Slashdot Mirror
Thought-Controlled Apps On Android May Not Be Far
Julie188 writes "A small PC device company wants to bring thought-controlled apps to the Android market. Mind Technologies (once known by the cute name of Jedi Mind) has promised to make it so. Mind Technologies makes PC devices (a game controller and mouse) that work with the strange-but-true Emotiv headset. Emotiv uses brain waves to operate machines. Although it sounds far fetched, electroencephalogram (EEG) controllers do work, but the products on the market so far are not as easy to use, let alone master, as their makers claim."
than a bluetooth douche tag
it would be the other way around, apps that control your thoughts...
Obligatory: This isn't the Android you're looking for
concentrating *really* hard be equal to sudo?
If I were a pessimist, I would make some comment about how this could enable an app to listen in on your thoughts without your knowing, like a keylogger. Then I would probably add something about combining that with the GPS tracking available in most Android phones and possibly include a reference to the Thought Police.
As it is, I welcome our new thought-controlled overlords/underlings?
Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
What do you think I'm thinking right now?
The CB App. What's your 20?
As evidenced by 3D televisions which are hamstrung by the special glasses requirement, any technology that requires the user to wear a special device on his head without a truly convincing benefit will simply die off.
I have heard of new technologies that can sit in your pocket or attach to a console and read the aura of a person. Since a person's aura is altered by their mental state, this could be a good replacement for the EEG-like devices. And since the aura-readers require direct contact with the person's hand or extremely close proximity like the person's breast pocket, it doesn't have the problem of picking up auras of people nearby by accident.
I'm not sure why this would be relegated to Android, though. These devices can be installed in any device that supported the necessary port (USB, BT, etc).
Emotive uses brain waves to operate machines.
When my computer is screaming, "Porn, porn . . . and more porn!"
"Oh, it must be a problem with the new mouse, that is about to go meet its maker."
"Where's my hammer . . . ?"
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
EEG-based brain-computer interfaces work fine, but there are definite physical limits to what you can do with them.
You absolutely cannot "read thoughts" with EEG. It is not possible, it will almost certainly never be possible. This is a physical limitation due to being on the outside of the skull. The one and only thing EEG picks up is the amount of electrical activity in that general region. Sensitivity and signal-to-noise and environmental noise rejection will place further limitations since they will be somewhat lower on even a good consumer unit. Particularly if you don't want to shave your head before use.
Now, if you realize that, if you respect the limits, you can still do some pretty cool stuff. It's not that hard to make a computer interface based on using an EEG to pick up a P300 response that is absolutely world-changing for people without the physical capacity to use something else. Devices like this have been in research for a bejesus long time now, and the only reason you don't see more use of things like the Emotiv headset for this purpose is that people with that sort of physical limitation generally can't put on the fancy brain-reading hat. (Researchers are currently working on a single-surgery implanted version which will stay in place for decades, so that won't be a problem forever.)
But is this practical for everyday use? Well, for some things. For a smartphone interface, probably not - particularly for more effective headsets like Emotiv which use saline electrodes. The input afforded by an EEG-based interface is very low for a portable device with a smartphone's use scenarios. However, it could be a good secondary form of control for complex systems (starting with games), particularly if it's relegated to things like biosensing for biosensing's sake or mode switching. You can use it for direct input, and humans will learn VERY fast how to work it...but it's not really physically capable of providing the same level of direct input affordances that other methods could. Expecting it to do so is just not very realistic and shows a lack of understanding of the limitations of the physical processes involved.
Apple has had mind control for years... just look at their army of fanboys.
Thought control has been built into iOS for a long time.
How else would you explain this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dikaQjMO388
This is probably good news for people who are paralyzed, since this gives their 'third eye' an ability to use and can render it to be universally acceptable. Although I don't know if it could be what I'm thinking or not.
What am I thinking?
You think so, do you?
Wait until you find out what the intelligence community has really been up to.
Hint: those flu shots in Africa aren't for the kids' health./p
We were going to order some of these for the development of our recommendation system called "Smart Player" which is a phone app. But, the people at emotiv don't take payment through anything but paypal which is a problem for a University. "Just put the money in an anonymous paypal account".
Cutting eedge vaporware is still vaporware.
Well, that's awkward. Who wants to be the one to tell OCZ that the product that they have released to market is vaporware? (Shotgun not me.)
"Thought-Controlled" may be a bit of a stretch.
How about Mindlessly Manipulated?
The slashdot summary is incorrect. Emotiv is made by a rival company, not by (formerly) Jedi mind. Also, Emotiv seems to recognize facial expressions, not read brain signals. So, there's some confusion here.
You have to think in Russian. Do you think you can do that?
... should of course be Firefox.
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
Quite a few of the posts here look like they were the result of a thought inspired app........only problem is they haven't quite got the hang of it yet.
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
If you believe in telekinesis, raise my hand.