Slashdot Mirror


President Obama On Mythbusters Tonight

elrous0 writes "As was previously reported, President Obama mentioned back in October that he would be appearing on an upcoming episode of the popular Discovery Channel series Mythbusters. Well, the episode is finally airing tonight. In the episode, the President helps Jamie and Adam test the 'Archimedes Death Ray' myth for a 3rd time (the myth having been 'busted' the first time, and that bust surviving a challenge from MIT students the second time out). Though the President only appears in a couple of brief scripted segments, the actual test (using 500 schoolkids doubling as mirror-bearing soldiers) is purportedly pretty interesting."

9 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. First Post? by Karna99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So do they test it on him ?

  2. Hope and Change? by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Busted!

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  3. Re:Real myth busted by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: How can you tell someone's a libertarian without asking?

    A: They'll tell you.

  4. Re:Well, I *was* looking forward to watching this. by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it odd that The Discovery Channel would get access to the President and use their huge publicity opportunity to... rehash a myth they've already debunked twice. What?

    The only possible reason to use this particular myth is so you can get 500 kids involved, each holding a mirror, and maybe involving the kids directly in the science, plus a little time with a few celebrities, will help associate science with coolness. I mean, it's an easy and pretty safe myth from the kids' perspectives. Hold a mirror, aim reflection at ship a safe distance away, hope for it to start smoking and burst into flames.

    I dunno, though, it just seems like they could have done something new (at least new to the show) that would be just as engaging. Like debunking the professor's use of coconuts to power a radio on Gilligan's Island or something.

    Adam: "So, as you can see, stirring the solution in 5 coconuts didn't work. Busted."
    Jamie: "Agreed. Busted. So what are we testing next?"
    Barak: [walks on stage]"Wait a minute. We can't stop here, can we? Don't we need to scale it up?"
    Jamie: "Sure, normally, but how do we scale this one up?"
    Adam: "It'll take the output of 500 coconuts! Where are we going to find enough people to build and operate hundreds of coconut batteries? It's impossible!"
    Barak: "Fortunately, I brought a few friends along to help out. C'mon out, kids!"
    [cue 500 schoolkids]
    Barak, Jamie, and Adam: "SCIENCE!"

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  5. Wheres Kari? by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who cares, wheres Kari?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. Re:That sounds terrible... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Funny

    What better way to get people excited about science by showing a man a lot of people respect excited about it?

    OK, that's a good argument. So, why is Obama on the show?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  7. Re:Well, I *was* looking forward to watching this. by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

    We already know the President likes a human backdrop: soldiers, doctors, union members... you get the idea.

    Wouldn't a backdrop of 500 kids be great? 500 kids holding mirrors, cackling gleefully as they accidentally ignite the President and his teleprompter.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  8. Re:get off my iLawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe challenging the claim that the current administration is going to help save money with Obamacare? (Busted?)

    I've never gotten why we call it ObamaCare. It was basically written by conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans (how long was it Max Baucus held up the bill in his committee until Republicans in the committee agreed to it?) But the CBO analysis was that it would help save money. And the only way to bring down the debt in the long term is to bring in more health care funding and reduce spending as much as possible. So we can at least say it was a decent attempt. Hopefully we can improve on it in the coming years.

    Maybe challenging Obama's claim of a more transparent administration...maybe they really DO have legislation online for us to look at before they vote on it like he promised. (Busted?)

    Is the Obama administration more transparent than previous ones? Yes. Is it ultra-see-through transparent? No.

    Most legislation is online before they vote on it. And has been for a while. Not that Presidents have any power over that.

    >Maybe looking into the myth that Bush and others spent more than he has, yet somehow the national debt is already about doubled what it was for the Bush crew this early in Obama's presidency?

    Have you ever thought about falling tax receipts because of the recession? Spending could remain constant while receipts fall, sending deficits skyrocketing. This is partly the case - tax receipts have fallen, the government had to pay out more unemployment benefits (never mind the extensions), etc. But yeah. The Bush tax cuts are still in effect. The giant, gaping unfunded hole Bush left in Medicare is still intact. The wars Bush started are still going on. So yes, much of the deficit is still directly attributable to Bush and the Republicans. Now with Obama, we have the stimulus package, which consisted almost entirely of tax cuts and aid to the states, which were spending less money. So really, it was an increase in unfunded government expenditures while total state+federal spending remained flat. And then there's ObamaCare, which is funded. So, yeah, sounds like most of the deficit/debt problems are not Obama's fault.

    Maybe look at the myth that Obama and Co. were going to stop the wars?

    Anyone who thought Obama was going to pull out all troops on day one was a tool ignorant of international politics.

    Maybe investigate the myth that Obama really *is* different than his predecessor(s) and not just a product of the media, and is just as beholden to the corporate entities that fund them as any of the other politicians?

    Corporations have undue influence on government, but they're hardly the masters of poor government puppets. I know it's a popular canard, but it's just not true.

    Is Obama different? Nope, he's a thorough moderate. 30 years ago he would have been called a conservative.

  9. Re:Well, I *was* looking forward to watching this. by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, it's so annoying to hear Obama-teleprompter jokes. Especially since they're from formerly disinterested morons who never realized that all politicians use them for speeches anyway. "But-but-he stutters and sounds like an idiot without one!" Remember the Presidential debates where he kicked the crap out of McCain 3-0 without one, or the open questions session with the House Republicans where he made the whole caucus look like buffoons (enough so that they publicly wished they hadn't done it)? After listening to polished PR-approved answers that provide no insight, I at least appreciate a President who tries to answer questions however much I might disagree with him.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!