Slashdot Mirror


RIP, SunSolve

Kymermosst writes "Today marks the last day that SunSolve will be available. Oracle sent the final pre-deployment details today for the retirement of SunSolve and the transition to its replacement, My Oracle Support Release 5.2, which begins tomorrow. People who work with Sun's hardware and software have long used SunSolve as a central location for specifications, patches, and documentation."

66 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. Re:hmm by Shikaku · · Score: 5, Funny

    [ ] Confirmed by Netcraft

  2. Re:so what? by JonySuede · · Score: 4, Interesting

    sun hardware fuel the first dot.com revolution
    the fact that sun solve died means something to some of the hardcorest nerd so I consider that it is revelant

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  3. Memo to employees. by copponex · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is I, Ellison of Larry.

    I am communicating from my iPad device on my yacht, which is constructed out of the carcasses of a thousand dead corporations. As I recline on my chaise-lounge and ponder your meaninglessness as I wait for the completion of my moon base, I want to assure you that the rumors stating that the turnip is almost dry are simply untrue. I have rebranded it as Oracle Turnip and raised the price by 10,000% for all of our hapless clients who are locked into the platform. Everything will be just fine.

    Signed,
    The One who is more magnificent than your greatest conception of God

    1. Re:Memo to employees. by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Signed,
      The One who is more magnificent than your greatest conception of God (but wearing girl's kimono)

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:Memo to employees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know; Oracle rebranded and unbundled a particular product that was a free part of the base OS until recently, and just quoted a (large) company already locked in to using it a million dollars (minus epsilon) for the licensing and support for 3 years.

      Multiply by (probably several thousand enterprise users of that software suite)...

      It may not be Larry posting here *cough* but a lot of customers feel like turnips right now.

    3. Re:Memo to employees. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What exactly was this product?

      I have not been doing sun stuff for years, so I really am wondering.

    4. Re:Memo to employees. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Signed, The One who is more magnificent than your greatest conception of God

      You're not the real Larry Ellison, you're an imposter.

      You're right. Those extra 11 words were a dead giveaway. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Memo to employees. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing s/he's talking about Xen (Sun xVM), but then s/he uses the term "softwware suite," so I'm not sure. Maybe Solstice DiskSuite, but I thought that was already unbundled.

    6. Re:Memo to employees. by angus77 · · Score: 2

      chaise-lounge

      It's chaise longue, bozo -- as in long chair.

      You didn't get the memo. Larry's had the spelling changed. You're expected to have migrated already.

    7. Re:Memo to employees. by armanox · · Score: 1

      StarOffice.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    8. Re:Memo to employees. by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      chaise-lounge

      It's chaise longue, bozo -- as in long chair.

      Crikey! Furniture Nerds!

  4. Was long gone by carnalforge · · Score: 1

    together with the (mostly proffessional and helpful) people that were working behind.

    --
    :wq!
  5. my orcale suppor sucks by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Oracle support sucks, the damn thing is flash, you can't reply via email only by logging back in and trying to use it. It fails quite often and loses anything you typed in. Plus they do anything to avoid calling you.

    It is the worst support portal I have ever seen.

    1. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes... But it's "industry leading" all over now!

      --
      Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
    2. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And every Oracle DBA on the planet says "Well duh, but it's better than what we had..."

      I was told a story by a DBA (around 2002) that in order to place a support question to Oracle they had to do the following:

      1) Type the question into a text file. It had to be in MS-DOS format.
      2) Tar and gzip the question. It had to have the extension .tgz - tar.gz would not be accepted.
      3) Upload the question via a support forum on their website. You could not e-mail the question.
      4) Wait 3-5 business days for a response. If after no response after 5 days you could then submit another request asking what happened to the first request. It had to be in a .tgz as well.

      For the hundreds of thousands of dollars we paid in licensing fees, I was dumbstruck. I believe the only thing I could say was "but, but, but..."

      Bye bye Sun. It was nice knowing you.

    3. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the quadruple ROT-13 requirement.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2

      This is true. Unless your company happened to employee an Oracle DBA who happened to be a former Oracle employee, that is. I learned a lot from that guy, though.

    5. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      grrr..."to employ"

    6. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by syousef · · Score: 1

      My Oracle support sucks, the damn thing is flash, you can't reply via email only by logging back in and trying to use it. It fails quite often and loses anything you typed in. Plus they do anything to avoid calling you.

      It is the worst support portal I have ever seen.

      I can fix that for you. Buy a Dell laptop. It is now the second worst you've seen.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by gtirloni · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you think MSC and SunSolve you great apps right?

      --
      none
    8. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by Snorbert+Xangox · · Score: 1

      You obviously never used the Sun Member Support Center. Getting a report on your installed base felt like one of those children's book with the 45rpm record that would read a few words to you and then play a xylophone note when you should turn the page:

      20 rows of results... ding! Turn the page!
      Another 20 rows... ding!
      Losing will to live... ding!

      ...with no apparent way to export the data as a big file. Wow, who would have thought that the big future of computing was somebody copying and pasting rows of data from a #$)@ Web app.

      If only Sun had spent less time on all their zero-revenue "Project [some fancy name]" boondoggles, and more on Project Let's Not Piss Off Our Existing Customers.

      --
      -Snorbert, somewhere in the antipodes
    9. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      Bye bye Sun. It was nice knowing you.

      Are there ANY Sun shops left out there? Who are they selling to???

      Moving away from Sun/Solaris is so easy now.

    10. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Enterprise, mostly.
      It's great hardware, and mostly resides in midrange and up.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by ti1ion · · Score: 1

      Yes there are.

      They sell to companies run by older, conservative managers, such as banks and other established companies (think essential service providers, for example). These people still think Linux is some crazy, unproven, security hole ridden toy not ready for the enterprise. Many of them have not kept up with tech for 30 years and believe anything they are told by salespeople. Oh, and many of them hate IBM (the good old days, you know).

      I've tried to move my company away from Sun hardware and was shot down every time.

    12. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Having used both... nope, the Oracle one is somehow worse.

    13. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by dogsbreath · · Score: 2

      Obviously they have their heads stuck in the sand. Data center footprint issues alone make it cost friendly to move off of Sun. Given how much now runs on IBM or Intel chips and given the maturity of Linux, there really is no reason not to and lots of positives for getting rid of Sun.

      I will say this though, IMHO, Solaris is still a far better industrial strength o/s than Linux. This is an opinion based on years of work with both. Solaris' i/o handling, network stack, scheduler, stability, and transparency of upgrades are superior to Linux across the board.

      But Linux works, and it works well. And there are no problems with Linux that cannot be dealt with one way or another. And there's no bullshit. And I can run it on the best h/w. Sun h/w sucks. I know this is a troll statement but I have worked with Sun h/w for 20 yrs and the current offerings are outdated, relatively poor performing and power hungry. And heavy. And ugly.

      Virtualization choices and functionality are better with Linux, and that is the number one issue today.

      The only place I would use Sun h/w today is for either web or dns services. The T servers running Solaris really kick butt for high network connectivity, highly parallel internet services.

    14. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oracle has some really intriguing products, but they've raised arrogant indifference to their customers to an art form. For years their attitude toward tech support was that if their wonderful product bites you on the ass, it must be because you aren't smart enough to use it. And of course we all know about their byzantine licensing models which they're all too happy to let customers trip over, after which they are not at all inclined to extend a helpful hand.

      What drives this is a sense of entitlement; a belief that you *have* to use Oracle's products that they've successfully foisted on many of their customers because most people in this world are apparently incapable of critical thought.

      In truth Oracle products do have many useful and unique features, but as a designer I'd be chary of relying on those features because if you are an Oracle customer, Oracle isn't your friend. Of course no vendor is *really* your friend, but Oracle in particular is a vendor you can't trust because they don't care if they do something that makes you hate them, provided they've got you locked in.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by ti1ion · · Score: 1

      You said that better than I could, and I agree with you. Tellingly, your comments regarding virtualization bear out precisely what is happening in my organization today.

    16. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by bolthole · · Score: 1

      Good news for you:

      https://supporthtml.oracle.com/

      no joke. Under-advertised, but actually works.

    17. Re:my orcale suppor sucks by sysjkb · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, you don't have to use the flash-based support site. If you go to http://supporthtml.oracle.com/ , you get the HTML-based version, which is much more user friendly.

  6. Oracle is pure evil. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oracle loves to destroy a good thing, don't they?

    Back in the old days you could simply FTP anonymously to sunsolve.sun.com to download Solaris patches. It worked great; you could do it from the command line, no need for a browser or logins or anything like that.

    Heck, I remember setting up Enterprise 250s using serial consoles, and FTPing to sunsolve to download the patch clusters, then installing them.

    Nowadays not only do you need a web browser and an account, but you can't get patches at all without an expensive support contract. And on top of that, when we got our support contract they screwed things up and didn't even give us the proper permissions to get our patches. It took a *MONTH* of wrangling to get them to fix their festering pile of shit.

    I miss you, Sun Microsystems. Oracle is the devil. We won't be buying any more Sun/Oracle hardware from this point forth, that's for sure.

    1. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nowadays not only do you need a web browser and an account, but you can't get patches at all without an expensive support contract.

      To be fair, that happened before Oracle acquired Sun.

    2. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

      I miss Sun too. I never thought I'd admit this, but HPUX is a pretty decent UNIX after all. Too much Solaris/SPARC koolaid for too many years, but I'm recovering.

      --
      Organization? You must be joking..
    3. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I got my start on SunOS, then Solaris and IRIX. When I went professional, I spent years on HP-UX and AIX. I played a tiny bit with various *BSDs and even NextStep in there as well. HP-UX is a fine OS, and even has some advantages over Solaris. Between the two, I'd probably choose Solaris in a perfect world and HP-UX in a compromise world, but in a practical world, Linux, not HP-UX is going to replace Solaris.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      I believe the proper term is "Oracular Vision-Aid."

    5. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by timbo234 · · Score: 1

      Nowadays not only do you need a web browser with a modern version of Flash and an account, but you can't get patches at all without an expensive support contract.

      FTFY

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    6. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by portwojc · · Score: 1

      Honestly any company that buys another always wants to get rid of the old ways. No matter how well they worked. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

    7. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow. Given how bad things eventually got for Sun you would have thought that Oracle would want to look after the remaining paying customers, wouldn't you?

    8. Re:Oracle is pure evil. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      I logged into the mess we knew as Slashdot to point out that very same thing. Sun went to the stupid "web portal for everything!" setup way before they were gobbled up by Oracle. It sucked then, and it *really* sucks now.

      Oracle just turned the suck knob to 11.

  7. Re:so what? : Get your patches now!!! by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, go download all the patches you can, because knowing Oracle, you won't be able to afterward. I'm personally grabbing the last releases of Solaris 10 (Sparc and X86), as well as the latest recommended patch sets, the last OpenBoot Prom for my Sparc system, and the latest Sun/Oracle Compilers and their associated patches. With all the changes Oracle has been making putting all this further and further behind paywalls tied to their support contracts (without which according to some interpretations, you can't even upgrade the OS release revision past what came with your system anymore, unlike Sun's attitude where if you bought a sparc box, you can run any version as long as the architecture is still on the supported list).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  8. The Oracle Store sucks too... by DorkFest · · Score: 4, Informative

    I ordered a couple of spare drive modules for some Sun X4540's I manage. I used the online store at Oracle.com It took a month to get the parts for one, and two, when I tried to get updates on the order, they never could connect me to the right people. I always ended up getting connected to some place in India who told me they were the wrong people to talk to. They gave me the "correct" number, which connected me back to the people who connected me to India in the first place, who connected me to India again. You see the vicious cycle. I ended up emailing store@sun.com and someone finally figured out WTF was going on. Oracle, eat a plate of dick. You suck.

  9. A moment of silence, please by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is no longer the beginning of the end - it's rapidly approaching the 'fat lady sings' point in time. Sunsolve's demise is one of the last nails in the coffin.

    We're a big Sun customer in a city of many big sun customers. We have tried hard to work with Oracle, but when they say that our division in the company will have its applications software maintenance (Apps _only!_ No hardware, no OS support) increased by nearly $4M/year, it very quickly becomes time to look at alternatives. We have two years to divest ourselves of all Sun/Oracle solutions, and with the extra cost of OS licensing (not support!) on non-Oracle hardware (I believe $1500/socket/year to install Solaris on third party gear), the incentive to run a superior OS fades. In two years, I suspect that we'll have gone from >90% Sun/Oracle gear running Solaris to 30%, and it'll only be that high because of the inertia shift required to replace 500+ servers.

    TO be fair, Jonathan Schwartz killed Sun before Larry ponied up the cash, but Oracle had a choice to rebuild the Sun brand, and chose to go the other way instead.

    I just wish I'd remembered to grab the latest patch bundles today--they may not be available tomorrow.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:A moment of silence, please by turtleshadow · · Score: 2

      We are in the process of sunsetting all SUN branded equipment for vendors other than Oracle. Its taken over 6 months to renew some contracts and expended far too many cycles & was so painful for us to be worth it to do it again.

      For us as a customer its obvious that its a circus inside.

      Oracle has chopped off those that used to resell SUN support and service at the knees. These were the guys that would go the extra mile for us, their local customers, yet were told by the great Oracle to take a hike as Oracle would do it better. Apparently we are not worthy of a gov sector sales call back for the EOL boxes we are looking to shelve at this point next year.

      We are neither big nor tiny but do a lot of .gov.. I remember cutting my teeth in univ on both IBM & SUN equipment; that led to favorable sales when I entered the industry. I'll miss SUN so much .

      On the bright side I hope a bunch of good ex-SUN or ex-IBM or ex whoever people are working hard to bury their former companies who make decisions because of investor avarice not because of in house innovation and genius.

    2. Re:A moment of silence, please by gtirloni · · Score: 1

      If Oracle isn't rebuilding Sun, I don't know what it's doing. MSC and SunSolve were the worst websites I've even seen in my life. MOS isn't great but it's much better. The patch bundles have always been available only to paying customers. What's your point? What a bunch of crap.

      --
      none
    3. Re:A moment of silence, please by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      True as that may be, the replacement is even worse. It require flash for gods sake. How can Oracle be so fucked up?

      I think it went like this.

      Sun support: Well, our current support website sucks. It is in fact the worst support site I can possible imagine.
      Oracle developer: Ha, I can beat that. (Implements new hell site in flash).
      Sun support: Ok you win, our old site was not the worst possible support site. Now let's get a beer while we listen to our (Soon to be ex) customers scream.

    4. Re:A moment of silence, please by bolthole · · Score: 1
  10. Re:Memo to ..er.. You're the real Larry Ellison by dkalley · · Score: 1

    chaise-lounge

    It's chaise longue, bozo -- as in long chair.

    Your argument is about two hundred years too late, English speakers haven't said long chair in a long time. It is lounge as in lazy.

  11. Re:so what? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Ironic ain't it that you can buy Sun Ray Thin Clients for less than $20 now with free shipping. But I'll probably get hate for saying it but Sun deserved to die. Lets be honest folks they have been flailing around with no real business plan or clue for longer than most would like to admit. One day they were "yay Linux!" the next "Linux boo!" one day "yay SPARC" the next "X86 roxorz!". At least with oracle buying them Solaris and SPARC will continue, and will actually probably gain some share.

    My prediction is that Oracle setting a new DB record is a sign of what is to come: Oracle will offer a customized SPARC running a highly tweaked Solaris with both made from the ground up to maximize Oracle DB TPM. For smaller companies they will offer an "Oracle Cloud" solution where you can have Oracle host the DB and get crazy TPM without having to have the crazy hardware, and for the larger enterprises they will have a combo cloud/offline solution where you can host it all with them, all on site, or any combo you desire.

    As much as the FLOSS guys want to cuss at Oracle, even they should be willing to admit old Larry knows how to make a ROI, and honestly they should be thanking their lucky stars as it could have been MUCH worse. Imagine if some patent troll would have bought out Sun. It would have made the SCO mess look like a Sunday tea party with all the patents they had. And the GPL still says you can have the code, just not the patents and copyrights. So I really don't get all the Oracle hate around here. Sure they're not throwing their weight behind FLOSS but you know what? why should they, Oracle isn't Red hat. And frankly I don't see the FLOSS community being big Oracle customers anyway.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  12. why bother by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    I have long worried about stuff like this and ended up with a basement and a loft full of redundant old crap nobody is interested in anymore. In five years time, all you will have is some old sun boxes that have been surpassed by who knows what new hardware the future brings. Why is that? Because within one year, competitors computers will be so much cheaper to buy and get support for that replacing sun boxes will be cheaper than maintaining them. You're flogging a dying horse trying to get a few "free" more steps out of it before you'll have to pay for them. Sell the horse while it's still walking, and buy something not cursed with the money you get for your hardware.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  13. You could just NFS mount sunsolve by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    How's that for "the web is the computer", mister Ellison?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  14. My Whatever by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    Why do companies insist on calling things "My Oracle Support" or "MySpace" or "My Whatever". It just sound so childish. "SunSolve" sounds like a tool which will actually help you solve stuff, "My Oracle Support" sounds like a helpdesk where some idiot asks me which version of Windows is running on my Solaris server or if I tried rebooting my Mainframe yet.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:My Whatever by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Well I think the idea behind it from a marketing perspective is to make people feel like its a sort of concierge service and it will be catered directly to them. The thing is with big high dollar enterprisy type stuff is I don't want it to feel that way, I expect it to be that way. A little personal attention and a prompt response is not much to ask for considering the dollars attached to many of these support contracts.

      I agree with you My Whatever makes me think I am calling some generalized helpdesk. I want to talk to a professional who can help solve my problem, and BTW Oracle, you are not HP you don't also sell consumer stuff, if we are are calling you we know what are problem *is* we actually need help fixing it not identifying it, skip the first level crap please.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  15. Re:Memo to ..er.. You're the real Larry Ellison by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

    chaise-lounge

    It's chaise longue, bozo -- as in long chair.

    Your argument is about two hundred years too late, English speakers haven't said long chair in a long time. It is lounge as in lazy.

    Au contraire:

  16. Re:so what? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Great, what is a Sunray good for any more?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. No Wonder /. is Running Solaris Migration Ads by segedunum · · Score: 1

    I was intrigued to see those Suse/Novell/IBM sponsored ads at the top of the page when I wasn't logged in. Now I understand why. Whereas Sun have steadily got themselves into trouble over the past ten years Oracle have now really accelerated the process to the point where you can see the end for anything SPARC or Solaris related in the next couple of years. Not even Oracle can absorb the kind of losses Sun must be making now.

    Whereas you would have thought that Oracle would want to make existing customers as happy as possible and rebuild the customer base from there, their strategy seems to be to try and screw existing customers as hard as possible to maximise revenue. Whereas this has worked in software and their database business in the past because people have generally got themselves locked into PL/SQL and Oracle's archane infrastructure the fly-in-the-ointment is that people have proved that over the past ten years they have been more than willing to move away from Solaris and SPARC, and it's much easier to switch hardware and then operating systems with the advent of Linux than it is specific applications. Oracle's software runs on more than just Solaris so their customers have a migration path off anyway.

    Oracle just don't understand the business, in other words. McNealy should have sold to IBM if he wanted anything at all to remain.

  18. Sad day for Sun by shatteredsoul · · Score: 1

    It is a sad sad day for the Sun community. I am an Enterprise Solaris admin, and it requires working with Sun on almost a daily basis. I still have trouble choking down the ability to call them Oracle. The change is not going to be easy to handle, especially with the fact that Oracle Mysupport is all Flash based (ugh). Hopefully the transition goes better than Sun's last update for their support site.

  19. Completely insecure by edfardos · · Score: 1

    All you need is an 8-digit number to "claim" your support agreement! that's it! Just start making up random numbers if you need support for anything, or more importantly lists of customers, their locations, what they have. It's a marketing goldmine! What an epic failure. Does Oracle do business with the government? Thanks but no thanks. --edfardos

  20. I wrote SunSolve by willsnow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally wrote large portions of sunsolve - and deployed it world wide for Sun. It's a crying shame what Oracle has done to the support portal - even charging for device drivers for the Sun Hardware. There have been many great engineers that have worked on SunSolve over the years - and I can't begin to note them all. Rest in peace SunSolve, and as has been shown many times, the follow on products don't even approach your functionality.

  21. Re:so what? by humphrm · · Score: 1

    Indeed. The start of the death of the "Old Sun" was the whole "we're the .com" or whatever it was, right before .com imploded.

    The next step was taking an investment from KKR... In fact I wouldn't be surprised if KKR didn't push the Oracle deal.

    So whatever Sun *was*, died in about 2002 and got buried in 2007 (KKR). At least Oracle found something to do with the body.

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
  22. The Sun is setting into irrelevance by stupkid · · Score: 1

    I don't know about everyone else, but in the fortune 100 company I happen to work for they are moving all new projects to AIX and Linux. This has been going on for the last year. The sad part, for Sun/Oracle, is that it used to be a primarily Sun shop. Now all new projects are AIX and Linux and there is no interest in approving any Sun equipment. All the tech refresh projects we have are moving businesses to either AIX or Linux. This represents a fairly large revenue stream that they are losing. Seems to be a common trend from blogs/forums/etc. that I'm reading.

  23. I worked on it for quite a few years by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    In fact it's probably still the biggest project I ever got my hands on.

    I think there were always some patches that weren't available without a support contract. We ended up having to hack some support into the ftp server to talk to the java authentication backend somewhere.

    Still i'm undoubtedly a little sad to see the end of it.

  24. As opposed to what they're doing right now? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    15 years ago, when I had hardware problems, Sun was on it. These days, Dell's on it, when it's a Dell server.

    Sun: I've got a machine spewing ECC errors (as in, filling logs and mailboxes) today. The guy wants me to update the firmware. (this is several hours to get two emails, and the engineer's in Chile, and I'm in the US). I go to the link on SunSolve... and can't get in. If I have a contract number... no, my manager tells me that we don't have a contract, but it's on warranty.

    No one at Sun/Oracle seems to be able or willing to solver this, and I'm over five hours into this joke. And when you call, even on an open tech support case, you always get someone nontechnical as the first line....

    Larry, hire a few more support staff, and give them answers? Right now, if I had to make a recommendation for hardware, there's no way I'd recommend Oracle.

                        mark

  25. Re:so what? by JonySuede · · Score: 1

    linux was not mature enough when the party started, and things you could do on sun's hardware was only match by the things you could do on the SGI

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  26. Re:so what? by JonySuede · · Score: 1

    I think that your are quite right, they deserved to die. They were mismanaged, I had a minor role at Sun, in 2006, as a campus ambassador, but still I had to report to three different boss that each gave me partially conflicting objectives. I can imagine that higher up the hierarchy the management could only get worse

    Also They were into a lot of greenfield project that did not have any hint of business case behind them. Sure it is a good idea to fund one or two of those projects, since you never know what might come out but to bet the company on that, it is reckless.

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  27. Harder to find things... by theamarand · · Score: 1

    Reading about the underlying changes (terms and conditions) is a bit scary. Forget how annoying the new Oracle support site is - that's just your basic sub-par Flash interface that keeps the executives happy. Spend a little time investigating the Soylent Green underneath, and you'll find that things are rapidly becoming a ton more restrictive than they ever were with Sun.

    Before, when working with Sun, a support contract entitled you to access to SunSolve and the majority of the information and updates. Sure, they started limiting access to end-of-life product updates like Solaris 8, but at least that's something you can plan for. They also had a limited subset of free materials which you could access (parts information), but you needed to have a support contract for other items (blown-up images, click-through links). Reasonable.

    Now, with Oracle, if it's anything like the database support end of things, you get what you pay for. It looks like if you pay nothing, you get nothing: zero, zip, zilch. Without a valid support identifier or active contract number, the account you create won't even allow you to go to the front page of the support site. Wow!

    Sun had a brand, a well-known brand, which Oracle is rapidly dismantling, and in doing so irritating a huge group of loyal customers. If the techie sentiments on this board are any indication, Oracle is going to have a really hard time keeping folks in the fold.

    I realize there are benefits to using the Oracle database, but at what cost? Hopefully, enough people will choose open-source (free as in freedom and beer) database solutions to drive down the initial cost and maintenance costs of proprietary databases such as Oracle. Why use Oracle if you can use MySQL? And if you say "well, it doesn't do XYZ," you have to ask yourself "why not?" If enough companies and governments left Oracle to use an open-source option, there's no reason why the community couldn't create every single plug-in and specialized application that Oracle has - faster, cheaper, better and for sure better supported. A community of people coding because they love something is going to be far more robust and secure in the long run than a mercenary army dedicated exclusively to the almighty dollar. Just look at Microsoft versus Linux or BSD.

    It's only a matter of time....

  28. Re:I'm AC b/c I'm on the inside by triso · · Score: 1

    Hey, Larry. Is that you?