Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Trio Lose Appeal

nk497 writes "Three of the four founders of The Pirate Bay have lost an appeal against their conviction last year of helping to share copyrighted material. It wasn't a total waste of time, however. The three have had their one-year jail sentences cut to between four and ten months. (The fourth founder was too ill to appear in court, and will appeal separately.) The foursome also had their fine bumped from 32 million kronor ($4.5 million) to 46 million kronor ($6.5 million)."

9 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Welcome to Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Profiting from the support of copyright infringement.

  2. Still standing by Robadob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet the pirate bay still stands tall. We best start ordering some of those tshirt they advertise to help pay their fine.

  3. Re:Welcome to Sweden by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However that may be, just blatantly disregarding the law is not the solution. At least not in this case.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  4. Re:Excuse me Sir, I'm lost... by mr100percent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's a false analogy. Are you telling me that the founders of Pirate Bay are completely oblivious that their site mainly trafficked in copyright materials? Your analogy would be more apt if you were giving directions to where to find a drug dealer, or the people looking for a convenience store had a ski mask on and guns in hand.

  5. Re:Excuse me Sir, I'm lost... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is knowing where a drug dealer can be found a crime?

  6. Re:Welcome to Sweden by the_womble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tend to be instinctively law abiding, but I think its very clear that if the law is sufficiently widely disregarded it will become unenforceable.

  7. Re:Excuse me Sir, I'm lost... by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not a police officer, nor in most places am I required to report non-violent crimes.

    On moral grounds I would not report drug dealers anymore than prostitutes or homosexuals in the military. I also will not report those hacking devices they own for fun or profit. What police state do you live in?

  8. Re:Excuse me Sir, I'm lost... by irishPete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Knowing is one thing, running a service that tracks where they are and gives directions to them might be a little different...

    --
    disk? hmmm... I know I saw it somewhere...
  9. Re:Welcome to Sweden by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By widespread breaking of the law you are only proving the point that current laws need better enforcement and bigger punishments.

    You're an oppressive government's wet dream, every time they impose another unjust law you just say "it's still the law" and obey it. Widespread breaking of the law probably means democracy is being circumvented and that politicians are lobbied or bought off to prevent the law from changing. Why would then stopping what you're doing change anything? It just means that those that want to suppress them has scored a massive victory and will continue to marginalize the need for change. You show a charming naivity when it comes to how most change comes about. Wnen people wanted to legalize gay sex, do you think it was like "So we've never done it seeing as we obey the law and all, but we think it maybe would be a nice change."? If so, I have a bridge to sell you. Enough breaking of the law has changed many laws like prohibition for example. Maybe it's not our "moral high ground" way of winning, but it works.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings