FBI Watching Oracle-SAP Trial

angry tapir writes "An FBI agent has been in the courtroom each day this week watching the Oracle-SAP trial, suggesting US law enforcement continues to take an interest in the case. SAP said in 2007, when Oracle filed its civil lawsuit against the company, that the Department of Justice had requested documents related to the matter from SAP and its TomorrowNow subsidiary. SAP said at the time that it would 'fully cooperate.' In a court filing in August, SAP said there was an 'ongoing investigation' by the DOJ and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into 'some facts and circumstances that are involved in this matter.'"

Comments

Hello, I'm with the FBI

[Sam_In_The_Hills]

""We have an interest in the case," the FBI agent said in court Thursday. He declined to comment further or provide his name."
If he hadn't spent the day talking into his coat sleeve maybe they wouldn't have spotted him.

What the trial is about

[Migala77]

There is a great summary at ComputerWorld. How I read it: a company bought by SAP is accused of copyright infringement by Oracle. SAP does not deny this, and the trial is basically about the height of the damages. Oracle is making a media circus of it and sues for $ 2 billion, and SAP just wants to get it over with, and is willing to pay tens of millions.

OK..

[js3]

so the FBI is watching them..how is this news for nerds or news for that matter? what's the relevance of this story? An FBI agent goes to work. that's it?

Re:OK..

[glwtta]

Exactly! What happened to stories that are actually important? Like what the Queen of England does online?

Re:OK..

[shougyin]

Our investigation is complete, and revealed you are in fact boring and just overly paranoid. We would suggest getting out some time at a local Bar/Pub of your choosing. Please feel free to keep the tracking device on your vehicles, and use it should you become too intoxicated to find it.

V/R The Government

Re:OK..

[shoehornjob]

so the FBI is watching them..how is this news for nerds or news for that matter? what's the relevance of this story? An FBI agent goes to work. that's it?

It may not be news for nerds but it certainly appeals to the tinfoil hat contingent which seems to be prevelent here on Slashdot.

It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[christoofar]

Too bad it's not a jury of dimwits that gets to determine the award. Then they'll have to ask themselves in a conference room if Larry's crocodile tears are worth excising a large sum of money from one of Germany's largest companies and giving it to a douchebag who already has loads himself.

Maybe if there's some scarlet twist to this suit that hasn't been made public yet----like SAP had intended to modify Oracle's code to make the database columns with German identifiers like SAP's?

I cannot tell you with what joy I have going into transaction SE38, then digging through ABAP code, then trying to figure out what column identifiers (like LOGIKZW, STABPRRT) means...

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[Anonymous Coward]

That's quite an interesting way to put this... When it comes to SAP, you talk about the company as a whole, but when it comes to Oracle, you talk about Larry as an individual and characterize him as a "douchebag". What's the matter? Can't compare apples to apples?

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[arkane1234]

Well, if you think about it, between the two he is kinda the only CEO of the two who is a megalomaniac.

SAP doesn't seem to have a CEO who thinks the very breathing of the company is his own.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[hairyfeet]

While I don't think Larry is a nice guy, and figure he probably IS a giant egotistical ass, in THIS case he is in the right. You buy sioftware A you are allowed packages A-f. If you want G-Z that costs an extra "premium support" contract. What the company that SAP was stupid enough to buy out did was set up a bank of servers to crawl ALL the Oracle servers and grab ALL the files, whether their customers had paid for the Premium package or not, and then undercut Oracle by offering the Premium package (which they had ZERO rights to) at a steep discount.

In this case it would be like going to an OEM that had rights for Windows 7 Basic and offering them Ultimate for $5 a pop, simply because you were able to snatch a copy off of MSDN. Software has licenses and levels whether you like it or not, and in this case they took those that had bought the bottom tier product and gave them all the top tier goodies. I'm sorry but SAP is screwed, the only question is how big a check they are gonna have to cut. You'd think a company of THAT size would have checked out the business they were buying before shelling out the bux just to make sure it was legit.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[christoofar]

I don't dispute that at all. SAP owes money. Question is how much. Did SAP really capitalize and make any gains off the back of Oracle that warrants a gigantic payout by SAP? That's what the trial is all about.

SAP did make some very smart buys by the way. BusinessObjects was probably their best purchase ever and probably was a huge thorn in Oracle's butt... and Leo was lucky to be present on the closing of that deal. Oracle has yet to come up with a decent fully-integrated BI suite to match what BO users are doing with that software. And now that BO is permanently married to SAP, Oracle has to steer their customers away from what is actually quite a nice product.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[hairyfeet]

While I'm sure SAP have made some smart buys, they wouldn't be here if they hadn't, you have to admit this one was a GIANT fuckup. It would be like buying a factory in a really nice area sight unseen, without even bothering to check whether that nice area is a bombed out area of Detroit or the nice factory is sitting on a toxic waste dump.

As for the pay, that should be simple: How much did the company that SAP bought make selling to Oracle customers? Take that figure and add 30% for interest. Otherwise you have a situation where you can do any kind of hinky shit you want as long as you can sell it to another company who'll get a slap on the wrist. Theft is theft, and in this case I would argue it is no different than going to OEMs and selling them "Windows 7 Ultimate Razr1911 Edition". They had NO rights to ANY of what they were pushing, those LIMITED rights were the customers and the customers ONLY (I'm sure old Larry has that pretty much ironclad in the contract) so basically their entire business was nothing but a scam. At the very least I'd say it is worth what SAP paid for the company, since they obviously thought the company was worth that much and their business was built on theft.

To use a /. car analogy: If I get a great deal on a chop shop should I only have to pay a percentage because I didn't bother to even find out where the business I bought was making their money from? In the end it doesn't matter whether you think SAP is great and Larry is a douche (haven't used either companies products but I'll take you word and have seen enough of Ellison to know he is probably an ass) it comes down to whether one can profit by stealing a product to undercut the one who made it. Just imagine the shitfit they'd have here on /. if it was RHEL that was having their code snatched. In the end what is wrong is wrong and SAP is gonna get screwed for this, and rightly so. Whatever moron told them purchasing that company was a good idea needs to be stuck in a hut selling SAP products in Antarctica.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[Anonymous Coward]

That's quite an interesting way to put this... When it comes to SAP, you talk about the company as a whole, but when it comes to Oracle, you talk about Larry as an individual and characterize him as a "douchebag". What's the matter? Can't compare apples to apples?

 
OK, sure, we can do that. Steve Jobs is a douchebag and so is Larry Ellison. I'm not sure that it is relevant to the story, but you did ask.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[mobby_6kl]

That's why we replaced him with two CEOs! As an SAP employee, I can't say Leo did everything right, but it's hard to blame everything on him since he was CEO during the worst recession in recent times.

Re:It's the Larry Ellison Parade

[rve]

IIRC Jammie Thomas owes 1.5 million for 24 songs.

So how much did SAP copy? The equivalent of 240 songs?

That would be a little harsh. How about 20 songs and a porn video?

I wish we had that for SCO

[elronxenu]

An FBI agent watching the courtroom activity might have curbed some of SCO's outrageous behaviour.

Re:Nothing but Oracle-related news here at /.

[longacre]

Slashdot is a news aggregator...it can only link to stories that exist.

Re:Secondary Audio Program?

[leamanc]

Although there used to be several large players in the ERP software business, it basically comes down to SAP and Oracle now. Since Oracle likes to have as few competitors as possible, they filed suit in 2007 against SAP, claiming that SAP's ERP software infringed on Oracle's intellectual property in an effort to cripple SAP, in the hopes of one day being the only player in the large-scale ERP software world.

Re: FBI Watching Oracle-SAP Trial

[Low Ranked Craig]

Citation needed.

Re:Important note for the lawyers

[psbrogna]

The real question for this audience is whether or not we have the right to reverse engineer any devices up our asses.