Slashdot Mirror


French Use Space Tech To Find Parking Spots

itwbennett writes "Using technology developed by French space agency CNES (Centre Nationale d'Etudes Spatiales) to explore the planet Venus, drivers in the city of Toulouse are discovering something much more down-to-earth: vacant parking spots. The system is based on 3,000 sensors buried just under the pavement that detect changes in the electromagnetic environment around them and communicate the results via coaxial cable to a server, which makes the information available in real time to drivers' smartphones."

13 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Driving with smartphones? by Scryer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder whether Toulouse has laws against using your smartphone while driving -- this could be a nice income source for the municipality as well, staking out the parking spots with hidden cameras!

    1. Re:Driving with smartphones? by metalmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Simple solution, find park first then use smartphone to search for a park.

  2. Exploring Venus by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the plan is to explore Venus by burying sensors around the planet and detecting when something parks on top of them?

    At least the pioneers will be able to locate a parking spot quickly!

  3. Re:Can they try using it to find razors? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You made a joke about the French being cowards and their women having too much hair! Hahahahahaha! That is both clever and original sir, i salute you! The only thing I can't understand is why you posted anonymously and denied yourself credit for such hilarity!

  4. Same in SF by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We have a similar system in San Francisco:
    http://sfpark.org/how-it-works/

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  5. old news by redfood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have had something like this at BWI for years. Even better - you don't have to look at your phone while driving. There are red and green lights marking open spots and the number of free spaces listed at the head of each row.

    Similarly, the parking structure at the Grove in LA lists the number of free spaces per floor.

  6. Vacant Parking Detected! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Step on it Pierre, no time Toulouse!

  7. Bad Article or Worst System Ever? by Leuf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The 3,000 sensors, buried about nine inches apart, are able to pinpoint open parking spots within 980 feet"

    Something doesn't seem right about that.

    1. Re:Bad Article or Worst System Ever? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're very small parking spaces. Ever seen a French car?

  8. Re:Can they try using it to find razors? by feepness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he wanted credit, he'd post with his username and call Americans fat and stupid. Modded +5 in no time.

  9. Re:Can they try using it to find razors? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 3, Funny

    If he wanted credit, he'd post with his username and call Americans fat and stupid. Modded +5 in no time.

    I may be fat and stupid, but you

  10. Re:Silly Drivers, Trix are for Kids by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3
    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  11. Re:Yeah, Right! by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, this is just an excuse for the government to have another electronic “eye” watching you all the frigging time.

    The goal isn’t to eliminate wrongdoers, the goal is to monetize them more efficiently. If wrongdoers were eliminated, they wouldn’t make any money off parking tickets. It’s just the same argument as the red-light cameras, which my city has had for a while and is currently considering moving them to new intersections because hardly anyone runs the cameras any more. Mission accomplished – wait, these aren’t making any more money... problem? Only if your goal was to make money.

    Of course if they move them, I’m sure the previously-monitored intersections will pretty quickly return to exactly as they were before the cameras were installed. If the goal is to cut down on T-bone accidents caused by red-light runners at intersections that are identified as particularly bad for this sort of thing, the cameras need to stay at those intersections, yeah? Moving the cameras to less-bad intersections simply to generate more revenue could actually result in people getting killed. Priorities? You bet.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.