Slashdot Mirror


What's the Oracle Trial Against SAP Really About?

Ponca City writes "Chris O'Brien writes in the Merucry News that Larry Ellison's lawsuit against bitter rival SAP gives Ellison the opportunity to deliver the final humiliation to his company's greatest foe of the past decade while sending a blunt message to Oracle's next great enemy, Hewlett-Packard: 'This is who you are fighting. This is how determined we are to win. Get ready.' O'Brien writes that it's a crafty bit of psychological warfare that is already having the desired effect. When Oracle decided to subpoena former SAP CEO Léo Apotheker after he was appointed president and CEO of HP, Apotheker decided to stay out of the country to avoid testifying so now we have the bizarre spectacle of the new CEO of the largest technology company in the world unable to show his face in Silicon Valley. Ellison loves to fight. In gaining control of PeopleSoft, Ellison demonstrated the love of combat and confrontation that has made him one of the wealthiest men on the planet. He waged an 18-month hostile takeover bid to acquire the company, and fought off an effort by the US Department of Justice to torpedo the deal. 'Oracle probably could have settled this case [with SAP],' writes O'Brien. 'But why pass up a glorious chance to subpoena Apotheker and send your new opponent running in circles?'"

160 comments

  1. Beautiful... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Simply beautiful, to have your opponent by the throat, and then get a chance to show the whole world what a scoundrel they are

    As a long-time Oracle developer, I have always wondered how they could afford to put so much information on their support site, and I was worried that the 'spying' by SAP was going to make them shut down access to the info.

    Instead we get a show, love the theater!

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Beautiful... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why?
      Because I work with closed source software from a vendor that gives me access to Technical Reference Manuals, complete descriptions of all fields and behaviors of the tables?

      Is it because I enjoy having full access to the pl/sql code in triggers, stored procedures, workflows, forms and reports, which I can then modify to my own purposes and business objectives of my company?

      Or is it that I think SAP acted like a bunch of greedy fucks who gave Oracle very reason to limit my access to the info?

      c'mon anon, show me your mighty insight

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:Beautiful... by PraiseBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing you fit into their corporate culture pretty well...

    3. Re:Beautiful... by walshy007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why?

      Because you are working with a company that would not hesitate to fuck you over the moment it was convenient or the moment you stopped paying up.

      You are entitled to your masochism, but to most here working with oracle now would be akin to being a partner with microsoft of the 90's, sure, on paper you're working together.. expect to get fucked over (except with oracle they wouldn't do it technically, just 4-6 digit licensing fees you weren't expecting).

    4. Re:Beautiful... by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I strongly suspect you have left yourself crippled. Anyone who claims to be a long-time anything has failed to move forwards, has failed to adapt to the changing IT market. Nothing lasts forever and those who fail to keep up-to-date last no longer than the product they are fixed to. Oracle has moved forward. They support grid computing and clustered computing. These require a radically different mindset than those who grew up on monolithic client-server systems. Oracle will doubtless move forward again, exploiting cloud computing techniques. What use will they have for you then?

      Consider this also - companies respect loyalty, but they rarely respect blind loyalty. Spying?! For chrissakes, this isn't the Cold War! Besides, why would these "spies" trust what Oracle said, when a debugger and Wireshark would yield far more? Besides, who would want to spy on Oracle? Their RAC database is impressive in that there are no other major databases that support Infiniband, but other than that their software is ancient, slow, archaic and uncompetitive. Oracle is a has-been. They were a decent company once. Twenty years ago. Today, they're losing ground. Their acquisition of Sun was expensive and has generated few returns.

      As for a lot of information, Oracle doesn't know the meaning of the phrase. Their support site is frankly pathetic. Ingres is of the same era and used to hold many of the same attitudes, but they have matured and adapted to a new environment. Oracle have not. In evolution, those who adapt survive, those who do not die. Size is immaterial. Prime were big. Cray were big. SGI were big. Sun were big. Dinosaurs. And dinosaurs die.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Beautiful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like Oracle.
      I don't like Microsoft.
      I don't like Capitalism carried to its ultimate expression.
      But you folks aren't doing Open Source much benefit by constantly dragging up this microsoft of the 90's meme. You've spent uncounted hours duplicating the Microsoft User Experience and still the majority of people don't give a shit about Open Source, even if they've heard of it. If winning is what it's all about to you then go out there and win it. Develop an OS that blows people's minds. You know, something bigger than a two month fragging about purple and orange. Your hearts are in the right place, and you certainly have the intellectual horsepower. You as a movement have just become culturally inbred. Like Microsoft has. Learn that from your enemy and you'll do well. But you have to put down the banners a bit.

      Oh, and let the man earn his living as he sees fit. "Most here" is a pretty small number in the Big Blue Room.

    6. Re:Beautiful... by KingAlanI · · Score: 4, Funny

      As I've seen elsewhere on /. :

      Move over Darth Gates, it's time for Darth Ellison
      ORACLE = One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    7. Re:Beautiful... by butlerm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Their RAC database is impressive in that there are no other major databases that support Infiniband, but other than that their software is ancient, slow, archaic and uncompetitive.

      You don't seem to be particularly familiar with the merits of the Oracle database server, which is still at least a decade ahead of all of its competitors. I like PostgreSQL, but in most respects it is just starting to achieve the level of flexibility that Oracle had with the release of Oracle 7 some seventeen years ago.

      The special thing about RAC is not Infiniband, it is that RAC is one of the only symmetric multi-node relational databases available. The IBM equivalent was until recently only available on mainframes. I am not aware if there are any others.

      If that were not the case, given the cost, there would be no new major applications designed around Oracle at all. Or DB2 for that matter.

    8. Re:Beautiful... by the_womble · · Score: 1

      I like PostgreSQL, but in most respects it is just starting to achieve the level of flexibility that Oracle had with the release of Oracle 7 some seventeen years ago.

      Can you elaborate? I have never really found a good explanation of how well PostgreSQL compares to the high end proprietary RDBMSs, or even of how well they compare to each other.

    9. Re:Beautiful... by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree with the AC that you are a retard. But I have to comment on this:

      Because I work with closed source software from a vendor that gives me access to Technical Reference Manuals, complete descriptions of all fields and behaviors of the tables? Is it because I enjoy having full access to the pl/sql code in triggers, stored procedures, workflows, forms and reports, which I can then modify to my own purposes and business objectives of my company?

      A lot of companies/people seem to think that's one of the benefits of closed source software, you get to pay for the privilege of accessing some "Knowledgebase" (with "Technical Reference Manuals", FAQs, HOWTOs, whitepapers etc) and get "Support" etc.

      When the fact is with stuff like Postgresql, you often don't need all that because you get to
      1) See the technical details and similar stuff for free
      2) Post a question on a mailing list, to which the developers reply without any marketing/PR bullshit involved.

      I've dealt with OSS and closed source stuff. And there've been many times with the latter that they ask $$$ for access to find out something that would be found by Google if it was OSS.

      --
    10. Re:Beautiful... by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Except for those of us that actually make money based on applications that the database drives.

      Are you trying to say MySQL or Postgresql are equal to Oracle in performance, reliability, or documentation? While Oracle does suck as a company their database core business is rock solid for a lot of good reasons. Of course if you venture outside the one thing Oracle does well heaven help you.

    11. Re:Beautiful... by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While I agree with you on principle, Oracle documentation is second to none and that's better than having to post to some mailing list and then having to send configs along with version dependencies. I would so there are lots of pros and cons of both sides of this. Google is not a great way to get documentation on something specific. Just yesterday I was searching for the cause to one-way communication between an Asterisk 1.4 and an Asterisk 1.6 box that had been upgraded from 1.4 and was using the same config. It took a very long time. Contrast that with virtually any Oracle issue which can be resolved within ten minutes on Metalink or if things really get hairy, within two hours via a support request.

      Often times you do get what you pay for even if you have to pay too much to get it. I'll agree most of that should be free and in the interest of adoption of product lines that would actually probably be a smart move from a business standpoint. I look at all the people running away from Sun servers because everything is hidden away now by Oracle so its easy to see that hiding the documentation just makes people look for something more open.

      Oracle is in serious trouble these days despite their spending spree, they lack focus and it shows in their product line. I think most people would agree that you only use Oracle for the database, all of their other apps are simply a joke with open source alternatives being very attractive for reporting and collaboration. ERP options still appear to be lacking but the concept as a whole seems to going away anyway. That's probably why Oracle wanted Sun, to have a complete platform for their database completely supported from head to toe the way Apple does it.

    12. Re:Beautiful... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I don't have any experience with Oracle support.

      Can you give an example of an Oracle issue that you solved with Metalink in 10 minutes, that a similar scale problem with Postgresql wouldn't be solved with a Google search? Or for the hairy things, wouldn't be solved by an email to the postgresql mailing list? The postgresql developers seem very responsive to me (assuming your email is reasonable and descriptive - and even so I've seen useful replies to pretty crappy emails :) ).

      That said, from the Vendor's perspective, artificial scarcity is a good thing for them. Tons of companies are still willing to pay to access stuff that the vendor intentionally keeps from them. Customers even think it's a feature :). So unless it starts hurting the vendors, it's a viable business strategy. Good also are training and certification schemes - which can be more expensive when technical info about your product is so restricted.

      --
    13. Re:Beautiful... by butlerm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately, many of these things are only learned through hard experience, working on multiple database platforms and then trying to port what works on one to an alternative.

      The biggest difference I already mentioned - symmetric multi-node scalability for a single database. So called "shared nothing" database clusters (different nodes host different tables or table partitions) have been common in proprietary databases for many years. I believe there are variants of PostgreSQL out there that can do that.

      Oracle pioneered symmetric "shared everything" relational database clusters with Oracle Parallel Server in the late 80s. I understand IBM did the same thing on mainframes with DB2 on Parallel Sysplex a few years later. PostgreSQL doesn't do symmetric clustering yet, but I imagine it will a few years down the road.

      On paper, DB2 (for example) is the rough equivalent of Oracle. In practice, developers and DBAs run into enough obstacles doing simple things like alter table operations that Oracle is much easier to administer once it is set up properly. In addition, in Oracle you can do all sorts of database administration operations online without interrupting running applications. More recent versions can rebuild an index while there are active transactions against a table, for example.

      My PostgreSQL experience is a little old. The most annoying problem I had was that numeric types needed to match in queries for the optimizer to work properly. I would join a SMALLINT column to an INTEGER column or literal and the index would be ignored. That may be fixed, I don't know. Oracle by contrast uses a uniform NUMBER type comparable to DECIMAL in most databases for everything, which is very convenient. You can increase the numeric precision or scale of any column in constant time, for example. DB2 traditionally required a table export and reload to do this.

      If you store integers in 16 bit fields, it is usually tricky to change them all to 32 bit fields without at least stopping all transactions and rewriting every row (which is what PostgreSQL does). Oracle uses variable precision BCD number storage for everything to avoid that problem. I don't know if active transactions can run against a PostgreSQL table while a column type is being altered or not. In any case, you get the idea.

      Oracle has an outstanding cost based query optimizer, that can handle views that are built on top of several other layers of views without much of a problem. I haven't tested that in PostgreSQL lately, but what I could really use with the latter are updateable views that filter on session variables. Oracle has PL/SQL "packages" that can store session specific state. Views can refer to package variables such that they limit the rows delivered to a user in that session, which is extremely handy for making virtual private databases.

      There are just lots of these kind of things which have been added to Oracle simply due to a very high end client base willing to pay very high rates for the latest and greatest "enterprise edition" stuff. If you don't need the EE stuff, and don't need lots of cores, Oracle is just about as expensive as any other proprietary database, including relatively weak databases like MySQL (now that Oracle owns it) or commercially supported/tweaked versions of PostgreSQL like EnterpriseDB.

    14. Re:Beautiful... by walshy007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you trying to say MySQL or Postgresql are equal to Oracle in performance, reliability, or documentation?

      I'm saying that oracle is becoming more and more irrelevant, as some high scale deployments of other software shows.

      Some licensing schemes with oracle can wind up costing companies almost a million dollars per year. That equates to quite a few extra full time employed database administrators.. which would more than be able to make up for any perceived lack of documentation etc.

      There really are very few scenarios left where you actually need oracle for your database.

    15. Re:Beautiful... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      The majority of Open Source projects have shitty, old or no documentation at all.

      Sure, you can download the code and look at it, but it is time consuming and stupid.

      Sure you can post a question to a forum or mailing list... nevertheless the majority of times I have done that (dokeos/chamilo, Ogre3D, codeigniter, firefox, openoffice, etc), I haven't got an answer.

      Compare that to say MSDN, which is a great reference library for a closed source technology.
      That is mainly because the company behind it PAYS someone to maintain such documentation.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    16. Re:Beautiful... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Some licensing schemes with oracle can wind up costing companies almost a million dollars per year.

      I think they can cost almost that much to administer. I once got involved in trying to work out how much the hell we owed them and it was huge PITA to just extract the stuff out of our sales system. This was partly our fault (we hadn't captured some of the relevant info before) but mainly theirs because we hadn't needed to under the simpler old method.

      In fact it was mainly our management's fault. One, for agreeing to the change (though perhaps they didn't have much choice) and two, because they only informed IT 6 months later when they expected a spreadsheet full of the magic lovely numbers to miraculously fall from heaven.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    17. Re:Beautiful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of closed source products have shitty, old or no documentation at all too.

      I've posted questions on both OSS and MS's forums and got no useful answers from both.

      I've used the MSDN stuff for Win32 API docs and they're not that good - some stuff on window handling and task bar buttons was ambiguous (e.g. how do you determine if a window "shows up" on the taskbar as taskbar button). So I go to Raymond Chen's blog and see his post on the topic, and later on I find out he's wrong too (and have to get the answer from elsewhere plus figure some undocumented stuff out).

    18. Re:Beautiful... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1
      Our company does, and it rarely goes like this:

      Contrast that with virtually any Oracle issue which can be resolved within ten minutes on Metalink or if things really get hairy, within two hours via a support request.

      In our experience it's "Oh, it's not a priority 1 issue (meaning we're suffering downtime in a production site)? We'll get to it when we feel like it".

    19. Re:Beautiful... by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      plus figure some undocumented stuff out

      For me that's the killer of closed source. For open source rare problems are often unfixed but well documented in blog posts that contain long strings of profanity typically ending in "I can't believe that X works like this". Closed source tends to have shaky uncertain explanations on how people think things function. Since only a hand full of people in the whole world have the access to reverse engineer the problem correctly no one really knows what is going on.

      I'm ignoring the power to read the code your self because while I have needed to resort to that in the past
      1) most people don't have time to
      2) jumping in to another code base is typically a lengthy process and people typically don't have the time to do it for a minor bug.
      Having said that. It's the ultimate "oh god I need to fix this no matter what and time is not a issue" documentation.

    20. Re:Beautiful... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >The majority of Open Source projects have shitty, old or no documentation at all.

      PostgreSQL is not in this set.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    21. Re:Beautiful... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I've dealt with OSS and closed source stuff. And there've been many times with the latter that they ask $$$ for access to find out something that would be found by Google if it was OSS.

      And, in fairness, some of us have tried looking for something related to OSS only to find that the closest thing is a 6 year old question on a forum that nobody answered or some snot-nosed little git saying "RTFM".

      Sometimes, chasing down the docs for OSS stuff is either impossible, or way more work than it should be. I can definitely see that for some organizations the paid access to the good documentation is more valuable than the free access to non-existent/crappy documentation.

      Not defending Oracle, but having seen both sides of this coin, sometimes the paid support model works well too. Open Source is not a magic bullet -- sometimes, either the doc or the product isn't really usable.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:Beautiful... by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      The problem with your statement is that the reason it's news for Skype is because nobody has done it before. I have always considered Postgresql the best of the open source options out there but it has always been behind commercial options like Oracle and DB/2. Only recently has MS SQL caught up with enough features to start making them attractive but Postgresql is almost always a better choice in that tier.

      It is routine for Oracle to handle large datasets. Everyone else that has done it with things like MySQL had to put a lot of time into development and experienced lots of crushing downtime in the process of scale out.

      Of course at the rate Postgresql has been advancing I wouldn't be surprised if in another five years they can match Oracle for 90% of functionality. Oracle should have been more concerned with that rather than mysql which is horribly pale in comparison.

    23. Re:Beautiful... by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything couldn't be solved with a Google search, I merely said that it would take a lot longer. I've spent an hour on Google looking for Postgresql bits for installation, configuration, and maintanence, things that are all in a central location on Metalink for Oracle.

      I'm constantly irritated that patches are hidden away as I see that as a giant negative against the company. If you sold me a defective product and you've done the work of fixing the defect you should distribute it to the rest of the community to make sure that the public image of your product is as something of high quality.

      Oracle installers are well known to be a pain in the ass, through Metalink I can find step by step directions on how to get it running on Ubuntu or CentOS containing all the necessary links to packages that the Oracle installer will want complete with specific versions so as to certify the installation. Of course I wouldn't do anything like that for a production environment, but certainly for development.

      I had the misfortune of having to do an install without Metalink access for a while and had to Google around, you were talking days before kernel parameters and package requirements were fully met. I created an installation guide so that I wouldn't have to go through that pain again but a lot of time was wasted.

      There are valid paths to get the information for other products but no other database software is as well documented as Oracle. Mailing lists and Google searches have a wealth of information in them, they are just scattered and not always to the put. Like my Asterisk problem I found it in a random forum. The answer could also have been obtained through any number of other mailing lists but why would I want to go through the trouble when I have a purpose built environment for it with Oracle?

      I'm glad Postgresql has made such progress in the last few years, they are a viable alternative to most setups these days and that will eventually put pressure on Oracle to be more reasonable, and if not, I've got a perfectly good alternative.

    24. Re:Beautiful... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Sure, let's say that there is some customization that I developed and it starts throwing ORA-6000 errors after an upgrade or patch, some optimized query starts runnin reeeeeeaaaaaaallllllyyyyy slow, or some basic functionality, well ceases to function.

      First thing, I hit the alert log, or at least write down the full text of the original error message

      I can do a few things at this point... search google, talk to my co-workers, maybe just get a cup of coffee and dig around in guts for a while.

      What I have learned in past decade and a half, is to go to Metalink, do a quick search on the exact text of the error message and open a support ticket if I fail to get a hit on it.

      Basic breakdown, at least half of my searches on error messages get a hit on a known bug, the appropriate patch and a fairly detailed breakdown of what all the patch touches and what else it may break.

      Of the half that end up getting a support ticket; I manage to figure out a fair number by searching or figuring out on my own, some get caught by the first line of support (although some reps try and blame it on the end user, more on that later) and every now and then some get all the way back to development and we are given some sort of work around until there is a patch created.

      Rarely, only two or three times for myself, an actual, never-before-seen, bug is found and we get to kid each other for a few days about killing the gary-bug or some such thing.

      So, yeah I would say that half of the problems that I have to go to metalink for get resolved fairly quickly via a patch of a known bug. Call it ten minutes if you want, it is usually a hell of a lot faster than searching google and any number of developer blogs to find anything even remotely as suitable as a one-off patch that corrects the situation.

      That said, metalink is not without problems. We had to learn not to open support tickets during a certain portion of the day because the tech who picked them up would invariably attempt to put the blame on us and claim that Oracle support could not help us. That would lead to angry call to the duty manager, and finally waiting until Australia was picking up our calls to get a tech who would really figure out the problem.

      Then there is the prioritization that Oracle sets on each call. Basically, you had better have a downed production server to get level one support (24x7 with your issue being pushed from tech to tech as timezones shift around the globe) where things usually get resolved in short order. If that isn't fast enough for you, there is also an escalated level 1, do not plan on sleeping while it is open, they expect you to answer your phone at any time of day, and will even lower the assigned level if you are not willing to work it along with them.

      So... what's the down side?

      Cash, simple as that... it costs a lot of money to get that sort of support, and as a 24x7 company that provides an essential product that is literally a 'life or death' issue for hundreds of thousands of Americans a year, we are willing to make that sort of investment. Honestly, if you step into the Oracle arena and do NOT think that you are going to spend a few hundred thousand bucks a year on support and upgrades, then you are just a fucking fool

      As far as being a dinosaur goes, I got my dba and developer training and certs in 1997, kept them current when appropriate, or learned new tech as needed. At this point half the customizations we do are pretty much vanilla pl/sql concurrent programs or (old style) reports. There has been a fair amount of workflow (pl/sql behind a gui) and XML work to support the new web interface, and some extension of the Oracle APIs via pl/sql packages to .NET via EDO (or whatever flavor MS is pushing today). I have to admit that I am not one tenth as good in C# or Java as I am in pl/sql, but at least I can represent for Oracle while my other team members rip up the roads with C# and Java. It is entirely possible that I can wade through the rest of my career doing Oracle work (20 odd years to go), or a just rest in the shallows of management wasting the youngster's time with my back-in-the-day stories...

      zzzz! Hey, you damn kids get offa my lawn!

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
  2. Larry Ellison's character by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've known a few people like that, very combative types. They tend to wind up being very lonely and pathetic later in life.

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:Larry Ellison's character by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ellison is a narcissist, like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc. Those types usually never are introspective enough to realize what miserable people they are, and they're surrounded by enough sycophants that it seems on the surface that they aren't lonely.

    2. Re:Larry Ellison's character by countSudoku() · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and they try and fill it up with Japanese Zen gardens and big yachts. No amount of money can make you happy, it takes an ability to work with others and a comfort in one's abilities and successes, however small. Larry is like a really loud and obnoxious Richard "Beardy" Branson, only without any charisma, or charm, or wit, or courage, or sense of adventure, or fair play. Yes, nothing at all like Beardy Branson. Larry is just a really amazing, rich, successful, single-minded, asshole. :) And that's being kind. Solaris has paid my way thus far, and now I go on without Oracle. I'm much better off for it. It's motivate me to learn real computer languages like Perl and C. Glad I skipped Java, as that looks and sounds and smells like a big chunk of Oracle shit to me now. Being closed has many disadvantages. Not the least of which is their lack of goodwill. This will bite them in the ass in good time. Meanwhile... Linux, Perl, VMware awaits. But, if you have the $$ and the Oracle wares at your shop, I'll be glad to work them for you for a much heftier price... yes, suddenly working in an Oracle shop just got way fucking expensive... for them. Oracle, just pay my way and then get the fuck out of my way. I've got no time for lucky CEOs and their wacky horseshit behaviour.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    3. Re:Larry Ellison's character by icebike · · Score: 1

      If they survive.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Larry Ellison's character by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. We need fewer of these people on the planet. I can't tell if this is legal game playing or if this is just someone's interpretation of the events. But one thing for sure, this isn't "business." And Oracle is turning into quite a monster. I am sad to say that we will soon have their product in my IT shop soon. After seeing much of this going on, I would rather see MS SQL server installed.

    5. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Loneliness is being surrounded by psychophants.

      With enough corporate income, one is fairly doomed to sycophant overload.

      --

      I for one welcome our new sycophant overlords.

    6. Re:Larry Ellison's character by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are just jealous. All three people you mentioned created multi-billion companies out of nothing, employed hundreds of thousands of people, paid billions in taxes. They have each had more influence on your life than just about anybody else except perhaps your parents. Maybe you are right about the narcissism but it takes obsessive, driven types to do what they did even if they might not be the nicest people to hang out with.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    7. Re:Larry Ellison's character by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I'm not. I don't want their money. I don't want their power. I don't want their problems. I certainly don't want their personalities. I think it's very sad to characterize success by money. And I'd rather be a person who my friends would like to hang out with rather than someone who created a business entity that brings in a lot of pieces of green paper. As for your statement that they have had "more influence" on my life than just about anybody else that's just absurd.

    8. Re:Larry Ellison's character by FilthCatcher · · Score: 1

      surrounded by psychopants?!?!
      disturbing and terrifying maybe but not lonely.
      Or maybe that just the sicophant in me... ;-)

    9. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The subtext of your post there is that they should be worshipped and revered as a result. Despite behaving like sociopaths, despite (in the case of MS) anti-competitive, harmful actions, despite wasting a hell of a lot of taxpayer cash in the courtroom, despite being involved in the dirty and broken aspects of western democracy....

      Yeah, I'd love to have all that money, but it's true that I don't have the instinct to fuck everyone else over to get there. I don't think that's a personality type that the rest of us should aspire to, let alone worship.

    10. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ellison is a narcissist, like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc.

      You seem to have information that very few are privy to- You must know these men well. Tell us more.

    11. Re:Larry Ellison's character by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Do you know what sycophant means? It's just funny that parent post specifically mentions that as being one of the downsides of being wealthy, then you immediately play to type.

    12. Re:Larry Ellison's character by (H)elix1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've actually talked to the man on a few occasions - right time and right place for a 5'th level peasant in my case. The bit that most of this thread seems to miss is this guy *really* understands the technical details as well as the business end. If you ask why, he can and does answer. He will also make a decision - unlike many management of (former, now acquired) companies and even change course when something does not pan out. His play style, in the business world, reminds me of the Adaptive AI in SupCom:FA.

      Honestly, he seemed human.

    13. Re:Larry Ellison's character by treeves · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What does it mean to be miserable without even realizing it? Is that even possible? Insufferable perhaps, but how can there be misery without awareness?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    14. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ellison is a narcissist, like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc. Those types usually never are introspective enough to realize what miserable people they are, and they're surrounded by enough sycophants that it seems on the surface that they aren't lonely.

      The best part is neither of these two fuckwads (that is, Jobs and Ellison) have any chance of becoming as wealthy as Gates was at the top of his game. And I doubt these stooges will match or exceed him in their combined philanthropy either. Gates is likely to remain (for the foreseeable future) the king of machiavellian business tactics with a twist of basic humility.

    15. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just jealous. All three people you mentioned created multi-billion companies out of nothing, employed hundreds of thousands of people, paid billions in taxes. They have each had more influence on your life than just about anybody else except perhaps your parents. Maybe you are right about the narcissism but it takes obsessive, driven types to do what they did even if they might not be the nicest people to hang out with.

      My guess by reading this is that you're no more than 25-years-old. And yes that is relevant to conversation, lest someone, say 15-years-old, who's still wrestling with trying to decide what is and isn't important in life, whiffs your turd of a thought and decidedly she smells the sweet scent of wisdom. There is no wisdom in narcissism and obsession. It is a lonely trip to the bottom. No one has you covered. And you drown in a sea of your own shit.

    16. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      People are what they are and do what they do. It's almost like complaining about the weather: it happens because that's what the sky does. Still, it would be a great pleasure to slug Ellison...or better yet, bring him down with PostgreSql.

    17. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Torvac · · Score: 1

      shotgun to the face can cure this. strange but this type of human really often cures themselfes with a shotgun. the financial crisis showed it, instead of facing consequences use the suicide shortcut.

    18. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great words uttered by the masses:
      No amount of success can make you happy! "The unsucessfull"
      No amount of wealth can make you happy! "The poor"
      No amount of knowlege can make you happy! "The unintelligent"
      No amount of friends can make you happy! "The antisocial"
      No amount of sex can make you happy! "The sexless"

      Personally I have found that all can make me happy, of cause you cannot rely on any one to bring a constent sense of all embrasing happyness, there is no "happily ever after" in real life. But to say that money can't make you happy is just plain dumb and narrow sighted. Sure alot of guys on the top are assholes, but they are in fact very happy assholes who live rich lives filled with countless elements which make them happy, and you can't deny this simply because of your pettiness or jealousy.

    19. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's a personality type that the rest of us should aspire to, let alone worship.

      And yet you live in a socioeconomic system which not only tolerates, but actively encourages that kind of behavior. It's practically a recipe for success!

    20. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, and to give Gates credit, I think, unlike the other two, he has at least grown out of it.

      He seems a much more mellowed character nowadays, and seems to spend a lot more time with his family, lonely is one thing that I do not think describes Gates at all.

      Perhaps that's what retirement from the game brings, maybe when Ellison and Jobs step down they too will grow up and realise there are more important things than business and money, I guess we'll see.

      I think it's also illustrated by Gate's interest in philanthropy along with the likes of Buffet, something that Jobs and Ellison don't even understand the concept of. For all Gates did wrong when running Microsoft, I think it's unfair to put him in the same category as Ellison, Jobs, and possibly even Zuckerberg, although to be fair in the case of Zuckerberg we may well be able to put it down to his young age, perhaps he'll grow out of it too. I would also argue Eric Schmidt is in this category, but certainly Larry Page and Sergey Brin don't seem to be which is probably why Google sways back and forth between doing evil and doing good- at least it has some people who balance it out.

    21. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Mazzie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody has ever lay on their death bed and uttered with their final breath, "I wish I had more money."

      --
      Having a bookmark to Google does not make you an expert on everything.
    22. Re:Larry Ellison's character by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      The saying goes, money does not buy happiness, but it lets you choose your own form of misery.

    23. Re:Larry Ellison's character by nametaken · · Score: 1

      In principle I'd like to agree, but a "business entity that brings in a lot of pieces of green paper" means many thousands of people have jobs, feed their families, get to live in nice homes, have nice things, etc. All because of just one of these co's.

      Businesses are not evil. Some people are.

    24. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the mindset of 90% of the 'conservative' voters that you're seeing there.

    25. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Just looking at Bill Gates: he was born in a rich, well-connected family. His grand father was a national bank president, his father a prominent lawyer, his mother was on the board of directors for First Interstate BancSystem and the United Way. He went to an expensive prep school and from there to Harvard. His mother probably had a lot to do with the fact that his company got that contract with IBM.

      He really had every advantage in life. This doesn't mean his accomplishments aren't real, but saying he created a huge company out of nothing is pushing it.

    26. Re:Larry Ellison's character by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Nobody has ever lay on their death bed and uttered with their final breath, "I wish I had more money."

      What if they died because they couldn't afford surgery or drugs?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    27. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, he seemed human.

      That's the nicest thing you can come up with? OK, so he's not a bot. He's still an asshole.

    28. Re:Larry Ellison's character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or shot dead. One has to wonder how long it's going to be before someone starts putting bullets in heads of assholes like this.

    29. Re:Larry Ellison's character by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Hah. More influence? How exactly? I have never owned anything remotely related to Apple, or Oracle. MS? What about them? You think if IBM had gone the Apple route, the clone wars wouldn't have happened in some shape? Maybe with DEC, HP, Sun?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    30. Re:Larry Ellison's character by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The implication being that without them those people would all be out of jobs, which just isn't the case. It's like an ER doctor saying that if it wasn't for him, all these people would die, with the implication that if the hospital hadn't hired him they wouldn't have hired anybody else either and the ER would be unmanned during his shift.

  3. Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oracle seems to be an EXTREMELY abusive company.

    Let's route around it. One way: Use PostgreSQL.

    Some billionaires only care about being able to abuse people.

    1. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle seems to be an EXTREMELY abusive company.

      I remember when I was working in IT (years and years ago) Oracle set its pricing based on what they thought the company would pay, which if true shows you what kind of corporate culture you're dealing with.

    2. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In capitalism, supplier set prices based on what they think buyers will pay. If you don't like Oracle, you probably don't like America and capitalism either.

    3. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate all those things to some degree, but I hate overcooked asparagus more.

    4. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is commerce and there is abusive commerce. Eventually those who engage in abusive commerce are replaced. Before the abusive companies are replaced, it is miserable to work there.

    5. Re:Avoid Oracle by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      guess what.. that's normal capitalist behavior. Companies actually have a DUTY to do that.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    6. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate the way it makes my pee smell.

    7. Re:Avoid Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate the way it makes my pee smell.

      Then stop smelling your pee!

    8. Re:Avoid Oracle by wzzzzrd · · Score: 1
      No. There is no such thing as "abusive commerce". If the company abides the law, it is just commerce. Maximizing profits, nothing else. The laws they abide may be not to your liking, but that's politics and philosophy. And what you call "abusive companies" are the most successful ones (MS, Oracle, Oil Industries, etc). This is what capitalism is about. Just read Adams, and then read Marx (take both with a grain of salt). Apart from his political agenda, Marx' analysis of capitalism is brilliant.

      There is commerce and there is abusive commerce. Eventually those who engage in abusive commerce are replaced.

      I'd say it's the other way round. Have a look at the textile industry ("made in Bangladesh").

      --
      On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
    9. Re:Avoid Oracle by zhong-guo-1 · · Score: 0

      Oracle set its pricing based on what they thought the company would pay, which if true shows you what kind of corporate culture you're dealing with.

  4. Sybase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have no clue if this is important in this discussion, but SAP acquired Sybase earlier this year.

    1. Re:Sybase by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, it quite likely is. Oracle doesn't like competition, and for SAP to have a database they can now tune to their products --- that's not something that will sit at all well with Oracle.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Sybase by zhong-guo-1 · · Score: 0

      Can I run a website with this? No. We are still making incompatible changes, and certainly do not believe the code is production quality. Right now we are defaulting many configure operations to generate debugging code for us so our binaries are not optimal. support one of the official forks. official fork sounds paradoxical. What should we call a fork whose only reason for being is to keep something free? Let's call it a frork. Or in the case of Maria and L'Office, a frorakle.

  5. The real question by cosm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will Ellison's douchemonkeyness detriment the people? The community? If his fights are just and his gains are pure and the losses he causes others to incur do not get passed onto the populace, cool. Otherwise, I don't think they're going to have too many friends after the dust settles.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  6. HP - Largest Technology company? by Altus · · Score: 1

    By what measure?

    Sounds wrong to me and I cant find a measure by which they would be the largest, but maybe there is one.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    1. Re:HP - Largest Technology company? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Only one I see is Fortune 500 rank, which is probably the sketchiest measure of all. Largely, how much revenue they recently moved without regard for customer base or profits.

      If going by $ profit, they trail companies including IBM.
      If going by profit margin, obviously by above they lose to everyone they lose to above.
      If going by market cap, they lose to IBM and Apple at least.

      Apple or IBM depending on your opinion probably fairly could claim it.

      I don't know about employee count, reliable public numbers are more than one google away for the biggest companies and I'm too lazy to do more than that.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:HP - Largest Technology company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By what measure?

      Sounds wrong to me and I cant find a measure by which they would be the largest, but maybe there is one.

      HP's certainly near, if not at, the top if one were to consider *everything*.

      Somehow I doubt Oracle's terribly interested in desktops and consumer grade printers though. Servers, maybe, but given the bushwacking Oracle's done to Sun, it doesn't seem to be their prime interest, either. As for the rest - IBM's a much larger, nicer target. But then, IBM's got Nazgul, whereas HP's only form of evil was potential Senator from California Smeagol, who they happily canned ages ago.

      Ah, that's it. Ellison needs to find a new opponent to continue his douchebaggery, but he's quickly running out of targets that would provide a fight stacked in Oracle's favor. :p

    3. Re:HP - Largest Technology company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM hands down.

  7. Larry, what is best in life? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!

    --
    That is all.
  8. HP's biggest mistake by u19925 · · Score: 1

    Firing Hurd was one thing, but hiring Apothekar was a total disastrous. In connection to this, Jack Welsh mentioned that he wouldn't admit knowing anyone in HP board even if knew anyone. These are rather strong words coming from a neutral person who was declared manager of the century in 1999. HP was fully aware of SAP-Oracle lawsuit going on and also of the fact that SAP had accepted the blame and Apothekar was the CEO at the time TomorrowNow was stealing. HP got what it deserved or wanted.

    1. Re:HP's biggest mistake by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dunno. Think about this. If HP's CEO "happens" to end up in a country with no corporate tax, the company can move its "official" HQ there. Instant tax haven - and one that any revision of tax laws couldn't do much about because it would involve the CEO and not just some unused office with only a janitor in it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:HP's biggest mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      declared manager of the century in 1999.

      Was that before or after he was cheating on his wife? (I know, that doesn't matter. I threw it out because people are very complicated, and these sorts of awards are facile and simplistic.)

    3. Re:HP's biggest mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If Jack Welch had stayed at GE another few years, it would have imploded. GE is only now recovering from his hollowing out of the company. His arrogance in the Honeywell debacle finally did him in, thank goodness. Now if only they can stop their lame-o ads, they might stand a chance.

      If you are a Welch fan, feel free to keep kissing his sorry ass.

    4. Re:HP's biggest mistake by yuhong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, I know! The saddest part of it, however, is that even if current MBA courses have stopped teaching the flawed theories used by Jack Welch (like cutting costs), there are still many MBAs from that age who still believe in them. Board of directors needs to stop giving them jobs as CEOs. Finance would I think be a better job for them.

    5. Re:HP's biggest mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is cost cutting a flawed theory?

    6. Re:HP's biggest mistake by ushering05401 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This isn't my area, but perennial cost cutting was the problem. After a solid start reducing fat and focusing on core missions, old Jack ended up going off the rails simply because the money kept rolling.

      His philosophy shared a great deal in common with the a very unpopular practice in modern governance known as a strategy of tensions.

      He wanted to keep up to 10% of the talent force on steady march out the door regardless of their performance and regardless of how well things were going. This cost cutting measure depends upon the other 90% not leaping to the conclusion that an arbitrary management will eventually come for them as well... And hoping that they instead believe there was something inferior about the 10%; hoping that they will strive to validate the faith of retention that their fearless leader has placed in them. Not a good situation.

      Then there was the idea to cut all involvement in any endeavor where the company was not challenging for the crown of industry leader. This of course removes innovation and cross-pollination leaving the remaining servants absent vision and experience coming from outside their own little box.

      Wikipedia claims he was known as Neutron Jack. I think that may be taking it a little too far, but you get the point.

  9. slashdot unbiased? by kwoff · · Score: 1

    What database does slashdot run on, by the way?

    1. Re:slashdot unbiased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft SQL Server?

  10. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have some serious problems with names. Their names are Léo Apotheker and Jack Welch.

  11. What is it with technology companies? by dave562 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These companies are situated in the center of one of the largest changes in human history. Computers and software applications have enabled numerous advances in civilization and benefitted society in countless ways. Despite all the good that has come from computers, it seems like without exception, every single large computer company is lead by a bunch of douche bags who apparently have little concern for anything beyond themselves and their vision of how they want things to be.

    1. Re:What is it with technology companies? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, because software that is designed by an unfocused group people with no direction is sooooooo useful.

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:What is it with technology companies? by PraiseBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      every single large is lead by a bunch of douche bags

      Do you think the Roman empire grew to its size by being nice? Every group in history that gains considerable power is led by power-hungry people. Luckily for our species, most people are content with being in love, raising a family, and enjoying life with friends and loved ones.

      A few individuals are cursed with a "vision", and have an overwhelming desire to force other people to play along. I'd wager they are extremely dissatisfied with life, despite their massive wealth and power.

    3. Re:What is it with technology companies? by Trintech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you think the Roman empire grew to its size by being nice?

      No, I wouldn't say they were necessarily nice but one of the major reasons the Romans succeeded in creating such a vast empire was because they absorbed the culture of the people that they were conquering. This made the transition easier and made revolt far less likely because, in general, people don't care what ruler they are paying tribute (taxes) to; they only care if the amount goes up or it changes how they live their lives.

      I think Oracle et al. could learn a lot from the Roman approach.

    4. Re:What is it with technology companies? by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If by absorbing you mean killing one third, enslaving another third, leaving the last third of the population shiver in fear, then yes, the Romans did absorb the culture of people they were conquering (Gaul).

      I'm not sure what kind of fairy tails you've been reading, but the Romans were the most ruthless culture of their age. By looking at the remains of Sun, yes, we can say Oracle has learned from the Roman approach.

    5. Re:What is it with technology companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux? Eclipse? GIMP? BSD? Apache? Perhaps you consider foundations to be a "focused" group, so how about Python? PHP? RoR? GZip? Postfix? Subversion? And the list goes on...

      Your claim is foolish.

    6. Re:What is it with technology companies? by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      The sum total of the "Roman Flaw" was that they spent a couple centuries correcting the grammar of their enemies. Measuring the difference between a Centurion and oneself leads to an understanding of the Centurion and the choice of whether to reveal enough of oneself to be likewise understood.

      So they were ruthless, but also naive in the extreme when measured by aggregate fruits of their labors.

      The establishment of the HRE fixed this by introducing handshake executions to replace the spectacles required to constantly assert the fidelity of each facet of the previously multi-homed religious state. This predictably lead to a Unionized structure as the faith among hand-shakers weathered the centuries.

      When you know the opponent both kills at one remove and is desirous that the action be conducted off-screen, your primary concern must be infiltrating the centers of discourse and judgment directly - by default agreeing to "When in Rome..." and entering the realm of battle outside the box being commanded by state changes cascading from judgments taking place within the box.

      I wonder if any of this stuff still applies today? Please excuse me while I go reflect upon my own public displays by examination of your interpretation of the very public displays of our opponents.

    7. Re:What is it with technology companies? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Too many friends, no chance of love or family, and too much intellect hunger for power. God save the world from me. Slash that. God save the world from Slashdotters. I wonder why there never was the technological equivalent of Columbine.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  12. en.swpat.org by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rustling up a quick summary here for anyone looking for background:

    http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Oracle_v._SAP_(2010,_USA)

    1. Re:en.swpat.org by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Well, this seems to be about copyright, not patent infringement. I have edited the wiki.

    2. Re:en.swpat.org by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's always the right thing to do when there seems to be an error.

      This lawsuit is about copyright *and* patents, so I've further edited the wiki to mention patents again.

    3. Re:en.swpat.org by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Well, I just read the final complaint and it has nothing to do with patents:
      http://www.oracle.com/sapsuit/complaint.pdf

    4. Re:en.swpat.org by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's very strange. I'm reading it now...

    5. Re:en.swpat.org by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      My initial reading agrees with you.

      I've made a section to document this. Either we should explain that the journalists are all wrong, or maybe we'll find that the court documents somehow avoid mentioning the object of the dispute (I know, that sounds unlikely).

      http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Oracle_v._SAP_(2010,_USA)#Help:_Is_it_about_patents.3F

  13. Peoplesoft by slapout · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want Peoplesoft?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Peoplesoft by Nimey · · Score: 1

      They were a competitor, an obstacle to be removed. That's why.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Peoplesoft by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Easy. If Oracle owns all the names that the Pointy-Hair Bosses know about, Oracle rules the people with the money. Those who actually use the product? They have no say. Neither do any of the technical folk. So why would Oracle care about them?

      However, it is a dangerous game to play. IBM tried the same trick in the 1970s and 80s. It nearly destroyed them when the playing-field shifted away from mainframes. It did destroy companies like Prime. Acorn tried the same stunt in the microcomputer field. They lasted a bit longer than the giants, but they're now only producing televisions, their PC division abandoned in the dirt.

      Oracle will, eventually, fall the same way if they rely on destroying competition and propping up their brand name with buy-outs. The question is how much damage they will inflict on the markets in the meantime.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Peoplesoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone want Peoplesoft?

      For their customer base.
      Oracle and Peoplesoft combined with Sun hardware is a natural in the ERP area.
      Add in their other aquisitions and they cover a huge chunk of enterprise requirements.

      No arguing with other vendors. Oracle can supply everything needed and solve problems between products internally.
      That's good business.

    4. Re:Peoplesoft by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the arguing step is where customers get concessions and realistic pricing. A single vendor solution means no fruitful arguing from the time the contract is signed until the customer is ready to threaten to endure migration costs required for divorcing the offerings.

  14. What is this costing the taxpayer? by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "SAP has offered to pay $40 million for the damage it caused and an additional $120 million to cover Oracle's legal bill."

    But who pays the salary of the judge and other court personnel? The courthouse building isn't free and neither are its utilities. This can't be cheap.

    1. Re:What is this costing the taxpayer? by iammani · · Score: 2, Informative

      Duh, they (both parties) of course paid court fees.

    2. Re:What is this costing the taxpayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Court filing fees in the US are generally a few tens to hundreds of dollars per case; fees for copies of documents are perhaps 50 cents per page at the most; and fees for transcripts, which can be more than a dollar per page often (or perhaps generally) don't go to the court but to an independent company. They may deter some completely silly lawsuits, but do not defray the cost of having court personnel process documents for, hear, deliberate about, and write about a complicated case. (Of course, the litigants themselves often pay significant taxes over the years which properly cover, among other things, having courts available to address legal problems that may arise.)

    3. Re:What is this costing the taxpayer? by knarf · · Score: 1

      Of course, the litigants themselves often pay significant taxes over the years

      You'd be surprised how little taxes these litigants actually pay. The bigger they get, the more they seem to get away with paying essentially no taxes - or even end up being subsidised in various ways. Their employees pay taxes, sure, but that is not the same really - were it not for these companies those people would be employed elsewhere and pay taxes on whatever they make.
      These is a lot of information to be found on the 'net about this phenomenon, just head for your favourite search thing and have a look. Search for '[company] tax dodge' for some examples.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  15. See this book by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
    The Art of Power by Thich Nhat Hanh. Anyway, Hanh talks about a billionaire (no name given) that came to Plumb Village and how he has a body guard because he's always afraid of being attacked or kidnapped, thinks everyone who's nice to him just wants to know him for his money, he has to work constantly and little time for loved ones, he has a huge amount of pressure, and there's some other things that I don't remember. You start thinking twice about being a billionaire and I didn't get the impression that this guy was a narcissist - I'm not saying that the folks you mentioned are not, but all billionaires are not and I think many would prefer to be anonymous if they could. I know I would but it's impossible with that much money. There was a billionaire by the name of Danial K. Ludwig (shipping) that was a recluse but folks knew who he was.

    Ellison? I don't know him and never met him. But it has been published that he's a womanizer, likes his jet fighters, race cars, yachts, etc... which seems to support your premise.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:See this book by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      If you liked "The Art of War" then you'll love "What's the Difference betwee God and Larry Ellison" by Michael Lewis. The answer, of course, is obvious: God knows he's not Larry Ellison.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:See this book by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Ellison has been known to keep a copy of a certain biography of Genghis Khan on or near the desk in his office. It is also said that he is an admirer of the Sun Tzu and the Art of War.

    3. Re:See this book by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So do a million geeks let alone people with a military background that can actually visualise what it means. It's effectively Machiavelli for Americans.

    4. Re:See this book by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      The Prince was brilliant.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    5. Re:See this book by flosofl · · Score: 1

      It was also satire. This becomes pretty obvious when you read his other writings. Michiavelli was an inveterate republican. Not the political party, the style of government.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    6. Re:See this book by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      "Business is war," as one founder of an early computer company used to say.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    7. Re:See this book by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      That explains why it was in the fiction section. I just thought it was in the wrong section.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  16. [OT, sorry.] On doofus web surfers. by tqk · · Score: 1

    On /., asking how to find info (http://slashdot.org/help) on a website; "Brillant" [sic]. Their current user docs list mysql, but it's dated 2000.

    Oh, and while I'm at it, that jerk who posted a complete ripoff of a BOFH http://www.theregister.co.uk/ article on with no attribution ought to be strung up by his earbeads (in comments on "Toy Robots Can Guard Your Home"; I was moderating so couldn't complain inthread).

    Sigh, fsck. Carry on you shallow posters.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  17. Many databases in the pond by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would recommend Ingres (which is GPL) for the Data Warehouse environments, PostgreSQL for the mid-sized relational databases and Drizzle for the small-scale systems. (DO NOT support MySql as it is now an Oracle product -- support one of the official forks.)

    Likewise, I would recommend using Libre Office (as soon as it hits a major release) over and above Oracle's OpenOffice.

    For Java, I would recommend using IBM's JVM where possible (it's largely Oracle's but getting it from IBM will still kick dirt in Oracle's eyes). Where you're running a standalone Java application that can be compiled using GCJ, eliminate the JVM entirely and go native.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Many databases in the pond by xtracto · · Score: 1

      So... what would you suggest for a very small startup company that wants to setup a simple web site with PHP and simple database...

      Last time I looked at the market, all the cheap'n'good' hosting providers were offering only MySQL database...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Many databases in the pond by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Roll your own?
      You should be able to get a LAPP (Linux, Apache, PostgreSQL, PHP) server up and running quite quickly.

      Tutorials can be found on howtoforge.

      Also a hosting provider can be convinced to use PostgreSQL. Just tell them you will take your buisiness elsewhere if not.
      (Also ask about the MySQL licensing terms. They are kinda complicated. F.i. if you host something on your server. NP, but if you give it to a customer, you have to pay. Dunno how hosting providers fit in there, but it could scare them enough)

    3. Re:Many databases in the pond by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      I agree and also thanks for the info.

      But ultimately we need a replacement for Java. And that in turn means we need replacements for all the Tomcats, JBosses, Springs, Hibernates and whatnot.

      I have personally been looking into Vala for some time now.

      Any other suggestions?

    4. Re:Many databases in the pond by jd · · Score: 1

      Drizzle is a fork of MySQL from before it was Oracle-ified. It is therefore 100% compatible with anything actually in use for MySQL. However, it is lighter-weight and therefore faster. As such, it is ideal for a simple web site with PHP.

      PostgreSQL is heaftier and if you need the extra functions is definitely superior to MySQL's attempts to add in all the extra features. PostgreSQL 9.x series has some amazing capabilities.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Many databases in the pond by jd · · Score: 1

      We don't necessarily need to replace Tomcat, JBoss, etc, we merely need to be able to handle the ABI they expect -and- be able to run them without a virtual machine (ie: compile them to native form).

      Ok, correction. We don't need to replace them - yet. If we use an intermediate step or two, where these existing tools are gradually moved onto a different language or replacements are developed, then the migration will be much less painful and much more likely to actually happen.

      I like D. Mind you, I like lots of languages. :) Seriously, D would be the "obvious" choice as it would mean the lowest learning curve for developers and the greatest amount of directly translatable code.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Many databases in the pond by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      Java is irrelevant compared to the JVM. All the cool powers that Java has are coded in to the JVM with some incredibly impressive run times. As a Java programmer I consider the language it self ugly but the JVM magic.

    7. Re:Many databases in the pond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drizzle for the small-scale systems.

      Really? Their FAQ says

      Can I run a website with this?
      No. We are still making incompatible changes, and certainly do not believe the code is production quality. Right now we are defaulting many configure operations to generate debugging code for us so our binaries are not optimal.

      support one of the official forks.

      official fork sounds paradoxical. What should we call a fork whose only reason for being is to keep something free? Let's call it a frork. Or in the case of Maria and L'Office, a frorakle.

  18. Knitting by CaroKann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All HP has to do is focus on their knitting. Make great products and take great care of your customers. You don't need lots of sound-and-fury drama to be a great company

  19. Alternate bests from Genghis Cohen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hot water, good dentistry, and soft lavatory paper.

  20. I'm becoming more and more convinced by twoears · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Larry Ellison is becoming more of a software terrorist every day.

  21. Oracle is what Oracle has always been by Chitlenz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was a DBA forever, and while I loved the 10 or so years I spent supporting Oracle I noted that consultants (for what its worth) seemed to uniformly hate the place (a note, I supported Peoplesoft Installations for awhile and we saw a lot of consultants come through from Oracle among other places..).

    It's really a shame, but when 9 came out and Oracle co-opted java for the first time, they screwed it up and it hasn't really gotten any better since. I think a big reason for this is that the office culture of the place is a reflection of Ellison's arrogance, which is somewhat demotivating (even if only privately) to the people who work there, and their products suffer. So here we are with Oracle now owning java and, surprise surprise, Ellison is out to monetize it. Folks, that's what he does. There's a reason he's one of the richest men alive, he finds choke points in the software market and either buys or kills (and replaces) them.

    He reminds me of the Wall Street people who see no moral issues with destroying everything in their path to turn a profit. It's sick, it's wrong, and this is America where for better or worse its legal. Ultimately, these super-arrogant folks will be the death of software as an industry because they simply have no concept of 'enough'. One guy told us (unconfirmed personally, but I have no reason to doubt it) that at Oracle, if you weren't in a position to replace your boss after the first year, your career there was basically over. Ellison calls this 'samurai management' or some such nonsense, but I call it bad business. It's this kind of crap that leads to workplace incivility, and this grudge-holding shit Emperor Larry is famous for is plain old simple hubris. It's ok though, he's getting too old to do it for much longer, and Oracle is rapidly becoming a product worth 1k$ instead of 100k$ per installation. Not that he'll ever be poor, but boy wouldn't it be fun to watch him be humbled.

    --
    Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
    1. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by hardboiled.tequila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One guy told us (unconfirmed personally, but I have no reason to doubt it) that at Oracle, if you weren't in a position to replace your boss after the first year, your career there was basically over. Ellison calls this 'samurai management' or some such nonsense, but I call it bad business.

      I'd call it "Sith Management".

    2. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by yuhong · · Score: 1

      So here we are with Oracle now owning java and, surprise surprise, Ellison is out to monetize it.

      Jrockit has existed for years, since they acquired BEA.

    3. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One guy told us (unconfirmed personally, but I have no reason to doubt it) that at Oracle, if you weren't in a position to replace your boss after the first year, your career there was basically over. Ellison calls this 'samurai management' or some such nonsense, but I call it bad business.

      Posting as AC since I don't want my workplace and id to be linked.
      The above statement is rubbish. I work at Oracle, and its not always great - but its not too bad either. There is a lot of pressure, but you just need to know how to handle it, or push it back if necessary. Nothing any other workplace won't expose employees to.

    4. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the rumors true that developers at Oracle have to use some sort of hosted development environment running in a remote datacenter with awful latencies, along with an arcane revison control system?

    5. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by Chitlenz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a lot of pressure, but you just need to know how to handle it, or push it back if necessary

      You are welcome to defend your employer, and at Oracle I don't blame you for using AC to do it, but this is not exactly an observation I came up with out of the blue sky...

      I'll just leave this here for you bud.

      http://news.cnet.com/The-pitch-Inside-the-pressure-cooker/2009-1017_3-897414.html

      Please understand, I think Oracle is a great product at its core. It almost literally runs the world at this point, I just question from both public articles (such as linked) and personal experience (15 years as a DBA, architect, developer, and now Development Officer) Oracle's tactics. Even if they were the greatest employer EVER, it still wouldn't excuse they way they treat their customers. They routinely overcharge for services and pad consulting gigs.

      I've been deposed by Oracle in court before (as part of a PS lawsuit), and watching them treat their customers like dogs speaks volumes. I refuse to believe anyone with the kind of sleazy ethics I watched performed (on more than one occasion I might add) can somehow magically be paradigms of humanity internally. On one particularly memorable occasion, I watched Peoplesoft almost destroy a company by trying to implement a beta version of a SQL Server based product(before Oracle bought them), and then got to watch Oracle (via the courts, after the PS buyout) trying to defend Microsoft as a perfectly viable platform. These weren't lawyers,by the way. When it's 25M$ or so of trainwreck, you get real life VP's to show up and lie.

      --
      Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
    6. Re:Oracle is what Oracle has always been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just say "Shit Management?"

  22. Not a winning strategy by scurvyj · · Score: 0

    Lets face it, Java is dead (it is, really), and Postgres is not only faster than MySQL but safer with very large datasets.

    Also, this is not a gearing up for further war. On the contrary, this will damage Oracle. They will spend a huge amount of money, and the other players will have very little trouble stringing them along forever in the courts, BHP/Microsoft style. It will also exhaust key players inside the company that will get jack of the giant amount of stress this is doubtless causing internally. And as an aside: it will piss off lots of developers.
    All HP has to do is bide its time, build its resources, and then strike a weakened Oracle like Michael Ironside dispatching Louis Del Grande in Scanners.

    Kaboom (Splat).

    1. Re:Not a winning strategy by codepunk · · Score: 1

      I really need to run a new version of postgresql to figure out if you are jerking my chain or not. I ran postgres databases for years in production and they always sucked. Twice or three times the babysitting of any mysql database. I remember all to well having to take them offline once a week to run vacuum on them to keep them from falling over. Great database with great capability but the maintenance was painful.

      --


      Got Code?
    2. Re:Not a winning strategy by mr_bubb · · Score: 0

      Completely disagree. We run very large pg databases and the maintenance is minimal. Mysql is such an inferior product. As for Java, I don't care about the language per se, but there's a lot of good things written for the JVM that I would hate to see disappear. Can't IBM just put their balls to the wall and take over development of OpenJDK? They produced a great JIT long before Sun got around to it; they have the capability...

  23. Re:[OT, sorry.] On doofus web surfers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually asshole, it was only part of the BOFH article. I would have thought most people who came here would know where it came from. You obviously did. So go fuck yourself.

  24. Or... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Ellison demonstrated the love of combat and confrontation ...

    ... Larry could just be a dick.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  25. Not at all by xdor · · Score: 1

    America and capitalism are providing you choices: buy something or from someone else.

  26. Maybe they really just want better parking? by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

    I find this lawsuit particulary funny simply because their offices in Burlington, MA, are next to each other on the same street, Van De Graaff Drive, which is basically just the driveway for those buildings. You easily hit a golfball from one to the other. I wonder if they make dirty faces at each other? (Sun's up a different road, at least a half-dozen par 5's away.)

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
  27. Re:[OT, sorry.] On doofus web surfers. by tqk · · Score: 1

    Actually asshole, it was only part of the BOFH article.

    Ah, an excellent riposte, sir. So, you only ripped them off for half of their article, and couldn't be bothered to educate the unwashed masses as to where you stole it from. I stand corrected.

    I'm saying you're just freaking lazy, and ought to do better in the future. You're not damned for all time. Just get it right. Constructive criticsm?

    Nice work with the A-word there. I think you've got that down.

    Idiot.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  28. I wish Larry the best, but by mr_bubb · · Score: 0

    Couldn't he somehow get marooned on a desert island for five years, a la "Castaway"? And then when he came back, he wouldn't be such a prick? Maybe?

  29. Pretty Simple by lotho+brandybuck · · Score: 1
    Ellison is an asshole, and Apothecker/HP are sissies.

    What I really don't understand is if you're running a a database company, do you really want to trumpet how lousy your internal security is in federal court?

    1. Re:Pretty Simple by BadDoggie · · Score: 1
      It wasn't lousy internal security, it was a company violating all terms on a server which is open to the public, which also got its customers to act illegally for it, scraping the content servers for documents, patches and updates which they would then diff and repackage as their own updates. And SAP knew that's what TomorrowNow was doing when they bought them.

      The difference between what TomorrowNow did with Siebel software and what Larry did with Red Hat Linux is that RHEL is open; Siebel doesn't have a line of FOSS code in it.

  30. "Merucry ": Taco typo by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    "Chris O'Brien writes in the Merucry News"...

    I see Taco is keeping his usual high editorial standards.

    After all these years he still can't spellcheck? Christ, in my browser it's underlined in red.

  31. Oracle was not a gift by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    And nobody gave it to Mr. Ellison. He did what he felt he had to do and still does. I doubt if any other way would have yielded better results.

  32. 356 days to Halloween---Silver Shamrock by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    Shiz! What a write up. I'm quivering in my jump boots. Too bad Halloween already passed. Michael Myers versus Lawrence Ellison, a blockbuster in the making.

  33. What would he do if not philanthropy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that Gates gives money because, if he didn't, he and his wife would be bored. I've never seen anything that would indicate kindness or warmth or friendliness in Bill Gates.

    1. Re:What would he do if not philanthropy? by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      I agree. My guess is that in his eyes he won the game. He made more money then anyone else in the world. There was other option then to start playing a different game, "Save the world". Thank god it was not "Rule the world". He has a shit-ton of money, he could have made some real damage before he would have gotten stopped.

  34. Power tends to corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men. (Lord Acton)

    Not that I would call Ellison "great". He's just an deranged bully with a distended ego.

    Another take on the first idea is of course "Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it" (Pitt the Elder).

    I think its best if we just consign all the products Oracle control to the dustbin of technological history and move on.

  35. Then don't characterize them by the money they mad by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    made. That is a side effect of creating a great business. All three created. Better yet, they created something that other people wanted. They influence millions through their work and some of them through their charity (see Gates, not so much the other two). To say they did not have influence in your life is absurd. Granted it is not on the level of your parents but all three influenced industry. All three pushed forward this business many of us work in.

    I would be that many of their problems are not as bad as many make it out to be. It is common for people to tear down others, assign them issues, all to justify our position in life relative to theirs. somehow it make us feel better than people in higher positions somehow are defective or bear burdens we can claim to not want. Frankly, I would be happy to have created something even 1% of the people they influenced liked. People like the three you mention didn't get there without sacrifice, the difference between them and many of you/us is that they realized that getting there isn't done with 40 hour a week jobs and bitching on message boards.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  36. Re:Acorn by stiggle · · Score: 1

    I thought Acorn did rather well.
    They developed a CPU for their Archimedes PC and then licensed the design to everyone who wanted it.
    Even Intel license Acorns CPU design they did that well.

    Your iPod as a little tiny Acorn CPU inside it.

    ARM - originally stood for Acorn Risc Machine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture

  37. Even Steve Jobs by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    would say: "Wow, Larry Ellison is a real a-hole".

  38. Please mod parent up by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    This is one of, if not the most, informative posts that I've read on the subject. I burned up my mod points yesterday, unfortunately. :(

  39. Re:Acorn by jd · · Score: 1

    They did brilliantly for a while - but at some point they stagnated and abandoned ARM, followed by the Acorn PC (which was never finished).

    RiscOS was infinitely superior to any other GUI of the time, but failed to keep pace. For whatever reason, Acorn became too insular.

    When they did finally abandon their entire IT division, a breakaway group tried to continue to develop the Acorn PC. I don't know what happened there, but suspect Acorn got stubborn, given the press releases of the time from them.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  40. Evil is as evil does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I worked at Peoplesoft during the hostile takeover. It was brutal and devastating. For me, Peoplesoft was the best job I ever had. There was excellent compensation and more importantly esprit d corps. It was the happiest place I have ever been. I truly enjoyed going to work every day. I did the best work of my career there. The group I worked with had their stuff together, we were incredibly productive. The internal BBS, was a great resource for all things from tech support to Giants tickets. Yesterday I was travelling from SF through Pleasanton on 580. I passed HQG and was overcome by sadness. I fucking hate Oracle and Larry Ellison.

  41. And the funniest thing of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the funniest thing of all was that all these decades, the FOSSies and MS haters whined that Bill Gates was the "most evil person" in computing.

    Now the reality is shown to not only be far from their claims, but they were actually being used as tools by one of the most evil people in computing!