "mysterious" thing instead of a commonplace thing, which makes using it in introductory classes more of a burden. Nonetheless it's tolerable. I really hope they don't extrapolate as you're suggesting; as a linux user it's currently slightly easier for me to collaborate with Mac users than Windows users.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    15. Re:FUD! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, yeah .. Winsus can be extended for third party apps

      I'm genuinely curious now. I've never seen a non-MS application get any updates via Windows Update. Can you give some examples? Better yet, link to e.g. MSDN article/reference on how to add support for that to one's own app?

  2. The battle is ON! by TimHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    The battle between the kdawson haters and the Apple haters starts NOW!

  3. Not yet but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although clearly Apple has not yet closed down OS X - you would still be able to download and install apps from elsewhere I can't help but think this is just the stepping stone to eventual lock down of OSX. The Flash and Java exclusion timings are not mere coincidences. That would be a sad day indeed after Apple took so much from Open Source and used it to build the most closed down system you can imagine. It almost sounds like Apple is asking "Just how much can I get away with?". They will gauge the response, make sure they have enough developer backing to ride on and then one day close it all up. I am sure they will get enough people to both develop and buy apps and that's really going to be the driver to the lock down.

    1. Re:Not yet but.. by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's more like Apple asking, "Hey we've come up with all this new interface stuff that people have really loved, how can we take some of what we've learned and use it to make our other products more similar?"

      The Mac is finally starting to make some inroads on Windows market share, Apple makes the vast majority of their revenue off of selling hardware, and they're selling record numbers of their computers, all with profit margins that any other computer manufacturer would kill for. Why would they be so eager to even risk stomping on all of that momentum in exchange for a 30% cut of a bunch of 99 cent apps?

      It would destroy the platform that developers use to make apps for iOS, it would alienate all of the big software companies that make mac software, and it would turn the technical community entirely against them. I don't think they're that stupid.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  4. "Ubuntu's Apt"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For example, an open system for updating applications has been in use for years on Ubuntu... Ubuntu's 'Apt' (Advanced Packaging Tool) lets users install, update, and remove software of their choosing with a single command. There's a central list of apps curated by Ubuntu's maintainers, but users are free to add and install from other lists.

    Man, this "apt" business sounds amazing. Wouldn't it be great if Debian had something like this? Ubuntu should definitely contribute this "apt" upstream.

  5. Launchpad not limited to App Store by snowwrestler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have not seen any evidence that the Launchpad is limited ONLY to apps from the Mac App Store. What the Apple site says is that apps from the store are automatically added to Launchpad. That's not the same thing as saying "only" store apps are added to Launchpad. In fact what it says is "Your open windows fade away, replaced by an elegant, full-screen display of all the apps on your Mac." All the apps. (If there's a statement I'm not aware, please post a link...)

    Including the apps in the update tool might be useful, but most apps on my Mac check for updates themselves when I start them. It's not like I have to remember to go out and check the Firefox or Adobe sites for patches myself.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  6. Funny stuff, Mr. Jobs by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Longtime Apple developer Dave Winer was also concerned, tweeting during Apple's presentation 'Is this the end of the Mac as an open platform?'

    If Apple is restricting operating system features to whitelisted applications, then it is, by definition, no longer an open platform. There are degrees of openness, of course, but given Apple's approach to the iPhone, my guess is that the Mac will eventually become a similar prison.

    The news also prompted developer Anil Dash to call for an open alternative to the Mac App Store."

    Rather, pick an open alternative to Apple. It's truly remarkable that Steve Jobs is finally starting to make Microsoft look good. And this comes at a time when Windows is, actually, looking halfway decent and MacOS is starting to look a little dated. If Ballmer has half a brain he'll exploit this to the max.

    I guess Apple is expecting the same mindset that made the iPod and iPhone so phenomenally successful to carry over into the personal computer world. Time will tell, but truthfully I don't think much of the bulk of Macintosh users' hold on reality, so chances are, Jobs is going to be right once again. Enough people will stand for this that it will make a metric fuckton of money. That depresses me, somehow.

    The amazing thing to me, speaking as someone who was in the ground floor of the personal computer revolution, and still has an Apple ][ Standard with the Integer ROM sitting on a shelf somewhere, is that it is Apple Computer that is pulling this crap on its users. It's the kind of thing that one would more reasonably have expected from the likes of the old IBM, or even MIcrosoft. But no, it comes from the company that once stood for freedom in computing.

    No thanks. You've fallen a looong way, Mr. Jobs. What little respect I once had for you just jumped out the window.

    In a world of does, Mac doesn't. How's that for a marketing tagline?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Funny stuff, Mr. Jobs by jo_ham · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article is enormous FUD of the highest order.

      There is absolutely no evidence that LaunchPad is restricted to App Store apps only - in fact, the inference from Apple's literature is quite the opposite. However, no one can actually confirm one way or the other.

      Drawing conclusions on this evidence is... questionable.

      Also, it should surprise no one that autoupdating from an Apple-hosted repository would perhaps be a service that costs money to run (thus, if you want in [as a developer], you need to pay for it).

  7. Re:Apt is from Debian. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lets not let the tail wag the dog. APT was created on and used initially with Debian.

    The distro that makes a no-frills version of Ubuntu? Props to them for sending it upstream.

  8. Did author read any details of the App store? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My understanding that an Apple announced an additional distribution channel using the Mac App store. Apple was not replacing the existing methods of retail, online, etc. Also Apple is not introducing any DRM to prevent installation. He also doesn't understand existing distribution systems today.

    Apple could have enabled its Launchpad and auto-update features for all applications, sold through the Apple Store or not. For example, an open system for updating applications has been in use for years on Ubuntu, a Linux based operating system. Ubuntu's "Apt" (Advanced Packaging Tool) lets users install, update and remove software of their choosing with a single command.

    So the author expects that somehow that apps not submitted to Apple will appear magically appear for auto-update? In the case of Ubuntu, there is a system to do handle updates. However, any code installed outside of the system (i.e. tarball or gzip) does not get auto-updated within the system.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Did author read any details of the App store? by aukset · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you might have missed or are ignoring is that apt allows you to specify the location of ANY and MULTIPLE repositories, so its possible for an individual developer to host their own repository for their own stuff that users can acquire and update their software from, without having to touch the official central repositories.

      --
      No sig now
  9. Re:Flash and Java not excluded from OS X by metamatic · · Score: 5, Informative

    You apparently missed the fact that you also can't include Flash and Java apps in the Mac App Store. If 90% of Mac users get all their apps from the App Store, then that will quickly kill off Flash and Java on the Mac, even before Apple starts locking down the OS.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  10. Oh, bullshit. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only by submitting their apps to Apple's store and giving up 30% of their receipts will developers get to take advantage of two new OS features.

    The first is Apple's new 'Launchpad,' a tool for easily opening application

    Where exactly does it say that no apps except those bought from the App Store will be available in the Launchpad? Doesn't say that on Apple's page, and the way it's written doesn't even imply it, unless you're out looking for something to post an anti-Apple screed.

    the second is the ability to update apps to new versions with one click.

    Yeah, because no Mac applications currently have that ability. Oh, unless you count the ~750 listed here, that use Sparkle.

    ~Philly

  11. fud FUD fud FUD fud FUD fud FUD by onkelonkel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anybody remember when FUD used to mean Fear Uncertainty and Doubt. Now it just means "not true". Back in the day something could be FUD and still be 100% true.

    I know, I know, word meanings change, languages devolve over time....blah de blah. Still, I miss the days when English was a tool of subtlety and precision.

    signed - Wistful Grammar Nazi.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  12. This. by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The chicken-little fear of OSX becoming "closed" ignores the reality: Macs have barely 10% marketshare, Cross-platform development is common and well understood these days, and if power users (who act as system evangelists) start abandoning OSX, Apple stands to lose LOTS of money.

    The moment it becomes even difficult to do my daily job on a Mac is the day I go to Linux permanently... it's quite easy and usable today, but the Mac is more usable and affords me (with VMWare) the best OS for development for now.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  13. Re:Open Alternative to the Mac App Store by maztuhblastah · · Score: 4, Informative

    The funny thing is if such a thing already existed Apple would have promoted it.

    Yes, just like they promoted VirtueDesktops instead of rolling their own virtual desktop solution.

    Just like they promoted Watson instead of releasing Sherlock 3.

    Just like they promoted Audion instead of purchasing a competitor (SoundJam) and releasing it for free.

    Just like they promoted the best app from the range of existing iOS e-book software instead of releasing their own.

    Just like they promoted Konfabulator instead of releasing their own widget system.

    No, make no mistake about it -- if Apple wants control of a product space, they *will* make sure they get it, whether that means acquiring, ripping off, or otherwise replacing the existing solutions, they will find a way to do it.

  14. Don't Worry! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Windows will follow suit in just one version!

    The Zune store - which SLAVISHLY copies the entire iTunes / App store business and technology model - will be extendaed past Win Phone 7, right down to the desktop.

    Pray that Intel gets here first. Then at least, you will have a federated ecosystem of public, corporate and commercial app stores, with flexible policy boundaries.

    Otherwise, you are 4 years away from Palladium. Your PC is just like XBox 360!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Don't Worry! by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They target two different parts of the market.

      For one, unlike in game consoles, Microsoft is not a core hardware provider in the PC space. They only sell peripherals and software. They go after the commodity OS market.

      Apple is a hardware and software vendor. They don't want the commodity OS market on commodity hardware, and have fought hard not to allow OS X to be used on commodity hardware. They have a limited breadth, deep stack market with high margins. That's the way they like it. Setting up a central software market for the Mac lets them bring the type of control of experience they've leveraged on the iPhone, iPod, iPod Touch, and iPad to the Mac. It also allows them to expose their core software market to many smaller vendors in one place, and for Apple itself to have some level of quality control over third-party software.

      For Microsoft, letting everyone develop and distribute lets them hold on to the widespread use they worked so hard (legally and illegally) to get. For Apple, having control over the quality of third-party apps and offering third-party vendors things like Apple DRM, Apple-sponsored marketing, Apple-paid distribution, and Apple endorsements in exchange for a payment of tribute lets them consolidate control over their most powerful differentiator: nearly identical user experience across applications.

      Honestly, I think if Apple mishandles this it'll be disastrous for the Mac. If they execute the plan well, though, it could be a huge strength for them. It's a high-stakes, moderate risk play with huge payoff potential.

      What's more, the centralized application repository is popular and familiar among Linux users. We're quite used to making the decision between a fully vendor-supported repository, a third-party repository, and stuff we install ourselves and must update ourselves. Since OS X is a high-end desktop Unix with its own custom user interface (with the option of X), using long-time Linux and BSD software distribution methods makes sense to me. Let's just hope they execute it well and fairly.

    2. Re:Don't Worry! by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft wants people to develop for their operating system. It's the precise reason why they offer Visual Studio Express editions for free. It's this precise difference in thinking that gave Microsoft the larger market share over Apple, and Microsoft knows it all too well.

      Difference? ALL Apple development tools are free downloads. Not just a cut-down version; the complete development suite with everything in it; same as every other developer uses. You can develop and distribute/sell Mac apps with Apple's tools without giving Apple a cent, and that isn't changing.

  15. Not for individuals or small businesses by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Ubuntu and Debian, you are not limited to using the central repository with apt. You can add any third-party repositories to the list.

    You can do the same with iOS devices.

    Only if you represent a business with 500 or more employees, according to the page you linked.

  16. Re:Mac... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    was never open.

    I have no idea how an AC was modded +4 Insightful for that tripe. I can sudo in any terminal to gain root access if my account is an administrator. To gain similar access on windows 7, you have to reboot into a special mode otherwise you cannot alter/replace certain system files. All settings on the machine are in accessible plist file. All graphics can be replaced with modded version. Doing similar changes in windows requires accessing a proprietary binary hive database (registry), hacking resources in dll files and then rebooting into the recovery mode to replace the dlls with your hacked version.

    The core of OS X is open source. Where is the source for windows? Where can I download it?

    Apple released the technology they used to build their pro apps as Core Animation and Core video so I have to ask you, where are the apis MSFT uses for their software for third party devs to use? Why don't they update and use the common controls library for their Office and VS.NET products instead of custom built dialogs?

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  17. Good Lord, people, get hold of yourselves... by RedBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good Lord, people, get hold of yourselves...

    Only one problem with this complete nonsense about the platform becoming "locked down" with the creation of the Mac App Store. It's a complete load of crap. The "Mac" and Mac OS X is and will continue to be a general purpose computer system, where you will _always_ be able to install software from any site on the web or install from any boxed CD or DVD or USB stick. The Mac App Store is a brilliant piece of marketing strategy that the Mac users will absolutely adore from day one. When it is in place Apple will have finally succeeded in getting the general public to use something that the Unix/Linux world has been madly barking about for decades: a nearly system-wide package management system. Only Apple will have managed to create a package management system that commercial entities will actually "buy into", so to speak, which has been the major flaw in the package management systems in the Unix/Linux world for so very long. Once again, without even breaking a sweat, Apple is about to something we wish we'd been able to do for the last couple of decades.

    Mac OS X has had a sort of package management system (which works very well, BTW) for system updates for... well pretty much forever. Since its inception, I believe. But now, with a Mac App Store, users will have a single source to browse for and download both free and commercial software, have it _automatically_ install itself in the proper location with a single click*, and then keep dozens upon dozens of large and small apps completely up to date with a system-wide single-click update mechanism. Users will know that software from the Mac App Store has been vetted as being safe, having a certain quality level and not being completely pointless. Currently, most Mac applications are pretty smart about telling you there is an update available, and many of them will do a single-click download and update without much fuss. But this normally only happens when you run the app. Unfortunately, when you're starting an app it's usually because you want to use it, so it's kind of a pain to be constantly having one individual app after another telling you there is an update available. With the Mac App Store the users will have a central place to look for and receive notices of application updates, and a single button that will download and apply all relevant updates.

    The moment the Mac App Store was revealed I immediately saw that it would change the way the typical Mac user will manage software on their computer, and everyone else will once again be stuck trying to cobble something together and catch up. Microsoft will desperately attempt to have something similar in place in the next version of Windows. Of course they will fail horribly, as usual. What will happen is that the Mac platform will continue to accelerate and gain more and more users on into the foreseeable future, because Apple is completely boxing in all market demographics. Between the iPhone, the iPad and now a new mind-bogglingly simple to use Mac platform, the PC world is going to be in serious trouble. Mark my words. Remember, the paying market could not care less about the kinds of "openness" we're always worrying about here on /. They want stuff that's as easy to use as their TV, and Apple is the only one giving them what they want.

    Trust me folks, this is going to be _big_. The few developers who complain that the Mac App Store is too tightly controlled and refuse to use it will unfortunately be completely drowned out by the thundering horde who will be rushing to use it and showering praise on it for the next decade. Those of us "in the know" will continue to download apps from the general internet and use our general purpose computers as general purpose computers. That simply won't change. If it does change somewhere down the line, there's always Linux. Ten years from now I'm sure Linux will be kicking some major ass and still be just as open as ever. And even if the Mac platform keeps growing phenomenally the way it h