Slashdot Mirror


How Hulu, NBC, and Other Sites Block Google TV

Shortly after the launch of Google TV, it became clear that several networks and services were blocking access. Reader padarjohn points out a blog post from Lauren Weinstein explaining the blocking mechanisms being used and wondering why it's being tolerated. "Imagine the protests that would ensue if Internet services arbitrarily blocked video only to Internet Explorer or Firefox browsers! Or if Hulu and the other networks decided they'd refuse to stream video to HP and Dell computers because those manufacturers hadn't made deals with the services to the latter's liking." Various workarounds are being used to get around the blocks.

7 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. OTOH. Wait... What OH? by hhedeshian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFA: "Ironically, NBC -- one of the networks blocking Google TV -- offers a CNBC Google TV application for fans of its news channel."
    This seems to clearly be a case of one hand not knowing the other hand is doing.

    From T[o]FA: "Google TV isn’t totally a lost cause ... because of the generosity of Comcast ... streams just about everything to Google TV: ABC, NBC, Fox, all but CBS ... The ironic part is that the content seems to be provided by Hulu itself"
    Wait... How many fucking hands do I have?

    Sometimes I really wonder is these media companies are just run by pre-pubescent boys. Does someone have the invitee list to the CEOs' birthday parties?

  2. who's website is it anyway? by burne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been blocking certain sites and services for certain groups like forever. If you live in a specific Asian country you haven't been able to send email to me or any of my users for like ten years.

    It's my website, and I allow or disallow you to see my content. Just like I allow or disallow people to enter my house. Why should things be different when you are Hulu, NBC or anybody/anything else? Within the bounds of law anybody has a right to discriminate.

  3. Re:Allow users to set user-agent/etc themselves by corby · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google should just make an advanced configuration settings page, and let users set whatever user-agent/etc they want there.

    As the linked article states, Google does allow users to set their user-agent. The video content sites are blocking on the Flash Version ID, and Adobe does not provide a mechanism for changing that.

  4. Negative Scarceness. by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more onerous restrictions legitimate services impose, the more people will be drawn towards services that don't impose such restrictions, like thepiratebay.

    Yes, when will corporations realize that information services are not scarcity driven, but are plentitude driven? The more shows that you provide, the more customers you will attract.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  5. Re:who's website is it anyway? by burne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They have the right but that doesn't mean that we have to like it. The reality is that TV used to be free. You put up an antenna and got TV for free. The networks made money by showing commercials.

    If they block you they are not showing their commercials to you, and they are losing money. That is what you should be telling them. Companies need money, rejecting customers is losing money, or at the very least leaving money (that they could earn) to a competitor.

    You don't want goverment stepping in, you want corporate greed winning from stupid RIAA/MPAA-inspired blocks.

  6. Take a lesson out of Google's/Facebook playback by gru3hunt3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm.. well Google ultimately (at the moment) has the most control.

    What they did with the Facebook address book is interesting - they said "you either play nice, or we won't" - and that's a VERY interesting corporate precedent they've established.
    It basically translates into a simple "quid pro quo" - or perhaps even better "we only have to play nice, when others do".

    What I'd like to see Google announce tomorrow --
    Okay NBC, Hulu, etc. our new policy: we won't index sites which decide to arbitrarily support devices due to "incompatible business models" ..

    and poof - from one moment to the next there will be a big black smoking crater where those websites once were in the google index.

    I don't see why Google.com should be expected to maintain a compatibility database for sites, and return different results so they don't accidentally send Google TV viewers to NBC, Hulu, etc. it's probably easier for them to just drop those offending sites until they "work out their technical difficulties".

    Alternatively Google can just put up big red warning messages adjacent to search results that basically say "this site is broken, it may not work correctly" as sort of a warning that "you either fix it, or we'll drop you in 30 days" or something like that.

    "I will shit on the towel of anybody who pee's in the pool."

  7. Re:Google blocking is a 2-way street by whong09 · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.droidforums.net/forum/droid-general-discussions/57157-youtube-blocking-moble-devices.html

    It's legitimate. And it's also happening to me.

    I own a CM6 rooted Froyo android phone and I've had this problem with some youtube videos being inaccessible ever since I've had the phone. That this isn't common knowledge is just surprising.