Slashdot Mirror


Bacteria Used To Fix Cracked Concrete

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the UK's University of Newcastle have created a new type of bacteria that generates glue to hold together cracks in concrete structures — that means everything from concrete sidewalks to buildings that have been damaged by earthquakes. When the cells have been germinated, they burrow deep into the concrete until they reach the bottom. At this point, the concrete repair process is activated, and the cells split into three types that produce calcium carbonate crystals, act as reinforcing fibers, and produce glue which acts as a binding agent to fill concrete gaps."

33 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Okay. by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's officially "the future".

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Okay. by somaTh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope, still the present. Well, it was. Now it's the past. Stupid entropy.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    2. Re:Okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Call me when they can pour this Bacterial pudding into a bullet wound and have it heal up...that's the future I'm waiting for. Then I can finally start my crime-fighting vigilante spree.

    3. Re:Okay. by camperslo · · Score: 4, Informative

      An older article with considerably more detail. Not sure if it's the same bacteria.

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19386-for-selfhealing-concrete-just-ad

    4. Re:Okay. by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like a giant "Just So" story if you ask me.

      Lots of pre-programed mutations working perfectly in the laboratory to seal cracks of a known nature.

      Activated when the reach the bottom. Bottom? What if there is no bottom? Most cracks in concrete go right thru the slab.

      React to the specific PH of the concrete? If only all concrete were the same. Its been in use for several hundred years, and the formula has been constantly evolving.

      And nothing is said about the strength. If the concrete was broken by whatever means, what are the chances some bio glue could hold it together against the next insult?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:Okay. by sadness203 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem, with bullet wound is... they are not always clean, you can have some clothes debris, or other dirt. Closing the wound is easy (well, relatively speaking) but cleaning it well enough is another thing.

    6. Re:Okay. by Gotung · · Score: 4, Informative

      Several hundred years? Try several thousand.

    7. Re:Okay. by Gilmoure · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait, when was this?!!!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:Okay. by locallyunscene · · Score: 3, Informative

      The main problem with a bullet wound is that it used to be a normal functioning part of the body and not a bullet wound...

    9. Re:Okay. by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right, and battery acid is really good at curing the common cold.

      I dunno where you're getting this info, but no, bullets certainly do not "sterilize" anything. One of the leading causes of death historically has been infection. We're better at dealing with it today, but infections still occur on a regular basis:

      "A gunshot is never sutured closed as the infection rate is very high. Bullets drag clothing into the wound and along the bullet track. Since clothing is of course not sterile, the wound is prone to infection if closed. Open wounds almost never get infected."
      http://www.tacticalmedicalpacks.com/files/Combat_Tactics_Trauma_article.pdf

      "We have presented a series of 120 consecutive operative cases of penetrating wounds of the abdomen-72 gunshot wounds and 48 stab wounds. The majority of patients were in the 18 to 40 age group. The infection rate was 22% for gunshot wounds and 4.8% for knife wounds."
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2609419/pdf/jnma00480-0069.pdf

  2. When does it stop? by Mishotaki · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is it gonna stop? when they run out of concrete to fill, when they overpopulate and eat all the concrete "cracks" or when they kill all humans and we can't record the moment it stops because there won't be any humans to observe it?

    1. Re:When does it stop? by countSudoku() · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA, it's not very long and explains just that fact you need; it does know when to stop.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:When does it stop? by shadowrat · · Score: 5, Funny

      "and they have a built-in self-destruct gene that prevents them from proliferating away from the concrete target."

      That never works in the movies. One cosmic ray and the gene is replaced by another one that says," invade humans and turn them into statues."

    3. Re:When does it stop? by khallow · · Score: 3, Funny

      invade humans and turn them into statues

      Living, moving statues with a ravenous, uncontrollable hunger for the brains of the unpetrified. Prepare yourself for 90 minutes of bad stoner jokes.

    4. Re:When does it stop? by ross.w · · Score: 3, Funny

      They'll only be statues when you're looking at them.

      Don't blink.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  3. Re:How do they know where 'the bottom' is? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, since grey goo is such an abstract concept, they thought they would rather use something more concrete ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. Call in sick by boristdog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't come in today, my street has a bad cold.

    1. Re:Call in sick by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know, it looks very congested.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  5. Re:Gigacrete looks better by Skidborg · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do realize that most waste products that can be used as you mentioned contain toxins themselves? Bottom ash and fly ash from coal plants is comparable to nuclear waste.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  6. Re:Lungs by mattdm · · Score: 3, Informative

    What's the acidity of your lungs? Oh, I see. You didn't read the article. Carry on, then.

  7. Re:Gigacrete looks better by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gigacrete looks like a better material for building in my opinion. I'll just have bacteria in my yogurt for now.

    Nice GigaCrete advert but the bacteria isn't presented as a replacement for concrete or GigaCrete. It's presented as a mechanism to repair existing concrete.

    Or are you advocating we raze all existing concrete buildings and tear up all sidewalks?

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  8. Re:How do they know where 'the bottom' is? by falldeaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that whole nanobot grey goo problem is way overhyped. Biological organisms are much more advanced than our technology and they haven't been able to turn all matter into copies of themselves yet, despite their best efforts.

    --
    check out the Mp3 Garbler I built!
  9. Re:Gigacrete looks better by Vegeta99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They said the binder was 100% non-toxic. which is only a small percentage of the product (as filler is the rest, up to 80%).

    To see another example of "green" being a fib, look up AggRite construction/pavement aggregate.

  10. "decommoditization" of concrete? by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    React to the specific PH of the concrete? If only all concrete were the same. Its been in use for several hundred years, and the formula has been constantly evolving.

    Remember Monsanto and "roundup ready" seeds? Now imagine a "bio-healing ready" concrete... concrete that is differentiated by a specific compound formula which is standardized for a specific bacteria (of course several grades of the product combo will exist for both quality and usage differences ... which also allow for market segmentation)

    All it will take is some enterprising megacorp with the legal muscle to patent this combo (and defend the patents) and you can effectively raised margin on concrete 10x at least.

    Anything can be de-commoditized if it provides unique value and a big enough megacorp.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  11. More Info From iGEM by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    This engineered bacterium system was entered into the International Genetically Engineered Machine competition, so there's a lot more information about this project at the team's project page. In particular, there's a more thorough description of the kill switch the team engineered to prevent the spread of this bacterium beyond the target environment, the underlying mechanism being that sucrose must be available in the environment to prevent the bacterium from producing a toxin which kills itself.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    1. Re:More Info From iGEM by Stupid+McStupidson · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Mommy, I spilled my shake all over the sidewalAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGHGGHGHGHG"

  12. Re:Gigacrete looks better by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Informative

    So basically, it had nothing at all do with the topic hand and your comparison "I'll just have bacteria in my yogurt for now" was completely meaningless since no one has suggested building new things with it since that wouldn't work anyway.

  13. Re:Read teh article. by BrotherBeal · · Score: 3, Funny

    The spores germinate only in very alkaline environments... ...but the bases are nominally covered.

    I see what you did there.

    --
    I'm disabling ads until because I choose not to reward redesigns that are less usable than "view source".
  14. Re:How do they know where 'the bottom' is? by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Absolute worst case scenario is a grey goo outbreak being treated basically like a fire (which, when you think about it is the ultimate grey goo machine). There's a limit to how much energy is available for replication, and there's a limit on how efficient you can make your replication (at some level, the replicating nanobots will be literally tearing apart and putting back together materials). Fighting the grey goo only involves tearing about the replicators, not necessarily wasting energy putting the pieces back together into something useful.

    In other words, it should be trivial to design a nanobot that tears apart the self-replicators but doesn't waste energy by making copies of itself. This nanobot would be manufactured a head of time and stored for future use, or manufactured in specialist facilities (even in a mobile truck if necessary) that provide the energy input necessary for their production. As long as your facilities have more energy available than the self-replicators do, you'll win out eventually. And the replicators will only have about as much energy available as a fire can produce.

  15. Re:Lungs by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative
    It turns out that the press release is not really accurate with regard to the effect pH has on this engineered bacterium. The starting bacterium, Bacillus subtilis 168 naturally prefers a neutral pH, but by growing generations of this bacteria in media with gradually increased pH, it can be acclimated to thrive at the pH of concrete (roughly 10). This requires no engineered genetic modification. The steps to control the spread of this bacterium have little to do with pH, actually. First, the bacterium comes from a strain of Bacillus subtilis which has been produced as the result of decades of laboratory cultures, and is a mutant which depends on many key nutrients to be present in its enviroment to survive. In the wild, it would be a massively deficient competitor to wild Bacillus subtilis, which is extremely common in nature.

    Also, the concrete repair activity is produced by upregulation of genes natural to Bacillus subtilis, not by anything transgenic. The upregulation of these genes presents an energy cost to the engineered bacterium while providing no benefit- if these bacteria mutate, it is more likely to be towards the wild phenotype. In addition, the team responsible has added a kill switch which tells the bacteria to commit suicide if sucrose is not present.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  16. Re:Lungs by Phillip2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One has an immune system, and the other looks like concrete.

  17. Re:Why use bacteria? Just insert glue directly! by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you've ever tried to pump glue into a crack in concrete, you'll quickly figure that out. It's somewhere between messy and inadequate as a repair method, and certainly doesn't get into the smaller cracks, let alone the microcracks. The idea here is to have the glue self-extend, filling the air pockets and microcracks that no glue with sufficient surface tension to stick could ever manage.

    However I think where this will become a more useful technique is for fixing the kinds of surface cracks that ail structures exposed to repeated wet/freeze/thaw cycles -- the typical winter climate for the east slope of the Rocky Mountains. Mount Rushmore would seem to be a good candidate, since seasonal surface cracking is what's causing damage.

    Concrete roads that suffer similar winter freeze/thaw damage could also benefit -- instead of trying to patch the road one crack at a time (usually an exercise in futility, culminating in yawning potholes), or having to dig up and replace the concrete (an extremely expensive job), just wash it with a slurry of this bacteria. That could even eliminate most of the seasonal damage, by filling the microcracks that are where freeze damage starts.

    Imagine if your state and local highway departments could reduce their budgets by simply needing to do less repair on concrete-based roads. Even if you don't believe in reducing taxes when need is reduced, it would free up that budget to use elsewhere.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  18. Re:Another problem is quacks. by Reziac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, we've fixed the holes in the concrete, and made holes in people. Seems to me the logical next step is to fill the holes in the people with concrete.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?