Slashdot Mirror


Review of Dell Inspiron Tablet/Laptop Hybrid

Barence writes "It's rare that Dell breaks new ground in terms of design, but the new Dell Inspiron Duo changes all that, according to PC Pro. First revealed at IDF earlier this year, the Dell netbook has a screen that swivels in its own lid, turning the Windows 7 device into a tablet. 'The Duo's relatively modest premium over a high-end netbook buys you the touchscreen and slick conversion to the tablet format, as well as full Windows 7 and a decent hard drive. If you were thinking about buying either a netbook or a tablet, the Duo does both, though it doesn't do the tablet bit as well as an iPad,' PC Pro's reviewer, Jack Schofield, concludes."

156 comments

  1. Idiots by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you were thinking about buying either a netbook or a tablet

    Then you are an idiot, because tablets are suboptimal for all kinds of use except as book/movie players.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Idiots by nyctopterus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tablets are better for showing photos/artwork... well most kinds of presenting really. Consumption rather than production.

    2. Re:Idiots by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      They are optimal for anything that doesn't require heavy typing or heavy use of system resources.

    3. Re:Idiots by VortexCortex · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tablets are better for showing photos/artwork... well most kinds of presenting really. Consumption rather than production.

      Yep, I'll be doing a presentation shortly, and for this I'll use my iPad.
      I'll just hook my projector up to-- oh, guess I'll be using my laptop after all.

      Turns out: "better" is your opinion, and your idea of "presenting" is incredibly narrow.

    4. Re:Idiots by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amateur. I do all of my presentations by having everyone crowd around my iPad. It gives the whole thing a more intimate feel, especially when I have 50 people jostling each other trying to see the screen.

      You want me to use an archaic device like a projector? Copping a feel on the hot intern in Accounting is damn near impossible if you're not crammed around a tiny device straining to see what's going on. Think, man!

    5. Re:Idiots by StuartHankins · · Score: 5, Informative

      You need to do more research. The connector is a measly $29. http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC552ZM/A

    6. Re:Idiots by gurner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, I'll be doing a presentation shortly, and for this I'll use my iPad.
      I'll just hook my projector up to-- oh, guess I'll be using my laptop after all.

      Turns out: "better" is your opinion, and your idea of "presenting" is incredibly narrow.

      Turns out: you're wrong. It's one thing to have an opinion, it's another to be clueless.

      What you need:
      http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MC552ZM/A

      How it works in practice:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GysMfb4_79A

    7. Re:Idiots by Graff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, I'll be doing a presentation shortly, and for this I'll use my iPad.
      I'll just hook my projector up to-- oh, guess I'll be using my laptop after all.

      Actually, the iPad works great for presentations:
      Keynote + Dock Connector to VGA Adapter

      I know a bunch of people who use the iPad for presentations and they love how well it works.

    8. Re:Idiots by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      No, he was talking about artwork and photos. The conversation would be more like:

      Here's my portfolio.
      -turns on the tablet and passes it around-

      A flat surface is a lot easier for more than one person to look at and pass around than a laptop screen is, and the colors are a lot better represented on an tablet versus a projected image. Not all presentations need a projector - just the boring ones.

    9. Re:Idiots by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit that's my opinion, who else's would it be?

      And you can hook up an iPad to a projector, just as you can an iPod or iPhone. I'm sure other tablets are around with the same capabilities.

    10. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      rich punk. you think money grows on trees?

    11. Re:Idiots by gurner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, no shit that's my opinion, who else's would it be?

      Seems like it's not just your opinion. In fact, judging by the replies it seems like the only person who doesn't share your opinion is Mr VC...

    12. Re:Idiots by blai · · Score: 1

      Measly, eh?

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    13. Re:Idiots by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      But....does it run Linux?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Idiots by Graff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $29 is peanuts when you are talking about the corporate world and large presentations. They spend more than that just in printing out the handouts for the presentation, not to mention travel, hotel, meals, and other expenses. Corporate presentations can easily run into the thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars for large companies.

      A one-time cost of $29 for a connector that will be used dozens of times a year? Yeah, it's chump change.

    15. Re:Idiots by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you were thinking about buying either a netbook or a tablet

      Then you are an idiot, because tablets are suboptimal for all kinds of use except as book/movie players.

      I'd say that netbooks/notebooks/laptops are suboptimal for all kinds of use that don't have you sitting at a desk/table/chair-type setup.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    16. Re:Idiots by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Funny

      Measly, eh?

      For an Apple accessory, yes.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    17. Re:Idiots by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... this looked great untiil

      1. I saw the price; 500 pounds is what, about $800? I paid $300 for my Acer Aspire One; same size, probably the same memory/drive space/processor, and
      2. It has an SVGA out connector (in addition to three USB ports).

      It also has a built-in webcam and microphone. I only skimmed TFA, but I didn't see those features mentioned for the Dell.

      The swiveling screen is cool; I'd really like one of those Dells, but at the price I just can't see how it's worth the money. I could get an Apple netbook for that much.

    18. Re:Idiots by r337ard · · Score: 1

      You need to do more research. The connector is a measly $29. http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC552ZM/A

      That device is also requires app support, numerous reviews on that page say it doesn't mirror output and doesn't work for a number of apps. Your presentation might not go that well after all, unless of course you only use Keynote and Videos for your presentations; or jailbreak the phone to enable mirroring...

    19. Re:Idiots by Missing.Matter · · Score: 0

      There was a time before iPad when the majority of tablets came with a digitizer for pen input. Obviously this hindered mass adoption, but the is made tablets perfect for note taking and drawing. Currently the iPad and similar touch only tablets are suitable for content consumption, while there is a whole other class of tablets out there meant for content creation.

      Hopefully the stylus will find its way back to join touch.

    20. Re:Idiots by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      True, but not every application supports projector output. The iPad doesn't simply duplicate the display; this features is enabled on a per app basis. So if you were hoping to display certain content from an app, you may be out of luck. However, apps like Keynote and Penultimate (recently) support this.

    21. Re:Idiots by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait...let me understand something here.

      They're a rich punk for suggesting a $29 connector?

    22. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $29 for what amounts to a dongle?

      Order of magnitude price inflation --> rich punk. Or corporate shill, if you prefer. Or sucker who paid $29 for a $2 dongle.

      Oh, and even with the dongle, the ability of the iPad to act as a presentation device is pretty damn limited due to some poor implementation and feature choices. It works to a very limited degree in very limited cases spoon-fed to you by Apple, and god help you if you needed to do something else. It doesn't play nice with others.

    23. Re:Idiots by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Informative

      While true, there are some things you leave out. First, notice the presenter view on the iPad. It displays slide number and.... well that's it. I'm used to the power point presenter view, which displays the slide, your slide deck, notes, a timer, and drawing tools. For the iPad you have to constantly turn around to see the screen. Also you can't annotate the screen. These are seriously limitations to presentations.

      Further, as I mentioned, VGA output is enabled on a per app basis. For example, you can't plug the iPad into a TV and watch shows using the ABC player, while this functionality is standard on any netbook with a web browser. For presentations, this means you can't open a web page to show your audience, a common enough task, as safari doesn't support VGA out.

      So, while you assume the parent was referencing an inability to connect his iPad to a projector, he was actually alluding to the anemic presentation functionality it offers.

    24. Re:Idiots by Missing.Matter · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a lecturer, I have a presentation every other day. I find my iPad is awful for them, as you can't annotate the slides. Further, developing presentations in iPad Keynote is an exercise in patience, while exporting from Power Point to keynote is a crapshoot, especially if you have complex animations. I resort to my trusty Dell Latitude XT for presentations. Even if it is heavier, it offers much more functionality.

    25. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copping a feel on the hot intern in Accounting is damn near impossible if you're not crammed around a tiny device straining to see what's going on.

      That's what she said....oh wait.

    26. Re:Idiots by danieltdp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      30 bucks for a freakin connector?! A couple of wires and metal!? So two of these costs the same as a game that took millions of dollars to produce and thousands of man-hours of code. Measly, for sure

      --
      -- dnl
    27. Re:Idiots by agendi · · Score: 1

      Every few days I go to a presentation that some hot shot decides to run off their iPad using that dongle. They almost always end up apologizing for attempting it when the refresh rate is poor, the color is off and there are update issues when you rotate the devices. Even iPad wielding (and loving) senior management have pretty much ceased using it as a presentation device if there is anything else available to use. Having said that, for a 2 or 3 person show around a desk, it still punches above its weight.

      --
      I just can't be bothered.
    28. Re:Idiots by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I could get an Apple netbook for that much.

      Apple doesn't build a netbook. For that matter for that price, it doesn't matter who built it, it isn't a netbook.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    29. Re:Idiots by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      If $29 stops you the $500 iPad price certainly isn't in your budget. Nonissue.

    30. Re:Idiots by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Bet you haven't purchased any USB2 or HDMI cables lately huh?

    31. Re:Idiots by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Well, I would consider the macbook air to be in the netbook range. Instead of using a slow Atom processor, it just uses a slow *and* outdated ULV core2duo.

      Alright... They may not be that slow, but they aren't as good as the core i19 in my desktop with 4 petabytes of RAM and a 1.21 gigawatt power supply!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    32. Re:Idiots by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      you are the imbecile if you can't think of other uses.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    33. Re:Idiots by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The macbook air costs over $500 and has a screen larger than 10 inches that means it is not a netbook. Manufacturers may redefine the term anyway they want, but the niche that the original netbooks filled was a small, cheap portable device.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    34. Re:Idiots by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      There are so many potential Dilbert strips here...

      I know the guy who presented this convertible tablet originally. I've had conversations about the tablet market with him for two years. To summarise it went something like this:

      Me: Dude, have you checked out the Tegra processor, and the iPhone touch screen technology? Dell could make a real splash here. You could probably get Canonicle to write a whole new touch interface for this thing for free. The killer app is an e-book reader that also does color Internet browsing. If you use a Pixel Qi display, you'll dominate. If you built it, I'll buy one for every member of my family.
      Dell dude: But wouldn't you rather pay just a little more and have a device that is just as good or better, and also runs all your favourite Windows apps?
      Me: If it runs Windows, it will fail horribly. We need a whole new interface to support touch interface, and Microsoft hasn't done anything innovative in about a decade.
      Dell Dude: What you're talking about is something completely new. Dell doesn't create new markets. Instead, we wait for others to prove the market, and then we crush them with our manufacturing prowess.
      Me: But... but... but... my last three Dell machines have sucked, and Dell's support is a bunch of Indians paid to piss me off!

      I kid you not. True story. Marketing at it's best.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    35. Re:Idiots by makomk · · Score: 1

      USB2 cables are about $5, as are HDMI cables. You can get them for less if you look hard.

    36. Re:Idiots by makomk · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that dongles tend to get lost, break, get left behind, etc... (The other problem is that not all large presentations are corporate presentations, and most corporate presentations are internal ones that don't involve travel.)

    37. Re:Idiots by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It won't take external media (DCs, DVDs, floppies) and can only be accessed by wireless or network cable, well, it's a netbook. I don't care how much the damned thing costs.

      If I put a price of $1k on an Acer Aspire, does that make it not a netbook?

      And as to "cheap", the McBook Air IS cheap, compared to any other Apple computer.

    38. Re:Idiots by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Fine, by your definition, netbook is just a different word for UMPC. What word would you suggest for an inexpensive (less than $400), small (10 inches or less) portable computer?
      I thought we had settled on netbook as that term, you say that "netbook" is a computer that won't take external media and can only be accessed by wireless or network cable. Personally, neither of those were part of my definition of netbook.
      Once again, the reason that there exists a "netbook" segment of the PC market is because they were cheap. PC manufacturers have been trying to create an Ultra Portable market segment since at least the 90s, but they wanted to make it a premium price point. That failed.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    39. Re:Idiots by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      So, people wouldn't buy expensive netbooks, but will buy inexpensive netbooks, therefore if it's expensive it's not a netbook? OK, whatever.

    40. Re:Idiots by dwinks616 · · Score: 1

      Really? I watched that video and I would NEVER want to have to try to give a presentation on that piece of crap. Seriously, you connected a screen and have to turn around and put your back to the audience to see the slides? You've got to be kidding. Then you have to tap a ridiculously small square on the completely blank screen to go back a slide? Guess you could just use the arrow keys to do that...oh, wait...

      Oh, maybe you could just plug one of the cheap and nifty Logitech presentation-oriented mice into the usb slot...oh, never mind, can't do that...

      Hell, you can buy a laptop perfectly powerful enough to run Powerpoint 2003, 2007 or 2010, a logitech presentation style mouse, a vga cable and a freaking projector suitable for a small to medium sized conference room (sure, it'll need to be darkened, as the cheapie projectors aren't very bright at all) and still have enough money left over for a nice steak dinner compared to the price of a stupid iPad.

      Your "in practice" video pretty much absolutely reinforces the post you are replying to about needing to use a laptop to give a presentation, since the iPad is utterly worthless for doing so, as demonstrated in that video.

    41. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tag me as you like. Truth is still truth

  2. Entirely new! by nyctopterus · · Score: 3, Funny

    To all those thinking this doesn't sound new, and that we've had swivel laptop/tablets for a decade or more, you have to realise, this swivels on a different plane. A DIFFERENT PLANE.

    1. Re:Entirely new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Entirely new! by jittles · · Score: 1

      About damn time, too! I'm sick and tired of having to make sure I book all my travel on Airbus damn it! I want Boeing support!

    3. Re:Entirely new! by vjg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      De Plane! De Plane! I have seen ads for this before and have yet to figure out how it's significantly different from my 4 year-old Fujitsu LifeBook. Oh, wait, it's not as expandable or capable as my LifeBook.

    4. Re:Entirely new! by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Actually there was a convertible from the 90's that used essentially the same mechanism although it didn't carry the outer frame around to the front/top of the screen. I can't remember who made it though.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    5. Re:Entirely new! by LoudMusic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's linked in the article.

      Vadem Clio

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadem_Clio

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    6. Re:Entirely new! by lennier1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Different kind of animal. HP uses a real CPU instead of a toy.

    7. Re:Entirely new! by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 1

      I had the tx2000z for close to 3 years(mobo burned out last month) and it was an awesome machine once you got ubuntu configured on it right. It came with vista and that lasted long enough to download an iso and burn it. Unless they've made significant changes to the tablet control software, it's still going to suck, even having to compile the touchscreen module and update the input devices on every kernel release in ubuntu, it was still better than the windows offering.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    8. Re:Entirely new! by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      No that's not it. The one I remember was older and a real PC made by one of the major manufacturers of the day.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    9. Re:Entirely new! by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      The Vadem Clio was available from 3 different manufacturers --- you're possibly remembering it as the Sharp TriPad.

      Or, you might be thinking of the earlier ThinkPad 360PE which had a similar hinge design.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    10. Re:Entirely new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The HP also breaks if you look at it wrong, wherein you'll be directed to some Indian customer support person who only knows how to read off of a prefab list of problems, charge your credit card several hundreds of dollars and never actually fix anything.

    11. Re:Entirely new! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Do you still have it? That series has a thermal issue with the GPU and can usually be fixed rather easily.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    12. Re:Entirely new! by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're talking about Fujitsu.

    13. Re:Entirely new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Fujitsu, but I have not had anything but problems with any HP product or post buyout Compaq product (pre-HP, Compaq was actually a pretty trustworthy brand).

    14. Re:Entirely new! by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Driver download sites that are more often offline than online, hardware that is crippled by design (like not soldering on all the memory racks a mainboard would support), issuing device-specific IDs yet not trimming down the driver downloads to the stuff that's actually inside (leads to having customers play component bingo when it's time to figure out which network chip is in there), ...
      And it's even "funnier" for middle-sized businesses (crappy business phone support; it takes weeks to be mailed a simple cost estimate for a mere twenty identical workstations, ...).

    15. Re:Entirely new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember an HP computer that my mother bought some years back. I was going to upgrade her video card so that she could play some games and the motherboard didn't even have an AGP slot. Mind, it had a space, leads and controller for an AGP slot, but they didn't even bother to put a 2 cent plastic slot on.

      I've owned two HP laptops, one pre-HP Compaq laptop and one post-HP Compaq laptop. The only one that survived beyond the two year mark without some kind of problem is the pre-HP Compaq. In fact, I still have that Compaq and it still works even after eight years.

      I'm not sure how HP handles business customers, but I know that Dell is fantastic for that. I've ordered hundreds of new systems from them for a company I used to work at and they all arrived on time, at minimal cost and with only a single hard drive out of 350 computers that was DOA. They did a cross ship that very day and I had a new drive by morning. Later on, one of our employees accidentally knocked over a monitor and broke it. Dell replaced it within the week, for no cost even though it was our fault.

  3. Re: Different Plane! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't tell the TSA!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  4. Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Really, they lost me at "full Windows 7". As an OS, the interface is complete crap for use on a tablet. So this is a small netbook that converts into a barely usable tablet. No thanks.

    1. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I wonder... could you run Android in a virtual machine for use as a tablet and Windows 7 or Ubuntu for when you're using it as a laptop? Trying to combine the two form factors is always going to be tricky, given how unwieldy either UI is going to be when using it in the opposite mode. Unless someone comes out with a way to easily switch between the different UI styles as well as the hardware styles I think this is a non-starter.

    2. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I thought everyone agreed that average customer = Web, email, instant messaging, music, maybe movies.

    3. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      There are already touchscreen netbooks, so some people have already been working to get Ubuntu working on them. I think they've tackled a lot of the driver problems, but I imagine that any new hardware like this is going to have its own set of driver issues to tackle (and no manufacturer support). As for Android in a virtual machine, I think you'd just have to run the Android emulator in Eclipse?

    4. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I want in a tablet. This is the biggest turnoff for me with the iPad, being chained to iOS.

      What's important is that a proper interface is running on the device. That was the biggest problem with tablets from 5-8 years ago. They were running straight Windows XP which made for a clumsy experience. But on the other hand, the OS made those tablets quite useful and a viable alternative to a laptop.

      What's important is that a fluid experience is offered when you're using the device as a tablet. The complexity of the OS shouldn't get in the way of the experience. That's what Apple does well. But it's nice to have that extra depth available when I need it.

      Those early PC tablets were generally panned in the media. The same "experts" soiling themselves over the iPad failed to see the potential in those forerunners. Granted, display and touchscreen technology wasn't where it is today. And both Microsoft and those hardware companies, Sony and others, totally missed the boat on providing a proper user experience. But they haven't gotten any credit for breaking ground with tablets.

      The problem now seems to be that PC-makers seem to be afraid of committing to a real tablet and instead are offering these odd half-breed devices. I guess Dell and others feel they're absolved of the expense and effort of designing a proper GUI is they basically market laptops with tablet-style gimmickry. Either that or they're going to sit around waiting for Google to develop a direct knockoff of iOS for tablets. All this means we'll likely never see a proper full-featured tablet.

    5. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder... could you run Android in a virtual machine for use as a tablet ...

      Technically it's just a weird Linux distro. A proper VM would certainly be a step up from what's included in the Android SDK.

    6. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Durr....

      Here's a thought: Try using it.

      Everyone who never has ... bitches about the UI, which is funny as *hell* considering that getting into network settings on an iPad requires selecting a text-line ... just as it would in the windows start menu.

      One has to wonder what touch-capable device you have ever used...if any...to claim "interface" as a fault.

      Do try again, though. It should be quite entertaining.

    7. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Android sales disagree. You said Linux, right?

    8. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What's so crappy about it as a mobile OS?

      Sure, out of the box it's not perfect. But it's easily customizable (as in, built-in settings) to make it better: larger icons, fonts, etc. (as a proportion of the screen) and the like. At the resolution this netbook runs, it should be quite usable.

      In all actuality, Win7 can be customized to work almost identically to how the Maemo 4 UI works. That's a win for me, personally - the Maemo 4 UI is (IMO) one of the quickest usable UIs I've used for a mobile.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already done, and you don't need a VM either.

      http://www.android-x86.org/

    10. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      What's so crappy about it as a mobile OS?

      Sure, out of the box it's not perfect. But it's easily customizable (as in, built-in settings) to make it better: larger icons, fonts, etc. (as a proportion of the screen) and the like. At the resolution this netbook runs, it should be quite usable.

      Think single-mouse-button, and the mocking we all of Macs because of it.

      That's what we have on a touchscreen - a single mouse button design, and wierd hacks to make it actually support middle and right-clicks. Or just right-click, because that's fairly important in the Windows UI experience - it's actually very difficult to use Windows without having right-click available (and it's really clumsy).

      And then the apps aren't optimized for such experiences as well. Hell, even the Windows 7 explorer has stuff hidden wher eyou have to shift-right-click or alt-right-click, making life even more fun. And many other Microsoft apps do the same thing - stuff hidden in right-click menus unless a modifier key is held down.

      MacOS X is also clumsy, but at least you can live without the right-click (the single mouse button forces developers to not hide functionality in context menus because they won't be discoverable and right-clicking isn't a common experience).

      And then there's the apps themselves - most of which are designed for a mouse input device, not a touch based input, so you can easily stick things in menus and require drags, right-clicks, and all sorts of fancy things because the interaction takes place via a keyboard and mouse. Taps take longer and cascading menus or long drags are a huge pain.

    11. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      something like Win7 on Xen?
      As for Android, it's just Google's private branch of the Linux kernel. If they upstreamed more of that into the standard tree switching between android and your favourite desktop distro would be trivial. Hardware sensors detect a 'swivel' and hey presto the UI switches to X11.
      Google's app store might only currently cater to ARM based phones but as Apple have done with an osx store, there'd be a market for x86 tablet apps too.

    12. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I've played with numerous touch based interfaces for years, everything from Wacom on OS X to iOS to Linux kiosks to Android devices to WebOS. I also have done a lot of work as a user interface and usability designer and tester. In my experience, pretty much all of them are superior to Windows 7 for tablets. It's just painful trying to do normal tasks clearly using a hacked on interface that none of the applications have been properly tested and engineered for. Even old versions of MacOS with a tablet at least start with a flexible input strategy that insures app developers don't rely upon multiple mouse buttons for necessary functionality.

    13. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by bazorg · · Score: 1

      I had some reservations about that but then saw in the video demo that there is a change in the UI once you flip from laptop to tablet mode. Instead of Windows Explorer, it changes into a simpler screen with half a dozen large buttons to start a different set of applications. Makes sense. Your word processor is best used with the keyboard and mouse, your photo album can be used comfortably with the touchscreen.
      I like this Dell a lot. I hope it is successful and they start making them with normal laptop components instead of the netbook specifications.

    14. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      android-x86.org

    15. Re:Windows 7 is not a Tablet OS by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      guess what.. you could install Linux on it too ! Maybe there'll even be all the drivers !

      sorry to get in the way of a (good) bad whine.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  5. Apple Sales? by BC_R3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This release will probably hurt both iPad and MacBook sales drastically. Better operating system and the ability to function as both a laptop and a tablet will appeal to a large group people.

    1. Re:Apple Sales? by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Want to place a wager on that? I bet this is the last we ever hear about this (not so new) laptablet. Android and the iPad will eat this shit alive.

    2. Re:Apple Sales? by BC_R3 · · Score: 1

      Would you also like me to bet on Linux coming back?

    3. Re:Apple Sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android, sure. iPad? I think not.

    4. Re:Apple Sales? by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      ... iPad? I think not.

      That's because you're an AC on Slashdot, and live in a strange bubble world where iPods were "lame".

    5. Re:Apple Sales? by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      What does that even mean?

      Wait, was your original post POE?

    6. Re:Apple Sales? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What do you mean coming back?
      It has better than 50% of the server room, runs on most smartphones sold, dell still sells their limited selection of linux machines.

    7. Re:Apple Sales? by digitallife · · Score: 1

      Only a computer geek who has no grasp of what the larger demographic wants would think this. The fact is that the iPad is selling well (4th quarter projections of 15-20 million) because a huge amount of people, who obviously aren't you, really like to use it.

    8. Re:Apple Sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part about Linux running Android is that the userland runs almost entirely in a JVM.

    9. Re:Apple Sales? by danieltdp · · Score: 0, Troll

      Lame? No. Overhiped. Yes. At least IMHO

      --
      -- dnl
    10. Re:Apple Sales? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about this and came to a conclusion: it has less buttons. Normal people don't like buttons. An Ipad has 105 less buttons than a computer, so it should sell like icecream on a summer day

      --
      -- dnl
    11. Re:Apple Sales? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      No. What will hurt the iPad is tablets with equivalent hardware specs, a good OS+basic apps, and none of the closedness of the Apple Harem.

      I'd rather have tablet with an optional keyboard dock, than be forced to carry the keyboard even the 90% of times I have no use for it

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  6. Old Tech by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe all I want is a book and movie player, so I can catchup on old entertainment in my hotel room? Or surf the net? Or stream the radio at work?

    My main beef is the magazine calling this "innovative".
    The laptop which converts to a tablet is nothing new.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:Old Tech by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The innovation is the way it converts to a tablet, not the conversion itself. Rather than the whoe screen swiveling on a single point where it attaches to the body, it's held in a frame, and swiveled vertically.

      It looks to be a bit more reliable and sturdy than the single swivel that's been done before.

    2. Re:Old Tech by Barny · · Score: 1

      Those single swivels are pretty solid tbh, have had mine for over a year now and never had an issue with it (HP TouchSmart).

      Also remember some of the hardiest laptops in the world use them, Panasonics Toughbook range.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:Old Tech by thedarknite · · Score: 1

      It's not so innovative, halfway through the review they reference that this particular design was used in 1999 in the Vadem Clio

      --
      A game has objectives and is competitive, anything else is just play
  7. Soon I will be proven right... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tablet fad will end with small convertible laptops (or "netvertibles" as they're called now).

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're wrong. Tablets will get thinner and lighter, and you'll dock them with keyboards (wirelessly) and larger monitors when you need to. Fewer and fewer people will see the need to buy a desktop or laptop computer.

    2. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're wrong. Tablets will get thinner and lighter, and you'll dock them with keyboards (wirelessly) and larger monitors when you need to. Fewer and fewer people will see the need to buy a desktop or laptop computer.

      That's my prediction too... the laptop is dead, long live the laptop.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by Graff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tablets will get thinner and lighter, and you'll dock them with keyboards (wirelessly) and larger monitors when you need to.

      Basically how people are using the iPad right now. The combination of the iPad + bluetooth keyboards and dock connectors makes it a close replacement for a desktop system for most people.

    4. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's the beginning, although I think it will take a few cheaper android tablets to really get this started -- tablets need to cost less than netbooks to replace them, and they will, in time.

    5. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      And they'll all be locked down.

      Welcome to the world of Trusted Computing!

    6. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or "netvertibles" as they're called now).

      oh sweet jesus. what an obnoxious buzzword. About as lame as 'SmartBook' (what's so 'smart' about it that sets it apart from other netbooks?)

    7. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Yep, because the people that make free open software have their heads up their arses over what most people want from their computing devices. And they certainly seem to lack broad vision about where this is all going in terms of user interaction.

    8. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Arg, I really should have qualified that, there is some great open source software of course.

    9. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It's irrelevant, since the device makers will be the ones to close it. Android is OSS, but that doesn't mean it's open on the devices themselves.

    10. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bingo. If I look at my home computing needs, my iPad basically does everything I need with a dock for a full keyboard. If I didn't need to fire up Netbeans every once in a while and dive into code, it would a replacement for my work computer as well. I have a Mac Mini hooked up to the TV mainly as a media center to watch iTunes movies and shows.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    11. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Cellphone will get larger and thiker and you will dock them on your tablet, wich will get thinner and lighter, wich you will dock on your netbook, wich will get thicker and heavier and you will ... oh crap. I lost myself

      --
      -- dnl
    12. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by linatux · · Score: 0

      cell with fast CPU, *nix-based OS, wireless keyboard & screen. Sit at my desk & start typing. Away from desk - have to pull phone out of pocket. Get home to large screen & k/b - seemlessly back on /.

    13. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's right. Convertible netbooks will also get thinner and lighter, offer the ability to both work and play on one device that needs no additional hardware that is compatible with 99% of all PC OSes and software out there.

    14. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      While I do partially agree with this, there's one fundamental problem:

      How do you use a tablet properly with a PORTABLE external keyboard? Or rather, where do you get a portable keyboard that's sturdy (and heavy!) enough to dock a 7-12" tablet in without having it fall over when placed on a slanted surface, such as lecture hall "desklets" (can't think of the proper word, sorry... living in Germany is ruining my English). Of course, you could just lay both flat on the desk surface, but there's often not enough room for this. Not enough for side by side either, in many cases...

      A clamshell/convertible, on the other hand, holds up the screen by itself. No need for crazy constructions etc... solve this problem and pure tablet devices in combination with external keyboards may become usable in a mobile work context.

      And sure, touchscreen keyboards are fine for some stuff, but taking notes via typing requires tactile feedback, even if only for the reason that you can't look at the keyboard/screen all the time.

    15. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Yep, phones will take a big chunk too, and I suspect they'll work the way you say. But tablets will be popular with people that want a larger screen on a mobile device.

    16. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      You don't get a portable keyboard.

      You can learn to type pretty fast on a virtual keyboard, and it's just not a deal-breaker for most people to have to look at the keyboard (I can't touch type, and I do okay). I've seen people taking notes on iPads at conferences (it actually pretty common). They have the advantage of being completely silent. People just adapt.

    17. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      They will never be as thin and light as a tablet, and I think we've already seen that the dual nature of these things makes for a clunky interfaces.

      The other driving factor will be that a lot of people won't even get a tablet, will just have a phone. It will interface with keyboards and monitors in the same way.

    18. Re:Soon I will be proven right... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Obviously if you can't touch type in the first place, there's nothing much for you to adapt to. Stop trying to bring the rest of us down to your level ;)

  8. even worse than the iPad by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

    though it doesn't do the tablet bit as well as an iPad

    Worse than the iPad? So we can expect a terrible keyboard, terrible text selection, rotation issues, and buggy input controls? Where do I sign up?

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  9. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different from an ASUS Eeepc T91 or T91 MT?

  10. Can it run Linux? by russlar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm dead serious about that. If it will run something I can install KDE onto, I'm sold.

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
    1. Re:Can it run Linux? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I'm dead serious about that. If it will run something I can install KDE onto, I'm sold.

      Of course it can. It's a computer.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Can it run Linux? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      What I want to know if it can run Linux, and then switch to Android in tablet mode. (Or, for me, Windows, and then switch to Android mode, since all my software is Win-centric).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since all my software is Win-centric).

      *points to door*

      Get out.

    4. Re:Can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what he is really referring too is whether linux can use the touchscreen rather than if linux can run on it, which it most definately can. I would also be interested to see if any one has the touch screen working under linux.

    5. Re:Can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm dead serious about that. If it will run something I can install KDE onto, I'm sold.

      Of course it can. It's a computer.

      Never heard of drivers? A lot of sexy hardware won't run Linux for lack of drivers.

    6. Re:Can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use KDE for Windows. It's free, too.

    7. Re:Can it run Linux? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I'm dead serious about that. If it will run something I can install KDE onto, I'm sold.

      As much as I like (and use daily) KDE, I don't see how that would work. When in tablet mode you want 'single-click' actions and plenty of specific gestures (double-finger, flick...) that are not present in KDE. And I don't see how they could be built-in easily. I used a netbook/tablet for a while with Ubuntu netbook edition (or whatever it's called now) and the simplified Gnome interface was better for that purpose. Still there were many defects or missing features that made it far from a convenient Android use. Still, I agree with you, I would want it too. If it worked.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  11. I'll wait for a 7 inch by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    I know that all the "people in the know" say we all only want a 10inch and bigger tablet, but not me. Part of my daily work has me dealing with the iPad and other tablets. I can say that i just dont enjoy the larger formfactor of the iPad. Sure, it is better for web browsing, I will certainly admit that, but I just hate to carry it around.
    For me, I want something about the size of the playbook from RIM. It will still fit in my suit coat pocket or nicely in a hand bag if you are a lady. It's perfect size for reading a book or even a manual. Now, pair that up with say Wi-Fi direct and Bluetooth 4.0 with advanced secure simple pairing for fast document sharing with other tablets and I think you have a good product.
    It should also be able to accept stylus input. This is a MUST for me and I think most in the business word.
    Imagine how much nicer it would be to sit in that meeting when you can lean back in the chair holding your hand size tablet and making notes as you would on paper.

    For me though, the whole problem is the lack of easy sharing of information. I should be able to "flick" my document towards yours and that should be enough. Maybe enter in a 4 digit code, but not more. Until Documents can easily be passed from machine to machine, it will still be a no go. Let's see. It's still interesting times.

    1. Re:I'll wait for a 7 inch by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Galaxy Tab? Comes pretty close

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:I'll wait for a 7 inch by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of that, except the stylus for writing. I can write faster on an iPad than I can with a stylus on glass (or even on paper, if I'm honest). I was hoping the iPad would come in a 7" model.

      Totally agree about the sharing. Physical location is something developers have been ignoring for far too long. I frequently email people documents, even though they're in the same damn room! It's ridiculous.

    3. Re:I'll wait for a 7 inch by icebraining · · Score: 1
    4. Re:I'll wait for a 7 inch by BobSutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'll wait for a 7 inch." That's what she said!

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  12. Tablet Linux distro, libraries for multi-touch? by lullabud · · Score: 1

    Is there a distro of Linux that is designed specifically for multi-touch tablet interfacing?

    One of the greatest points of the iOS devices is that their apps are designed for multi-touch input from the ground up. It would be great to see this idea put onto Linux... multi-touch interfaces built on the same libraries as the keyboard/mouse interfacing apps.

    I guess the underlying questions are are there any GUIs that are being developed for linux with multi-touch for the primary input? And are there any libraries that developers can use to port their interfaces to be primarily multi-touch?

    Since you can boot Android on iOS devices, and there are alternative hardwares like this, it seems like something that would quickly gain a large following. Without something like that I fear that the open alternatives to iOS will drag on and on in half-baked form, never successfully challenging the consistent experience you get on iOS.

    1. Re:Tablet Linux distro, libraries for multi-touch? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Without something like that I fear that the open alternatives to iOS will drag on and on in half-baked form, never successfully challenging the consistent experience you get on iOS.

      Well, there's MeeGo. The biggest thing is making sure that X11 can register and report multitouch events to applications, support for which is coming up rapidly. Of course, multitouch is a patent minefield with Apple patenting certain gestures (!).

      Nothing in Android will be of value since it's all Android-specific interfaces.

    2. Re:Tablet Linux distro, libraries for multi-touch? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but rummors say that Ubuntu is triyng to get there. If gnome helps, maybe someday

      --
      -- dnl
    3. Re:Tablet Linux distro, libraries for multi-touch? by ianare · · Score: 1

      Yes, Meego is specifically designed for smaller screens and has a touch based interface design from the start. It works with current Dell netbooks which probably share a lot with the Duo.

  13. short attention span by serbanp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ""It's rare that Dell breaks new ground in terms of design [...]"

    Really? Despite Apple's noise around its hardware, the only truly innovative design happening in the mobile computing in the last couple of years was the Dell's Adamo. Too bad it didn't take off; I guess that everybody was holding their breath for the overrated ipad so they missed Adamo's launch.

  14. It's the SHIMMER of tablets and laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/61320/saturday-night-live-shimmer-floor-wax

    It's a (too-thick) tablet! No, it's a (too-small) laptop! IT'S BOTH, badly!

    1. Re:It's the SHIMMER of tablets and laptops by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      So your cup is half empty heh!?

      --
      -- dnl
  15. Wow, what an innovative design! by kurokame · · Score: 1

    It's like someone decided to knock off the convertible tablets which have been around for ages now, but had Bloody Stupid Johnson do the hinge design!

    History, know it. Other than another data point on the size-weight-features continuum, this device brings nothing new to the table.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablet_personal_computer#Timeline_of_tablet_PC_history

    1. Re:Wow, what an innovative design! by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Of course, I don't disagree with you about this not being innovative, but still is important

      Sometimes good ideas came on bad moments. Apple proved that the tablet concept was workable. It made people (not geeks) look for this kind of hardware, put it on the map.

      Some of the old ideas should be tried again, because they really got a second chance

      --
      -- dnl
  16. Good try, though it's been done before by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

    Still, sometimes when we try and straddle a fence, we end up falling and hopefully not crushing our genitals against the fence...

    Trying to be two less than stellar devices might make one really shitty one. It's Windows; fail.

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  17. Hybrid by highspl · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a hybrid. When the battery runs down, its gas engine kicks in.

    --
    It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
  18. Go to glasses by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    I love this struggle to become smaller, lighter, more powerful, and we argue over whether or not it will meet everyone's needs. There is no one product that will do it for everyone....yes, even the iPad.

    What about those glasses that can project the monitor image onto the lens while you walk down a busy street and get run over. Would be cool someday to see a touch version of those glasses with people walking while poking themselves in the eyes.

    Others hate the iPad for use outdoors while they sit at the beach reading a book (ok, that's a commercial). Still others think they are cooler than everyone else when they whip out their iPad and start flipping aimlessly through web pages that are all bookmarked.

    Seriously, there are some people where this type of computer will be perfect and others that see no value in it. To each his/her own.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  19. Interesting, but not with Windows. by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can see this as a potential win if you really need a keyboard for some things, but would want the tablet factor for others. This might have been on my wish list last year before I purchased an acer mini-laptop (11.6" Timeline), save for the weak processor.

    I'm torn, as the specks make it look pretty weak for running full Win7, and experience tells me that the touch interface with Windows is going to be a real bear. Still, the dock and ease of having a keyboard for "work" or slate for couch surfing might be nice.

    I guess it will come down to the software, which is where it will ultimately fail. What makes the iPad/Android Tablets so useful is the finger-centric UI. It's what I hated about the older windows phones (which were built for a stylus and very difficult to manipulate with a fat finger).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  20. Compatibility, not price by phorm · · Score: 1

    The problem is that a iDevice connector is not like a computer connector. If you hook up a laptop to an external monitor, then (barring screen resolution differences, and sometimes it has BETTER resolution), the behaviour should be the same between the device's screen and external screen. It's just a monitor, and the laptop doesn't care if you're running Powerpoint or Unreal Tournament, it'll display whatever is on your desktop.

    On an iDevice, an app has to support the external screen. A lot don't, and it's been an issue for awhile. I remember getting an A/V cable for my iPod and being quite disappointed when very few apps supported it. A staff member where I work tried an external display cable for the iPad, and ran into similar issues with varying compatibility between apps, although it supposedly works better if you jailbreak the phone and install some 3rd-party addons...

  21. Actually, you didn't research enough.. by rs1n · · Score: 1, Informative

    You need to do more research. The connector is a measly $29. http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC552ZM/A

    The connector you're referring to works ONLY for keynote a small number of applications. From one of the highlighted reviews: [quote]I teach high school and thought the vga iPad dock connector would allow me to project everything I see while using the iPad, but alas there are severe limitations to which applications will show on the classroom LCD projector. I wish I had known this before purchasing the connector. The Apple Store description says the connector will display slideshows and movies, but I didn't realize that was it...[/quote] Further research (i.e. reading more reviews) indicates that it DOES NOT just redirect video output that normally gets sent to the iPad's screen. So it's actually a ripoff for $29 since it only works for a small number of applications (for now). So unless you ONLY plan to do presentations through keynote, show pictures, or movies, this isn't the device for you. If I want to include a demo of, say, Mathematica in my presentation, or maybe make use of a web page as a quick aside during my talk, tough luck.

  22. Is this well-built? by rs1n · · Score: 1

    One of the problems I often have with electronics whose parts swivel (in particular LCDs) is that over time, the electrical components that have to be wired through the point of swiveling often wears out too fast. I wonder how durable such a machine would be -- hopefully they are as sturdy as an IBM (not Lenovo) Thinkpad.

  23. Prior art by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Okay, different type of screen swivel but Fujitsu Siemens have had one for ages:

    http://gizmodo.com/150000/fujitsu-siemens-lifebook-tablet

  24. Re:ipad is for queers by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Yes, wait a year for some vapourware product that will be 10x better. You could do that for everything you buy. Hell, I'm waiting for a flying car or a jetpack, but I'll have a car while I wait.

    Or get something now which does what you want. Something proven and with software. After all, what use is a computer without software?

    The iPad wouldn't have been a success if Apple had used a different OS to the iPhone. Keeping it similar meant loads of apps and a relatively easy recompile and tweaks to make an existing app take advantage of the iPad's extra facilities.

  25. I'm not a Dell fan... by _0rm_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    But that thing looks sexier than the iPad. First company to make a full sized laptop version has me sold. Bonus points if the hardware is Linux friendly.

    --
    Boredom is bliss.
  26. Comment addendum by _0rm_ · · Score: 1

    As a programmer, something like this would be perfect for working on the go. However, the specs really don't seem like they will fulfill the needs I have (I do alot of work with OpenGL).

    --
    Boredom is bliss.
  27. Clio by Max+Night · · Score: 1

    "It’s smoother and quicker than the only similar system I’ve tried, a Vadem Clio smart netbook from 1999." Still have one of them. But it wasn't a netbook by any stretch. It was a slammin CE tablet.

  28. Tablets are productive for my non-art job. by postermmxvicom · · Score: 1

    I have a convertible tablet pc and it is wonderful for replacing chalkboards. I have a wireless projector that I connect to and I run onenote. I can write on my tablet as I would on a board, only it is infinitely better that writing on a board. I have a full selection of colors and tools always ready. I can copy and paste. I can search through old notes as if they were typed. If the students are confused about something I wrote we can go back and check it (and see if I made a mistake - instead of getting into a ego battle about who's right).

    If you have ever tried to work out algebra/calculus/geometry problems on a computer vs paper - you know paper is better. Not so with a tablet. It brings all the advantages of paper and none of it's drawbacks. It is great for a large section of the public. Windows 7 even has a tool that you can write down math formulas and it will interpret them as math to insert somewhere. That's miles better for many than learning latex or some markup or whatever.

    I only use my tablet for working out physics and math problems. I use onenote. There is finally a computer which replaces paper. It is this. IMO - get a convertible tablet. Get one with dual digitizers. Make sure the active digitizer is pressure sensitive. Turn on pressure sensitive ink in onenote and select an ink thick enough to notice. And watch the number of problems you work out on paper go to zero and enjoy having the text of your handwritten notes searchable as if it were text. Enjoy the color. Enjoy the productivity. Enjoy it. /rant

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
  29. one last thing by postermmxvicom · · Score: 1

    I can walk around the room while I write on the board....I am free from being shackled!!!

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
  30. Re: Different Plane! by gholder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can just use the laptop to hide your junk while going through the new scanners. Let be real, that's all that anything Dell produces is good for.

  31. Ya know what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a PC that can run two operating systems simultaneously. No, I aint talking virtual machines. I want the ability to have my Debian system running for general use, but have the other half of the system dedicated to Windows for my games. Given that my next desktop system will have at a minimum 4 (possibly 6) cores, this isn't such an unreasonable request.

  32. Re: Different Plane! by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    Actually, Dell also has a division for real products... I haven't yet used a Dell Precision series device I didn't like. Hell, objectively they're nearly on par with Thinkpads, and all that keeps me from buying one is personal preference...

  33. Linux ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

    OK, someone needs to ask this, because that's exactly the kind of netbook/tablet I've been waiting for for years, except for the fact that it runs Windows. Usually Dell products handle Linux pretty well (on my Latitude E6410 I only had to fiddle the microphone). So how well does Linux run on that thing ? In particular Ubuntu Netbook edition (or whatever it's called now)...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?