Slashdot Mirror


Banknotes Go Electronic To Outwit Counterfeiters

suraj.sun writes "Modern banknotes contain up to 50 anti-counterfeiting features, but adding electronic circuits programmed to confirm the note's authenticity is perhaps the ultimate deterrent, and would also help to simplify banknote tracking. From the article: 'A team of German and Japanese researchers created arrays of thin-film transistors (TFTs) by carefully depositing gold, aluminum oxide and organic molecules directly onto the notes through a patterned mask, building up the TFTs layer by layer. The result is an undamaged banknote containing around 100 organic TFTs, each of which is less than 250 nanometres thick and can be operated with voltages of just 3V. Such small voltages could be transmitted wirelessly by an external reader, such as the kind that communicates with the RFID tags found on many products.'"

66 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Go electronic! by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do we still carry money anyway?

    1. RE: Go electronic! by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      For anonymous transactions. This puts that concept at risk.

    2. Re:Go electronic! by sohmc · · Score: 4, Informative

      How else are you going to tip your stripper?

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    3. Re:Go electronic! by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd be amazed the places you can swipe a credit card

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:Go electronic! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      I do because I don't like part of the credit card companies business model, and would rather pay cash when possible.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    5. Re:Go electronic! by DubThree · · Score: 2

      Have you ever tried to pay for crack-cocaine using a credit card or your PayPal account? It's tough. I've got to use banknotes or food stamps.

    6. Re:Go electronic! by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Primarily so we can give it to who we want in the amounts we want, and we don't require Visa/Mastercard/Government/Paypal approving of the entity you are transacting with.

      Essentially it's actually an important piece of protecting our freedom.

    7. Re:Go electronic! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2

      A very large portion of the US Economy is conducted in cash. This is all to track that. To Track, to Control, to Tax.... Just another step towards the new economy for the New Age: Barter.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    8. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got my ass kicked by the bouncer the last time I tried to swipe my card between the stripper's buttocks in order to tip her.

    9. Re:Go electronic! by rolfwind · · Score: 2

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because some people recognize that once we go completely electronic, that the government will have you by the balls. Kiss any semblance of a free country goodbye.

      Being a Restaurateur in Germany used to be a fairly lucrative thing, even for a mom and pop operation - especially for a small operation. But fairly recently, if you operate a restaurant there, you have to have you cash register hooked up right to their version of the IRS. Automatic transfers taxes too and the like.

      Usually economies run well if the government tolerates a small amount of black market activity. The tighter grip they exert, the less productivity there is.

    10. Re:Go electronic! by spun · · Score: 2

      I know at least one place where the guy comes in a motorcycle to deliver you cocaine, and accepts credit card. Appears on the bill as pizza.

      Well, sure, cocaine. But not crack. As Whitney Houston said, "Crack is a poor person's drug."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Go electronic! by Nyder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because when you pay people like me.

      I don't accept checks, money orders, paypal transactions, nor do I accept credit/debit cards.

      I do accept cash. United States Dollars, to be exact.

      What do I do?

      I fix your computer. I'm the guy, who makes house calls, to fix whatever the fuck you, or someone else did to mess up your computer.

      Sure, you can go to the geek squad, or pay some "professional" place to do it. chances are, they won't fix it correctly, charge you way more then I do, and don't do house calls. Not to mention they might report something you have on your computer to some government agency. You didn't know the pics of your kids in the bathtub is considered child porn? That would suck to find out on the way to jail.

      Or you can call me up, see when i'm free, and get your shit fixed correctly the first time. I also do the barter system, but that's mostly for weed dealers. Oh, and not only do I have better things to do then poke around your harddrive for whatever you have, I could care less what you have on your computer. Not my business, and your paying me cash to keep it not my business.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:Go electronic! by cacba · · Score: 2

      Take a picture of her tattooed QR code.

    13. Re:Go electronic! by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Cash = Anonymity.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    14. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So...you want to carry a government document...to prove you're free.

      Got it.

    15. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Now here's an interesting thought--bear with me here--what if the serial number were generated as the public key to a private key hidden in the electronics in the note? That way, the authenticity could be verified easily, and, as a bonus, individual bills could be used as crypto keys.

      You need something more complicated to prevent "double spending"/multiple copies being made, and simply creating your own pub/priv pairs.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    16. Re:Go electronic! by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...Essentially it's actually an important piece of protecting our freedom..."

      Was. (if this idiocy is implemented)

      The article basically describes RFID tech capable of being built into money. These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so, as this is the real purpose of all of this--tracking every fucking dollar spent (not to mention the person doing the spending).

      As with any RFID system, use your microwave oven liberally. 5 seconds is usually enough. If enough people do this, the whole scheme falls apart as constant "counterfeits" will be a deterrent to doing business and people won't trust the RFID pass/fail determintation. Besides, what happens if your hundred-dollar bill RFID malfunctions (from, say, being crumpled up in a pocket while going through the washer?) and no longer communicates? Are you out a hundred bucks? Will the clerk waiting for you to pay for a full shopping cart of groceries care?

      It isn't a collar unless you let them put it on you.

    17. Re:Go electronic! by Stregano · · Score: 2

      You swiped in the wrong spot.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    18. Re:Go electronic! by operagost · · Score: 2

      So the government can't take all your money instantly-- without due process, of course.

      That being said, they're collectively confiscating all of our wealth via inflation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    19. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2

      Dunno. I'm not going back to that bar.

    20. Re: Go electronic! by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 2

      He means convenient transactions. Go shout that you have nothing to hide somewhere else.

    21. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Well, to spend would require passing the token (read: handing over the bill) to the new owner.

      Key generation by private individuals could be prevented through custom exotic machine architecture without which the algorithms don't work--say, quantum-processed base-(largeprime) calculations. It wouldn't last forever, of course; doubtless, someone would be able to eventually crack the base-2305843009213693951 calculations that generate the keys, but by that time the new series of bills would be out ;-p

      Well, if you put the private key in the US mint and use it as an oracle, all you need to do is make a million copies of the obviously well known pub key off any random note.

      If you put the private key in some kind of tamper proof smartcard oracle inside the note, all you need is a fake oracle that always says its public key is real.

      You can't distribute the private key to every verification terminal in known space, someone will put it on wikileaks and then, trillion digit bases or not, it'll be all over tee shirts and stuff just like the DVD keys incident.

      Decentralized anonymous authentication using two untrusted machines (the verifier and the banknote) is a harder problem than it first appears...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    22. Re:Go electronic! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still a form of stored value that can be transacted between 2 parties without government interference (if the transfer is done physically). Can't say the same for Visa/Mastercard/Paypal/Bank of America.

    23. Re:Go electronic! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2

      Usually economies run well if the government tolerates a small amount of black market activity. The tighter grip they exert, the less productivity there is.

      ...and the more star systems slip through their fingers.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    24. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Why do you need to make anonymous transactions?

      Ohhhh. You mean illegal transactions.

      Do you mean illegal now, or illegal later? How can I know what will be illegal later, and thus protect myself now?

      You can understand why certain ethnic groups in Germany might be nervous at the idea of providing a financial record of all menorahs ever sold, even if at this point they are certainly currently legal. Who benefits from that kind of record? The people or the state?

      Same story different country and decade with ammo, alcohol, tobacco, certain firearm components, jtag smart card interfaces, gold coins...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    25. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      First, that rulling was political horseshit.

      In other words, you’re right, and anybody who says otherwise, including the Supreme Court, is wrong. Why am I not surprised...

      Future courts will read the Constitution again and realize that Roberts et al were in on the fix, and will reverse it.

      Keep dreaming, troll.

      Second, That's how the law works. Law enforcement is beholden to the laws that are in force, not to your interpretation of the constitution. When the law is in force, law enforcement enforces that law. When the law gets struck down, they stop.

      You basically just completely contradicted your initial claim, which was that nobody needs to worry about an unconstitutional law (like an ex post facto law) ever being passed and enforced.

      Now you’re claiming that unconstitutional laws can and will be passed and enforced until they get struck down, which was my point all along.

      Go troll someone else.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    26. Re:Go electronic! by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so

      Someday, but a year? Not even close. There are plenty of retailers still using pre-broadband POS systems. Eventually they all get swapped out, but a year is optimistic (or pessimistic given your POV) even for the ones that go cutting edge. This stuff moves slowwwwwwwwwwwwly.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    27. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      That goes both ways. Some businesses take plastic but not cash. Almost no businesses take pennies for anything more than a dollar transaction, if that.

      Pedantry aside, I’ve never had a problem managing to pay for something in cash, apart from the odd vending machine that wouldn’t take my dollar bills or the payments which were too large for me to comfortably carry that much cash (in which case I used a cashier’s check, which is equivalent to cash anyway).

      And I use my credit card for purchases of a few dollars and cents, too, so I’m well aware of the conveniences of plastic. But don’t act like the only reason anyone would need to carry paper money is for illegal purposes. That’s just plain retarded.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    28. Re:Go electronic! by yurtinus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait what? Currency may have it's faults, but it's been a long time since it was feasible to barter for anything. Part of industrialization (and specialization) means that what you produce won't be valuable to everybody. I can't exactly trade some software coding work with the farmer up the highway for some eggs, but I can trade it for some money from a software company and then use that money to buy my eggs. There's no reason to look so far backwards when trying to be "free." It's unfortunate the steps governments have taken these days to get the impression that anything a government can do is automatically restricting to freedom - but realistically speaking, without a small government with a rule of law and protection of property, you *can't* be free. Try bartering anything when the guy with the bigger guns will simply take what he wants. I'll be the first to stand up and say the government has far overstepped its bounds, but claiming there's more freedom in using a Mastercard than a nationally recognized legal tender is asinine.

      Cash transactions are not to avoid reporting income. It's to buy what I want from who I want without anybody snooping into the details, government or otherwise.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    29. Re:Go electronic! by Garth+Smith · · Score: 2

      MasterCard and Visa charge a significant service fee to every merchant that accepts them. This in fact raises the cost of goods by several percent. Of course the trade off is that money can move around easily and quickly which would have a positive effect on the cost of the good. It has now reached a point where people are even asking what the purpose of cash is anymore. When everyone treats credit cards as the de facto standard of payment, the card companies are making money off every transaction that occurs. This is one reason why credit card companies would love businesses to start using credit cards. They can make money first off the merchant and then again off the customer.

      The duopoly of MasterCard and Visa now have a lock on the market, and by working together can skim money off most consumer transactions while pushing all costs to the merchant. This is their prize for setting up and controlling the infrastructure that moves those electrons around. However, just because the card companies have the power to skim money off every transaction doesn't make it right. Consider for a moment, a percentage taken from *every* transaction made. What kind of effect on the economy would that have? And this cut isn't like taxes that pay for roads and schools. The goal is to make billions for just a few people. (I haven't even gotten to interest rates, fees, or the many other ways to squeeze money out of a consumer.)

      For these reasons I stop by the ATM on my walk to work and pay with cash whenever I can. I also like knowing that the hard working businesses I support will get to keep a bit more of my cash. In fact, a few restaurants in my area have decided MasterCard and Visa's "vig" is too much and only take cash.

      But perhaps the most important reason of all: My herb dealer doesn't take credit.

    30. Re:Go electronic! by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Your quip is clever and funny, but to be serious for a second it is important to realise that government a priori does not automatically mean "nonfree" however much the popular rhetoric says so. For example the existance of maintained public roads increases your freedom of movement. A putatively impartial judiciary that enforces contract increases your freedom of commerce. A public agency that hunts down murderers increases your freedom unless you're a murderer etc etc.

      OK OK, that being said we can start to argue about the dividing line in enabling and restrictive freedoms, Leviathan, 8000 years of political philosophy, abuse of power etc. But the point remains: people form and participate in/with governments because they feel they will be more free with them than without them. And people are fallible....quite fallible.

      (and for the record this cash tracking is a horrible idea)

    31. Re:Go electronic! by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because then it'd be called a politician.

    32. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Was. (if this idiocy is implemented)

      The article basically describes RFID tech capable of being built into money. These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so, as this is the real purpose of all of this--tracking every fucking dollar spent (not to mention the person doing the spending).

      As with any RFID system, use your microwave oven liberally. 5 seconds is usually enough. If enough people do this, the whole scheme falls apart as constant "counterfeits" will be a deterrent to doing business and people won't trust the RFID pass/fail determintation. Besides, what happens if your hundred-dollar bill RFID malfunctions (from, say, being crumpled up in a pocket while going through the washer?) and no longer communicates? Are you out a hundred bucks? Will the clerk waiting for you to pay for a full shopping cart of groceries care?

      It isn't a collar unless you let them put it on you.

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me. End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time. Say something bad about the government? Associate with the wrong people? Refuse to take this mark that says you agree to worship the mandated one-world religion instead of whoever you want? No transaction for you... and the police will be there in a moment. Please remain calm.

      Just 30 years ago, none of us thought this would be in our lifetimes. After all, who could imagine stringing together 1,000,000 apple 2Es over phone lines to make this work? Now? I think I could design the system myself. We're not supposed to set dates. But at least this part of the puzzle can happen pretty much right now.

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    33. Re:Go electronic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time.

      Not without a lot of baseless guesswork, they don't.

    34. Re:Go electronic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      It (the beast/the antichrist together with the false prophet) also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

      Can you explain how this equates to a "one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time"? It would seem to me that a much more trivial interpretation would be a law enacted such that no-one can trade with people not bearing the "mark".

      You'll find that christians will most likely happily go to their death before agreeing to an implanted RFID (or similar) chip used to facilitate buying and selling.

      The prophecy quite specifically talks about a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It would seem that implanting an RFID chip into the left hand should not pose any problem to Christians.

    35. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 2

      MasterCard and Visa charge a significant service fee to every merchant that accepts them. This in fact raises the cost of goods by several percent. Of course the trade off is that money can move around easily and quickly which would have a positive effect on the cost of the good.

      And in some cases more safely. That's why some merchants are actually quite happy with credit card transactions - smaller amounts of cash "just waiting" to be stolen/lost.

      However, just because the card companies have the power to skim money off every transaction doesn't make it right. Consider for a moment, a percentage taken from *every* transaction made. What kind of effect on the economy would that have? And this cut isn't like taxes that pay for roads and schools. The goal is to make billions for just a few people. (I haven't even gotten to interest rates, fees, or the many other ways to squeeze money out of a consumer.)

      So what if the Government undercut them? Visa and Mastercard will be very unhappy of course but that might be a feature not a flaw :).

      --
    36. Re:Go electronic! by noidentity · · Score: 2

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess.

      Take a look in the mirror, and you may find you aren't a Christian either.

    37. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      Unless your purpose is illegal, you really have no economically realistic excuse for keeping cash around.

      Here’s a nickel, kid. Go buy yourself a clue.

      Oh wait, that’s cash. It’d probably be illegal.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    38. Re:Go electronic! by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 2

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me. End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time. Say something bad about the government? [snip snip] It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      When you talk about profecy, please provide a reference.

      Ah, "one-world cashless financial system" cannot be found in the Bible, you say? Come on, "mark of the Beast" is not coming close to describing cash or tracking devices. The text pretty much describes a *tatoo worn on the forehead*.

      Stop "interpreting" texts by inserting meanings they do not have. That is a big source of man-created wars and strife, which is NOT christian (example: cusades, jihad, Al-Quaeda, inquisition).

      Moreover, a "one-world currency" has existed and been in universal use for daily transactions until quite recently: gold. Do you object using gold?

      --
      You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    39. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 2

      You can buy and sell things so long as you can barter with someone. Making the currency electronic and requiring implanted RFID devices to make transactions will make one's life difficult, but it won't close the barter loophole - and, as in any case of regulation, a shadow economy would inevitably arise, with its own currency (likely gold and other precious metals and stones). So you'd still need a law either way.

      Yeah, this is the consensus. That christians will have to find other ways to get what they need. I suspect it will be a lot like nazi germany. There were some non-jewish germans who helped the jews. I think a black market will be a lot harder with a modern surveillance society, but certainly not impossible. The bible clearly says that there will be christians who make it all the way through the tribulation alive. This means 3.5 years on the run. They must be eating something, even if it's been provided supernaturally.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  2. "Ultimate" Deterrent? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's hard for me to imagine any security measure economical enough to implement in $20 bills could not be replicated by a really well-funded forger, such as a foreign intelligence agency. If there is any "ultimate" deterrent, it would involve tracking the movement of funds from one individual to another, i.e. marginalizing the use of cash, or making it equivalent to electronic banking, so Big Brother can keep an eye on it.

    1. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      The only "Ultimate" deterrent would be to make it impossible to produce the currency for less than the value of the currency.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  3. What's the point? by Skidborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All that money won't be worth the paper it's printed on in a few years anyway.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  4. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by durrr · · Score: 2

    Thives get RFID readers with antennas, check how much you are carrying and only pick high value targets.
    Oh, and no use carrying a "fake" wallet with low bills. They'll scan you just to make sure they got everything once again after you hand over the wallet.

  5. RFID Money ?! Get your asbestos undies by meerling · · Score: 2

    I wonder if their new banknotes will survive the US money test.

    Assuming it does and gets adopted by countries, it'll be time for the shielded wallets that are RFID proof.
    I figure a flame war will start over this somewhere :)

    Here are just a few of those sites you can get those shielded wallets from for the more paranoid amongst you : )

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/8cdd/
    http://www.idstronghold.com/
    http://www.tamperseal.com/rfid-blocking-leather-wallet-p-332.html
    http://rfidwallet.org/

  6. Washing machine defeats security by perpenso · · Score: 2

    And how durable is the circuitry? Abrasion, water, folding, chemicals (ex. laundry soap), etc are usually hazardous to circuitry. Seems like there will be a few false positives, assuming of course they could even manufacture such notes in a cost effective and reliable manner. The US is already having problems printing its own money.

  7. That's okay by itsownreward · · Score: 2

    This is nothing a few seconds in the microwave won't fix.

    Of course, I had to use a hammer to fix my passport's problem.

    1. Re:That's okay by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Yup... but then places could easily refuse to accept it... just as some places right now already refuse to take 50 or 100 dollar bills because they fear counterfeiting issues. You would have to take an extra trip to the bank to exchange it for something that the business would take, or else do business elsewhere.

    2. Re:That's okay by rhook · · Score: 2

      Every transaction involves debt. The definition of the word even says so. When you buy something you owe a debt to the retailer when they agree to the transaction.

      "Something owed, such as money, goods, or services."

  8. Convenience in some situations by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Part of the problem, particularly in the US, is there isn't a good person-to-person electronic payment system that is easy to use, secure, and low cost. So let's say you pay for lunch on your credit card, how do I pay you back? Paypal requires we both have accounts, go to a computer, transfer, incur a fee, wait, and so on. Unless you happen to be a business owner you yourself don't accept credit cards. So cash is the only easy way.

    Can also apply to businesses. Like when I had a local plumber come out to fix a broken faucet. They would take a credit card, of course, they have to in this day and age, but they didn't want to pay the retardedly expensive fees to have a full on wireless, battery powered, unit in their trucks. So I would have had to call their office and give them the number, they run the card, call back the plumber and tell him "It's good write him a receipt." Or, I could do what I did, get some cash and just pay him on the spot.

    We need a some more advances in electronic currency before it'll be feasible to not need paper anymore.

    1. Re:Convenience in some situations by metrix007 · · Score: 2

      I've always thought this was ridiculous. In the rest of thje developed world I can send to another persons bank account any amount for free. It may take a few business days, but absolutely no need for paypal.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    2. Re:Convenience in some situations by AltairDusk · · Score: 2

      It's always good to have paper as an option. I suspect the real driving force behind this idea if it is implemented will be from government agencies wanting an effective tracking system for cash. God forbid we pay the neighbor's kid to mow the lawn without the government knowing about it.

    3. Re:Convenience in some situations by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Paper? What sort of backward state still uses paper banknotes? :-)
      In Australia plastic or 'polymer' notes last longer and are harder to forge.

  9. "simplification" ??? by l2718 · · Score: 2
    Do we really want to

    ... simplify banknote tracking.

    At the moment, cash is basically the only (mostly) anonymous means of payment available. Since when is less anonymous is a good idea?

  10. Where's George? by snookerhog · · Score: 2
    what was wrong with using where's george to track the usage of bills?

    seriously though, once cash is traceable, it ceases to be useful. unless they only use it on very large bills and they reinstate the higher denomination bills

  11. Why not just use Polymer notes? by metrix007 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They were developed by the Aussie government in the 80's, and they are basically impossible to counterfeit. They are also waterproof, near indestructible etc.
    Poorer countries such as Nicaragua, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Kuwait use them, so why have other countries not caught up?

    This isn't just the US, but the EU and UK as well. Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    1. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      UK doesn't use paper notes. We use cotton and linen rag instead.

      Those are also called paper - if it's made out of pressed fibers, it's paper. And, indeed, apparently bank notes are usually made of cotton paper.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by muphin · · Score: 2

      they actually did a trial run in the US using 'our' notes, the polymer ones, AKA Securency.
      a huge portion of people using the notes didn't like the way they felt, therefore the stopped using them. it wasn't because there were sturdier and easier to distinguish (colour coded)
      Americans are very stubborn and slow to take things up, so don't expect too many changed with their currency, i bet they would invest billions in making their money feel the same but change everything else, great 'money management' there.

      sexy information and the trusted wikipedia

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    3. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Kozz · · Score: 2

      Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

      It seems to me that, provided the "old" currency formats continue to be acceptable payment (think twenty-year-old $20 USD bill), why bother counterfeiting the new styles? Just continue to counterfeit the older style bills.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    4. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by dakameleon · · Score: 2

      eh? I've never had ink smearing off my Australian banknotes, no matter how new or old. It's as flexible and as thin as paper, and far less tear-prone. I haven't had a bank note "deteriorate" on me, and the oldest ones I've seen have the same kind of fading you might see on a paper note. It even has a translucent "window" as a security device, or so they tell us. They're damnably hard to counterfiet, though we shouldn't be under the illusion that it would be impossble.

      Australia replaced its whole active money supply by 1996, and other countries have followed suit. Yes, the US money in criculation is huge, far more so than the Australian or other currencies which have gone down the same path. The average note in circulation lasts about 2 years, and polymer notes last more like 5 years, so you're going to end up saving money in the long run, pun not intended. No-one is saying throw the baby out with the bathwater - just as there are newer designs of notes, newer materials can be introduced alongside the old ones; it's just the US is so hidebound in its attachment to the form of money as it is today in some mistaken veneration of its symbolism, as though money has never changed its design in the past, that it is unlikely that such an action would be possible in the short term.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    5. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by metrix007 · · Score: 2

      Inks smear right off. The solution is to laminate, then it turns out they delaminate. The solution to that is to essentially plastic weld two thin layers together into one piece of clear plastic. Then they're thick enough to crack. They're not as indestructible as you claim.

      This is pure BS. I have notes from over 10 years ago that are still in ace condition. You have no idea of that which you speak.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    6. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Typically when you change the banknotes, you gradually phase out the old ones - first they are legal tender, then they can be accepted or not at merchant's discretion, then they can only be exchanged at a bank, and finally they're just paper.

    7. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by ksd1337 · · Score: 2

      Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

      Crane and Co., the paper supplier to the US gov't for its paper money, hires lobbyists. It's the reason we don't use polymer banknotes. It's also the reason that we haven't replaced all our $1 banknotes with coins.

  12. Re:Gold? by clone52431 · · Score: 2

    if they have gold in them now this little bit of otherwise worthless paper actually has a minuscule bit of value

    I’ve heard they already contain measurable levels of cocaine.

    --
    Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  13. The Interrogation by Petersko · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Mr. Petersko, we have a record of you receiving this bill at 5:00 p.m. from the ATM. At 5:40 p.m. a marijuana dealer was arrested and he had possession of that bill. Can you explain that?"

    "No, sir, I cannot. From 5:00 p.m. until 5:58 p.m. I was fucking your mother in the alley by the ATM. I can't count it as an alibi because she'll deny it, but if you'll examine her anus you'll find some compelling evidence. Alternatively, take your suspicion and go away."

    And then I'll pray the L.A.-style cop beating will be caught on cell phone.

  14. There's a really easy solution to that problem by sean.peters · · Score: 2

    Don't make it optional. When you stop printing paper bills in favor of polymer, and remove all the paper bills from circulation as they return to banks (same process that happens now with existing bills), people will use them.

    And I have approximately zero sympathy for the argument that we should give up on a solution that's more economical and harder to counterfeit because "people don't like the way they feel".