Slashdot Mirror


EC Calls For End To Mobile Roaming Charges

An anonymous reader writes "European travellers who use their mobile phones abroad could soon see a dramatic reduction in their bills, after the European Commission announced plans to eradicate roaming charges by 2015. In a consultation paper launched yesterday, the EC invited consumers, businesses, telecom operators and public authorities to evaluate the EU's existing roaming rules, and to share their ideas on the best ways to boost competition in roaming services. 'Huge differences between domestic and roaming charges have no place in a true EU Single Market,' said vice-president of the European Commission for the Digital Agenda, Neelie Kroes. 'We need to address the source of current problems, namely a lack of competition, and to find a durable solution. But we are keeping an open mind on exactly what solution would work.'"

5 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yes please. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, that's socialism, and you go to hell for that.

    The free market is making people rich, and it's a sin to stop it with some dirty hippie collective like a government.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  2. Re:Yes please. by timbo234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, that's socialism, and you go to hell for that

    I realise you're being sarcastic but it's still worth pointing out that this isn't socialism, it's the use of the same anti-collusion (anti-trust) laws that you guys have over in the US. Basically the EU Commission worked out that phone companies were colluding (illegal in the free market) to fix phone charges for roaming.

    They then had the choice of going through a normal collusion investigation, spending huge amounts of tax-payers money in court and investigation fees and at the end probably coming up with fines of a few hundred million Euros - a small write-off for these companies. They chose the smart way - since the EU is one market companies shouldn't be allowed to charge higher prices for services that are 'imported' from another country in the EU.

    It's a rare example of governments just doing their job properly, although it's not all perfect. 2015 is a long time, especially since they started this in 2007 or 2008 and since then have been slowly lowering prices - it's gone from extreme rip-off towards the current more moderate rip-off. They really should have brought this law in for 2011 - 3 or 4 years is more than enough time for phone companies to adjust, esp. since most mobile contracts are less than 2 years.

    --
    Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
  3. Re:"Over there!" by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's no realistic way of collecting 30-ish countries, most with a distinct language and culture compared to the rest, as a single nation.

    You mean like India?

  4. Re:Yes please. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was being sarcastic. But in the US, "free market" theocrats will tell you that anything government does is socialism. Because private business does everything better, as an article of faith (disproof has no power over faith). Meanwhile, we could use a healthy dose of actual socialism, instead of the private monopolism that's managed to take over our government and is busy eating what's left of generations of hard-won social democracy.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. competition was there at the very beginning (only) by Herve5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been on GSM in Europe since the very beginning, a professional traveller.

    I perfectly remember roaming rates were widely variable according to the carrier you chose abroad, and soon there were ordered lists that you would enter in your phone to indicate careful preference for carrier X vs Y then Z, for each country. It was somehow painful to enter in the phone, but once only and cool after that.

    Then, I *even more perfectly* remember, one day the news unanimously announced, in order to simplify customer experience, all european carriers had agreed onto a clearer and common rate.

    Absolutely no one reacted. The rate of course was among the highest (at least, five or ten time higher than the lowest before).
    No newspaper claimed this was an illegal arrangement, and neither did the Ms Kroes of the time.

    Saying we discover it today is just a shame.

    When it was done, it was fully in the open, and no one reacted.

    --
    Herve S.