Slashdot Mirror


Court Returns Stolen Stargate MMO To Founder

An anonymous reader writes "A Maricopa County Superior Court judge has ended a bitter dispute over control of a Mesa video game company's assets, effectively giving the online combat game Stargate Resistance and the long-delayed MMORPG Stargate Worlds back to Cheyenne Mountain Entertainment. Fresh Start tried to remove all of Cheyenne Mountain's assets from its offices on Feb. 24, but was prevented from doing so when the police arrived. Networking cords had been cut and left to hang loose, and PC cases were empty shells that had been gutted of components such as hard drives. But time may finally have run out for Worlds, Cheyenne Mountain's signature project: The ruling comes as MGM Studios has apparently terminated the license it granted in 2006 for the Arizona company to produce video games based on the Stargate movies and TV shows."

128 comments

  1. Damn... by Kokuyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My friend will be very sad today.

    1. Re:Damn... by dintech · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why, did his cat die?

    2. Re:Damn... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      He's a total Stargate Geek. For him, this whole thing was like an epic drama.

    3. Re:Damn... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why, did his cat die?

      Yes. Didn't you read the summary: "Networking cords had been cut and left to hang...".

      All that cat5... sad, really.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Damn... by supertrinko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eli? Yes, he did play a lot of that MMO.

      --
      If it rhymes it must be true.
    5. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That was footage from this very MMO in the first episode of SGU by the way. They actually wrote something that resembled a game before imploding.

    6. Re:Damn... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      Yup, I was in the beta.... ...the video was SWG'ish...the play was abhorrent, and the interface was klugey

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    7. Re:Damn... by DQKennard · · Score: 1

      If I ever get a cat, I must name him "five".

  2. How they managed to hide the sabotage by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    They simply claimed that the gutted computers had all been upgraded to Vista. To the casual observer there is very little difference between an empty case and a computer running Vista.

    1. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They simply claimed that the gutted computers had all been upgraded to Vista. To the casual observer there is very little difference between an empty case and a computer running Vista.

      Wrong. The empty case is much less annoying!

    2. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      They simply claimed that the gutted computers had all been upgraded to Vista. To the casual observer there is very little difference between an empty case and a computer running Vista.

      Wrong. The empty case is much less annoying!

      and slightly more functional

    3. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's a good one! Do you have any jokes about Daikatana?

    4. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by XLazarusX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Love the ironic juxtaposition of your post and sig.

    5. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/casual observer/average user/
      s/Vista/Linux

      Actually, the really funny part is that you probably thought your post was somehow funny. I have to agree with the other reply, the irony of combining your post and your sig is just amazing.

    6. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      They should have left the network cards inside and claimed they were dumb terminals.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Locke2005 · · Score: 0, Troll

      But us computer professionals know there is a very big difference between an empty case and a computer running Vista: the empty case is far more secure!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      I was going to chide you fore being yet another windows basher on slashdot. But then I realized you were bashing Vista.

    9. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like air-gap security to me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      Please ignore the man behind the curtain...

    11. Re:How they managed to hide the sabotage by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Troll

      See, Linux is an OS for grown ups, not a toy like Windows. When grown ups need to do big boy work they use an OS that doesn't get hacked constantly, that is stable, that doesn't have to phone home for permission to operate, that comes out of the box with real tools like NFS and SSH, that doesn't have the worlds worst CLI, that has a secure, stable kernel. But yeah, you just keep on playing with your little toy and pretend it's a big boy OS.

  3. Misread the headline by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Funny

    At first I thought the court had returned a stolen Stargate, not a stolen Stargate *MMO*. Which would have been much bigger news, that's for sure.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Misread the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 6.7 Metres (Diameter) bigger news indeed.

    2. Re:Misread the headline by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      At first I thought the court had returned a stolen Stargate, not a stolen Stargate *MMO*. Which would have been much bigger news, that's for sure.

      They must have set a transponder on it and beamed it up.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Misread the headline by meerling · · Score: 1

      not really, who said it had to be functional, though movie/tv props can bring a lot at auctions.

    4. Re:Misread the headline by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi is worthy of historical landmarks or monuments. Too bad that Arizona gaming company couldn't do a big promotion, like putting a full-sized Stargate by the end of the London Bridge. Of course the remote wilderness of Lake Powell to the north feels ideal, as much like another planet as any place on Earth. A Stargate would look great out by Rainbow Bridge, an amazing natural arch.

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Lake_powell

      Someone filthy rich should build a town somewhere with different sections that are all built from various sci-fi constructs. Turn it into a cool town, playground, resort, school, or campus for some hot new startup?
      Steve: sell that MS stock and do something fun while giving geeks and other jobs

      (wondering when the next season of Eureka starts...)

  4. So stealing does pay. by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not sure what Fresh Start Software's motive was, but if it was to block development of a Stargate videogame, they achieved their goal.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:So stealing does pay. by Compholio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure what Fresh Start Software's motive was, but if it was to block development of a Stargate videogame, they achieved their goal.

      If one of the quotes from TFA is to be believed then my hypothesis would be that they are offended by Stargate's treatment of religion:

      Whiting then expressed optimism that Dark Comet would end up returning Cheyenne Mountain’s assets to him. He compared his situation in the “hostile takeover” to that of Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark in the first Iron Man movie, but said the motives for it were personal and even religious.

    2. Re:So stealing does pay. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Stargate video game? No, no, no! It is a FARGATE!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    3. Re:So stealing does pay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked for the company that Cheyenne Mountain originally licensed the engine for Stargate Worlds from. It seems that the farcical idiocy in that company went from the bottom to top, anyone with a shred of intelligence was judged as a threat and hastily fired. Any communication with that company started with us being blamed for their basic inability to design, manage or implement a computer game and any advice they were given was ignored. They eventually switched to Unreal, but unsurprisingly, they screwed that up too and blamed others for that also. In my experience, the founder of such companies is usually responsible for creating such a unproductive culture and that Whiting guy's comments ("I’m the brains behind this company. I’m the creative guy behind this company.") seem to confirm the image I had of a man devoid of any leadership ability or situational awareness. I have worked with arrogant old idiots who are full of "great ideas" and manage to get investment to make a computer game without knowing the slightest thing about the structure of a project or the people needed to complete it. I applaud "Fresh Start" software in its quest to turn that crippled pony into glue, as liquidation is the best thing for it. If you knew anything about the state of the project, you will know exactly why they did it, probably the only way to get their paychecks from the last few months.

    4. Re:So stealing does pay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as the license has expired and now they cannot realistically release this game, it sounds like a clear case of irreparable harm.

    5. Re:So stealing does pay. by digitig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If one of the quotes from TFA is to be believed then my hypothesis would be that they are offended by Stargate's treatment of religion:

      Whiting then expressed optimism that Dark Comet would end up returning Cheyenne Mountain’s assets to him. He compared his situation in the “hostile takeover” to that of Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark in the first Iron Man movie, but said the motives for it were personal and even religious.

      In this field, that could be anything from which operating system they were using to which version of a storyline is canonical.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    6. Re:So stealing does pay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I applaud "Fresh Start" software in its quest to turn that crippled pony into glue, as liquidation is the best thing for it. If you knew anything about the state of the project, you will know exactly why they did it, probably the only way to get their paychecks from the last few months.

      You can't take someone's property just because they were managing it incompetently.

    7. Re:So stealing does pay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Fargate, Wormhole X-Treme!

    8. Re:So stealing does pay. by Cyberblah · · Score: 1

      No. There were allegations about Mr. Whiting that were made when things were getting rancorous. He's probably referring to those. Even if they were true, the people working for Cheyenne and who went on to form Fresh Start had much better reasons to leave long ago.

      I know one engineer on the project who was a devote Christian and expressed some reservations about Stargate's idea of Ascension, but he acted sanely and left soon after they stopped paying him.

    9. Re:So stealing does pay. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Wormhole! Extreme!

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:So stealing does pay. by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Which in some cases is a damn shame.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  5. Crossover by zounds011 · · Score: 1

    My first thought: What could the Founders possibly have to do with a Stargate?

    Then the parsing agent caught up. What a disappointment.

    1. Re:Crossover by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Actually it was never disclosed but I believe the ring around DS9 was...in fact...A stargate. Sisko just never had Daniel Jackson to identify the last chevron. That and they already had a bad taste in their mouth from the things that came out of that darned wormhole.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Crossover by meerling · · Score: 4, Informative

      DS9 was based on an earlier script for Babylon 5. You can google the lawsuits but let's put it this way, Paramount lost the lawsuit so badly they had it sealed and were forced to show B5 trailers at Star Trek conventions. If you have any idea how anti anything not paramount those guys are, you know they got pounded flat by the judge.

      (The version of B5 they had their hands on even had a shapeshifting security officer... )

    3. Re:Crossover by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge B5 fan and was solidly against DS9 for their blatant plagiarism back in the day, but I'm going to have to ask for serious citation about the lawsuit Paramount supposedly lost and had sealed (!?) and showing B5 trailers at Trek conventions.

      My memory is fuzzy after a decade so I've tried googling for this, but the closest I got was J. Michael Straczynski (B5's creator) quoted as declining to have Paramount sued, as it would draw too much attention and resources away from producing B5.

  6. I mourn the loss by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Star Trek was awesome in its day. Some will say that it still is. But what it had was not just a vision of the future, but a hope for the future. Star Wars gave us a new way look at things as well, but I can't say that it offered much more than intense entertainment. Stargate sought to engage the mind by tying old mysteries with new ones creating a galaxy and even a universe of awe and wonder that continued to expand beyond limits that were not imagined previously. Very few other sci-fi themes contained the qualities contained within Star Trek, Star Wars, Battle Star Galactica, Firefly and others, but Stargate, while it did seem to run its course, maintained those qualities in intense amounts. Had greed, politics and myopia had not taken its destructive toll, the potential of Stargate could have set a new standard for the genre.

    I mourn the loss... but it was lost long ago. We're just seeing the aftermath of some really crappy people.

    1. Re:I mourn the loss by g4b · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very few other sci-fi themes contained the qualities contained within Star Trek, Star Wars, Babylon5, Firefly and others,

      fixed that for you.

    2. Re:I mourn the loss by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

      Yes, Star Trek brought to us a vision of the future wherein no matter where one roams in the universe, 1) Everybody looks human, 2) Everybody speaks perfect English, despite never having been contacted before by humans, and 3) Sex with alien species is considered perfectly natural. All I can say is... Ewwwwwwwww!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:I mourn the loss by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Star Trek:TNG is still my favorite sci-fi series, I watch whenever I notice it's on BBCA or Syfy.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:I mourn the loss by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Yes, Star Trek brought to us a vision of the future wherein no matter where one roams in the universe, 1) Everybody looks human, 2) Everybody speaks perfect English, despite never having been contacted before by humans, and 3) Sex with alien species is considered perfectly natural. All I can say is... Ewwwwwwwww!

      And Stargate (SG1 anyway) was different how?

      Trek:

      1)They sort of handwaved this with The Chase, but in most cases it was just hat/nose of the week.

      2)U.T., though that doesn't excuse it working right away.

      3)Why not?

      Stargate:

      1)Frankly panspermia seems more likely than humans evolving independently twice.

      2)No excuse at all, but it could be argued that subject races would probably speak the Goa'uld tongue.

      3)Most of the aliens are either non-humanoid or genderless so this doesn't really apply.

      They're both TV shows with limited budgets (makeup), sex sells and watching a bunch of people learn each other's language wouldn't make good TV.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:I mourn the loss by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      1) Explained in TNG that a single humanoid race had "seeded" the galaxy with its likeness IIRC.
      2) Universal translator, duh. Have you even seen the shows?
      3) Isn't that just racism (speciesism?) on your part? Since, as you have already observed, the aliens are almost all physiologically similar to humans.

    6. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stargate blew. All of its plots refer to ancient structures and cultures, saying "aliens did it". When one gets old and tired, they get out a new culture, and label it with "aliens did it," and move on, as if they've done something clever. And the things they refer to? They aren't "mysteries." We know who built the pyramids, and why, and when, and largely how.

      What it was was bland, generic scifi fit for mass consumption. It lacked the campy retro appeal of the original run of Star Trek, lacked the talented writers of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and lacked the production values of Battlestar Galactica.

      They tried, too little, too late, to stop hemorrhaging viewers, by adding continuity, villains that looked like Twilight rejects, and lots and lots of big, but generally poorly executed space battles, but it was too little, too late. They managed two spinoffs. One was the same crap recycled, except set in a new location. The other was quite different from the rest of the series, which some might call "ballsy" or "daring", but those people would be idiots. Stargate: Universe is trying very hard to be Battlestar Galactica, but isn't quite managing it.

      To sum up, a quote attributed (probably falsely) to Samuel Johnson, "It is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good."

    7. Re:I mourn the loss by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Very few other sci-fi themes contained the qualities contained within Raumpatrouille, Star Trek, Star Wars, Babylon5, Firefly and others,

      fixed that for you

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    8. Re:I mourn the loss by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Had greed, politics and myopia had not taken its destructive toll, the potential of Stargate could have set a new standard for the genre.

      I can't speak to the "greed and greed", but Stargate did set a "new standard" for the genre, to some degree. The show ran for a decade with (mostly) the same cast throughout. They were able to sustain essentially the same format for that entire time, without degrading the quality too substantially, and introduce new content throughout.

      Granted, this only really works with episodic fiction, but they still managed to maintain a degree of continuity and character progression from season to season (and episode to episode). Contrast that to ST:TNG, where by the 3rd or so season, things were starting to get a bit dull and repetitive.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:I mourn the loss by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      You wonder why the aliens looked human and spoke English?
      Come on, think of the process:
      You go to the casting call, read for the part.....
      How many ugly non English speakers would make it past that?
      As for the sex, well, some aliens will do anything to get on stage.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    10. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (posting anon as I already modded)

      FWIW B5 was the first science fiction show to have any kind of scientific realism when it comes to space battles, not to mention the fact that not all races had artifical gravity, hence the rotating station/ships. As for the story, B5 is about the only TV show to date, no matter what genre, with a well defined plot beforehand. The beginning, middle and end were all written before a single episode was filmed - due to issues with networks though, the fourth season feels very rushed, and the first half of the fifth is quite irrelevant. There are great episodes on the latter half though, Fall of Centauri Prime is one of my favourites of all seasons.

      Compare this to the re-imagined BSG, where the Cylons might have had a plan, but it became very evident they weren't letting the writers in on it. After what was the lamest and literally the most deux ex machina ending ever that was the final episode I didn't think I could ever be as infuriated after watching a show (well, Lost proved me wrong, but I digress).

      I'll grant that B5 certainly looks dated, and some of the acting is less than stellar (G'kar and Londo make totally up for it though in my opinion), but it certainly has been a much more influential series than BSG ever will, in promoting the whole "series as an arc"-concept beyond the realm of soap operas. BSG's contribution seems to be "despite a big budget, we can't afford camera stands".

    11. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, forgot to add, no level of scientific realism? Where's the BSG equivalent?

    12. Re:I mourn the loss by g4b · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, opinions stay opinions.
      Don't get me wrong, I am a very open person, but reading BSG next to the other (really great) shows made me shiver.

      You are right, some actors were very bad in B5 - but some were genius (Katsulas, e.g.).
      Well this mostly also has to do with budget.

      Also, the storyarcs of B5 are still one of the best writings (in terms of WRITING) for any space opera, creating a very epic feeling until the show unfolds into season 5. Many things could have been done better, but we can tell that about every sci-fi show. I do not talk about Crusader or most of the silly movies.

      It was an experiment to slightly plan forward 5 Seasons of story and holding that promise, unveiling things which were planted seasons before. Some things of course did not work without some patchwork, like the unexpected change of captains and their meaning being "the one" in season 2/3.
      You do not have this in DS9 until S3. (I love both shows)

      To the question, which came first: It is very likely that Paramount used Straczynski's ideas to influence or even develop DS9 (since they had his first 22 episodes as writing already in '89), however Straczynski never wanted to sue them. You can read about that on wikipedia.

      Scientific ideas about how ships, stations, weapons, governments and societies work were very well made in B5. The choice to focus on 4 races was a good one. Of course, it was heavily LotR influenced storytelling, but it worked out.

      BSG on the other hand was sometimes terrible to watch - too much obvious but claiming-to-be-very-philosophical dialogues (the philosophical questions thrown up in a sci-fi-show should be between the lines), too much new age hypertheories, terrible nausea while watching space scenes, and again only a few actors were good - however none were as terrible as some in B5, I must admit.

      BSG deserves its credit to be a fine show. But it does not deserve to stand beside Firefly, Star Trek or Star Wars at all. B5 in my opinion does.
      I would add it to the second bestest, where Stargate Atlantis, Farscape, Earth2 and so on can be found.

      Well and there is Andromeda. We can agree about that one, I hope.

    13. Re:I mourn the loss by Kabloink · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, admit it. You watched BSG for the boobs.

      --
      "Thbbft!" - Bill the Cat
    14. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other was quite different from the rest of the series, which some might call "ballsy" or "daring", but those people would be idiots. Stargate: Universe is trying very hard to be Battlestar Galactica, but isn't quite managing it.

      Eh, SGU is consistently better than most of BSG. BSG is half filler. Who cares about Tom Zarek? Nobody, and yet they focus on him for something like 8 episodes. The show lost steam after some of the Cylons made a truce with the humans. The "Final Five" idea was good, until you find out that their mission was to

      1. Infiltrate the military
      2. ?
      3. Profit

      I watched it and liked it, but it has glaring problems.

    15. Re:I mourn the loss by slapout · · Score: 1

      BSG was a soap opera -- just with people wearing space costumes. When B5 was over I felt that I had watched the characters grow over the last five years. BSG gave me characters that I couldn't care for.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    16. Re:I mourn the loss by powerlord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally, the series that tried the "hardest" on aliens being alien was Farscape.

      Farscape:

      1) Bi-pedal humanoid seemed common, but a) the makeup for those bipedal humanoids sometimes got rather intense. b) they weren't always humanoid (Pilot for instance) and c) motivations weren't always similar (just 'cause it looked mostly "human" didn't mean it was, and vice-versa). (well, and d) explaining why the most human aliens DID look that way, and that was part of the plot ... but we had to wait for the movie to fill in the last season of story).

      2) They explained it away in Episode 1 (think Babel-Fish), and even came back to the idea a few times (with 'us' the audience seeing how things sounded "naturally").

      3) Sex is one thing, procreation is another.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    17. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this is all subjective/opinion anyway, I'll add mine.

      Babylon 5 was crap.

      I liked the setting and the overall plot, but some of the characters were just so corny and ridiculous that I couldn't stand them (John Sheridan especially). Not to mention that in the final season the whole story basically ended and then they dragged out the series for more episodes.

      But that's just how I felt about it. To each their own :)

    18. Re:I mourn the loss by IronChef · · Score: 1

      What I liked a lot about Stargate SG-1 (and really the whole franchise) is that it showed Earth growing from the pre-spaceflight era into a major power. Along the way, we even learned to cooperate among ourselves. The Stargate program became an international effort. It was a like a Roddenberry hope for the future... but with more action. :)

      In the very first episode, the Stargate is a forgotten relic under a tarp in a military facility... by the last episode Earth forces are fighting off alien demigods in ships we built ourselves.

      Lots of other SF shows have had good, long story arcs but I think Stargate is unique in showing so much "future history" unfolding. I really miss it.

    19. Re:I mourn the loss by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As all good science fiction does, current events and the human condition were examined, placing the characters in moral quandaries throughout the show.

      No, all good science fiction does not examine current events, the human condition, or moral quandaries. In fact I'd be thankful if less scifi writers felt the need to do so, especially since most of them aren't very good at it and even those who are tend to let the requirements of such examinations dictate the plot and the setting.

      I'd much rather see more examinations of possible futures and advanced super-tech.

      Religion, origins, etc. were explored while maintaining a reasonable level of scientific realism. Significantly, B5 had none of these things.

      Well, not much anyway, and that was its best feature. The parts that did examine them tended to be cringeworthy, just like they usually are anywhere.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re:I mourn the loss by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Compare this to the re-imagined BSG, where the Cylons might have had a plan, but it became very evident they weren't letting the writers in on it. After what was the lamest and literally the most deux ex machina ending ever that was the final episode I didn't think I could ever be as infuriated after watching a show (well, Lost proved me wrong, but I digress).

      What? That makes no sense at all, unless you're speaking literally, "the god from the machine". But you said that. However...

      There was constant forward-reference to the eventual ending, starting with the very first episode of the miniseries. It becomes apparent when you watch the first episode a second time. There was nothing abrupt about any of it (though the 'selection' of the 'final 5' was seemingly not entirely planned out). "What will happen has happened before" with constant references to God ("the Cylon God") not being the same as the Gods, but being superior - and so on. If the ending was abrupt or out of place to you, you weren't paying attention to half the show.

      (G'kar and Londo make totally up for it though in my opinion)

      Egads. They were the least believable characters! What's next: a gurgling puddle of slime in the staring role?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    21. Re:I mourn the loss by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      BSG has a number. They're not perfect, but it's a far cry better than anything else out there that's worth watching.

      For instance, the Raptor ships have lateral burn thrusters for turning/maneuvering. (You can see this throughout the show if you're paying attention.) There are a couple 'ring ships' in the fleet. Weapons are mass drivers (guns), not stupid "energy pulse weapons". "Faster than light" space travel is plausible per the laws of physics. There are very real 'space' requirements, like air, material supply, etc. which play an integral part in the show.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    22. Re:I mourn the loss by CAIMLAS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's certainly how it started! And what nice boobs they were.

      One episode in and I was hooked, though.

      I didn't watch BSG, Firefly, Dollhouse, and hell, even Stargate, until they were almost done showing/were done showing (BSG - started watching S1 when S6 was showing; SG1, started @ season 1 when S9 or so was on TV). Why? Because I'd avoided them, thinking they were in the same class of shlock as B5 and Andromeda: horrible acting, worse props and races, and abhorent writing which focused on things which were so detached from anything relateable or real to throw it firmly into "fantasy" (eg. alien races, which look like us, talk like us, and generally behave much as we do).

      I strongly disagree on the 'philosophical stuff not belonging in scifi' point. Strongly - and so did Isaac Asimov, who arguably helped create Science Fiction. Philosophy, and the meaning of life, is an important emphasis within all (good, true) scifi. The "science" is merely a plot device, and to get hung up on it for the telling of the story is, IMO, as shortsighted as going into a strip club to drink. (Sure, they've got liquor there, but that's not why you go to the strip club. Not that I do, or anything.)

      BSG is horribly slow and dull if you overlook the 'human' and philosophical elements of BSG, though. I'll grant you that.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    23. Re:I mourn the loss by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      B5 gave you characters who you wanted to be.

      BSG gave real characters, all of which with their faults and strengths. Most of them (like most people) were unsavory to one degree or another, but

      Saul Tye, I disliked for the first several seasons. By the end, he was one of my favorites. Giaius Baltar was an outrageously unsavory character at the beginning, but by the end I could at least understand him, somewhat (even if I didn't "like" him, I could understand him.) The Chief is a 'constant' throughout the show, but he grows on your like a close friend; Adm. Adama, like a father. The opposite can be said for Kara Thrace.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    24. Re:I mourn the loss by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Long story short, Stargate SG1 held longer than any singlø run of Star Trek. They eventually succumbed to their own inflation of the stakes, nothing external. After defeating "gods" there is very little left to achieve....

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:I mourn the loss by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It is justified because BSG was the the Maryilyn Manson of SciFi shows. It was a laundry list of "What's Edgy" that just comes out as posing. It's pretty clear that the way BSG was designed was by sitting down making a list of what sells to the masses. Heck, they stole a character directly out of Startrek Voyager. I'm sure you will say that they were nothing alike, after all, one was 7 and the other was 8. Totally different numbers! The entire show was one big cheesefest. Yes, they had a better budget than BSG, but it is clear that they threw money at the problem rather than skilled writers. The story was rambling, and didn't even maintain consistency of it's story through the first season. I wanted to like the show. I really did. Unfortunately, it just sucked. Actually to be fair, if they didn't call it BSG, I might have given them more leeway. Instead, they set a bar that they couldn't reach. Maybe they should have called it Galactica 1980 instead. It would have been closer.

      As all good science fiction does, current events and the human condition were examined, placing the characters in moral quandaries throughout the show. Religion, origins, etc. were explored while maintaining a reasonable level of scientific realism. Significantly, B5 had none of these things.

      I don't know how you came to that conclusion. The only 'scientific realism' that I saw in BSG was the lack of sound in space. Since that has been a harping point amongst nerds for some time before, it just came off as another of the checklist items of "what's edgy". Contrary to half thought out beliefs, there is sound is space. You can perform an experiment right now to prove it. Say "Test. Test. Test." Go ahead, try it. Was there sound? Yep. Are you in space? Yep. Sound may not travel through a vacuum, but there is definitly sound in space. So, should you hear it in a TV show? That is artistic choice. Certainly if the perspective is from a first person, you should not be able to hear a ship fly by. On the other hand, if you are getting a third person perspective, thus are already recieving information that no character is getting, it makes exactly as much sense that you can hear the ships as you can see them.

      On the other hand B5 was constantly making a point to work with science. From explaining why the different races ship blow up in different colors, to acknowledging that not every species breaths the same air, to acknowleding that they could have pests. BSG on the other hand just says "God did it".

      Which brings us to religion. There is nothing new in BSG in it's "examination" of religion. It is just rehashing the Christian mythos with nothing new added. How you missed religion in B5 is beyond me. The entire 5 year story arc was riding the religious theme. Perhaps you missed it because it wasn't the same old story you've heard a million times. Maybe it was because it actually examined the religion instead of just saying "God did it". From the beginning to the end, B5 examined religion through the Shadows. Not only examining good and evil from the mortal view, but questioning the good and evil of the gods themselves. Going even farther, questioning whether the ideas of good and evil even apply.

      Basically your analysis is that BSG's simplistic trendy addition of those subjects counts, while B5's deeper analysis of the subject going so far as to even question if the questions are even asked right, doesn't count.

    26. Re:I mourn the loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religion, origins, etc. were explored while maintaining a reasonable level of scientific realism. Significantly, B5 had none of these things.

      Um, what? What?!?!

      Neither of these shows, taken as a whole, had a reasonable level of scientific realism.

      B5 did have at least the occasional genuine attempt at getting basic scientific concepts right. E.g. the way the human spacecraft maneuvered.

      I will give you this, though: B5 had characters which surpassed all but the original Star Trek for cheesy costumes and personas. Nobody before or since (except in Star Trek) has achieved such a 2D feel. The plots, likewise, were quite similar, often seemingly of a sitcom nature.

      Did I mention how bad the acting, characters, and plots were in B5? They might as well have disclosed "we wanted to make a Star Trek show but couldn't get licensing, so we changed Cardasians and the other races a bit and obscured things enough to not fetch the lawyers". Thanks, but I'd rather watch DS9.

      DS9 was largely a reaction to B5. B5's set on a space station with a diplomatic theme? Gotta copy that into the Trek universe!

      B5 was a flawed show in many ways, but a lot of what you pick on it for were the consequences of being on a tiny budget.

    27. Re:I mourn the loss by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. In my opinion I would have been very happy if Stargate ended when it was supposed to end, Season 7. After that it was just terrible writing and became campy with a few good episodes here.
      So I just convince myself that it did end with season 7 just like the Matrix ended with the original movie.

    28. Re:I mourn the loss by Stormie · · Score: 1

      The re-imaged BSG was largely unique in the quality it portrayed. The acting was good, the characters were good, and the story was complex and interwoven.

      No offence intended towards the quality of BSG, but I think it should be pointed out that making a quality ongoing television series starting in 2003 is a lot less impressive than doing the same thing starting in 1993. It's easy to forget just how enormously standards have risen in the last couple of decades - personally, I start measuring that rise with "Twin Peaks".

    29. Re:I mourn the loss by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      Has everyone forgotten Farscape????

    30. Re:I mourn the loss by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't contest your assertions about the BSG finale because, frankly, I'm on the fence about it myself. However...

      (G'kar and Londo make totally up for it though in my opinion)

      Egads. They were the least believable characters! What's next: a gurgling puddle of slime in the staring role?

      Excuse me, but what!? I'll admit G'Kar became a little too comical in season 5, but watch season 2's "The Long Twilight Struggle", in particular the council chamber scene where G'Kar is forced to give up his seat after his race surrenders to the Centauri. His proud, defiant exit speech utterly robs Londo of any sense of victory, and you see it in Londo's face.

    31. Re:I mourn the loss by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Sex is one thing, procreation is another. Star trek had Human-Vulcan and Human-Klingon half-breeds. Even with a common origin, how many generations should it take before 2 isolated populations can no longer sucessfully interbreed?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    32. Re:I mourn the loss by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it seems they have.
      Which is a shame as it was so very good.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  7. conspiracy. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    It might have been a lawsuit about a real stargate and the control software for it, disguised as a game that will never finish.

    1. Re:conspiracy. by delinear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then whatever secret the government is hiding behind Duke Nukem Forever must be truly terrifying.

    2. Re:conspiracy. by Miseph · · Score: 1

      I'd say the secret is that DNF is the training program for employees of Xe (The Mercenary Company Formerly Known as Blackwater), focused as it is on wantonly brutalizing everything, engaging in wildly promiscuous and only theoretically consensual sexual conduct, using steroids to better smash opponents and generally being an epic-level asshole to everyone... but that would be much too obvious for a "secret".

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  8. What a story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First, I'd never heard of somebody so literally stealing intellectual property.

    Second, why is it that whenever I read of a flagrant disregard of the basic protocols of human interaction and the law, it seems to involve the phrase, "Maricopa County".

    Finally, "they left the network cords to hang" (spins up and Hulks out): "WHAT KIND OF A MAN LYNCHES AN ETHERNET CABLE!"

    1. Re:What a story... by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Second, why is it that whenever I read of a flagrant disregard of the basic protocols of human interaction and the law, it seems to involve the phrase, "Maricopa County".

      Maybe because the head lawman of that county, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, is himself a notorious criminal...

  9. who owns Fresh Start? by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Breaking in, stealing components, gutting computers. Who's the CEO over? Joe Arpaio's little brother?

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:who owns Fresh Start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you got modded "Troll". I'm from AZ, and I thought it was funny!

    2. Re:who owns Fresh Start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Summary of TFA (I know, /. and all):

      New (?) board of directors fire company founder.
      Board of directors create new company, hire existing employees.
      Existing employees gut the physical assets of company 2 weeks after filing for bankruptcy protection (a period in which no creditor may seize any assets)
      Court reinstalls founder as CEO.
      Founder / CEO sees the physical assets gone, calls police.
      Police put an end to rape and pillage (okay, the pillage part, anyway).
      CEO files suit to retrieve assets and IP.
      License to publish game based on missing assets and IP expires.
      Court gives assets back to original owner.

  10. I hate Journalists by Herkum01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They won a court decision and got something from someone else. Is there a limit on the number of characters in their keyboard? Is it too much trouble to even research the story to find out what is going on? It is like watching the last 5 minutes of "Iron Man" and going WTF? Who is the good guy, Stark because he won, or because he blows up stuff?

    This is why I hate to read the article, I am hoping some /. poster is going to do the work of posting the back history. The thing the "journalist" did not do.

    1. Re:I hate Journalists by Saib0t · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there. I read the blurb here, then read the article, and I still can't figure out who did what to whom. Idiot journalists... If anyone cares to explain, that'd be much appreciated.

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    2. Re:I hate Journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you read the linked articles? The whole affair is a clusterfuck of people, companies, real and intellectual property, law suits and whatnot. I dare you to make any sense of it!

      When I read the summary, I was like "Oh nice, a Stargate MMO, let's find out more about it and the story!". After having RTFA and another it linked to, I was like "WTF, I need a dozen organigrams and flowcharts just to keep up with what's going on! I don't even care anymore!"

    3. Re:I hate Journalists by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Wow, yeah. Don't bother trying to hit the related stories links form the main article either. They're just as poorly written. I can't tell who did what ,when. As I now ( probably incorrectly ) understand, there was a company Cheyenne mountain that was developing a video game, they may have gone bankrupt. Other companies emerged from the dust out of former employees and inverters ( dark comet), Having access to Cheyenne studios, they just took stuff and the project itself for a small amount of money, with out the authorization of Cheyenne. Cheyenne then sued and won, not before dark star pretty much trashed the stuff dark comet had stolen.

      That's my best guess. Either that or it was Col Mustard in the study with the rope.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:I hate Journalists by Kagato · · Score: 4, Informative

      From reading the linked articles it seems like Cheyenne Mountain Entertainment was in Chap 11. Then someone (maybe a group of investors?) illegally sold the assets of the company to the new gaming companies for $100,000. It appears the court said that action was illegal both in terms of procedure and perhaps value as well. The motives are where the real dirt is, and I suspect you're not going to get a straight answer on that until after all the lawsuits are settled.

    5. Re:I hate Journalists by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Clusterfuck is a very good term for it. I knew some people who worked there and it was just insane. Towards the end employees went months without getting paid, some left for greener pastures which was complicated by the economic meltdown occurring at the time. Others kept grinding away on a project they had already put so many hours into, supported by savings or spouses employed elsewhere.

      Once again the Stargate IP continues to prove it's cursed.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    6. Re:I hate Journalists by delinear · · Score: 1

      Have you read the linked articles? The whole affair is a clusterfuck of people, companies, real and intellectual property, law suits and whatnot. I dare you to make any sense of it!

      Whereas it's a journalist's job to make sense of it. Not just say, here's a bunch of links, go knock yourself out, I'm off to the pub.

    7. Re:I hate Journalists by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's even stranger, in that Gary Whiting, had ANOTHER company, Garvick Properties, LLC that went bankrupt. Due to Whiting's shenanigans, "Cheyenne Mountain Games, Inc" (a subsidiary of "Cheyenne Mountain Entertainment, Inc") got dragged into the bankruptcy. As near as I can tell, that caused the subsidiary to go bankrupt too.

      Meanwhile, Tim Jensen, one time president of Cheyenne Mountain Entertainment got caught by the SEC trying to move assets between two OTHER companies he owned/controlled. He's the one accused of orchestrating asset transfer in THIS case, too. Apparently the courts agreed in some fashion, since they forced the return of the assets. (Jensen is also accused of "Stalling Stargate Worlds for years", but it doesn't really sound like it was ready for prime time anyway....)

      The articles (as a whole) are real hazy about divisions between CM Games and CM Entertainment, which might well reflect some ambiguity on the ground.

    8. Re:I hate Journalists by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Don't be so outdated. Making sense of stories is the sort of antiquated stuff they did in the twentieth century.

  11. Pitty - it was a good game by gravis777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was in the early alpha and beta testing of Worlds, as I had a friend at Cheyenne Mountain. It was the first MMO I actually liked. It was a little buggy, but the game was almost done when bankruptcy hit. This was complicated by some freeze being put on the accounts where, even though the money was there, they were not able to pay their employees. Shoot, the game was in Beta, there were just a few bugs to work out, the server farms were going online - the game was pretty much READY - and the inside word was that they were weeks (about two months) from going live. Quite sad what became of it.

    1. Re:Pitty - it was a good game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely disagree. I have no idea what the hell you're talking about to be totally honest - I was also involved in the testing for this game and it was far from finished. When the testing ended at the end of last year we had seen only the starting zone for two of the groups of players out of the 6 total - and that's literally it. Forget mid game content, forget end game, literally the "starting town" for the two human factions. The game was riddled with bugs and fundamental flaws in the combat system. It was a very very long way from completion. Inside word might have been two months from going live, but if that's true then that just speaks to the utter delusion of those involved in developing it.

    2. Re:Pitty - it was a good game by malakai · · Score: 1

      Let's all agree that pretty much any MMO, once released, is still 2-3 years away from completion.

      If these guys were going bankrupt before even selling pre-orders, they were already FUBAR'd.

    3. Re:Pitty - it was a good game by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      After being featured in WarGames: The Dead Code, there's no way in hell I'd buy this game. Hint to developers: make sure if you sign a product placement deal, the movie won't suck shit.

    4. Re:Pitty - it was a good game by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Employee wages are a priority claim in a bankruptcy, second only to Secured claims. IANAL, but they could well have been cooking their books somewhat. Had I been an employee with them, I would have taken a sharp eye to the bankruptcy court. As a creditor, you'd have that right.

      OTOH, "two months from going live" might have been the same sort of readiness that Stargate: Resistance had, when it was shoved out the door bare weeks before bankruptcy was declared. IE "two months and holding".

      Glad, though, to know what became of the game. Saw the ads on TV, thought it was imminent, then ... nothing.

  12. It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, Star Trek brought to us a vision of the future wherein no matter where one roams in the universe, 1) Everybody looks human, 2) Everybody speaks perfect English, despite never having been contacted before by humans, and 3) Sex with alien species is considered perfectly natural. All I can say is... Ewwwwwwwww!

    Oh come on.

    To be fair, Star Wars, BattleStar Galactica, Firefly, Babylon 5, Dr. Who, Space: 1999, and a host of other shows all featured those characteristics.

    It's not because the shows' makers were unimaginative, it's because they are television shows.

    It's difficult to find actors who don't look like humans; audiences in the countries where these shows were produced mainly understand only English (there are no native Klingon speakers, no matter how many nerds learn the Klingon language); and sex keeps stupid people watching the show, helping the ratings. Ok, Dr. Who hasn't featured much, if any, sex, but that's because it was a BBC production aimed at families.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by novium · · Score: 1

      Firefly didn't *have* any aliens, so none of those seem to apply, except 'everyone looking human'...because they were.

    2. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      There was sex in Stargate? Heck, even Vala's pregnancy was through some manner of immaculate conception (Adria's birth was probably not a virgin birth, though).

      The closest thing would have been the original pilot (full frontal nudity), but the directors/producers never quite liked that scene and chopped it from the re-cut version.

      Data and Tasha Yar getting it on was far more blatant as far as 'sex' goes.

    3. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Dr. Who didn't have out-and-out sex, but name one of his assistants that wasn't "hot". To juxtapose, try to imagine Mrs. Marple being the Dr.'s sidekick.

    4. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by digitig · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't speak for you, but K-9 doesn't do it for me.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    5. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by delinear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dr. Who didn't have out-and-out sex, but name one of his assistants that wasn't "hot". To juxtapose, try to imagine Mrs. Marple being the Dr.'s sidekick.

      I can think of one - but then again I guess it's what "floats your boat".

    6. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by delinear · · Score: 1

      I should also point out that Doctor Who doesn't fall under "everyone speaks English" - actually everyone/everything speaks their own language and the Doctor and his companions are able to comprehend them due to an aspect of the TARDIS. Admittedly that's a huge deus ex machina to get around the issue, but at least they made the effort to explain it. I'd also say that, since it's return in 2005, it no longer falls foul of "Everyone looks human", although admittedly a fair few of the alien races are still humanoid. And they dumped all the sex into Torchwood.

    7. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by meerling · · Score: 1

      There have been several companions that aren't even vaguely sexy (unless you've got strange tastes), and until the new series, the Doctor hadn't even kissed anyone. Probably the sexiest companion was Leela of the Sevateem. You could describe her as a very bright but primitive jungle jane in animal skin outfit with miniskirt. (Ok, not a really good description of her costume, but it's close enough.) It didn't even have bared midriff. By today's standards, it's rather freaking tame.

      Sex was something the old series tried to avoid for the most part. As to most of the companions being attractive, name one tv show that has the majority of main characters that are ugly. Kind of hard, isn't it. TV tends to have attractive people because they have better ratings, even if they don't go for any sex games.

      If you actually want some info on the companions, especially to find those you don't think are 'hot', then start with the list at:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who_companions

      (The old series had 9 companions that were male, and 3 that were robotic, the new series has had 5 male companions, and I don't think anybody has ever gotten excited by the Brigadier in the old series, or Wilfred in the new series.)

    8. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      There was sex in Stargate?

      yea, basically everyone was getting it on..

      O'Neill and Sam were doing it since the first season

      Sam was naked in several episodes

      Rodney kept having sex fantasies about Sam

      Daniel kept falling in love with bush babes on nearly every planet

      Teal'c had a wife, left her then hooked up with Ishta

      Vala was trying to hump anything that moved

      On Atlantis Rodney was boinking Dr Keller

      Teyla got knocked up out of wedlock

      I think there was a lot of sex on Stargate...

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    9. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There are a few instances in the new series where aliens seem to either speak or write in English with no TARDIS present to translate.

    10. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're wrong on every point. Sam and Jack never had sex. Sam was never naked in any episode. Teal'c wife was long dead when he met Ishta. Telya's people didn't have the same concept of "marriage" that we have so "wedlock" is meaningless. Your other comments are too idiotic to respond to.

    11. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cannon establishes the following:

      - The Doctor speaks just about every language worth speaking. There are some he doesn't. This is because he is nine hundred years old and the produce of an exceptionally strict system of education.

      - The Tardis, via a telepathic link to the Doctor, via it's own database or via telepathic link to the speaker, translates for all those who travel or have traveled within it: They percieve themselves speaking their native language, but the TARDIS is actually fiddling in their brain, translating on the fly without them realising it. The range of this ability is enough to cover an entire planet. This also works for written text. It will not work only if the speaker is conciously choosing which language to speak - in which case, effects can be unpredictable. Yes, the TARDIS itsself has a telepathic interface. The Master demonstrated this once by hacking it to make the Doctor speak everything backwards.

      For handy reference, regarding other shows: Star trek had all ships fitted with a universial translator, carrying a huge linguistic database. Babylon 5 simply had everyone learn a common language - justified by half the cast being ambassadors, and the others working in the space equivilent of the UN. Even so, some aliens used translation devices. Stargate has... nada. Nope. Nothing. Zilch. Everyone speaks english with no explanation given ever, and they all understand perfectly. For some reason this applies only to spoken language - written languages vary hugely, and must be painstakeingly learned the hard way. The show's producers have acknowledged this oddity, but point out that it's really hard to explore strange new worlds when you can't speak to anyone. Finally, Farscape had the translator microbes, which were inspired by the Babel Fish of HHGTG, itsself created in a mocking acknowledgement of the way language issues were overlooked in sci-fi for the sake of an easier story.

    12. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Every point I made is correct and verifiable. Clearly you don't watch the show much.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    13. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      what.. all of that is -sex- now?

      I think that means I had sex at least a dozen times today. I've also been exposed to others' acts of sex at least 500 times.

      I know SG-1 very well, and Atlantis somewhat, and although I find little flaw in the descriptions of the examples you propose.. they're just not examples of sex to me.

      So a person is pregnant. Yes, that (usually, see: Vala) implies sex was had. But I don't remember any of the characters referencing this act.. nevermind -showing- it.. which is what sex would be to me.

      Even in Firefly, Kaylee mentions not having had nothin' not run on batteries twixt her nethers. Is that a sexual comment? Sure. Is that -sex-? No, not unless there's an X-Rated version of the thing where they cut to a flashback showing that which she described.

      As for there hardly being any sex in Dr. Who. Uhm.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/7679858/Sexed-up-Dr-Who-scenes-prompt-complaints-to-BBC.html
      That certainly goes -well- beyond anything that has been in Stargate SG-1 (pilot excluded, see previous comment).

    14. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Sex doesn't only mean intercourse. Sex is also simply sexual.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    15. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      While I agree that sex isn't limited to intercourse, I disagree that anything 'sexual' is sex. One could argue that a character saying "you're looking GOOD in that dress" is a sexual come-on. But to then say there was sex in that show.. to me, that's absurd.

    16. Re:It's just a tv show! They're all just tv shows! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The original Star Trek crew was constantly encountering previously unknown species and immediately being able to communicate with them -- even when all the crew members devices were confiscated. I only recall one episode of ST:TNG wherein they encountered refugees that, despite looking perfectly human, the universal translator actually took a while to learn their language before they could communicate. Yes, these lapses in logic were plot devices intended to help the story move forward.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  13. Well crap.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    I was really looking forward to trying out the Stargate MMO.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  14. I'm sure the Founder will be pleased by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Though I'm not sure what a Changeling wants with an MMO anyway when they have half the galaxy to play with.

    Oh wait, wrong "Star" series...

  15. Stargate MMO - Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Forget that old plagaristic Stargate MMO lame-ass-ity - Fringeworthy MMO FTW!!!

    It's coming bi'ches!!

    Seriously though a free MMO where Gates lead to new persistent server worlds - where user content servers are allowed - and could even contain parallel universes or lead back/forward in time - THAT is the future WoW Killer!

    (and hardcore role-players could opt-in to allowing characters to permanently die - and worlds permanently change - based on real player actions)

    I say - Make it So!

    1. Re:Stargate MMO - Hah! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Then, why not just make a Rifts MMORPG and call it a day?

  16. Re:So hard work doesn't pay. by Cyberblah · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was gone by then, but based on what I know of the people who started it, Fresh Start's goal was to continue supporting a game they believed in. While still at Cheyenne, they completed and released Resistance quickly under terrible circumstances (circumstances that I fled), only to be betrayed by Gary Whiting with a bankruptcy filing the instant they brought the company its first revenue ever. Then they managed to form a company to continue supporting the game. They kept the servers up and even released new maps and improved some of the graphics assets.

    This article is 100% Mr. Whiting's side of the story. While at Cheyenne I formed the opinion that he is a very shady individual, but I was pretty low on the totem pole, so I don't know what was really going on.

    What I know for sure, however, is that Resistance would never have come out without the people behind Fresh Start, and it probably would have been completely unsupported from the moment of release (possibly unplayable, with the servers down) without the formation of Fresh Start. So I'm going to give them a pretty fucking big benefit of the doubt.

    Oh, and based on the financial situation when I left, the people working for Fresh Start were probably getting paid next to nothing, if that much. So obviously "stealing" pays big time.

  17. Games? Meh. by intellitech · · Score: 1

    I would just like to see SG-1 or Atlantis back on air..

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
  18. Someone explain this by iSzabo · · Score: 1

    TFA uses 'it' so many times between 3 companies I have no idea what's going on. It sounds like a kindergarten argument over possession of a sandbox - where the sandbox is assets and IP.

  19. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The cut network cords were simply where the server racks were removed. They weren't actually cut, just pulled out of punch down blocks. The reason for the apparent gutting was because the landlord was going to lock the company out of the building, so Dark Comet was trying to save as many assets before that happened. There wasn't enough space for all the computers, so the hard drives were taken to prevent the data from being misused by whomever the landlord brought in to sell off the equipment. Everything was done with permission from the receiver, and event when the cops were called was resolved in favor of the people with the equipment because it wasn't company property. There is a general lack of correct information about what happened with Cheyenne and Dark Comet, but overall the intentions were to save the games and not destroy them. The primary reason Dark Comet is giving back the assets is they ran out of money.

  20. S:AAB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always liked Space: Above and Beyond. The aliens were humanoid, but not human. They didn't speak english, in fact, they didn't understand each other at all. It wasn't a soap opera either.

    I would have liked to see that one end instead of just getting canned on a cliff hanger (sort of a cliff hanger, really just more of a REALLY bad day for everyone.)

  21. Re:So hard work doesn't pay. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    +1 informative

    Yeah I'd steal too if I wasn't getting paid for my work.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall