Slashdot Mirror


P2P Litigation Crippled In DC District Court Ruling

An anonymous reader writes "In a stunning defeat for the US Copyright Group, DC District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer is forcing copyright holders to sue only those over whom the DC court has personal jurisdiction. The USCG has sued in the DC court more than 4,500 people on behalf of a German producer that created the Far Cry movie. But the Judge is having none of that; in her ruling [Friday], Judge Collyer stated that only those who are in the DC court's jurisdiction can be sued — shrinking what could have been a windfall of defendant's cash to perhaps a mere trickle."

7 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Now if only they ask for proof. by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Civil, not criminal. Preponderance of evidence - IOW, "more likely than not" - is the standard.

  2. Re:Protection from copyright infringement? by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Informative

    You'll still be showing as "offering it for download", you just won't be actually allowing the download to take place.If you want to be truly safe, stick to Rapidshare and... the old way. The other thing. That Which We Do Not Mention. Because it's also download-only.

  3. Re:End of the world! by rrkbogie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rosemary is actually a dude who sits on the bench in drag. She legally changed her name back before Clinton nominated her. Some say she was nominated because of a connection to Vince Foster.

    This seems unlikely, given that she graduated from a Catholic University:

    http://www.trinitydc.edu/admissions/profiles/mayerscollyer68.html

  4. Re:Far Cry? by stms · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stop Uwe Boll Now. Don't wait until you or a loved one accidentally sees one of his movies.

  5. Re:Far Cry? by windcask · · Score: 2, Informative

    He already said that it's been too long since that petition has started, and he wouldn't stop even if they got the signatures now. The fact is, he's just not that popular.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uwe_boll#Petition_to_retire

  6. "Crippled"? "Stunning defeat"? by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, you do know that a 12(b)(2) dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is not a dismissal with prejudice or on the merits? They can simply refile this elsewhere, without the new judge being bound by this dismissal. 12(b)(2) motions are procedural, and don't reach the actual case.

    1. Re:"Crippled"? "Stunning defeat"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Uh, you do know that starting your post in such a condescending manner makes your actual message less likely to be received?